optimal operating strategies for a segmented supply chain · promotional activities such as ads in...
TRANSCRIPT
Author : Bernadette OrendeAdvisor: Dr. Sergio Alex Caballero
Optimal Operating Strategies for a Segmented Supply Chain
MIT SCM Research FESTMay 22, 2018
1
Contents
MOTIVATION
METHODOLOGY
RESULTS
CONCLUSION
2
Project Background & Scope• Company:
a multi-national manufacturer and distributor of a range of fast moving consumer goods
• Order fulfillment:Based on demand signal from customers which is broken down into 4 unique replenishment streams
Motivation Methodology Results Conclusion
Supplier Manufacturer Distribution Center Retailer Customer
3
Replenishment Streams
Motivation Methodology Results ConclusionVo
lum
e
Periods
Base Demand
Volu
me
Promotions
Volu
me
Initiatives
Volu
me
IBA
v Daily movement of product characterized by stable demand signal
v Planned promotional activities such as ads in retail stores
v Unplanned demand spikes that occur with very little notice
v Driven primarily by customer launch plans
v New SKUs brought to market for the first time
Periods Periods Periods
4
% Shipment Volume by Streams
Motivation Methodology Results Conclusion
Base Demand73%
Promo17%
IBA5%
Initiatives5%
5
SKU Behavior
Motivation Methodology Results Conclusion
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1/1/16 2/1/16 3/1/16 4/1/16 5/1/16 6/1/16
Ship
men
ts
Base Demand
Initiative-Phase In
Promo
Note: Replenishment streams are not a property of the SKU
6
Research Questions
Is there a benefit to differentiating the supply chain by the four identified replenishment streams or some hybrid?
What are the optimal supply chain operating strategies for demand, sourcing, and distribution that minimize cost, increase cash, and
maximize service and sales?
Motivation Methodology Results Conclusion
7
Data
• 10,000 rows of shipment data over a span of 19 months
• 7 brands of a product family filtered to 3 pertinent brands
• 835 distinct SKUs
• Geolocation mapping of company’s manufacturing plants and mixing centers
Motivation Methodology Results Conclusion
8
Data Analysis• Segmentation
• Coefficient of Variation
• Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
• Mean Absolute Percent Error (MAPE)
• Distribution Network Mapping
• Case Fill Rate
Motivation Methodology Results Conclusion
9
Demand Strategy
Motivation Methodology Results Conclusion
10
Demand Strategy
Motivation Methodology Results Conclusion
Hypothesis:
Pool Streams Decreased Variability
Higher Forecast Accuracy
Reduction of Safety Stock
Lower Average Inventory
11
Demand Strategy
Motivation Methodology Results Conclusion
31.6%
32.3%
32%
33%
71%
74%
168%
BASE, IBA, PROMO
BASE DEMAND
BASE, PROMO
BASE, IBA
IBA, PROMO
PROMO
IBA
Coefficient of Variation by StreamvCoefficient of Variation used to measure variability
vNew Initiatives stream was not included as production plan is dependent on customer launch plans
12
Demand Strategy
Motivation Methodology Results Conclusion
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
80000
90000
100000
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81
Ship
men
t Vol
ume
Periods (Weeks)
Shipments by Stream and Week
Base Demand Promo IBAInitiatives Linear (Base Demand) Linear (Promo)Linear (IBA) Linear (Initiatives)
Ship
men
t Vol
ume
Stream MAPE CoVIBA 256% 168%
Promo 33% 74%Base Demand 9% 32.3%
Base Demand, IBA, Promo 9% 31.6%
13
Demand Strategy
Motivation Methodology Results Conclusion
Strong positive correlation?
Do Not Pool Pool
Yes No
IBA New InitiativesPromotionsBase
DemandBase,
Promo, IBA Initiatives
Lean Strategy
Agile Strategy
Customer Product Launch
Plan
Lean Strategy
Customer Product Launch
Plan14
Demand Strategy
Motivation Methodology Results Conclusion
Base Demand
LEAN STRATEGY
Promotions IBA
AGILE STRATEGY AGILE STRATEGY
Base, Promo, IBA
LEAN STRATEGYPooling Benefits
o Stable demand
o Eliminate non-value adding activities
o Collaborative Planning, Forecasting & Replenishment (CPFR)
o Collaborative Planning, Forecasting & Replenishment
o Improved forecast accuracy
o Lower safety stock leading to lower average inventory
o Streamline Operations 15
Distribution Strategy
Motivation Methodology Results Conclusion
16
Distribution Strategy
Motivation Methodology Results Conclusion
4 Distinct Strategies:
v Direct Shipment
v Warehousing
v Cross Docking
v Transshipment
17
Distribution Strategy
Motivation Methodology Results Conclusion
Case Fill Rate (CFR):
v Measure of Customer Service level and the satisfaction of customers
v Amount shipped over amount ordered
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15CF
RCustomer Rank
CFR for Top 15 Customers
18
Distribution Strategy
Motivation Methodology Results Conclusion
Customer Rank
Miss
ed C
FR %
19
Distribution Strategy
Motivation Methodology Results Conclusion
Lean
Base Demand
Agile “Leagile”
New Initiatives Promo & IBAo Focused on
elimination of waste and non value adding activities
o Flexibility o Lean & Agile hybrid that employs postponement
20
Distribution Strategy
Motivation Methodology Results Conclusion
Base Demand
vTop 15 customers drive ~80% of base demand
vThe top customer is responsible for ~32% of base demand shipments
vStrategically store inventory for the base demand stream in mixing centers that regularly services those particular customers
OPTIMIZE FOR LEAN
21
Distribution Strategy
Motivation Methodology Results Conclusion
New Initiativesv95% of volume driven by the top 12 customers with
customer #1 responsible for 74% of the shipments
v2 options for customer #1:- Directly ship products to customer contingent on
transportation costs and shipment volume - Direct shipment from plant to mixing center and
cross docked for shipment to customer
v Remaining 26% of shipments are fragmented between customers. Pursue option 2 above
OPTIMIZE FOR AGILITY22
Distribution Strategy
Motivation Methodology Results Conclusion
Promotions and IBA
vPromotions and IBA together only make up 22% of total shipments
vPool both under a “leagile” strategy that employs postponement
vGeneric form of products should be held at mixing centers and customized accordingly when order is received
23
Sourcing Strategy
Motivation Methodology Results Conclusion
24
SKU Behavior
Motivation Methodology Results Conclusion
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1/1/16 2/1/16 3/1/16 4/1/16 5/1/16 6/1/16
Ship
men
ts
Base Demand
Initiative-Phase In
Promo
Note: Replenishment streams are not a property of the SKU
25
SKU Segmentation
Motivation Methodology Results Conclusion
A Items:80% of Volume12% of SKUs
B Items15% of Volume17% of SKUs
C Items5% of Volume71% of SKUs
26
Sourcing Strategy
Motivation Methodology Results Conclusion
B & C SKUsA SKUs
27
Sourcing Strategy
Motivation Methodology Results Conclusion
% of SKUs
A SKUs B & C SKUs
LEAN
AGILE
28
Sourcing Strategy
Motivation Methodology Results Conclusion
ALL SKUS
"A" SKUs (12% of SKUs, 80% of Volume)
"B" SKUs (17% of SKUs, 15% of Volume)
"C" SKUs (71% of SKUs, 5% of Volume)
Optimize for Lean- Long term Strategic
Contract- Low Cost Sources
Optimize for Agility- Source Closer to
Market29
Takeaways
• “One size does not fit all” when it comes to operational strategies.
• Strategies should be curated for a company according to a company’s data, resources and capabilities.
Motivation Methodology Results Conclusion
30