opinions of non-muslims about muhammad (pbuh)

Upload: osamaazizkhan

Post on 03-Apr-2018

221 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/28/2019 Opinions of Non-muslims About Muhammad (PBUH)

    1/4

    1

    Note: When the name of Prophet, Muhammad or Ahmad comes, do remember to

    say, Sallallahu Alayhe Wasallam

    Opinions of non-Muslims about Islam

    Sword-A Fantastically Absurd Myth Of Historians

    De Lacy OLeary writes: History makes it clear, however, that the legend of fanatical

    Muslims sweeping through the world and forcing Islam at the point of the sword upon

    conquered races is one of the mist fantastically absurd myths that historians have ever

    repeated.

    Well Established Facts, No Sword

    (Islam at the Crossroads, London, 1923, page 8, De Lacy OLeary).

    Lawrence E. Browne opines: Incidentally these well established facts dispose of the idea so

    widely fostered in Christian writings that the Muslims, wherever they went, forced people

    to accept Islam at the point of the sword.

    Deplorable Contriving To Put Out Scientific Obligation

    (The Prospects of Islam, London, 1944, page 14, Lawrence E. Browne).

    H.G. Farmer says: One of the most deplorable things in history, said Dr. J.W. Draper, is the

    systematic way European writers have contrived to put out of sight the scientific obligations

    of the Arabs.

    No Temples Needed

    (Historical facts in the Arabian Musical Influence H.G Farmer).

    Hunter says: It is one of the glories of Islam that temples are not made with hands and that

    its ceremonies can be performed anywhere upon Gods earth or under His heaven.

    Europes Extrication From Darkness by Muslims

    (Our Indian Musulmans Humter).

    Marquis of Dufferin says: It is to Muslims science, to Muslims art and to Muslims literature

    that Europe has been in a great measure indebted for its extrication from the darkness of

    the Middle Ages.

    Islamic Brotherhood

    (Speeches Delivered in India, London, 1890, page 24, Marquis of Dufferin and Ava).

    Browne says further: The Islamic brotherhood which they proclaimed was a real thing, and

    a new thing, and a new thing among Eastern nations. It is doubtful whether Christian

    Syrians ever felt the same sense of brotherhood with Christian Persians as Muslim Syrians

    did with Muslim Persians.

  • 7/28/2019 Opinions of Non-muslims About Muhammad (PBUH)

    2/4

    2

    (The Prospects of Islam, London, 1944, page 12, Lawrence E. Browne)

    Stones And Sneers Could Not Kill It

    .

    Edward Clodd says: A religion which has fed the heart-hunger of millions of men for nigh

    thirteen hundred years cannot have been cradled in fraud. It did not grow without a

    struggle, for, if stones and sneers could have killed it, it would have died during

    Muhammads lifetime.

    Puts Christian Nations To Shame

    E. Alexander Powell states: In their wars of conquest, however, the Muslims exhibited a

    degree of toleration which puts many Christian nations to shame.

    Sword, Quite False

    (The Struggle for Power in Moslem Asia, New York 1923, page 48 E. Alexander Powell).

    A.S. Tritton says: The picture of the Muslim soldiers advancing with a sword in one hand

    and a Koran in the other is quite false.

    On It Could Be Built Perfect World Religion

    (Islam, London, 1951, page 21A.S. Tritton)

    Greenless says: The nobility and broad tolerance of this creed, which accepts as

    God-inspired all the real religions of the world, will always be a glorious heritage for

    mankind. On it could indeed be built a perfect world religion.

    Jihad (Holy War) Defensive Against Those Who Menaced Existence Of Islam

    (The Gospel of Islam Adyar 1948, page 27, Duncan Greenleers, M.A. [Oxon]).

    O Houdes opines: The Jihad was not really obligatory except against peoples who had no

    revealed religion or who menaced the existence of Islam Jihad had to be waged to defend

    Islam against aggressions Once this was terminated the Muslims always displayed a great

    tolerance towards the conquered peoples leaving them their legislation and religious

    beliefs.

    The System Of The Wisest: Ever Existed In The World

    (La Grande Encyclopaedia, 1894, Tome 20, page 1006, O Houdes).

    Edmund Burke writes: The Muhammadan law which is binding on all from the crowned

    head to the meanest subject is a law interwoven with a system of the wisest, the most

    learned and the most enlightened jurisprudence that ever existed in the world.

    (Impeachment of Warren Hastings by The English statesman and Orator.)

  • 7/28/2019 Opinions of Non-muslims About Muhammad (PBUH)

    3/4

    3

    To The World More Suited Than Christianity

    Lancelot Lawton says: As a religion the Mohomedan religion, it must be confessed, is more

    suited to Africa than is the Christian religion; indeed, I would even say that it is more suited

    to the world as a whole It is undeniable that polygamy, or to speak more accurately, the

    principle underlying it, is not confined to Moslem peoples. To put the matter plainly, who

    can honestly say that the sexual morality of the West is superior to that of the East? A fair

    comparison would, I believe, very much favour the latter. Then it is undeniable also that

    faith in the power of the sword is by no means restricted to the Islamic world. Who can bear

    more telling witness to the truth of this assertion than Moslems themselves, who have

    suffered greatly from the swords of the Western nations? Putting aside these two points of

    resemblance, the achievement of the Moslem faith enjoys, I maintain a definite superiority,

    in proof of which may be cited Moslem abstinence, sense of fraternity, condemnation of

    usury, recognition of prophets other than its own. Its quality may be summed up by sayingthat it takes a man as he is, and while it does not pretend to make a god out of him, it seeks

    to regulate his conduct so that at least he shall become a good neighbour.

    More Cruelty Under Christianity

    (The Sphere, London for 12th

    May, 1928 Lancelot Lawton).

    J.M. Robertson writes:

    Under Christianity there was certainly more cruelty than under early Islam. The Caliph Abu

    Bakr had given to his followers three injunctions: Be just, die rather than yield; Be merciful,

    slay neither old men, children nor women; Destroy neither fruit trees, grain nor cattle. Keep

    your word even to your enemies.

    Purer Than System Of Zoroaster: More Liberal Than Law Of Moses

    (A short History of Christianity, page 4)

    Gibbon says: More pure than the system of Zoroaster, more liberal than the law of Moses,

    the religion of Mohamet might seem less inconsistent with reason than the creed of

    mystery and superstition which in the seventh century disgraced the simplicity of the

    gospels.

    (The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, London 1938 and 1939 Vol. V,

    page 487, by Edward Gibbon).

  • 7/28/2019 Opinions of Non-muslims About Muhammad (PBUH)

    4/4

    4

    Christianity Continually Changing From Origin, Not Islam

    Lheureux writes: Islam had the power of peacefully conquering souls by the simplicity of

    its theology, the clearness of its dogma and principles, and the definite number of the

    practices which it demands. In contrast to Christianity which has been undergoing continual

    transformation since its origin, Islam had remained identical with itself.

    (Etude sur LIslamisme, page 35,Jean Lheureux).

    Corrupted Christianity; Decaying Zoroastrian

    Wells says: Can a man who has no good qualities hold a friend? Because those who knew

    Muhammad best believed in him most. Khadija for all her days believed in him but she may

    have been a fond woman. Abu Bekr is a better witness, and he never wavered in his

    devotion. Abu Bekr believed in the Prophet, and it is very hard for anyone who reads the

    history of these times not to belive in Abu Bekr. All again risked his life for the Prophet in his

    darkest days. Muhammad was no imposter, at any rate But the personal quality of

    Muhammad is one thing and the quality of Islam is quite another. Muhammad was not

    pitted against Jesus or Mani, and his relative stature is only a very secondary question for us;

    it is Islam which was pitted against the corrupted Christianity of the seventh century and

    against the decaying tradition of the Zoroastrian Magi with which the historian has the

    greater concern. And whether it was through its Prophet or whether it was in spite of its

    Prophet, and through certain accidents in its origin and certain qualities of the desert from

    where it sprang, there can be no denying that Islam possesses many fine and noble

    attributes. (Ibid, page 325)

    HKIYA --- May 2010