online supplement 6 – forest plots prevalence of physical
TRANSCRIPT
Online supplement 6 – Forest plots Prevalence of physical aggression
Prevalence of verbal aggression
NOTE: Weights are from random effects analysis
Overall (I-squared = 100.0%, p = 0.000)
Jacob et al. (2013)
Lehmann, McCormick & Kizer (1999)
Kelly et al. (2017)
Study
Chen, Hwu & Wang (2009)
Pekurinen et al (2017)
llkiw-Lavalle & Grenyer (2003)
Schwartz & Park (1999)
Niu et al. (2019)
Sukhidolsky, Cardona & Martin (2005)
Ryan et al. (2004)
Kelly et al. (2016)
Raveendranathan & Chaturvedi (2012)
van den Bogaard et al. (2018)
Podubinski et al. (2017)
Danivas et al. (2016)
Daffern, Mayer & Martin (2006)
Bilici et al. (2016)
Wystanski (2000)
Amoo & Fatoye (2010)
Bostrom et al (2012)
0.43 (0.37, 0.49)
0.24 (0.23, 0.25)
0.35 (0.35, 0.35)
0.70 (0.69, 0.71)
ES (95% CI)
0.35 (0.34, 0.36)
0.35 (0.35, 0.35)
0.38 (0.36, 0.40)
0.36 (0.35, 0.37)
0.56 (0.55, 0.56)
0.52 (0.50, 0.54)
0.33 (0.32, 0.34)
0.70 (0.69, 0.71)
0.70 (0.68, 0.72)
0.32 (0.31, 0.33)
0.09 (0.09, 0.10)
0.44 (0.43, 0.45)
0.29 (0.28, 0.30)
0.93 (0.91, 0.94)
0.16 (0.16, 0.16)
0.37 (0.35, 0.39)
0.50 (0.49, 0.51)
100.00
5.00
5.01
5.00
Weight
5.00
%
5.01
4.99
5.01
5.00
4.99
5.00
5.00
4.99
5.00
5.01
5.00
5.01
4.99
5.01
4.98
4.99
0.43 (0.37, 0.49)
0.24 (0.23, 0.25)
0.35 (0.35, 0.35)
0.70 (0.69, 0.71)
ES (95% CI)
0.35 (0.34, 0.36)
0.35 (0.35, 0.35)
0.38 (0.36, 0.40)
0.36 (0.35, 0.37)
0.56 (0.55, 0.56)
0.52 (0.50, 0.54)
0.33 (0.32, 0.34)
0.70 (0.69, 0.71)
0.70 (0.68, 0.72)
0.32 (0.31, 0.33)
0.09 (0.09, 0.10)
0.44 (0.43, 0.45)
0.29 (0.28, 0.30)
0.93 (0.91, 0.94)
0.16 (0.16, 0.16)
0.37 (0.35, 0.39)
0.50 (0.49, 0.51)
100.00
5.00
5.01
5.00
Weight
5.00
%
5.01
4.99
5.01
5.00
4.99
5.00
5.00
4.99
5.00
5.01
5.00
5.01
4.99
5.01
4.98
4.99
00 .25 .5 .75 1
NOTE: Weights are from random effects analysis
Overall (I-squared = 100.0%, p = 0.000)
van den Bogaard et al. (2018)
Daffern, Ogloff & Howells (2003)
Lehmann, McCormick & Kizer (1999)
Ilkiw-Lavalle & Grenyer (2003)
Daffern, Mayer & Martin (2006)
study
Chen, Hwu & Wang (2009)
Schwartz & Park (1999)
Podubinski et al. (2017)
Danivas et al. (2016)
Niu et al. (2019)
0.57 (0.34, 0.81)
0.57 (0.56, 0.58)
0.62 (0.61, 0.63)
0.11 (0.11, 0.11)
0.58 (0.56, 0.60)
0.62 (0.61, 0.63)
ES (95% CI)
0.51 (0.50, 0.52)
0.73 (0.72, 0.74)
0.34 (0.33, 0.34)
0.87 (0.86, 0.89)
0.79 (0.78, 0.80)
100.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
9.99
10.00
Weight
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
%
0.57 (0.34, 0.81)
0.57 (0.56, 0.58)
0.62 (0.61, 0.63)
0.11 (0.11, 0.11)
0.58 (0.56, 0.60)
0.62 (0.61, 0.63)
ES (95% CI)
0.51 (0.50, 0.52)
0.73 (0.72, 0.74)
0.34 (0.33, 0.34)
0.87 (0.86, 0.89)
0.79 (0.78, 0.80)
100.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
9.99
10.00
Weight
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
%
00 .25 .5 .75 1
Supplementary material BMJ Open
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030230:e030230. 9 2019;BMJ Open, et al. Thibaut B