open foris initiative.ppt - world...
TRANSCRIPT
Open Foris InitiativeOpen-source Tools for National Forest Monitoring and Assessment
FAO-Finland Forestry ProgrammeSustainable Forest Management in a Changing Climate
Forestry Departmenty p
FAO Finland Forestry ProgrammeFAO-Finland Forestry Programme
• Four year program in FAO HQ and pilot countries (2009-2013)
• Promotes SFM through development of innovative methods, tools and technology
• Builds on FAO’s capacity to implement and support NFMA and MRV• Builds on FAO s capacity to implement and support NFMA and MRV
• Hands-on approach motivating and supporting full country engagement
• Supports implementation of NFMA and MRV in Tanzania, Ecuador, Vietnam, Zambia, Peru
$ $ $• Initial budget: $20M HQ, $2M Zambia, $5M Tanzania
FAO Finland Forestry ProgrammeFCPF, FIP
UN REDD Finland, JICA, USFS,
FAO-Finland Forestry Programme
Component 2NFP
(National Forest Programs)
Component 3SFM
Tools and Guidelines for Sustainable Forest Management
Component 1NFMA
(National Forest Monitoring Assessment)
UN REDD , , ,GEO/FCT, Google, other partners.
Sustainable Forest ManagementMonitoring Assessment)
Contribution to SFM:
C.C. adaptation and Reliable and U d t d
Better DECISI B tt
Information
pmitigation
Enhance rural livelihoods Countries’ sustainable
development & poverty reduction
Updated INFORMATION ON FOREST RESOURCES
DECISION MAKING, POLICIES,
Better FOREST MANAGE
Component 4E h d t i ’ it t ti i t i i t ti l
needs reductionSTRATEGIES and PLANNING
MENT
Enhanced countries’ capacity to participate in international processes and meet International reporting commitments
Component 1 National Forest Monitoring and
1 NFMA 2: NFP 3: SFM
Tool and method development for NFMA/MRV
Component 1. National Forest Monitoring and Assessment (NFMA)
Tool and method development for NFMA/MRV
• Inventory planning/design toolsL l l l i i / th d l• Local level socio-economic/governance methodology
• Database, statistical analysis, modeling• RS tools (multi-source inventory)( y)• Field inventories & RS for REDD+ MRV• FRA special studies, NFMA development• Quality assurance & managementQuality assurance & management
UN REDD+ MRVUN REDD+ MRV
• Reducing Emissions from Deforestation Forest Degradation
• Interagency initiative between FAO, UNDP, UNEP with core secretariat in Genevacore secretariat in Geneva
• Measurement, Reporting and Verification• FAO Forestry builds capacity for readiness and y p y
supports implementation• Livelihoods, biodiversity and emissions reduction• Pilots: DRC, Tanzania, Zambia, Indonesia, PNG, Viet
Nam, Bolivia, Panama, Paraguay. 16 more on the way.
NFMA/MRV I f ti S tNFMA/MRV Information SystemsLessons Learned
• Database development, field data processing & calculation of results most common bottlenecksN t d d t f t l i t t ti• No standard set of tools exists; current options:
1. Build country-specific ad-hoc solutions: not institutionalized, documented and/or shareddocumented and/or shared
2. Buy proprietary software and tools and pay for ongoing support (vendor lock-in)
Scaling UpGrowing demand for timely, accurate information on state of forests.
Scaling Up
Existing NFMA countries
9 countries
FCPF35 countriesFAO FIN
5 il t
UN REDD 25 countries
5 pilot countries
25 countries
FAO GTZCentral America
New NFMA countriesRSA ???
8 countries
NFMA/MRV I f ti S tNFMA/MRV Information SystemsObjectives
Innovative use of technology to enable:• Country readiness – ability to produce timely, reliable
i f ti f ti l li d d i i ki dinformation for national policy and decision making and int’l reporting (incl. REDD+)
• Sustainable capacity –country ownership ofSustainable capacity country ownership of knowledge and technology, independently without outside supportS l bl h l li d i ddi i l• Scalable approach – tools applied in additional countries without developer intervention, contributing to FAO’s readiness to implement NFMA and MRV p
NFMA/MRV Information Systems
Software, hardware and methods covering all phases of NFMA and
NFMA/MRV Information Systems
MRV planning, execution and results generation:
Design & Pl i
Data DisseminationPlanningSampling design
Definition of variablesField form preparationField computer setupField map production
Data CollectionData entry from paper
Field computer software
ProcessingData validation & QA
Result calculation & analysisGIS/RS analysis
DisseminationReport generation
Online data and mapsIntegration w/other systems
NFMA/MRV I f ti S tNFMA/MRV Information SystemsLessons Learned
• Database development, field data processing & calculation of results most common bottlenecksN t d d t f t l i t t ti• No standard set of tools exists; current options:
1. Build country-specific ad-hoc solutions: not institutionalized, documented and/or shareddocumented and/or shared
2. Buy proprietary software and tools and pay for ongoing support (vendor lock-in)
NFMA/MRV I f ti S t
Diff t t l d di t i h
NFMA/MRV Information SystemsLessons Learned (cont.)
• Different tools and audiences at various phases• Country information needs vary• Country IT capacity varies greatly• Many requirements not yet known/defined• Cookie-cutter solutions don’t always work
NFMA/MRV IS Capacity BuildingNFMA/MRV IS Capacity BuildingMethod 1: Transfer knowledge
Level of Expertise; Actual vs Required
89
10
eLevel of Expertise; Actual vs. Required
345678
l of E
xper
tise
RequiredActual
0123
Leve
eling sig
n
ment
ation
eling
ation
ation
Data m
odel
Sampli
ng de
sData
man
agem
Impu
tat
Model
Report
prep
arati
Web diss
emina
t
Processs
NFMA/MRV IS Capacity BuildingNFMA/MRV IS Capacity BuildingMethod 1: Transfer knowledge
Level of Expertise; Actual vs Required
89
10
Level of Expertise; Actual vs. Required
45678
of E
xper
tise
RequiredActual
0123
Leve
l
ling ign men
t
tion ling
tion
tion
Data m
odeli
nSam
pling
desig
Data m
anag
eme
Impu
tatio
Modelin
Report
prep
aratio
Web diss
emina
tio
Processs
NFMA/MRV IS Capacity BuildingNFMA/MRV IS Capacity BuildingMethod 2: Provide better tools
Level of Expertise; Actual vs Required
89
10
eLevel of Expertise; Actual vs. Required
345678
l of E
xper
tise
RequiredActual
0123
Leve
eling sig
n
ment
ation
eling
ation
ation
Data m
odel
Sampli
ng de
sData
man
agem
Impu
tat
Model
Report
prep
arati
Web diss
emina
t
Processs
NFMA/MRV IS Capacity Building
Level of Expertise; Actual vs Required
NFMA/MRV IS Capacity BuildingMethod 2: Provide better tools
89
10
e
Level of Expertise; Actual vs. Required
45678
of E
xper
tise
RequiredActual
0123
Leve
l
eling sig
n
ment
tion ling
tion
tion
Data m
odeli
Sampli
ng de
sigData
man
agem
eIm
putat
io
Modelin
Report
prep
aratio
Web diss
emina
tio
Processs
NFMA/MRV IS Capacity BuildingNFMA/MRV IS Capacity BuildingOur approach: DO BOTH!
Level of Expertise; Actual vs Required
89
10
eLevel of Expertise; Actual vs. Required
345678
l of E
xper
tise
RequiredActual
0123
Leve
eling sig
n
ment
ation
eling
ation
ation
Data m
odel
Sampli
ng de
sData
man
agem
Impu
tat
Model
Report
prep
arati
Web diss
emina
t
Processs
NFMA/MRV IS Capacity Building
Level of Expertise; Actual vs Required
NFMA/MRV IS Capacity BuildingOur approach: DO BOTH!
89
10
eLevel of Expertise; Actual vs. Required
345678
el o
f Exp
ertis
e
RequiredActual
0123
Leve
delin
g
esign
emen
t
tation
delin
g
ation
ation
Data m
ode
Sampli
ng de
sData
man
agem
Impu
ta
Mode
Report
prep
arat
Web diss
emina
PProcesss
Open Foris Initiati eOpen Foris Initiative• Open-source standards-based set ofOpen-source, standards-based set of
flexible tools for forest monitoring
What it is not:A i l il t l li ti (• A single silo-style application (program, database, etc.)
• A one-size fits all solution
Open Foris Initiative
• Countries and partners free to use and modify
Why Open Source?
Countries and partners free to use and modify software to meet requirements; self-sufficiency
• Transparent processes, reproducible resultsp p , p• Promotes cross-fertilization and south-south
cooperationp• Facilitate collaboration with and integration of
contributions from partners• Country ownership of data and systems
Open Foris Initiative
• Maximize interoperability; software must
Standards-based
Maximize interoperability; software must integrate easily with national systems
• Allow direct linkages with international gorganizations
• Leverage existing technologies (XML, KML, g g g ( , ,Plinian Core, etc); not reinventing the wheel
Result: long-term, sustainable capacity.
Open Foris Initiative
• Analysis of country requirements and
Strategy
Analysis of country requirements and constraints; participatory approach
• Research into existing systems• Research into existing systems• Identification of synergies with partner
i tit ti t t i l t tiinstitutions to support implementation• Extend or build, document and share• Apply lessons learned in pilot countries
Open Foris InitiativeComponents/Systems
• Design Tools – information needs analysis,Design Tools information needs analysis, inventory design, data modeling, sampling design
• Field Data Management – mobile and PC-based data entry, QA and analysis
• Species Databases – taxonomies, local names, distribution, models and characteristics
Open Foris InitiativeComponent/Systems
• Field Crew Management – allocate and track field gwork
• Modeling Tools – customizable model chains for t t d ibl lt l l titransparent, reproducible results calculation
• Web Publishing – tool for web-based dissemination of national and sub-national resultsnational and sub national results
• Standards Development – when required, e.g. common language to defining data model and quality h k (I t D t M d li L )checks (Inventory Data Modeling Language)
• Additional tools to support multi-source NFI methods
Open Foris InitiativeProgress - Tanzania
• Data model defined in prototype IDMLData model defined in prototype IDML• Data entry user interface and
validation/checks generated from modelvalidation/checks generated from model• Preliminary plot-level estimates calculated• Collaboration with Google piloting socio• Collaboration with Google piloting socio-
economic data collection using Android handhelds (ODK)handhelds (ODK)
Open Foris InitiativeProgress - Other
• Ecuador – data entry via PDF forms direct toEcuador data entry via PDF forms direct to database. Results to be published through official MAE site.
• Peru – initial fact-finding; dissemination through MINAM, field data in MINAGg
• OFI Framework and Phase 1 proposal under development (draft by end 2010)p ( y )
• Ongoing support to country requirements
Open Foris Initiative
• Google Earth Engine API, ODK, Fusion Tables
Progress – Strategic Partnerships
• USFS, CI TEAM Network, Natureserve – PDR software, data processing and dissemination, planning, NFI work tracking
• Metla – forest models and adaptive sampling design algorithms
• FBK – cluster-based image processing, field d t i d i li tidata processing and visualization
• SIMOSOL Oy. – forest modeling software