operational experience with interlock systems during 3mev commissioning phase

18
COMMISSIONING AND MEASUREMENTS OPERATIONAL EXPERIENCE WITH INTERLOCK SYSTEMS DURING 3MEV COMMISSIONING PHASE

Upload: eze

Post on 24-Feb-2016

47 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Operational experience with interlock systems during 3MeV commissioning phase . commissioning and measurements . 45 kev to 3 Mev. i on source. RFQ. c hopper line. Diagnostics line. spectrometer. b eam dump. Movable Diagnostic bench . - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Operational experience with interlock systems during 3MeV commissioning phase

C O M M I S S I O N I N G A N D M E A S U R E M E N T S

OPERATIONAL EXPERIENCE WITH INTERLOCK

SYSTEMS DURING 3MEV COMMISSIONING PHASE

Page 2: Operational experience with interlock systems during 3MeV commissioning phase

45 KEV TO 3 MEV

ion source

RFQ

chopper line

Diagnostics line

spectrometer

beam dump

source : 45 keVLEBT 2

solenoids, 2 steerers

Beam currentBeam profileSlit and grid emitt (temporary)

RFQ : 3 MeV MEBT

11 quads3 bunchers2 choppers

Beam current at 2 locations

Wire scanners

Page 3: Operational experience with interlock systems during 3MeV commissioning phase

MOVABLE DIAGNOSTIC BENCH

Low energy bench (up to 12 MeV)

Spectrometer (0.2 %)Slit and Grid EmittanceToF (calibration)Bunch Shape MonitorHalo Monitor (chopping eff.)

Page 4: Operational experience with interlock systems during 3MeV commissioning phase

TRANSMISSION VS. RF POWERFOR DIFFERENT PRESSURE IN THE LEBT (NEUTRALISATION)

Page 5: Operational experience with interlock systems during 3MeV commissioning phase

TRANSVERSE EMITTANCE-DIRECT

Yellow = measured, pink = simulations

Page 6: Operational experience with interlock systems during 3MeV commissioning phase

LONG EMITTANCE -INDIRECT

BU.1 fixed

BU.2 varying BU.3 OFF

BSM

MeasurementReconstruction

RFQ

1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 400010

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

Beam RMS phase vs Cavity amplitude

MeasurementsSimulationReconstructed

Buncher 2 Amplitude (A.U.)

Beam

RM

S ph

ase

(°)

Page 7: Operational experience with interlock systems during 3MeV commissioning phase

Expected : 21 keVReconstructed : 22 keV

Reconstruction technique and diagnostic performance were validated !

LONG EMITTANCE -INDIRECT

Page 8: Operational experience with interlock systems during 3MeV commissioning phase

Micro-bunches are shifted in the phase space by a voltage applied between two plates. Relatively low voltage to allow for short rise/fall time.Shift transferred in the real space at the dump – Appropriate phase advance.

Chopper principle

Page 9: Operational experience with interlock systems during 3MeV commissioning phase

The chopper is working

0 50 100 150 2000

1

2

3

4measurement 14.05.2013 simulations chopper off

simulations chopper on measurements 14.5.2013

L4L.QFC.03130 (A)

BC

T.04

040

(mA

)

Fall and rise time < 10 ns !

The chopper line dynamics is validated !

Page 10: Operational experience with interlock systems during 3MeV commissioning phase

THE BIS

BIS was connected only in the tunnel

It always worked when it was supposed to be

We got a demo and we understand how it works and we know how to read the tables (personally I find colour coding a bit tricky)

Most of the signals were connected to the BIS

Watchdog was connected only the last day

Sometime during the commissioning phase we need to allow for losses but….

Page 11: Operational experience with interlock systems during 3MeV commissioning phase

ON DECEMBER 12 AT 16:30 A SEVERE VACUUM LEAK WAS OBSERVED IN THE MEBT LINE. IT WAS LOCATED ON THE BELLOW DOWNSTREAM THE FIRST

BUNCHER CAVITY, ON THE LEFT SIDE WHEN LOOKING DOWN THE BEAM LINE.

Page 12: Operational experience with interlock systems during 3MeV commissioning phase
Page 13: Operational experience with interlock systems during 3MeV commissioning phase

BEAM IS FIRST SUSPECT

beam  Beam current 12.5mAPulse length 300us, 1Hz

Misalignment at the RFQ output Xc=0.67mm        yc=-0.35mmX’c=6mrad          y’c=-11mrad

LEBT solenoids AQN to be set L4L.SNB.01050 87.01632L4L.SNB.01170 114.571488

MEBT quadrupoles AQN to be set

L4L.MQD.3110 (Q1) 147.2585251L4L.MQF.3210 (Q2) 0L4L.MQD.3310 (Q3) 0L4L.MQF.3410 -52.60076696L4L.MQF.3510 -46.48494016 L4L.MQD.3610 176.6553191L4L.MQF.3710 -119.998277L4L.MQD.3810 35.875L4L.MQF.3910 -31.47315951L4L.MQD.4010 54.05899705 L4L.MQF.4110 -52.24188791

Page 14: Operational experience with interlock systems during 3MeV commissioning phase

BEAM GOING INTO THE PAPER, SCRAPING ON THE LEFT SIDE . 16% LOST ON THE BELLOW

Page 15: Operational experience with interlock systems during 3MeV commissioning phase

CONFIRMED BY CESARE ! Angle a(deg)

Scaled energy deposition Ed(J/cm3/pulse)

Approximate DT (ºC/pulse)

1 174.52 46.76

5 871.56 233.54

10 1736.48 465.30

15 2588.19 693.52

20 3420.20 916.46

30 5000.00 1339.77

40 6427.88 1722.38

45 7071.07 1894.73

50 7660.44 2052.65

60 8660.25 2320.56

70 9396.93 2517.95

80 9848.08 2638.84

90 10000.00 2679.55

Page 16: Operational experience with interlock systems during 3MeV commissioning phase

COMBINATION OF UNLIKELY BUT POSSIBLE EVENTS

• A severe misalignment between the RFQ and the MEBT that was not present at the 3 MeV test stand and was later confirmed by survey

• An optic that favoured amplification of this misalignment whilst focusing the beam to sub mm size in the other direction

• A phase advance such that the loss occurred on the “wave” (or lip) of the bellow which is only 200 microns thick and it is an aperture limitation (25.1 mm vs 28 mm of adjacent vacuum chamber).

Page 17: Operational experience with interlock systems during 3MeV commissioning phase

ACTIONS • RFQ_MEBT were realigned . Add a protection on each jack in order to

prevent any manipulation of the alignment screw and ask SURVEY for a smoothing before new beam for the next diagnostic line positions

• That any measurement with settings that are very far from nominal should be firstly thoroughly simulated and done over few shots if they generate losses. Settings which generate losses should be allowed only in exceptional circumstances and in presence of the supervisor.

• The bellows are a point of weakness and their bore aperture should never be smaller than the adjacent vacuum chamber. It is proposed that all the bellows that don’t satisfy this criterion are progressively replaced at a convenient time. A protection of the bellow could also be put in place.

Page 18: Operational experience with interlock systems during 3MeV commissioning phase

7.000 8.000 9.000 10.000 11.000 12.000 13.000 14.000 15.000 16.000

-2-1.8-1.6-1.4-1.2

-1-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2

00.20.40.60.8

11.21.41.61.8

2 L4 lissage radiale 3MeV

Ecarts lors de la mesureEcarts après alignement

Dcum (m)

dR (

mm

)

LEBT RFQ MEBT

sens faisceau; écarts "+" vers le passage