online training in evidence-based trauma treatments: lessons from tfcbtweb and ctgweb
TRANSCRIPT
Daniel W. Smith1, Benjamin E. Saunders1, Nicholas C. Heck2, & Leticia L. Duvivier1
1Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral SciencesMedical University of South Carolina
Charleston, SC2Department of Psychology, Marquette University
Milwaukee, WI
Presented at the BASPCAN Annual Congress, April 14, 2015, Edinburgh, Scotland UK
Online Training in Evidence-Based Trauma Treatments:
Lessons from TFCBTWeb and CTGWeb
Disseminating Evidence Supported Mental Health
Interventions Limited by a lack of training resources.
AvailabilityAccessibilityCost (actual costs, time, lost productivity)Effectiveness
Spread and reach of ESIs constrained by training capacity.
Online training is a promising mechanism for building training capability.AsynchronousStand aloneUnmonitored
Online Advantages
Virtually universal access worldwide Flexibility, training can fit into therapists’
schedules Time efficient, less lost productivity Multi-media, interactive Immediate access to clinical tools and resources Can be accessed repeatedly
Online Disadvantages
Static in presentation No interactivity with expert faculty Not all learners can engage with unmonitored
online learning. Expensive to construct Must be maintained Need for customer service
Questions
Will target trainees (therapists) engage with online training?
How effective are online training resources in… helping learners acquire knowledge of the treatment?helping learners develop clinical skills?promoting implementation with fidelityencouraging regular use of the treatment with
appropriate patients?promoting sustained use of the treatment over time?
Are online training tools cost effective?
TF-CBTWeb is a web-based, distance education training course for learning Trauma-Focused Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (TF-CBT).
TF-CBTWeb
www.musc.edu/tfcbt
Launched onOctober 1, 2005
Each module has:• Concise explanations• Video demonstrations• Clinical scripts• Cultural
considerations• Clinical Challenges• 4-item pre/post
knowledge tests
TF-CBTWeb
www.musc.edu/tfcbt
TF-CBTWeb was developed through grant No. 1-UD1-SM56070 from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
CTGWeb is a follow-up course that teaches how to apply TF-CBT to cases of child traumatic grief
CTGWebwww.musc.edu/ctg
CTGWeb is offered free of charge.
CTGWeb was launched on September 1, 2008.
6 hours of CE
What do we know about how these things work?
Our basic questions:If we build it, will they come?If they come, will they:
Learn it?Like it?
TF-CBTWeb Learners
From October 1, 2005 to September 30, 2012:TF-CBTWeb had 123,848 unique registered
learners. About 40 learners registered for TF-CBTWeb
each day.
10,197 (8.9%) learners lived outside the U.S. and its territories 130 countries represented, Albania to Zimbabwe. Most learners were from countries where English is
prevalent.
Heck, N., Saunders, B. E., & Smith, D. W. (in press). Web-based training for an evidence-supported treatment: Training completion and knowledge acquisition in a global sample of learners. Child Maltreatment.
TF-CBTWeb Academic Degrees of
Learners
Graduate Student15.6%
Masters74.1%
Ph.D.8.5%
MD1.8%
N = 123,848
TF-CBTWeb Learners’ Professions
17.5%41.0%
26.4%
9.0%
0.9%1.8%
3.4%
PsychologySocial WorkCounselingM/ F TherapyNursingPsychiatryOther
N=123,848
62.7% 19.6% 12.1% 5.6%
<5 years5-10 years10-20 years>20 years
TF-CBTWeb Experience with Traumatized Children
N=123,848
TF-CBTWeb Registration and Completion
Results
Learners All U.S.1 Outside U.S.
Registered 123,848 113,651 10,197
Completed2 (by 12/31/12)
67,208(54.3%)
64,427(56.7%)
2,781(27.3%)
1Includes learners living in the U.S. and U.S. military and Department of Defense employed personnel living outside the U.S.2We are modifying the way we calculate completion rates.
TF-CBTWeb Days to Complete Course
71.8 (188) Mean (SD) days to complete course
2,545 days Longest number of days to complete course
1 day Shortest number of days to complete course (mode)
11 days 50% of completers finish within
43 days 75% of completers finish within
N=67,208
TF-CBTWeb Mean Pre- and Post-test Scores by
Module
PsychoEdRelxn
CtlBrth
ThghtSt
AffEx
CogCop TN
CogProcBMT
P-Ch
0102030405060708090
100
Post-test
Pre-test
Course Module
Me
an
Sc
ore
N = 67,208; All differences p<.001. Cohen’s d range: .54 – 1.22
Learner Evaluation of TF-CBTWeb
63.0% 55.2% 51.1% 57.8% 50.9% 55.4% 45.0%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
EasyNavigation
Easy toLearn
Good Look &Feel
ClearDirections
VideosHelped
ScriptsPractical
ClinicalChallenges
Str.Dis+Disagree Agree Strongly Agree
66,497 EvaluationsHeck, N., Saunders, B. E., & Smith, D. W. (2015). Satisfaction and usage patterns of a web-based training course for an evidence-supported treatment. Manuscript in preparation.
Learner Evaluation of TF-CBTWeb
33.5% 55.6%45.9% 49.5% 45.3% 48.3%
54.1%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
CulturalHelpful
TechniquesHelpful
LearnPsychoEd
Learn StressManagement
Learn Affect CognitiveCoping
TraumaNarrative
Str.Dis+Disagree Agree Strongly Agree
66,497 Evaluations
Learner Evaluation of TF-CBTWeb
49.4% 46.5% 47.9%33.8% 39.9% 43.3%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
CognitiveProcessing
BehaviorManagement
Engage Parents AppropriateClients
AppropriateProblems
Will Use TF-CBT
Str.Dis+Disagree Agree Strongly Agree
66,497 EvaluationsTotal Satisfaction Score: M = 3.43 (.51)
Learner Attrition : Modules 1-5
Reg-istra-tion
Pre - 1
Post - 1
Pre - 2
Post - 2
Pre - 3
Post - 3
Pre - 4
Post - 4
Pre - 5
Post - 5
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
-25,203
-8,783
n=123,848 n=75,754
Module Pre- Post-test Completion
-4,835
Learner Attrition: Modules 6-10
Pre -
6
Post - 6
Pre -
7
Post - 7
Pre -
8
Post - 8
Pre -
9
Post - 9
Pre -
10
Post - 1
020000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
n=74,252 n=67,208
68% retention from Pre-179% retention from Pre-291% retention from Pre-6
Module Pre- Post-test Completion
CTGWeb Learners
From January 1, 2009 to September 1, 2013:TF-CBTWeb had 11,871 unique registered
learners. About 7 learners registered for CTGWeb each
day.
713 (6.0%) learners lived outside the U.S. and its territories 74 countries represented Australia (81), Germany, Japan, UK, Israel, Kenya,
Sweden, Norway/Singapore (10)
CTGWeb Academic Degrees of
Learners
Graduate Student16.6%
Masters76.4%
Ph.D.6.0%
MD1.0%
N = 11,871
TF-CBTWeb Learners’ Professions
14.8%40.6%
29.5%
10.2%
2.9%
0.9%0.8%
PsychologySocial WorkCounselingM/ F TherapyNursingPsychiatryOther
N=11,871
67.8% 18.0% 10.1% 3.9%
<5 years5-10 years10-20 years>20 years
CTGWeb Experience with Traumatized Children
N=11,871
CTGWeb Registration and Completion
Results
Learners All U.S.1 Outside U.S.
Registered 11,871 11,158 713
Completed8,825
(74.3%)8,390
(75.2%)435
(61.0%)
1Includes learners living in the U.S. and U.S. military and Department of Defense employed personnel living outside the U.S.
CTGWeb Mean Pre- and Post-test Scores by
Module
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Post-test
Pre-test
Course Module
Me
an
Sc
ore
N = 8,825; All differences p<.001. Cohen’s d range: .20 – .89
Conclusions
Our basic questions: If we build it, will they come? – YES – and in much higher
numbers than we anticipated. If they come, will they:
Like it? – Overwhelmingly they do Learn it?
Knowledge: yes Skill: no idea yet
Though costly to construct (we estimate $250K per course), per use cost decreases over time, making online training a cost-effective training mechanism. As of 2014, we had over 120K TFCBTWeb completers, so it’s ~$2 +
change per learner
How does online learning compare to in-person? Is the combination better than either alone?
Under preliminary study (Cohen, Mannarino, & Deblinger)
Collaborator Acknowledgment
TF-CBTWeb (2005)
CTGWeb (2008)
Saunders Deblinger Cohen Mannarino
Saunders Deblinger Cohen Mannarino Goodman