ontario toxics reduction act/media/files/d/de...canada’s national pollutant release inventory...

17
De Beers Victor Mine 2014 TRA Annual Report Summary 1 | Page ONTARIO TOXICS REDUCTION ACT DE BEERS CANADA INC. VICTOR MINE 2014 REPORT ON TOXIC SUBSTANCE ACCOUNTING SUMMARY INTRODUCTION In 2009, the Toxics Reduction Act (Act) and its associated regulation (O.Reg. 455/09) were promulgated as part of the Ministry of Environment and Climate Change (MOECC’s) toxics reduction strategy, with the purposes of preventing pollution and protect human health and the environment by reducing the use and creation of toxic substances, and to inform Ontarians about toxic substances (TRA 2009, c. 19, s. 1.). The Act is applicable to manufacturing facilities with North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes starting with “31”, “32” or “33” and facilities wit h NAICS codes starting with “212”. Regulated substances under the Act include all substances listed in Environment Canada’s National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI) and O.Reg. 127/01. Forty-seven substances and substance groups were listed in Table A of O.Reg. 455/09 as Phase I priority substances, and reduction plans were prepared and submitted in December 2012. Phase II of the Act required accounting for all other NPRI substances and the TRPs were prepared in 2013. For De Beers Victor Mine, nineteen substances were determined to be subject to the Toxics Reduction Act, and a total of seven Toxic Reduction Plans have been prepared. They include dioxins and furans individual congeners, hexachlorobenzene (HCB), metals (arsenic, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, copper, lead, manganese, nickel, selenium, vanadium and zinc), phosphorous, carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides and particulate matter (TSP, PM10, and PM2.5). The annual toxic substance accounting requirements were completed for the 2014 reporting year, and this annual toxic substance accounting summary has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Ontario Toxics Reduction Act and Ontario Regulation 455/09. Further information on the Toxics Reduction Act is provided by the Ministry of the Environment on their website www.ontario.ca/ministry-environment-and-climate-change. TOXIC REDUCTION POLICY STATEMENT OF INTENT De Beers Canada Inc., Victor Mine is committed to playing a leadership role in protecting the environment. Wherever feasible, we will reduce the creation and discharge of toxic substances in full compliance with all federal and provincial regulations. Our employees are encouraged to participate in all types of toxic substance reduction activities. Toxic substance reduction will be an ongoing effort at DeBeers, and we will continue to monitor advancements to ensure that options that are both technologically and financially viable are implemented at our facility. No current options were identified that are technically or economically feasible.

Upload: others

Post on 10-Sep-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ONTARIO TOXICS REDUCTION ACT/media/Files/D/De...Canada’s National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI) and O.Reg. 127/01. Forty-seven substances and substance groups were listed in

De Beers Victor Mine – 2014 TRA Annual Report Summary 1 | P a g e

ONTARIO TOXICS REDUCTION ACT

DE BEERS CANADA INC. VICTOR MINE

2014 REPORT ON TOXIC SUBSTANCE ACCOUNTING SUMMARY

INTRODUCTION

In 2009, the Toxics Reduction Act (Act) and its associated regulation (O.Reg. 455/09) were

promulgated as part of the Ministry of Environment and Climate Change (MOECC’s) toxics

reduction strategy, with the purposes of preventing pollution and protect human health and the

environment by reducing the use and creation of toxic substances, and to inform Ontarians

about toxic substances (TRA 2009, c. 19, s. 1.).

The Act is applicable to manufacturing facilities with North American Industry Classification

System (NAICS) codes starting with “31”, “32” or “33” and facilities with NAICS codes starting

with “212”. Regulated substances under the Act include all substances listed in Environment

Canada’s National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI) and O.Reg. 127/01. Forty-seven

substances and substance groups were listed in Table A of O.Reg. 455/09 as Phase I priority

substances, and reduction plans were prepared and submitted in December 2012. Phase II of

the Act required accounting for all other NPRI substances and the TRPs were prepared in 2013.

For De Beers Victor Mine, nineteen substances were determined to be subject to the Toxics

Reduction Act, and a total of seven Toxic Reduction Plans have been prepared. They include

dioxins and furans individual congeners, hexachlorobenzene (HCB), metals (arsenic, cadmium,

chromium, cobalt, copper, lead, manganese, nickel, selenium, vanadium and zinc),

phosphorous, carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides and particulate matter (TSP, PM10, and PM2.5).

The annual toxic substance accounting requirements were completed for the 2014 reporting

year, and this annual toxic substance accounting summary has been prepared in accordance

with the requirements of the Ontario Toxics Reduction Act and Ontario Regulation 455/09.

Further information on the Toxics Reduction Act is provided by the Ministry of the Environment

on their website www.ontario.ca/ministry-environment-and-climate-change.

TOXIC REDUCTION POLICY STATEMENT OF INTENT

De Beers Canada Inc., Victor Mine is committed to playing a leadership role in protecting the

environment. Wherever feasible, we will reduce the creation and discharge of toxic substances

in full compliance with all federal and provincial regulations. Our employees are encouraged to

participate in all types of toxic substance reduction activities. Toxic substance reduction will be

an ongoing effort at DeBeers, and we will continue to monitor advancements to ensure that

options that are both technologically and financially viable are implemented at our facility. No

current options were identified that are technically or economically feasible.

Page 2: ONTARIO TOXICS REDUCTION ACT/media/Files/D/De...Canada’s National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI) and O.Reg. 127/01. Forty-seven substances and substance groups were listed in

De Beers Victor Mine. – 2014 TRA Annual Report Summary 2 | P a g e

BASIC FACILITY INFORMATION

Company Name: DeBeers Canada Inc., Victor Mine

Contact Information: 119 Pine St. South, Suite 310, Timmins, ON. P4N 2K3

Highest Ranking Employee: James Kirby

Mine General Manager

416-645-3888 Ext. 2180

[email protected]

Technical Contacts: Terry Ternes P.Geo.

[email protected] 416-645-3888 ext 5779

Parent Company: De Beers Canada Inc.

100% ownership

Address: Suite 900 – 250 Ferrand Dr.

Toronto, Ontario

M3C 3G8

Business Number: 103749735

The facility’s NPRI ID: 10984

250 full time employees (equivalent).

Site Location (UTM Coordinates): Zone 17,304227 E and 5856029 N

The NAICS codes applicable to the facility are:

21 – Mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction

2123 – Non metallic mineral mining and quarrying

212392 – Diamond Mining

Page 3: ONTARIO TOXICS REDUCTION ACT/media/Files/D/De...Canada’s National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI) and O.Reg. 127/01. Forty-seven substances and substance groups were listed in

De Beers Victor Mine. – 2014 TRA Annual Report Summary 3 | P a g e

REDUCTION OBJECTIVES

Particulates (TPM, PM10, PM2.5)

There was no reduction option identified because there is no additional viable way of reducing

the creation of particulates. Particulates (TPM, PM10 and PM2.5) are primarily created and

released at the DeBeers Canada Inc. Victor Mine site through truck travel on unpaved roads for

hauling purposes. In addition, some small amounts of particulates are created and released

through combustion of fuel oil, incinerator use and primary and secondary crushing. DeBeers

already employs a fugitive dust management plan to minimize particulate emissions that

includes watering the unpaved roads, maintenance of the roads and speed limits. No further

reduction options have been considered because any further mitigation will only increase costs

while offering no viable payback.

Nitrogen Oxides

There was no reduction option identified because DeBeers is already improving their facility

operations to minimize the release of nitrogen oxides. Nitrogen oxides is primarily created and

released at the DeBeers Canada Inc. Victor Mine site during the use of emulsion explosives for

blasting and removing the ore. Emulsion explosives are widely used in the mining sector due

to their low cost, ease of use and the ability to work in wet environments. DeBeers already

employs a great deal of planning and scheduling to minimize the use and increase the efficiency

and effectiveness of the explosives. There are no viable alternatives to the use of emulsion

explosives based on cost and other viable explosives will create and release similar amounts of

nitrogen oxides.

Carbon Monoxide

There was no reduction option identified because DeBeers is already improving their facility

operations to minimize the release of carbon monoxide. Carbon monoxide is primarily created

and released at the DeBeers Canada Inc Victor Mine site during the use of emulsion explosives

for blasting and removing the ore. Emulsion explosives are widely used in the mining sector

due to their low cost, ease of use and the ability to work in wet environments. DeBeers already

employs a great deal of planning and scheduling to minimize the use and increase the efficiency

and effectiveness of the explosives. There are no viable alternatives to the use of emulsion

explosives based on cost and other viable explosives will create and release similar amounts of

carbon monoxide.

Metals (arsenic, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, copper, lead, manganese, nickel, selenium,

vanadium and zinc)

DeBeers does not intend to reduce the transfer of metals because these substances are

naturally occurring in ore from which diamonds are extracted and eventually disposed into the

onsite tailings management facility. The only way to reduce the amount of metals transferred to

the tailings facility would be to reduce the amount of ore processed, which could only be

obtained by reducing output and plant operations. DeBeers is committed to ensuring their

tailings transfers are handled in a safe and responsible manner. While DeBeers does not

intend to reduce the transfer of the aforementioned metals, technologies that may reduce the

releases to the environment of these substances will be monitored.

Page 4: ONTARIO TOXICS REDUCTION ACT/media/Files/D/De...Canada’s National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI) and O.Reg. 127/01. Forty-seven substances and substance groups were listed in

De Beers Victor Mine. – 2014 TRA Annual Report Summary 4 | P a g e

Dioxins and Furans, Hexachlorbenzene

There was no reduction option identified because there is no viable way of reducing use and

creation of Dioxins and Furans, and Hexachlorobenzene. Dioxins and furans and

Hexachlorobenzene are not brought into the site but are created and released during the

incineration of mine waste. In addition, the incinerator emissions have met the reporting criteria

for the Toxic Reduction Act, although at extremely low levels, because emissions below the

level of detection were required to be reported as if they were in fact occurring at the Method

Detection Limit. Consequently, there are few practical options for lowering the emissions

reported, which are for the most part not scientifically quantifiable.

DeBeers Canada Inc has made recent plant improvements. All employees at the Victor Mine

will be involved in waste reduction efforts. Waste Segregation will be one of our first priorities

for reduction. Our goal is to reduce the use of plastic substances where technically and

economically feasible. Steps taken include a reduction in plastic use and employee education

to help with waste segregation.

Phosphorus

DeBeers does not intend to reduce the transfer of phosphorus because it is naturally occurring

in ore from which diamonds are extracted and eventually disposed into the onsite tailings

management facility. The only way to reduce the amount of phosphorus transferred to the

tailings facility would be to reduce the amount of ore processed, which could only be obtained

by reducing output and plant operations. DeBeers is committed to ensuring their tailings

transfers are handled in a safe and responsible manner. While DeBeers does not intend to

reduce the transfer of phosphorus, technologies that may reduce the releases to the

environment of phosphorus will be monitored.

Page 5: ONTARIO TOXICS REDUCTION ACT/media/Files/D/De...Canada’s National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI) and O.Reg. 127/01. Forty-seven substances and substance groups were listed in

De Beers Victor Mine. – 2014 TRA Annual Report Summary 5 | P a g e

TOXIC SUBSTANCES

The site uses and emits thirteen Phase 1 MOE Toxic compounds and uses or emits six Phase 2

toxic compounds.

The nineteen MOE Toxic Compounds are listed below:

Chromium NA - 04

Cobalt NA - 05

Copper NA - 06

Manganese NA - 09

Nickel NA - 11

Vanadium 7440-62-2

Zinc NA - 14

Arsenic NA - 02

Cadmium NA - 03

Lead NA - 08

Selenium NA - 12

Dioxins and furans - total NA - D/F

Hexachlorobenzene 118-74-1

NOx 11104-93-1

CO 630-08-0

TPM N/A - M08

PM10 N/A - M09

PM2.5 N/A - M10

Phosphorus NA-22

A total of six Toxic Reduction Plans have been prepared. They include dioxins and furans

individual congeners, hexachlorobenzene (HCB), metals (arsenic, cadmium, chromium, cobalt,

copper, lead, manganese, nickel, selenium, vanadium and zinc), phosphorous, carbon

monoxide and particulate matter (TSP, PM10, and PM2.5).

TRACKING AND QUANTIFICATIONS

The method used to calculate the TRA quantifications was a combination of source testing

results, published emission factors and mass balance.

Table 1 is a summary of reported TRA quantities for the 2014 operational year. When compared

to the last reported values, overall there were no significant changes. The decrease in use and

Page 6: ONTARIO TOXICS REDUCTION ACT/media/Files/D/De...Canada’s National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI) and O.Reg. 127/01. Forty-seven substances and substance groups were listed in

De Beers Victor Mine. – 2014 TRA Annual Report Summary 6 | P a g e

creation of metals, dioxins and furans can be attributed to updated source testing results. The

change in reported values for carbon monoxide created can be attributed to an increase in AN

emulsified explosive use.

In the 2014 operational year, there were no out of the ordinary incidents or significant process

changes at the facility.

COMPARISION OF TRACKING AND QUANTIFICATION

No changes were made in the quantification and tracking methodology from 2013 to 2014.

DESCRIPTION OF STEPS TAKEN TO ACHIEVE OBJECTIVE AND ASSESS

EFFECTIVNESS

There was no technologically feasible reduction strategy objectives identified for De Beers

Canada Inc. and as such there was no economic feasibility study completed for the Phase I or

Phase 2 substances.

There are no objectives to track or reduction targets to evaluate.

Table 2 provides a summary of the facility TRA changes and updates which took place in 2014.

Page 7: ONTARIO TOXICS REDUCTION ACT/media/Files/D/De...Canada’s National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI) and O.Reg. 127/01. Forty-seven substances and substance groups were listed in

De Beers Victor Mine – 2014 TRA Annual Report Summary 7 | P a g e

Table 1: Comparison of Quantities Reported

Substance CAS

Description of Processes that Use

or Create Substance

Reporting under

NPRI Part

NPRI Threshold

2014 Used (tonnes)

2013 Used - Last

Reported Value

% Change 2014

Created (tonnes)

2013 Created -

Last Reported

Value

% Change

2014 Contained In Product (tonnes)

2013 Contained in Product

- Last Reported

Value

% Change Reason for Changes

Chromium NA - 04

Metals contained in Solid waste incinerated

Part 1

10 tonnes (MPO or

Transferred to Tailings)

>0-1 >0-1 -25.00 0 0 NA 0 0 NA Update to source testing

Cobalt NA - 05

Metals contained in Solid waste incinerated

Part 1

10 tonnes (MPO or

Transferred to Tailings)

0.0000 0.0000 0 0 0 NA 0 0 NA No significant change

Copper NA - 06

Metals contained in Solid waste incinerated

Part 1

10 tonnes (MPO or

Transferred to Tailings)

>0-1 >0-1 -52.63 0 0 NA 0 0 NA Update to source testing

Manganese NA - 09

Metals contained in Solid waste incinerated

Part 1

10 tonnes (MPO or

Transferred to Tailings)

>0-1 >0-1 -33.3 0 0 NA 0 0 NA update in source testing

Nickel NA - 11

Metals contained in Solid waste incinerated

Part 1

10 tonnes (MPO or

Transferred to Tailings)

>0-1 >0-1 -16.67 0 0 NA 0 0 NA update in source testing

Phosphorus NA-22

contained in Solid waste incinerated

Part 1

10 tonnes (MPO or

Transferred to Tailings)

>0-1 >0-1 0.00 0 0 NA 0 0 NA No significant change

Vanadium 7440-62-2

Metals contained in Solid waste incinerated

Part 1

10 tonnes (MPO or

Transferred to Tailings)

0 0 NA 0 0 NA 0 0 NA No significant change

Zinc NA - 14

Metals contained in Solid waste incinerated

Part 1

10 tonnes (MPO or

Transferred to Tailings)

>0-1 >0-1 -10.09 0 0 NA 0 0 NA Update to source testing

NOx 11104-93-1

Explosives use, Combustion

Part 4 20 tonnes (Release)

0 0 NA >10-100 >10-100 1.06 0 0 NA No significant change

CO 630-08-0

Explosives use, Combustion

Part 4 20 tonnes (Release)

0 0 NA >10-100 >10-100 22.99 0 0 NA Increased explosives use

TPM N/A - M08 Road dust Part 4

20 tonnes (Release)

0 0 NA >100-1000

>100-1000

-9.04 0 0 NA Slight decrease in vehicle

kms travelled

PM10 N/A - M09 Road dust Part 4

0.5 (Release)

0 0 NA >100-1000

>100-1000

-8.85 0 0 NA Slight decrease in vehicle

kms travelled

PM2.5 N/A - M10 Road dust Part 4

0.3 (Release)

0 0 NA >10-100 >10-100 -8.22 0 0 NA Slight decrease in vehicle

kms travelled

Page 8: ONTARIO TOXICS REDUCTION ACT/media/Files/D/De...Canada’s National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI) and O.Reg. 127/01. Forty-seven substances and substance groups were listed in

De Beers Victor Mine – 2014 TRA Annual Report Summary 8 | P a g e

Substance CAS

Description of Processes that Use

or Create Substance

Reporting under

NPRI Part

NPRI Threshold

2014 Used (tonnes)

2013 Used - Last

Reported Value

% Change 2014

Created (tonnes)

2013 Created -

Last Reported

Value

% Change

2014 Contained In Product (tonnes)

2013 Contained in Product

- Last Reported

Value

% Change Reason for Changes

Arsenic NA - 02

Metals contained in Solid waste incinerated

Part 1B 50 kg (MPO or contained in tailings)

>0-1 >0-1 0 0.00 0.00 NA 0 0 NA No significant change

Cadmium NA - 03

Metals contained in Solid waste incinerated

Part 1B

5 kg (MPO or

Transferred to Tailings)

>0-1 >0-1 66.67 0.00 0.00 NA 0 0 NA Increased loading to

incinerator and update to source testing

Lead NA - 08

Metals contained in Solid waste incinerated

Part 1B 50 kg (MPO or contained in tailings)

>0-1 >0-1 -48 0.00 0.00 NA 0 0 NA update in source testing

Selenium NA - 12

Metals contained in Solid waste incinerated

Part 1B

100 kg (MPO or

contained in tailings)

>0-1 >0-1 20 0.00 0.00 NA 0 0 NA Slight increase in loading

to the incinerator

Substance CAS

Description of Processes that Use

or Create Substance

Reporting under

NPRI Part

NPRI Threshold

2014 Used (tonnes)

2013 Used - Last

Reported Value

% Change 2014

Created (tonnes)

2013 Created -

Last Reported

Value

% Change

2014 Contained In Product (tonnes)

2013 Contained in Product

- Last Reported

Value

% Change Reason for Changes

1234678-HpCDD(Dioxin) 35822-46-9

Solid Waste Incineration

Part 3 Solid Waste Incineration

0 0 NA >0-1 >0-1 -77.70 0 0 NA update to source testing

1234678-HpCDF(Furan) 67562-39-4

Solid Waste Incineration

Part 3 Solid Waste Incineration

0 0 NA >0-1 >0-1 -69.55 0 0 NA update to source testing

1234789-HpCDF(Furan) 55673-89-7

Solid Waste Incineration

Part 3 Solid Waste Incineration

0 0 NA >0-1 >0-1 -65.42 0 0 NA update to source testing

123478-HxCDD(Dioxin) 39227-28-6

Solid Waste Incineration

Part 3 Solid Waste Incineration

0 0 NA >0-1 >0-1 -78.69 0 0 NA update to source testing

123478-HxCDF(Furan) 70648-26-9

Solid Waste Incineration

Part 3 Solid Waste Incineration

0 0 NA >0-1 >0-1 -67.11 0 0 NA update to source testing

123678-HxCDD(Dioxin) 57653-85-7

Solid Waste Incineration

Part 3 Solid Waste Incineration

0 0 NA >0-1 >0-1 -77.38 0 0 NA update to source testing

123678-HxCDF(Furan) 57117-44-9

Solid Waste Incineration

Part 3 Solid Waste Incineration

0 0 NA >0-1 >0-1 -67.88 0 0 NA update to source testing

123789-HxCDD(Dioxin) 19408-74-3

Solid Waste Incineration

Part 3 Solid Waste Incineration

0 0 NA >0-1 >0-1 -77.50 0 0 NA update to source testing

123789-HxCDF(Furan) 72918-21-9

Solid Waste Incineration

Part 3 Solid Waste Incineration

0 0 NA >0-1 >0-1 -50.0 0 0 NA update to source testing

Page 9: ONTARIO TOXICS REDUCTION ACT/media/Files/D/De...Canada’s National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI) and O.Reg. 127/01. Forty-seven substances and substance groups were listed in

De Beers Victor Mine – 2014 TRA Annual Report Summary 9 | P a g e

Substance CAS

Description of Processes that Use

or Create Substance

Reporting under

NPRI Part

NPRI Threshold

2014 Used (tonnes)

2013 Used - Last

Reported Value

% Change 2014

Created (tonnes)

2013 Created -

Last Reported

Value

% Change

2014 Contained In Product (tonnes)

2013 Contained in Product

- Last Reported

Value

% Change Reason for Changes

12378-PeCDD(Dioxin) 40321-76-4

Solid Waste Incineration

Part 3 Solid Waste Incineration

0 0 NA >0-1 >0-1 -76.83 0 0 NA update to source testing

12378-PeCDF(Furan) 57117-41-6

Solid Waste Incineration

Part 3 Solid Waste Incineration

0 0 NA >0-1 >0-1 -52.85 0 0 NA update to source testing

234678-HxCDF(Furan) 60851-34-5

Solid Waste Incineration

Part 3 Solid Waste Incineration

0 0 NA >0-1 >0-1 -59.42 0 0 NA update to source testing

23478-PeCDF(Furan) 57117-31-4

Solid Waste Incineration

Part 3 Solid Waste Incineration

0 0 NA >0-1 >0-1 -59.22 0 0 NA update to source testing

2378-TCDD(Dioxin) 1746-01-6

Solid Waste Incineration

Part 3 Solid Waste Incineration

0 0 NA >0-1 >0-1 -61.11 0 0 NA update to source testing

2378-TCDF(Furan) 51207-31-9

Solid Waste Incineration

Part 3 Solid Waste Incineration

0 0 NA >0-1 >1-10 -47.19 0 0 NA update to source testing

Octa CDD (Dioxin) 3268-87-9

Solid Waste Incineration

Part 3 Solid Waste Incineration

0 0 NA >0-1 >0-1 -76.37 0 0 NA update to source testing

Octa CDF (Furan) 39001-02-0

Solid Waste Incineration

Part 3 Solid Waste Incineration

0 0 NA >0-1 >0-1 -65.56 0 0 NA update to source testing

Hexachlorobenzene 118-74-1

Solid Waste Incineration

Part 3 Solid Waste Incineration

0 0 NA >0-1 >0-1 -3.70 0 0 NA No significant change

Page 10: ONTARIO TOXICS REDUCTION ACT/media/Files/D/De...Canada’s National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI) and O.Reg. 127/01. Forty-seven substances and substance groups were listed in

De Beers Victor Mine – 2014 TRA Annual Report Summary 10 | P a g e

Table 2: Changes in Quantifications, Quantities and Plan Updates

Substance CAS Quantification

Method(s) Used

Change in Quantification Method Used

Rationale for Using Selected Method(s)

Incidents out of the Ordinary

Significant Process Change

Objectives, Descriptions, Targets

Actions Amendments

Chromium NA - 04 Mass Balance/Source

Testing No change Most accurate method No No

No reduction options were identified to be both

technically and economically feasible.

Therefore, no options were chosen for implementation. None None

Cobalt NA - 05 Mass Balance/Source

Testing No change Most accurate method No No

No reduction options were identified to be both

technically and economically feasible.

Therefore, no options were chosen for implementation. None None

Copper NA - 06 Mass Balance/Source

Testing No change Most accurate method No No

No reduction options were identified to be both

technically and economically feasible.

Therefore, no options were chosen for implementation. None None

Manganese NA - 09 Mass Balance/Source

Testing No change Most accurate method No No

No reduction options were identified to be both

technically and economically feasible.

Therefore, no options were chosen for implementation. None None

Nickel NA - 11 Mass Balance/Source

Testing No change Most accurate method No No

No reduction options were identified to be both

technically and economically feasible.

Therefore, no options were chosen for implementation. None None

Phosphorus NA-22 Source Testing No change Most accurate method No No

No reduction options were identified to be both

technically and economically feasible.

Therefore, no options were chosen for implementation. None None

Vanadium 7440-62-2 Mass Balance/Source

Testing No change Most accurate method No No

No reduction options were identified to be both

technically and economically feasible.

Therefore, no options were chosen for implementation. None None

Page 11: ONTARIO TOXICS REDUCTION ACT/media/Files/D/De...Canada’s National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI) and O.Reg. 127/01. Forty-seven substances and substance groups were listed in

De Beers Victor Mine – 2014 TRA Annual Report Summary 11 | P a g e

Substance CAS Quantification

Method(s) Used

Change in Quantification Method Used

Rationale for Using Selected Method(s)

Incidents out of the Ordinary

Significant Process Change

Objectives, Descriptions, Targets

Actions Amendments

Zinc NA - 14 Mass Balance/Source

Testing No change Most accurate method No No

No reduction options were identified to be both

technically and economically feasible.

Therefore, no options were chosen for implementation. None None

NOx 11104-93-1 Emission Factors No change No site specific monitoring

data available No No

No reduction options were identified to be both

technically and economically feasible.

Therefore, no options were chosen for implementation. None None

CO 630-08-0 Emission Factors No change No site specific monitoring

data available No No

No reduction options were identified to be both

technically and economically feasible.

Therefore, no options were chosen for implementation. None None

TPM N/A - M08 Emission Factors No change No site specific monitoring

data available No No

No reduction options were identified to be both

technically and economically feasible.

Therefore, no options were chosen for implementation. None None

PM10 N/A - M09 Emission Factors No change No site specific monitoring

data available No No

No reduction options were identified to be both

technically and economically feasible.

Therefore, no options were chosen for implementation. None None

PM2.5 N/A - M10 Emission Factors No change No site specific monitoring

data available No No

No reduction options were identified to be both

technically and economically feasible.

Therefore, no options were chosen for implementation. None None

Arsenic NA - 02 Source Testing No change Most accurate method No No

No reduction options were identified to be both

technically and economically feasible.

Therefore, no options were chosen for implementation. None None

Page 12: ONTARIO TOXICS REDUCTION ACT/media/Files/D/De...Canada’s National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI) and O.Reg. 127/01. Forty-seven substances and substance groups were listed in

De Beers Victor Mine – 2014 TRA Annual Report Summary 12 | P a g e

Substance CAS Quantification

Method(s) Used

Change in Quantification Method Used

Rationale for Using Selected Method(s)

Incidents out of the Ordinary

Significant Process Change

Objectives, Descriptions, Targets

Actions Amendments

Cadmium NA - 03 Mass Balance/Source

Testing No change Most accurate method No No

No reduction options were identified to be both

technically and economically feasible.

Therefore, no options were chosen for implementation. None None

Lead NA - 08 Mass Balance/Source

Testing No change Most accurate method No No

No reduction options were identified to be both

technically and economically feasible.

Therefore, no options were chosen for implementation. None None

Selenium NA - 12 Source Testing No change Most accurate method No No

No reduction options were identified to be both

technically and economically feasible.

Therefore, no options were chosen for implementation. None None

1234678-HpCDD(Dioxin) 35822-46-9 Source Testing No change Most accurate method No No

No reduction options were identified to be both

technically and economically feasible.

Therefore, no options were chosen for implementation. None None

1234678-HpCDF(Furan) 67562-39-4 Source Testing No change Most accurate method No No

No reduction options were identified to be both

technically and economically feasible.

Therefore, no options were chosen for implementation. None None

1234789-HpCDF(Furan) 55673-89-7 Source Testing No change Most accurate method No No

No reduction options were identified to be both

technically and economically feasible.

Therefore, no options were chosen for implementation. None None

123478-HxCDD(Dioxin) 39227-28-6 Source Testing No change Most accurate method No No

No reduction options were identified to be both

technically and economically feasible.

Therefore, no options were chosen for implementation. None None

Page 13: ONTARIO TOXICS REDUCTION ACT/media/Files/D/De...Canada’s National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI) and O.Reg. 127/01. Forty-seven substances and substance groups were listed in

De Beers Victor Mine – 2014 TRA Annual Report Summary 13 | P a g e

Substance CAS Quantification

Method(s) Used

Change in Quantification Method Used

Rationale for Using Selected Method(s)

Incidents out of the Ordinary

Significant Process Change

Objectives, Descriptions, Targets

Actions Amendments

123478-HxCDF(Furan) 70648-26-9 Source Testing No change Most accurate method No No

No reduction options were identified to be both

technically and economically feasible.

Therefore, no options were chosen for implementation. None None

123678-HxCDD(Dioxin) 57653-85-7 Source Testing No change Most accurate method No No

No reduction options were identified to be both

technically and economically feasible.

Therefore, no options were chosen for implementation. None None

123678-HxCDF(Furan) 57117-44-9 Source Testing No change Most accurate method No No

No reduction options were identified to be both

technically and economically feasible.

Therefore, no options were chosen for implementation. None None

123789-HxCDD(Dioxin) 19408-74-3 Source Testing No change Most accurate method No No

No reduction options were identified to be both

technically and economically feasible.

Therefore, no options were chosen for implementation. None None

123789-HxCDF(Furan) 72918-21-9 Source Testing No change Most accurate method No No

No reduction options were identified to be both

technically and economically feasible.

Therefore, no options were chosen for implementation. None None

12378-PeCDD(Dioxin) 40321-76-4 Source Testing No change Most accurate method No No

No reduction options were identified to be both

technically and economically feasible.

Therefore, no options were chosen for implementation. None None

12378-PeCDF(Furan) 57117-41-6 Source Testing No change Most accurate method No No

No reduction options were identified to be both

technically and economically feasible.

Therefore, no options were chosen for implementation. None None

Page 14: ONTARIO TOXICS REDUCTION ACT/media/Files/D/De...Canada’s National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI) and O.Reg. 127/01. Forty-seven substances and substance groups were listed in

De Beers Victor Mine – 2014 TRA Annual Report Summary 14 | P a g e

Substance CAS Quantification

Method(s) Used

Change in Quantification Method Used

Rationale for Using Selected Method(s)

Incidents out of the Ordinary

Significant Process Change

Objectives, Descriptions, Targets

Actions Amendments

234678-HxCDF(Furan) 60851-34-5 Source Testing No change Most accurate method No No

No reduction options were identified to be both

technically and economically feasible.

Therefore, no options were chosen for implementation. None None

23478-PeCDF(Furan) 57117-31-4 Source Testing No change Most accurate method No No

No reduction options were identified to be both

technically and economically feasible.

Therefore, no options were chosen for implementation. None None

2378-TCDD(Dioxin) 1746-01-6 Source Testing No change Most accurate method No No

No reduction options were identified to be both

technically and economically feasible.

Therefore, no options were chosen for implementation. None None

2378-TCDF(Furan) 51207-31-9 Source Testing No change Most accurate method No No

No reduction options were identified to be both

technically and economically feasible.

Therefore, no options were chosen for implementation. None None

Octa CDD (Dioxin) 3268-87-9 Source Testing No change Most accurate method No No

No reduction options were identified to be both

technically and economically feasible.

Therefore, no options were chosen for implementation. None None

Octa CDF (Furan) 39001-02-0 Source Testing No change Most accurate method No No

No reduction options were identified to be both

technically and economically feasible.

Therefore, no options were chosen for implementation. None None

Hexachlorobenzene 118-74-1 Source Testing No change Most accurate method No No

No reduction options were identified to be both

technically and economically feasible.

Therefore, no options were chosen for implementation. None None

Page 15: ONTARIO TOXICS REDUCTION ACT/media/Files/D/De...Canada’s National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI) and O.Reg. 127/01. Forty-seven substances and substance groups were listed in

De Beers Victor Mine. – 2014 TRA Annual Report Summary 15 | P a g e

CERTIFICATIONS BY HIGHEST RANKING OFFICIAL

Page 16: ONTARIO TOXICS REDUCTION ACT/media/Files/D/De...Canada’s National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI) and O.Reg. 127/01. Forty-seven substances and substance groups were listed in

De Beers Victor Mine. – 2014 TRA Annual Report Summary 16 | P a g e

Page 17: ONTARIO TOXICS REDUCTION ACT/media/Files/D/De...Canada’s National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI) and O.Reg. 127/01. Forty-seven substances and substance groups were listed in

De Beers Victor Mine. – 2014 TRA Annual Report Summary 17 | P a g e