opportunities: improve interoperability ... from a library viewpoint
DESCRIPTION
ORCID and DataCite Interoperability Network (ODIN) 2012 Kickoff MeetingTRANSCRIPT
Opportunities: Improve Interoperability ...from a library viewpoint
Lambert Heller ORCID and DataCite Interoperability Network (ODIN) 2012 Kickoff Meeting
Berlin, 18.10.2012
2
Relevance ranking in academic search, ca. 2012
3
Adding a social angel to relevance: Altmetrics
4
Adding a social angel to relevance: Altmetrics
(Maybe) common sense: • ALM = better than to
have only peer review and citation counts
How do they compare? • Peer review + citations =
done by a few experts on research topic of article in question.
• Bookmarks, Tweets, Likes, usage data... = broad, but diffuse.
5
In 2017, bookmarks may be (simple) statements
(from: HCLSIG/SWANSIOC/Actions/RhetoricalStructure)
6
In 2017, bookmarks may be (simple) statements
(from: HCLSIG/SWANSIOC/Actions/RhetoricalStructure)
...and not just on journals articles, but also • blog postings • shared research data • additions to collaborative work
(e.g. wiki article, genome annotation on Github)
• „nano publications“ (e.g. scientific claims)
• ...
7
Identified authors = authors we know more about
8
Identified authors = authors we know more about
Thanks to interoperable identifiers, we gain knowledge from different sources: • Institutional („research
information systems“), • Personal („Facebook for
scientists“, cf. VIVO), • Publishers, repositories (cf.
ORCID) • Research libraries, • Citation analysis • etc.
9
Identified authors = authors we know more about
...therefore can not only be linked to their journals articles, but also to their • blog postings • shared research data • additions to collaborative work • „nano publications“ • ...
Thanks to interoperable identifiers, we gain knowledge from different sources: • Institutional („research
information systems“), • Personal („Facebook for
scientists“, cf. VIVO), • Publishers, repositories (cf.
ORCID) • Research libraries, • Citation analysis • etc.
10
Identified authors = authors we know more about
...therefore can not only be linked to their journals articles, but also to their • blog postings • shared research data • additions to collaborative work • „nano publications“ • ...
book-markers
Thanks to interoperable identifiers, we gain knowledge from different sources: • Institutional („research
information systems“), • Personal („Facebook for
scientists“, cf. VIVO), • Publishers, repositories (cf.
ORCID) • Research libraries, • Citation analysis • etc.
11
Relevance ranking in academic search, ca. 2017?
Sort your results • Relevance A: (Number of) positive
statements from researchers on topic • Relevance B: (Number of) statements
from researchers on topic in total • Relevance C: ...
12
Relevance ranking in academic search, ca. 2017?
Sort your results • Relevance A: (Number of) positive
statements from researchers on topic • Relevance B: (Number of) statements
from researchers on topic in total • Relevance C: ...
Enhance your search to • Blog postings • Nano publications • ...
13
Relevance ranking in academic search, ca. 2017?
Sort your results • Relevance A: (Number of) positive
statements from researchers on topic • Relevance B: (Number of) statements
from researchers on topic in total • Relevance C: ...
Enhance your search to • Blog postings • Nano publications • ...
Does anybody need this? • Cf. Rise of arXiv,
PLoS ONE... • Priem/Hemminger:
„Decoupling the scholarly journal“
14
What identifiers do we need to make that happen?
Interoperable Identifiers for • researchers • any kind of scholarly objects (+ collaborative, dynamic objects) • organizational structures of academia (beyond grant numbers) • in some cases, even for things (e.g. telescopes)
15
What identifiers do we need to make that happen?
Identifiers that can be used/enriched by • their „owners“ – e .g. authors with their ORCID • Institutions – e.g. librarians linking objects to ORCIDs when
their owners can`t/won`t • others – e.g. citation references (+ bookmarking, tweeting...)
16
What identifiers do we need to make that happen?
As a result, identifiers shouldn`t be private property (but need to be in the public domain). And perhaps most important:
We need a broad awareness of identifiers and relation types that are already in use, and a culture of reuse across different application types (publishers, researcher network services, institutional research information systems, and libraries).
Linked Open Data may be helpful in that way.
17
Questions + feedback = welcome J
• Twitter @Lambo • Skype wikify • Mail [email protected] • Web http://wikify.org/
• This presentation: http://de.slideshare.net/lambo/tag/odin12
Vielen Dank für Ihre Aufmerksamkeit!