Please fill out requested information in all gray boxes

Title:

Proponent(s):

Keywords: (5 or less)

Area:

Contact Information:

Contact Person: Department:

Organization: Address

Tel.: Fax: E-mail:

Permission to post abstract on ORION Web site: Yes No

Abstract: (400 words or less)

OOI RFA Cover Sheet LOI Full Addendum

Above For Office Use Only

Please describe below key non-standard measurement technology needed to achieve the proposed scientific objectives: (250 words or less)

Proposed Sites: Proposed Duration

Site Name Position Water Depth (m)

Start Date

Deploy (months)

Revisits during

deployment

Site-specific Comments

List of Project Participants

Suggested Reviewers

1. Introduction Estuary mouths are critical gateways for the exchange of material between the terrestrial and marine environments. The transport and transformation of carbon through the estuarine and inner-shelf environments may represent a mass flux of global significance (Frankignoulle et al. 1998, Cole and Caraco 2001, Richey 2004). The life cycles of many key resource species involve passage between estuarine and marine environments, and the exchange processes at the mouths of estuaries may represent a major cause of interannual variability of recruitment (Ellien et al. 2004). Estuary mouths are choke-points through which anthropogenic impacts are funneled to the marine environment, including excessive nutrient loading, contaminants, and turbidity associated with poor land use. The physical dynamics and ecology of the continental shelf are significantly influenced by the freshwater outflow from estuaries and the associated transport of nutrients, contaminants, particles and organisms. However the mechanisms of dispersal and their contributions to the overall structure and dynamics of the continental shelf are now just beginning to be understood. This planning document addresses a suite of scientific issues related to the exchange processes between the estuarine and coastal environments. The proposal focuses on the mid-Atlantic bight, the coastal domain between Cape Cod and Cape Hatteras, which includes 4 major estuarine systems: the Connecticut River/Long Island Sound, the Hudson River/New York Harbor, Delaware Bay, and Chesapeake Bay. The research topics and methodologies described here have application to other environments as well, but there are certain attributes of the mid-Atlantic bight that are of particular scientific interest as well as some favorable logistical considerations. The mid-Atlantic bight has several prominent estuaries, with comparable discharge rates but distinct variations in geometry and mouth outflow conditions. The watersheds of these estuaries include the most heavily populated regions in the United States, thus the outflows carry a strong anthropogenic signal. The planktonic larval fauna of these estuaries have been studied extensively, but the exchange among these populations has only recently received attention (e.g., Thorrold et al. 2003). The wide East-Coast shelf buffers the coastal waters via sheltering from oceanic exchange, resulting in more relative significance of the coastal sources of freshwater, nutrients and other chemical constituents. The mid-Atlantic bight presently includes several coastal observatories, and there are proposed plans to enhance the capabilities of these facilities with the support of the ORION program.

2. Scientific Objectives and Rationale This proposal includes research elements spanning several disciplines. The topics are inter-related, both in terms of the underlying processes and with respect to the methodologies for addressing them. Notwithstanding the inherent interdisciplinary connections between the topics, the research themes can be grouped in three general categories: [1] physical transport and exchange processes; [2] biogeochemical transport and transformation; and [3] retention and dispersal of organisms. The following sections develop these themes and indicate the importance of coastal observatory facilities for the successful accomplishment of the science. The final section of the proposal describes the logistics of implementing these research elements within the framework of the ORION coastal observatory network.

1

2.1 Physical Transport and Exchange Processes This proposal addresses three interrelated aspects of the physical transport between estuaries and the continental margin. The first is an examination of the local exchange mechanisms in the vicinity of the estuary mouth, a complex region in which tidal motions, hydraulic exchange flows, buoyancy-driven flows, and inner-shelf circulation processes all affect the net exchange between the estuary and the continental shelf. The second is an examination of the processes that control the dispersal patterns of buoyant plumes over the continental shelf. The third is a study of particulate fluxes from land to sea, considering interannual variability in trapping and transport and the influence of extreme events. The three components of the physical transport studies are part of a continuum of processes, and they have overlapping observational approaches.

2.1.1 Exchange Processes at the Estuary Mouth The processes governing water mass exchange at an estuarine mouth are fundamentally important to the near-field coastal ocean because these processes set the salinity of the transformed fresh water entering the ocean. In addition, they determine the rate of exchange of water-borne materials (plankton, nutrients, carbon, pollutants) between the estuary and ocean. Steady state models predict that both the exchange rate and outflow salinities have a maximum theoretical value (maximal exchange) that is determined simply by estuarine geometry and fresh water fluxes (Stommel and Farmer, 1953). Moreover, even when the exchange flow is sub-maximal, geometry and river-discharge appear to determine exchange rate and outflowing salinity (Hetland and Geyer, 2004). It has yet to be shown if maximal exchange theory ever holds in real estuaries. Furthermore, analytical and numerical studies indicate that steady state theories are not valid and can grossly misrepresent the estuarine structure and exchange rate, when estuarine forcing varies with time (Kranenburg, 1986; MacCready, 1999; Hetland and Geyer, 2004). In well-mixed estuaries with large tides, exchange may be determined by the asymmetry in spatial structure of flood and ebb currents in the vicinity of an estuarine mouth (Stommel and Farmer, 1952). Chadwick and Largier (1999) have shown that tidal exchange is the dominant exchange mechanism in San Diego Bay. However, the structure of the flood/ebb asymmetry and, thus, the exchange rate, is controlled by details of the estuarine and coastal geometry, within a tidal excursion of the mouth (Signell and Butman, 1992). The details of the circulation in the vicinity of the mouth are determined not only by tides (Stommel and Farmer, 1953), but also river discharge, outflow geometery (Avicola and Huq, 2004) and meteorological forcing (Whitney and Garvine, 2005), which together drive the dispersion of the plume. The dispersion of the plume, in turn, impacts fluid properties in the estuary by modifying the mixture between ocean and estuarine that enter the estuary through tidal and density driven circulation. A specific hypothesis that will guide the investigation of the exchange at the river mouth is the following: H1) Temporal fluctuations in estuarine forcing cause significant deviations in exchange, resulting in inadequate steady-state models for accurate estimation of overall estuarine exchange.

2

While observational and modeling studies (Kranenburg, 1986; MacCready, 1999; Hetland and Geyer, 2004) indicate that steady state theories misrepresent the exchange rate, to date there are only limited measures of estuarine transport that extend beyond a few tidal cycles. One exception is a recent set of estuarine observations by Lerczak et al. (2005), which documented time-dependent exchange at the fortnightly and tidal-monthly time-scales. The series of two-year estuarine Pioneer array deployments proposed here would greatly extend the temporal and geographical scope of estuarine flux measurements while providing statistically meaningful estimates of the exchange flow and its variability at tidal month and seasonal time scales. Furthermore, the five-year plan will characterize the exchange dynamics of four estuaries across a significant range of geometries, stratification and forcing conditions.

2.1.2 Dispersal of Buoyant Plumes Buoyant discharges from rivers or estuaries and the resulting coastal currents are important components of the circulation on most continental shelves, e.g., the Alaskan shelf, the Pacific Northwest, the Gulf of Maine, the Middle Atlantic Bight, the South Atlantic Bight, and the Gulf Coast. The buoyant plumes also transport constituents, such as sediment, marine organisms, nutrients, and chemical pollutants large distances from the river or estuarine source. Therefore, determining the ultimate distribution and fate of the constituents in estuarine outflows depends upon our understanding of the processes controlling the dispersal of buoyant plumes and coastal currents (e.g., Wiseman et al. 1997, Epifanio et al. 1989). The generic picture of buoyant outflow from an estuary is reasonably well established by both observational and modeling studies (Chao and Boicourt 1986, Nof 1988, Kourafalou et al. 1996, Chapman and Lentz 1994, Yankovsky and Chapman 1997, Garvine 1999, to cite but a few). Relatively fresh river or estuarine water entering the coastal ocean forms a buoyant plume that typically turns anticyclonically (to the right in the northern hemisphere) and may form a geostrophic buoyant coastal current that travels large distances along the coast. Likely dispersal mechanisms include tidal forcing in the vicinity of the estuary mouth and wind forcing. However, buoyant discharges may also take the form of a recirculating bulge (Nof and Pichven, 2001; Avicola and Huq, 2004ab, Klinger 1993; Bormans and Garrett, 1989) that limits the down shelf transport in the coastal current. The impact of recirculating outflows on physical and biogeochemical cycles may be significant. First, chemical and biological transformations in the recirculation may significantly modify fluid properties prior to its incorporation into a coastal current and thus impacting the down-shelf transport of fresh water and other constituents. Secondly, the recirculation of estuarine water in the vicinity of the mouth will promote deposition of suspended matter and increase estuarine trapping efficiency. Thirdly, the impact of the shelf circulation processes would likely strip fluid away from the recirculating bulge and potentially provide an important pathway delivering riverine water to the shelf break. Finally, results of global climate models are sensitive to parameterizations of the mixing of rivers into the deep ocean (Lee et al. 2005; Garvine and Whitney, in prep) and this mixing process will depend on details of plume dispersion.

3

Figure 1. Schematic of buoyant plume response to different alongshelf wind forcing. a) Upwelling winds flatten the plume front, causing the plume to thin and widen. b) Moderate downwelling winds steepen the front, causing the plume to thicken and narrow. c) Strong downwelling winds force vertical mixing that widens the plume front, but causes little change in the plume width (from Lentz and Largier, 2004). The overall goal of this proposed study is to provide an understanding of the physics governing the dispersion of buoyant plumes and provide the physical oceanographic context from which exchange of conservative (fresh water, salt, sediment) and non-conservative (nutrients, plankton, carbon, trace metals) and associated variability can be determined. Specific hypotheses are: H1) The dispersal of buoyant plume water over the MAB shelf is dominated by wind forcing. Observations and numerical model studies have shown that wind forcing has a profound influence on the characteristics of buoyant coastal currents from rivers or estuaries because the wind-driven momentum flux is trapped in the relatively thin buoyant plume by the large density gradients separating the plume from the ambient fluid (Chao 1988, Blanton et al. 1989, Munchow and Garvine 1993, Kourafalou et al 1996, Fong et al. 1997, Hickey et al. 1998, Xing and Davies 1999, Rennie et al. 1999, Berdeal et al. 2002}. Upwelling and downwelling favorable winds may result in very different dispersal patterns (e.g. Chao 1988, Blanton et al. 1989, Lentz and Largier 2005) (fig. 1).

4

Upwelling-favorable winds inhibit the formation of a buoyant coastal current and may cause plume water to disperse offshore in the vicinity of the source. When a buoyant coastal current already exists at the onset of upwelling winds, the wind-driven offshore Ekman transport causes the plume to thin, widen, eventually separate from the coast and ultimately disperse offshore (Fong et al. 1997, Hickey et al. 1998, Rennie et al. 1999, Johnson et al. 2001, Sanders and Garvine 2001, Hallock and Marmarino 2002, Johnson et al. 2003, Lentz 2004, Houghton et al. 2004). In contrast, downwelling-favorable winds tend to enhance the formation of a buoyant coastal current, causing it to thicken, narrow, and flow more rapidly alongshelf (Blanton et al. 1989, Munchow and Garvine 1993, Kourafalou et al. 1996, Hickey et al. 1998, Rennie et al. 1999, Johnson et al. 2001, Lentz and Largier 2005). Thus upwelling winds tend to disperse buoyant plume water offshore, while downwelling winds keep the plume water close to the coast and increase its alongshore extent to the south and west in the MAB. These results suggest that magnitude, duration and direction of wind forcing are important factors in the dispersal patterns of buoyant plumes. H2) The dispersal of buoyant plume water over the MAB shelf is sensitive to the timing and characteristics of discharge events from estuaries. A variety of factors with different time scales may influence the discharge of water from estuaries including variations in the river discharge into the estuary, wind forcing, and tides (e.g. Munchow and Garvine 1993, Whitney and Garvine 2004). Hypothesis H1 suggests that buoyant water discharged during upwelling-favorable winds may have a very different dispersal pattern than water discharged during downwelling-favorable winds. Thus, the dispersal of buoyant plume water depends on the factors influencing the timing of the buoyant water discharge from the estuary. Important factors may include the relationship between the seasonality of the wind and river discharge, i.e. what are the wind conditions during spring runoff. The relationship between rainfall and winds in individual storm events may also be important (Geyer et al. 2004). Large estuaries, such as the Chesapeake, may store and release buoyant water in response to wind forcing (Valle-Levinson et al 2001) providing a more direct connection between wind forcing and discharge events. Conditions at the mouth of the estuary that result in release of buoyant water depend on both the estuary response to the wind forcing and the shelf response, which influences conditions at the mouth of the estuary. Consequently the release of buoyant water can be sensitive to the estuary-shelf geometry (Garvine 1985, 1991). These considerations suggest that there may be a wide range of dispersal patterns for different estuaries within the MAB. 2.1.3 Particulate Fluxes from Land to Sea Estuaries are the conduits for particulate matter from continents to the oceans (Milliman and Meade, 1983). The sediment trapping and dispersal processes that occur within estuaries and the adjoining continental shelf determine the fate of that particulate matter and affect the transformations of associated chemicals (Aller, 1998). The interpretation of the stratigraphic record in coastal environments requires an understanding of the processes affecting the supply and dispersal of sediment (Nittrouer, 1999), which involves processes in estuaries, the shallow continental shelf as well as the deep, seaward limits of the continental margin. The East Coast of the US is not presently a major source of sediment to the oceans by global standards, due to the relative maturity of the East Coast morphology and the efficient trapping of sediment within estuaries (Meade, 1972). However there is significant variability in trapping between estuarine

5

systems, and all of these estuaries are potentially capable of releasing large amounts of sediment during extreme events (Meade, 1972; Geyer et al., 2001). Even in estuaries in which these sediment discharge events are rare, they are fundamentally important in controlling the estuarine morphology as well as in regulating the flux of chemicals (both natural and anthropogenic) from terrestrial environments to the ocean. Two hypotheses frame this research effort: H1: The co-occurrence of high river flow and spring tidal conditions produces the dominant sediment export events from large estuarine systems. A principal objective of the sediment-transport component of the proposal is to document the extreme events in which there is substantial sediment export from estuaries. The success of this research effort depends on the long-term deployment of Endurance Moorings at estuary mouths, as the recurrence interval of extreme events may range from annual to decadal or longer, depending on the estuary. River discharge is the key factor affecting sediment supply to the estuary, and high river flow is a necessary ingredient of sediment export. However, Geyer et al. (2001) demonstrated that high river flow is not sufficient—the tidal energy within the estuary also has to be sufficient to prevent sediment from being trapped within the estuary. H2: The spatial scales of sediment deposition within estuaries and the inner continental shelf are set by the spatial scales of frontal structures within the water column. It has long been known that frontal convergence is a major ingredient in formation of the “estuarine turbidity maximum”. Studies on the Amazon shelf (Kineke et al., Geyer et al., 1998) and the Hudson estuary (Geyer et al., 1998) have demonstrated that frontal trapping of sediment can occur in diverse environments and over a wide range of temporal and spatial scales. This proposal takes advantage of the ability of the Pioneer elements of the ORION Coastal Observatory system to resolve frontal structures within estuaries and in the inner shelf region and to document their influence on sediment trapping. 2.1.4 Turbulent Mixing and Subgrid Scale Parameterization Levine and Lueck (1999) have demonstrated the feasibility of obtaining reliable AUV-based dissipation estimates in an estuary. In recent studies, Goodman et al (2005) have been able to close the budgets for the conservation of turbulent kinetic energy and buoyancy, using measurements of turbulence and fine structure taken with an instrumented AUV. In addition, the Reynolds stress and the vertical flux of heat were directly obtained from the correlation of vertical and horizontal velocity, and the correlation of vertical velocity and temperature fluctuations, respectively. The context for this work was a convective coastal front at the entrance to an estuary (Long Island Sound), and stratified flow within an estuary (Narragansett Bay). A specific hypothesis that will guide the studies of turbulent mixing is the following: H1) The character of the turbulent budget closures provides clues to the dominant exchange processes and appropriate sub-grid scale parameterization.

6

For the Orion estuary/shelf exchange studies, the instrumented AUV (SMAST T-REMUS) can provide nearly synoptic horizontal transects, providing information on micro and finescale bio-physical processes. We propose adding a loosely tethered vertical turbulence profiler to our sampling plan. Our work, primarily addressing the nearfield-exchange processes, will aid in understanding the larger scale multi-disciplinary issues. We will work very closely with modelers in quantifying estuary/inner shelf fluxes in hot spots such as tidal mixing fronts, buoyant plumes, and frontal convergences. The data collected would be used to examine various subgrid scale models, i.e. Mellor Yamada, KPP, as well as constant eddy viscosity and diffusivity.

2.2 Biogeochemical Transport and Transformations Freshwater runoff from land constitutes the most important input to seawater for the majority of elements. Terrestrial weathering processes strongly affect the chemical evolution of seawater as well as climate, and radiogenic isotope systems (e.g., Rb-Sr, Sm-Nd, Lu-Hf, Re-Os, U-Th-Pb) can be used to quantitatively constrain such weathering processes based on isotopic records of marine sediments. In addition, terrestrial systems supply a significant source of organic carbon to estuarine systems. While some studies have suggested estuaries as net heterotrophic, other recent studies suggest estuaries are reaction zones, where given a highly productive margin, can be significantly autotrophic. Carbon may also be added to estuaries through groundwater inputs, a process that can be traced using Ra isotopes. Riverine transport of elements to the ocean is modified to various degrees in estuarine mixing zones. Elements can either pass through estuaries without modification (conservative), or experience removal or addition (non-conservative) depending on their chemical behavior in water and during early diagenesis of estuarine sediments. Land-to-sea transport of dissolved (and particulate) species therefore requires an in-depth understanding of processes in estuarine mixing zones. Without such knowledge marine isotope records and fluxes of carbon from land to sea cannot be understood.

2.2.1 Temporal Constraints on Dispersion using Radium Isotopes Tracking the processes that occur within estuaries and their water masses once they enter the shelf region is not a straightforward process. Flux measurements are valuable, but waterborne tracers provide insights about transport rates and pathways that cannot be duplicated by eulerian measurements. Naturally occurring radium isotopes (226Ra–t1/2 = 1600 years, 228Ra–t1/2 = 5.75 years, 224Ra–t1/2 = 3.66 days, and 223Ra–t1/2 = 11.4 days) have been used effectively to quantify lateral mixing processes between shelf waters and the open ocean (Moore et al., 1980; Key et al., 1985; Moore et al., 1995). Through the decay of thorium isotopes, radium isotopes are continually input to coastal waters, including rivers and estuaries, from sediments by both advective (i.e. submarine groundwater discharge) and diffusive processes (Moore, 1996; Krest et al., 1999; Charette et al., 2001). Hence, the large-scale input of radium isotopes along the coastline is akin to a purposeful tracer release, with the short-lived radium isotopes providing the rate of dispersion based on their decay as they mix away from the source.

7

Figure 2. Distance averaged radium-224 activities from two transects extending 15 km into Mass. Bay from the mouth of Boston Harbor. Data was collected during three cruises between summer 1999 and summer 2000. The average horizontal eddy diffusion coefficient (Kh) is calculated from the 224Ra distribution assuming decay and mixing are the only removal processes. An example of the utility of Ra isotopes for quantifying coastal mixing rates is shown in Figure 2. During a study of contaminant transport derived from Boston Harbor, Charette and co-workers (unpub. data) occupied two shore-perpendicular transects during three different time periods in 1999-2000. One of the major project goals was to test the sensitivity of the radium approach during periods of both high (spring) and low (summer) runoff. As expected, the 224Ra distribution reflected greatly increased cross-bay mixing during the high runoff period (spring) from Boston Harbor. The calculated horizontal eddy diffusivity coefficient of 460 m2 s-1 for Spring 2000 was ~4-8 times higher than estimates from the two summer cruises (60-120 m2 s-1).

The goal of this sub-project is to use radium isotopes as conservative tracers of water residence time within estuaries and at shelf-estuary interfaces. Such measurements would play a central role in the proposed observatory, as the internal “clocks” that they possess would provide observatory users the ability to convert their measurements of a given chemical or water mass property into actual fluxes. We can distil our goals into two key questions:

1. What are the time scales for buoyant plume mixing and dispersion on the continental shelf? How do they vary with season and during episodic events such as floods?

2. How do these mixing processes influence the fate of estuarine-derived reactive chemicals

(e.g. carbon and nitrogen) and suspended sediment? We are proposing a blend of time-series in situ measurements and shipboard sampling to fill in the gaps in coverage by the ORION array. The shipboard sampling would be conducted during different seasons (e.g. wet vs. dry) and in response to episodic events. The logistical details of this objective are described in detail below.

There are several important reasons that justify the proposed infrastructure and real-time capability for a radium component to this coastal observatory. The first justification relates to the driving forces behind land-ocean material fluxes. Traditional shipboard sampling programs often miss episodic events, which in some cases may be responsible for a significant portion of the annual material flux from estuaries to shelf waters. In addition, the dynamic range of

8

seasonal/interannual (e.g. wet season/dry season) material fluxes can be quite large and at present are poorly understood for systems proposed herein. The second justification relates specifically to radium isotopes. Because of their short half-life, 224Ra and 223Ra ideally should be analyzed within one to two weeks of sample collection. Therefore, it is not adequate to simply collect and store samples on mooring deployments of longer than several weeks–they must be analyzed in real time. Their short-half life also means that any non-steady-state behavior in their input at the coast must be accounted for in order to accurately quantify water mass mixing and dispersion rates. The delayed coincidence counters (RaDeCC) developed by Moore and Arnold (1996) are the central player in our proposed observatory-based approach. The basic premise behind the RaDeCC system is (1) preconcentration of Ra isotopes on MnO2-coated acrylic fiber, (2) circulation of He through the fiber column which (3) sweeps the radon isotopes (decay products of Ra) into (4) a scintillation cell where the Rn decay products are detected by a PMT tube. Finally, a series of electronic “gates” takes advantage of the fact that the Rn decay products have widely different half-lives. Though yet to be adapted for in situ analysis, RaDeCC’s low power requirement and straightforward electronics and software make it an ideal candidate for such a modification.

2.2.2. Elemental Fluxes from Land to Sea

A detailed knowledge of estuarine processing is particularly important for elements whose budgets have been significantly modified by industrial, agricultural and urban activities. The fraction of anthropogenically released elements/molecules reaching the coastal ocean critically depends on estuarine processes. As physical and chemical conditions in estuaries vary significantly on time scales from less than one hour to events with recurrence periods of many years (e.g., floods, droughts), land-to-sea material transfer requires time-series measurements. Ideally, sampling is done on demand, triggered remotely based on continuous sensor measurements of critical physical and chemical conditions. The dynamic nature of estuarine processing therefore requires automated samplers with remote triggering capabilities that are integrated with other (moored) sensing equipment.

The need for time-series sampling of estuarine mixing zones is exemplified below using new data for dissolved rhenium (Walker & Peucker-Ehrenbrink, 2004, 2005). Rhenium is characterized by a long marine residence time (750 kyr; Colodner et al., 1993) and conservative behavior in seawater (Anbar et al., 1992; Colodner et al., 1993, 1995). Based on results from prior research, Re should mix conservatively across the salinity gradient (Colodner, 1991) with concentrations in uncontaminated rivers lower (~2 pM) than those in seawater (40 pM). Elevated Re concentrations measured in several eastern European rivers have been attributed to anthropogenic contamination (coal burning; Colodner et al., 1995). The natural Re cycle is of significance for the global carbon cycle, because reducing marine sediments are the main sink of marine Re. Despite the fact that such depositional environments account for only a few percent of the marine depositional area, more than 50% of the depositional flux of Re in the oceans is associated with reducing sediments. Based on this evidence, Colodner et al. (1993) hypothesize that nearly 50% of the riverine Re flux is derived from weathering of old sedimentary organic carbon. Jaffe et al. (2001) have demonstrated that Re loss from reducing sedimentary rocks occurs rapidly and nearly quantitatively during weathering of such rocks.

9

We therefore hypothesize that dissolved riverine Re concentrations are positively correlated with indicators of release of old, sedimentary organic carbon (e.g., Raymond & Bauer, 2001a,b). Such a correlation has been shown for marine sedimentary rocks (Ravizza & Esser, 1993). However, the nature of this link is unknown, as we do not know the chemical speciation of Re in sedimentary rocks. The hypothesis that the surficial Re and sedimentary organic carbon cycles are intimately tied can only be tested if measurements of inorganic compounds are combined with those of organic compounds. Physical and biological parameters such as salinity, particulate loading, biological productivity, and dissolved oxygen content are crucial for interpreting data for inorganic and organic species in highly dynamic estuarine environments. An integrated science-driven, technology-supported program focusing on the land-to-sea transport of organic and inorganic species is therefore of critical importance for understanding this important transport.

Rhenium data from the salinity gradients in the Amazon, Mississippi and Fly River Deltas as well as the Hudson River estuary are shown in Figure 3. While the Hudson data provide evidence for non-conservative behavior of Re in the salinity gradient, data for the Mississippi River indicate significant contamination of unknown origin. In order to resolve whether these profiles represent steady-state or transient features, time series data are needed.

Figure 3. Rhenium vs. salinity for different estuaries.

For instance, if the high riverine Re concentrations detected in the Mississippi River reflect steady state, the riverine Re input from the Mississippi River alone would lead to a near doubling of the global annual flux of Re to seawater. It is therefore possible that the present-day riverine Re input to the oceans is dominated by anthropogenic processes and no longer useful to infer transport of old sedimentary organic carbon to the coastal ocean. As 187Re decays to 187Os, ~41.6 Gyr half-life), anthropogenically enhanced input of Re to the ocean may also affect the marine osmium isotope system. The marine Os isotope record provides unique information on

10

globally integrated silicate and organic carbon weathering rates as it responds to changes on time scales of several thousand years (Pegram et al., 1992; for recent review see Peucker-Ehrenbrink & Ravizza, 2000) rather than millions of years as in the case of the marine strontium isotope system.

Time-series data are of critical important for improving our understanding of factors influencing land-to-sea transport of elements that are critical for the reconstruction of the chemical evolution of seawater, its response to environmental change on land as well as the impact of anthropogenic contamination on the coastal ocean.

2.2.3 Carbon Fluxes from Land to Sea Rivers, estuaries and the coastal ocean receive large subsidies of terrestrial organic carbon and inorganic nutrients. These large subsidies make coastal systems some of the most productive systems on the globe. They are also some of the most dynamic and most affected by environmental change. Historically, the riverine input of carbon to the oceans has been viewed as a small yet significant flux that is modeled to balance pre-anthropogenic net autotrophy on land and CO2 gas exchange in the oceans (Sarmiento and Gruber 2002). Recently authors have argued that riverine carbon balances are larger than previously assumed and important components of regional carbon budgets (Frankignoulle et al. 1998, Cole and Caraco 2001, Richey 2004). Furthermore, the transport of riverine carbon and nutrients to the ocean are no longer thought to be conservative but subject to large modifications within coastal systems (Borges and Frankignoulle 1999, Bauer et al. 2001, Raymond and Bauer 2001a, Cai 2003; Gardner et al, 2005). Coastal systems are now being viewed as significant filters that can drastically alter the amount, timing and form of biogeochemically important constituents to the open ocean. Understanding how these filters work and respond to anthropogenic and climate forcing has been targeted as a key area of future ocean research (Cloern 2001). The processes of primary production and organic matter remineralization (i.e., Net Ecosystem Production; NEP) are important to CO2 concentrations in coastal waters. The linkage between NEP and CO2 is due to the phase-state transition of carbon during primary production and organic matter respiration. Primary producers convert CO2 to organic matter, while organic matter respiration liberates CO2. Both processes result in a change in the partial pressure of CO2. It is important to emphasize that for a given site CO2 super-saturation or under-saturation is only an indication if the system is net autotrophic or heterotrophic. For instance, the coastal ocean may be a source for atmospheric CO2 through air-sea exchange of CO2 transported into the coast by riverine or open oceanic input, and still be autotrophic, and therefore biologically consuming CO2.

Furthermore, because inorganic nutrients are also utilized and remineralized during primary production and organic matter oxidation, studies designed to estimate NEP provide information on how fast a system processes, stores and exports important nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus. The link between nutrients and NEP is particularly important when considering the cycling of these constituents in the open ocean. For instance, if the coastal zone is heterotrophic it will export remineralized nutrients to the open ocean fueling production and drawing down CO2 concentrations in open ocean surface waters, providing a potential partial pressure difference across the air-sea interface.

11

The highly dynamic nature of coastal systems causes large temporal and spatial variability in biogeochemical variables, which often obscure processes. The ORION Coastal Observatory network provides a means of overcoming the sampling challenges so as to be able to determine the important processes affecting the processing and export of carbon and nutrients. Three major sources of variability exist for estuaries in the Mid-Atlantic Bight: freshwater flow (flux and concentrations); tides; and winds. We propose to monitor freshwater endmembers where rainfall on the watershed affect river flow, estuaries where tides mix freshwater and seawater, and river mouths where winds affect plume dynamics and residence times.

Our major objectives are: 1. Develop an understanding of the sources, transformations, and sinks of carbon at the land-ocean interface (estuaries, river plumes, coastal ocean). We will utilize carbon isotopes, gas exchange processes, optical properties, and tracers of organic carbon to quantify processes and examine the qualitative transformations of organic carbon in estuaries. Major processes include watershed influences, wetland inputs, phototransformations, benthic exchange, and physical mixing. Our hypothesis is that riverine carbon is significantly altered quantitatively and qualititatively within estuaries and that carbon that is exported onto the shelf is dependent on estuarine processes.

2. Develop an understanding of the temporal (high discharge, seasonal vegetation) as well as spatial (wind-driven river plume, “sheet” flow, nepheloid layer) variations and fluxes of carbon. Our hypothesis is that organic carbon fluxes are dependent on physical controls of water masses, biological productivity, and microbial degradation.

2.3 Retention and Dispersal of Organisms Many species of benthic invertebrates living in estuaries spend part of their life cycle dispersing as planktonic larvae. These include ecologically and economically important species of mollusks such as the soft-shell clam, hard-shell clam, and common oyster, and crustaceans such as the blue crab. Their larvae remain planktonic for weeks, and during that time may exit the estuary and disperse to neighboring or remote habitats. The proportion of larvae that exit an estuary, and their trajectories after leaving the estuary mouth depend largely on their interactions with estuarine and coastal hydrodynamics. The capability of larvae to remain planktonic for extended periods raises several general questions about dispersal, recruitment and connectivity in estuarine populations: 1. How do larval behavior and hydrodynamic processes affect larval fluxes out of and into an

estuary? 2. What combinations of topography and coastal hydrodynamics facilitate larval dispersal

between discrete estuaries? What combinations constitute barriers? 3. What proportion of larvae entering (or recruiting in) an estuary were spawned there? Where

did the remaining larvae come from?

12

In the past 10 years, larval ecologists and biological oceanographers have made substantial progress in understanding transport of larval crustaceans in estuaries. Larvae of the blue crab are released during nocturnal high tides in the late summer, and have been tracked as they disperse out of estuaries and onto the continental shelf (reviewed in Epifanio and Garvine 2001). These larvae disperse in patches that remain discrete for days (Natunewicz and Epifanio 2001). The larvae are associated with the buoyant estuarine plume when they exit the estuary (Roman and Boicourt 1999) and their transport appears to be strongly affected by wind-driven currents and riverine discharge events. However, crab larvae have relatively strong swimming capabilities, and their vertical position in the water column also affects their dispersal (Dibacco et al. 2001, Forward et al. 2003). Larvae of mollusks have received less attention. Their swimming speeds are relatively low and they typically are treated as passive particles. However, recent laboratory studies have demonstrated swimming responses to turbulence in gastropod larvae (Fuchs et al. 2004), and field observations show that bivalve larvae disperse differently than passive tracers (Arnold et al 2005). An important attribute of mollusk larvae is their ability to develop carbonate shell material in their natal habitat and retain it during dispersal and recruitment. This biogenic carbonate contains an elemental and isotopic signature of the natal location, and is useful as a dispersal tag, making these species ideal for studies of population connectivity (Zacherl et al. 2003, Becker et al 2005). Nitrogen isotopes may be useful for distinguishing between larvae that have remained in the estuary and those that have dispersed and fed in the open ocean (Hansson et al. 1997). Aspects of each of these questions can be addressed with an observatory approach concentrating on monitoring and collection of larvae at the mouth of an estuary with additional observations extending into the estuary and out over the shelf. The larval investigations will be conducted in tight coordination with studies physical transport and exchange (section 2.1). Initial hydrodynamic studies and biological sampling will be used to select locations at the estuary mouth where specific hypotheses can be tested about larval interactions with flow. Shipboard surveys of larvae will be conducted before placement of the observatory to characterize the shape, evolution and typical advection paths of larval patches. Collection of specimens is essential, in order to verify species identity, evaluate larval stage (e.g., newly-spawned versus competent to settle), and measure elemental composition of larval shell. However, such collections require frequent servicing of instruments, and the sample processing is time consuming. Therefore, development of a supplemental optical monitoring capability (the Video Plankton Recorder (VPR) is included as an objective. Details of the sampling and observation plan are in the ‘Approach and Observing Requirements’ section.

Larval studies will be coordinated with two different benthic studies that are not described here. One (specific to mollusks) is a characterization of the elemental composition of shells of larvae spawned in a target estuary and other estuaries in the region within the species’ dispersal ambit. This study would be an extension of a current NSF-funded project on population connectivity of soft-shell clams (PIs Mullineaux, Lerczak et al.) The second is an examination of newly-settled larvae to determine temporal patterns in recruitment and natal source of recruits. These benthic investigations are essential to understand the consequences of larval processes for population dynamics and connectivity, but they are not suited to an observatory approach. Finally,

13

theoretical studies will be used to integrate biological and physical measurements quantitatively and to make predictions about benthic population responses to perturbations such as storm events and climate change.

A variety of ecologically important or economically valued fish and invertebrate species are candidates for dispersal and connectivity studies. One example is the soft-shell clam, Mya arenaria. Its range encompasses all the study estuaries in this proposal (Table 1), it spawns predictably when water temperatures warm to 10°C, adult populations are not found outside estuaries, and the initial larval shell is retained during dispersal and recruitment. Our proposed study focuses in Mya, but other species (Table 1) could easily be substituted for some of the questions in particular regions (Fish aren’t listed only because we don’t know much about them). Studies of larval dispersal and population connectivity are integral to an understanding of the structure and dynamics of coastal benthic populations. Results are directly applicable to management of estuarine fisheries. Estimates of population exchange will lead to improved design of reserve networks as well as better understanding of perturbations (anthropogenic or natural) in the maintenance of marine resources and biodiversity.

3. Approach and Observing Requirements Our research approach involves both longterm measurements at four estuaries (Connecticut River, Hudson River, Delaware River and Chesapeake Bay) and numerical modeling. For the purpose of characterizing the physics of exchange, spatially and temporally well-resolved measurements of currents, temperature and salinity are required. This will be accomplished using two complementary sampling strategies: moored platforms and AUV surveys, during two-year pioneer studies at each of the estuaries. A more limited combination of fixed instrumentation and rapid surveys was very effective in gaining a better understanding of the Chesapeake Bay buoyant coastal current and the associated dispersal mechanisms (Rennie et al 1999, Lentz et al 2003, Lentz 2004, Lentz and Largier 2005).

Table 1: Potential target invertebrate species for estuarine observatory studies. All species are suited to questions of larval dispersal; the mollusks are also suited to studies of population connectivity. Most species live in all 4 estuaries mentioned in this proposal. The mussel inhabits the exposed coast and is suited to questions of bay/shelf exchange. Habitats and ranges are from Gosner (1978). Species Main Habitat Core Range

Soft-shelled clam Mya arenaria Estuary Subatctic to Cape Hatteras Hard-shelled clam Mercenaria mercenaria Estuary Cape Cod to Gulf of Mexico Common oyster Crassostrea virginica Estuary Cape Cod to Gulf of Mexico Blue mussel Mytilus edulis Estuary, Shelf Circumpolar Mud snail Nassarius obsoletus Estuary Cape Cod to Gulf of Mexico Slipper shell Crepidula fornicata Estuary, Coast Mass. Bay to Gulf of Mexico Blue crab Callinectes sapidus Estuary Cape Cod to Uruguay

14

3.1 Moorings Three mooring configurations are proposed: 1) Endurance moorings at the estuary mouths, with a full complement of physical, biological and chemical sampling systems; 2) “Big” Pioneer moorings, also including a full complement of physical, biological and chemical sampling systems, but with more modest power requirements than the Endurance moorings; and 3) “small” Pioneer moorings with a limited set of physical, optical and acoustic sensors 3.1.1 Endurance Moorings The Endurance moorings would be permanently deployed at the mouths of the 4 major estuaries. They would have high bandwidth communications capabilities and 100-500 watts of power, for driving instruments and vertically profiling winches. A bottom-mounted ADCP and a bottom-mounted, winch-profiling CTD with additional bio-optical sensors would be operated continuously. Meteorological and wave measurements would also be continuously measured from the surface buoy. During intensive sampling periods, additional sampling systems and sensor packages (as described in Section 3.5) would be installed on the Endurance moorings. These sampling systems will have to have vertical profiling capability, which requires a substantial profiling winch, as developed by Scott Gallager and colleagues for the video plankton recorder. The endurance moorings would be outfitted with in situ water samplers on their profiling system. These samplers would provide user-triggered or event-triggered samples for chemical, biological, and suspended sediment studies (see Section 3.4 for specific descriptions). The Endurance moorings would all have a standard suite of sensors, but additional sensors would be incorporated for the two-year intensive sampling intervals. 3.1.2 “Big” Pioneer Moorings The “big” moorings would be placed strategically along the estuarine axis, mouth and inner shelf domains. They would be similar to the Endurance moorings in design, but they would provide significantly less power, so as to reduce their cost and complexity. The power reductions would be accomplished by adjusting the duty-cycles of power-intensive instruments appropriately, or increasing the turnaround frequency to refresh battery packs. 3.1.3 “Small” Pioneer Moorings The “small” moorings would fill in spatial resolution to document the spatial structure in the estuarine and inner-shelf domains. These “moorings” would not have any permanent surface expression, so as to reduce conflicts with shipping and increase reliability. They would consist of a bottom-mounted, upward-looking ADCP for current measurements, and a winch-profiled CTD (Doherty et al., 2001), with additional bio-optical and chemical sensors. The profiler would provide 2-way telemetry via cell-phone link when it reaches the water surface. Under development at WHOI is an inductive modem to provide data connectivity to bottom-mounted instruments. Thus the data from the bottom-mounted ADCP will also be transmitted via the profiling winch. Vessel avoidance systems (based on ambient noise detection) for the winched profiler is also under development.

15

All of the moorings will be telemetered and networked to the investigators using cell-phone (either local network or Irridium, depending on distance offshore). Frequency of sampling will be remotely controllable, and event-triggered sampling can be accomplished either with pre-set thresholds or by a remote operator. The water samplers will be event triggered, as described below. The standard turnaround cycle for all of the moorings would be three months, but more frequent servicing (1 month or less) would be performed for servicing water samplers during intensive study periods, or for sensor systems that are very susceptible to fouling.

Table 2: Mooring Configurations and Locations

Pioneer Moorings Endurance Moorings “Big” “Small”

Power Requirement 100-500 watts 20 watts 10 watts Service Interval 1-3 mo. 1-3 mo. 3 mo. Surface Expression Met Buoy Met Buoy none Telemetry 2-way 2-way 2-way

Estuarine Axis 4 3 Mouth 1 per estuary 2 2 Shelf- near-field

4 8

Location

Shelf- far-field 4 6 Total 4 14 20

The array of fixed instrumentation will consist of the following elements (Fig.4): 1) Estuarine axis array. An array of 4-8 moorings along the axis of the estuary will be deployed to quantify the variation in the estuarine structure (stratification, tidal and residual velocity, intrusion length, suspended sediment distribution, and associated bio-optical properties). 2) Estuarine mouth array. An array of 4-6 moorings deployed across the estuarine mouth. Based on the study of Lerczak and Geyer (2005), at least 4 moorings across the channel are necessary for resolving the dominant scales of variability of the fluxes. The Endurance Mooring at the estuarine mouth will be one of the elements of the mouth array. In addition it will collect meteorological data, will provide power for charging the AUVs. After the completion of the two-year Pioneer Array deployment, the Endurance Mooring will document long-term variability of the fluxes. 3) Near-field array. An array of 10-15 moorings will be deployed within one to two tidal excursions (10-15 km) from the mouth. This is a critical, though poorly understood region, where tidal asymmetries may be important for driving exchange and substantial water property transformations occur.

16

Figure 4. Schematic of proposed sampling strategy using Chesapeake Bay as an example. Note AUV survey tracks will be varied in real time according to the structure of the buoyant plume. 4) Far-field array. An array of 8-10 moorings will be deployed to span the region of freshwater influence around the source of the estuary and alongshore (equatorward) to determine the characteristics of the buoyant coastal current including the propagation speed, plume characteristics and structure near the nose of the plume (e.g. Rennie et al. 1999 and Lentz et al. 2003). The alongshelf component of the far-field array will tie into existing Endurance Lines (Fig. 4).

3.2 AUVs To complement the moored array we propose deployment of a fleet of 7 AUVs. The primary objective of the AUV surveys will be to continually map out the buoyant plume structure over an extended period of time (months). The AUVs will be instrumented with current profilers, CTDs, fluorometers, and optical backscatter sensors. One of the AUVs will also be equipped with

17

microstructure turbulence sensors (Goodman et al., 2005), to study turbulent processes on the inner shelf and estuarine environments. Existing AUVs (such as the REMUS) have ranges of about 80-90 km at a speed of about 2-3 knots, so a transect takes 8-11 hours. New AUVs are being developed with endurance of 100 hours and 400 km (von Alt, pers. comm.) Longer endurance has an obvious benefit for temporal and spatial sampling, as well as greatly improving deployment efficiency. The AUV surveys will include radial lines extending outward from the estuary mouth to determine the evolving structure and dispersal of the plume (Fig. 3). There will also be zig-zag patterns along the coast to map out the structure of the order 5 km wide buoyant coastal current. AUVs are the best tool for the survey work for several reasons. First, ship-based surveys are not ideal for thin buoyant plumes, because even small coastal vessel generate wakes that mix deep enough to entrain deeper water into the plume contaminating the observations. Additionally, long-term continual survey work from a small ship over a wide range of conditions is not feasible or cost effective. AUVs are more suitable than Gliders for this particular effort because, buoyant plume flows tend to be much faster than Glider velocities. Also Gliders need to go up and down to survey, whereas AUVs are more flexible, and can for example make rapid surveys just below the surface in a thin plume. Finally, current profile measurements which are more feasible from an AUV are essential for calculating buoyancy fluxes.

3.3 Shipboard Surveys Shipboard hydrographic and ADCP surveys will be undertaken during a period of site reconnaissance at the beginning of the pioneer study of each estuary and during periodic mooring maintenance missions. These surveys will include tidal cycle surveys of the estuarine mouth in order to resolve the spatial and temporal scales of variability with finer resolution than the mooring arrays will allow. During the reconnaissance period, these shipboard surveys will be used to determine the optimal placement for the moored assets. Shipboard sampling of plankton will be initiated directly after spawning of a target benthic species (e.g., soft-shell clam) to establish typical dispersal pathways within each estuary. Shipboard surveys will also be triggered by the real-time monitoring arrays within the estuaries and inner shelf. Given the complexity of coastal and estuarine processes caused by the high spatial and temporal variability within the system, a real-time, in situ survey system (Integrated Coastal Observation System; ICOS) designed specifically for optical measurements and chemical sampling will be employed. This system utilizes an undulating vehicle, the ECOShuttle, designed and constructed for operating in 3-50 m depths and outfitted with a Chlorophyll fluorometer, CDOM fluorometer, and a hydrocarbon fluorometer as well as a CTD and oxygen and backscatter sensors. In addition to these sensors, a submersible pump aboard the shuttle continuously supplies seawater to the ship’s laboratory where in-line absorbance (AC-9), laser-induced (spectral and time resolution) fluorescence total organic carbon/total nitrogen (Shimadzu) and particle size (LISST-100) measurements. Discrete samples are routinely taken for full excitation-emission matrix fluorescence spectroscopy (EEMs), spectral absorbance, total suspended matter, particulate organic carbon and nitrogen, dissolved organic carbon (DOC), DO13C, and total extractable hydrocarbons (especially polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon) analyses.

18

3.4 Moored Water Sampling

In situ water sampling is required for the chemical, biological and sediment transport studies. The McLane RAS-500 (McLane Research Laboratories) water sampler will be modified and enhanced for two configurations, one which provides Radium and larval samples, and the other for trace metal and carbon sampling.

3.4.1 Radium/Larval Sampler

The McLane sampler will be configured to provide larval samples as well as samples for Radium analysis. The heart of such a system would be a rotary valve and pumping system (i.e. McLane Research WTS), where water would be pumped first through a 63-micron mesh net then through a column of Mn-impregnated fiber. The mesh net concentrates the larvae while the Mn-fiber quantitatively extracts Ra from the seawater. The sampler can collect and store up to 24 of these sample pairs. It is possible, with some minor modifications, that the Ra samples could be coupled to a delayed coincidence counting system installed on the mooring. This modification would allow for the analysis of shortlived radium isotopes in near real time. Otherwise, the McLane 24-port manifold would provide 8-week coverage at a sampling frequency of once every two days. The timing and frequency of sampling are not fixed. For instance, sampling for larvae will occur only during the period between spawning and settlement, when the target species is in the water column (e.g., June to August for Mya arenaria). High-frequency sampling (hourly) over a period of days will be needed at the estuary mouth to document larval behavioral responses to tidally varying flows. High frequency sampling also will be used in response to storm events to document fluxes during high outflow periods. Daily or bi-daily sampling in the estuary and over the shelf will be adequate for background monitoring of larval fluxes and connectivity. Samplers will be positioned on the 6 profiling moorings crossing the estuary mouth, and on an additional 6 moorings located on lines radiating out over the shelf (Fig. 3). The vertical position of the samplers will be set based on the expected position of the buoyant estuarine plume and on expected vertical positions of larvae.

3.4.2 Trace Metal / Carbon Sampler

The sampling for trace metals and carbon species will also utilize a modified McLane water sampler, but it must be configured differently from the Ra/Larvae sampler. The sampler needs to be reconfigured to provide trace-metal clean and organic-carbon clean sampling and filtration of estuarine waters over estuarine mixing cycles at high and low freshwater-flow conditions. Modifications will focus on reducing the effects of fouling and replacing surface filters with high-volume cartridge filters. The system will be modified such that water samples are suitable for triple carbon isotope measurements (Raymond & Bauer, 2001). Power requirements for moored deployment will be reviewed and, if necessary, adjusted.

Time-series sampling will be triggered by changes in physical or chemical conditions within the estuarine mixing zone. Triggering will be pre-programmed based on thresholds of environmental variables or can be remotely triggered by one of the investigators. Thus, the

19

system needs to be integrated with other, moored, sensors (e.g., CTD, turbidity, dissolved O2, chlorophyll) in order to link variations in trace metal chemistry to physical and chemical parameters that may help to elucidate processes modifying dissolved element concentrations. Multiple (at least three) automated samplers moored in different locations within an estuary would afford to sample the salinity gradient simultaneously over the full salinity range.

3.4.3 Video Plankton Recorder A single VPR on a profiling mooring will be used to monitor larval abundances and vertical positions at the estuary mouth. High-resolution images (3.2 Mbytes) may be taken frequently (30 sec-1) for long durations (9000 hours). However, the VPR is in a developmental stage for larval studies, and efforts are underway to refine the image analysis so it provides species-level information. Instrument servicing will be required to eliminate fouling of the lens.

3.4.4 In Situ Mass Spectrometer We propose to estimate Net Ecosystem Production (NEP), Gross Primary Production (GPP) and TR using gas ratios (O2, N2, Ar) measured accurately with a mass spectrometer. The ratios of O2, N2, and Ar allow us to separate biological vs. physical (e.g., air-sea exchange) controls on O2 in order to determine the relationships between biologically mediated fluxes of oxygen and carbon cycling (Keeling, 1993). These measurements however demand high precision that is not available with current probes. Part of the proposed work will be working on redesigning current quadripole mass specs for buoy and AUV deployment to understand carbon and O2 dynamics in coastal areas. Coupled with these measurements will be adapting new Shimadzu units to make multiple standardized measurements of DIC and DOC on buoys.

3.4.5 CDOM Fluorometer Buoys along the axis of the estuaries will be equipped to monitor chromophoric dissolved organic matter (CDOM) with high temporal resolution using CDOM fluorometers. Relationships exist between CDOM and DOC so that the CDOM fluorometer can be calibrated with discrete samples. Measurements will extend to the freshwater end-members to define the source conditions.

20

Table 3. Summary of Equipment Requirements

number sampling

interval power

require-ments

Endurance mooring

(4)

“big” mooring

(10)

“small” mooring

(20)

AUV (7)

ship-

board

ADCP 42 10 min. 1-2 watt 20 7 1

Profiling CTD1

35 1 hour (or event)

50 watts max

3 watts ave.

4 10 20 1

CTD1 7 10 Hz 1 7

water sampler (Ra / larvae)

12 event- triggered

20 watts intermittent

2 10

water sampler (metals / C)

12 event- triggered

20 watts intermittent

2 10

videoplankton recorder

1 1 Hz 50 watts 1

in situ mass spectrometer

4 15 min 15 watts

1 3

CDOM Fluorometer

42 1 Hz 0.1 watts 4 10 20 7 1

Multi-λ Absorption

10 1 Hz 1 watt 1 3 4 2

Multi-λ Fluorescence

7 1 Hz 1 watt 1 1 4 1

Nitrate Sensor 42 1 Hz 6.5 watts 4 10 20 7 1

bulk meteorology

14 1 Hz 2 watts 4 10

Air-seaturbulentfluxes

5 10 Hz 5 watts 1 4

Turbulent CO2 flux

5 10 Hz 4 watts 1 4

21

3.5 Remote sensing 3.5.1 Radar Current and Wave Measurements Remote surface current and wave measurements will be obtained by CODAR (or equivalent) stations set along the coast. Currently a multi-nested grid array of CODAR units is operating in the MAB region. The Endurance array would consist of an array of 5 MHz long-range codar units—similar to the array currently in place and operated collectively by Rutgers, the University of Connecticut and Woods Hole. The Pioneer array would involve 3- 25 Mhz units that would be operated at each of the four outflow regions for 2year periods. 3.52 Satellite Data High-resolution satellite imagery will used in a near-real time for guiding AUV and shipboard surveys. Existing infrastructure in the MAB include Rutgers University’s X-band and L-band satellite receivers. The L-Band system provides real-time access to the full-resolution direct-broadcast raw data streams from the AVHRR sensors on four NOAA satellites, the SeaWiFS ocean color sensor, and ocean color sensors on China’s FY1-C and FY1-D. The X-Band system acquires data from the new generation of higher resolution (both spectral and spatial) ocean color satellites. New satellites with X-Band direct-broadcasting capabilities include the U.S. MODIS (Terra and Aqua), India’s Oceansat, China’s HY1, and Japan’s planned ADEOS-II. Higher spectral resolution enables users to better identify phytoplankton, CDOM and suspended sediment and higher spatial resolution allows one to better resolve sharp nearshore fronts.

4. Timeline for Study The overall program would involve all four of the major estuaries of the mid-Atlantic Bight, including Chesapeake Bay, Delaware Bay, the Hudson River outflow, and the Connecticut River outflow. We envision an intensive, two-year investigation of each of the estuaries, with essentially all of the Pioneer Array elements deployed in that domain over that period. The four Endurance moorings, located at the mouths of the estuaries, would be maintained through the period of this study and indefinitely into the future. Our budgets describe a 5-year plan that would address two out of the four estuarine outflow regimes. A portion of the first year would provide initial site assessment and development of instrument systems and infrastructure. The next two years would be deployment years in the first estuary, and the final two years would cover the second deployment. The order in which the different sites are addressed could be determined based on other factors, such as readiness of ORION components and synergy with other research activities. We recognize that there are many experts on these environments that were not included in this proposal, for reasons of limited time and opportunity, but who would be invaluable contributors to individual field efforts or to the overall program. We expect that a broader coalition of researchers would naturally evolve as this program actually comes to life.

22

5. Justification for Infrastructure The Coastal Observatory provides an opportunity for sustained monitoring and detection of events that are impossible with traditional shipboard or mooring-based investigations. The investment in the relocatable infrastructure of the Pioneer Array also provides unprecedented spatial/temporal coverage of the complex phenomena of the coastal environment. The physics of estuarine exchange and plume outflows are poorly understood, mainly because of the sampling limitations of conventional oceanographic methods. The Observatory elements described here provide an unprecedented opportunity to address these complex problems. For larval studies, the power provided is essential for both pump sampling and VPR operation. Real-time data transmission is not necessary, except to verify that instruments are operational (e.g., to detect malfunction in pumps or fouling of VPR optics). Traditional shipboard sampling programs often miss episodic events, which in some cases may be responsible for a significant portion of the annual material flux from estuaries to shelf waters. In addition, the dynamic range of seasonal/interannual (e.g. wet season/dry season) material fluxes can be quite large and at present are poorly understood for systems proposed herein. The extended duration of the sampling associated with the Observatory provides the temporal “aperture” of sampling required to meaningfully quantify the fluxes of biogeochemically important material from land to sea.

6. Project Management The expertise of project PIs spans all of the sub-disciplines necessary to carry out the proposed research. Therefore, project oversight would be formally conducted by a Scientific Management Committee (SMC) headed by Rocky Geyer and comprised of all the PIs on the project. The panel will formally meet once a year with the primary objective of discussing the progress of the hypothesis testing outlined in the proposal and the effectiveness of the design of the various components of the observing system in achieving the proposed goals. In addition we anticipate that sub-sets of the SMC will meet more frequently to discuss both technical and scientific issues that arise over the course of the program. The proximity of the institutions to one another and the availability of efficient mass transit will facilitate such meetings. In addition PI's will work closely with the ORION engineering group in the selection, calibration, deployment and recovery of observatory infrastructure. We envision the ORION engineering group to produce monthly data reports that will be reviewed by parts of the SMC to insure data quality and consistency. The moorings and AUV’s will be overseen by Geyer, Lentz and Lerczak through WHOI’s Center for Ocean, Seafloor and Marine Observing Systems (COSMOS). Building on WHOI’s experience designing, constructing and operating marine observing systems of many types around the world, WHOI established COSMOS (http://www.whoi.edu/COSMOS) in 2004 to provide administrative, management and systems engineering oversight of large observatory and observing systems projects. Presently in its early stages, the vision is that COSMOS will coordinate and facilitate observing systems by providing a central contact point for scientists within WHOI and at universities and research labs around the country who use WHOI-operated systems and facilities. WHOI has made a commitment to support COSMOS, and in particular to

23

maintain and develop the Center in concert with ORION activities. The project proposed here will draw on COSMOS for coordination of (1) sensor calibration, (2) mooring design and fabrication, (3) ship operations associated with mooring deployment and recovery, (4) data management and metadata standards, and (5) AUV development and operation.

The CODAR and satellite remote sensing will be managed by Robert Chant through the Rutgers University Coastal Ocean Observation Lab (COOL). COOL includes an interdisciplinary scientific research group (http://marine.rutgers.edu/COOL), and an Operations Center (http://www.theCOOLroom.org/). Faculty and students comprising the scientific teams participate in collaborative research programs in which academic, industry and government partnerships are forged between physicists and biologists, scientists and engineers, and observationalists and modelers. The Operations Center maintains a sustained coastal ocean observatory that has provided real-time ocean data to the research and education groups since 1992, and now also serves as a training ground for Operational Oceanography students. The COOL Operations Center maintains one of the world’s most advanced coastal ocean observatories. Start-of-the-art sampling capabilities are continuously upgraded, as new technologies developed and demonstrated by the research group are transitioned into the operational setting of the Center. Cost-effective sustained spatial sampling of the coastal ocean is accomplished with a variety of new platforms and sensors that include the local acquisition of satellite imagery from the international constellation of thermal infrared and ocean color sensors, a triple-nested multi-static HF radar network for surface current mapping and waves and a shore-based meteorological system.

We anticipate the shipboard survey work to fall into two classes. Large-scale surveys of the estuarine/plume structure and small-scale tidal period surveys in the estuaries and in the near-field of the buoyant outflow. The larger scale surveys will feature mapping with the ECO-Shuttle and thus coordinated by Robert Chen. Smaller-scale estuarine surveys will involve a number of independent cruises and will be coordinated accordingly.

7. Data Management In addition PI's will work closely with the ORION engineering group in the selection, calibration, deployment and recovery of observatory infrastructure. We envision the ORION engineering group to produce monthly data reports that will be reviewed by parts of the SMC to insure data quality and consistency. Data generated by the proposed observing system will be made available through the world-wide-web in a manner similar to existing websites maintained at WHOI and Rutgers disseminating data from the MVCO and LEO-15 coastal observatories. Rutgers University Coastal Ocean Observation Lab (COOL) has archived and disseminated a variety of data since 1992 group (http://marine.rutgers.edu/COOL). This includes satellite imagery, both infared and ocean color, surface current maps from a coastal radar network, and in situ meteorological and oceanographic data. WHOI has been achiving and disseminating meteorological and oceanographic data from MVCO since 2001. Additionally, we will take advantage of the recently established Center for Ocean, Seafloor and Marine Observing Systems (COSMOS) at WHOI to coordinate and facilitate data management and distribution. We will build on these

24

existing data distribution networks and the associated data management experience. The goal is to make the archived data and the necessary metadata readily and easily accessible to scientists, educators, students, and federal agencies. Individual scientists will be responsible for processing their data and providing it to be archived at the Rutgers and WHOI archives and websites. The data fall into two general categories, near-real-time data that will be immediately and data that requires varying degrees of processing before it is useful. The near-real-time data includes satellite imagery, coastal radar maps, and subsets of the data acquired by the AUVs and from the telemetered moorings. This data will be made available on the world-wide-web in a manner similar to the existing COOL and MVCO websites. The near-real-time data will generally not be quality controlled. Data that has been processed and quality controlled will be archived and made available as soon as possible. The time needed before processed data is available will vary depending on the size of the data sets and the amount of processing needed before the data is useful. Individual investigators will be responsible for processing of their data and for providing the necessary meta data and a complete description of the data processing procedure.

8. Broader Impacts This planning proposal addresses the fundamental problem of exchange between estuarine and coastal environments. This exchange has a substantial impact on the ecological, chemical, and physical characteristics of both the estuary and the continental shelf and consequently is the key element in a variety of important scientific problems with societal relevance. Exchange between estuarine and coastal environments is a critical part of the life cycle of many key resource species, impacts the distributions of anthropogenic materials such as nutrients and pollutants, and may be a globally significant component of the flux of carbon to the ocean. Progress on these problems has been limited because of the complex temporal and spatial variability of the processes that influence exchange. The implementation of new, sophisticated observational techniques and long-term sampling approaches such as those cited in this document can only be realized in the context of a coastal observatory system.

25

References Aller, R., 1998. Mobile deltaic and continental shelf muds as suboxic, fluidized bed reactors. Marine Chemistry, 61, 143-155. Anbar AD, Creaser RA, Papanastassiou DA and Wasserburg GJ (1992) Rhenium in seawater: Confirmation of generally conservative behavior. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 56, 4099-4103. Arnold WS, Hitchcock GL, Frischer ME, Wanninkhof R, Sheng PY (2005) Dispersal of an introduced larval cohort in a coastal lagoon. Limnol Oceanogr 50:587-597 Bauer, J. E., E. Druffel, D. M. Wolgast, and S. Griffin. 2002. Temporal and spatial variability in sources and cycling of DOC and POC in the northwest Atlantic continental margin. Deep-Sea Res. II 49:4387-4419. Bauer, J. E., and E. M. Druffel. 1998. Ocean margins as a significant source of organic matter to the deep open ocean. Nature 392:482-485. Bauer, J. E., E. R. Druffel, D. M. Wolgast, and S. Griffin. 2001. Sources and cycling of dissolved and particulate organic radiocarbon in the northwest Atlantic continental margin. Glob. Biogeoch. Cycl. 15:615-636. Becker BJ, Fodrie FJ, McMillan PA, Levin LA (2005) Spatial and temporal variation in trace elemental fingerprints of mytilid mussel shells: A precursor to invertebrate larval tracking. Limnology and Oceanography 50:48-61 Berdeal, I.G., Hickey, B.M., and Kawase, M., 2002.Influence of wind stress and ambient flow on a high discharge river plume. J. Geophys. Res., 107, doi:10.1029/2001JC000932. Blanton, J.O., Oey, L.-Y., Amft, J., and Lee, T.N., 1989. Advection of momentum and buoyancy in a coastal frontal zone. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 19, 98--115. Borges, A. V., and M. Frankignoulle. 1999. Daily and seasonal variations of the partial pressure of CO2 in surface seawater along Belgian and southern Dutch coastal areas. J Mar. Syst. 19:251-266. Cai, W.-J. 2003. Riverine inorganic carbon flux and rate of biological uptake in the Mississippi River plume. Geophy. Res. Lett. 30:1-4. Cloern, J. E. 2001. Our evolving conceptual model of the coastal eutrophication problem. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 210:223-263. Cole, J. J., and N. F. Caraco. 2001. Carbon in catchments: connecting terrestrial carbon losses with aquatic metabolism. Mar. Fresh. Res. 52:101-110.

26

Cole, J. J., N. F. Caraco, G. W. Kling, and T. K. Kratz. 1994. Carbon dioxide supersaturation in the surface waters of lakes. Science 265:1568-1570. Chao, S.-Y., and W. C. Boicourt, 1986. Onset of estuarine plumes. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 16, 2137--2149. Chao, S.-Y., 1988. Wind-driven motions of estuarine plumes. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 18, 1144--1166. Chapman, D. C., and S. J. Lentz, 1994. Trapping of a coastal density front by the bottom boundary layer. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 24, 1464--1479. Charette, M.A., K.O., Buesseler, and J.E. Andrews. 2001. Utility of radium isotopes for evaluating the input and transport of groundwater-derived nitrogen to a Cape Cod estuary. Limnology and Oceanography, 46, 465-470. Colodner D. (1991) The marine geochemistry of rhenium, iridium and platinum. PhD dissertation, MIT-WHOI Joint Program in Oceanography. 269 pp. Colodner D, Sachs J, Ravizza G, Turekian K, Edmond J and Boyle E (1993) The geochemical cycle of rhenium: a reconnaissance. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 117, 205-211. Colodner D, Edmond J and Boyle E (1995) Rhenium in the Black Sea: comparison with molybdenum and uranium. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 131, 1-15. DiBacco C, Sutton D, McConnico L (2001) Vertical migration behavior and horizontal distribution of brachyuran larvae in a low-inflow estuary: implications for bay-ocean exchange. Marine Ecology - Progress Series 217:191-206 Duarte, C. M., S. Agusti, P. A. delGiorgio, and J. J. Cole. 1999. Is the open ocean heterotrophic? Science 284:1735. Ellien C, Thiebaut E, Dumas F, Salomon JC, Nival P (2004) A modelling study of the respective role of hydrodynamic processes and larval mortality on larval dispersal and recruitment of benthic invertebrates: example of Pectinaria koreni (Annelida : Polychaeta) in the Bay of Seine (English Channel). Journal of Plankton Research 26:117-132). Elsinger, R.J., and Moore, W.S., 1980, 226Ra behavior in the Pee Dee River--Winyah Bay Estuary: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 48, 239-249. Epifanio, C. E., A. K. Masse, and R. W. Garvine, 1989. Transport of blue crab larvae by surface currents off Delaware Bay, USA. Marine Ecology Prog. Series, 54, 35--41. Epifanio CE, Garvine RW (2001) Larval transport on the Atlantic continental shelf of North America: a review. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 52:51-77.

27

Falkowski, P. G., R. T. Barber, and V. Smetacek. 1998. Biogeochemical controls and feedbacks on ocean primary production. Science 281:200-206. Field, C. B., M. J. Behrenfeld, J. T. Randerson, and P. Falkowski. 1998. Primary production of the biosphere: Integrating terrestrial and oceanic components. Science 281:237-240. Fong, D. A., W. R. Geyer, and R. P. Signell, 1997. The wind-forced response of a bouyant coastal current: observations of the western Gulf of Maine plume. Journal of Marine Systems, 12, 69--81. Fong, D.A., and Geyer, W.R., 2001. Response of a river plume during an upwelling favorable wind event. J. Geophys. Res., 106, 1067--1084. Forward RB, Tankersley RA, Welch JM (2003) Selective tidal-stream transport of the blue crab Callinectes sapidus: An overview. Bulletin of Marine Science 72:347-365. Frankignoulle, M., G. Abril, A. Borges, I. Bourge, C. Canon, B. Delile, E. Libert, and J.-M. Theate. 1998. Carbon dioxide emission from European estuaries. Science 282:434-436. Fuchs HL, Mullineaux L, Solow A (2004) Sinking behavior of gastropod larvae (Ilyanassa obsoleta) in turbulence. Limnology and Oceanography 49:1937-1948. Garvine, R. W. 1985. A simple model of estuarine subtidal fluctuations forced by local and remote wind stress. Journal of Geophysical Research, 90, 11945-11948. Garvine, R. W. 1991. Subtidal frequency estuary-shelf interaction: Observations near Delaware Bay. Journal of Geophysical Research, 96, 7049-7064. Garvine, R. W., 1999. Penetration of buoyant coastal discharge onto the continental shelf: A numerical model experiment. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 29, 1892--1909. Geyer, W.R., J.D. Woodruff and P. Traykovski, 2001. Sediment transport and trapping in the Hudson River estuary. Estuaries, 24(5): 670-679. Geyer, W.R., R.P. Signell, D. A. Fong, J. Wang, D.M. Anderson and B.P. Keafer, 2004. The freshwater transport and dynamics of the Western Maine Coastal Current. Continental Shelf Research, 24 (12): 1339-1357. Goodman, L., .E. R. Levine, and R. Lueck, 2005: On closing the turbulent kinetic energy budget from an AUV, J Atmos. Ocean. Technol., submitted 12/04. Gosner KL (1978) A field guide to the Atlantic seashore, Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston.

28

Hansson, S., Hobbie, J.E., Elmgren, R., Larsson, U., Fry, B. and Johansson, S., 1997. The stable nitrogen isotope ratio as a marker of food-web interactions and fish migration. Ecology, 78 2249-2257. Hallock, Z.R., and Marmorino, G.O., 2002. Observations of the response of a buoyant estuarine plume to upwelling favorable winds. J. Geophys. Res., 107, doi:10.1029/2000JC000698. Hickey, B. M., L. J. Pietrafesa, D. A. Jay, and W. C. Boicourt, 1998. The Columbia River Plume Study: Subtidal variability in the velocity and salinity fields. Journal of Geophysical Research, 103(C5), 10,339--10,368. Houghton, R.W., Tilburg, C.E., Garvine, R.W., and Fong, A., 2004. Delaware River plume response to a strong upwelling-favorable wind event. Geophy. Res. Let., 31, L07302,doi:10.1029/2003GL018988. Johnson, D.R., Weidemann, A., Arnone, R., and Davis, C.O., 2001. Chesapeake Bay outflow plume and coastal upwelling events: Physical and optical properties. J. Geophys. Res., 106, 11613--11622. Johnson, D.R., Miller, J., and Schofield, O., 2003. Dynamics and optics of the Hudson River outflow plume. J. Geophys. Res., 108, doi:10.1029/2002JC001485. Keeling, R. F., R. P. Najjar, M. L. Bender, and P. P. Tans. 1993. What Atmospheric Oxygen Measurements Can Tell Us About the Global Carbon-Cycle. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 7:37-67. Kempe, S. 1982. Long-term records of CO2 pressure fluctuations in fresh waters. Mitteilungen Aus Dem Geologish-Paleontologishen Institut Der Unersitaet Hamburg 52:91-332. Key, R. M., R.F. Stallard, W.S. Moore, and J.L. Sarmiento (1985) Distribution and flux of 226Ra and 228Ra in the Amazon River estuary. Journal of Geophysical Research, 90, 6995-7004. Kourafalou, V. H., L.-Y. Oey, J. D. Wang, and T. N. Lee, 1996. The fate of river discharge on the continental shelf, 1, Modeling the river plume and the inner shelf coastal current. Journal of Geophysical Research, 101(C2), 3415--3434. Kourafalou, V. H., T.N. Lee, L.-Y. Oey, and J. D. Wang, 1996. The fate of river discharge on the continental shelf,2, Transport of coastal low-salinity waters under realistic wind and tidal forcing. Journal of Geophysical Research, 101(C2), 3435--3456. Krest, J. M., W.S. Moore, and Rama. 1999. 226Ra and 228Ra in the mixing zones of the Mississippi and Atchafalaya Rivers: indicators of groundwater input. Marine Chemistry, 64, 129-152. Lentz, S.J., and Helfrich, K.R., 2002. Buoyant gravity currents along a sloping bottom in a rotating frame. J. Fluid Mech., 464, 251--278.

29

Lentz, S. J., S. Elgar and R. T. Guza, 2003. Observations of the flow field near the nose of a buoyant coastal current. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 33, 933−943.

Lentz, S. J., 2004. The response of buoyant coastal plumes to upwelling-favorable winds. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 34(11), 2458-2469. Lentz, S. J. and J. Largier. The influence of wind forcing on the Chesapeake Bay buoyant coastal current. Submitted to Journal of Physical Oceanography. Levine, E.R, and R.G. Lueck, 1999: Turbulence measurements from an autonomous underwater vehicle. J Atmos. Oceanic Technol., Special Issue on Turbulence in the Ocean, 16, 11, part 1, 1533-1544. Liu, K., L. Atkinson, C. T. Chen, S. Gao, J. Hall, R. W. Macdonald, L. T. McManus, and R. Quinones. 2000. Exploring continental margin carbon fluxes on a global scale. EOS 81:1-3. Masiello, C. A., and E. R. M. Druffel. 2001. Carbon isotope geochemistry of the Santa Clara river. Glob. Biogeoch. Cycl. 15:407-416. Meade, R. H., 1972. Transport and deposition of sediments in estuaries. The Geological Society of America, 133, 91-120. Milliman, J. D., and R. H. Meade, Jan. 1983. World-wide delivery of river sediment to the oceans. J. of Geology, 91, pp. 1-21. Moore, W. S., H.W. Feely, and Y.-H. Li (1980) Radium isotopes in subarctic waters. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 49, 329-340. Moore, W. S., H. Astwood, and C. Lindstrom (1995) Radium isotopes in coastal waters on the Amazon shelf. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 59, 4285-4298. Moore, W. S., and R. Arnold (1996) Measurement of 223Ra and 224Ra in coastal waters using a delayed coincidence counter. Journal of Geophysical Research, 101, 1321-1329. Moore, W. S. (2000a) Determining coastal mixing rates using radium isotopes. Continenal Shelf Research, 20, 1993-2007. Moore, W. S. (2000b) Ages of continental shelf waters determined from 223Ra and 224Ra. Journal of Geophysical Research, 105, 22,117-23,894. Munchow, A., and R. W. Garvine, 1993. Buoyancy and wind forcing of a coastal current. Journal of Marine Research, 51, 293--322. Natunewicz CC, Epifanio CE (2001) Spatial and temporal scales of patches of crab larvae in coastal waters. Marine Ecology Progress Series 212:217-222.

30

Nittrouer, C.A., 1999. STRATAFORM: overview of its design and synthesis of its results Marine Geology. Vol. 154, no. 1-4, pp. 3-12. Pegram WJ, S Krishnaswami, GE Ravizza and KK Turekian (1992) The record of sea water 187Os/186Os variations through the Cenozoic. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 113, 569-576. Peucker-Ehrenbrink B and G Ravizza (2000) The marine osmium isotope record. Terra Nova 12, 205-219. Ravizza G and BK Esser (1993) A possible link between the seawater osmium isotope record and weathering of ancient sedimentary organic matter. Chem. Geol. 107, 255-258. Raymond, P. A., and J. E. Bauer. 2001a. DOC cycling in a temperate estuary: A mass balance approach using natural C-14 and C-13 isotopes. Limnology and Oceanography 46:655-667. Raymond, P. A., and J. E. Bauer. 2001b. Use of C-14 and C-13 natural abundances for evaluating riverine, estuarine, and coastal DOC and POC sources and cycling: a review and synthesis. Organic Geochemistry 32:469-485. Raymond, P. A., J. E. Bauer, and J. J. Cole. 2000. Atmospheric CO2 evasion, dissolved inorganic carbon production, and net heterotrophy in the York River estuary. Limnology and Oceanography 45:1707-1717. Raymond, P. A., and C. S. Hopkinson. 2003. Ecosystem modulation of dissolved carbon age in a temperate marsh-dominated estuary. Ecosystems 6:694-705. Raymond PA and JE Bauer (2001a) Use of 14C and 13C natural abundances for evaluating riverine, estuarine, and coastal DOC and POC sources and cycling: a review and synthesis. Org. Geochem. 32, 469-485. Raymond PA and JE Bauer (2001b) DOC cycling in a temperate estuary: A mass balance approach using natural 14C and 13C isotopes. Limnol. Oceanogr. 46 (3), 655-667. Rennie, S., J. L. Largier, and S. J. Lentz, 1999. Observations of low-salinity coastal current pulses downstream of Chesapeake Bay. Journal of Geophysical Research, 104(C8), 18,227--18,240. Richey, J. E. 2004. Pathways of atmospheric CO2 through fluvial systems. in C. B. Field and M. R. Raupach, editors. The Global Carbon Cycle. Island Press, London. Roman MR, Boicourt WC (1999) Dispersion and recruitment of crab larvae in the chesapeake bay plume: Physical and biological controls. Estuaries 22:563-574. Sanders, T.M., and Garvine, R.W., 2001: Fresh water delivery to the continental shelf and subsequent mixing: An observational study. J. Geophys. Res., 106, 27087--27101.

31

Valle-Levinson, A., Wong, K.-C., and Bosley, K.T., 2001: Observations of the wind-induced exchange at the entrance to Chesapeake Bay. J. Mar. Res., 59, 391--416. Sarmiento, J. L., and N. Gruber. 2002. Sinks for anthropogenic carbon. Physics Today 55:30-36. Smith, S. V., and J. T. Hollibaugh. 1993. Coastal metabolism and the oceanic organic carbon balance. Reviews of Geophysics 31:75-89. Spiker, E. C. 1980. The behavior of 14C and 13C in estuarine water: Effects of in situ CO2 production and atmospheric exchange. Radiocarbon 22:647-654. Thorrold SR, Latkoczy C, Swart PK, Jones CM (2001) Natal homing in a marine fish metapopulation. Science 291:297-299. Ver, L., F. T. Mackenzie, and A. Lerman. 1994. Modelling preindustrial C-N-P-S biogeochemical cycling in the land-coast margin system. Chmosphere 29:855-887. Walker B and Peucker-Ehrenbrink B (2004) Rhenium and molybdenum in rivers and estuaries. Eos Trans. AGU 85, No. 47, Fall Meet. Suppl., Abstract 8525. Walker B and Peucker-Ehrenbrink B (2005) Evidence for non-conservative behavior of rhenium in aquatic systems. Poster presented at the ASLO meeting in Salt Lake City, February 2005 Whitney, M.M., and Garvine, R.W., 2004. Wind influence on a coastal buoyant outflow. J. Geophys. Res., 109, in press. Williams, P. J. L., and D. G. Bower. 1999. Determination of organic carbon balance in the oceans from field observations-a re-evaluation. Science 27:1735 Wiseman, W. J., N. N. Rabelais, R. E. Turner, S. P. Dinnel, and A. MacNaughton, 1997. Seasonal and interannual variability with the Louisaina coastal current: Stratification and hypoxia. Journal of Marine Systems, 12, 237--248. Xing, J., and A. M. Davies, 1999. The effect of wind direction and mixing upon the spreading of a buoyant plume in a non-tidal regime. Continental Shelf Research, 19(11), 1437--1483. Yankovsky, A. E., and D. C. Chapman, 1997. A simple theory for the fate of buoyant coastal discharges. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 27, 1386--1401. Yund, PO, Gaines, SD, and MD Bertness. 1991. Cylindrical tube traps for larval sampling. Limnol. Oceanogr. 36:1167-1177. Zacherl DC, Manriquez PH, Paradis G, Day RW, Castilla JC, Warner RR, Lea DW, Gaines SD (2003) Trace elemental fingerprinting of gastropod statoliths to study larval dispersal trajectories. Mar Ecol-Prog Ser 248:297-303.

Budget Justification This budget is extraordinarily high for several reasons. First, there is a significant amount of infrastructure cost represented in the budget, such as the cost of mooring systems. Second, there are a number of related investigations operating simultaneously, with multiple field sites. This leads to a large amount of PI time as well as technical support requirements. Senior Personnel Geyer would be the overall project coordinator. He would also make direct scientific contributions to the physical transport studies. Lentz would be responsible for the plume dynamics studies. Lerczak would be in charge of the estuarine mouth exchange studies. Mullineaux would be in charge of the larval transport studies. Charette would lead the investigations of radium dispersal. Peucker-Ehrenbrink would be responsible for the elemental flux studies. Chant at Rutgers requests 2 months of summer salary each year and will match the commitment level of WHOI PIs by applying 1 month per year of their state-supported academic-year time to this project. Chant will oversee the CODAR and Satellite systems and integrate these datasets with the shipboard and moored observations. Chen of the University of Massachusetts at Boston will participate in instrument development, field deployment (one 3-5 day ICOS van cruise per year, plus small boat Mini-Shuttle work) and testing of instruments. McGillis will oversee instrument development, meteorological flux measurements, and data analysis at Columbia University for a total of 1.0 month per year. A total of 1.0 summer month salary per year is requested by Raymond at Yale University. Raymond will be active in multiple components of this proposal including mass spec development, carbon and nutrient analysis, isotopic measurements (13C, 14C and 15N), and data synthesis and application. The overall University of Massachusetts-Dartmouth effort will be managed by Goodman. This includes design and implementation of the three-dimensional observational program, and turbulence and subgrid scale modeling in close liaison with AESOP numerical modeling efforts. Levine will be involved in the AUV turbulence observations, their interpretation, and model integration. Individual scientists will be responsible for processing their data and providing it to be archived at the Rutgers and WHOI archives and websites. Other Personnel Sisson will have overall responsibility for field operations. He will also coordinate and perform moored instrument preparation. Von der Heydt will be responsible for data telemetry. Worrilow, Marquette, and Lord will assist Sisson with mooring operations and instrument preparation. Purcell, Kukulya and Packard will be responsible for AUV operations. Two WHOI graduate students will be involved in the project. Ware, Liberatore and Hammar will be responsible for the moored profiling systems. Hurst will be the assistant project administrator. Tomeo and Clifford will also provide administrative support.

Rutgers requests 1.75 approximately full-time professional level research staff that will be leveraged with existing support staff. The CODAR network will be operated by the Coastal Ocean Observation Lab’s (COOL) Operations Center. Here we request support for Dr. Hugh Roarty to similarly contribute to the network operations and ensure that this project’s data needs are met. Based on past experience, Dr. Roarty’s time will be split approximately equally between the hardware operational needs of the network and the generation of the required data products for this specific project. Satellite imagery also will be provided to this project by the COOL Operations Center and 6 months of salary are requested for Jen Bosch to maintain hardware and software components of the X-Band and L-Band receivers, download passes, process, disseminate and archive the passes. Funds are also requested for Elias Hunter who, together with the PI, will develop modules that will integrate the satellite and CODAR data with other components of the observatory to produce feature models of the 3-D structure of the coastal ocean. University of Massachusetts-Boston personnel include a research associate and a senior technician to participate in instrument development, field deployment (one 3-5 day ICOS van cruise per year, plus small boat Mini-Shuttle work) and testing of instruments, instrument maintenance and sample collection, sample and data processing and analysis. Salaries include projected inflation. Columbia University requests salary funds for an EECS engineer, a mechanical/chemical engineer, and a professional assistant. Columbia University also requests salary for one graduate student to assist with each year of the project. Yale University requests partial salary (6mo/yr) of one technician for each year. The technician will be in charge of preparing and running isotopic measurements and bulk carbon and nutrient analysis. Money is also requested for the summer salary for one FES masters students who will be involved in the project as part of their research. Yale University fringe benefits are 30 % in Yr 1 plus an additional 2% per year. Fringe benefits for the masters student is 10% for the technician plus an additional 1% per year. University of Massachusetts-Dartmouth key personnel will include Takeyoshi Nagai of Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology and Amit Tandon of SMAST who will be responsible for the TurbOMap work. Equipment Seven REMUS AUVs will be purchased. Fourteen “big” moorings will be constructed at a cost (including materials and labor) of about $140,000 each. These systems are to provide the vertical delivery of the sampling systems as well as power and telemetry. Twenty “small” moorings will cost $5,000 each. Although these are called “moorings,” they will have no permanent surface expression. Four conventional meteorological buoys will also be purchased or constructed. We will purchase 34 ADCPs—one for each of the moorings. Twenty-four McClane timeseries samplers will be purchased, 12 for the larvae and radium studies, and 12 for the other chemical sampling. One video plankton recorder will be purchased or constructed. Thirty-four profiling CTDs will be purchased from YSI, where they are now under development. These are winched profilers, originally developed at WHOI (Doherty et al., 2001) for high energy environments. Three Delayed Coincidence Counters will be purchased for the radium measurements. Rutgers requests funds to purchase (3) 25-MHz CODAR units. Included are funds for a shed to store the

equipment on site. Monthly electrical power costs for the CODAR sites is requested. Supplies include upgrades of UPS and powerstone systems that enable remote access via telephone or Ethernet, lightning protection, replacement antennas and connectors. University of Massachusetts-Boston equipment costs include a tow cable with 18 conductors, 3 fiber optics, and a teflon tube (200 m) for the ECOShuttle in Year 2 to replace the current cable which is showing signs of wear. Not included in this budget are costs associated with deploying and maintaining moorings (endurance moorings at all 4 river mouths; pioneer moorings at freshwater end member and mid-salinity). Columbia University requests funds for an NDIR 840, an NDIR 7000, and a met/flux package. Yale University requests funds for 3 SRS-RGA200 mass spec with an electron multiplier and vacuum pump (11k each) and 3 Shimadzu TNPC-4110C C/N/P analyzers (34k each). Travel The travel costs will cover coordination meetings, travel to meet vessels during field operations, and scientific meetings. Other WHOI mooring supplies include chains and anchors. AUV supplies mainly include electronic components. Publication costs are to publicize the results of this project. Tuition for two WHOI students is partially covered by the budget. The ICP-MS facility will be used for elemental analysis. The rest is cost-shared by WHOI. The budget includes other costs associated with preparing samples for ICP-MS analyses in WHOI clean laboratories. Engineering costs for adapting the McLane time series sampler for trace metal clean sampling are also included. Ship time on WHOI’s 60’ research vessel Tioga will cover turnarounds as well as rapid-response sampling. Approximately 20 days per year will also be required of a coastal class NSF vessel. Rutgers: PIs will take every advantage of reduced publication rates at peer-reviewed journals. A small amount is required for the remainder of the costs and for the conference registration fees that must be paid for abstract publication. A data server/archiving system is required to store the extensive observational datasets, the derived products and the modeling results so that they are available to all project scientists and to future collaborators. The budget includes funds for software and hardware upgrades and software licensing. The budget also requests funds for one new computer each year. Ship time is requested to collect samples for calibration of moored and satellite data. Funds are requested for Chip Haldeman who will oversee the shipboard observations. University of Massachusetts-Boston materials and supplies include chemicals, glassware, and other consumables to support underway sampling as well as discrete sample analysis. Shipping is the estimated cost to load and transport the ICOS van (17,000 lb) and winch to meet the research vessel for 1 cruise per year. Ship time refers to small boats (for example those at Miller’s Launch, Staten Island) at $150 per hour. Mini-Shuttle deployments allow mooring data to be calibrated and put in a high spatial

resolution context. Maintenance includes annual calibration of CTDs, replacement parts for ECOShuttle and Mini-Shuttle, and service on various instruments (AC-9, GCMS, Fluorometers, Chelsea Shuttle controller, etc). Columbia University: Other costs include lab and field supplies, publication costs, graduate student tuition, ship time at 3/6/6/6/6 days per year, shipping, and communications. Yale University: In year 1, 18k is requested for laboratory equipment (standards, glassware etc). In the following years, this price is dropped to 8k per year as some of the material is re-usable. Yale also requests publication and communication fees ($250 per year). Yale requests 15k per year for isotopic analysis. 14C analysis when prepped to CO2 in the Raymond lab are ~$150 apiece and we are budgeting for ~70 14C samples per year. 13C and 15N analysis can be made at the Yale Isotope Facility for ~$15 each leaving money for ~350 stable isotope analysis. Money is also requested (4k/yr) for additional bulk carbon (DOC, POC and DIC) and nutrient (N&P) analysis, which will be run at Yale. The Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution calculates overhead rates (both Laboratory Costs and General & Administrative Costs) as a percent of total direct salaries and benefits, as allowed by OMB Circular A-122. Direct salaries exclude overtime-premium pay. A proposed labor month is equal to 152 hours or 1824 hours annually versus 2080 hours (40 hours/week for 52 weeks). The difference is for vacations, holidays, sick time, and other paid absences, which are included in Employee Benefits. The rates included in the proposal are negotiated with ONR or they are estimates. When estimated rates are finalized, costs will be in accordance with the rate agreement. Graduate student stipends are included in the total direct salary costs. However, they are not included in the benefits base, and only 1⁄2 of the Laboratory Cost rate is applied to the stipend because it is estimated that the GRA occupies a laboratory only 1⁄2 of his/her time, and the balance is spent in education activities. Fifty-five percent (55%) of the GRAs' tuition is included as a direct cost in this budget. The Institution provides the balance from Institution endowment funds, including 100% of summer tuition. With the assistance of Pricewaterhouse Coopers, WHOI undertook a study to determine what our 1997 combined F&A overhead rate would be, if we used the MTDC method used by most Universities, which are subject to OMB Circular A-21. We repeated the study and determined that our rate for 2003 would be 48.06%--lower than most research institutions and research-intensive universities. The salaries for WHOI are calculated using an automated program that has built in inflation and overhead rates forecast for future years; this was the only method available for salary computations. All other WHOI costs are based on 2005 prices.

1/01/07 - 1/01/08 - 1/01/09 - 1/01/10 - 1/01/11/ -12/31/07 12/31/08 12/31/09 12/31/10 12/31/11 Totals

A. SENIOR PERSONNEL 1. W.R. Geyer, Principal Investigator, WHOI 42,323 44,439 46,664 48,993 51,443 233,862 2. S. Lentz, Co-PI, WHOI 28,559 29,987 31,487 33,060 34,711 157,804 3. J. Lerczak, Co-PI, WHOI 16,430 17,250 18,112 19,015 19,968 90,775 4. L. Mullineaux, Co-PI, WHOI 36,298 38,116 40,019 42,019 44,123 200,575 5. M. Charette, Co-PI, WHOI 19,230 20,192 21,199 22,262 23,375 106,258 6. B. Peucker-Ehrenbrink, Co-PI, WHOI 11,124 11,678 12,264 12,877 13,520 61,463 7. R. Chant, Co-PI, Rutgers 15,111 15,111 15,111 15,111 15,111 75,555 8. B. Chen, Co-PI, U. Mass. Boston 9,500 9,975 10,474 10,997 11,547 52,493 9. G. Bernard Gardner, Co-PI, U. Mass. Boston 12,000 12,600 13,230 13,892 14,586 66,308 10. W. McGillis, Co-PI, Columbia University 10,150 10,658 11,190 11,750 12,337 56,085 11. P. Raymond, Co-PI, Yale University 7,887 8,202 8,531 8,872 9,227 42,719 12. L. Goodman, Co-PI, U. Mass. Dartmouth 6,774 6,910 7,048 7,189 7,331 35,252 13. E. Levine, Co-PI, U. Mass. Dartmouth 6,774 6,910 7,048 7,189 7,331 35,252 Total Senior Personnel 222,160 232,028 242,377 253,226 264,610 1,214,401

B. OTHER PERSONNEL 2. Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution 394,429 397,537 393,100 412,759 433,379 2,031,204 Rutgers University 85,000 85,000 85,000 85,000 85,000 425,000 U. Massachusetts, Boston 20,000 21,000 22,050 23,153 24,310 110,513 Columbia University 35,029 36,781 38,619 40,550 42,577 193,556 Yale University 20,000 20,800 21,632 22,497 23,397 108,326 U. Massachusetts, Dartmouth 2,826 3,083 3,097 3,097 3,383 15,486 Total Other Personnel 557,284 564,201 563,498 587,056 612,046 2,884,085 3. Graduate Students, WHOI 52,422 54,538 56,726 58,988 61,322 283,996 Graduate Student, Rutgers 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 150,000 Graduate Student, Columbia University 24,560 25,939 27,397 28,493 29,633 136,022 Graduate Student, Yale University 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 20,000 Total Graduate Students 110,982 114,477 118,123 121,481 124,955 590,018 5. Secretarial - Clerical, WHOI 14,456 15,178 15,936 16,732 17,569 79,871 Total Secretarial - Clerical 14,456 15,178 15,936 16,732 17,569 79,871

TOTAL SALARIES & WAGES 904,882$ 925,884$ 939,934$ 978,495$ 1,019,180$ 4,768,375$

FRINGE BENEFITS Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution 259,924 265,247 267,281 280,644 294,669 1,367,765 Rutgers University 33,036 33,036 33,036 33,036 33,036 165,180 U. Massachusetts, Boston 9,844 10,321 10,822 11,348 11,900 54,235 Columbia University 9,247 9,710 10,195 10,706 11,240 51,098 Yale University 8,766 9,101 10,303 10,696 11,104 49,970 U. Massachusetts, Dartmouth 9,155 9,317 9,456 9,611 9,755 47,294 Total Fringe Benefits 329,972 336,732 341,093 356,041 371,704 1,735,542

TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES & FRINGE BENEFITS 1,234,854 1,262,616 1,281,027 1,334,536 1,390,884 6,503,917

D. EQUIPMENT Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution 8,311,000 8,311,000 Rutgers University 375,000 375,000 U. Massachusetts, Boston 28,000 28,000 Columbia University 89,350 89,350 178,700 Yale University 135,000 135,000 U. Massachusetts, Dartmouth 80,000 40,000 25,000 145,000 TOTAL EQUIPMENT 8,990,350 157,350 25,000 9,172,700

E. TRAVEL 1. Domestic Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution 10,300 10,300 10,300 10,300 10,300 51,500 Rutgers University 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 50,000 U. Massachusetts, Boston 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 35,000 Columbia University 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 25,000 Yale University 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 17,500 U. Massachusetts, Dartmouth 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 15,000 TOTAL TRAVEL 38,800 38,800 38,800 38,800 38,800 194,000

Transformation and Exchange Between Estuaries and the Continental Shelf:

1 January 2007 - 31 December 2011SUMMARY BUDGET - Page 1 of 2

Integration of Physical, Biogeochemical, and Biological Processes

G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS 1. Materials and Supplies Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 500,000 U. Massachusetts, Boston 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 40,000 Columbia University 30,200 8,600 5,600 5,600 5,600 55,600 Yale University 18,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 50,000 U. Massachusetts, Dartmouth 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 15,000 Total Materials and Supplies 159,200 127,600 124,600 124,600 124,600 # 660,600 2. Publication Costs Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution 3,000 4,000 4,500 11,500 Rutgers University 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 15,000 U. Massachusetts, Boston 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 4,000 Columbia University 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 4,800 Yale University 250 250 250 250 250 1,250 Total Publication Costs 3,250 5,450 8,450 9,450 9,950 36,550 3. Consultant Services Rutgers University 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 50,000 Total Consultant Services 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 50,000 4. Computer Services Rutgers University 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 25,000 Total Computer Services 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 25,000 6. Other Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution 145,057 199,057 199,057 199,057 130,057 872,285 Rutgers University 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 200,000 U. Massachusetts, Boston 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 80,000 Columbia University 23,606 26,249 28,186 29,171 29,204 136,416 Yale University 19,000 19,000 19,000 19,000 19,000 95,000 U. Massachusetts, Dartmouth 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 5,500 Total Other 244,763 301,406 303,343 304,328 235,361 1,389,201 TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS 422,213 449,456 451,393 453,378 384,911 2,161,351

H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS 10,686,217 1,908,222 1,796,220 1,826,714 1,814,595 18,031,968

I. INDIRECT COSTS Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution 813,157 830,498 838,033 879,553 923,103 4,284,344 Rutgers University 100,731 100,731 100,731 100,731 100,731 503,655 U. Massachusetts, Boston 43,231 45,096 46,502 47,979 49,530 232,338 Columbia University 61,167 53,748 54,928 57,017 58,694 285,554 Yale University 51,691 46,262 47,762 48,777 49,834 244,326 U. Massachusetts, Dartmouth 13,712 13,944 14,178 14,444 14,668 70,946 TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS 1,083,689 1,090,279 1,102,134 1,148,501 1,196,560 5,621,163

J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS 11,769,906$ 2,998,501$ 2,898,354$ 2,975,215$ 3,011,155$ 23,653,131$

Transformation and Exchange Between Estuaries and the Continental Shelf: Integration of Physical, Biogeochemical, and Biological Processes

1 January 2007 - 31 December 2011SUMMARY BUDGET - Page 2 of 2

SUMMARY PROPOSAL BUDGET – Year 1

FOR ORION USE ONLY

ORGANIZATION Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Rutgers University, U. Mass. Boston, Columbia University, Yale University, U. Mass. Dartmouth

PROPOSAL NO. DURATION (MONTHS)

Proposed Granted PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR/PROJECT DIRECTOR Wayne R. Geyer, WHOI

AWARD NO.

A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD, Co-PIs, Faculty and Other Senior Associates Funded Funds Funds List each separately with name and title. (A.7. Show number in brackets) Person-months Requested By Granted

CAL ACAD SUMR Proposer (If Different) 1. W.R. Geyer, PI, WHOI 4.0 __ __ 42,323 $_____ 2. S. Lentz, Co-PI, WHOI 3.0 __ __ 28,559 _____ 3. J. Lerczak, Co-PI, WHOI 3.0 __ __ 16,430 _____ 4. L. Mullineaux, Co-PI, WHOI 4.0 __ __ 36,298 _____ 5. M. Charette, Co-PI, WHOI 3.0 __ __ 19,230 _____ 6. ( 8 ) OTHERS (LIST INDIVIDUALLY ON BUDGET EXPLANATION PAGE) __ __ __ _____ _____ 7. (13 ) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1-6) __ __ __ 222,160 _____ B. OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS) 1. (___) POSTDOCTORAL ASSOCIATES __ __ __ _____ _____ 2. (___) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN, PROGRAMMER, ETC.) __ __ __ 557,284 _____ 3. (___) GRADUATE STUDENTS 110,982 _____ 4. (___) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS _____ _____ 5. (___) SECRETARIAL - CLERICAL (IF CHARGED DIRECTLY) 14,456 _____ 6. (___) OTHER _____ _____ TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A + B) 904,882 _____ C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS) 329,972 _____ TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A + B + C) 1,234,854 _____ D. EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING $5,000.) (see individual institution budget sheets) _____ _____ TOTAL EQUIPMENT 8,990,350 _____ E. TRAVEL 1. DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA, MEXICO AND U.S. POSSESSIONS) 38,800 _____ 2. FOREIGN _____ _____ F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT 1. STIPENDS $ _____ 2. TRAVEL _____ 3. SUBSISTENCE _____ 4. OTHER _____ TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS (_____) TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS _____ _____ G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS _____ _____ 1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 159,200 _____ 2. PUBLICATION/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION 3,250 _____ 3. CONSULTANT SERVICES 10,000 _____ 4. COMPUTER SERVICES 5,000 _____ 5. SUBAWARDS _____ _____ 6. OTHER _____ 244,763 _____ TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS 422,213 _____ H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G) 10,683,917 _____ I. INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) (SPECIFY RATE AND BASE) (see individual institution budget sheets) _____ TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) 1,083,689 _____ J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H + I) 11,767,606 _____ K. RESIDUAL FUNDS (IF FOR FURTHER SUPPORT OF CURRENT PROJECT SEE GPG II.D.7.j.) _____ _____ L. AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (J) OR (J MINUS K) $11,767,606 $_____ M. COST SHARING: PROPOSED LEVEL $_____ AGREED LEVEL IF DIFFERENT: $_____ PI/PD TYPED NAME AND SIGNATURE* DATE FOR ORION USE ONLY

INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATIONORG. REP. TYPED NAME & SIGNATURE* DATE Date Checked Date of Rate Sheet Initials-ORG _____ _____

OOI Form 1030 (10/99) Supersedes All Previous Editions *SIGNATURES REQUIRED ONLY FOR REVISED BUDGET (GPG III.C)

SUMMARY PROPOSAL BUDGET – Year 2 FOR ORION USE ONLY

ORGANIZATION Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Rutgers University, U. Mass. Boston, Columbia University, Yale University, U. Mass. Dartmouth

PROPOSAL NO. DURATION (MONTHS)

Proposed Granted PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR/PROJECT DIRECTOR Wayne R. Geyer, WHOI

AWARD NO.

A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD, Co-PIs, Faculty and Other Senior Associates Funded Funds Funds List each separately with name and title. (A.7. Show number in brackets) Person-months Requested By Granted

CAL ACAD SUMR Proposer (If Different) 1. W.R. Geyer, PI, WHOI 4.0 __ __ 44,439 $_____ 2. S. Lentz, Co-PI, WHOI 3.0 __ __ 29,987 _____ 3. J. Lerczak, Co-PI, WHOI 3.0 __ __ 17,250 _____ 4. L. Mullineaux, Co-PI, WHOI 4.0 __ __ 38,116 _____ 5. M. Charette, Co-PI, WHOI 3.0 __ __ 20,192 _____ 6. ( 8 ) OTHERS (LIST INDIVIDUALLY ON BUDGET EXPLANATION PAGE) __ __ __ _____ _____ 7. (13 ) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1-6) __ __ __ 232,028 _____ B. OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS) 1. (___) POSTDOCTORAL ASSOCIATES __ __ __ _____ _____ 2. (___) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN, PROGRAMMER, ETC.) __ __ __ 564,201 _____ 3. (___) GRADUATE STUDENTS 114,477 _____ 4. (___) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS _____ _____ 5. (___) SECRETARIAL - CLERICAL (IF CHARGED DIRECTLY) 15,178 _____ 6. (___) OTHER _____ _____ TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A + B) 925,884 _____ C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS) 336,732 _____ TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A + B + C) 1,262,616 _____ D. EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING $5,000.) (see individual institution budget sheets) _____ _____ TOTAL EQUIPMENT 157,350 _____ E. TRAVEL 1. DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA, MEXICO AND U.S. POSSESSIONS) 38,800 _____ 2. FOREIGN _____ _____ F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT 1. STIPENDS $ _____ 2. TRAVEL _____ 3. SUBSISTENCE _____ 4. OTHER _____ TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS (_____) TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS _____ _____ G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS _____ _____ 1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 127,600 _____ 2. PUBLICATION/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION 5,450 _____ 3. CONSULTANT SERVICES 10,000 _____ 4. COMPUTER SERVICES 5,000 _____ 5. SUBAWARDS _____ _____ 6. OTHER _____ 301,406 _____ TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS 449,456 _____ H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G) 1,907,922 _____ I. INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) (SPECIFY RATE AND BASE) (see individual institution budget sheets) _____ TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) 1,090,279 _____ J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H + I) 2,998,201 _____ K. RESIDUAL FUNDS (IF FOR FURTHER SUPPORT OF CURRENT PROJECT SEE GPG II.D.7.j.) _____ _____ L. AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (J) OR (J MINUS K) $2,998,201 $_____ M. COST SHARING: PROPOSED LEVEL $_____ AGREED LEVEL IF DIFFERENT: $_____ PI/PD TYPED NAME AND SIGNATURE* DATE FOR ORION USE ONLY

INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATIONORG. REP. TYPED NAME & SIGNATURE* DATE Date Checked Date of Rate Sheet Initials-ORG _____ _____

OOI Form 1030 (10/99) Supersedes All Previous Editions *SIGNATURES REQUIRED ONLY FOR REVISED BUDGET (GPG III.C)

SUMMARY PROPOSAL BUDGET – Year 3 FOR ORION USE ONLY

ORGANIZATION Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Rutgers University, U. Mass. Boston, Columbia University, Yale University, U. Mass. Dartmouth

PROPOSAL NO. DURATION (MONTHS)

Proposed Granted PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR/PROJECT DIRECTOR Wayne R. Geyer, WHOI

AWARD NO.

A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD, Co-PIs, Faculty and Other Senior Associates Funded Funds Funds List each separately with name and title. (A.7. Show number in brackets) Person-months Requested By Granted

CAL ACAD SUMR Proposer (If Different) 1. W.R. Geyer, PI, WHOI 4.0 __ __ 46,664 $_____ 2. S. Lentz, Co-PI, WHOI 3.0 __ __ 31,487 _____ 3. J. Lerczak, Co-PI, WHOI 3.0 __ __ 18,112 _____ 4. L. Mullineaux, Co-PI, WHOI 4.0 __ __ 40,019 _____ 5. M. Charette, Co-PI, WHOI 3.0 __ __ 21,199 _____ 6. ( 8 ) OTHERS (LIST INDIVIDUALLY ON BUDGET EXPLANATION PAGE) __ __ __ _____ _____ 7. (13 ) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1-6) __ __ __ 242,377 _____ B. OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS) 1. (___) POSTDOCTORAL ASSOCIATES __ __ __ _____ _____ 2. (___) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN, PROGRAMMER, ETC.) __ __ __ 563,498 _____ 3. (___) GRADUATE STUDENTS 118,123 _____ 4. (___) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS _____ _____ 5. (___) SECRETARIAL - CLERICAL (IF CHARGED DIRECTLY) 15,936 _____ 6. (___) OTHER _____ _____ TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A + B) 939,934 _____ C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS) 341,093 _____ TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A + B + C) 1,281,027 _____ D. EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING $5,000.) (see individual institution budget sheets) _____ _____ TOTAL EQUIPMENT 25,000 _____ E. TRAVEL 1. DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA, MEXICO AND U.S. POSSESSIONS) 38,800 _____ 2. FOREIGN _____ _____ F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT 1. STIPENDS $ _____ 2. TRAVEL _____ 3. SUBSISTENCE _____ 4. OTHER _____ TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS (_____) TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS _____ _____ G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS _____ _____ 1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 124,600 _____ 2. PUBLICATION/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION 8,450 _____ 3. CONSULTANT SERVICES 10,000 _____ 4. COMPUTER SERVICES 5,000 _____ 5. SUBAWARDS _____ _____ 6. OTHER _____ 303,343 _____ TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS 451,393 _____ H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G) 1,796,220 _____ I. INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) (SPECIFY RATE AND BASE) (see individual institution budget sheets) _____ TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) 1,102,134 _____ J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H + I) 2,898,354 _____ K. RESIDUAL FUNDS (IF FOR FURTHER SUPPORT OF CURRENT PROJECT SEE GPG II.D.7.j.) _____ _____ L. AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (J) OR (J MINUS K) $2,898,354 $_____ M. COST SHARING: PROPOSED LEVEL $_____ AGREED LEVEL IF DIFFERENT: $_____ PI/PD TYPED NAME AND SIGNATURE* DATE FOR ORION USE ONLY

INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATIONORG. REP. TYPED NAME & SIGNATURE* DATE Date Checked Date of Rate Sheet Initials-ORG _____ _____

OOI Form 1030 (10/99) Supersedes All Previous Editions *SIGNATURES REQUIRED ONLY FOR REVISED BUDGET (GPG III.C)

SUMMARY PROPOSAL BUDGET – Year 4 FOR ORION USE ONLY

ORGANIZATION Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Rutgers University, U. Mass. Boston, Columbia University, Yale University, U. Mass. Dartmouth

PROPOSAL NO. DURATION (MONTHS)

Proposed Granted PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR/PROJECT DIRECTOR Wayne R. Geyer, WHOI

AWARD NO.

A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD, Co-PIs, Faculty and Other Senior Associates Funded Funds Funds List each separately with name and title. (A.7. Show number in brackets) Person-months Requested By Granted

CAL ACAD SUMR Proposer (If Different) 1. W.R. Geyer, PI, WHOI 4.0 __ __ 48,993 $_____ 2. S. Lentz, Co-PI, WHOI 3.0 __ __ 33,060 _____ 3. J. Lerczak, Co-PI, WHOI 3.0 __ __ 19,015 _____ 4. L. Mullineaux, Co-PI, WHOI 4.0 __ __ 42,019 _____ 5. M. Charette, Co-PI, WHOI 3.0 __ __ 22,262 _____ 6. ( 8 ) OTHERS (LIST INDIVIDUALLY ON BUDGET EXPLANATION PAGE) __ __ __ _____ _____ 7. (13 ) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1-6) __ __ __ 253,226 _____ B. OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS) 1. (___) POSTDOCTORAL ASSOCIATES __ __ __ _____ _____ 2. (___) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN, PROGRAMMER, ETC.) __ __ __ 587,056 _____ 3. (___) GRADUATE STUDENTS 121,481 _____ 4. (___) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS _____ _____ 5. (___) SECRETARIAL - CLERICAL (IF CHARGED DIRECTLY) 16,732 _____ 6. (___) OTHER _____ _____ TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A + B) 978,495 _____ C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS) 356,041 _____ TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A + B + C) 1,334,536 _____ D. EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING $5,000.) _____ _____ TOTAL EQUIPMENT _____ E. TRAVEL 1. DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA, MEXICO AND U.S. POSSESSIONS) 38,800 _____ 2. FOREIGN _____ _____ F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT 1. STIPENDS $ _____ 2. TRAVEL _____ 3. SUBSISTENCE _____ 4. OTHER _____ TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS (_____) TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS _____ _____ G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS _____ _____ 1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 124,600 _____ 2. PUBLICATION/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION 9,450 _____ 3. CONSULTANT SERVICES 10,000 _____ 4. COMPUTER SERVICES 5,000 _____ 5. SUBAWARDS _____ _____ 6. OTHER _____ 304,328 _____ TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS 453,378 _____ H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G) 1,826,714 _____ I. INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) (SPECIFY RATE AND BASE) (see individual institution budget sheets) _____ TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) 1,148,501 _____ J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H + I) 2,975,215 _____ K. RESIDUAL FUNDS (IF FOR FURTHER SUPPORT OF CURRENT PROJECT SEE GPG II.D.7.j.) _____ _____ L. AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (J) OR (J MINUS K) $2,975,215 $_____ M. COST SHARING: PROPOSED LEVEL $_____ AGREED LEVEL IF DIFFERENT: $_____ PI/PD TYPED NAME AND SIGNATURE* DATE FOR ORION USE ONLY

INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATIONORG. REP. TYPED NAME & SIGNATURE* DATE Date Checked Date of Rate Sheet Initials-ORG _____ _____

OOI Form 1030 (10/99) Supersedes All Previous Editions *SIGNATURES REQUIRED ONLY FOR REVISED BUDGET (GPG III.C)

SUMMARY PROPOSAL BUDGET – Year 5 FOR ORION USE ONLY

ORGANIZATION Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Rutgers University, U. Mass. Boston, Columbia University, Yale University, U. Mass. Dartmouth

PROPOSAL NO. DURATION (MONTHS)

Proposed Granted PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR/PROJECT DIRECTOR Wayne R. Geyer, WHOI

AWARD NO.

A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD, Co-PIs, Faculty and Other Senior Associates Funded Funds Funds List each separately with name and title. (A.7. Show number in brackets) Person-months Requested By Granted

CAL ACAD SUMR Proposer (If Different) 1. W.R. Geyer, PI, WHOI 4.0 __ __ 51,443 $_____ 2. S. Lentz, Co-PI, WHOI 3.0 __ __ 34,711 _____ 3. J. Lerczak, Co-PI, WHOI 3.0 __ __ 19,968 _____ 4. L. Mullineaux, Co-PI, WHOI 4.0 __ __ 44,123 _____ 5. M. Charette, Co-PI, WHOI 3.0 __ __ 23,375 _____ 6. ( 8 ) OTHERS (LIST INDIVIDUALLY ON BUDGET EXPLANATION PAGE) __ __ __ _____ _____ 7. (13 ) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1-6) __ __ __ 264,610 _____ B. OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS) 1. (___) POSTDOCTORAL ASSOCIATES __ __ __ _____ _____ 2. (___) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN, PROGRAMMER, ETC.) __ __ __ 612,046 _____ 3. (___) GRADUATE STUDENTS 124,955 _____ 4. (___) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS _____ _____ 5. (___) SECRETARIAL - CLERICAL (IF CHARGED DIRECTLY) 17,569 _____ 6. (___) OTHER _____ _____ TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A + B) 1,019,180 _____ C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS) 371,704 _____ TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A + B + C) 1,390,884 _____ D. EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING $5,000.) _____ _____ TOTAL EQUIPMENT _____ E. TRAVEL 1. DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA, MEXICO AND U.S. POSSESSIONS) 38,800 _____ 2. FOREIGN _____ _____ F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT 1. STIPENDS $ _____ 2. TRAVEL _____ 3. SUBSISTENCE _____ 4. OTHER _____ TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS (_____) TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS _____ _____ G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS _____ _____ 1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 124,600 _____ 2. PUBLICATION/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION 9,950 _____ 3. CONSULTANT SERVICES 10,000 _____ 4. COMPUTER SERVICES 5,000 _____ 5. SUBAWARDS _____ _____ 6. OTHER _____ 235,361 _____ TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS 384,911 _____ H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G) 1,814,595 _____ I. INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) (SPECIFY RATE AND BASE) (see individual institution budget sheets) _____ TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) 1,196,560 _____ J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H + I) 3,011,155 _____ K. RESIDUAL FUNDS (IF FOR FURTHER SUPPORT OF CURRENT PROJECT SEE GPG II.D.7.j.) _____ _____ L. AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (J) OR (J MINUS K) $3,011,155 $_____ M. COST SHARING: PROPOSED LEVEL $_____ AGREED LEVEL IF DIFFERENT: $_____ PI/PD TYPED NAME AND SIGNATURE* DATE FOR ORION USE ONLY

INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATIONORG. REP. TYPED NAME & SIGNATURE* DATE Date Checked Date of Rate Sheet Initials-ORG _____ _____

OOI Form 1030 (10/99) Supersedes All Previous Editions *SIGNATURES REQUIRED ONLY FOR REVISED BUDGET (GPG III.C)

CUMULATIVE PROPOSAL BUDGET FOR ORION USE ONLY

ORGANIZATION Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Rutgers University, U. Mass. Boston, Columbia University, Yale University, U. Mass. Dartmouth

PROPOSAL NO. DURATION (MONTHS)

Proposed Granted PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR/PROJECT DIRECTOR _____

AWARD NO.

A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD, Co-PIs, Faculty and Other Senior Associates Funded Funds Funds List each separately with name and title. (A.7. Show number in brackets) Person-months Requested By Granted

CAL ACAD SUMR Proposer (If Different) 1. W.R. Geyer, PI, WHOI 20 __ __ 233,862 $_____ 2. S. Lentz, Co-PI, WHOI 15 __ __ 157,804 _____ 3. J. Lerczak, Co-PI, WHOI 15 __ __ 90,775 _____ 4. L. Mullineaux, Co-PI, WHOI 20 __ __ 200,575 _____ 5. M. Charette, Co-PI, WHOI 15 __ __ 106,258 _____ 6. ( 8 ) OTHERS (LIST INDIVIDUALLY ON BUDGET EXPLANATION PAGE) __ __ __ _____ _____ 7. ( 13 ) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1-6) __ __ __ 1,214,401 _____ B. OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS) 1. (___) POSTDOCTORAL ASSOCIATES __ __ __ _____ _____ 2. (___) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN, PROGRAMMER, ETC.) __ __ __ 2,884,085 _____ 3. (___) GRADUATE STUDENTS 590,018 _____ 4. (___) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS _____ _____ 5. (___) SECRETARIAL - CLERICAL (IF CHARGED DIRECTLY) 79,871 _____ 6. (___) OTHER _____ _____ TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A + B) 4,768,375 _____ C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS) 1,735,542 _____ TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A + B + C) 6,503,917 _____ D. EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING $5,000.) (see individual institution budget sheets) _____ _____ TOTAL EQUIPMENT 9,172,700 _____ E. TRAVEL 1. DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA, MEXICO AND U.S. POSSESSIONS) 194,000 _____ 2. FOREIGN _____ _____ F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT 1. STIPENDS $ _____ 2. TRAVEL _____ 3. SUBSISTENCE _____ 4. OTHER _____ TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS (_____) TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS _____ _____ G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS _____ _____ 1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 660,600 _____ 2. PUBLICATION/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION 36,550 _____ 3. CONSULTANT SERVICES 50,000 _____ 4. COMPUTER SERVICES 25,000 _____ 5. SUBAWARDS _____ _____ 6. OTHER _____ 1,389,201 _____ TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS 2,161,351 _____ H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G) 18,031,968 _____ I. INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) (SPECIFY RATE AND BASE) (see individual institution budget sheets) _____ TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) 5,621,163 _____ J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H + I) 23,653,131 _____ K. RESIDUAL FUNDS (IF FOR FURTHER SUPPORT OF CURRENT PROJECT SEE GPG II.D.7.j.) _____ _____ L. AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (J) OR (J MINUS K) $23,653,131 $_____ M. COST SHARING: PROPOSED LEVEL $_____ AGREED LEVEL IF DIFFERENT: $_____ PI/PD TYPED NAME AND SIGNATURE* DATE FOR ORION USE ONLY

INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATIONORG. REP. TYPED NAME & SIGNATURE* DATE Date Checked Date of Rate Sheet Initials-ORG _____ _____

OOI Form 1030 (10/99) Supersedes All Previous Editions *SIGNATURES REQUIRED ONLY FOR REVISED BUDGET (GPG III.C)

SUMMARY PROPOSAL BUDGET- YEAR 1

FOR ORION USE ONLY

ORGANIZATION Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution

PROPOSAL NO. DURATION (MONTHS)

Proposed Granted PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR/PROJECT DIRECTOR W.R. Geyer, Principal Investigator

AWARD NO.

A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD, Co-PIs, Faculty and Other Senior Associates Funded Funds Funds List each separately with name and title. (A.7. Show number in brackets) Person-months Requested By Granted

CAL ACAD SUMR Proposer (If Different) 1. W.R. Geyer, Principal Investigator 4.0 __ __ 42,323 2. S. Lentz, Co-Principal Investigator 3.0 __ __ 28,559 _____ 3. J. Lerczak, Co-Principal Investigator 3.0 __ __ 16,430 _____ 4. L. Mullineaux, Co-Principal Investigator 4.0 __ __ 36,298 _____ 5. M. Charette, Co-Principal Investigator 3.0 __ __ 19,230 _____ 6. B. Peucker-Ehrenbrink, Co-Principal Investigator 1.5 __ __ 11,124 _____ 7. ( 6 ) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1-6) 18.5 __ __ 153,964 _____ B. OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS) 1. (___) POSTDOCTORAL ASSOCIATES __ __ __ _____ _____ 2. ( 14 ) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN, PROGRAMMER, ETC.) 78.5 __ __ 394,429 _____ 3. ( 2 ) GRADUATE STUDENTS 52,422 _____ 4. (___) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS _____ _____ 5. ( 3 ) SECRETARIAL - CLERICAL (IF CHARGED DIRECTLY) 14,456 _____ 6. (___) OTHER _____ TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A + B) 615,271 _____ C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS) 259,924 _____ TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A + B + C) 875,195 _____ D. EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING $5,000.) 1. REMUS AUVs, 7 @ $340,000 ea. 4. MET buoys, 4 @ $120,000 ea. 7. Video plankton recorder, $57K 2. “Big” moorings, 14 @$140,000 ea. 5. ADCPs, 34 @ $$23,000 ea. 8. Profiling CTDs, 34 @ $50K 3. “Small” moorings, 20 @ $5,000 ea. 6. McLane samplers, 24 @ $34,000 ea. 9. DCCs, 3 @ $12,000 ea. TOTAL EQUIPMENT 8,311,000 _____ E. TRAVEL 1. DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA, MEXICO AND U.S. POSSESSIONS) 10,300 _____ 2. FOREIGN _____ _____ F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT 1. STIPENDS $ _____ 2. TRAVEL _____ 3. SUBSISTENCE _____ 4. OTHER _____ TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS (_____) TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS _____ _____ G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS _____ _____ 1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 100,000 _____ 2. PUBLICATION/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION 0 _____ 3. CONSULTANT SERVICES _____ 4. COMPUTER SERVICES _____ 5. SUBAWARDS _____ _____ 6. OTHER (tuition, ship time, ICP-MS facility use, communications) 145,057 _____ TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS 245,057 _____ H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G) 9,441,552 _____ I. INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) (SPECIFY RATE AND BASE) a. Laboratory Costs (Base: 822,773 @ 57.39% = $472,189) c. GRA Lab (Base: 52,422 @ 28.70% b. G&A Costs (Base: 875,195 @ 37.24% = $325,923) $15,045 TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) 813,157 _____ J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H + I) 10,254,709 _____ K. RESIDUAL FUNDS (IF FOR FURTHER SUPPORT OF CURRENT PROJECT SEE GPG II.D.7.j.) _____ _____ L. AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (J) OR (J MINUS K) $10,254,709 $_____ M. COST SHARING: PROPOSED LEVEL $_____ AGREED LEVEL IF DIFFERENT: $_____ PI/PD TYPED NAME AND SIGNATURE* DATE FOR ORION USE ONLY

INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATIONORG. REP. TYPED NAME & SIGNATURE* DATE Date Checked Date of Rate Sheet Initials-ORG _____ _____

OOI Form 1030 (10/99) Supersedes All Previous Editions *SIGNATURES REQUIRED ONLY FOR REVISED BUDGET (GPG III.C)

SUMMARY PROPOSAL BUDGET- YEAR 2

FOR ORION USE ONLY

ORGANIZATION Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution

PROPOSAL NO. DURATION (MONTHS)

Proposed Granted PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR/PROJECT DIRECTOR W.R. Geyer, Principal Investigator

AWARD NO.

A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD, Co-PIs, Faculty and Other Senior Associates Funded Funds Funds List each separately with name and title. (A.7. Show number in brackets) Person-months Requested By Granted

CAL ACAD SUMR Proposer (If Different) 1. W.R. Geyer, Principal Investigator 4.0 __ __ 44,439 2. S. Lentz, Co-Principal Investigator 3.0 __ __ 29,987 _____ 3. J. Lerczak, Co-Principal Investigator 3.0 __ __ 17,250 _____ 4. L. Mullineaux, Co-Principal Investigator 4.0 __ __ 38,116 _____ 5. M. Charette, Co-Principal Investigator 3.0 __ __ 20,192 _____ 6. B. Peucker-Ehrenbrink, Co-Principal Investigator 1.5 __ __ 11,678 _____ 7. ( 6 ) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1-6) 18.5 __ __ 161,662 _____ B. OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS) 1. (___) POSTDOCTORAL ASSOCIATES __ __ __ _____ _____ 2. ( 14 ) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN, PROGRAMMER, ETC.) 76.5 __ __ 397,537 _____ 3. ( 2 ) GRADUATE STUDENTS 54,538 _____ 4. (___) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS _____ _____ 5. ( 3 ) SECRETARIAL - CLERICAL (IF CHARGED DIRECTLY) 15,178 _____ 6. (___) OTHER _____ TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A + B) 628,915 _____ C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS) 265,247 _____ TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A + B + C) 894,162 _____ D. EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING $5,000.) TOTAL EQUIPMENT _____ E. TRAVEL 1. DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA, MEXICO AND U.S. POSSESSIONS) 10,300 _____ 2. FOREIGN _____ _____ F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT 1. STIPENDS $ _____ 2. TRAVEL _____ 3. SUBSISTENCE _____ 4. OTHER _____ TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS (_____) TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS _____ _____ G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS _____ _____ 1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 100,000 _____ 2. PUBLICATION/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION 0 _____ 3. CONSULTANT SERVICES _____ 4. COMPUTER SERVICES _____ 5. SUBAWARDS _____ _____ 6. OTHER (tuition, ship time, ICP-MS facility use, communications) 199,057 _____ TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS 299,057 _____ H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G) 1,203,519 _____ I. INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) (SPECIFY RATE AND BASE) a. Laboratory Costs (Base: 839,624 @ 57.39% = $481,860) c. GRA Lab (Base: 54,538 @ 28.70% b. G&A Costs (Base: 894,162 @ 37.24% = $332,986) $15,652 TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) 830,498 _____ J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H + I) 2,034,017 _____ K. RESIDUAL FUNDS (IF FOR FURTHER SUPPORT OF CURRENT PROJECT SEE GPG II.D.7.j.) _____ _____ L. AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (J) OR (J MINUS K) $2,034,017 $_____ M. COST SHARING: PROPOSED LEVEL $_____ AGREED LEVEL IF DIFFERENT: $_____ PI/PD TYPED NAME AND SIGNATURE* DATE FOR ORION USE ONLY

INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATIONORG. REP. TYPED NAME & SIGNATURE* DATE Date Checked Date of Rate Sheet Initials-ORG _____ _____

OOI Form 1030 (10/99) Supersedes All Previous Editions *SIGNATURES REQUIRED ONLY FOR REVISED BUDGET (GPG III.C)

SUMMARY PROPOSAL BUDGET- YEAR 3 FOR ORION USE ONLY

ORGANIZATION Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution

PROPOSAL NO. DURATION (MONTHS)

Proposed Granted PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR/PROJECT DIRECTOR W.R. Geyer, Principal Investigator

AWARD NO.

A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD, Co-PIs, Faculty and Other Senior Associates Funded Funds Funds List each separately with name and title. (A.7. Show number in brackets) Person-months Requested By Granted

CAL ACAD SUMR Proposer (If Different) 1. W.R. Geyer, Principal Investigator 4.0 __ __ 46,664 2. S. Lentz, Co-Principal Investigator 3.0 __ __ 31,487 _____ 3. J. Lerczak, Co-Principal Investigator 3.0 __ __ 18,112 _____ 4. L. Mullineaux, Co-Principal Investigator 4.0 __ __ 40,019 _____ 5. M. Charette, Co-Principal Investigator 3.0 __ __ 21,199 _____ 6. B. Peucker-Ehrenbrink, Co-Principal Investigator 1.5 __ __ 12,264 _____ 7. ( 6 ) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1-6) 18.5 __ __ 169,745 _____ B. OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS) 1. (___) POSTDOCTORAL ASSOCIATES __ __ __ _____ _____ 2. ( 14 ) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN, PROGRAMMER, ETC.) 73.5 __ __ 393,100 _____ 3. ( 2 ) GRADUATE STUDENTS 56,726 _____ 4. (___) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS _____ _____ 5. ( 3 ) SECRETARIAL - CLERICAL (IF CHARGED DIRECTLY) 15,936 _____ 6. (___) OTHER _____ TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A + B) 635,507 _____ C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS) 267,281 _____ TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A + B + C) 902,788 _____ D. EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING $5,000.) TOTAL EQUIPMENT _____ E. TRAVEL 1. DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA, MEXICO AND U.S. POSSESSIONS) 10,300 _____ 2. FOREIGN _____ _____ F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT 1. STIPENDS $ _____ 2. TRAVEL _____ 3. SUBSISTENCE _____ 4. OTHER _____ TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS (_____) TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS _____ _____ G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS _____ _____ 1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 100,000 _____ 2. PUBLICATION/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION 3,000 _____ 3. CONSULTANT SERVICES _____ 4. COMPUTER SERVICES _____ 5. SUBAWARDS _____ _____ 6. OTHER (tuition, ship time, ICP-MS facility use, communications) 199,057 _____ TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS 302,057 _____ H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G) 1,215,145 _____ I. INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) (SPECIFY RATE AND BASE) a. Laboratory Costs (Base: 846,062 @ 57.39% = $485,555) c. GRA Lab (Base: 56,726 @ 28.70% b. G&A Costs (Base: 902,788 @ 37.24% = $336,198) $16,280 TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) 838,033 _____ J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H + I) 2,053,178 _____ K. RESIDUAL FUNDS (IF FOR FURTHER SUPPORT OF CURRENT PROJECT SEE GPG II.D.7.j.) _____ _____ L. AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (J) OR (J MINUS K) $2,053,178 $_____ M. COST SHARING: PROPOSED LEVEL $_____ AGREED LEVEL IF DIFFERENT: $_____ PI/PD TYPED NAME AND SIGNATURE* DATE FOR ORION USE ONLY

INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATIONORG. REP. TYPED NAME & SIGNATURE* DATE Date Checked Date of Rate Sheet Initials-ORG _____ _____

OOI Form 1030 (10/99) Supersedes All Previous Editions *SIGNATURES REQUIRED ONLY FOR REVISED BUDGET (GPG III.C)

SUMMARY PROPOSAL BUDGET- YEAR 4 FOR ORION USE ONLY

ORGANIZATION Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution

PROPOSAL NO. DURATION (MONTHS)

Proposed Granted PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR/PROJECT DIRECTOR W.R. Geyer, Principal Investigator

AWARD NO.

A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD, Co-PIs, Faculty and Other Senior Associates Funded Funds Funds List each separately with name and title. (A.7. Show number in brackets) Person-months Requested By Granted

CAL ACAD SUMR Proposer (If Different) 1. W.R. Geyer, Principal Investigator 4.0 __ __ 48,993 2. S. Lentz, Co-Principal Investigator 3.0 __ __ 33,060 _____ 3. J. Lerczak, Co-Principal Investigator 3.0 __ __ 19,015 _____ 4. L. Mullineaux, Co-Principal Investigator 4.0 __ __ 42,019 _____ 5. M. Charette, Co-Principal Investigator 3.0 __ __ 22,262 _____ 6. B. Peucker-Ehrenbrink, Co-Principal Investigator 1.5 __ __ 12,877 _____ 7. ( 6 ) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1-6) 18.5 __ __ 178,226 _____ B. OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS) 1. (___) POSTDOCTORAL ASSOCIATES __ __ __ _____ _____ 2. ( 14 ) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN, PROGRAMMER, ETC.) 73.5 __ __ 412,759 _____ 3. ( 2 ) GRADUATE STUDENTS 58,988 _____ 4. (___) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS _____ _____ 5. ( 3 ) SECRETARIAL - CLERICAL (IF CHARGED DIRECTLY) 16,732 _____ 6. (___) OTHER _____ TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A + B) 666,705 _____ C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS) 280,644 _____ TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A + B + C) 947,349 _____ D. EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING $5,000.) TOTAL EQUIPMENT _____ E. TRAVEL 1. DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA, MEXICO AND U.S. POSSESSIONS) 10,300 _____ 2. FOREIGN _____ _____ F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT 1. STIPENDS $ _____ 2. TRAVEL _____ 3. SUBSISTENCE _____ 4. OTHER _____ TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS (_____) TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS _____ _____ G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS _____ _____ 1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 100,000 _____ 2. PUBLICATION/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION 4,000 _____ 3. CONSULTANT SERVICES _____ 4. COMPUTER SERVICES _____ 5. SUBAWARDS _____ _____ 6. OTHER (tuition, ship time, ICP-MS facility use, communications) 199,057 _____ TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS 303,057 _____ H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G) 1,260,706 _____ I. INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) (SPECIFY RATE AND BASE) a. Laboratory Costs (Base: 888,361 @ 57.39% = $509,830) c. GRA Lab (Base: 58,988 @ 28.70% b. G&A Costs (Base: 947,349 @ 37.24% = $352,793) $16,930 TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) 879,553 _____ J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H + I) 2,140,259 _____ K. RESIDUAL FUNDS (IF FOR FURTHER SUPPORT OF CURRENT PROJECT SEE GPG II.D.7.j.) _____ _____ L. AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (J) OR (J MINUS K) $2,140,259 $_____ M. COST SHARING: PROPOSED LEVEL $_____ AGREED LEVEL IF DIFFERENT: $_____ PI/PD TYPED NAME AND SIGNATURE* DATE FOR ORION USE ONLY

INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATIONORG. REP. TYPED NAME & SIGNATURE* DATE Date Checked Date of Rate Sheet Initials-ORG _____ _____

OOI Form 1030 (10/99) Supersedes All Previous Editions *SIGNATURES REQUIRED ONLY FOR REVISED BUDGET (GPG III.C)

SUMMARY PROPOSAL BUDGET- YEAR 5 FOR ORION USE ONLY

ORGANIZATION Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution

PROPOSAL NO. DURATION (MONTHS)

Proposed Granted PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR/PROJECT DIRECTOR W.R. Geyer, Principal Investigator

AWARD NO.

A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD, Co-PIs, Faculty and Other Senior Associates Funded Funds Funds List each separately with name and title. (A.7. Show number in brackets) Person-months Requested By Granted

CAL ACAD SUMR Proposer (If Different) 1. W.R. Geyer, Principal Investigator 4.0 __ __ 51,433 2. S. Lentz, Co-Principal Investigator 3.0 __ __ 34,711 _____ 3. J. Lerczak, Co-Principal Investigator 3.0 __ __ 19,968 _____ 4. L. Mullineaux, Co-Principal Investigator 4.0 __ __ 44,123 _____ 5. M. Charette, Co-Principal Investigator 3.0 __ __ 23,375 _____ 6. B. Peucker-Ehrenbrink, Co-Principal Investigator 1.5 __ __ 13,520 _____ 7. ( 6 ) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1-6) 18.5 __ __ 187,140 _____ B. OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS) 1. (___) POSTDOCTORAL ASSOCIATES __ __ __ _____ _____ 2. ( 14 ) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN, PROGRAMMER, ETC.) 73.5 __ __ 433,379 _____ 3. ( 2 ) GRADUATE STUDENTS 61,322 _____ 4. (___) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS _____ _____ 5. ( 3 ) SECRETARIAL - CLERICAL (IF CHARGED DIRECTLY) 17,569 _____ 6. (___) OTHER _____ TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A + B) 699,410 _____ C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS) 294,669 _____ TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A + B + C) 994,079 _____ D. EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING $5,000.) TOTAL EQUIPMENT _____ E. TRAVEL 1. DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA, MEXICO AND U.S. POSSESSIONS) 10,300 _____ 2. FOREIGN _____ _____ F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT 1. STIPENDS $ _____ 2. TRAVEL _____ 3. SUBSISTENCE _____ 4. OTHER _____ TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS (_____) TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS _____ _____ G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS _____ _____ 1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 100,000 _____ 2. PUBLICATION/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION 4,500 _____ 3. CONSULTANT SERVICES _____ 4. COMPUTER SERVICES _____ 5. SUBAWARDS _____ _____ 6. OTHER (tuition, ship time, ICP-MS facility use, communications) 130,057 _____ TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS 234,557 _____ H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G) 1,238,936 _____ I. INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) (SPECIFY RATE AND BASE) a. Laboratory Costs (Base: 932,757 @ 57.39% = $535,309 ) c. GRA Lab (Base: 61,322 @ 28.70% b. G&A Costs (Base: 994,079 @ 37.24% = $370,195) $17,599 TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) 923,103 _____ J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H + I) 2,162,039 _____ K. RESIDUAL FUNDS (IF FOR FURTHER SUPPORT OF CURRENT PROJECT SEE GPG II.D.7.j.) _____ _____ L. AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (J) OR (J MINUS K) $2,162,039 $_____ M. COST SHARING: PROPOSED LEVEL $_____ AGREED LEVEL IF DIFFERENT: $_____ PI/PD TYPED NAME AND SIGNATURE* DATE FOR ORION USE ONLY

INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATIONORG. REP. TYPED NAME & SIGNATURE* DATE Date Checked Date of Rate Sheet Initials-ORG _____ _____

OOI Form 1030 (10/99) Supersedes All Previous Editions *SIGNATURES REQUIRED ONLY FOR REVISED BUDGET (GPG III.C)

CUMULATIVE PROPOSAL BUDGET FOR ORION USE ONLY

ORGANIZATION Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution

PROPOSAL NO. DURATION (MONTHS)

Proposed Granted PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR/PROJECT DIRECTOR W.R. Geyer, Principal Investigator

AWARD NO.

A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD, Co-PIs, Faculty and Other Senior Associates Funded Funds Funds List each separately with name and title. (A.7. Show number in brackets) Person-months Requested By Granted

CAL ACAD SUMR Proposer (If Different) 1. W.R. Geyer, Principal Investigator 20 __ __ 233,862 2. S. Lentz, Co-Principal Investigator 15 __ __ 157,804 _____ 3. J. Lerczak, Co-Principal Investigator 15 __ __ 90,775 _____ 4. L. Mullineaux, Co-Principal Investigator 20 __ __ 200,575 _____ 5. M. Charette, Co-Principal Investigator 15 __ __ 106,258 _____ 6. B. Peucker-Ehrenbrink, Co-Principal Investigator 7.5 __ __ 61,463 _____ 7. ( 6 ) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1-6) 92.5 __ __ 850,737 _____ B. OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS) 1. (___) POSTDOCTORAL ASSOCIATES __ __ __ _____ _____ 2. ( 14 ) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN, PROGRAMMER, ETC.) __ __ 2,031,204 _____ 3. ( 2 ) GRADUATE STUDENTS 283,996 _____ 4. (___) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS _____ _____ 5. ( 3 ) SECRETARIAL - CLERICAL (IF CHARGED DIRECTLY) 79,871 _____ 6. (___) OTHER _____ TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A + B) _____ C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS) 1,367,765 _____ TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A + B + C) 4,613,573 _____ D. EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING $5,000.) TOTAL EQUIPMENT 8,311,000 _____ E. TRAVEL 1. DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA, MEXICO AND U.S. POSSESSIONS) 51,500 _____ 2. FOREIGN _____ _____ F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT 1. STIPENDS $ _____ 2. TRAVEL _____ 3. SUBSISTENCE _____ 4. OTHER _____ TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS (_____) TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS _____ _____ G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS _____ _____ 1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 500,000 _____ 2. PUBLICATION/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION 11,500 _____ 3. CONSULTANT SERVICES _____ 4. COMPUTER SERVICES _____ 5. SUBAWARDS _____ _____ 6. OTHER (tuition, ship time, ICP-MS facility use, communications) 872,285 _____ TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS 1,383,785 _____ H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G) 14,359,858 _____ I. INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) (SPECIFY RATE AND BASE)

TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) 4,284,344 _____ J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H + I) 18,644,202 _____ K. RESIDUAL FUNDS (IF FOR FURTHER SUPPORT OF CURRENT PROJECT SEE GPG II.D.7.j.) _____ _____ L. AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (J) OR (J MINUS K) $18,644,202 $_____ M. COST SHARING: PROPOSED LEVEL $_____ AGREED LEVEL IF DIFFERENT: $_____ PI/PD TYPED NAME AND SIGNATURE* DATE FOR ORION USE ONLY

INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATIONORG. REP. TYPED NAME & SIGNATURE* DATE Date Checked Date of Rate Sheet Initials-ORG _____ _____

OOI Form 1030 (10/99) Supersedes All Previous Editions *SIGNATURES REQUIRED ONLY FOR REVISED BUDGET (GPG III.C)

SUMMARY PROPOSAL BUDGET- YEAR 1

FOR ORION USE ONLY

ORGANIZATION Rutgers

PROPOSAL NO. DURATION (MONTHS)

Proposed Granted PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR/PROJECT DIRECTOR Robert J Chant

AWARD NO.

A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD, Co-PIs, Faculty and Other Senior Associates Funded Funds Funds List each separately with name and title. (A.7. Show number in brackets) Person-months Requested By Granted

CAL ACAD SUMR Proposer (If Different) 1. Robert J Chant __ __ 2__ 15,111 2. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 3. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 4. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 5. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 6. (___) OTHERS (LIST INDIVIDUALLY ON BUDGET EXPLANATION PAGE) __ __ __ _____ _____ 7. (___) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1-6) __ __ __ _____ _____ B. OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS) 1. (___) POSTDOCTORAL ASSOCIATES __ __ __ _____ _____ 2. (4) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN, PROGRAMMER, ETC.) __ __ __ 85,000 _____ 3. (1) GRADUATE STUDENTS 30,000 _____ 4. (___) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS _____ _____ 5. (___) SECRETARIAL - CLERICAL (IF CHARGED DIRECTLY) _____ _____ 6. (___) OTHER _____ _____ TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A + B) _____ _____ C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS) (33%- excluding grad student and summer salary)

33,036 _____

TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A + B + C) _____ _____ D. EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING $5,000.) 3 25 MHz CODAR UNITS @ $125,000 apiece 375000 _____ _____ TOTAL EQUIPMENT _____ _____ E. TRAVEL 1. DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA, MEXICO AND U.S. POSSESSIONS) 10,000 _____ 2. FOREIGN _____ _____ F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT 1. STIPENDS $ _____ 2. TRAVEL _____ 3. SUBSISTENCE _____ 4. OTHER _____ TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS (_____) TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS _____ _____ G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS _____ _____ 1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES _____ _____ 2. PUBLICATION/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION 3,000 _____ 3. CONSULTANT SERVICES (Ocean Sat License 10,000 _____ 4. COMPUTER SERVICES 5,000 _____ 5. SUBAWARDS _____ _____ 6. OTHER Ship time 20k/year CODAR OPERATIONS 20k/year 40,000 _____ TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS _____ _____ H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G) 606,147 _____ I. INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) (SPECIFY RATE AND BASE) _____ _____ TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) 55% excluding ship-time, computer service, CODAR, Travel and pubs 100,731 _____ J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H + I) 706,878 _____ K. RESIDUAL FUNDS (IF FOR FURTHER SUPPORT OF CURRENT PROJECT SEE GPG II.D.7.j.) _____ _____ L. AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (J) OR (J MINUS K) $706,878 $_____ M. COST SHARING: PROPOSED LEVEL $_____ AGREED LEVEL IF DIFFERENT: $_____ PI/PD TYPED NAME AND SIGNATURE* DATE FOR ORION USE ONLY

INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATIONORG. REP. TYPED NAME & SIGNATURE* DATE Date Checked Date of Rate Sheet Initials-ORG _____ _____

OOI Form 1030 (10/99) Supersedes All Previous Editions *SIGNATURES REQUIRED ONLY FOR REVISED BUDGET (GPG III.C)

SUMMARY PROPOSAL BUDGET –YEAR 2 FOR ORION USE ONLY

ORGANIZATION Rutgers

PROPOSAL NO. DURATION (MONTHS)

Proposed Granted PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR/PROJECT DIRECTOR Robert J Chant

AWARD NO.

A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD, Co-PIs, Faculty and Other Senior Associates Funded Funds Funds List each separately with name and title. (A.7. Show number in brackets) Person-months Requested By Granted

CAL ACAD SUMR Proposer (If Different) 1. Robert J Chant __ __ 2__ 15,111 2. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 3. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 4. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 5. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 6. (___) OTHERS (LIST INDIVIDUALLY ON BUDGET EXPLANATION PAGE) __ __ __ _____ _____ 7. (___) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1-6) __ __ __ _____ _____ B. OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS) 1. (___) POSTDOCTORAL ASSOCIATES __ __ __ _____ _____ 2. (4) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN, PROGRAMMER, ETC.) __ __ __ 85,000 _____ 3. (1) GRADUATE STUDENTS 30,000 _____ 4. (___) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS _____ _____ 5. (___) SECRETARIAL - CLERICAL (IF CHARGED DIRECTLY) _____ _____ 6. (___) OTHER _____ _____ TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A + B) 130,111 _____ C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS) (33%- excluding grad student and summer salary)

33,036 _____

TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A + B + C) 163,147 _____ D. EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING $5,000.) _____ _____ TOTAL EQUIPMENT _____ _____ E. TRAVEL 1. DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA, MEXICO AND U.S. POSSESSIONS) 10,000 _____ 2. FOREIGN _____ _____ F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT 1. STIPENDS $ _____ 2. TRAVEL _____ 3. SUBSISTENCE _____ 4. OTHER _____ TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS (_____) TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS _____ _____ G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS _____ _____ 1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES _____ _____ 2. PUBLICATION/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION 3,000 _____ 3. CONSULTANT SERVICES (Ocean Sat License 10,000 _____ 4. COMPUTER SERVICES 5,000 _____ 5. SUBAWARDS _____ _____ 6. OTHER Ship time 20k/year CODAR OPERATIONS 20k/year 40,000 _____ TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS _____ _____ H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G) 231,147 _____ I. INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) (SPECIFY RATE AND BASE) _____ _____ TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) 55% excluding ship-time, computer service, CODAR operations, Travel and pubs 100,731 _____ J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H + I) 331,878 _____ K. RESIDUAL FUNDS (IF FOR FURTHER SUPPORT OF CURRENT PROJECT SEE GPG II.D.7.j.) _____ _____ L. AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (J) OR (J MINUS K) $331,879 $_____ M. COST SHARING: PROPOSED LEVEL $_____ AGREED LEVEL IF DIFFERENT: $_____ PI/PD TYPED NAME AND SIGNATURE* DATE FOR ORION USE ONLY

INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATIONORG. REP. TYPED NAME & SIGNATURE* DATE Date Checked Date of Rate Sheet Initials-ORG _____ _____

OOI Form 1030 (10/99) Supersedes All Previous Editions *SIGNATURES REQUIRED ONLY FOR REVISED BUDGET (GPG III.C)

SUMMARY PROPOSAL BUDGET –YEAR 3 FOR ORION USE ONLY

ORGANIZATION Rutgers

PROPOSAL NO. DURATION (MONTHS)

Proposed Granted PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR/PROJECT DIRECTOR Robert J Chant

AWARD NO.

A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD, Co-PIs, Faculty and Other Senior Associates Funded Funds Funds List each separately with name and title. (A.7. Show number in brackets) Person-months Requested By Granted

CAL ACAD SUMR Proposer (If Different) 1. Robert J Chant __ __ 2__ 15,111 2. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 3. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 4. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 5. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 6. (___) OTHERS (LIST INDIVIDUALLY ON BUDGET EXPLANATION PAGE) __ __ __ _____ _____ 7. (___) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1-6) __ __ __ _____ _____ B. OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS) 1. (___) POSTDOCTORAL ASSOCIATES __ __ __ _____ _____ 2. (4) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN, PROGRAMMER, ETC.) __ __ __ 85,000 _____ 3. (1) GRADUATE STUDENTS 30,000 _____ 4. (___) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS _____ _____ 5. (___) SECRETARIAL - CLERICAL (IF CHARGED DIRECTLY) _____ _____ 6. (___) OTHER _____ _____ TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A + B) _____ _____ C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS) (33%- excluding grad student and summer salary)

33,036 _____

TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A + B + C) _____ _____ D. EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING $5,000.) _____ _____ TOTAL EQUIPMENT _____ _____ E. TRAVEL 1. DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA, MEXICO AND U.S. POSSESSIONS) 10,000 _____ 2. FOREIGN _____ _____ F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT 1. STIPENDS $ _____ 2. TRAVEL _____ 3. SUBSISTENCE _____ 4. OTHER _____ TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS (_____) TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS _____ _____ G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS _____ _____ 1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES _____ _____ 2. PUBLICATION/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION 3,000 _____ 3. CONSULTANT SERVICES (Ocean Sat License 10,000 _____ 4. COMPUTER SERVICES 5,000 _____ 5. SUBAWARDS _____ _____ 6. OTHER Ship time 20k/year CODAR OPERATIONS 20k/year 40,000 _____ TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS _____ _____ H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G) 231,147 _____ I. INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) (SPECIFY RATE AND BASE) _____ _____ TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) 55% excluding ship-time, computer service, CODAR operations, Travel and pubs 100,731 _____ J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H + I) 331,878 _____ K. RESIDUAL FUNDS (IF FOR FURTHER SUPPORT OF CURRENT PROJECT SEE GPG II.D.7.j.) _____ _____ L. AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (J) OR (J MINUS K) $331,878 $_____ M. COST SHARING: PROPOSED LEVEL $_____ AGREED LEVEL IF DIFFERENT: $_____ PI/PD TYPED NAME AND SIGNATURE* DATE FOR ORION USE ONLY

INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATIONORG. REP. TYPED NAME & SIGNATURE* DATE Date Checked Date of Rate Sheet Initials-ORG _____ _____

OOI Form 1030 (10/99) Supersedes All Previous Editions *SIGNATURES REQUIRED ONLY FOR REVISED BUDGET (GPG III.C)

SUMMARY PROPOSAL BUDGET –YEAR 4 FOR ORION USE ONLY

ORGANIZATION Rutgers

PROPOSAL NO. DURATION (MONTHS)

Proposed Granted PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR/PROJECT DIRECTOR Robert J Chant

AWARD NO.

A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD, Co-PIs, Faculty and Other Senior Associates Funded Funds Funds List each separately with name and title. (A.7. Show number in brackets) Person-months Requested By Granted

CAL ACAD SUMR Proposer (If Different) 1. Robert J Chant __ __ 2__ 15,111 2. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 3. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 4. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 5. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 6. (___) OTHERS (LIST INDIVIDUALLY ON BUDGET EXPLANATION PAGE) __ __ __ _____ _____ 7. (___) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1-6) __ __ __ _____ _____ B. OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS) 1. (___) POSTDOCTORAL ASSOCIATES __ __ __ _____ _____ 2. (4) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN, PROGRAMMER, ETC.) __ __ __ 85,000 _____ 3. (1) GRADUATE STUDENTS 30,000 _____ 4. (___) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS _____ _____ 5. (___) SECRETARIAL - CLERICAL (IF CHARGED DIRECTLY) _____ _____ 6. (___) OTHER _____ _____ TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A + B) _____ _____ C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS) (33%- excluding grad student and summer salary)

33,036 _____

TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A + B + C) _____ _____ D. EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING $5,000.) _____ _____ TOTAL EQUIPMENT _____ _____ E. TRAVEL 1. DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA, MEXICO AND U.S. POSSESSIONS) 10,000 _____ 2. FOREIGN _____ _____ F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT 1. STIPENDS $ _____ 2. TRAVEL _____ 3. SUBSISTENCE _____ 4. OTHER _____ TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS (_____) TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS _____ _____ G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS _____ _____ 1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES _____ _____ 2. PUBLICATION/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION 3,000 _____ 3. CONSULTANT SERVICES (Ocean Sat License 10,000 _____ 4. COMPUTER SERVICES 5,000 _____ 5. SUBAWARDS _____ _____ 6. OTHER Ship time 20k/year CODAR OPERATIONS 20k/year 40,000 _____ TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS _____ _____ H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G) 231,147 _____ I. INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) (SPECIFY RATE AND BASE) _____ _____ TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) 55% excluding ship-time, computer service, CODAR operations, Travel and pubs 100,731 _____ J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H + I) 331,878 _____ K. RESIDUAL FUNDS (IF FOR FURTHER SUPPORT OF CURRENT PROJECT SEE GPG II.D.7.j.) _____ _____ L. AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (J) OR (J MINUS K) $331,878 $_____ M. COST SHARING: PROPOSED LEVEL $_____ AGREED LEVEL IF DIFFERENT: $_____ PI/PD TYPED NAME AND SIGNATURE* DATE FOR ORION USE ONLY

INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATIONORG. REP. TYPED NAME & SIGNATURE* DATE Date Checked Date of Rate Sheet Initials-ORG _____ _____

OOI Form 1030 (10/99) Supersedes All Previous Editions *SIGNATURES REQUIRED ONLY FOR REVISED BUDGET (GPG III.C)

SUMMARY PROPOSAL BUDGET YEAR 5 FOR ORION USE ONLY

ORGANIZATION Rutgers

PROPOSAL NO. DURATION (MONTHS)

Proposed Granted PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR/PROJECT DIRECTOR Robert J Chant

AWARD NO.

A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD, Co-PIs, Faculty and Other Senior Associates Funded Funds Funds List each separately with name and title. (A.7. Show number in brackets) Person-months Requested By Granted

CAL ACAD SUMR Proposer (If Different) 1. Robert J Chant __ __ 2__ 15,111 2. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 3. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 4. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 5. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 6. (___) OTHERS (LIST INDIVIDUALLY ON BUDGET EXPLANATION PAGE) __ __ __ _____ _____ 7. (___) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1-6) __ __ __ _____ _____ B. OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS) 1. (___) POSTDOCTORAL ASSOCIATES __ __ __ _____ _____ 2. (4) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN, PROGRAMMER, ETC.) __ __ __ 85,000 _____ 3. (1) GRADUATE STUDENTS 30,000 _____ 4. (___) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS _____ _____ 5. (___) SECRETARIAL - CLERICAL (IF CHARGED DIRECTLY) _____ _____ 6. (___) OTHER _____ _____ TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A + B) _____ _____ C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS) (33%- excluding grad student and summer salary)

33,036 _____

TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A + B + C) _____ _____ D. EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING $5,000.) _____ _____ TOTAL EQUIPMENT _____ _____ E. TRAVEL 1. DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA, MEXICO AND U.S. POSSESSIONS) 10,000 _____ 2. FOREIGN _____ _____ F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT 1. STIPENDS $ _____ 2. TRAVEL _____ 3. SUBSISTENCE _____ 4. OTHER _____ TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS (_____) TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS _____ _____ G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS _____ _____ 1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES _____ _____ 2. PUBLICATION/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION 3,000 _____ 3. CONSULTANT SERVICES (Ocean Sat License 10,000 _____ 4. COMPUTER SERVICES 5,000 _____ 5. SUBAWARDS _____ _____ 6. OTHER Ship time 20k/year CODAR OPERATIONS 20k/year 40,000 _____ TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS _____ _____ H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G) 231,147 _____ I. INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) (SPECIFY RATE AND BASE) _____ _____ TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) 55% excluding ship-time, computer service, CODAR operations, Travel and pubs 100,731 _____ J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H + I) 331,878 _____ K. RESIDUAL FUNDS (IF FOR FURTHER SUPPORT OF CURRENT PROJECT SEE GPG II.D.7.j.) _____ _____ L. AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (J) OR (J MINUS K) $331,878 $_____ M. COST SHARING: PROPOSED LEVEL $_____ AGREED LEVEL IF DIFFERENT: $_____ PI/PD TYPED NAME AND SIGNATURE* DATE FOR ORION USE ONLY

INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATIONORG. REP. TYPED NAME & SIGNATURE* DATE Date Checked Date of Rate Sheet Initials-ORG _____ _____

OOI Form 1030 (10/99) Supersedes All Previous Editions *SIGNATURES REQUIRED ONLY FOR REVISED BUDGET (GPG III.C)

CUMULATIVE PROPOSAL BUDGET FOR ORION USE ONLY

ORGANIZATION Rutgers

PROPOSAL NO. DURATION (MONTHS)

Proposed Granted PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR/PROJECT DIRECTOR Robert J Chant

AWARD NO.

A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD, Co-PIs, Faculty and Other Senior Associates Funded Funds Funds List each separately with name and title. (A.7. Show number in brackets) Person-months Requested By Granted

CAL ACAD SUMR Proposer (If Different) 1. Robert J Chant __ __ 10__ 75,555 2. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 3. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 4. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 5. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 6. (___) OTHERS (LIST INDIVIDUALLY ON BUDGET EXPLANATION PAGE) __ __ __ _____ _____ 7. (___) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1-6) __ __ __ _____ _____ B. OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS) 1. (___) POSTDOCTORAL ASSOCIATES __ __ __ _____ _____ 2. (4) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN, PROGRAMMER, ETC.) __ __ __ 425,000 _____ 3. (1) GRADUATE STUDENTS 150,000 _____ 4. (___) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS _____ _____ 5. (___) SECRETARIAL - CLERICAL (IF CHARGED DIRECTLY) _____ _____ 6. (___) OTHER _____ _____ TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A + B) _____ _____ C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS) (33%- excluding grad student and summer salary)

165,180 _____

TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A + B + C) 815,735 _____ D. EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING $5,000.) 3 25 mHz CODAR UNITS 375000 _____ _____ TOTAL EQUIPMENT _____ _____ E. TRAVEL 1. DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA, MEXICO AND U.S. POSSESSIONS) 50,000 _____ 2. FOREIGN _____ _____ F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT 1. STIPENDS $ _____ 2. TRAVEL _____ 3. SUBSISTENCE _____ 4. OTHER _____ TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS (_____) TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS _____ _____ G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS _____ _____ 1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES _____ _____ 2. PUBLICATION/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION 15,000 _____ 3. CONSULTANT SERVICES (Ocean Sat License 50,000 _____ 4. COMPUTER SERVICES 25,000 _____ 5. SUBAWARDS _____ _____ 6. OTHER Ship time 20k/year CODAR OPERATIONS 20k/year 200,000 _____ TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS _____ _____ H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G) 1,530,735 _____ I. INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) (SPECIFY RATE AND BASE) _____ _____ TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) 55% excluding ship-time, computer service, CODAR operations, Travel and pubs 503,655 _____ J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H + I) 2,034,390 _____ K. RESIDUAL FUNDS (IF FOR FURTHER SUPPORT OF CURRENT PROJECT SEE GPG II.D.7.j.) _____ _____ L. AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (J) OR (J MINUS K) $2,034,390 $_____ M. COST SHARING: PROPOSED LEVEL $_____ AGREED LEVEL IF DIFFERENT: $_____ PI/PD TYPED NAME AND SIGNATURE* DATE FOR ORION USE ONLY

INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATIONORG. REP. TYPED NAME & SIGNATURE* DATE Date Checked Date of Rate Sheet Initials-ORG _____ _____

OOI Form 1030 (10/99) Supersedes All Previous Editions *SIGNATURES REQUIRED ONLY FOR REVISED BUDGET (GPG III.C)

SUMMARY PROPOSAL BUDGET (Year 1)

FOR ORION USE ONLY

ORGANIZATION University of Massachusetts-Boston

PROPOSAL NO. DURATION (MONTHS)

Proposed Granted PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR/PROJECT DIRECTOR Robert F. Chen

AWARD NO.

A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD, Co-PIs, Faculty and Other Senior Associates Funded Funds Funds List each separately with name and title. (A.7. Show number in brackets) Person-months Requested By Granted

CAL ACAD SUMR Proposer (If Different) 1. Robert F. Chen __ __ 1 $9,500 $_____ 2. G. Bernard Gardner 2 __ __ 12,000 _____ 3. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 4. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 5. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 6. (___) OTHERS (LIST INDIVIDUALLY ON BUDGET EXPLANATION PAGE) __ __ __ _____ _____ 7. (___) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1-6) __ __ __ _____ _____ B. OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS) 1. (___) POSTDOCTORAL ASSOCIATES __ __ __ _____ _____ 2. (1) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN, PROGRAMMER, ETC.) 4 __ __ 20,000 _____ 3. (___) GRADUATE STUDENTS _____ _____ 4. (___) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS _____ _____ 5. (___) SECRETARIAL - CLERICAL (IF CHARGED DIRECTLY) _____ _____ 6. (___) OTHER _____ _____ TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A + B) 41,500 _____ C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS) 9,844 _____ TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A + B + C) 51,344 _____ D. EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING $5,000.) _____ _____ _____ TOTAL EQUIPMENT 0 _____ E. TRAVEL 1. DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA, MEXICO AND U.S. POSSESSIONS) 7,000 _____ 2. FOREIGN _____ _____ F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT 1. STIPENDS $ _____ 2. TRAVEL _____ 3. SUBSISTENCE _____ 4. OTHER _____ TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS (_____) TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS _____ _____ G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS _____ _____ 1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 8,000 _____ 2. PUBLICATION/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION 0 _____ 3. CONSULTANT SERVICES _____ _____ 4. COMPUTER SERVICES _____ _____ 5. SUBAWARDS _____ _____ 6. OTHER see Budget Justification 16,000 _____ TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS 24,000 _____ H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G) 82,344 _____ I. INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) (SPECIFY RATE AND BASE) 52.5% of MTDC _____ TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) 43,231 _____ J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H + I) 125,575 _____ K. RESIDUAL FUNDS (IF FOR FURTHER SUPPORT OF CURRENT PROJECT SEE GPG II.D.7.j.) _____ _____ L. AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (J) OR (J MINUS K) $125,575 $_____ M. COST SHARING: PROPOSED LEVEL $_____ AGREED LEVEL IF DIFFERENT: $_____ PI/PD TYPED NAME AND SIGNATURE* DATE FOR ORION USE ONLY

INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATIONORG. REP. TYPED NAME & SIGNATURE* DATE Date Checked Date of Rate Sheet Initials-ORG _____ _____

OOI Form 1030 (10/99) Supersedes All Previous Editions *SIGNATURES REQUIRED ONLY FOR REVISED BUDGET (GPG III.C)

SUMMARY PROPOSAL BUDGET (Year 2) FOR ORION USE ONLY

ORGANIZATION University of Massachusetts-Boston

PROPOSAL NO. DURATION (MONTHS)

Proposed Granted PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR/PROJECT DIRECTOR Robert F. Chen

AWARD NO.

A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD, Co-PIs, Faculty and Other Senior Associates Funded Funds Funds List each separately with name and title. (A.7. Show number in brackets) Person-months Requested By Granted

CAL ACAD SUMR Proposer (If Different) 1. Robert F. Chen __ __ 1 $9,975 $_____ 2. G. Bernard Gardner 2 __ __ 12,600 _____ 3. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 4. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 5. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 6. (___) OTHERS (LIST INDIVIDUALLY ON BUDGET EXPLANATION PAGE) __ __ __ _____ _____ 7. (___) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1-6) __ __ __ _____ _____ B. OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS) 1. (___) POSTDOCTORAL ASSOCIATES __ __ __ _____ _____ 2. (1) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN, PROGRAMMER, ETC.) 4 __ __ 21,000 _____ 3. (___) GRADUATE STUDENTS _____ _____ 4. (___) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS _____ _____ 5. (___) SECRETARIAL - CLERICAL (IF CHARGED DIRECTLY) _____ _____ 6. (___) OTHER _____ _____ TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A + B) 43,575 _____ C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS) 10,321 _____ TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A + B + C) 53,896 _____ D. EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING $5,000.) 200 m hairy-faired Tow Cable with fiber optics, teflon tube, 18 conductors _____ _____ TOTAL EQUIPMENT 28,000 _____ E. TRAVEL 1. DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA, MEXICO AND U.S. POSSESSIONS) 7,000 _____ 2. FOREIGN _____ _____ F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT 1. STIPENDS $ _____ 2. TRAVEL _____ 3. SUBSISTENCE _____ 4. OTHER _____ TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS (_____) TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS _____ _____ G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS _____ _____ 1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 8,000 _____ 2. PUBLICATION/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION 1000 _____ 3. CONSULTANT SERVICES _____ _____ 4. COMPUTER SERVICES _____ _____ 5. SUBAWARDS _____ _____ 6. OTHER see Budget Justification 16,000 _____ TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS 25,000 _____ H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G) 113,896 _____ I. INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) (SPECIFY RATE AND BASE) 52.5% of MTDC _____ TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) 45,096 _____ J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H + I) 158,992 _____ K. RESIDUAL FUNDS (IF FOR FURTHER SUPPORT OF CURRENT PROJECT SEE GPG II.D.7.j.) _____ _____ L. AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (J) OR (J MINUS K) $158,992 $_____ M. COST SHARING: PROPOSED LEVEL $_____ AGREED LEVEL IF DIFFERENT: $_____ PI/PD TYPED NAME AND SIGNATURE* DATE FOR ORION USE ONLY

INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATIONORG. REP. TYPED NAME & SIGNATURE* DATE Date Checked Date of Rate Sheet Initials-ORG _____ _____

OOI Form 1030 (10/99) Supersedes All Previous Editions *SIGNATURES REQUIRED ONLY FOR REVISED BUDGET (GPG III.C)

SUMMARY PROPOSAL BUDGET (Year 3) FOR ORION USE ONLY

ORGANIZATION University of Massachusetts-Boston

PROPOSAL NO. DURATION (MONTHS)

Proposed Granted PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR/PROJECT DIRECTOR Robert F. Chen

AWARD NO.

A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD, Co-PIs, Faculty and Other Senior Associates Funded Funds Funds List each separately with name and title. (A.7. Show number in brackets) Person-months Requested By Granted

CAL ACAD SUMR Proposer (If Different) 1. Robert F. Chen __ __ 1 $10,474 $_____ 2. G. Bernard Gardner 2 __ __ 13,230 _____ 3. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 4. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 5. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 6. (___) OTHERS (LIST INDIVIDUALLY ON BUDGET EXPLANATION PAGE) __ __ __ _____ _____ 7. (___) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1-6) __ __ __ _____ _____ B. OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS) 1. (___) POSTDOCTORAL ASSOCIATES __ __ __ _____ _____ 2. (1) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN, PROGRAMMER, ETC.) 4 __ __ 22,050 _____ 3. (___) GRADUATE STUDENTS _____ _____ 4. (___) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS _____ _____ 5. (___) SECRETARIAL - CLERICAL (IF CHARGED DIRECTLY) _____ _____ 6. (___) OTHER _____ _____ TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A + B) 45,754 _____ C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS) 10,822 _____ TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A + B + C) 56,576 _____ D. EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING $5,000.) _____ _____ TOTAL EQUIPMENT 0 _____ E. TRAVEL 1. DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA, MEXICO AND U.S. POSSESSIONS) 7,000 _____ 2. FOREIGN _____ _____ F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT 1. STIPENDS $ _____ 2. TRAVEL _____ 3. SUBSISTENCE _____ 4. OTHER _____ TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS (_____) TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS _____ _____ G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS _____ _____ 1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 8,000 _____ 2. PUBLICATION/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION 1000 _____ 3. CONSULTANT SERVICES _____ _____ 4. COMPUTER SERVICES _____ _____ 5. SUBAWARDS _____ _____ 6. OTHER see Budget Justification 16,000 _____ TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS 25,000 _____ H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G) 88,576 _____ I. INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) (SPECIFY RATE AND BASE) 52.5% of MTDC _____ TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) 46,502 _____ J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H + I) 135,078 _____ K. RESIDUAL FUNDS (IF FOR FURTHER SUPPORT OF CURRENT PROJECT SEE GPG II.D.7.j.) _____ _____ L. AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (J) OR (J MINUS K) $135,078 $_____ M. COST SHARING: PROPOSED LEVEL $_____ AGREED LEVEL IF DIFFERENT: $_____ PI/PD TYPED NAME AND SIGNATURE* DATE FOR ORION USE ONLY

INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATIONORG. REP. TYPED NAME & SIGNATURE* DATE Date Checked Date of Rate Sheet Initials-ORG _____ _____

OOI Form 1030 (10/99) Supersedes All Previous Editions *SIGNATURES REQUIRED ONLY FOR REVISED BUDGET (GPG III.C)

SUMMARY PROPOSAL BUDGET (Year 4) FOR ORION USE ONLY

ORGANIZATION University of Massachusetts-Boston

PROPOSAL NO. DURATION (MONTHS)

Proposed Granted PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR/PROJECT DIRECTOR Robert F. Chen

AWARD NO.

A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD, Co-PIs, Faculty and Other Senior Associates Funded Funds Funds List each separately with name and title. (A.7. Show number in brackets) Person-months Requested By Granted

CAL ACAD SUMR Proposer (If Different) 1. Robert F. Chen __ __ 1 $10,997 $_____ 2. G. Bernard Gardner 2 __ __ 13,892 _____ 3. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 4. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 5. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 6. (___) OTHERS (LIST INDIVIDUALLY ON BUDGET EXPLANATION PAGE) __ __ __ _____ _____ 7. (___) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1-6) __ __ __ _____ _____ B. OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS) 1. (___) POSTDOCTORAL ASSOCIATES __ __ __ _____ _____ 2. (1) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN, PROGRAMMER, ETC.) 4 __ __ 23,153 _____ 3. (___) GRADUATE STUDENTS _____ _____ 4. (___) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS _____ _____ 5. (___) SECRETARIAL - CLERICAL (IF CHARGED DIRECTLY) _____ _____ 6. (___) OTHER _____ _____ TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A + B) 48,041 _____ C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS) 11,348 _____ TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A + B + C) 59,389 _____ D. EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING $5,000.) _____ _____ TOTAL EQUIPMENT 0 _____ E. TRAVEL 1. DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA, MEXICO AND U.S. POSSESSIONS) 7,000 _____ 2. FOREIGN _____ _____ F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT 1. STIPENDS $ _____ 2. TRAVEL _____ 3. SUBSISTENCE _____ 4. OTHER _____ TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS (_____) TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS _____ _____ G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS _____ _____ 1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 8,000 _____ 2. PUBLICATION/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION 1000 _____ 3. CONSULTANT SERVICES _____ _____ 4. COMPUTER SERVICES _____ _____ 5. SUBAWARDS _____ _____ 6. OTHER see Budget Justification 16,000 _____ TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS 25,000 _____ H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G) 91,389 _____ I. INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) (SPECIFY RATE AND BASE) 52.5% of MTDC _____ TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) 47,979 _____ J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H + I) 139,368 _____ K. RESIDUAL FUNDS (IF FOR FURTHER SUPPORT OF CURRENT PROJECT SEE GPG II.D.7.j.) _____ _____ L. AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (J) OR (J MINUS K) $139,368 $_____ M. COST SHARING: PROPOSED LEVEL $_____ AGREED LEVEL IF DIFFERENT: $_____ PI/PD TYPED NAME AND SIGNATURE* DATE FOR ORION USE ONLY

INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATIONORG. REP. TYPED NAME & SIGNATURE* DATE Date Checked Date of Rate Sheet Initials-ORG _____ _____

OOI Form 1030 (10/99) Supersedes All Previous Editions *SIGNATURES REQUIRED ONLY FOR REVISED BUDGET (GPG III.C)

SUMMARY PROPOSAL BUDGET (Year 5) FOR ORION USE ONLY

ORGANIZATION University of Massachusetts-Boston

PROPOSAL NO. DURATION (MONTHS)

Proposed Granted PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR/PROJECT DIRECTOR Robert F. Chen

AWARD NO.

A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD, Co-PIs, Faculty and Other Senior Associates Funded Funds Funds List each separately with name and title. (A.7. Show number in brackets) Person-months Requested By Granted

CAL ACAD SUMR Proposer (If Different) 1. Robert F. Chen __ __ 1 $11,547 $_____ 2. G. Bernard Gardner 2 __ __ 14,586 _____ 3. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 4. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 5. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 6. (___) OTHERS (LIST INDIVIDUALLY ON BUDGET EXPLANATION PAGE) __ __ __ _____ _____ 7. (___) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1-6) __ __ __ _____ _____ B. OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS) 1. (___) POSTDOCTORAL ASSOCIATES __ __ __ _____ _____ 2. (1) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN, PROGRAMMER, ETC.) 4 __ __ 24,310 _____ 3. (___) GRADUATE STUDENTS _____ _____ 4. (___) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS _____ _____ 5. (___) SECRETARIAL - CLERICAL (IF CHARGED DIRECTLY) _____ _____ 6. (___) OTHER _____ _____ TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A + B) 50,444 _____ C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS) 11,900 _____ TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A + B + C) 62,343 _____ D. EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING $5,000.) _____ _____ TOTAL EQUIPMENT 0 _____ E. TRAVEL 1. DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA, MEXICO AND U.S. POSSESSIONS) 7,000 _____ 2. FOREIGN _____ _____ F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT 1. STIPENDS $ _____ 2. TRAVEL _____ 3. SUBSISTENCE _____ 4. OTHER _____ TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS (_____) TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS _____ _____ G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS _____ _____ 1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 8,000 _____ 2. PUBLICATION/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION 1000 _____ 3. CONSULTANT SERVICES _____ _____ 4. COMPUTER SERVICES _____ _____ 5. SUBAWARDS _____ _____ 6. OTHER see Budget Justification 16,000 _____ TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS 25,000 _____ H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G) 94,343 _____ I. INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) (SPECIFY RATE AND BASE) 52.5% of MTDC _____ TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) 49,530 _____ J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H + I) 143,873 _____ K. RESIDUAL FUNDS (IF FOR FURTHER SUPPORT OF CURRENT PROJECT SEE GPG II.D.7.j.) _____ _____ L. AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (J) OR (J MINUS K) $143,873 $_____ M. COST SHARING: PROPOSED LEVEL $_____ AGREED LEVEL IF DIFFERENT: $_____ PI/PD TYPED NAME AND SIGNATURE* DATE FOR ORION USE ONLY

INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATIONORG. REP. TYPED NAME & SIGNATURE* DATE Date Checked Date of Rate Sheet Initials-ORG _____ _____

OOI Form 1030 (10/99) Supersedes All Previous Editions *SIGNATURES REQUIRED ONLY FOR REVISED BUDGET (GPG III.C)

SUMMARY PROPOSAL BUDGET (Cumulative) FOR ORION USE ONLY

ORGANIZATION University of Massachusetts-Boston

PROPOSAL NO. DURATION (MONTHS)

Proposed Granted PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR/PROJECT DIRECTOR Robert F. Chen

AWARD NO.

A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD, Co-PIs, Faculty and Other Senior Associates Funded Funds Funds List each separately with name and title. (A.7. Show number in brackets) Person-months Requested By Granted

CAL ACAD SUMR Proposer (If Different) 1. Robert F. Chen __ __ 5 52,493 $_____ 2. G. Bernard Gardner 10 __ __ 66,308 _____ 3. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 4. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 5. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 6. (___) OTHERS (LIST INDIVIDUALLY ON BUDGET EXPLANATION PAGE) __ __ __ _____ _____ 7. (___) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1-6) __ __ __ _____ _____ B. OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS) 1. (___) POSTDOCTORAL ASSOCIATES __ __ __ _____ _____ 2. (1) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN, PROGRAMMER, ETC.) 20 __ __ 110,513 _____ 3. (___) GRADUATE STUDENTS _____ _____ 4. (___) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS _____ _____ 5. (___) SECRETARIAL - CLERICAL (IF CHARGED DIRECTLY) _____ _____ 6. (___) OTHER _____ _____ TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A + B) 229,314 _____ C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS) 54,235 _____ TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A + B + C) 283,548 _____ D. EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING $5,000.) 200 m hairy-faired Tow Cable with fiber optics, teflon tube, 18 conductors _____ _____ TOTAL EQUIPMENT 28,000 _____ E. TRAVEL 1. DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA, MEXICO AND U.S. POSSESSIONS) 35,000 _____ 2. FOREIGN _____ _____ F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT 1. STIPENDS $ _____ 2. TRAVEL _____ 3. SUBSISTENCE _____ 4. OTHER _____ TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS (_____) TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS _____ _____ G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS _____ _____ 1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 40,000 _____ 2. PUBLICATION/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION 4,000 _____ 3. CONSULTANT SERVICES _____ _____ 4. COMPUTER SERVICES _____ _____ 5. SUBAWARDS _____ _____ 6. OTHER see Budget Justification 80,000 _____ TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS 124,000 _____ H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G) 470,548 _____ I. INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) (SPECIFY RATE AND BASE) 52.5% of MTDC _____ TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) 232,338 _____ J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H + I) 702,886 _____ K. RESIDUAL FUNDS (IF FOR FURTHER SUPPORT OF CURRENT PROJECT SEE GPG II.D.7.j.) _____ _____ L. AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (J) OR (J MINUS K) $702,886 $_____ M. COST SHARING: PROPOSED LEVEL $_____ AGREED LEVEL IF DIFFERENT: $_____ PI/PD TYPED NAME AND SIGNATURE* DATE FOR ORION USE ONLY

INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATIONORG. REP. TYPED NAME & SIGNATURE* DATE Date Checked Date of Rate Sheet Initials-ORG _____ _____

OOI Form 1030 (10/99) Supersedes All Previous Editions *SIGNATURES REQUIRED ONLY FOR REVISED BUDGET (GPG III.C)

SUMMARY PROPOSAL BUDGET- YEAR 1

FOR ORION USE ONLY

ORGANIZATION Columbia University – Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory

PROPOSAL NO. DURATION (MONTHS)

Proposed Granted PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR/PROJECT DIRECTOR Wade R. McGillis

AWARD NO.

A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD, Co-PIs, Faculty and Other Senior Associates Funded Funds Funds List each separately with name and title. (A.7. Show number in brackets) Person-months Requested By Granted

CAL ACAD SUMR Proposer (If Different) 1. Wade R. McGillis, Principal Investigator 1.0 __ __ 10,150 2. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 3. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 4. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 5. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 6. (___) OTHERS (LIST INDIVIDUALLY ON BUDGET EXPLANATION PAGE) __ __ __ _____ _____ 7. ( 1 ) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1-6) 1.0 __ __ 10,150 _____ B. OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS) 1. (___) POSTDOCTORAL ASSOCIATES __ __ __ _____ _____ 2. ( 3 ) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN, PROGRAMMER, ETC.) __ __ __ 35,029 _____ 3. ( 1 ) GRADUATE STUDENTS 24,560 _____ 4. (___) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS _____ _____ 5. (___) SECRETARIAL - CLERICAL (IF CHARGED DIRECTLY) _____ _____ 6. (___) OTHER _____ _____ TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A + B) 69,739 _____ C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS) 9,247 _____ TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A + B + C) 78,986 _____ D. EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING $5,000.) 1. NDIR 840 2. NDIR 7000 3. Met/Flux Packages TOTAL EQUIPMENT 89,350 _____ E. TRAVEL 1. DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA, MEXICO AND U.S. POSSESSIONS) 5,000 _____ 2. FOREIGN _____ _____ F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT 1. STIPENDS $ _____ 2. TRAVEL _____ 3. SUBSISTENCE _____ 4. OTHER _____ TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS (_____) TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS _____ _____ G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS _____ _____ 1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 30,200 _____ 2. PUBLICATION/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION 0 _____ 3. CONSULTANT SERVICES _____ 4. COMPUTER SERVICES _____ 5. SUBAWARDS _____ _____ 6. OTHER (tuition, shipping, telephone, ship time) 23,606 _____ TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS 53,806 _____ H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G) 227,142 _____ I. INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) (SPECIFY RATE AND BASE) _____ _____ TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) 51% MTDC excluding tuition and equipment 61,167 _____ J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H + I) 288,309 _____ K. RESIDUAL FUNDS (IF FOR FURTHER SUPPORT OF CURRENT PROJECT SEE GPG II.D.7.j.) _____ _____ L. AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (J) OR (J MINUS K) $288,309 $_____ M. COST SHARING: PROPOSED LEVEL $_____ AGREED LEVEL IF DIFFERENT: $_____ PI/PD TYPED NAME AND SIGNATURE* DATE FOR ORION USE ONLY

INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATIONORG. REP. TYPED NAME & SIGNATURE* DATE Date Checked Date of Rate Sheet Initials-ORG _____ _____

OOI Form 1030 (10/99) Supersedes All Previous Editions *SIGNATURES REQUIRED ONLY FOR REVISED BUDGET (GPG III.C)

SUMMARY PROPOSAL BUDGET –YEAR 2 FOR ORION USE ONLY

ORGANIZATION Columbia University – Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory

PROPOSAL NO. DURATION (MONTHS)

Proposed Granted PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR/PROJECT DIRECTOR Wade R. McGillis

AWARD NO.

A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD, Co-PIs, Faculty and Other Senior Associates Funded Funds Funds List each separately with name and title. (A.7. Show number in brackets) Person-months Requested By Granted

CAL ACAD SUMR Proposer (If Different) 1. Wade R. McGillis, Principal Investigator 1.0 __ __ 10,658 2. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 3. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 4. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 5. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 6. ( ) OTHERS (LIST INDIVIDUALLY ON BUDGET EXPLANATION PAGE) __ __ __ _____ _____ 7. ( 1 ) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1-6) 1.0 __ __ 10,658 _____ B. OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS) 1. (___) POSTDOCTORAL ASSOCIATES __ __ __ _____ _____ 2. ( 3 ) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN, PROGRAMMER, ETC.) __ __ __ 36,781 _____ 3. (1) GRADUATE STUDENTS 25,939 _____ 4. (___) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS _____ _____ 5. (___) SECRETARIAL - CLERICAL (IF CHARGED DIRECTLY) _____ _____ 6. (___) OTHER _____ _____ TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A + B) 73,378 _____ C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS) 9,710 _____ TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A + B + C) _____ _____ D. EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING $5,000.) 1. NDIR 840 2. NDIR 7000 3. Met/Flux Package TOTAL EQUIPMENT 89,350 _____ E. TRAVEL 1. DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA, MEXICO AND U.S. POSSESSIONS) 5,000 _____ 2. FOREIGN _____ _____ F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT 1. STIPENDS $ _____ 2. TRAVEL _____ 3. SUBSISTENCE _____ 4. OTHER _____ TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS (_____) TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS _____ _____ G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS _____ _____ 1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 8,600 _____ 2. PUBLICATION/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION 1,200 _____ 3. CONSULTANT SERVICES _____ 4. COMPUTER SERVICES _____ 5. SUBAWARDS _____ _____ 6. OTHER (tuition, shipping, telephone, ship time) 26,249 _____ TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS _____ _____ H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G) 213,487 _____ I. INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) (SPECIFY RATE AND BASE) _____ _____ TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) 51% MTDC excluding tuition and equipment 53,748 _____ J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H + I) 267,235 _____ K. RESIDUAL FUNDS (IF FOR FURTHER SUPPORT OF CURRENT PROJECT SEE GPG II.D.7.j.) _____ _____ L. AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (J) OR (J MINUS K) $267,235 $_____ M. COST SHARING: PROPOSED LEVEL $_____ AGREED LEVEL IF DIFFERENT: $_____ PI/PD TYPED NAME AND SIGNATURE* DATE FOR ORION USE ONLY

INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATIONORG. REP. TYPED NAME & SIGNATURE* DATE Date Checked Date of Rate Sheet Initials-ORG _____ _____

OOI Form 1030 (10/99) Supersedes All Previous Editions *SIGNATURES REQUIRED ONLY FOR REVISED BUDGET (GPG III.C)

SUMMARY PROPOSAL BUDGET –YEAR 3 FOR ORION USE ONLY

ORGANIZATION Columbia University – Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory

PROPOSAL NO. DURATION (MONTHS)

Proposed Granted PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR/PROJECT DIRECTOR Wade R. McGillis

AWARD NO.

A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD, Co-PIs, Faculty and Other Senior Associates Funded Funds Funds List each separately with name and title. (A.7. Show number in brackets) Person-months Requested By Granted

CAL ACAD SUMR Proposer (If Different) 1. Wade R. McGillis, Principal Investigator 1.0 __ __ 11,190 2. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 3. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 4. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 5. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 6. (___) OTHERS (LIST INDIVIDUALLY ON BUDGET EXPLANATION PAGE) __ __ __ _____ _____ 7. ( 1 ) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1-6) 1.0 __ __ 11,190 _____ B. OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS) 1. (___) POSTDOCTORAL ASSOCIATES __ __ __ _____ _____ 2. ( 3 ) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN, PROGRAMMER, ETC.) __ __ __ 38,619 _____ 3. (1) GRADUATE STUDENTS 27,397 _____ 4. (___) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS _____ _____ 5. (___) SECRETARIAL - CLERICAL (IF CHARGED DIRECTLY) _____ _____ 6. (___) OTHER _____ _____ TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A + B) 77,206 _____ C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS) 10,195 _____ TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A + B + C) 87,401 _____ D. EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING $5,000.) _____ _____ TOTAL EQUIPMENT _____ _____ E. TRAVEL 1. DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA, MEXICO AND U.S. POSSESSIONS) 5,000 _____ 2. FOREIGN _____ _____ F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT 1. STIPENDS $ _____ 2. TRAVEL _____ 3. SUBSISTENCE _____ 4. OTHER _____ TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS (_____) TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS _____ _____ G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS _____ _____ 1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 5,600 _____ 2. PUBLICATION/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION 1,200 _____ 3. CONSULTANT SERVICES _____ 4. COMPUTER SERVICES _____ 5. SUBAWARDS _____ _____ 6. OTHER 28,186 _____ TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS _____ _____ H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G) 127,387 _____ I. INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) (SPECIFY RATE AND BASE) _____ _____ TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) 51% MTDC excluding tuition and equipment 54,928 _____ J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H + I) 182,315 _____ K. RESIDUAL FUNDS (IF FOR FURTHER SUPPORT OF CURRENT PROJECT SEE GPG II.D.7.j.) _____ _____ L. AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (J) OR (J MINUS K) $182,315 $_____ M. COST SHARING: PROPOSED LEVEL $_____ AGREED LEVEL IF DIFFERENT: $_____ PI/PD TYPED NAME AND SIGNATURE* DATE FOR ORION USE ONLY

INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATIONORG. REP. TYPED NAME & SIGNATURE* DATE Date Checked Date of Rate Sheet Initials-ORG _____ _____

OOI Form 1030 (10/99) Supersedes All Previous Editions *SIGNATURES REQUIRED ONLY FOR REVISED BUDGET (GPG III.C)

SUMMARY PROPOSAL BUDGET –YEAR 4 FOR ORION USE ONLY

ORGANIZATION Columbia University – Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory

PROPOSAL NO. DURATION (MONTHS)

Proposed Granted PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR/PROJECT DIRECTOR Wade R. McGillis

AWARD NO.

A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD, Co-PIs, Faculty and Other Senior Associates Funded Funds Funds List each separately with name and title. (A.7. Show number in brackets) Person-months Requested By Granted

CAL ACAD SUMR Proposer (If Different) 1. Wade R. McGillis, Principal Investigator 1.0 __ __ 11,750 2. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 3. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 4. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 5. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 6. (___) OTHERS (LIST INDIVIDUALLY ON BUDGET EXPLANATION PAGE) __ __ __ _____ _____ 7. ( 1 ) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1-6) 1.0 __ __ 11,750 _____ B. OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS) 1. (___) POSTDOCTORAL ASSOCIATES __ __ __ _____ _____ 2. ( 3 ) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN, PROGRAMMER, ETC.) __ __ __ 40,550 _____ 3. (1) GRADUATE STUDENTS 28,493 _____ 4. (___) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS _____ _____ 5. (___) SECRETARIAL - CLERICAL (IF CHARGED DIRECTLY) _____ _____ 6. (___) OTHER _____ _____ TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A + B) 80,793 _____ C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS) 10,706 _____ TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A + B + C) _____ _____ D. EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING $5,000.) _____ _____ TOTAL EQUIPMENT _____ _____ E. TRAVEL 1. DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA, MEXICO AND U.S. POSSESSIONS) 5,000 _____ 2. FOREIGN _____ _____ F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT 1. STIPENDS $ _____ 2. TRAVEL _____ 3. SUBSISTENCE _____ 4. OTHER _____ TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS (_____) TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS _____ _____ G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS _____ _____ 1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 5,600 _____ 2. PUBLICATION/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION 1,200 _____ 3. CONSULTANT SERVICES _____ 4. COMPUTER SERVICES _____ 5. SUBAWARDS _____ _____ 6. OTHER 29,171 _____ TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS _____ _____ H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G) 132,470 _____ I. INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) (SPECIFY RATE AND BASE) _____ _____ TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) 51% MTDC excluding tuition and equipment 57,017 _____ J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H + I) 189,487 _____ K. RESIDUAL FUNDS (IF FOR FURTHER SUPPORT OF CURRENT PROJECT SEE GPG II.D.7.j.) _____ _____ L. AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (J) OR (J MINUS K) $189,487 $_____ M. COST SHARING: PROPOSED LEVEL $_____ AGREED LEVEL IF DIFFERENT: $_____ PI/PD TYPED NAME AND SIGNATURE* DATE FOR ORION USE ONLY

INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATIONORG. REP. TYPED NAME & SIGNATURE* DATE Date Checked Date of Rate Sheet Initials-ORG _____ _____

OOI Form 1030 (10/99) Supersedes All Previous Editions *SIGNATURES REQUIRED ONLY FOR REVISED BUDGET (GPG III.C)

SUMMARY PROPOSAL BUDGET YEAR 5 FOR ORION USE ONLY

ORGANIZATION Columbia University – Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory

PROPOSAL NO. DURATION (MONTHS)

Proposed Granted PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR/PROJECT DIRECTOR Wade R. McGillis

AWARD NO.

A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD, Co-PIs, Faculty and Other Senior Associates Funded Funds Funds List each separately with name and title. (A.7. Show number in brackets) Person-months Requested By Granted

CAL ACAD SUMR Proposer (If Different) 1. Wade R. McGillis, Principal Investigator 1.0 __ __ 12,337 2. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 3. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 4. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 5. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 6. (___) OTHERS (LIST INDIVIDUALLY ON BUDGET EXPLANATION PAGE) __ __ __ _____ _____ 7. ( 1 ) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1-6) 1.0 __ __ 12,337 _____ B. OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS) 1. (___) POSTDOCTORAL ASSOCIATES __ __ __ _____ _____ 2. ( 3 ) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN, PROGRAMMER, ETC.) __ __ __ 42,577 _____ 3. (1) GRADUATE STUDENTS 29,633 _____ 4. (___) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS _____ _____ 5. (___) SECRETARIAL - CLERICAL (IF CHARGED DIRECTLY) _____ _____ 6. (___) OTHER _____ _____ TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A + B) 84,547 _____ C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS) 11,240 _____ TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A + B + C) _____ _____ D. EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING $5,000.) _____ _____ TOTAL EQUIPMENT _____ _____ E. TRAVEL 1. DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA, MEXICO AND U.S. POSSESSIONS) 5,000 _____ 2. FOREIGN _____ _____ F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT 1. STIPENDS $ _____ 2. TRAVEL _____ 3. SUBSISTENCE _____ 4. OTHER _____ TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS (_____) TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS _____ _____ G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS _____ _____ 1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 5,600 _____ 2. PUBLICATION/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION 1,200 _____ 3. CONSULTANT SERVICES _____ 4. COMPUTER SERVICES _____ 5. SUBAWARDS _____ _____ 6. OTHER 29,204 _____ TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS _____ _____ H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G) 136,791 _____ I. INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) (SPECIFY RATE AND BASE) _____ _____ TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) 51% MTDC excluding tuition and equipment 58,694 _____ J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H + I) 195,485 _____ K. RESIDUAL FUNDS (IF FOR FURTHER SUPPORT OF CURRENT PROJECT SEE GPG II.D.7.j.) _____ _____ L. AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (J) OR (J MINUS K) $195,485 $_____ M. COST SHARING: PROPOSED LEVEL $_____ AGREED LEVEL IF DIFFERENT: $_____ PI/PD TYPED NAME AND SIGNATURE* DATE FOR ORION USE ONLY

INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATIONORG. REP. TYPED NAME & SIGNATURE* DATE Date Checked Date of Rate Sheet Initials-ORG _____ _____

OOI Form 1030 (10/99) Supersedes All Previous Editions *SIGNATURES REQUIRED ONLY FOR REVISED BUDGET (GPG III.C)

CUMULATIVE PROPOSAL BUDGET FOR ORION USE ONLY

ORGANIZATION Columbia University – Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory

PROPOSAL NO. DURATION (MONTHS)

Proposed Granted PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR/PROJECT DIRECTOR Wade R. McGillis

AWARD NO.

A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD, Co-PIs, Faculty and Other Senior Associates Funded Funds Funds List each separately with name and title. (A.7. Show number in brackets) Person-months Requested By Granted

CAL ACAD SUMR Proposer (If Different) 1. Wade R. McGillis, Principal Investigator 5.0 __ __ 56,085 2. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 3. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 4. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 5. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 6. (___) OTHERS (LIST INDIVIDUALLY ON BUDGET EXPLANATION PAGE) __ __ __ _____ _____ 7. ( 1 ) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1-6) 5.0 __ __ 56,085 _____ B. OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS) 1. (___) POSTDOCTORAL ASSOCIATES __ __ __ _____ _____ 2. ( 3 ) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN, PROGRAMMER, ETC.) __ __ __ 193,556 _____ 3. (1) GRADUATE STUDENTS 136,022 _____ 4. (___) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS _____ _____ 5. (___) SECRETARIAL - CLERICAL (IF CHARGED DIRECTLY) _____ _____ 6. (___) OTHER _____ _____ TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A + B) 385,633 _____ C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS) 51,098 _____ TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A + B + C) _____ _____ D. EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING $5,000.) _____ _____ TOTAL EQUIPMENT 178,700 _____ E. TRAVEL 1. DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA, MEXICO AND U.S. POSSESSIONS) 25,000 _____ 2. FOREIGN _____ _____ F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT 1. STIPENDS $ _____ 2. TRAVEL _____ 3. SUBSISTENCE _____ 4. OTHER _____ TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS (_____) TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS _____ _____ G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS _____ _____ 1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 55,600 _____ 2. PUBLICATION/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION 4,800 _____ 3. CONSULTANT SERVICES _____ 4. COMPUTER SERVICES _____ 5. SUBAWARDS _____ _____ 6. OTHER 136,416 _____ TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS _____ _____ H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G) 837,277 _____ I. INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) (SPECIFY RATE AND BASE) _____ _____ TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) 51% MTDC excluding tuition and equipment 285,554 _____ J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H + I) 1,122,831 _____ K. RESIDUAL FUNDS (IF FOR FURTHER SUPPORT OF CURRENT PROJECT SEE GPG II.D.7.j.) _____ _____ L. AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (J) OR (J MINUS K) $1,122,831 $_____ M. COST SHARING: PROPOSED LEVEL $_____ AGREED LEVEL IF DIFFERENT: $_____ PI/PD TYPED NAME AND SIGNATURE* DATE FOR ORION USE ONLY

INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATIONORG. REP. TYPED NAME & SIGNATURE* DATE Date Checked Date of Rate Sheet Initials-ORG _____ _____

OOI Form 1030 (10/99) Supersedes All Previous Editions *SIGNATURES REQUIRED ONLY FOR REVISED BUDGET (GPG III.C)

ANNUAL PROPOSAL BUDGET - Year 1

FOR ORION USE ONLY

ORGANIZATION Yale School of Forestry and Env. Studies

PROPOSAL NO. DURATION (MONTHS)

Proposed Granted PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR/PROJECT DIRECTOR Peter A Raymond

AWARD NO.

A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD, Co-PIs, Faculty and Other Senior Associates Funded Funds Funds List each separately with name and title. (A.7. Show number in brackets) Person-months Requested By Granted

CAL ACAD SUMR Proposer (If Different) 1. Peter A Raymond __ __ 1 $7887 $_____ 2. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 3. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 4. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 5. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 6. (___) OTHERS (LIST INDIVIDUALLY ON BUDGET EXPLANATION PAGE) __ __ __ _____ _____ 7. (___) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1-6) __ __ __ _____ _____ B. OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS) 1. (___) POSTDOCTORAL ASSOCIATES __ __ __ _____ _____ 2. (1) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN, PROGRAMMER, ETC.) 6 __ __ 20000 _____ 3. (5) GRADUATE STUDENTS 4000 _____ 4. (___) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS _____ _____ 5. (___) SECRETARIAL - CLERICAL (IF CHARGED DIRECTLY) _____ _____ 6. (___) OTHER _____ _____ TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A + B) _____ _____ C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS) 8766 _____ TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A + B + C) 406653 _____ D. EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING $5,000.) 3 Shimadzu flow thru units 3 Quardipole mass spec units _____ TOTAL EQUIPMENT 135000 _____ E. TRAVEL 1. DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA, MEXICO AND U.S. POSSESSIONS) 3500 _____ 2. FOREIGN _____ _____ F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT 1. STIPENDS $ _____ 2. TRAVEL _____ 3. SUBSISTENCE _____ 4. OTHER _____ TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS (_____) TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS _____ _____ G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS _____ _____ 1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 18000 _____ 2. PUBLICATION/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION 250 _____ 3. CONSULTANT SERVICES _____ _____ 4. COMPUTER SERVICES _____ _____ 5. SUBAWARDS _____ _____ 6. OTHER _____ 19000 _____ TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS 37250 _____ H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G) 216403 _____ I. INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) (SPECIFY RATE AND BASE) 63.5% _____ TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) 51691 _____ J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H + I) _____ _____ K. RESIDUAL FUNDS (IF FOR FURTHER SUPPORT OF CURRENT PROJECT SEE GPG II.D.7.j.) _____ _____ L. AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (J) OR (J MINUS K) $268094 $_____ M. COST SHARING: PROPOSED LEVEL $_____ AGREED LEVEL IF DIFFERENT: $_____ PI/PD TYPED NAME AND SIGNATURE* DATE FOR ORION USE ONLY

INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATIONORG. REP. TYPED NAME & SIGNATURE* DATE Date Checked Date of Rate Sheet Initials-ORG _____ _____

OOI Form 1030 (10/99) Supersedes All Previous Editions *SIGNATURES REQUIRED ONLY FOR REVISED BUDGET (GPG III.C)

ANNUAL PROPOSAL BUDGET – Year 2 FOR ORION USE ONLY

ORGANIZATION Yale School of Forestry and Env. Studies

PROPOSAL NO. DURATION (MONTHS)

Proposed Granted PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR/PROJECT DIRECTOR Peter A Raymond

AWARD NO.

A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD, Co-PIs, Faculty and Other Senior Associates Funded Funds Funds List each separately with name and title. (A.7. Show number in brackets) Person-months Requested By Granted

CAL ACAD SUMR Proposer (If Different) 1. Peter A Raymond __ __ 1 $8202 $_____ 2. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 3. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 4. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 5. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 6. (___) OTHERS (LIST INDIVIDUALLY ON BUDGET EXPLANATION PAGE) __ __ __ _____ _____ 7. (___) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1-6) __ __ __ _____ _____ B. OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS) 1. (___) POSTDOCTORAL ASSOCIATES __ __ __ _____ _____ 2. (1) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN, PROGRAMMER, ETC.) 6 __ __ 20800 _____ 3. (5) GRADUATE STUDENTS 4000 _____ 4. (___) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS _____ _____ 5. (___) SECRETARIAL - CLERICAL (IF CHARGED DIRECTLY) _____ _____ 6. (___) OTHER _____ _____ TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A + B) _____ _____ C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS) 9101 _____ TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A + B + C) 42103 _____ D. EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING $5,000.) 3 Shimadzu flow thru units 3 Quardipole mass spec units _____ TOTAL EQUIPMENT _____ E. TRAVEL 1. DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA, MEXICO AND U.S. POSSESSIONS) 3500 _____ 2. FOREIGN _____ _____ F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT 1. STIPENDS $ _____ 2. TRAVEL _____ 3. SUBSISTENCE _____ 4. OTHER _____ TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS (_____) TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS _____ _____ G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS _____ _____ 1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 8000 _____ 2. PUBLICATION/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION 250 _____ 3. CONSULTANT SERVICES _____ _____ 4. COMPUTER SERVICES _____ _____ 5. SUBAWARDS _____ _____ 6. OTHER _____ 19000 _____ TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS 27250 _____ H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G) 72853 _____ I. INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) (SPECIFY RATE AND BASE) 63.5% _____ TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) 46262 _____ J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H + I) _____ _____ K. RESIDUAL FUNDS (IF FOR FURTHER SUPPORT OF CURRENT PROJECT SEE GPG II.D.7.j.) _____ _____ L. AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (J) OR (J MINUS K) $119115 $_____ M. COST SHARING: PROPOSED LEVEL $_____ AGREED LEVEL IF DIFFERENT: $_____ PI/PD TYPED NAME AND SIGNATURE* DATE FOR ORION USE ONLY

INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATIONORG. REP. TYPED NAME & SIGNATURE* DATE Date Checked Date of Rate Sheet Initials-ORG _____ _____

OOI Form 1030 (10/99) Supersedes All Previous Editions *SIGNATURES REQUIRED ONLY FOR REVISED BUDGET (GPG III.C)

ANNUAL PROPOSAL BUDGET – Year 3 FOR ORION USE ONLY

ORGANIZATION Yale School of Forestry and Env. Studies

PROPOSAL NO. DURATION (MONTHS)

Proposed Granted PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR/PROJECT DIRECTOR Peter A Raymond

AWARD NO.

A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD, Co-PIs, Faculty and Other Senior Associates Funded Funds Funds List each separately with name and title. (A.7. Show number in brackets) Person-months Requested By Granted

CAL ACAD SUMR Proposer (If Different) 1. Peter A Raymond __ __ 1 $8531 $_____ 2. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 3. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 4. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 5. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 6. (___) OTHERS (LIST INDIVIDUALLY ON BUDGET EXPLANATION PAGE) __ __ __ _____ _____ 7. (___) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1-6) __ __ __ _____ _____ B. OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS) 1. (___) POSTDOCTORAL ASSOCIATES __ __ __ _____ _____ 2. (1) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN, PROGRAMMER, ETC.) 6 __ __ 21632 _____ 3. (5) GRADUATE STUDENTS 4000 _____ 4. (___) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS _____ _____ 5. (___) SECRETARIAL - CLERICAL (IF CHARGED DIRECTLY) _____ _____ 6. (___) OTHER _____ _____ TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A + B) _____ _____ C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS) 10303 _____ TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A + B + C) 44465 _____ D. EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING $5,000.) 3 Shimadzu flow thru units 3 Quardipole mass spec units _____ TOTAL EQUIPMENT _____ E. TRAVEL 1. DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA, MEXICO AND U.S. POSSESSIONS) 3500 _____ 2. FOREIGN _____ _____ F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT 1. STIPENDS $ _____ 2. TRAVEL _____ 3. SUBSISTENCE _____ 4. OTHER _____ TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS (_____) TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS _____ _____ G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS _____ _____ 1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 8000 _____ 2. PUBLICATION/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION 250 _____ 3. CONSULTANT SERVICES _____ _____ 4. COMPUTER SERVICES _____ _____ 5. SUBAWARDS _____ _____ 6. OTHER _____ 19000 _____ TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS 27250 _____ H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G) 75215 _____ I. INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) (SPECIFY RATE AND BASE) 63.5% _____ TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) 47762 _____ J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H + I) _____ _____ K. RESIDUAL FUNDS (IF FOR FURTHER SUPPORT OF CURRENT PROJECT SEE GPG II.D.7.j.) _____ _____ L. AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (J) OR (J MINUS K) $122977 $_____ M. COST SHARING: PROPOSED LEVEL $_____ AGREED LEVEL IF DIFFERENT: $_____ PI/PD TYPED NAME AND SIGNATURE* DATE FOR ORION USE ONLY

INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATIONORG. REP. TYPED NAME & SIGNATURE* DATE Date Checked Date of Rate Sheet Initials-ORG _____ _____

OOI Form 1030 (10/99) Supersedes All Previous Editions *SIGNATURES REQUIRED ONLY FOR REVISED BUDGET (GPG III.C)

ANNUAL PROPOSAL BUDGET – Year 4 FOR ORION USE ONLY

ORGANIZATION Yale School of Forestry and Env. Studies

PROPOSAL NO. DURATION (MONTHS)

Proposed Granted PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR/PROJECT DIRECTOR Peter A Raymond

AWARD NO.

A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD, Co-PIs, Faculty and Other Senior Associates Funded Funds Funds List each separately with name and title. (A.7. Show number in brackets) Person-months Requested By Granted

CAL ACAD SUMR Proposer (If Different) 1. Peter A Raymond __ __ 1 $8872 $_____ 2. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 3. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 4. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 5. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 6. (___) OTHERS (LIST INDIVIDUALLY ON BUDGET EXPLANATION PAGE) __ __ __ _____ _____ 7. (___) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1-6) __ __ __ _____ _____ B. OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS) 1. (___) POSTDOCTORAL ASSOCIATES __ __ __ _____ _____ 2. (1) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN, PROGRAMMER, ETC.) 6 __ __ 22497 _____ 3. (5) GRADUATE STUDENTS 4000 _____ 4. (___) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS _____ _____ 5. (___) SECRETARIAL - CLERICAL (IF CHARGED DIRECTLY) _____ _____ 6. (___) OTHER _____ _____ TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A + B) _____ _____ C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS) 10696 _____ TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A + B + C) 46065 _____ D. EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING $5,000.) 3 Shimadzu flow thru units 3 Quardipole mass spec units _____ TOTAL EQUIPMENT _____ E. TRAVEL 1. DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA, MEXICO AND U.S. POSSESSIONS) 3500 _____ 2. FOREIGN _____ _____ F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT 1. STIPENDS $ _____ 2. TRAVEL _____ 3. SUBSISTENCE _____ 4. OTHER _____ TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS (_____) TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS _____ _____ G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS _____ _____ 1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 8000 _____ 2. PUBLICATION/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION 250 _____ 3. CONSULTANT SERVICES _____ _____ 4. COMPUTER SERVICES _____ _____ 5. SUBAWARDS _____ _____ 6. OTHER _____ 19000 _____ TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS 27250 _____ H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G) 76815 _____ I. INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) (SPECIFY RATE AND BASE) 63.5% _____ TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) 48777 _____ J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H + I) _____ _____ K. RESIDUAL FUNDS (IF FOR FURTHER SUPPORT OF CURRENT PROJECT SEE GPG II.D.7.j.) _____ _____ L. AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (J) OR (J MINUS K) $125592 $_____ M. COST SHARING: PROPOSED LEVEL $_____ AGREED LEVEL IF DIFFERENT: $_____ PI/PD TYPED NAME AND SIGNATURE* DATE FOR ORION USE ONLY

INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATIONORG. REP. TYPED NAME & SIGNATURE* DATE Date Checked Date of Rate Sheet Initials-ORG _____ _____

OOI Form 1030 (10/99) Supersedes All Previous Editions *SIGNATURES REQUIRED ONLY FOR REVISED BUDGET (GPG III.C)

ANNUAL PROPOSAL BUDGET – Year 5 FOR ORION USE ONLY

ORGANIZATION Yale School of Forestry and Env. Studies

PROPOSAL NO. DURATION (MONTHS)

Proposed Granted PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR/PROJECT DIRECTOR Peter A Raymond

AWARD NO.

A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD, Co-PIs, Faculty and Other Senior Associates Funded Funds Funds List each separately with name and title. (A.7. Show number in brackets) Person-months Requested By Granted

CAL ACAD SUMR Proposer (If Different) 1. Peter A Raymond __ __ 1 $9227 $_____ 2. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 3. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 4. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 5. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 6. (___) OTHERS (LIST INDIVIDUALLY ON BUDGET EXPLANATION PAGE) __ __ __ _____ _____ 7. (___) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1-6) __ __ __ _____ _____ B. OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS) 1. (___) POSTDOCTORAL ASSOCIATES __ __ __ _____ _____ 2. (1) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN, PROGRAMMER, ETC.) 6 __ __ 23397 _____ 3. (5) GRADUATE STUDENTS 4000 _____ 4. (___) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS _____ _____ 5. (___) SECRETARIAL - CLERICAL (IF CHARGED DIRECTLY) _____ _____ 6. (___) OTHER _____ _____ TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A + B) _____ _____ C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS) 11104 _____ TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A + B + C) 47728 _____ D. EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING $5,000.) 3 Shimadzu flow thru units 3 Quardipole mass spec units _____ TOTAL EQUIPMENT _____ E. TRAVEL 1. DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA, MEXICO AND U.S. POSSESSIONS) 3500 _____ 2. FOREIGN _____ _____ F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT 1. STIPENDS $ _____ 2. TRAVEL _____ 3. SUBSISTENCE _____ 4. OTHER _____ TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS (_____) TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS _____ _____ G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS _____ _____ 1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 8000 _____ 2. PUBLICATION/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION 250 _____ 3. CONSULTANT SERVICES _____ _____ 4. COMPUTER SERVICES _____ _____ 5. SUBAWARDS _____ _____ 6. OTHER _____ 19000 _____ TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS 27250 _____ H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G) 78478 _____ I. INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) (SPECIFY RATE AND BASE) 63.5% _____ TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) 49834 _____ J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H + I) _____ _____ K. RESIDUAL FUNDS (IF FOR FURTHER SUPPORT OF CURRENT PROJECT SEE GPG II.D.7.j.) _____ _____ L. AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (J) OR (J MINUS K) $128312 $_____ M. COST SHARING: PROPOSED LEVEL $_____ AGREED LEVEL IF DIFFERENT: $_____ PI/PD TYPED NAME AND SIGNATURE* DATE FOR ORION USE ONLY

INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATIONORG. REP. TYPED NAME & SIGNATURE* DATE Date Checked Date of Rate Sheet Initials-ORG _____ _____

OOI Form 1030 (10/99) Supersedes All Previous Editions *SIGNATURES REQUIRED ONLY FOR REVISED BUDGET (GPG III.C)

CUMULATIVE PROPOSAL BUDGET FOR ORION USE ONLY

ORGANIZATION Yale School of Forestry and Env. Studies

PROPOSAL NO. DURATION (MONTHS)

Proposed Granted PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR/PROJECT DIRECTOR Peter A Raymond

AWARD NO.

A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD, Co-PIs, Faculty and Other Senior Associates Funded Funds Funds List each separately with name and title. (A.7. Show number in brackets) Person-months Requested By Granted

CAL ACAD SUMR Proposer (If Different) 1. Peter A Raymond __ __ 5 $42719 $_____ 2. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 3. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 4. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 5. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 6. (___) OTHERS (LIST INDIVIDUALLY ON BUDGET EXPLANATION PAGE) __ __ __ _____ _____ 7. (___) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1-6) __ __ __ _____ _____ B. OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS) 1. (___) POSTDOCTORAL ASSOCIATES __ __ __ _____ _____ 2. (1) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN, PROGRAMMER, ETC.) 30 __ __ 108326 _____ 3. (5) GRADUATE STUDENTS 20000 _____ 4. (___) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS _____ _____ 5. (___) SECRETARIAL - CLERICAL (IF CHARGED DIRECTLY) _____ _____ 6. (___) OTHER _____ _____ TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A + B) _____ _____ C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS) 49970 _____ TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A + B + C) 221014 _____ D. EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING $5,000.) 3 Shimadzu flow thru units 3 Quardipole mass spec units _____ TOTAL EQUIPMENT 135000 _____ E. TRAVEL 1. DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA, MEXICO AND U.S. POSSESSIONS) 17500 _____ 2. FOREIGN _____ _____ F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT 1. STIPENDS $ _____ 2. TRAVEL _____ 3. SUBSISTENCE _____ 4. OTHER _____ TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS (_____) TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS _____ _____ G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS _____ _____ 1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 50000 _____ 2. PUBLICATION/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION 1250 _____ 3. CONSULTANT SERVICES _____ _____ 4. COMPUTER SERVICES _____ _____ 5. SUBAWARDS _____ _____ 6. OTHER _____ 95000 _____ TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS _____ _____ H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G) 519764 _____ I. INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) (SPECIFY RATE AND BASE) 63.5% _____ TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) 244326 _____ J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H + I) _____ _____ K. RESIDUAL FUNDS (IF FOR FURTHER SUPPORT OF CURRENT PROJECT SEE GPG II.D.7.j.) _____ _____ L. AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (J) OR (J MINUS K) $764,089 $_____ M. COST SHARING: PROPOSED LEVEL $_____ AGREED LEVEL IF DIFFERENT: $_____ PI/PD TYPED NAME AND SIGNATURE* DATE FOR ORION USE ONLY

INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATIONORG. REP. TYPED NAME & SIGNATURE* DATE Date Checked Date of Rate Sheet Initials-ORG _____ _____

OOI Form 1030 (10/99) Supersedes All Previous Editions *SIGNATURES REQUIRED ONLY FOR REVISED BUDGET (GPG III.C)

SUMMARY PROPOSAL BUDGET: 2007

FOR ORION USE ONLY

ORGANIZATION SMAST, UMass Dartmouth

PROPOSAL NO. DURATION (MONTHS)

Proposed Granted PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR/PROJECT DIRECTOR Edward R. Levine

AWARD NO.

A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD, Co-PIs, Faculty and Other Senior Associates Funded Funds Funds List each separately with name and title. (A.7. Show number in brackets) Person-months Requested By Granted

CAL ACAD SUMR Proposer (If Different) 1. Edward R. Levine, Adjunct Professor 1 __ __ 6,774 $_____ 2. Louis Goodman, Professor 1 __ __ 6,774 _____ 3. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 4. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 5. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 6. (0) OTHERS (LIST INDIVIDUALLY ON BUDGET EXPLANATION PAGE) __ __ __ _____ _____ 7. (2) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1-6) 2 __ __ _____ _____ B. OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS) 1. (0) POSTDOCTORAL ASSOCIATES __ __ __ _____ _____ 2. (1) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN, PROGRAMMER, ETC.) 1 __ __ 3097 _____ 3. (0) GRADUATE STUDENTS _____ _____ 4. (0) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS _____ _____ 5. (0) SECRETARIAL - CLERICAL (IF CHARGED DIRECTLY) _____ _____ 6. (0) OTHER _____ _____ TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A + B) 16,645 _____ C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS) 9,155 _____ TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A + B + C) 25,800 _____ D. EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING $5,000.) Turbulence profiler 80,000 _____ _____ TOTAL EQUIPMENT 80,000 _____ E. TRAVEL 1. DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA, MEXICO AND U.S. POSSESSIONS) 3,000 _____ 2. FOREIGN 0 _____ F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT 1. STIPENDS $ 0 2. TRAVEL _____ 3. SUBSISTENCE _____ 4. OTHER _____ TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS (_____) TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS 0 _____ G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS _____ 1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 3000 _____ 2. PUBLICATION/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION _____ _____ 3. CONSULTANT SERVICES _____ _____ 4. COMPUTER SERVICES _____ _____ 5. SUBAWARDS _____ _____ 6. OTHER _____ 1,100 _____ TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS _____ _____ H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G) 112,100 _____ I. INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) (SPECIFY RATE AND BASE) _____ _____ 13,712 TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) 13,712 _____ J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H + I) _____ _____ K. RESIDUAL FUNDS (IF FOR FURTHER SUPPORT OF CURRENT PROJECT SEE GPG II.D.7.j.) _____ _____ L. AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (J) OR (J MINUS K) $125,812 $_____ M. COST SHARING: PROPOSED LEVEL $20,000 AGREED LEVEL IF DIFFERENT: $_____ PI/PD TYPED NAME AND SIGNATURE* DATE FOR ORION USE ONLY

Edward R Levine Adjunct professor 5/25/2005 INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATIONORG. REP. TYPED NAME & SIGNATURE* DATE Date Checked Date of Rate Sheet Initials-ORG Wendell Brown, Chair 5/25/2005

OOI Form 1030 (10/99) Supersedes All Previous Editions *SIGNATURES REQUIRED ONLY FOR REVISED BUDGET (GPG III.C)

SUMMARY PROPOSAL BUDGET: 2008 FOR ORION USE ONLY

ORGANIZATION SMAST, UMass Dartmouth

PROPOSAL NO. DURATION (MONTHS)

Proposed Granted PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR/PROJECT DIRECTOR Edward R. Levine

AWARD NO.

A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD, Co-PIs, Faculty and Other Senior Associates Funded Funds Funds List each separately with name and title. (A.7. Show number in brackets) Person-months Requested By Granted

CAL ACAD SUMR Proposer (If Different) 1. Edward R. Levine, Adjunct Professor 1 __ __ $6,910 $_____ 2. Louis Goodman, Professor 1 __ __ $6910 _____ 3. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 4. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 5. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 6. (0) OTHERS (LIST INDIVIDUALLY ON BUDGET EXPLANATION PAGE) __ __ __ _____ _____ 7. (2) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1-6) __ __ __ _____ _____ B. OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS) 1. (0) POSTDOCTORAL ASSOCIATES __ __ __ _____ _____ 2. (1) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN, PROGRAMMER, ETC.) 1 __ __ 3,083 _____ 3. (0) GRADUATE STUDENTS _____ _____ 4. (0) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS _____ _____ 5. (0) SECRETARIAL - CLERICAL (IF CHARGED DIRECTLY) _____ _____ 6. (0) OTHER _____ _____ TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A + B) 16,903 _____ C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS) 9,317 _____ TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A + B + C) 26,220 _____ D. EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING $5,000.) T-REMUS upgrades 40,000 _____ _____ TOTAL EQUIPMENT 40,000 _____ E. TRAVEL 1. DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA, MEXICO AND U.S. POSSESSIONS) 3,000 _____ 2. FOREIGN 0 _____ F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT 1. STIPENDS $ 0 2. TRAVEL _____ 3. SUBSISTENCE _____ 4. OTHER _____ TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS (_____) TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS 0 _____ G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS _____ 1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 3000 _____ 2. PUBLICATION/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION _____ _____ 3. CONSULTANT SERVICES _____ _____ 4. COMPUTER SERVICES _____ _____ 5. SUBAWARDS _____ _____ 6. OTHER _____ 1,100 _____ TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS _____ _____ H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G) 72,520 _____ I. INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) (SPECIFY RATE AND BASE) _____ _____ 13,944 TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) 13,944 _____ J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H + I) _____ _____ K. RESIDUAL FUNDS (IF FOR FURTHER SUPPORT OF CURRENT PROJECT SEE GPG II.D.7.j.) _____ _____ L. AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (J) OR (J MINUS K) $89,464 $_____ M. COST SHARING: PROPOSED LEVEL $25,000 AGREED LEVEL IF DIFFERENT: $_____ PI/PD TYPED NAME AND SIGNATURE* DATE FOR ORION USE ONLY

Edward R Levine Adjunct professor 5/25/2005 INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATIONORG. REP. TYPED NAME & SIGNATURE* DATE Date Checked Date of Rate Sheet Initials-ORG Wendell Brown, Chair 5/25/2005

OOI Form 1030 (10/99) Supersedes All Previous Editions *SIGNATURES REQUIRED ONLY FOR REVISED BUDGET (GPG III.C)

SUMMARY PROPOSAL BUDGET: 2009 FOR ORION USE ONLY

ORGANIZATION SMAST, UMass Dartmouth

PROPOSAL NO. DURATION (MONTHS)

Proposed Granted PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR/PROJECT DIRECTOR Edward R. Levine

AWARD NO.

A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD, Co-PIs, Faculty and Other Senior Associates Funded Funds Funds List each separately with name and title. (A.7. Show number in brackets) Person-months Requested By Granted

CAL ACAD SUMR Proposer (If Different) 1. Edward R. Levine, Adjunct Professor 1 __ __ $7048 $_____ 2. Louis Goodman, Professor 1 __ __ 7048 _____ 3. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 4. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 5. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 6. (0) OTHERS (LIST INDIVIDUALLY ON BUDGET EXPLANATION PAGE) __ __ __ _____ _____ 7. (2) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1-6) __ __ __ _____ _____ B. OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS) 1. (0) POSTDOCTORAL ASSOCIATES __ __ __ _____ _____ 2. (1) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN, PROGRAMMER, ETC.) 1 __ __ _____ _____ 3. (0) GRADUATE STUDENTS _____ _____ 4. (0) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS _____ _____ 5. (0) SECRETARIAL - CLERICAL (IF CHARGED DIRECTLY) _____ _____ 6. (0) OTHER 3096 _____ TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A + B) 17,192 _____ C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS) 9,456 _____ TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A + B + C) 26,648 _____ D. EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING $5,000.) T-REMUS upgrades 25,000 _____ _____ TOTAL EQUIPMENT 25,000 _____ E. TRAVEL 1. DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA, MEXICO AND U.S. POSSESSIONS) 3,000 _____ 2. FOREIGN 0 _____ F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT 1. STIPENDS $ 0 2. TRAVEL _____ 3. SUBSISTENCE _____ 4. OTHER _____ TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS (_____) TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS 0 _____ G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS _____ 1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 3000 _____ 2. PUBLICATION/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION _____ _____ 3. CONSULTANT SERVICES _____ _____ 4. COMPUTER SERVICES _____ _____ 5. SUBAWARDS _____ _____ 6. OTHER _____ 1,100 _____ TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS _____ _____ H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G) 57,948 _____ I. INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) (SPECIFY RATE AND BASE) _____ _____ TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) 14,178 _____ J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H + I) _____ _____ K. RESIDUAL FUNDS (IF FOR FURTHER SUPPORT OF CURRENT PROJECT SEE GPG II.D.7.j.) _____ _____ L. AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (J) OR (J MINUS K) $72,126 $_____ M. COST SHARING: PROPOSED LEVEL $25,000 AGREED LEVEL IF DIFFERENT: $_____ PI/PD TYPED NAME AND SIGNATURE* DATE FOR ORION USE ONLY

Edward R Levine Adjunct professor 5/25/2005 INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATIONORG. REP. TYPED NAME & SIGNATURE* DATE Date Checked Date of Rate Sheet Initials-ORG Wendell Brown, Chair 5/25/2005

OOI Form 1030 (10/99) Supersedes All Previous Editions *SIGNATURES REQUIRED ONLY FOR REVISED BUDGET (GPG III.C)

SUMMARY PROPOSAL BUDGET: 2010 FOR ORION USE ONLY

ORGANIZATION SMAST, UMass Dartmouth

PROPOSAL NO. DURATION (MONTHS)

Proposed Granted PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR/PROJECT DIRECTOR Edward R. Levine

AWARD NO.

A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD, Co-PIs, Faculty and Other Senior Associates Funded Funds Funds List each separately with name and title. (A.7. Show number in brackets) Person-months Requested By Granted

CAL ACAD SUMR Proposer (If Different) 1. Edward R. Levine, Adjunct Professor 1 __ __ $7189 $_____ 2. Louis Goodman, Professor 1 __ __ 7189 _____ 3. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 4. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 5. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 6. (0) OTHERS (LIST INDIVIDUALLY ON BUDGET EXPLANATION PAGE) __ __ __ _____ _____ 7. (2) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1-6) __ __ __ _____ _____ B. OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS) 1. (0) POSTDOCTORAL ASSOCIATES __ __ __ _____ _____ 2. (1) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN, PROGRAMMER, ETC.) 1 __ __ 3097 _____ 3. (0) GRADUATE STUDENTS _____ _____ 4. (0) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS _____ _____ 5. (0) SECRETARIAL - CLERICAL (IF CHARGED DIRECTLY) _____ _____ 6. (0) OTHER _____ _____ TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A + B) 17,475 _____ C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS) 9611 _____ TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A + B + C) 27,086 _____ D. EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING $5,000.) 25,000 _____ _____ TOTAL EQUIPMENT 0 _____ E. TRAVEL 1. DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA, MEXICO AND U.S. POSSESSIONS) 3,000 _____ 2. FOREIGN 0 _____ F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT 1. STIPENDS $ 0 2. TRAVEL _____ 3. SUBSISTENCE _____ 4. OTHER _____ TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS (_____) TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS 0 _____ G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS _____ 1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 3000 _____ 2. PUBLICATION/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION _____ _____ 3. CONSULTANT SERVICES _____ _____ 4. COMPUTER SERVICES _____ _____ 5. SUBAWARDS _____ _____ 6. OTHER _____ 1,100 _____ TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS _____ _____ H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G) 33,386 _____ I. INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) (SPECIFY RATE AND BASE) _____ _____ TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) 14,444 _____ J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H + I) _____ _____ K. RESIDUAL FUNDS (IF FOR FURTHER SUPPORT OF CURRENT PROJECT SEE GPG II.D.7.j.) _____ _____ L. AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (J) OR (J MINUS K) $47,830 $_____ M. COST SHARING: PROPOSED LEVEL $20,000 AGREED LEVEL IF DIFFERENT: $_____ PI/PD TYPED NAME AND SIGNATURE* DATE FOR ORION USE ONLY

Edward R Levine Adjunct professor 5/25/2005 INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATIONORG. REP. TYPED NAME & SIGNATURE* DATE Date Checked Date of Rate Sheet Initials-ORG Wendell Brown, Chair 5/25/2005

OOI Form 1030 (10/99) Supersedes All Previous Editions *SIGNATURES REQUIRED ONLY FOR REVISED BUDGET (GPG III.C)

SUMMARY PROPOSAL BUDGET : 2011 FOR ORION USE ONLY

ORGANIZATION SMAST, UMass Dartmouth

PROPOSAL NO. DURATION (MONTHS)

Proposed Granted PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR/PROJECT DIRECTOR Edward R. Levine

AWARD NO.

A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD, Co-PIs, Faculty and Other Senior Associates Funded Funds Funds List each separately with name and title. (A.7. Show number in brackets) Person-months Requested By Granted

CAL ACAD SUMR Proposer (If Different) 1. Edward R. Levine, Adjunct Professor 1 __ __ $7189 $_____ 2. Louis Goodman, Professor 1 __ __ 7189 _____ 3. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 4. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 5. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 6. (0) OTHERS (LIST INDIVIDUALLY ON BUDGET EXPLANATION PAGE) __ __ __ _____ _____ 7. (2) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1-6) __ __ __ _____ _____ B. OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS) 1. (0) POSTDOCTORAL ASSOCIATES __ __ __ _____ _____ 2. (1) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN, PROGRAMMER, ETC.) 1 __ __ 3383 _____ 3. (0) GRADUATE STUDENTS _____ _____ 4. (0) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS _____ _____ 5. (0) SECRETARIAL - CLERICAL (IF CHARGED DIRECTLY) _____ _____ 6. (0) OTHER _____ _____ TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A + B) 17,761 _____ C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS) 9769 _____ TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A + B + C) 27,530 _____ D. EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING $5,000.) _____ _____ TOTAL EQUIPMENT 0 _____ E. TRAVEL 1. DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA, MEXICO AND U.S. POSSESSIONS) 3,000 _____ 2. FOREIGN 0 _____ F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT 1. STIPENDS $ 0 2. TRAVEL _____ 3. SUBSISTENCE _____ 4. OTHER _____ TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS (_____) TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS 0 _____ G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS _____ 1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 3000 _____ 2. PUBLICATION/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION _____ _____ 3. CONSULTANT SERVICES _____ _____ 4. COMPUTER SERVICES _____ _____ 5. SUBAWARDS _____ _____ 6. OTHER _____ 1,100 _____ TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS _____ _____ H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G) 33,830 _____ I. INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) (SPECIFY RATE AND BASE) _____ _____ TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) 14,668 _____ J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H + I) _____ _____ K. RESIDUAL FUNDS (IF FOR FURTHER SUPPORT OF CURRENT PROJECT SEE GPG II.D.7.j.) _____ _____ L. AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (J) OR (J MINUS K) $49,498 $_____ M. COST SHARING: PROPOSED LEVEL $20,000 AGREED LEVEL IF DIFFERENT: $_____ PI/PD TYPED NAME AND SIGNATURE* DATE FOR ORION USE ONLY

Edward R Levine Adjunct professor 5/25/2005 INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATIONORG. REP. TYPED NAME & SIGNATURE* DATE Date Checked Date of Rate Sheet Initials-ORG Wendell Brown, Chair 5/25/2005

OOI Form 1030 (10/99) Supersedes All Previous Editions *SIGNATURES REQUIRED ONLY FOR REVISED BUDGET (GPG III.C)

CUMULATIVE PROPOSAL BUDGET FOR ORION USE ONLY

ORGANIZATION SMAST Umass Dartmouth

PROPOSAL NO. DURATION (MONTHS)

Proposed Granted PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR/PROJECT DIRECTOR E.R. Levine

AWARD NO.

A. SENIOR PERSONNEL: PI/PD, Co-PIs, Faculty and Other Senior Associates Funded Funds Funds List each separately with name and title. (A.7. Show number in brackets) Person-months Requested By Granted

CAL ACAD SUMR Proposer (If Different) 1. E. R. Levine, Adjunct Professor __5 __ __ $35252 $_____ 2. L. Goodman, Professor __5 __ __ 35,252 _____ 3. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 4. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 5. _____ __ __ __ _____ _____ 6. (___) OTHERS (LIST INDIVIDUALLY ON BUDGET EXPLANATION PAGE) __ __ __ _____ _____ 7. (2) TOTAL SENIOR PERSONNEL (1-6) __ __ __ _____ _____ B. OTHER PERSONNEL (SHOW NUMBERS IN BRACKETS) 1. (0) POSTDOCTORAL ASSOCIATES __ __ __ _____ _____ 2. (1) OTHER PROFESSIONALS (TECHNICIAN, PROGRAMMER, ETC.) 5 __ __ 15,486 _____ 3. (0) GRADUATE STUDENTS _____ _____ 4. (0) UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS _____ _____ 5. (0) SECRETARIAL - CLERICAL (IF CHARGED DIRECTLY) _____ _____ 6. (0) OTHER _____ _____ TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES (A + B) 85,990 _____ C. FRINGE BENEFITS (IF CHARGED AS DIRECT COSTS) 47,294 _____ TOTAL SALARIES, WAGES AND FRINGE BENEFITS (A + B + C) 133,284 _____ D. EQUIPMENT (LIST ITEM AND DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR EACH ITEM EXCEEDING $5,000.) Turbulence profiler 80,000 T-REMUS upgrades 65.000 _____ TOTAL EQUIPMENT 145,000_____ _____ E. TRAVEL 1. DOMESTIC (INCL. CANADA, MEXICO AND U.S. POSSESSIONS) 15,000 _____ 2. FOREIGN _____ _____ F. PARTICIPANT SUPPORT 1. STIPENDS $ 0 2. TRAVEL 0 3. SUBSISTENCE 0 4. OTHER 0_____ TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS (0) TOTAL PARTICIPANT COSTS _____ _____ G. OTHER DIRECT COSTS _____ _____ 1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 15,000 _____ 2. PUBLICATION/DOCUMENTATION/DISSEMINATION 0_____ _____ 3. CONSULTANT SERVICES 0 _____ 4. COMPUTER SERVICES 0 _____ 5. SUBAWARDS 0 _____ 6. OTHER _____ _____ _____ TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS 5,500 _____ H. TOTAL DIRECT COSTS (A THROUGH G) _____ _____ I. INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) (SPECIFY RATE AND BASE) _____ _____ TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS (F&A) 70,946 _____ J. TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS (H + I) 384,730 _____ K. RESIDUAL FUNDS (IF FOR FURTHER SUPPORT OF CURRENT PROJECT SEE GPG II.D.7.j.) 0 _____ L. AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (J) OR (J MINUS K) $384,730 $_____ M. COST SHARING: PROPOSED LEVEL $100,000 AGREED LEVEL IF DIFFERENT: $_____ PI/PD TYPED NAME AND SIGNATURE* DATE FOR ORION USE ONLY

Edward R Levine Adjunct Professor 5/25/2005 INDIRECT COST RATE VERIFICATIONORG. REP. TYPED NAME & SIGNATURE* DATE Date Checked Date of Rate Sheet Initials-ORG _____Wendell Brown, Program Chair 5/25/2005

OOI Form 1030 (10/99) Supersedes All Previous Editions *SIGNATURES REQUIRED ONLY FOR REVISED BUDGET (GPG III.C)

Geyer CV - 1 of 2

WAYNE ROCKWELL GEYER Education: Ph.D. Physical Oceanography, University of Washington, Seattle, WA – 1985 M.S. Physical Oceanography, University of Washington, Seattle, WA – 1981 B.A. Geology, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH – 1977 Experience: Senior Scientist and Chair, Applied Ocean Physics & Engineering Dept., Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI) 2001-present. Director, Rinehart Coastal Research Center (WHOI) 1996-2001. Associate Scientist, Applied Ocean Physics & Engineering Dept., (WHOI), 1991-2001. Assistant Scientist, Applied Ocean Physics & Engineering Dept., (WHOI) 1987-1990. Postdoctoral Investigator, Ocean Engineering Dept., WHOI 1986-1987. Postdoctoral Scholar, Ocean Engineering Dept., WHOI (with William D. Grant) 1985-1986. Research Associate, University of Washington, Seattle, WA (with J. Dungan Smith) 1981-1985. Research Assistant, University of Washington and Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory, Seattle, WA (with Glenn A. Cannon) 1979-1981.

Research Interests: Estuarine and coastal transport processes; sediment transport; numerical modeling of estuaries and river plumes. Related Publications: 1. Nepf, H. M. and W. R. Geyer, 1996. Intratidal variations in stratification and mixing in the

Hudson estuary. J. Geophys. Res., 101(C5), 12,079-12,086. 2. Trowbridge, J.H., W.R. Geyer, M.M. Bowen and A.J. Williams 3rd, 1999. Near-bottom

turbulence measurements in a partially mixed estuary: Turbulent energy balance, velocity structure, and along-channel momentum balance. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 29(12), 3056-3072.

3. Geyer, W. R., J. H. Trowbridge and M. M. Bowen, 2000. The Dynamics of a Partially Mixed

Estuary. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 30(8): 2035-2048.

4. MacDonald, D. G., and W. R. Geyer, 2004, Turbulent energy production and entrainment at a highly stratified estuarine front, J. Geophys. Res., 109, C05004, doi:10.1029/2003JC002094. 17pp.

5. James A. Lerczak and W. R. Geyer, 2004. Modeling the lateral circulation in straight, stratified estuaries. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 34: 1410

Other Significant Publications: 1. Geyer, W.R., P.S. Hill, T.G. Milligan and P. Traykovski, 2000. The structure of the Eel River

plume during floods. Cont. Shelf Res., 20(16), 2067-2093.

2. Geyer, W.R., J.D. Woodruff and P. Traykovski, 2001. Sediment transport and trapping in the Hudson River estuary. Estuaries, 24(5), 670-679.

Geyer CV - 2 of 2

3. MacCready, P. and W.R. Geyer, 2001. Estuarine salt flux through an isohaline surface, J. Geophys. Res., 106(C6), 11,629-11,637.

4. MacCready, P., R. D. Hetland and W. R. Geyer, 2002. Long-Term Isohaline Salt Balance in an

Estuary. Continental Shelf Research, 22(11-13), 1591-1601 5. Bowen, M. M., Geyer, W. Rockwell, 2003. Salt transport and the time-dependent salt balance of

a partially stratified estuary. J. Geophys. Res., 108(C5), 10.1029/2001JC001231. Synergistic Activities: Geyer has been a major advocate for interdisciplinary research throughout his career, particularly in communicating physical processes to non-physicists. This contribution has been manifest in published papers, book chapters as well as his participation in interdisciplinary research programs and workshops. He has also communicated the role of physical processes to regional environmental issues (such as the impact of the Boston sewage outfall) to the non-scientific public in numerous presentations and panel discussions. Collaborators (Last 48 months): M. Bowen, National Center for Atmospheric Research R. Chant, Rutgers University R. Hetland, Texas A&M University P. Hill, Dalhousie University R. Houghton, Columbia University D. Jay, Oregon Graduate Institute G. Kineke, Boston College P. MacCready, University of Washington T. Milligan, Bedford Institute of Oceanography J. Morris, University of South Carolina B. Mullenbach, Texas A&M University C. Nittrouer, University of Washington F. Prahl, Oregon State University N. Driscoll, Scripps Institute of Oceanography C. Sommerfield, University of Delaware Graduate Student and Postdoctoral Scholars: M. Bowen, National Center for Atmospheric Research D. Fong, Stanford University G. Kineke, Boston College D. McDonald, University of MA, Dartmouth B. Mullenbach, Texas A&M H. Nepf, MIT R. Signell, USGS C. Sommerfield, University of Delaware J. Wang, University of Alaska-Fairbanks J. Woodruff, Newburyport Public Schools, MA Ph.D. Advisor: J.D. Smith, USGS

Charette CV – page 1 of 2

BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH MATTHEW ADAM CHARETTE Associate Scientist Department of Marine Chemistry and Geochemistry Telephone: (508) 289-3205 Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Fax: (508) 457-2193 Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543 E-mail: mcharette@whoi.edu EDUCATION B.S. 1994 Florida Institute of Technology (Chemical Oceanography-with high honors) Ph.D. 1998 Graduate School of Oceanography/University of Rhode Island (Chemical Oceanography) PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 1994-1995 CHN State Assistantship, Univ. Rhode Island (GSO/URI), Narragansett, RI 1995-1996 Graduate Research Assistant II, GSO/URI, Narragansett, RI 1996-1997 Graduate Teaching Assistant, Chemical Oceanography, GSO/URI, Narragansett, RI 1997-1998 Graduate Research Assistant III, GSO/URI, Narragansett, RI 1998-1999 Postdoctoral Fellow, Woods Hole Oceanographic Inst. (WHOI), Woods Hole, MA 1999-2000 Postdoctoral Investigator, WHOI, Woods Hole, MA 2000-2004 Assistant Scientist, WHOI, Woods Hole, MA 2001-2004 Coastal Ocean Institute Fellow, WHOI, Woods Hole, MA 2004-present Associate Scientist, WHOI, Woods Hole, MA PUBLICATIONS Five Publications Most Relevant to the Proposed Research: Charette M. A. and Sholkovitz E. R. (2002) Oxidative precipitation of groundwater-derived ferrous

iron in the subterranean estuary of a coastal bay. Geophysial Research Letters. 29 (10), 10.1029/2001GL014512.

Charette, M.A., and K.O. Buesseler. (2004) Submarine groundwater discharge of nutrients and

copper to an urban subestuary of Chesapeake Bay (Elizabeth River), Limnology and Oceanography, 49, 376-385.

Charette, M.A., K.O. Buesseler, and J.E. Andrews (2001) Utility of radium isotopes for evaluating the

input and transport of groundwater-derived nitrogen in a Cape Cod estuary, Limnol Oceanogr. 46, 465-470.

Charette, M.A., R. Splivallo, C. Herbold, M. Bollinger, and W.S. Moore. (2003) Salt marsh submarine

groundwater discharge as traced by radium isotopes, Marine Chemistry, 84, 113-121. Sholkovitz, E.R., C. Herbold, and M.A. Charette. (2003) An automated dye-dilution based seepage meter

for the time-series measurement of submarine groundwater discharge, Limnology and Oceanography:Methods, 1, 17-29.

Charette CV – page 2 of 2

Five Other Relevant Publications:

Abraham, D.R., M.A. Charette, M.C. Allen, A. Rago, and K.D. Kroeger. (2003) Radiochemical estimates of submarine groundwater discharge to Waquoit Bay, Massachusetts. Biological Bulletin, 205, 246-247.

Talbot, J. M., K.D. Kroeger, A. Rago, M.C. Allen, and M.A. Charette. (2003) Nitrogen flux and

speciation through the subterranean estuary of Waquoit Bay, Massachusetts. Biological Bulletin, 205, 244-245.

Testa, J.M., M.A. Charette, E.R. Sholkovitz, M.C. Allen, A. Rago, and C.W. Herbold. (2002)

Dissolved iron cycling in the subterranean estuary of a coastal bay: Waquoit Bay, Massachusetts. Biological Bulletin, 203, 255-256.

Buesseler, K.O., J.E. Andrews, S.M. Pike, and M.A. Charette. (2004) Does iron fertilization enhance

carbon sequestration in the Southern Ocean? Science, 304, 414-417. Charette, M.A., E.R. Sholkovitz, and C. Hansel (2005) Trace element cycling in a subterranean estuary:

Part 1. Geochemistry of the permeable sediments. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, in press.

RECENT WORKING ASSOCIATIONS (LAST 48 MONTHS, OUTSIDE WHOI) W.S. Moore, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC C. Benitez-Nelson, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC T.W. Trull, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania P.W. Boyd, University of Otago, Otago, New Zealand R.L. Edwards, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN J.N. Smith, Bedford Institute of Oceanography, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada C.H. Pilskaln, University of Maine, Orono, ME W.M. Landing, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL J.K.B. Bishop, University of Victoria, BC, Canada

GRADUATE ADVISOR Dr. S. Bradley Moran, URI/GSO, Narragansett, RI

POSTDOCTORAL ADVISOR Dr. Ken O. Buesseler, WHOI, Woods Hole, MA

SYNERGISTIC ACTIVITIES The PI has actively involved undergraduate and high school students in his NSF-funded

research. Adam Rago, a winner of several national high school science fair awards, has participated in the field and laboratory aspects of past projects. Jeremy Testa from SUNY (Syracuse) was a 2002 summer intern funded through the Marine Biological Laboratory’s “Coastal Bays of New England” NSF-REU program in Woods Hole. His research led to a first authored paper (Testa et al., 2002) and a poster presentation at the 2003 ASLO meeting. Most recently, the PI worked with Jenny Talbot and Daniel Abraham, whose efforts led to two first authored papers (Talbot et al, 2003; Abraham et al., 2003). Testa and Abraham won awards at the MBL General Meetings for their work, and Testa won a student poster presentation award at the 2003 ASLO meeting in Salt Lake City.

Lentz CV – page 1 of 2

Steven J. Lentz Department of Physical Oceanography Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543 Tel: (508) 289-2808; Fax: (508) 457-4181 E-mail: slentz@whoi.edu B.A., University of California, San Diego, 1977 (mathematics); B.A., University of California, San Diego, 1977 (applied mechanics and engineering science); Ph.D., Scripps Institution of Oceanography, 1984. Senior Scientist, 2000-present; Associate Scientist, 1991-2000, tenure awarded, 1995; Assistant Scientist, 1987-91; Visiting Investigator, 1985-87; Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution. Research Assistant, 1984-85; Graduate Research Assistant, 1978-84; Center for Coastal Studies, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego. Relevant and/or Significant Publications Lentz, S., R. T. Guza, S. Elgar, F. Feddersen, and T. H. C. Herbers, 1999. Momentum

balances on the North Carolina inner shelf. Journal of Geophysical Research, 104(C8), 18,205-18,226.

Lentz, S., and J. Trowbridge, 2001. A dynamical description of fall and winter mean

current profiles over the northern California Shelf. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 31(4), 914-931.

Lentz, S. J., 2001. The influence of stratification on the wind-driven cross-shelf

circulation over the North Carolina shelf. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 31(9), 2749-2760.

Austin, Jay A., and Steven J. Lentz, 2002. The inner shelf response to wind-driven

upwelling and downwelling. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 32(7), 2171-2193.

Garland, E. D., C. A. Zimmer, and S. J. Lentz, 2002. Larval distributions in inner-shelf

waters: The roles of wind-driven cross-shelf currents and diel vertical migrations. Limnology and Oceanography, 47(3), 803-817.

Lentz, S., K Shearman, S. Anderson, A. Plueddemann, and J. Edson, 2003. The

evolution of stratification over the New England shelf during the Coastal Mixing and Optics study, August 1996-June 1997. Journal of Geophysical Research, 108(C1), 3008, doi:10.1029/2001JC001121.

Lentz CV – page 2 of 2

Lentz, Steven J., 2003. A climatology of salty intrusions over the continental shelf from Georges Bank to Cape Hatteras. Journal of Geophysical Research, 108(C10), 3326, doi:10.1029/2003JC001859.

Lentz, S. J., R. C. Beardsley, J. D. Irish, J. Manning, P. C. Smith, and R. A. Weller. 2003.

Temperature and salt balances on Georges Bank February-August 1995. Journal of Geophysical Research, 108(C11), doi:10.1029/2001JC001220.

Lentz, S. J., 2004. The response of buoyant coastal plumes to upwelling-favorable winds.

Journal of Physical Oceanography, 34(11), 2458-2469.

Chapman, D. C. and S. J. Lentz. Acceleration of a stratified current over a sloping bottom, driven by an alongshelf pressure gradient. Journal of Physical Oceanography, in press.

Synergistic Activities: My research focuses on a better understanding of physical

processes that impact a variety of important interdisciplinary problems, including coastal upwelling, ground-fish survival on Georges Bank, larval transport, and sediment transport. I collect oceanic and meteorological data, which is processed, documented in data reports, archived and made available to the general scientific community and students. R. Beardsley, R. Pawlowicz, and I have developed and made available to the oceanographic community Matlab based software that allows easy analysis of the tides and air-sea fluxes. I am active in the MIT/WHOI education program. I have also served on numerous Ph.D. thesis committees both within the MIT/WHOI program and at other institutions. I have also been principal advisor to three students who completed their doctoral degrees.

Collaborators within last four years: S. Anderson, J. Austin, R. Beardsley, K. Brink,

M. Carr, D. Chapman, J. Dean, E. Dever, J. Edson, S. Elgar, F. Fedderson, E. Garland, W. Geyer, H. Graber, R. Guza, B. Haus, K. Helfrich, T. Herbers, D. Hebert, J. Irish, J. Largier, R. Limeburner, J. Manning, N. Oakey, R. Pawlowicz, A. Plueddemann, B. Raubenheimer, S. Rennie, A. Shanks, L. Shay, R.K. Shearman, P. Smith, J. Trowbridge, R. Weller, S. Werner, A. Williams, and D. Wright, C. Zimmer.

Graduate Advisor: C. Winant, Scripps Ph.D. Students Advised: E. Dever, J. Austin, M. Bowen Post-Docs Supervised: R. K. Shearman

Lerczak CV – page 1 of 2

James Allen Lerczak Assistant Scientist Department of Physical Oceanography Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Woods Hole, MA 02543 Ph: 508-289-2805; Fax: 508-457-2181 Email: jlerczak@whoi.edu B.A. with Highest Honors in Physics (Magna Cum Laude) Williams College, Williamstown, Massachusetts, 1988; M.S. in Physics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, 1991; Ph.D. in Oceanography, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, California, 2000. Assistant Scientist, 2003 to present; Postdoctoral Investigator, 2002 to 2003; Postdoctoral Scholar, Department of Physical Oceanography, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA, 2000 to 2002; Research Assistant, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, CA, 1995 to 2000; Mathematical Statistician, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Mammal Laboratory, Seattle, WA, 1992 to 1995; Research Assistant, Depart-ment of Physics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 1989 to 1992; Research Technician, IBM Almaden Research Center, San Jose, CA, 1988 to 1989.

Research Interests: Estuarine dynamics, continental shelf processes, coastal internal tides and

nonlinear internal waves, numerical modeling of estuarine and coastal processes, physical/biological interactions.

Relevant and/or Significant Publications: Fowler, D. E., C. R. Brundle, J. A. Lerczak, and E Holtzberg, 1990. Core and valence XPS

spectra of clean cleaved single crystals of YBa2 Cu307. Journal of Electron Spectroscopy, 52, 323−339.

Lerczak, J. A., M. Schick, and G. Gompper, 1992. Variation with amphiphilic strength of the properties of ternary mixtures. Physical Review A, 46, 985−993.

Lerczak, J. A., and R. C. Hobbs, 1998. Calculating sighting distances from angular readings during shipboard aerial, and shore-based marine mammal surveys. Marine Mammal Science, 14, 590−599.

Lerczak, J. A., K. E. W. Shelden, and R. C. Hobbs, 2000. Application of suction-cup-attached VHF transmitters to the study of beluga, Delphinapterus leucas, surfacing behavior in Cook Inlet, Alaska. Marine Fisheries Research, 62, 99−111.

Lerczak, J. A., M. C. Hendershott, and C. D. Winant, 2001. Observations and modeling of coastal internal waves driven by a diurnal sea breeze. Journal of Geophysical Research, 106, 19,715−19,729.

Lerczak CV – page 2 of 2

Rugh, D. J., J. A. Lerczak, R. C. Hobbs, J. M. Waite, and J. L. Laake, 2002. The offshore distribution of gray whales as determined by shore-based, high-powered binoculars. Journal of Cetacean Research and Management, 4, 57−61.

Lerczak, J. A., C. D. Winant, and M. C. Hendershott, 2003. Observations of the semi-diurnal internal tide on the southern California slope and shelf. Journal of Geophysical Research, 108, 3068, doi:10.1029/2001JC001128.

Lerczak, J. A., and W. R. Geyer, 2004. Modeling the lateral circulation in straight, stratified estuaries. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 34, 1410-1428.

Warner, J. C., W. R. Geyer, and J. A. Lerczak, 2005. Numerical modeling of an estuary: A comprehensive skill assessment. Journal of Geophysical Research, 110, C05001, doi:10.1029/2004JC002691.

Synergistic Activities: Lectured at the Friday Harbor Summer School on Estuarine and Coastal Fluid Dynamics. Lectured at the Sea Education Association. Presently serving on the Ph.D. thesis committee of two students. Collaborators (Last 48 months): R. Beardsley, W. R. Geyer, S. Lentz, L. Mullineaux, J.

Warner (USGS.), R. Chant (Rutgers), R. Houghton (LDEO.), C. DiBacco (UBC), C. Winant, M. Hendershott (SIO)

Ph.D. Advisors: Myrl Hendershott, Clinton Winant (SIO) Ph.D. Students Advised: None

Mullineaux CV – page 1 of 2

LAUREN SUZANNE MULLINEAUX

Senior Scientist Holger W. Jannasch Chair Department of Biology Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Woods Hole, MA 02543

phone: (508) 289-2898 fax: 508 457-2134 email: lmullineaux@whoi.edu http://www.whoi.edu/science/B/people/lmullineaux/

EDUCATION: 1987 Ph.D., Oceanography, U.C. San Diego, Scripps Institution of Oceanography 1984 M.Sc., Earth Sciences, University of California, San Diego 1980 B.A., summa cum laude, Biology, Pomona College PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE:

2001- pres Senior Scientist, Biology Department, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution 1997-2002 Education Coordinator (J. Seward Johnson Chair), Biology Department, WHOI 1992-2001 Associate Scientist (tenured 1996), Biology Department, WHOI 1988-1992 Assistant Scientist, Biology Department, WHOI 1987-1988 Postdoctoral Investigator, Ocean Engineering Department, WHOI AWARDS, HONORS, NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEES:

2000-pres Associate Editor, Limnology and Oceanography 2004 Arnold B. Arons Award for Excellence in Teaching, Advising, and Mentoring 2003 Visiting Professor, Université Pierre & Marie CURIE, Paris France 2002-pres Holger W. Jannasch Chair for Excellence in Oceanography 2002-pres Member, Canada Research Chairs College of Reviewers 2002-2003 Member, NSF Steering Committee on Cabled Observatories for Time Series 1999-2000 Member, National Research Council Panel on Seafloor Observatories 1999 Member, NSF Ridge2000 organizing committee 1996-2000 Chair, InterRidge Biology Committee (International) 1995-2000 Member, InterRidge Steering Committee (International) 1995-2001 Member, NSF LARVE Coordinating Committee 1993-1997 Member, NSF RIDGE Steering Committee CRUISE EXPERIENCE:

Chief Scientist on 9 blue-water cruises (Atlantis /DSV Alvin, Atlantis II, Kila/DSV Pices V) Principal Investigator on 10 additional cruises (Atlantis/DSV Alvin, Atlantis II, New Horizon,

Thomas Washington, Ronald Brown) Participant in a total of 30 cruises since 1979. RESEARCH INTERESTS:

Larval dispersal and settlement in flow; Benthic community ecology; Deep-sea biology

Mullineaux CV – page 2 of 2

PUBLICATIONS, 10 RECENT: 2005 Mullineaux, L.S., S.W. Mills, A. K. Sweetman, A.H. Beaudreau, A. Metaxas, H.L. Hunt.

Spatial structure and temporal variation in larval abundance at hydrothermal vents on the East Pacific Rise. Marine Ecology Progress Series (in press)

2004 Fuchs, H.L., L. S. Mullineaux, and A. R. Solow. Sinking behavior of gastropod larvae (Ilyanassa obsoleta) in turbulence. Limnology and Oceanography 49: 1937-1948

2004 Hunt, H.L., A. Metaxas, R.M. Jennings, K.Halanych and L.S. Mullineaux Testing biological control of colonization by vestimentiferan tubeworms at deep-sea hydrothermal vents (East Pacific Rise, 9°50’N). Deep-Sea Research 51: 225-234

2003 Mullineaux, L.S., C.H. Peterson, F. Micheli and S.W. Mills. Successional mechanism varies along a gradient in hydrothermal fluid flux at deep-sea vents. Ecological Monographs 73(4):1-21

2002 Mullineaux, L.S., K.G. Speer, A.M. Thurnherr, M.E. Maltrud, A. Vangriesheim.

Implications of cross-axis flow for larval dispersal along mid-ocean ridges. Cahiers de Biologie Marine 43: 281-284.

2002 Hunt, H.L., D.A. McLean and L.S. Mullineaux. Alteration of spatial settlement patterns of the soft shell clam Mya arenaria by post-settlement events. Estuaries 26: 72-81.

2002 Hunt, H.L. and L.S. Mullineaux. The roles of predation and postlarval transport in recruitment of the soft shell clam Mya arenaria. Limnology & Oceanography 47:151-164.

2002 Micheli, F., C.H. Peterson, L.S. Mullineaux, C. Fisher, S.W. Mills, G. Sancho, G.A. Johnson and H.S. Lenihan. Predation structures communities at deep-sea hydrothermal vents. Ecological Monographs 72:365-382.

2001 Marsh, A. G., L. S. Mullineaux, C. M. Young and D. T. Manahan. 2001. Larval dispersal potential of the tubeworm Riftia pachyptila at deep-sea hydrothermal vents. Nature 411: 77-80.

2001 Gulmann, L.K., L.S. Mullineaux and H.L. Hunt. Effects of caging on retention of postlarval soft-shelled clams (Mya arenaria). Journal of Shellfish Research. 20: 135-142.

Synergistic activities: 1) Instructor for MIT/WHOI graduate courses in Biological Oceanography

and Benthic Ecology; Research Advisor for 19 undergraduates (1990-2004); 2) Presentations at Massachusetts Marine Educators workshops (2001-2002); 3) Featured scientist in NSF-sponsored web site ‘Remarkable Careers in Oceanography: Women Exploring the Oceans’ (www.womenoceanographers.org); 4) Interactions with local schools through Woods Hole Science & Technology Education Partnership; 5) Science presentations to writers for WHOI ‘Media Fellowship’ program; 6) Contribution of information to science curriculum books for grades 4-8 published by Harcourt; 7) Coach and judge for local science fairs; 8) Donation of deep-sea specimens and consultation for ‘Extreme Deep’ Exhibit (tours museums nationally); 9) Boston Museum of Science "Science by Mail" Correspondent

Close collaborators (last 4 years): C. DiBacco, C.R. Fisher, F. Gaill, W. Lavelle, H. Lenihan, L.

Levin, F. Micheli, J. Moore, C.H. Peterson, K. Speer, A. Thurnherr, A. Vangriesheim. Sponsored Postdocs: Scott France, Anna Metaxas, Heather Hunt, Stace Beaulieu. Sponsored Graduate Students: Stacy L. Kim (PhD 1996), Ewann A. Berntson (PhD 1998),

Gorka Sancho (PhD 1998), Lara K. Gulmann (PhD 2004), Heidi Fuchs (PhD exp. 2005), Rob Jennings, PhD exp. 2005), Diane Poehls (PhD exp. 2006), Carly Hammock (PhD exp. 2007)

Graduate and Postdoctoral Advisors: W. Riedel (MSc), R. Hessler (Ph.D), C. Zimmer (Postdoc)

Peucker-Ehrenbrink CV - pg 1of 2

BERNHARD PEUCKER-EHRENBRINK Geologist/Geochemist phone: (01) 508 289 2518 Tenured Associate Scientist fax: (01) 508 457 2193 Dept. Marine Chem. & Geochem., WHOI e-mail: behrenbrink@whoi.edu Woods Hole, MA 02543-1541, MS-25 URL: http://www.whoi.edu/people/bpeucker

Education: Ph. D., 1994 MPI Chemistry, Mainz, Germany (summa cum laude): Pb and Os isotope system- atics of metalliferous sediments from the Pacific Ocean. Advisor: AW Hofmann. Diplom, 1989 University of Göttingen, Germany (summa cum laude): Geochemistry of hydro- thermal quartz from the Bavarian Quartz dyke. Advisor: H-J Behr. Vordiplom, 1985 Technische Universität Clausthal, Germany.

Professional Experience Since May 2004 Tenured Associate Scientist at WHOI. Since Oct. 2003 Interim Director – Northeast National Ion Microprobe Facility. June 2000 – May 2004 Associate Scientist (untenured) at WHOI, Woods Hole, USA. July 1996 - June 2000 Assistant Scientist at WHOI, Woods Hole, USA. Nov. 1994 - July 1996 Postdoctoral Scholar at WHOI, Woods Hole, USA. June 1994 - Nov. 1994 Max-Planck-Research-Fellow, MPI Mainz, Germany.

Awards: 1994 WHOI Postdoctoral Fellowship; 1994 Dissertation Award (Johannes-Gutenberg Univ., Mainz)

Professional membership American Association for the Advancement of Science, American Geophysical Union, The Geochemical Society, European Union of Geosciences, Deutsche Mineralogische Gesellschaft, Geologische Vereinigung, Gesellschaft Deutscher Chemiker.

Research Interests: Marine isotope records; Continental weathering; Element exchange between mantle, continental crust and seawater; Accretion of extraterrestrial matter on Earth; Flux and dispersal of anthropogenic and volcanogenic PGE in the surficial environment.

Synergistic Activities: 1997 - Development of the “Noble Metal” web page summarizing research in our group (now at

www.whoi.edu/people/bpeucker. - Teaching “Solar System Evolution” with focus on comets, meteorites and impact cratering as part

of the “Joy of Learning” program at the local public library (Falmouth, MA). 2001 - Editor of “Accretion of Extraterrestrial Matter Throughout Earth’s History”, Kluwer

Academic/Plenum Publishers, N.Y., 466 pp. (co-editor: Birger Schmitz, Göteborg Univ.). Since 1996 – Teaching “Marine Isotope Geochemistry”, “Isotope Chemistry” and “Seminar in Chemical

Oceanography” in the MIT/WHOI Joint Program in Oceanography. Advising and mentoring Summer Student Fellows, Joint Program Students and WHOI Postdocs. Judging Falmouth High School Science Fairs (2003, 2004).

Peucker-Ehrenbrink CV - pg 2of 2

Most Relevant Publications Hassler DR, B Peucker-Ehrenbrink and GE Ravizza (2000) Rapid determination of Os isotopic

compositions by sparging OsO4 into a magnetic-sector ICP-MS. Chem. Geol. 166, 1-14. Peucker-Ehrenbrink B and RE Hannigan (2000) Effects of black shale weathering on the mobility of

rhenium and platinum group elements. Geology 28, 475-478. Martin CE, B Peucker-Ehrenbrink, G Brunskill and R Szymczak (2001) Isotope geochemistry of osmium

in a tropical estuary. GCA 65, 3193-3200. Peucker-Ehrenbrink B and B-m Jahn (2001) Rhenium-osmium isotope systematics and platinum group

element concentrations: Loess and the upper continental crust. G-cubed 2, doi: 10.1029/ 2001GC000172, 2001.

Jaffe LA, B Peucker-Ehrenbrink and ST Petsch (2002) Mobility of rhenium, platinum group elements and organic carbon during black shale weathering. EPSL 198, 339-353.

Other Significant Publications Peucker-Ehrenbrink B, G Ravizza and AW Hofmann (1995) The marine 187Os/186Os record of the past 80

million years. EPSL 130, 155-167. Peucker-Ehrenbrink B (1996) Accretion of extraterrestrial matter during the last 80 million years and its

effect on the marine Os isotope record. GCA 60, 3187-3196. Peucker-Ehrenbrink B and GE Ravizza (2000) The marine Os isotope record. Terra Nova 12 (5), 205-

219. Peucker-Ehrenbrink B, W Bach, SR Hart, JS Blusztajn and T Abbruzzese (2003) Rhenium-osmium

isotope systematics and platinum group element concentrations in oceanic crust from DSDP/ODP Sites 504 and 417/418. G-cubed 4 (7), 8911, doi: 10.1029/2002GC000414, 2003.

Ravizza G and B Peucker-Ehrenbrink (2003) Chemostratigraphic evidence of Deccan volcanism from the marine Os isotope record. Science 302, 1392-1395.

Collaborators (past 4 years, and not listed as advisors below) W Bach (WHOI), GJ Brunskill (AIMS, Australia), KA Farley (Caltech), K Hanghoj (LDEO), SR Hart (WHOI), B-m Jahn (Acad. Sinica, Taiwan), P Kelemen (LDEO), C Koeberl (U Vienna, Austria), P Kyle (New Mexico Tech), F Marcantonio (Tulane U), CE Martin (U Otago, New Zealand), T Mather (U Cambridge, UK), ST Petsch (UMASS Amherst), D Pyle (U. Cambridge, UK), B Schmitz (Lund U, Sweden), KWW Sims (WHOI), R Szymczak (ANSTO, Australia). Graduate Advisor: AW Hofmann (Max-Planck-Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, Germany) Post Doctoral Advisors: MD Kurz, G Ravizza, N Shimizu (all WHOI)

Robert Chant’s CV page 1

Curriculum Vitae NAME: Robert J. Chant, Ph.D. ADDRESS: Institute of Marine and Coastal Sciences Rutgers University 71 Dudley Road New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901 (732)-932-7120 chant@imcs.rutgers.edu CITIZENSHIP: USA Education State University of New York Buffalo B. S. 1985 Electrical Engineering State University of New York Stony Brook M. S. 1991 Marine Science State University of New York Stony Brook Ph.D. 1995 Oceanography POSTGRADUATE TRAINING: Rutgers University IMCS 1995-1998 ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS: 2002-present Assistant Professor, IMCS Rutgers University 1998-2002 Assistant Research Professor, IMCS Rutgers University 2002-Present Assistant Professor, IMCS Rutgers University EDITORIAL ACTIVITIES:

(ad hoc reviews) Dynamics of Atmospheres and Oceans Estuaries Estuarine and Coastal Shelf Science Environmental Science & Technology Journal of Continental Shelf Research Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans Journal of Hydraulic Engineering Journal of Hydrologic Engineering Journal of Marine Environmental Engineering Journal of Oceanography (Japan) Journal of Physical Oceanography Limnology and Oceanography

SERVICE ON NATIONAL GRANT REVIEW:

(ad hoc reviews) Illinois/Indiana Sea Grant Program Georgia Sea Grant Program North Carolina Sea Grant Program Maryland Sea Grant Program Delaware Sea Grant Program Maine Sea Grant Program Rhode Island Sea Grant National Science Foundation National Underwater Research Center National Ocean and Atmospheric Administration ECOHAB program

Marine Environmental Research Marine and Fresh Water Research

SERVICE ON NATIONAL GRANT REVIEW PANELS: National Science FoundationOceanography grant review panel. 2002.

Robert Chant’s CV page 2

Selected Publications Mikkelsen, O.A., P.S. Hill, T.G. Milligan, R.J. Chant, Comparison of in situ floc sizes from LISST-100 laser and a digital

floc camera. Journal of Coastal Research. Submitted to the Continental shelf research December, 2004. Lerczak, J., W.R. Geyer and R.J. Chant Mechanisms driving the time-dependent salt flux in a partially stratified estuary.

Submitted to the Journal of Physical Oceanography November 2004. Geyer, W.R. and R.J. Chant, Physical processes in the Hudson River, in The Hudson River Ecosystem. Levinton, J. S., (ed.) Oxford University Press, in preparation for publication in 2005.

Fugate, D.A. and R. J. Chant. 2005 Near bottom shear stresses in a small highly stratified estuary. J. Geophys. Res., C03022, doi:10.1029/2004JC002563 Glenn, S.M., R. Arnone, T. Bergman, P. Bissett, M. Crowley, J. Cullen, J. Gryzmski, D. Haidvogel, J. Kohut, M. Moline,

R. Sherrell, T. Song, R. Chant, O. Schofield, In Press, The Biogeochemical Impact of Summertime Coastal Upwelling In the Mid-Atlantic Bight J. Geophys. Res.

Moline, M. A., S. Blackwell, R. Chant, M. J. Oliver, T. Bergmann, S. lenn, and O. M. E. Schofield (2005), Episodic

physical forcing and the structure of phytoplankton communities in the coastal waters of New Jersey, J. Geophys. Res., 110, C12S05, doi:10.1029/2003JC001985.

Chant, R. J.; Glenn, Scott; Kohut, Josh 2004, Flow reversals during upwelling conditions on the New Jersey inner shelf

J. Geophys. Res., Vol. 109, No. C12, C12S03. 10.1029/2003JC001941 13 November 2004 Kohut, J.T, S.M. Glenn and R.J. Chant, 2004 "Seasonal current variability on the New Jersey inner Shelf" Journal of

Geophysical Research, 109: C07S07, doi 10.1029/2003JC001932, 2004

Chant, R. J. 2002. Secondary flows in a region of flow curvature: relationship with tidal forcing and river discharge. Journal of Geophysical Research. 10.1029/2001JC001082, 21 September.

Chant, R. J. 2001. Tidal and subtidal motion in a multiple inlet/bay system. Journal of Coastal Research. Special issue 31:102-114b

Chant, R. J. 2001. Evolution of near-inertial waves during an upwelling event on the New Jersey inner shelf. Journal of Physical Oceanography. 31:746-764.

Chant, R. J. and A. Stoner. 2001, Particle trapping in a stratified flood-dominated estuary. Journal of Marine Research. 59:29-51

Chant, R. J., C. Curran, K. Able, S. Glenn. 2000. Delivery of winter flounder (Pseudopleuronectes americanus) larvae to settlement habitats in coves near tidal inlets. Estuarine and coastal Shelf Science. 51:529-541.

Munchow, A., and R. J. Chant. 2000. Kinematics of inner shelf motion during the summer stratified season off New Jersey. Journal of Physical Oceanography. 30:247-268.

Chant, R. J. and R. E. Wilson. 2000. Internal hydraulics and mixing in a highly stratified estuary. Journal of Geophysical Research. 106:14215-14222.

Chant, R. J. and R. E. Wilson. 1997. Secondary circulation in a highly stratified estuary. Journal of Geophysical Research. 102:23207-23216.

ROBERT F. CHEN

Associate Professor Tel: (617)287-7491 University of Massachusetts Boston FAX: (617)287-7474 Environmental, Earth and Ocean Sciences E-Mail: bob.chen@umb.edu 100 Morrissey Boulevard Boston, MA 02125-3393 Date of Birth: January 8, 1965 Nationality: USA Place of Birth: Princeton, NJ Soc. Sec. No.: 563-31-4802 Education: Harvard University A.B. 1986 Chemistry and Physics UC San Diego Ph.D. 1992 Oceanography Research Interests: Chromophoric Dissolved Organic Matter in Estuaries, Organic

Geochemistry of Dissolved Organic Matter, Indicators of Environmental Health in Coastal Waters, Ocean and Environmental Science Education

Appointments Held Associate Professor EEOS, UMassBoston (Dept. name change) 2004-present Grad. Program Dir. ECOS, UMassBoston 2002-2004 Associate Professor ECOS, UMassBoston 1999-2004 Visiting Scholar Scripps Institution of Oceanography 1999-2000 ASEE Sabbat. Fellow SPAWAR, San Diego 1999-2000 Adjunct Scientist Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution 1997-2000 Assistant Professor ECOS, UMassBoston 1993-1999 Postdoctoral Fellow Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution 1992-1993 Teaching Experience Associate in Earth Science, Summer Program, UC San Diego (1990). Instructor, Oceanography, San Diego City College, (1991). Assistant & Associate Professor, Environmental Biogeochemistry (Spring, 2005), Organic Geochemistry (Spring, 2003), Analytical Techniques in Environmental Science, Teaching Environmental Science and Technology (Fall, 2003, 2004), Introduction to Oceanography, Introduction to Environmental Science (Spring, 2004), Environmental Science Content Institute (Summer, 2003, 2004), Integrating Ocean Science Research Into the Classroom (Summer, 2003, 2004) Synergistic Activities Co-PI, Boston Science Partnership (an NSF Math Science Partnership) Co-PI, New England Center for Ocean Science Education Excellence (www.necosee.net) PI, Watershed-Integrated Sciences Partnership (an NSF GK12 program; www.wisp.umb.edu) Member, ASLO Education and Human Resources Committee Board of Directors, Neponset River Watershed Association Reviewer, NASA Education Review Panel (2005) Member, Site Visit Team to Whitaker Science Center, Florida Gulf Coast University

Content expert, Improving Teaching Quality Program, 2003 Member, Outfall Monitoring Task Force, Massachusetts Water Resources Authority, 1998-2001 Chair, 5 special sessions at AGU and ASLO meetings Presenter, Center of Improvement of Teaching, UMassBoston, 1998, 2002, 2003 High School Science Day Presenter (1995-1999) Professional Organizations: American Geophysical Union American Society of Limnology and Oceanography American Chemical Society The Oceanography Society European Assoc. of Organic Geochemists National Science Teachers Association Awards: UMassBoston Outstanding Achievement Award for Overall Contributions in the Sciences (2005) Massachusetts Marine Educators Special Award (2005) UMassBoston Outstanding Achievement Award for Teaching in the Sciences (1999) Honorary Member of the Golden Key National Honor Society (1999) UMassBoston Outstanding Achievement Award for Research in the Sciences (1996) ONR Young Investigator Program Award (1997-2000) NSF Postdoctoral Fellowship in Earth Science (1992) Outstanding Student Paper (1992) Ocean Sciences meeting of the American Geophysical Union. Graduate Thesis Advisor: Prof. Jeffrey L. Bada Postdoctoral Advisor: Dr. Daniel J. Repeta Collaborators (within 48 months), Other Than Those Cited on Publications List: R. Chant (Rutgers U.), C. Levi (NEAq), B. Spitzer (NEAq), D. Smith (WHOI), A. Soto (Tufts U.), M. Decker (Boston Public Schools), C. Matsumoto (Educational Development Center) Advisor (last 3 years): Doctoral (5): Yixian Zhang (2003), Julie Callahan (2004), Ray Siegener, Kim Frashure, Wei

Huang Masters (6): Paul Whelan (2003), Liannea Litz (2005), Zhen Wang, Deborah Cobb, HelenMary

Hotz, Aurea Vasquez Selected Publications Chen, R.F. and Gardner, G.B., 2004. High resolution measurements of CDOM in the

Mississippi and Atchafalaya River plume regions. Mar. Chem., 89: 103-125. Vlahos, P., Chen, R.F., and Repeta, D.J., 2002. Fluxes of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in the

Mid-Atlantic Bight. Deep-Sea Research II, 49: 4369-4385. Chen, R.F., 1999. In situ fluorescence measurements in coastal waters. Org. Geochem., 30: 397-

409. Rudnick, S.M. and Chen, R.F., 1998. Laser-induced fluorescence of polycyclic aromatic

hydrocarbons (PAH) in the marine environment. Talanta, 47: 907-919. Chen, R.F. and Bada, J.L., 1992. The fluorescence of dissolved organic matter in seawater.

Marine Chemistry, 37: 191-221. Chen, R.F. and Frashure, K., 2004. Engaging Ocean Science Researchers and Middle School

Teachers In Excellent Ocean Science Curriculum Development: Ocean Science Education Institute (OSEI). AGU, San Francisco, Dec. 13-17.

G. Berneard GARDNER Research Associate Department of Environmental, Earth and Ocean Sciences University of Massachusetts at Boston 100 Morrissey Blvd. Boston, MA 02125 Soc. Sec. No.: 212-48-8041 Date of Birth: August 29, 1946 Place of Birth: Grand Rapids, MI Education: 1968 B.E.S. Engineering Physics, The Johns Hopkins University 1971 M.A. Oceanography, The Johns Hopkins University 1984 Ph.D. Geophysics/Oceanography, University of Washington Experience: 1977-1984 Pre-Doctoral Research Associate, University of Washington 1984-1990 Assistant Professor of Environmental Sciences, Environmental Sciences Program,

University of Massachusetts Boston 1990-Present Research Associate, Department of Environmental, Coastal and Ocean Sciences,

University of Massachusetts Boston Professional Societies: American Geophysical Union Estuarine Research Federation American Society of Limnology and Oceanography RESEARCH INTERESTS: Estuarine and coastal dynamics, Internal Hydraulic processes in natural flows, Interdisciplinary studies of marine systems, Transport of dissolved organic matter in coastal waters.

PUBLICATIONS and PRESENTATIONS : Gallagher, E.D., G.B. Gardner and P. Jumars, 1990. Competition among the pioneers in a seasonal

soft-bottom benthic succession: Field experiments and analysis of the Gilpin-Ayala competition model. Oecologia 83, 427-442.

Villareal, T.A., C. Pilskaln, M. Brzezinski, F. Lipschultz and G. B. Gardner, 1999. Upward

Oceanic Nitrate Transport by Migrating Diatom Mats, , Nature, 397, 423-425.

Gardner, G.B and Chen, R.F., High Resolution Measurements of Chromophoric Dissolved Organic Matter (Cdom) in the Mississippi River Plume,. American Society of Limnology and Oceanography 1999 Aquatic Sciences Meeting, Albuquerque, New Mexico, February, 2001.

Gardner, G.B. and R.F. Chen, Dynamics of Chromophoric Dissolved Organic Matter (CDOM) in

a Microestuary; 2002 Ocean Sciences Meeting of the American Geophysical Union, Honolulu, HI, February 2002.

Gardner, G.B. and R.F. Chen, Importance Of Salt Marshes As Sources Of CDOM In

Microestuaries, 2003 Aquatic Sciences Meeting of the American Society of Limnology and Oceanography, Salt Lake City, UT, February 2003.

Gardner, B, Peri, F, Chen, R.F., Rudnick, S, M, Zhang, Z, Peterson, J, Litz, L, Whelan, P, The

Integrated Coastal Observation System (Icos): Examples Of Observation Capabilities From Its Maiden Voyage In The Hudson River And New Jersey/New York Shelf, 2004 Ocean Research Conference of the American Society of Limnology and Oceanography and The Oceanography Society, Honolulu, Hawaii, February, 2004.

Gardner, G.B, R. F. Chen, and A..Berry, High-Resolution Measurements of Chromophoric

Dissolved Organic Matter (CDOM) in the Neponset River Estuary, Boston Harbor, MA, in press, Marine Chemistry.

Chen, R.F., Bissett, P., Coble, P., Conmy, R., Gardner, G.B., Moran, M.A., Wang X., Wells, M.L.,

Whelan, P, and Zepp, R.G., 2004. Chromophoric Dissolved Organic Matter (CDOM) Source Characterization in the Louisiana Bight, Marine Chemistry, 89, 1-4, 257-272.

Conmy, R.N., P. G. Coble, R. F. Chen, G.B. Gardner, Optical Properties of Colored Dissolved

Organic Matter in the Northern Gulf of Mexico, Marine Chemistry, 89, 1-4, 127-144. Hitchcock, G.L., Chen, R.F., Gardner, G.B. and Wiseman, W,J, Jr., A Lagrangian view of

fluorescent chromophoric dissolved organic matter distributions in the Mississippi River plume, Marine Chemistry, 89, 1-4, 225-239

.

McGillis CV – page 1 of 2

Curriculum Vitae – Wade R. McGillis

Education: 1994 Postdoctoral Scholar, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA. 1993 Ph.D., Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA. 1990 M.S., Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA. 1988 B.S., (magna cum laude), Mech. Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA.

Research Interests:

Surface momentum, heat, and gas exchange; coupled atmosphere-ocean processes; ocean, coastal, and river carbon dioxide transport; interfacial hydrodynamics and boundary layer turbulence.

Activities: Member of: the American Meteorological Society’s Boundary Layer Turbulence Committee; the AGU Air-Sea Interaction Committee; the International SOLAS Science Steering Committee; the United States SOLAS Advisory Group; Chair of the 2004 AMS Boundary Layer Turbulence Conference – Portland Maine; Chair of the International SOLAS Implementation 2; the World Climate Research Program’s Surface Fluxes; and Associate Editor for the Journal of Geophysical Research.

Experience: 2004 - Doherty Scientist, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, NY. 2004 - Associate Professor, Earth & Environmental Engineering, Columbia University, NY. 2000-2004 Associate Scientist, Applied Ocean Physics and Engineering (AOPE), Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI), Woods Hole, MA. 1996-2000 Assistant Scientist, AOPE, WHOI, Woods Hole, MA. 1994-1996 Postdoctoral Investigator, AOPE, WHOI, Woods Hole, MA. 1988-1993 Research Assistant, Department of Mech. Eng, University of California, Berkeley, CA. 1987-1993 Research Intern, Digital Equipment Corporation, Marlboro, MA and Palo Alto, CA. 1986-1987 Engineer, New England Power Company, Salem, MA.

5 Relevant Publications: McGillis, W., J. Edson, C. Zappa, S. McKenna, E. Terray, W. Drennan, M. Donelan, J. Hare, and

C. Fairall, M. D. DeGrandpre, R. Wanninkhof, and R. Feely, 2004. Air-sea CO2 fluxes in the Equatorial Pacific, J. Geophys. Res, Vol. 109, C08S02.

McGillis, W. R., J. B. Edson, J. E. Hare, and C. W. Fairall, 2001. Direct covariance air-sea CO2 fluxes. J. of Geophysical Research, Vol. 106, No. C8, 16,729-16,745.

McGillis, W.R., J.B. Edson, J.D. Ware, J.W.H. Dacey, J.E. Hare, C.W. Fairall, and R.Wanninkhof, 2001. Carbon dioxide flux techniques performed during GasEx-98. J. Marine Chemistry, 75, 267-280.

Fairall, C. W., J. E. Hare, J. B. Edson, and W. R. McGillis, 2000. Parameterization and micrometeorological measurements of air-sea gas transfer. Boundary-Layer MET, 96, 63-105.

Bock, E. J., T. Hara, N. M. Frew, and W. R McGillis, 1999. Relationship between air-sea gas transfer and short wind waves. J. of Geophysical Research, 104, C11, 25821-25831.

5 Other Publications: Ho, D., C. Zappa, W. McGillis, L. Bliven, J. Dacey, B. Ward, P. Schlosser, and M. Hendricks,

2004. Influence of rain on air-sea gas exchange: Lessons from a model ocean, J. Geophys. Res., July.

Zappa, Raymond, Terray, and McGillis, 2003. Variation in surface turbulence and the gas transfer velocity over a tidal cycle in a macro-tidal estuary, Estuaries, Vol. 26, No. 6, 1401-1415.

McGillis, W. R., J. W. H. Dacey, N. M. Frew, E. J. Bock, and B. K. Nelson, 2000. Water-air flux of dimethylsulfide. J. of Geophysical Research, Vol. 105, No. C1, 1187-1193.

McGillis CV – page 2 of 2

Wanninkhof, R., and W. R. McGillis, 1999. A cubic relationship between air-sea CO2 exchange and windspeed. Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 26, No. 13, 1889-1892.

McKenna, S. P. and W. R McGillis, 2002. Fundamental performance of particle image and particle tracking velocimetry techniques. Experiments in Fluids, 32, 106-115.

Advisors: Graduate Research Advisor: Professor Van P. Carey, University of California Berkeley. Postdoctoral Advisor: Dr. Erik J. Bock (deceased), Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution.

Honors, Awards, and Fellowships: 2005 Leverhulme Fellowship Award, University of East Anglia Visiting Fellowship, UK. 2004 Fellowship Award, Japanese Society for Promotion of Science, Kyoto University, Japan. 2003 Best Scientific Paper Award 2002, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 2002 Best Scientific Paper Award 2001, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 2001 Coastal Ocean Institute Fellow, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution. 1998 Fellow, NOAA/U. of Miami Cooperative Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Studies. 1997 Francis Ogilvie Young Investigator, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MA. 1993 Postdoctoral Scholar Fellowship, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, MA. 1987 Joseph Ferretti Academic Excellence Fellowship, Northeastern University, MA. Synergistic Activities: McGillis is dedicated to interdisciplinary science and engineering. His focus is on understanding surface processes and the coupling between aqueous and atmospheric systems. In particular, the role of air-sea CO2 exchange on local and global carbon cycles. McGillis is a member of the Geochemistry Division at Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory and also resides in the Earth and Environmental Engineering Department at Columbia University.

Professional Societies: American Geophysical Union; American Meteorological Society; American Society of Mechanical Engineers; American Physical Society.

Reviewer: Journal of Geophysical Research – Oceans. Journal of Geophysical Research – Atmospheres. Journal of Heat Transfer. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. Journal of Deep Sea Research. Geophysical Research Letters. National Science Foundation, USA. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, USA. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council, Canada. Natural Environment Research Council, United Kingdom. National Research Foundation, South Africa.

Advising and Mentorship: 4 Postdoctoral Investigators; 4 Ph.D Students; 1 Master’s Student; 8 Undergraduate Fellows.

Collaborators In the Last Five Years: William Asher, APL/UW; James Edson, WHOI; Kerry Emanuel, MIT; John Dacey, WHOI; Chris Fairall, ETL/NOAA; Richard Feely, PMEL/NOAA; Nelson Frew, WHOI; Tetsu Hara, URI; Jeffrey Hare, ETL/NOAA; David Ho, LDEO; Mike DeGrandpre, UM; Mark Donelan, RSMAS/UM; William Drennan, RSMAS/UM; Andrew Jessup, APL/UW; Peter Raymond, Yale; Rik Wanninkhof, AOML/NOAA.

Raymond CV – page 1 of 2

Peter A. Raymond Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies

Yale University New Haven, CT 06511

Education B.S. Environmental Chemistry, Marist College 1993 Ph.D., Biogeochemistry, College of William & Mary 1999 Research interests Inorganic carbon cycling and air-sea exchange Isotope geochemistry of riverine, estuarine, and oceanic organic matter Organic carbon cycling in marshes, rivers, estuaries, and oceans Professional Experience 2002-present, Assistant Professor, Yale University 2001-2002, Postdoctoral Scientist (Dr. W. McGillis advisor), Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution 1999-2001, Postdoctoral Scientist (Dr. J. Hobbie advisor), Marine Biological Laboratory 1998-1999, Participating Scientist, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 1995-1997, Graduate Research Assistant for Dr. James Bauer, College of William and Mary 1993-1995, Research Assistant for Dr. J. Cole, Institute of Ecosystem Studies. 5 Relevant Publications: Raymond P.A., and J.J. Cole. 2003. Increase in the export of alkalinity from North America’s

largest river. Science 301:56-59 Raymond P.A., and C. Hopkinson. 2003. Ecosystem modulation of dissolved carbon age in

a temperate marsh dominated estuary. Ecosystems. 6: 694-705 Raymond P.A., J. E. Bauer, J.J. Cole. 2000. Atmospheric CO2 evasion, dissolved inorganic carbon

production, and net heterotrophy in the York River Estuary, Limnol. Oceanogr. 45: 1707-1717. Raymond P.A., J. E. Bauer. 2001. Riverine export of aged terrestrial organic matter to the North Atlantic

Ocean. Nature. 409: 497-500. Raymond P.A., J. E. Bauer. 2001. DOC cycling in a temperate estuary: A mass balance approach using

natural 14C and 13C Isotopes. Limnol. Oceanogr. 46: 655-657. 5 Other Publications: Raymond, P.A. et al., 2004. Controls on the variability of organic matter and dissolved inorganic

carbon age in Northeast United States rivers. Mar. Chem., 92 353-366 Raymond P.A., J. E. Bauer. 2001.Use of 14C and 13C natural abundances for evaluating riverine, estuarine,

and coastal DOC and POC sources and cycling: Review and Synthesis. Org. Geochem. 32: 469-485.

Raymond P.A., J. E. Bauer. 2000. Bacterial utilization and transport of DOC in a temperate estuary: implications for export to the coastal ocean. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 22:1-12.

Raymond P.A., J.J. Cole. 2001. Gas exchange in rivers and estuaries: choosing a gas transfer velocity. Estuaries 24:269-274.

Caraco, N., J.J. Cole, P.A. Raymond, D.L. Strayer, M.L. Pace, S. Findlay, D. Fischer. 1997. Zebra mussel invasion in a large, turbid river: Phytoplankton response to increased grazing. Ecology 78: 588-602.

Graduate School Advisors (College of William and Mary): James Bauer (major), Hugh Ducklow, Jon Cole, Iris Anderson, Ken Moore.

Raymond CV – page 2 of 2

Postdoctoral Advisors: John Hobbie (MBL), Charles Hopkinson (MBL), Wade McGillis (WHOI). Collaborators: James Bauer (VIMS), Nina Caraco (IES), Jon Cole (IES), Byron Crump (MBL), Charles Hopkinson (MBL), Wade McGillis (WHOI), J. Vallino (MBL), Chris Zappa (WHOI), Joseph Boyer (FIU) Synergistic Activities: Reviewing Efforts- Nature, Limnology and Oceanography, Marine Chemistry, Deep-Sea Research II, Biological Bulletin, Archiv fuer Hydrobiolobie, Estuaries, Proceedings for the Natural Academy of Sciences, Aquatic Microbial Ecology, Estuarine, Coastal, & Shelf Science. Co-Chair session at INQUA Congress Reno 23 - 31 July 2003, Fossil carbon in modern environments. Teaching efforts at Yale University include a course in Ecosystem Science and The Science and Policy of Eutrophication. Review Panel for NSF IGERT pre-proposals. International Scientific Committee for the 37th International Leige Colloquium on Ocean Dynamics.

RESUME: Louis Goodman ADDRESS: 161 Narragansett Blvd Telephone: (H) 401 683 2004 Portsmouth, RI 02871 (W) 508 910 6375 E-Mail (W) lgoodman@umassd.edu E-Mail (H) malgood@attbi.com EDUCATION: Ph.D. Physics, 1971, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pa. 1 Year Graduate Research Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y. MS Physics, 1969, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pa. BS. Physics, 1967, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pa. EXPERIENCE: July 2001- Technical Director and Professor, School of Marine Science and Technology (SMAST) Present and Intercampus Graduate School, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth

I am responsible for developing, implementing and managing the research programs at SMAST and coordinating research programs within the new Intercampus Graduate School of Marine Science and Technology of the University of Massachusetts. During the short period in which I have been the technical director I have obtained as a PI grant support in excess of 1 M.

June 93 - Program Director, Physical Oceanography Program June 2001 Office of Naval Research, Arlington, Va. Responsible for the management and execution of the Physical Oceanography Program, which is

the single largest basic research program in the navy with a budget of $ 16 M and 130contractors Also responsible for management and execution of the applied research program “ocean sensors”. The physical oceanography program under my leadership successfully reorganized into a more littoral focus and developed and received funding for four new initiatives in the past three years. As a part of the ONR “ROPO” program I am also involved in conducting my own research on “Turbulence Measurements from an AUV”.

June 88 - Chief Scientist, Head, Ocean Acoustics Turbulence Study (OATS) June 93 Naval Undersea Warfare Center , Newport, R.I. 02841. Developed OATS program. Principle Investigator of research projects: (1) Scattering from Ocean Microstructure; (2) Remote Acoustics Techniques to observe Turbulence. Funding level $ 620 K per year, largest basic research (6.1) program at NUWC; staff of 7 scientists and engineers. Sept. 89 - Adjunct Professor: Physics Department, University of Rhode Island, May 93 Graduate and undergraduate courses in ocean physics, Ph.D. and Master's candidate thesis advisor. Sept. 84 - Adjunct Faculty, University of Massachusetts, Dartmouth, North Dartmouth, Mass. Sept. 91 Undergraduate Electrical Engineering, Graduate courses in ocean acoustics and physical oceanography. Sept. 72 - Adjunct Professor Roger Williams College, Bristol Rhode Island. Undergraduate Sept 89 Physics and Oceanography Courses. Sept. 83 - Senior Staff Scientist, Naval Underwater Systems Center, Newport, R.I. 02841. June 88 Coordinate, review, and initiate new 6.1 laboratory research. Develop and had successfully funded 11 new basic research program jointly supported with ONR. Conduct personal research in physical oceanography and ocean acoustics. Nov. 78 - Program Director, Physical Oceanography Program, Office of Naval Research,

Sept. 83 Arlington, Va. Responsible for the Management of the Physical Oceanography Program. Duties included supervision of two scientific officers and 101 contractors. Program grew during my tenure from $9.3M to

Formulation and execution of the grants program. Successfully developed 5 new Accelerated Research Options. Won the naval Civilian Meritorious award for performance.

Sept. 71 - Research Physicist , Oceanography Group, Naval Underwater Systems Center. Nov. 78 Principle Investigator of basic and applied research projects in physical oceanography,

underwater acoustics, and fluid dynamics. Participated in 8 major oceanographic cruises, 6 of which as chief scientist. Ran NUSC fluid turbulence wind tunnel program. Work resulted in refereed publications in fluid dynamics, physical oceanography, and underwater acoustics. Sept. 66 - Instructor, Physics Department, Drexel University, Sept. 71 Philadelphia, Pa. All levels of undergraduate physics. Sept. 69 - Research Assistant, Physics Department, Drexel University, Sept. 71 Philadelphia. Research in high energy physics and fluid turbulence. June 68 - Teaching Assistant, Physics Department, Drexel University, Sept. 69 Philadelphia, Pa. Undergraduate physics courses. Sept. 67 - Teaching Assistant, Physics Department, Cornell University, June 68 Ithaca, N.Y. Undergraduate physics courses. Jan 64 - Engineering Trainee, Naval Air Development Center, June 65 Warminster, Pa. ('Cooperative' job while undergraduate) June 62 - Engineering Trainee, Philadelphia Naval Shipyard, Jan 64 Philadelphia, Pa. ('Cooperative' job while undergraduate) Ph.D. THESIS: Self-Similarity for the Global Dynamics of Clear Air Turbulence. AWARDS: Navy Civilian Meritorious Award (for period of ONR service from Nov. 78 to Sept. 83) NUWC Sustained Superior Accomplishment Award (Dec. 74 to Dec. 77) 14 MPS Outstanding Awards (FY 78 to FY 01) 14 NUWC Special Achievements Awards NUWC Newport “Excellence in Science” Award, FY 91 PATENTS: 1. Turbulence Technique, Navy Case Number 72009, June 5 1991 PUBLICATIONS: 1. Comments on Hadron Mass Dependence in Quark Models, Nuovo Cimento, 68, 605, (1970) 2.Rigorous Bounds on the Vacuum Energy for a Fourth Power Scalar Field Cut-Off Theory, Nuovo Cimento,72, July 1971

3. Self-Similar Statistical Theory for the Global Dynamics of Clear Air Turbulence. Drexel University Press, June 1972. 4. Experiments Concerning Pressure Distribution and Deformation Theory in the NUSC Wind Tunnel, TM 4002-72 5. The Relationship of Dynamic Pressure Fluctuations to Velocity Fluctuations, NUSC TR 4198, 1973. 6. The Deformation of a Turbulent Field by an Inviscid Mean Fluid Motion with Application to Flow around a Body, NUSC TR 4211, 1974 7. On the Pressure Induced by a Stagnating Turbulent Field, Physics of Fluids, Vol. 19, No 17 1976 8. Diffusion Loss in a Stratified Sound Channel, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., Vol. 60, No. 5,1976. 9. COBLAMED '76 Tethered Buoy Experiment, NUSC TM 77-2984,1977. 10.On the Generation of Internal Waves by Advecting Atmospheric Fields, J. Geophys. Res., Vol. 82, No. 12, 1977. 11.Scattering from the Volume Variability of an Inhomogeneous Medium, NUSC TM77-2158, 1977. 12.On the Time Dependence of a Scalar Undergoing Advection, J. PHYS. Oceanogr., Vol. 8, No.5, Sept. 1978. 13.Massachusetts Bay Internal Wave Experiment, NUSC TD 5684 1979 14. An Assessment of Upper Ocean Variability, Naval Research Review, 1979 15. Assessment of Microstructure Research, Office of Naval Research/ University of British Columbia joint Report, August 1980 16. Biennial Physical Oceanography Program Overview, ONR Report, Sept. 1981 17. Scattering from Volume variability, J. of Geophys. Res. Vol. 86,No. 25,1981 18.On the Use of High frequency Acoustics for the Study of Internal Waves and Ocean Microstructure, NUSC Tech Report, Feb. 1982 19. Biennial Physical Oceanography Overview, ONR Report, Sept. 1983 20. Use of High Frequency Random Doppler Techniques to Infer Ocean Microstructure, NUSC TD, July 1985 21. Interaction of Surface and Internal waves NUSC TM 86 -1135, 22. Doppler Statistics of Ocean Velocity Variability, NUSC TR 6734, 1 Nov. 1988 22. Doppler Statistics of Ocean Microstructure, 2nd Annual Independent Navy Symposium, Silver Spring Md., July 1989 23. Vertical Motion of Neutrally Buoyant Floats, J. Ocean and Atmos. Techn., Vol. 7, No. 1, Feb. 1990 24. Acoustic Scattering From Ocean Microstructure, Journ. Geophysical Research, Vol. 95, No. C7, July 1990 25. Ocean Acoustics Turbulence Study: Acoustic Scattering from a Buoyant Axisymmetric Plume, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 91 (6) June 1992 26. Acoustic Characterization and Discriminatiion of Marine Zooplankton and Turbulence , Journal

of Marine Res, May 1994 27. Acoustic Scattering from a Thermally driven buoyant Plume, J. Acoust. Soc., 100, Sept. 1996 28. Microstructure Sensors in the Ocean, ONR Report, Coedited with Agrawal and Williams, October 1996 29 . Acoustic scattering from a thermally driven buoyant plume revisited ( In review J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 2002,with J. Oeschger) 30 Propagation of Sound through Ocean Internal Waves (Cambridge University Press , to be published 2002, coeditor with J. Simmen) 31 Turbulence Measurements from an AUV ( with E. Levine, to be submitted to JPO, winter/spring 2002/2003) PROFESSIONAL SOCIETY PRESENTATIONS: 1. Generation of Internal Waves by Advecting Pressure Fields- Theory and Experiment, American Geophysical Union, Dec. 1974. 2. On the Generation of Internal Waves by Advecting Wind Velocity Fields, American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C. June 1975 3.On the Generation of Internal Waves by Advecting Atmospheric Fields, International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics, Grenoble France, Aug. 1975 4. Numerical Evaluation of the generation of Internal Waves by Advecting Atmospheric Fields, American Geophysical Union, San Francisco, Dec. 1975 5.On the Generation of Internal Waves by Advecting Atmospheric Fields, American Meteorological Society Conference on Atmospheric and Oceanic Interactions, Seattle Wa., March 1976. 6.On the Role of Advection in Inducing Time Variability in Oceanographic Scalars, American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C. June 1976 7.Diffusion Loss in a Stratified Sound Channel, American Acoustical Society, Washington, D.C. June 1976 8. NUSC Tethered Buoy Experiment- COBLAMED 76, American Geophysical Union, San Francisco, Ca. Dec. 1976. 9. On the Upper Ocean Internal Waves Observed during COBLAMED-69,American Geophysical Union, San Francisco, Ca. Dec. 1977 10. Use of Empirical Orthogonal Functions for Analyzing Upper Ocean Variability, American Geophysical Union, Miami Fl., April 1978 11.Acoustic Scattering from Internal Waves and Microstructure, American Geophysical Union, San Francisco, Ca. Dec. 1980 12. New Tools and Techniques for Very near Surface Open Ocean Measurements, ONR Conference on Air Sea Interaction, Boulder Co., Feb. 1983. 13. On the Measurement of Ocean Microstructure by Random Doppler Techniques, NUSC Conference on Ocean Microstructure, June 1985. 14. Response Characteristics of Isopycnal Floats, American Geophysical Union, San Francisco, Ca. Dec. 1986

15. On the Dynamic Response of Freely Drifting Floats, American Geophysical Union, New Orleans, La., Jan 1988 16. Use of High Frequency Acoustic Techniques to Observe Ocean Variability, ONR special session on biology/physical coupling, at Oceanography Society, Monterey , Ca., Aug. 1989 17. Acoustic Scattering from Ocean Microstructure, Acoustical Society of America, Penn State University, State College Pa., May 1990 18. Acoustic Scattering from Temperature Turbulence: Theory and Laboratory Results, Woods Hole Oceanographic Seminar Series, October 1990. 19. Ocean Acoustics Turbulence Study (OATS), Theory and Laboratory Results, College of Marine Studies Seminar Series, University of Delaware, April 1991.

20. Ocean Acoustics Turbulence Study (OATS), Acoustical Society of America, Baltimore Maryland, May 1991. 21. Joint IR/ONR Program: Ocean Acoustics Turbulence Study (OATS), 4th Annual Independent Navy IR/IED Symposium, Johns Hopkins University, Columbia, MD June 1991. 22. Acoustic Scattering from Temperature Microstructure, international Association for the Advancement of the Physical Sciences of the Ocean, Vienna Austria, August 1991. 23. Acoustic Scattering from a Buoyant Plume, Invited Presentation to a Special Session on Small Scale Physical Structure, Acoustical Society of America, Houston Texas, November 1991 (Note: served as session chairman). 24. Acoustic Scattering from Fluid Turbulence, Acoustical Society of America, Salt Lake City Utah, May 1992. 25. Application of the Vector Bragg Scattering Wave Number Condition to Obtaining Turbulent Field Variables, Acoustical Society of America, New Orleans, Louisiana, October 1992. 26. Chairman Workshop of Ocean Microstructure Sensors, Timberline Lodge, Oct 1996 27. Chairman: Panel on the role of ocean processes in Mixed Layer modeless, Ocean Sciences Meeting, February 1998, San Diego Ca.

28. Convenor and Chairman: ONR Workshop: Ocean Internal Solitary Waves, University Of Victoria, October 1998

2299.. Convenor and Chairman: ONR Workshop: Coupled Boundary layer Air-Sea Transfer DRI, Airlie House, Warrenton, VA., January 2001

30. Turbulent Budgets and Model/Data Comparison for AUV-based Sampling in the FRONT Coastal Front,Ocean Science Meeting of the American geophysical Union, Honolulu, Hawaii, February 2002

Levine CV – page 1 of 2

EDWARD R. LEVINE NUWC, Newport, Code 8211, Newport R. I., 02841 (401) 832-4772; (401) 832-2146 (fax), levineer@.npt.nuwc.navy.mil Education: Ph.D. 1976, M.S. 1972, GSO/URI, Physical Oceanography B.S. (honors) 1968, C.C.N.Y., Meteorology/Oceanography Professional History: Senior Scientist (Oceanographer), NUWC, 1976-present Marine Research Associate, GSO/URI, 1974-76, Research Assistant, 1972-74 EPA Traineeship, GSO/URI 1970-72 Research Assistant, WHOI 1969-70 Professional Affiliations: Adjunct Professor, Visiting Scholar, Univ. Mass Dartmouth, SMAST, 2002- The Oceanography Society, American Geophysical Union, American Meteorological Society, Sigma Xi Adjunct Professor, GSO/URI, 1984-86; Visiting Scientist, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, 1982 U. S. Rep., TTCP Environmental Acoustics Specialists Group, 1992 -95 U. S. Rep, U. S./U. K. Meeting on Cooperation for Cleaner Seas (NSF/MTD) U. S. Navy Partner, National Ocean Partnership Prog., Univ. of Conn., Harvard U., and Rutgers U. groups Collaborating Scientists Over Last 48 Months: Lou Goodman, UMass Dartmouth, Percy Donaghay URI, Ben Cray, NUWC, Graduate Students: Chris Luebke (MS) Selected Publications: Goodman, L., .E. R. Levine, and R. Lueck, 2005: On closing the turbulent kinetic energy budget from an AUV, J Atmos. Ocean. Technol., submitted 12/04. Wasko, J, B. Cray, E. Levine, J. Kelly, 2005: A shallow water observatory for the development of emerging acoustic and light-based underwater security technologies., Proceed, SPIE, Orlando, FL, Feb 2005. Levine, E. R., L. Goodman, and R. G. Lueck, 2004: Turbulence estimates near coastal fronts at the entrance to Long Island Sound, Ocean Sciences Meeting, Portland Oregon, Jan 2004. Levine, E. R., L. Goodman, R. G. Lueck, C. A. Edwards, and J. O’Donnell, 2003: Turbulence estimates in a region of coastal fronts, IUGG., Sapporo, Japan, spec. sess. Mixing and its Parameterization in Geophysical Fluids. Levine, E. R., L. Goodman, and R. G. Lueck, 2003: Turbulence characterization of the coastal fronts offshore of Long Island Sound in the FRONT region, J. Geophys. Res., to be submitted 7/05. Goodman, L., and Levine, E. R., 2003: Use of the turbulent kinetic energy and scalar variance budgets to obtain directly eddy viscosity and diffusivity from AUV turbulence measurements. ‘Aha Huliko’a Workshop, Proceed., 1/2003 (invited) Levine, E. R., L. Goodman, R. Lueck, and C. Edwards, 2002: Balancing Turbulent Energy Budgets and Model Verification with AUV-Based Sampling in the FRONT Coastal Front. EOS, Trans. AGU, 83(4), Ocean Sci. Meet..Supple., OS41N-10. Levine, E. R., R. Lueck, R. Shell, and P. Licis: 2001: AUV-based turbulence characterization for coastal ocean predictive networks. 5th Symp. Integ. Observ. Syst., NOPP Spec. Sess., 81st An. Meet. AMS, Albuq, N. M., Jan 2001. Levine, E. R., R. G. Lueck, R. R. Shell, and P. Licis: 2000: Coastal turbulence estimates in ocean modeling and observational studies near LEO-15. EOS, Trans. AGU, 80, 49, OS117. 2000 Ocean Sciences Meet., San Ant., TX.

Levine, E.R, and R.G. Lueck, 1999: Turbulence measurements from an autonomous underwater vehicle. J Atmos. Oceanic Technol., Special Issue on Turbulence in the Ocean, 16, 11, part 1, 1533-1544. Glenn, S. M., D. B. Haidvogel, O. M. E. Scofield, C J. von Alt, and E. R. Levine, 1998: Coastal Predictive Skill Experiments. Sea Technology, April 1998, 66-72. Levine, E. R., D. Connors, R. Shell and R. Hanson, 1997: Autonomous Underwater Vehicle-based hydrographic sampling. J Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 14, 6, 1444-1454.

Levine CV – page 2 of 2

Levine, E. R., R. G. Lueck, P. L. Donaghay, D. N. Connors, T. Gagliardi, R. Hanson, and R. Shell, 1996: Turbulence and optics sampling with an autonomous underwater vehicle. Proceed., IEEE AUST, Monterey , CA June 1996. Levine, E. R., R. G. Lueck, 1996: Coastal turbulence measurements with an autonomous underwater vehicle. Proceed., ONR Workshop on Microstructure Measurements in the Ocean, Oct 96, Mt. Hood, Ore., 183-190. Levine, E. R., D. Connors, R. Shell, T.Gagliardi, and R. Hanson, 1995: Oceanographic Mapping With The U. S. Navy's Large Diameter UUV, Sea Technology , June 1995 Bales, J. W. and E. R. Levine, 1994: Sensors for oceanographic applications of AUVs, Proceedings, 1994 National Symp. for the Assoc. of Unmanned Underwater Vehicles (AUVS94), Detroit MI, May 23-24, 1994, 439-446. .Levine, E, R., A. Shein, and J. Kloske, 1994: Simulation of UUV environmental sampling in modeled ocean frontal zones. Proc., Symp. AUV Tech. (AUV94), IEEE Ocean. Eng. Soc., Cambridge Ma., July 19-20 1994, 439-442. Hitchcock, G., H., T. Rossby, J. Lillibridge, E. R. Levine, D. N. Connors, Y. Borseim, M. Mork, E. Lessard, 1994: Signatures of stirring and mixing at the Northern edge of the Gulf Stream. J. Mar. Res., 52, 797-836. Levine, E R, D N Connors, R N Carpenter, J G Kelly and R R Shell, 1993: Acoustic backscatter measurements on the U. S. Continental Shelf. Acoustic Mapping and Classification of the Seabed, Proceed. Inst. of Acoust., vol15, part 2, 477. Churchill. J.H., E.R. Levine, D. N. Connors, and P.C. Cornillon, 1993: Mixing of Shelf, slope, and Gulf Stream Water on the Continental Shelf of the Mid-Atlantic Bight. Deep- Sea Research. I, Vol. 40, No. 5, 1063-1085. Connors, D.N., E.R. Levine, and R.R. Shell, 1990: A small-scale under-ice morphology study in the high Arctic, Sea Ice Properties and Processes, CRRL Monograph 90-1, 145-151. Goodman, L., and E.R. Levine,1990. On the vertical response of neutrally buoyant floats. J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech.,7,1,38-49. D.N. Connors, E.R. Levine, and R.R. Shell,1989. Morphology of a multi-year ice ridge in the High Arctic. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 55, 8, 1123-1128. Levine, E.R., D.N. Connors, P.C. Cornillon, and H.T. Rossby, 1986: Gulf Stream kinematics along an isopycnal float trajectory. J. Phys. Ocean., 16,7,318-328 Rossby, H.T., E.R. Levine, and D.N. Connors, 1984: The isopycnal Swallow float: A simple device for tagging water parcels in the ocean. Progress in Oceanography, 14, Swallow Anniversary Volume, 511-526. Levine, E.R., and W.B. White, 1983: Bathymetric influences upon the character of North Pacific Fronts, 1976-80. J. Geophys. Res, 88, C14, 9617-9625. Levine, E.R. and J.M. Bergin, 1983: Temperature and current variability of a Gulf Stream meander off Onslow Bay, August 1977. J. Geophys. Res., 88, C8, 4663-4671. Levine, E.R. and W.B. White,1981: Large-scale synoptic thermal fronts in the mid-latitude North Pacific, 1976-78. J. Geophys. Res., 86, C7, 6567-6579. Levine, E.R., and W.B. White, 1981: Seasonal variability of long-range acoustic propagation through the Subarctic Front in the Eastern North Pacific. Navy Journal of Underwater Acoustics, 31,1,171-181. Goodman,L. and E..R. Levine, 1977. On the generation of internal waves by advecting atmospheric fields. J. Geophys. Res., 82, 12, 1711-1717. Levine, E.R. and K.E. Kenyon, 1974: The tidal energetics of Narragansett Bay, R.I., J. Geophys. Res., 80,12, 1683-1688.

Levine, E.R. and W.B. White, 1972: Thermal Frontal Zones in the Eastern Mediterranean. J. Geophys. Res., 77,6 1086. Patent: A rigid sting extension for ocean turbulence measurement from an UUV, Patent number U.S. 6,674,691 B1, 1/ 2004.