oocyte donation: controversial issues in clinical practice

29
Upcoming challenges, Leiderdorp, 04.10.2013 1 Oocyte donation: controversial issues in clinical practice. Results in a program of reciprocal donation. Henk Ruis MD, Obst & Gyn, PhD, CEO Stg Geertgen Behandelcentum Stg Geertgen, Elsendorp

Upload: nedra

Post on 23-Feb-2016

108 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Oocyte donation: controversial issues in clinical practice. Results in a program of reciprocal donation. Henk Ruis MD, Obst & Gyn , PhD , CEO Stg Geertgen Behandelcentum Stg Geertgen, Elsendorp. Conflict of interest: none. F ramework for gamete donation. EU Tissue Directive - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Oocyte donation:  controversial  issues in clinical practice

1Upcoming challenges, Leiderdorp, 04.10.2013

Oocyte donation: controversial issues in clinical practice.

Results in a program of reciprocal donation.

Henk RuisMD, Obst & Gyn, PhD, CEO Stg Geertgen

Behandelcentum Stg Geertgen, Elsendorp

Page 2: Oocyte donation:  controversial  issues in clinical practice

2

Conflict of interest: none

Upcoming challenges, Leiderdorp, 04.10.2013

Page 6: Oocyte donation:  controversial  issues in clinical practice

6

Types of gamete donation

• Altruistic donation• Donation with payment to donor• Sharing• Reciprocal donation – ‘wederkerigheid’

Upcoming challenges, Leiderdorp, 04.10.2013

Page 7: Oocyte donation:  controversial  issues in clinical practice

7

Reciprocity – wederkerigheid

• Reciprocity refers to responding to a positive action with another positive action, rewarding kind actions

• Wederkerigheid is de onderlinge verplichting binnen een relatie om een gift te beantwoorden met een tegengift

• Cooperative reciprocal tendencies i.e. inclinations to give back in a cooperative manner, are called positive reciprocity.

Upcoming challenges, Leiderdorp, 04.10.2013

Page 8: Oocyte donation:  controversial  issues in clinical practice

8

Solidarity Vertical

Health Insurance system in Netherlands• State controled mandatory health insurance• ‘General Law on Exceptional Healthcare Costs’• Premiums may not be related to health status or age• Risk equalisation with a common risk pool.

Upcoming challenges, Leiderdorp, 04.10.2013

Page 9: Oocyte donation:  controversial  issues in clinical practice

9

Reciprocity A form of horizontal solidarity

Local Exchange Trading System – LETS

• Is a locally initiated, democratically organised, not-for-profit community enterprise that provides a community information service and record transactions of members exchanging goods and services by using the currency of locally created LETS Credits.

• For instance, a member may earn credit by doing childcare for one person and spend it later on carpentry with another person in the same network.

Upcoming challenges, Leiderdorp, 04.10.2013

Page 10: Oocyte donation:  controversial  issues in clinical practice

10

Donation of gametes

• No provisions for donation of gametes by government

• Historicaly shortage of donors and donor material• At time of change from A to B donors: Minister of

Health promised to facilitate the recruitment of donors

• Limited to production of 2 information flyers : one for donors and one for recipients

Upcoming challenges, Leiderdorp, 04.10.2013

Page 11: Oocyte donation:  controversial  issues in clinical practice

11

Donation of gametes

Donor recruitment

private initiative is necessary

Upcoming challenges, Leiderdorp, 04.10.2013

Page 12: Oocyte donation:  controversial  issues in clinical practice

12

Donation of gametesReciprocity system

One patient is in need of donor sperm Other patient is in need of donor oocytes

Reciprocity system - ‘wederkerigheid’

Upcoming challenges, Leiderdorp, 04.10.2013

Bank

Page 13: Oocyte donation:  controversial  issues in clinical practice

13

Donation of gametes:Is there a need?

The primary recipients of donor sperm are

• heterosexual couples suffering from severe male infertility

• lesbian couples• single women

Upcoming challenges, Leiderdorp, 04.10.2013

Page 14: Oocyte donation:  controversial  issues in clinical practice

14

Donation of gametes:Is there a need?

The primary recipients of donor sperm at Stg Geertgen are

• heterosexual couples suffering from severe male infertility - 1/3

• lesbian couples - 1/3• single women - 1/3

For use in IUI or IVF/ICSI

Upcoming challenges, Leiderdorp, 04.10.2013

Page 15: Oocyte donation:  controversial  issues in clinical practice

15

Donation of gametesSperm donation at Stg Geertgen

• 30% of patients bring own sperm donor• 30% of patients use sperm from Stg Geertgen

altruistic sperm donor bank• 20% of patients use sperm from external donor bank• 20% participate in reciprocity system

Upcoming challenges, Leiderdorp, 04.10.2013

Page 16: Oocyte donation:  controversial  issues in clinical practice

16

Donation of gametes:Is there a need?

The primary recipients of oocyte donation at Stg Geertgen are

• Patients suffering from severe female infertilityeg. POF, genetic indication

• Intra-relational donation - lesbian couples

For use in IVF/ICSI

Upcoming challenges, Leiderdorp, 04.10.2013

Page 17: Oocyte donation:  controversial  issues in clinical practice

17

Donation of gametesOocyte donation at Stg Geertgen

• 50% of patients bring own oocyte donor• 50% by reciprocity system

Upcoming challenges, Leiderdorp, 04.10.2013

Page 18: Oocyte donation:  controversial  issues in clinical practice

18

Donation of gametes: Sperm - oocytes

Stg Geertgen in 2012

Only 30% of need for donor semen is fullfilled by reciprocity

Sperm donor from bank is a realistic option

More requests for oocytes through reciprocity than offered

Donor oocytes from bank is currently not a real option

Upcoming challenges, Leiderdorp, 04.10.2013

Page 19: Oocyte donation:  controversial  issues in clinical practice

19

Donation of gametes

• Free choice to become a donor• Counseling by fertility specialist – risks of treatment

• Counseling by fertility psychologist– implications of donation – B donor – psychosocial stability

• Donor participating in reciprocity: extra counseling• Sign inform consent

Upcoming challenges, Leiderdorp, 04.10.2013

Page 20: Oocyte donation:  controversial  issues in clinical practice

20

Donation of gametes

• Maximum age =– 37 years– ±50 years

• Psychosocial stable person• Serological tests ok• Genetics ok• Healthy life style ok

Upcoming challenges, Leiderdorp, 04.10.2013

Page 21: Oocyte donation:  controversial  issues in clinical practice

21

Donation of gametes: is there a need? Results with natural cycle Donor IUI

Stg Geertgen in 2012

Upcoming challenges, Leiderdorp, 04.10.2013

Donor IUI 2012 Donor IUI 2013 (1-5)

Number of cycles 2257 785

Pregnant per cycle 227 10,1% 82 10,3%

Ongoing pregnancy rate per cycle 157 6,9% 65/695 9,4%

Page 22: Oocyte donation:  controversial  issues in clinical practice

22

Donation of gametes: is there a need? Results with Donor oocytes - freeze/thaw of embryos

Stg Geertgen in 2012

Upcoming challenges, Leiderdorp, 04.10.2013

Number of cycles

Number of

patients

Number of embryos thawed % Survival

Mean numebr of embryos per

thawingNumber of transfers

Mean number of embryos per

ET

% Clinical pregnancy rate

per transferMiscarriage

rate

Stg Geertgen 238 123 301 235 78,1% 1,1 (1-4) 209 1,1 (1-2)25

11,9% 30,6%

Landelijke registratie 7513

112415% 32,6%

Page 23: Oocyte donation:  controversial  issues in clinical practice

23

Reciprocity

Upcoming challenges, Leiderdorp, 04.10.2013

Not a free system. Voluntary and informed choice

All information concerning reciprocity is published on website and in brochure

Stg Geertgen is open and clear about the reciprocity system

Page 24: Oocyte donation:  controversial  issues in clinical practice

24

Reciprocity

Upcoming challenges, Leiderdorp, 04.10.2013

Reciprocity is undermining national (vertical) solidarity system of health care.

“Het systeem van ‘faire wederkerigheid’ ….. . Als het echter gaat om het doneren van geslachtscellen lijkt de rol van de overheid eerder beperkend dan stimulerend.” Minister van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport, mw. drs. E.I. Schippers 11.07.2013

Page 25: Oocyte donation:  controversial  issues in clinical practice

25

Reciprocity

Upcoming challenges, Leiderdorp, 04.10.2013

Recipient is pregnant, but donor is not.

This is of course possible, this issue is discussed in detail during cousneling sessions with psychologist and fertility specialist. If issue is not accepted by patient, treatment will not commence.Stg Geertgen 2012 - 2013• 10 donors are not pregnant but are

still undergoing treatment• 2 stopped treatment • 1 couple received oocytes resulting in

pregnancy but partner semen was never donated to bank

Page 26: Oocyte donation:  controversial  issues in clinical practice

26

Reciprocity

• No need for fertility tourism• Reduce time ‘start to treat’ (<3 months)• ‘Matching’ of donor and recipient is possible• Outcomes are good• Patient is in charge of treatment• Accepted by society• Acceptance by professional body is growing

Upcoming challenges, Leiderdorp, 04.10.2013

Page 27: Oocyte donation:  controversial  issues in clinical practice

27

Reciprocity

• Number of patients that will enrole in reciprocity donation system is limited

• Banking of donor oocytes by vitrification will change strategy

• Use of vitrified oocytes from ‘donor oocyte bank’ will result in less oocytes necessary per recipient

• Cost reduction through ‘donor oocyte bank’• Follow up of children and families in reciprocal donation

program is mandatory

Upcoming challenges, Leiderdorp, 04.10.2013

Page 28: Oocyte donation:  controversial  issues in clinical practice

28

Teamwork Behandelcentrum Stg Geertgen

Pater Rossaertstraat 3 - 5424 TG Elsendorp

Directie- Henk Ruis - algemeen directeur- Han Michgelsen - medisch directeur- Erik Unterhorst - directeur laboratorium- Bas Ruis - directeur beheer

Gynaecologen- Carola Backx- Eric Mendels - Han Michgelsen - Henk Ruis

Fertiliteitsartsen- Daniëlle Bax- Marieke van den Broek- Frank van Heerebeek- Mathilde Kuijpers- Dolf Wissmann

Psychologen- Martje Ubbens- Marloes Verhulst- Judith Zegers

Gespecialiseerd verpleegkundigen- Corine Aldenzee- Veronique de Brouwer- Judith Dongelmans - Kristel van Lieverloo- Marie-Louise van de Loo- Dorien Philipsen- Jeanne van Santvoort- Simone Verboven- Tiny Wagemaker- Brigitte van den Woldenberg- Brigitte Zimmerman

Secretariaat- Ad de Beer- Anky Buijs- Anja Hezemans- Susan Hoevenaars- Lia Scheltenaar- Gerda Schrauwen

Medisch receptionistes- Karin van Dommelen- Judith Drouen- Hilke van Duijnhoven- Hilde van Heck- Rodette Janssen- Karin Leenders- Astrid Michiels- Marianne Peeters- Stefanie Sam- Ine Schepers- Judith de Visser

Sr Klinisch embryologen- Erik Unterhorst- Martine Nijs

Andrologie Analisten - Marianne Huijbers- Linsey van Lieverloo- Rita Martens- Roger van de Wetering- Peter Wiering

IVF-analisten- Dorien van der Heijden- Corlinda Martens- Marleen Sevenster

Upcoming challenges, Leiderdorp, 04.10.2013

Donorenbegeleiding- Dirk van Bragt- Bauke Geeris

Doktersassistentes- Suzan Klomp- Monica van Os

Apotheker- Pieter Weerts

Apothekersassistentes- Petra Coopmans- Thea Muijsers- Annette Roelands- Antonie van de Ven- Heidi Vereijken Facilitair medewerksters- Joke Bekx- Tini van Berlo- Thea van der Cruijsen- Karin Sterken - Stella van Tilborg- Ingrid Verwegen

Kwaliteitsmedewerkers- Sharon de Bruin - Anneke van Dommelen - Frenk Habraken - concierge - Martine Nijs - wetenschappelijk adviseur- Janine Ruis - juridisch medewerker- Marcel Ruis- human resources manager- Tina Ruis – patientenbegeleiding - donatie

Page 29: Oocyte donation:  controversial  issues in clinical practice

29

Thank you!

Upcoming challenges, Leiderdorp, 04.10.2013