open source innovation - the "big bang" of open x
DESCRIPTION
First given at Hanyang University, on Wed. November 26, 2014TRANSCRIPT
Open Source Innovation
The « big bang » of Open X
Jean-François OMHOVERAssistant ProfessorArts et Métiers ParisTechNov. 2015, v1.7.2-EN,available at http://bit.ly/osinnovation
These slides are protected under the license Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
contact : http://twitter.com/jfomhover
Open Source Softwareaccepted by the market !
« market shares » of Linux-based OS by IT sectors[Linux/Wikipedia, 2013]
J.F. Omhover, Arts et Métiers ParisTech, 2
Open what ?
Open Source Vehicle
www.osvehicle.com
J.F. Omhover, Arts et Métiers ParisTech 3
What ishappening ?
J.F. Omhover, Arts et Métiers ParisTech, Sept. 2011 4
J.F. Omhover, Arts et Métiers ParisTech 5
OPEN SOURCE INNOVATION
CONCEPTS
PLATFORMS
SOFTWARE
INNOVATION
BUSINESS MODELS
SHARINGHACKING
OPEN SOURCE
GOVERNANCE
INFRASTRUCTURES
COMMUNAUTIES
CONTRIBUTIONPARTICIPATION
CONTENT
PROPERTYLICENSES
FREEDOM
PROTECTION
PLATFORMSECOSYSTEMS OF INTERDEPENDANT INNOVATORS
Chapter I
6J.F. Omhover, Arts et Métiers ParisTech
Platforms
• 1950-1970: vertical structure [Ong 2004]• Processors, OS, peripherals, applications…
• IBM only responsible to develop the applications for its clients, understanding and answering their needs
• Difficulty to change your supplier
• 1980’s: Personal Computer• « A processor in a box »
• Open to programming, to amateurs
• Become a generic tool, a generative tool [Zittrain 2008]
From full integration, to fragmentation
Hardware / Software
7J.F. Omhover, Arts et Métiers ParisTech
I/c
I/b
« Nobody gets firedfor buying IBM »
I/a
Platforms
Hardware / Software
Ong, C.A., 2004. (Re-) integration dynamics of the PC platform.Massachusetts Institute of Technology. [link]
8J.F. Omhover, Arts et Métiers ParisTech
Plateformes numériques
Communication
I/e
9J.F. Omhover, Arts et Métiers ParisTech
I/d
I/fI/e - Compuserve Interface, by HistoireInformatique.com [lien]
Plateformes numériques
Communication
10J.F. Omhover, Arts et Métiers ParisTech
I/f – Mosaic navigator
I/e
I/d
I/f
Platforms
• Technologies, Products or Services
• Definition [Gawer 2000] [Cusumano 2010]
– Set of « building blocks »– Foundation for a set of firms/individuals– Develop other Techno / Products / Services– Interdependant manner
• Strategic and Industrial opportunity [Gawer 2009]
– Increases the intensity and diversity of innovation– Increases the size of the cake (not only one’s share)– Network effect, users and complementors
Towards a definition for these business interdependent, innovation eco-systems
« Plateforms » ?
11J.F. Omhover, Arts et Métiers ParisTech
CODE IT (AND SHARE IT) YOURSELFSHARING CODE, AND THE STRUGGLE ON PROPERTY
Chapter II
12J.F. Omhover, Arts et Métiers ParisTech
"The software industry is built on intellectual property. You own your technology, and if you get it widely disseminated you can coerce your
user base into buying new releases. We give up that control -- and those profits -- but that is exactly what is going to drive our success,
because that is what's best for the user.“(R. Young, Red Hat in 1998, quoted in [Harmon 1998])
Code It (and Share It) Yourself
• Sharing as a way to distribute effort– the “Share” initiative [Shell, 1959]
• Born in Aug. 1955, for the users of the IBM 704
– Cooperation between organisations• Standards for programming langages
• Sharing commun routines
• Motivations for sharing [Grier 2007]• Surplus of skills that the network can benefit from
• Share expertise, learning
Since the beginning of the computing era, sharing was perceived as important for product acceptance
SHARE, 1955
13J.F. Omhover, Arts et Métiers ParisTech
Code It (and Share It) Yourself
• Origins [Stallman, 2010]• 70’s : Community of developers/researchers around the
Digital/PDP platform, production of code/source shared amongresearchers
• 80’s : Progressive closure/locking of the architecture, the operating system, and increasing cost of licenses
• Objective• Full operating system, unix-like
• Text editors, compilators, shell…
• Based on unix, compatible with it
Hyper-collaboration for the design of an open operating system
GNU
14J.F. Omhover, Arts et Métiers ParisTech
Richard Stallman
Introduction
Linux
15J.F. Omhover, Arts et Métiers ParisTech,
Linus TorvaldsO/b
The birth of a project
Introduction
GNU / Linux
16J.F. Omhover, Arts et Métiers ParisTech,
Richard Stallman
Linus TorvaldsO/b
Code It (and Share It) Yourself
• Technical Infrastructure [Fogel, 2005]• Website, mailing list, version control, bug tracking, real-time
chat…
• Social Infrastructure [Klang, 2005]• FORKABILITY : Anybody can « take » the code, launch a new
project
• BENEVOLENT DICTATOR : regulating the project under the « pressure » of the community
• Consensus, votes, tracability VS versioning
• Protection framework [Le Crosnier, 2009]• Emergence of the licenses for Free Software, GNUPL…
"well-run open source projects are parliamentary procedure on steroids" [Fogel 2005]
Infrastructures F/OSS
17J.F. Omhover, Arts et Métiers ParisTech
14/a
13/a
Code It (and Share It) Yourself
• Complexity of the motivations : economical, social and political [Pink 2010]– Extrinsic Motivations
• Career, learning, self-advancement, peer recognition, reputation, rewards, opportunities…
– Intrinsic Motivations
• Belonging to a community, altruism, political and social motives, hedonic motivation, playing, fun, pleasure to create
• Rises many research questions[Hertel 2003] [Li 2006] [Oreg 2008] [Bitzer 2007] [Baytiyeh 2010]
– Toward economic, social, individual and collective models
– Difficulty for the analysis : the diversity of community, of organisations
Individual Motivations
18J.F. Omhover, Arts et Métiers ParisTech, Sept. 2011
[Baytiyeh 2010]
[Pink 2010]
How can it work socially ?
"Every good work of software starts by scratching a developer’s personal itch. [...] too often software
developers spend their days grinding away for pay at programs they neither need nor love.“ [Raymond 2001]
DYNAMICS OF COMMUNITIESPRODUCTION, TRANSMISSION,AND PARTICIPATION AROUND CONTENT
Chapter III
19J.F. Omhover, Arts et Métiers ParisTech
III/a
Dynamics of communities
• A dynamic similar to F/OSS• Strong intrinsic motivations
• Highly distributed functioning (and free)
• A similar technical infrastructure (« web 2.0 »)
• Legal protection of content
• « Versioning » ? (does a city have versions ?)
• For profit / Non profit ? [Kazman 2009]• Youtube, Facebook, MySpace, Blogger…
• Mechanical turk,
• “CrowdFunding” (ex : KickStarter)
With the standardisation of the publication technologies, it’s now possible to producecontent in the crowd, like we did with code
« Crowdsourcing »
20J.F. Omhover, Arts et Métiers ParisTech, Sept. 2011
III/b
III/c
Dynamics of communities
« Crowdsourcing »
21J.F. Omhover, Arts et Métiers ParisTech
III/b – Help for Haiti, a tool for building a collective cartographyof emergencies by collecting information in real time
III/b
III/c
Dynamics of communities
« Crowdsourcing »
22J.F. Omhover, Arts et Métiers ParisTech
III/c – Fold-It, a serious game for protein folding, cf [Khatib 2011]
III/b
III/c
Production in Community
“Crowdsourcing is the act of sourcing tasks traditionally performed by specific individuals to an undefined large group of people or community (crowd) through an open call." [Wikipedia EN, Jan. 2011]
“Crowdsourcing is a process that involves outsourcing tasks to a distributed group of people. This process can occur both online and offline. Crowdsourcing is different from an ordinary outsourcing since it is a task or problem that is outsourced to an undefined public rather than a specific body.” [Wikipedia EN, Fev. 2013]
“Crowdsourcing is the process of obtaining needed services, ideas, or content by soliciting contributions from a large group of people, and especially from an online community, rather than from traditional employees or suppliers.“ [Wikipedia EN, Jan. 2015]
“Channeling the experts’ desire to solve a problem then freely share the answer with everyone” [Van Ess, 2010]
commons-based peer production [Kazman 2009]
« Crowdsourcing »
23J.F. Omhover, Arts et Métiers ParisTech, Sept. 2011
An appearing (and real) dynamic, difficult to encapsulate within a definition
19/a
19/b
19/c :o)
J.F. Omhover, Arts et Métiers ParisTech 24
Dynamics of communities
Modelization in layers
The Metropolis Model, taken from [Kazman, 2009]
COLLECTIVE PROPERTYCAN WE PROTECT COLLECTIVE INNOVATION ?CAN WE MAKE SOME PROFIT FROM IT ?
Chapter IV
25J.F. Omhover, Arts et Métiers ParisTech
IV/a
Collective Property
• The GNU manifesto• “GNU is not in the public domain. Everyone will be permitted to
modify and redistribute GNU, but no distributor will be allowed to restrict its further redistribution.” [GNU Manifesto, 1985]
• “Free” is ambiguous• “free beer” or “free speech” ?
• Divergences in approaches• Open source = development methodology
• Free software = an ethical point of view, the respect of the freedom of users [Stallman 2007]
Copyleft : the only limit is freedom !
« Free » Software ?
26J.F. Omhover, Arts et Métiers ParisTech
Richard Stallman
Collective Property
• New models of intellectual property• Paternity
• Commercial use (or not)
• Modification (or not)
• Share-Alike (transitivity)
• « Creative Commons »
• Aligned with the « dynamic » of innovation• An innovation is based on others
• Interdependant building / design
• Sharing richness
How to understand « intellectual property » in different communities ?
Protection / Commons
27J.F. Omhover, Arts et Métiers ParisTech
22/a
EXPANSION OF THE OPEN GALAXYPRODUCTION, DESIGN, EDUCATION,SCIENCE, GOVERNMENT
Partie V
28J.F. Omhover, Arts et Métiers ParisTech
Open Hardware
The Arduino UNO board www.arduino.cc
J.F. Omhover, Arts et Métiers ParisTech 29
Open Hardware
OpenMoko / Neo1973 CAD files wiki.openmoko.org
J.F. Omhover, Arts et Métiers ParisTech 30
Open Hardware
Poppy the open source humanoid platform
www.poppy-project.org
J.F. Omhover, Arts et Métiers ParisTech 31
Open Hardware
Open Source Vehicle
www.osvehicle.com
J.F. Omhover, Arts et Métiers ParisTech 32
Open Hardware
OpenROV the submarine roveropenrov.com
J.F. Omhover, Arts et Métiers ParisTech 33
Open Satellite !!!
ArduSat www.ardusat.org www.spire.com
J.F. Omhover, Arts et Métiers ParisTech 34
Production & Design
Cornell, Creative Machines, Food Printing [link]
35J.F. Omhover, Arts et Métiers ParisTech
Production & Design
• Not limited to companies or laboratories
• Technology usable by « the masses » ?• Starting at 300$
• Kits DIY (printed boards, controllets…)
• Standard and mutualized
• FabLabs [Gershenfeld 2006]• Open workshops
• Production means made available to the public
• Self learning
Open Source Prototyping
DIY machines
Open Fabrication
36J.F. Omhover, Arts et Métiers ParisTech
V/a
V/b
V/c
Open Design
Page Opener, http://www.thingiverse.com/thing:1120
37J.F. Omhover, Arts et Métiers ParisTech
Production & Design
• Free means [Bowyer 2011]• Prototyping, design software
• Online exchange and transmission of models
• CC Licences
• Diversification of solutions (micro-needs)• Products to download, products to optimize
• Ex : micro market, no distribution circuits
• Communities• Sharing models, evolutions, corrections
• Prosumers : designers, engineers, manufacturers
• Thingiverse, etc…
Community of designers
Sharing models
Open Design
38J.F. Omhover, Arts et Métiers ParisTech
V/d
V/e
V/f
Production & Design
Funding platforms for innovative projects
CrowdFunding
39J.F. Omhover, Arts et Métiers ParisTech
Education & Development
• Open Course Ware• Freely available contents [Unesco, 2011]
• Ex : MIT OCW
• Open modules, contributive classes (MOOC)• First MOOCs : Stanford, AI-class / ML-class.org
• How to retain subscribers along the process
• Collecting data on students
Opening the schools, the means, supports for education
Open Education
40J.F. Omhover, Arts et Métiers ParisTech
V/g
V/h
V/i
Education & Development
• Open access to publications• Free distribution circuits
• Platforms for publishing and reviewing
• Collaboration• Research social media (ex: ResearchGate)
• Bibliography (ex: Mendeley, Zotero)
• Reviewing (ex: Hypothes.is, science.I/O)
• Distributed teams
• Crowdfunding research
Open Science
41J.F. Omhover, Arts et Métiers ParisTech
(back to) an open research, open laboratories and open collaboration betweeninternational research units [Nielsen, 2011]
Open Data
Thanks to the detailed topographic data released by the city of Rennes (France), Handimap can propose an application that computes the best path if you are in a wheelchair - www.handimap.org
J.F. Omhover, Arts et Métiers ParisTech 42
Open Government
Regards Citoyens, study of the lobbying within the french parliement reports,July 2011 [link]
J.F. Omhover, Arts et Métiers ParisTech 43
… AND INTO THE DARK MATTERWHAT COULD GO WRONG ?
Chapter VI
44J.F. Omhover, Arts et Métiers ParisTech
Open technology über cool
Watch parts 1950, made with embedded radium, used by a swedish (theysay so) to experiment nuclear reaction in his kitchen [link], cf "Atomsplitting in my kitchen was a hobby, man tells Swedish police", The Guardian, Aug. 3rd 2011
J.F. Omhover, Arts et Métiers ParisTech 45
Open technology über cool
The « Liberator » is the first gun entirely printed with 3D printers, it canbe downloader online (Credit: Screenshot by Dara Kerr/CNET) [link]
J.F. Omhover, Arts et Métiers ParisTech, Sept. 2011 46
Crowdfunding fail or fraud ?
« He raises 123000 $ on Kickstarters, cancels the project and spends all the money », Journal du Gamer, 26/07/2013 [link]
J.F. Omhover, Arts et Métiers ParisTech 47
Crowdsourced« Human Flesh Search »
« Brown University student falsely identified as Boston bombing suspect found dead in Providence River — NBC News (@NBCNews) 25 avril 2013[link]
J.F. Omhover, Arts et Métiers ParisTech, Sept. 2011 48
BIBLIOGRAPHIE
J.F. Omhover, Arts et Métiers ParisTech 49
Baytiyeh, H. & Pfaffman, J., 2010. Open source software: A community of altruists. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), p.1345-1354. [lien]
Berners-Lee Tim, 2010, The year open data went worldwide, TED
Engage, 2009, Engage: Getting on with Government 2.0, a publication of the government 2.0 taskforce, Dec 2009, http://bit.ly/bU8CrD
Bitzer, J., Schrettl, W. & Schroder, P.J.H., 2007. Intrinsic motivation in open source software development. Journal of Comparative Economics, 35(1), p.160–169 [lien]
Bowyer A., Cuartilles D., 2011. Mechatronics: Arduino & RepRap - Creating Wealth by Giving it Away (Keynote). International Conference on Engineering Design - ICED'11. [lien]
CIGREF, 2011. Maturité et gouvernance de l’Open Source, [lien]
Capra, E. et al., 2011. Firms’ involvement in Open Source projects: A trade-off between software structural quality and popularity. Journal of Systems and Software, 84(1), p.144-161. [lien]
Cusumano, M., 2010. Technology strategy and management: The evolution of platform thinking. Communications of the ACM, 53(1), p.32. [lien]
Durand, R., Vergne, J.P., L'organisation pirate. Essai sur l'évolution du capitalisme, Le Bord de l'eau, coll. « Mondes Marchands », 2010, 176 p., EAN : 9782356870841. [lien]
Fogel, K., 2005. Producing Open Source Software : How to Run a Successful Free Software Project, O’Reilly ed.. [lien]
Gawer A., 2000. The organization of platform leadership: an empirical investigation of intel’s management processes aimed at fostering complementary innovation by third parties. Report of the Sloan School of Management [lien]
Gawer, 2009. Platforms, Markets and Innovation, Ed. Edward Elgar Publishing
Gershenfeld N., 2006, Fab Labs, TED, [lien]
Gonon, 2011, Universités et réseaux sociaux, web [lien]
Grier, D.A., 2007. Working Class Hero. The Known World, IEEE Computer Society Podcasts, 03/05/2007, [lien]
Harmon, A., 1998. For Sale: Free Software; Backers of Linux Say System Is Basis For Revolutionizing Computer Business. New York Times. 28/09/1998
Hertel, G., 2003. Motivation of software developers in Open Source projects: an Internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel. Research Policy, 32(7), p.1159-1177.
Kazman, R. & Chen, H., 2009. The metropolis model a new logic for development of crowdsourced systems. Communications of the ACM, 52(7), p.76-75. [lien]
Khatib, F. et al., 2011. Algorithm discovery by protein folding game players. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, [lien]
Klang, M., 2005. Free software and open source. First Monday, 10(3) [lien]
Le Crosnier H., 2009. Leçons d'émancipation : l'exemple du mouvement des logiciels libres. ATTAC. [lien]
Li, Y. et al., 2006. Motivating open source software developers: influence of transformational and transactional leaderships. Proceedings of the Special Interest Group on Computer Personnel Research Annual Conference [lien]
Mingqing, X., 2010. Does open source software decrease profit of proprietary software producer and increase social welfare. In The 2nd International Conference on Information Science and Engineering. IEEE, pp. 203-206. [lien]
Nielsen, M. 2011, Open Science Now !, TED, [lien]
Owni 2001, Les Fab Labs capitalisent, Owni, 26/09/2011, [lien]
Ong, C.A., 2004. (Re-) integration dynamics of the PC platform. Report of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. [lien]
Oreg, S. & Nov, O., 2008. Exploring motivations for contributing to open source initiatives: The roles of contribution context and personal values. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5), p.2055–2073. [lien]
O'Reilly T., 2005, What Is Web 2.0 : Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software , 09/30/2005, [lien]
Pink D., 2010, Drive: The surprising truth about what motivates us, RSA/Animate, http://bit.ly/cmISIs
Raymond, E.S., 2000. The Cathedral and the Bazaar. [lien] Accessed October 1, 2011
Rossi, C. & Bonaccorsi, A., 2005. Why profit-oriented companies enter the OS field?: intrinsic vs. extrinsic incentives. International Conference on Software Engineering, 30(4). [lien]
Rouvroy, A. & Berns, T., 2010a. Le nouveau pouvoir statistique : ou quand le contrôle s’exerce sur un réel normé, docile et sans événement car constitué de corps « numériques ». Multitudes, 40(1), p.88-103. [lien]
Rouvroy A., 2010b, in « La gouvernementalité algorithmique », Place de la Toile, France Culture, 21/05/2010
Shell, D., 1959. The SHARE 709 system: a cooperative effort. Journal of the ACM (JACM), (August 1955), p.123-127. [lien]
Stallman, R.M., 2010. Free software, free society : selected essays of Richard M. Stallman (2nd edition) J. Gay, ed., Gnu Press.
UNESCO, 2011. Guidelines for Open Educational Resources (OER) in Higher Education, UNESCO, Commonwealth of Learning. [lien]
Wasserman, T. & Capra, E., 2007. Evaluating software engineering processes in commercial and community open source projects. In First International Workshop on Emerging Trends in FLOSS Research and Development (FLOSS’07: ICSE Workshops 2007). IEEE. [lien]
Zittrain, J.L., 2008. The Future of the Internet (and how to stop it), Yale University Press. [lien]
IllustrationsO/a – Mail d’origine de Linux, by Linux History [lien]
O/b – “Linux Distro Timeline” unknown origin, found at [lien]
I/a – IBM logo
I/b - IBM System 360, by Michael Coté, on Flickr, CC-by [lien]
I/c - Mike Licht, NotionsCapital.com, on Flickr, CC-by [lien]
I/d – exemple de Bulletin Board System, [lien]
I/e - Compuserve Interface, by HistoireInformatique.com [lien]
I/f – Mosaic navigator
II/f – an assembly :o)
III/a - MIT team wins Darpa's treasure hunt in less than one day, The Guardian, Dec 2009, http://bit.ly/cBRF2c
III/b – Project for Haiti, cartography of the information relevant for targeting rescue [lien]
III/c – Fold-It, a serious game on folding molecules, cf [Khatib 2011]
IV/a - Workers manufacture Guy Fawkes masks at a factory in São Gonçalo, Brazil in July. Reuters
IV/b - Creative Commons, the different contracts, http://bit.ly/9mjzHC
V/a - MakerBot Thing-O-Matic
V/b - eMaker Huxley
V/c - Fab@Home
V/d - FreeCAD
V/e - Page Opener, [lien]
V/f - HTC Evo 3D extended battery case, [lien]
V/g – MIT Open Course Ware [lien]
V/h – Mascotte du cours Machine Learning [lien]
V/i – logo Coursera [lien]