oocyte and embryo selection using sequential embryo selection (ses) lynette scott fertility centers...

31
Oocyte and Embryo Selection using Sequential Embryo Selection (SES) Lynette Scott Fertility Centers of New England Reading, MA, USA

Upload: norah-atkins

Post on 20-Jan-2016

221 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Oocyte and Embryo Selection using Sequential Embryo Selection (SES) Lynette Scott Fertility Centers of New England Reading, MA, USA

Oocyte and Embryo Selectionusing

Sequential Embryo Selection (SES)

Lynette Scott

Fertility Centers of New England

Reading, MA, USA

Page 2: Oocyte and Embryo Selection using Sequential Embryo Selection (SES) Lynette Scott Fertility Centers of New England Reading, MA, USA

Early embryo parameters may be a window back to the gametes

Abnormal gametes generally do not produce normal embryos

Later development reflects gene expression, differentiation, developmental controls

Day 1and

Day 2

Gametes

Differentiation

Day 3 Day 5

Page 3: Oocyte and Embryo Selection using Sequential Embryo Selection (SES) Lynette Scott Fertility Centers of New England Reading, MA, USA

Human Oocyte

CumulusCells-NO-gene up/downregulation-

Oocyte-Mt load-cAMP-nuclear/Cytopasmicmaturation

Page 4: Oocyte and Embryo Selection using Sequential Embryo Selection (SES) Lynette Scott Fertility Centers of New England Reading, MA, USA

Zona Pellucida

Laid down by the oocyte so could reflect oocyte quality

Can be visualized and measured using polarized light microscopy

2 systems:A- measures zona density B- measures differential zona layers and

thickness

Page 5: Oocyte and Embryo Selection using Sequential Embryo Selection (SES) Lynette Scott Fertility Centers of New England Reading, MA, USA

Porous surface of the zona pellucida

Page 6: Oocyte and Embryo Selection using Sequential Embryo Selection (SES) Lynette Scott Fertility Centers of New England Reading, MA, USA

Zona Density, Alignment, Abnormalities

Courtesy of Marcus Montag

LayersAlignment

Page 7: Oocyte and Embryo Selection using Sequential Embryo Selection (SES) Lynette Scott Fertility Centers of New England Reading, MA, USA

Spindle• Visualized using polarized light microscopy• Position- should be in the hemisphere

containing the polar body• The shape of the spindle is more important

– Should be bi-polar and ordered

• Correlations with oocyte competence• Draw backs:

– 98% of spindles are in the correct position– The spindle is very dynamic and temperature

sensitive, forming and dismantling in cycles and with temperature drops. The oocyte must also be very carefully positioned for accurate visualization.

– Only true irregularities = abnormal

Page 8: Oocyte and Embryo Selection using Sequential Embryo Selection (SES) Lynette Scott Fertility Centers of New England Reading, MA, USA

Metaphase II Spindle

Courtesy of Laura Rienzi

Note Spindle Alignment

And Zona Alignment

Page 9: Oocyte and Embryo Selection using Sequential Embryo Selection (SES) Lynette Scott Fertility Centers of New England Reading, MA, USA

Courtesy of David Keefe

Abnormal Spindle Shapes

Page 10: Oocyte and Embryo Selection using Sequential Embryo Selection (SES) Lynette Scott Fertility Centers of New England Reading, MA, USA

Fertilized Oocyte ScoringLooks at a part of nucleoli in

the early embryo

Nucleoli Found in all actively dividing cells Sites of rRNA synthesis Develop on the DNA where the genes for ribosomes are

located, rDNA These points on the DNA = NORs

Nucleolar Organizing Regions

Page 11: Oocyte and Embryo Selection using Sequential Embryo Selection (SES) Lynette Scott Fertility Centers of New England Reading, MA, USA

Human NORs 5 pairs of NOR-bearing chromosomes

– 13, 14, 15, 21, 22 (acrocentric)

Generally 5-7 NORs in human cells• NOR’s are clustered and this is dependent on heterochromatin

adjacent to rDNA genes Heterochromatin is not inactive and may be involved in

developmental control (Dimitri, 2004)

• Transcription of rDNA results in 3 functional parts:

Page 12: Oocyte and Embryo Selection using Sequential Embryo Selection (SES) Lynette Scott Fertility Centers of New England Reading, MA, USA

Nucleolar Precursor Body (NPB) Pattern

15 4 2

Z1

Z2

OA

OB

Z3-1 Z3-2Z3-3 Z3-4

Abnormal = any inequality

Normal = equality between nuclei

Page 13: Oocyte and Embryo Selection using Sequential Embryo Selection (SES) Lynette Scott Fertility Centers of New England Reading, MA, USA

L = 5 R = 6 L = 4 R = 4

NPB RATIO

Page 14: Oocyte and Embryo Selection using Sequential Embryo Selection (SES) Lynette Scott Fertility Centers of New England Reading, MA, USA

NPB Ratio vs. Outcome

ALL ET Not Preg

Preg FHB 100% Implant

>12 weeks

L/R 4/9 5/8 4/9 5/7 6/7 6/7 6/7

Range 1-15 2-10 2-10 4-9 5-9 5-7 6-7

P<0.05

Page 15: Oocyte and Embryo Selection using Sequential Embryo Selection (SES) Lynette Scott Fertility Centers of New England Reading, MA, USA

Fibrillar component and center

Dense fibrillar component

Granular component

Condensed chromatin

Pre-RNA

RNA Polymerase

NPB

13, 14, 15, 21, 22

Page 16: Oocyte and Embryo Selection using Sequential Embryo Selection (SES) Lynette Scott Fertility Centers of New England Reading, MA, USA

L = 5 R = 6

NPB IN FERTILIZED OOCYTES

NPB

Looking at chromatin13, 14, 15, 21, 22

Page 17: Oocyte and Embryo Selection using Sequential Embryo Selection (SES) Lynette Scott Fertility Centers of New England Reading, MA, USA

Evidence for epigenetic/ imprinting errors in these oocytesSperm or oocyte?NPBs associated with imprinting errors, heterochromatin

Page 18: Oocyte and Embryo Selection using Sequential Embryo Selection (SES) Lynette Scott Fertility Centers of New England Reading, MA, USA

Embryo XY 13 15 16 17 18 21 22 interpretation 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 2 2 complex 2 X0 1 1 1 1 0 2 1 complex 3 X0 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 complex 4 0 0 2 1 1 1 1 1 complex 5 XXY 2 3 2 1 1 1 1 complex 6 XX 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 complex 7 XY 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 complex

34 yr old, GO, POSever male factor, Sperm problem not an egg one6 IVF attempts, no pregnancy, 2 PGD, no normal’s

1 DI attempt, Term delivery,3628 gr male

Page 19: Oocyte and Embryo Selection using Sequential Embryo Selection (SES) Lynette Scott Fertility Centers of New England Reading, MA, USA

Day 2 Scoring• Cell number

• Blastomere relative size

• Status of nucleation

• Fragmentation

• Timing is important

Page 20: Oocyte and Embryo Selection using Sequential Embryo Selection (SES) Lynette Scott Fertility Centers of New England Reading, MA, USA

Day 2 Cell SizeWhy is it important?

• Polarity

• Distribution of cell components

• Embryo axes

• The meiotic and mitotic spindle

Page 21: Oocyte and Embryo Selection using Sequential Embryo Selection (SES) Lynette Scott Fertility Centers of New England Reading, MA, USA

MULTI-NUCLEATION and CELL SIZE

30%

Page 22: Oocyte and Embryo Selection using Sequential Embryo Selection (SES) Lynette Scott Fertility Centers of New England Reading, MA, USA

4-cell Blastomer Morphology

Small

30%

Rosette

Page 23: Oocyte and Embryo Selection using Sequential Embryo Selection (SES) Lynette Scott Fertility Centers of New England Reading, MA, USA

Day 1 Day 3Day 2

Polyploid

Complex Abnormal

Page 24: Oocyte and Embryo Selection using Sequential Embryo Selection (SES) Lynette Scott Fertility Centers of New England Reading, MA, USA

Day 1 and Day 2 Correlations

Page 25: Oocyte and Embryo Selection using Sequential Embryo Selection (SES) Lynette Scott Fertility Centers of New England Reading, MA, USA

Deliveries according to early morphometrics

Scott et al., 2007

Page 26: Oocyte and Embryo Selection using Sequential Embryo Selection (SES) Lynette Scott Fertility Centers of New England Reading, MA, USA

Day 3 Cell Number

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

All ET NEG POS FHB 100%

7-8 cell5-8 cell

P<0.05

Page 27: Oocyte and Embryo Selection using Sequential Embryo Selection (SES) Lynette Scott Fertility Centers of New England Reading, MA, USA

Z Score, Z1 and 2 (P<0.01)NPB Ratio, 5-7 per nucleus (P<0.001)*

Day 2 score highly significant (P<0.01)Even cell size (P<0.001)*No multi nucleation (P<0.001)*

– 4 cell best (better than 2-cell, 3 cell reduced FHB, no delivery) (P<0.05)

Day 3 score, 8 cell is best (P<0.05)

Early Scoring ParametersSignificant for Delivery

Scott et al., 2007

Page 28: Oocyte and Embryo Selection using Sequential Embryo Selection (SES) Lynette Scott Fertility Centers of New England Reading, MA, USA

Early Scores and Delivery

Scott et al. 2007

Page 29: Oocyte and Embryo Selection using Sequential Embryo Selection (SES) Lynette Scott Fertility Centers of New England Reading, MA, USA

Complex Abnormal

MN

MN

Good Grade 8-cell Good Blastocyst (D6)

XXXY1x 161x 213x 220x 15

Page 30: Oocyte and Embryo Selection using Sequential Embryo Selection (SES) Lynette Scott Fertility Centers of New England Reading, MA, USA

SEQUENTIAL SELECTION

Accept that “pretty” good

Use biologic criteria and not only morphology In gated scoring, an embryo that does not pass through the

first gate must not be selected at the second level, regardless of morphology

If it does not pass the 2nd gate it should be discarded, as this is the most NB criteria

Page 31: Oocyte and Embryo Selection using Sequential Embryo Selection (SES) Lynette Scott Fertility Centers of New England Reading, MA, USA

Introduction and use of SESImpact on Delivery Rates

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

<38 38-40 Total

200520062007

5%

2%

1%

2.4

1.9*2.1

2.22.5

2.1

* Mean # ET 2.1 Twin Rate 30-40%

% D

eliv

ery/

>20

wee

ks