optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

172
OPTIMIZATION OF WATER-JET PROPULSION SYSTEM FOR SURFACE EFFECT SHIPS William Raymond Johanek

Upload: others

Post on 16-Oct-2021

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

OPTIMIZATION OF WATER-JET PROPULSION SYSTEMFOR SURFACE EFFECT SHIPS

William Raymond Johanek

Page 2: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

DUDLEY KNOX LIBR'^RV

NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCi K

MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA

Page 3: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

OPTIMIZATION OF WATER-JET PROPULSION SYSTEM

FOR SURFACE EFFECT SHIPS

by

WILLIAM RAYMOND JOHANEK

B.S., U.S. COAST GUARD ACADEMY (I968)

SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT

OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE

DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE

IN NAVAL ARCHITECTURE AND MARINE ENGINEERING

AND MASTER OF SCIENCE

IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING

at the

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

MAY. 197^

Page 4: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

It

Page 5: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

DUDLEY KNOX LIBRARYNAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOLMONTEREY, CALIFORNIA 93940

OPTIMIZATION OF WATER-JET PROPULSION SYSTEM

FOR SURFACE EFFECT SHIPS

by

William Raymond Johanek

Submitted to the Department of Ocean Engineering onMay 9 i 197^t in partial fulfullment of the requirements fordegrees of Master of Science in Naval Architecture andMarine Engineering and Master of Science in MechanicalEngineering.

ABSTRACT

Water-jet propulsion systems using flush inlet suitablefor use on surface effect ships are studied. The equationsgoverning the performance of the system are developed andincorporated into a computer program which optimizes thesystem on a least total weight basis. Resistance, displacement,range, speed, and other data are supplied to the program whichthen calculates total propulsion system weight for a number ofjet velocity ratios. The system utilizes marine gas turbineengines coupled to multi-stage axial-flow pumps throughplanetary reduction gears. Variable area flush inlets andconstant area nozzles are used. Results for a 2000 ton vesselare presented and show the influence of the jet velocity ratioon the weight and power requirements of the vessel. A FORTRANcomputer program listing is included.

Thesis Supervisor: A. Douglas Carmichael

Title : Professor of Power Engineering

- 2 -

Page 6: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 7: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Title Page 1

Abstract 2

Table of Contents 3

List of Figures and Tables 4

List of Synbols Used in Text ; 5

Chapter 1 . Introduction 8

Chapter 2 . System Description , 11

Chapter 3. Development of Equations, 14

Chapter 4. Pumps, Reduction Gears, and Engines ,21

4.

1

Pumps 21

4.2 Reduction Gears 27

4.3 Engines .

'. 29

Chapter 5» Results , 31

Chapter 6. Conclusions and Recommendations 33

Bibliography 35

Figures 37

Tab le s 50

Appendix A. Additional Inlet Data 52

Appendix 3. Sample Calculation 5^

Appendix C. Computer Program Description andUser's Guide 60

List of Program Variables 63

Program Listing 70

- 3 -

Page 8: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 9: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure No. Title Page

1 General configuration of an SES 37

2 Variation of drag with vessel speed andlift to drag ratio for surface effect ships 38

3 Propulsion system arrangement 39

4 Inlet drag coefficient for varying aspectratio inlets 40

5 Design speed overall internal efficiencyfor varying aspect ratio inlets 41

6 Hump speed overall internal efficiencyvarying aspect ratio inlets 42

7 Total inlet system weight coefficientsfor varying aspect ratio inlets 43

8 Hump speed overall internal efficiencyfor 2.5 aspect ratio inlets 44

9 Total inlet system weight coefficientfor 2.5 aspect ratio inlets 45

10 Design speed overall internal efficiencyfor 2.5 aspect ratio inlets 46

11 Inlet drag coefficient for 2.5 aspectratio inlets 47

12 Variations of propulsive coefficientwith jet velocity ratio 48

13 Correlation of Dudley's method ofestimating reduction gear weight 49

LIST OF TABLES

COMPUTER PROGRAM OUTPUT FOR JET VELOCITYRATIO =1.946 • 50

COMPUTER OUTPUT FOR VARIOUS JET VELOCITYRATIOS 51

- 4 -

Page 10: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 11: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

SYMBOLS USED IN TEXT

2A^ - Jet area ft

"P

2A_ - Pump inlet area ft

C - Ratio of entering water'smomentum velocity to ship'svelocity Vm/VQ

C^ - Acceleration coefficient

C-u, - Pump blockage coefficient

Cn- Inlet drag coefficient

Ct - Pump length coefficientpump length over pumpinlet diameter

C - Weight coefficient usedfor both inlet and pump

D - Inlet system drag lb

g - Acceleration due to gravity ft/sec'

h - Difference in height between ftoutside waterline and diffuserexit

Ha - Atmospheric pressure head ft

he - Height of diffuser exit ftabove inlet

hj_ - Head loss between diffuser ftexit and pump inlet

h - Height of pump above inlet ft

H - Change of head across pump ft

H„i - Head at enterance to pump ft

h„2 - Head at pump exit

H£ - Heat at diffuser exit ft

Hsv - Net positive suction head ft

- 5 -

Page 12: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 13: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

HP - Horsepower delivered to horsepowerP the water

K - K-factor of reduction gear

L - Length of pump ft

ir - Reduction gear ratioo

n„ - Reduction gear input pinion RPMRPM (ie engine RPI.l)

N - Suction specific speed RPM(gal/min

)

'

s

ft' 75

p - Vapor pressure of water ft

PC - Propulsive coefficient

Q - Flow rate ft-ysec

- Reduction gear Q-factor

R - Ship's resistance lb

r, - Pump hub radius ft

rh/r.- Ratio of pump hub radius

to blade tip radius

r. - Pump blade tip radius ft

RPM - Pump or engine RPM RPM

SFC - Specific fuel consumption lb/HP-hr.

SHP - Required engine power output horsepower

T - Thrust lb

t - Time interval hr

U. - Blade tip velocity ft/sec

V.: - Jet velocity ft/secJ

V./V - Jet velocity ratioJo J

V - Momentum velocity of ft/secentering water

VQ

- Ship's speed ft/sec

- 6 -

Page 14: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 15: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

V - Velocity of water ft/secz entering pump

W, - Pump weight

V/ - Weight of inlet system lb

W - Reduction gear weight lb

W - V/eight of water in pump lb

If- Density of water slug/ft

(+>- Pump flow coefficient

\f- Purnp head coefficient

TT - Pi

Q - Gear efficiency

f]n- Nozzle efficiency

^q* - Inlet system overallinternal efficiency

A7 oa ~ In le "t system overallinternal efficiency(uncorrected for height)

*?„ - Pump efficieny

2sec

- 7 -

Page 16: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 17: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

1. INTRODUCTION

Vessels wholly or partially supported by a cushion of

air are described as "surface effect ships". Recently, this

term has evolved through usage to the point where it is used

when refering to rigid sidewall captured air bubble vehicles,

while vessels with flexible sidewalls are termed "air

cushion vehicles". The rigid sidewalls together with flexible

end seals enclose the air cushion on the SE3 . Most of the

vessel's weight is supported on this cushion with the air

being supplied by lift fans. The general configuration of

the SE3 may be seen in figure 1.

By lifting the vessel's hull partially out of the water

on an air cushion the resistance of the vessel is greatly

reduced and the craft can be operated at high speeds with

reasonable power requirements. There is no one typical drag

versus speed curve for surface effect ships as the resistance

depends on many factors including length to beam ratio,

cushion pressure, sidewall length, sidewall width, and the

amount of the frontal area. The effect of varying the length

to beam ratio can be seen in figure 2. In general, it can be

said that surface effect ships have lov/er resistances than

conventional vessels and in many cases they have lower resist-

ances than hydrofoils. The high length to beam ratio 3E3 has

a lower drag over a wide range as shown in figure 2. Thus

a high length to beam ratio 3E3 might be used for vessels

operating at speeds between 35 and 60 knots and lower length

- 8 -

Page 18: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 19: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

to beam ratio ships would be used for operations above this.

One of the major problems with surface effect ships is

their propulsion systems. Operating at speeds over about 60

knots eliminated the possible use of conventional propellers

due to cavitation. Air propellers, although efficient, take

up much deck space and present a personnel hazard. In addition,

they are not very efficient at low speeds and their weight is

high. Supercavitating propellers can be efficient but they

are noisy, they vibrate, and their operation in a seaway is

uncertain. Water-jet propulsion systems are not very

efficient but relatively simple, reliable, and flexible. The

pumps, gears, and engines may be placed higher in the ship

eliminating the need to widen the sidewalls. Thus the vessel's

drag can be kept low. In addition to their poor efficiency,

the weight of the waterjet system is a drawback. The water

in the system is a significant factor in this weight.

The subject of this paper is the water-jet propulsion

system for surface effect ships. The emphasis is on the weight

and efficiency of the system. The final objective of this

thesis was to develop a computer program which would select

the optimum system for a given SES. The selection procedure

for the system is based on least total weight including the

fuel required for a given endurance. Specifically, the study

was done for the U. 3. Navy's contemplated 2000 ton 80 knot

SES but the resulting program may be used for a number of

different vessels. Previous studies have been made on water-

- 9 -

Page 20: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 21: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

jet systems for hydrofoils (see references 2,3, and 4) and

much of the information contained in the previous studies

was used for the pump and engine segments of the program.

The concentration in this paper is on the flush inlet system

which may be used for the surface effect ships and is not

applicable to the hydrofoil.

- 10 -

Page 22: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 23: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

2. SYSTEM DESCRIPTION

The water-jet propulsion system for a SES is made up of

eight components: the inlet opening and associated fairing,

a movable ramp, the diffuser, the pump, the reduction gear,

the engine, the nozzle, and necessary piping, as shown in

figure 3. The inlet is described as being flush since it

lies in the same plane as the bottom of the hull. The primary

concern here is to minimize drag while bringing the water into

the hull. The curvature of the leading edge and the raduis

of the lip are important parameters in this respect. To

prevent separation of the flow the leading edge curvature

must not be too sharp. At the same time, too shallow a bend

results in heavier systems. The lip radius should be made

as small as possible to minimize drag but is constrained by

several factors. Cavitation prevention, debris damage

resistance, and the possible need to place sensors near the

lip put lower limits on the lip size. The inlet ratio (the

ratio of the inlet width to inlet height) also effects drag.

With low aspect ratios having lower drag. At the same time,

the smaller aspect ratio inlets may require longer and heavier

transition sections after the diffuser.

The movable ramp opens the inlet at low speeds to allow

more flow through the system. The variation of area depends

on the drag characteristics of the vessel, the operating speed,

the jet velocity ratio, and other factors. In the 2000 ton

vessel example, the pov/er requirements at hump speed and at

- 11 -

Page 24: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 25: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

cruise are nearly the same, and the required flow rate of

water is nearly the same. Thus, the ratio of the inlet area

at hump to area at cruise should be about equal to the ratio

of the ship's velocity at cruise to the velocity at hump.

The diffuser, downstream of the flush inlet, slows the

flow down to prevent cavitation at the pump. Diffuser design

is crucial to the system. On one hand a shallow diffuser

angle is desired to minimize losses and on the other a shallow

angle increases the diffuser length and consequently the weight

of the system. Appendix A gives data for the diffuser used

in the study. Additional information on the inlet, diffuser,

and other design aspects of the system can be found in refer-

ence i .

The pump used in the study consists of an inducer stage

followed by one or more axial stages. The flow coefficient

of the inducer stage was set at 0.15 to give diffuser ratios

similar to those for which data was available in reference 1.

It was further assumed that there would be one engine per

pump and that all engines and pumps would be identical. Since

it v/as assumed that each engine would drive a single pump and

because of their light weight, planetary reduction gears would

be used. Further details of pumps, gears, and engines will be

presented in chapter 4.

The nozzles and additional piping of the system is not

considered in detail in the program. Provision for their

weights is made but other than allowing for an assumed nozzle

- 12 -

Page 26: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 27: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

efficiency and the difference in height between the diffuser

outlet and the pump, the head losses are ignored as being

small compared to the remainder of the system.

- 13 -

Page 28: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 29: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

3. DEVELOPMENT OF EQUATIONS

A waterjet propulsion system produces thrust by increasing

the momentum of the ingested water. Thus the thrust developed

is given by:

T =jpQ(V. - V ) (3-DJ

or, defining C = V /v° m' o

T = e^ v j/v - c)vo (3,2)

In steady state the thrust must equal the total resistance of

the ship which is the resistance of the hull plus the drag

caused by the propulsion system. Or,

T = R + D (3.3)

Reference 1 gives the drag of the inlet system in terms of a

drag coefficient, CQ . Thus,

D = CDQV f/2 (3.4)

Figure k shows the drag coefficient versus speed curves for

varying aspect ratio inlets.

Combining 3«2» 3«3i and 3.4 yields

f Q(V/Vo

" C)Vo

= R + CDQV f/2 (3.5)

V/hen the vessel is accelerating (such as over the hump region)

the thrust must be greater than the total resistance. Or,

letting C. be the acceleration coefficient, 3«5 becomes:

pQ(Vj/V - C)VQ

= C A (R + G DQV f/2) (3-6)

- lh -

Page 30: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 31: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

Where C. > 1. Equation 3.6 can then be solved for Q.

Q = CAR/PV (V-/Vo

- C - CACD/2) (3.7)

Since the power delivered to the water is given by:

HPp

= HpQ eg/550 (3.8)

and Q is given by equation 3«7 » only an expression for H ,

the head across the pump is needed.

Reference 1 defines the overall internal efficiency of

the system (Ij.,) as a measure of the head recovery between

the inlet and the diffuser outlet. Figures 5 and 6 show

Hqp' versus vessel speed for the varying aspect ratio inlets.

These curves are /]q. for infinite Froude number or diffusers

whose exits lie in the same plane as their inlets. In the

actual case, these efficiencies must be corrected for the

change in elevation between inlet and outlet. The corrected

efficiency is:

10A= V- " h/Vm/2 S- (3.9)

Therefore, the total head at the diffuser outlet is:

H2 = ^0A

V'/2g (3 * 10)

and the head at the entrance to the pump is:

Hpl

= hp " h

e+ H

2 " h lep (3.1D

Assuming that the nozzle is at the same elevation as the

pump and ignoring the nozzle efficiency, the head at the

- 15 -

Page 32: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 33: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

exit of the pump is:

H = V /2g (3.12)P2

Equations 3.1°» 3.Hi and 3.12 can be combined to get the

head rise across the pump.

2 2H = V./2g -Q n .v /2g + h - h + h (3.13)p j 'OA ra' p e lep

Making the assumption that h, (the loss between the diffuserlep

outlet and the pump entrance) is small compared to the other

terms and letting h - h be h, 3.13 becomes:

2 2 _x

2

p r oj - C "oa> VH_ = ((V./Vj - C f? 0A ) V„/2g + h (3.1*0

and substituting 3.7 and 3.1^ into 3.8 gives

HP = CRY ((V./V )

2- C

2r| + 2hg/V )

p A o J o OA o(3.15)

(550) (2) (Vj/vo

- c - cAcD/2)

The shaft horsepower required is then:

SHP = HP /0 Q n (3.16)P P g n

The propulsive coefficient is defined as the thrust divided

by the shaft horsepower. Incorporating the gear and nozzle

efficiencies into the pump efficiency PC becomes:

PC - 2 _(V./V - C - C.Cq/2 + C C / (2V ))

((YV 2- c\a + 2hs/y

o} (3 - 1?)

By taking the derivatives of 3.15 and 3«17 with respect to

- 16 -

Page 34: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 35: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

V-/V and setting the results equal to zero expressions canJ o

be found for the velocity ratios for which the required

horsepower is minimum and the propulsive coefficient is

maximum. These are :

VVo

= c + caV2 + (c + cacd/2 )

2" °

2<7 A

+

2hg/V2(3.18)

for minimum power and

YVo

= C + CACD/2 " CACD/2Vo +

- <G + C

ACD/2 " CAGD

/2V 2- °

2V + 2hgAo

(3.19)

for maximum PC. Because of the definition of PC the minimum

power does not occur at the maximum PC. The two velocity

ratios are close enough, however, that either can be used in

connection with equation 3.15 to estimate the power required

by the 3ES

.

As shown below, the problem is not as simple as just

using these equations to predict requirements. Once a jet

velocity ratio at cruise is selected from equation 3.18 or

3.19 the flow rate through the system is determined from

equation 3.7 and the area of the jet is:

Aj

= Q/tVVV 3 (3,20)

Then using a constant area jet, Q equals the jet area times

- 17 -

Page 36: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 37: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

the jet velocity and equation 3-6 can be used to solve for

the jet velocity ratio at hump.

(V./V ) Hump = .50 + C.C A +Jo " *J2

(.50 + cAcDA)2

+ cAR/(pA.v )

(3.21)

Where all terms are at the hump speed. The jet velocity

ratio is then used to determine the flow rate , head rise

across the pump and the horsepower required by use of

equations 3«7i 3»8, and 3«15 respectively. The use of a

constant area jet links the two velocity ratios together

and it is possible that by using the power optimum jet

velocity ratio at cruise will result in a velocity ratio

at hump which is far from the power optimum at hump. In

fact, with a given set of conditions there may be no possible

jet velocity ratio, at which the ship is both able to

accelerate over the hump and able to cruise at the desired

speed. In this case, either the cruise speed or the

acceleration margin would have to be reduced or larger or

more engines would have to be used. Appendix B presents

a sample calculation using the above equations and figure

12 shows the variation of propulsion coefficient with jet

velocity ratio and the range of velocity ratios which may

be used for this example.

The weight of the inlet system including the water up

to the diffuser outlet is given in reference 1 as:

- 18 -

Page 38: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 39: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

W = CWQ1,5

(3.22)

Values of C versus speed are shown in figure 7 for thew

varying aspect ratio inlets.' The weight given by equation

3.22 represents the total weight of the system including

structure, ducting, and water. Additional ducting such as

the transition pipe, pump elbow, and nozzle pipe are not

included. As can be seen from equation 3*7 the flow rate

decreases with increasing jet velocity ratio. Thus the weight

of the inlet system will decrease with increasing velocity

ratio. Since the propulsive coefficient versus velocity

ratio curve is relatively flat for high velocity ratios it

should be anticipated that the lightest system will have a

high jet velocity ratio.'

As was mentioned previously , the aspect ratio is the

ratio of the inlet v/idth to the inlet height. As used here

the term "varying aspect ratio" inlets means those with

aspect ratios equal to the sytem's diffusion ratio. Other

inlets are termed "fixed aspect ratio" inlets. The varying

aspect ratio inlets in general are more efficient and lighter.

The movable ramp is greatly simplified by using diffusion

ratios equal to the inlet aspect ratios. The area is varied

by moving the roof of the inlet. Thus, in general it is

desirable to use the varying aspect ratio inlets. In some

cases, this will not be possible due to sidehull width con-

straints. That is, using an aspect ratio equal to the

diffusion ratio could result in an inlet width which would be

- 19 -

Page 40: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 41: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

as wide or wider than the hull. In these cases smaller

aspect ratios must be used. Reference 1 presents data

on 2.5 aspect ratio inlets and it is repeated in figures

8, 9, 10, and 11.

- 20 -

Page 42: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 43: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

4. PUKPS, REDUCTION GEARS AND ENGINES

4.1 PUMPS

The pumps considered for use in SES water-jet propulsion

systems are centrifugal and axial flovi pumps. Since the

available data on the inlet system is for systems of 10,000

to 40,000 horsepower and the head rise, flow rate, and suction

specific speeds required in the system are all high, it appears

that axial flow pumps are better suited for this application.

Previous comparisons of axial flow and centrifugal pumps in

water-jet systems (ref. 2) having nearly the same requirements

show that the centrifugal pumps are usually much heavier and

their placement in the system is much more complicated.

Generally multi-parallel stages are required and the associated

gearing, shafting, and ducting is complicated and heavy.

Centrifugal pumps are, therefore, not considered in this paper.

Two factors affected the choice of axial flow pumps used

in this system. First, the data presented in reference 1 was

based on a specific pump. This was a pump whose inlet flow

coefficient is 0.15 ar>d could operate at suction specific

speeds of up to 16,000. Because the system's diffusion ratio

depends on the pump flow coefficient and the inlet system

data v/as presented for specific diffusion ratios; the use of

0.15 for the flow coefficient was dictated. The suction

specific speed is the second factor. Although pumps have been

built and operated at suction specific speeds as high as

- 21 -

Page 44: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 45: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

26,000 it was decided to limit the pumps in this system to

16,000, as being more reasonable. The pump assumed in the

calculation procedure is constrained to operate below a

specific speed of 16,000.

The above limit does not guarantee that the pump will

be cavitation free at hump speeds. Reference 5 presents data

on a pump operated up to a suction specific speed of 26,000.

It points out that although the pump had good preformance

characteristics up to this speed, cavitation was present at

about a suction specific speed of about J, 800. Cavitation

normally occurs first on the inducer stage. In general,

however, the inducer still produces enough head rise to keep

the remaining stages from cavitating. Thus, v/hen more than

one stage is used the performance of the pump is not greatly

effected by cavitation on the inducer stage. It is therefore

indicated that the pump may very well cavitate while the

vessel is accelerating, but that there should be no major

loss in performance.

Besides loss of pump performance in a cavitating regime

possible pump damage must be considered. This damage depends

both on the extent of cavitation and on the length of time the

pump is operated in this consition. More extensive test data

on pump deterioration is desirable. A study on the dynamics

of a surface effect ship using a water-jet propulsion system

was undertaken by Bruce (reference 6) and shows the accel-

eration characteristics of the vessel. Although his results

- 22 -

Page 46: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 47: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

show a long acceleration period before the vessel reached

cruise speed (about 4 minutes), the period of time spent in

the hump region is quite short (about .5 minutes). This

suggests that some cavitation can be tolerated.

Using high suction specific speeds leads to high pump

speeds (RPM). Consequently, small reduction ratios are

needed and weight is saved in the 'reduction gears. The RPM

is limited indirectly by the maximum allowable blade tip

speed. In this instance, the maximum tip speed is limited to

200 feet per second.

The head coefficients for the pump were setat 0.41 for

the inducer and 0.3 for the following stages. In an actual

pump design, the inlet flow coefficient and the head

coefficients cannot be simply arbitrarily selected. Pumps

have been built which have coefficients approximately equal

to these so they are considered reasonable even though they

may not be the optimum for all designs. Since the methods

of estimating the weight of pumps do not correspond very well

to weights of produced pumps, using slightly different

coefficients to estimate the pump size should induce very

little additional error in the total system weight . Users

of this program should be cautioned to ensure that their

particular pump requirements are reasonably satisfied by the

pump design used here.

Knowing the flow rate and head rise through the pump

from equations 3.7 and 3-13 the pump design proceeds as

follows. The flow coefficient relates the axial velocity

- 23 -

Page 48: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 49: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

of the entering water to the blade tip velocity.

<J>= v

z/u

t(4.1.1)

and the head rise coefficient relates the head rise across

the pump to the blade tip velocity.

H> = gH/U^ (4.1.2)

using equation 4.1.1 with<$= .15 and U, equal to its maximum

permissable value of 200 ft/sec, Vz

is found and then r. is

found by:

rt

= Q/Vztt(1 - (r

h/r

t)

2(4.1.3)

2 2Since the inlet area of the pump is 7/(r - r ). Knowing

r and U sets the pump. RPM (RPM = 30 U./irr, ). The suctiont t x x

specific speed is then calculated by:

Ns

= RPM Q* 5/Hg3 (4.1.4)

Where Q is in gallons/minute and H is the net positivesv

suction head

H = H + H „- p (4.1.5)

sv a pi ^v

If N exceeds 16,000 the tip velocity is reduced and r, , RPM,

and N are recalculated until N is equal to or less thans s

16,000.

The efficiency of the pump at the design speed is assumed

to be 91.5/S for a pump whose diameter is 3.66 feets. This is

the same at what is used in reference 2. As in reference 2,

- 24 -

Page 50: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 51: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

a Reynolds Number correction is applied for the actual pump

diameter to determine the pump efficiency. This efficiency

is then used to find the propulsive coefficient at hump speed

and the required shaft hors'epov/er is calculated and compared

to the available SHP. If the required SHP is less than or

equal to the available power the vessel will be able to

accelerate over the hump (the acceleration coefficient is

included in the required power) and the design may be

continued. If not, the pump blade tip speed can be reduced.

This increases the pump diameter and, therefore, the

efficiency. It also encreases the head coefficient of the

pump according to equation 4-. 1,2. The number of stages is

determined from the resulting head coefficient. That is, the

inducer is allowed a head coefficient of 0.^1 and each

subsquent stage 0.30.

The off design point pump RPM and efficiency are found

in the same manner as presented in references 2 and 3« That

is, the pump head, efficiency and RPM characteristics are

assumed parabolic. The coefficients used are the same as

those in reference 2 and the characteristics for two or three

stage pumps are assumed to be identical. After finding the

efficiency and RPM at the cruise speed, the propulsion

coefficient, required pov/er and blade tip speed are found.

The required pov/er is compared to available power and the

blade tip speed is checked against the 200 ft/sec limit. If

either of the above are unacceptable, the blade tip speed

at the hump speed is decreased and the entire procedure is

- 25 -

Page 52: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 53: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

repeated. The pump dry weight is calculated by the equation:

2 . 3W = C D (4.1.6)d w

and the weight of the water in the pump by:

ww

= CbAPLpfS ^.1.7)

Where C is a blockage coefficient and L , the pump length is

given by:

L = G T D (4.1.8)P L

In general, increasing the pump diameter or decreasing the

blade tip speed increases the pump efficiency slightly and

greatly increases the pump weight.

- 26 -

Page 54: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 55: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

4.2 REDUCTION GEARS

It is assumed that planetary reduction gears will be used

in these systems. Since the LM 2500 gas turbine which is

being considered for use on the United States Navy's 2000 ton

SES puts out a maximum of 22,500 shaft horsepower the gears

must be capable of transmitting this. The feasibility of

planetary gears of this size has been demonstrated by a

40,000 SHP gear built by Curtiss-Wright

.

The weight of the reduction gear is estimated using the

Dudley method. The weights obtained from this method correlate

well with existing gears. Two factors (K and Q) are used in

the method. An important portion of the tooth stress is

proportional to the square root of the gear's K-factor. The

range of K-factors which are reasonable for use on surface

effect ships is between 400 and 800.

The second factor, Q, is defined as:

Q = HP (mg

+ l)3 /n

pmg

(4.2.1)

V/here m is the reduction ratio, n is the speed of the input

pinion in RPK and HP is the shaft horsepower. In effect, this

definition relates the gear's required geometry to the weight.

The resulting weight equation for planetary gears is:

Wg

= 9500 Q/K (4.2.2)

Figure 13 shows the weight correlation for a limited number of

gears. The weights given by 4.2.2 include the gear, casing,

- 27 -

Page 56: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 57: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

oil reservoir, oil pump, and stub shaft but not the oil or

necessary foundation.

- 28 -

Page 58: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 59: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

h.J. ENGINES

Gas turbine engines designed for or modified for marine

use may be employed in water- jet systems. Although high speed

diesels may be used, in general they are heavier and have not

been considered. This may not be a valid assumption in all

circumstances when the total system is considered. Some gas

turbines have very poor specific fuel consumptions and the

added weight of required fuel may offset the engine weight

saved by using the lighter weight turbine. The twelve engines

used in references 2 and 3 are again used here with the same

characteristics. That is, normal SHP, maximum SHP, specific

fuel consumption, shaft RPM, and engine dry weight are inputs

to the program. As in references 2 and 3 the specific fuel

consumption is assumed to vary with the ratio of SHP to normal

SHP raised to a power, n. The value of the power, n, changes

when this power ratio is 0.7. Since the pump RPMs at cruise

and hump speed are determined by the pump design as are the

power requirements, it is assumed that the engine can develop

the required power at the corresponding shaft speeds. No

consideration of the engine's power versus RPM characteristics

is made. These assumptions may not be valid for all engines

or all operating ranges and once again the user is cautioned.

The fuel consumption is found by dividing the endurance

time into steps. The fuel required for each step is:

Wf

= (SFC) (SHP) (t) (4.3.1)

- 29 -

Page 60: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 61: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

When the weight for one time period is found, it is subtracted

from the vessels weight and the resistance of the vessel is

recalculated using a constant lift to drag ratio. The

resistance of an actual SE3 -will not vary in this way but will

decrease as weight is removed (L/D will not he constant.

Reference 7). To show some decrease in resistance and because

of the fact that the weight of the fuel used by the lift fans

is ignored in the program, the above assumption seems reason-

able. Accounting accurately for the lift fan fuel and the

decreasing resistance of the vessel would be possible but

extremely complicated. On the other hand, since the fuel makes

up a substantial amount of the total ship weight its expenditure

is significant.

Since the jet area- is fixed, Q = V.A. and equation 3J J

becomes

:

A.p(V* - VmV.)= R + CnP A jV jV

o/2 (4.3.2)

and can be solved for V.. R is the new resistance after the

fuel is removed. Then assuming the pump efficiency remains

constant, the shaft horsepower required is:

gA.V. (V*/2g - V^ n0A/2g _ h )

SH? = J J J (4.3.3)

550 n p ng n n

The fuel required for the next time interval is calculated

using this horsepower.

- 30 -

Page 62: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 63: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

5. RESULTS

Table 1 is output from the computer program for the 2000

ton 80 knot test case and for jet velocity ratio equal to

1.9463. Table 2 shows a summary of data for the same vessel

and a variety of jet velocity ratios.

In the weight summary it should be noted that the inlet

system and the fuel (1000 mile range) make up 86.7;% of the

total system weight. In addition, the inlet system's drag

makes up about 7% of the total resistance. In this run the

pumps were assumed to be at the same height as the diffuse

f

outlet and, therefore, the additional water weight is zero.

Based on the assumptions in chapter 4 , the transition pipe

would add about 3»130 pounds of water for each foot which

the pump is elevated above the diffuser outlet. Therefore,

even a 10 foot difference would have little effect on the

total weight. Since the engine (LM2500) used in this case

has an excellant specific fuel consumption (.41 at normal

horsepov/er ) , the fuel weight represents a minimum weight.

It is doubtful that any significant saving in weight could be

made by using high speed diesel engines or any other turbine.

The pump flow rates at cruise and hump speeds are nearly

identical as are the pump heads. This results in nearly

equal efficiencies at the two conditions. The pump runs only

about ^-0 RPK slov/er at cruise speed than at hump speed and

because of the high pump speed (about 1200 RPM) a reduction

gear ratio of only 2.79 is required. The resulting reduction- 31-

Page 64: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 65: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

gear is lightweight. The required engine speed and horsepower

changes between hump speed and cruise speed correspond well

with the engine's performance characteristics.

The inlet data shows that the movable ramp must move

about 1.72 feet to admit the necessary flow at hump speed.

This seems reasonable. It should also be noted that the width

of the inlet is 4-.1? feet. This should cause no problems in

the design of the sidehulls. The required diffusion ratio

is ^.016^ and the data used in the program was based on a

diffusion ratio of 4 for an 80 knot ship.

The summary of data for various jet velocity ratios

(table 2) dramatizes the affect which the velocity ratio has

on the weight ratio, propulsive coefficient, and power

requirements. The maximum propulsive coefficient occurs at

velocity ratio equal to 1,8263 as does minimum cruise horse-

power. According to equation 3-19 the propulsive coefficient

should be maximum at jet velocity ratio equal to I.8O63. In

the developement of equation 3»19 it was assumed that the

pump efficiency is independent of jet velocity ratio. In the

program the pump efficiency is dependent on the velocity

ratio and as a result the maximum propulsive coefficient

occurs at a higher velocity ratio.

- 32

Page 66: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 67: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

6. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The high weight of the water-jet propulsion system is a

drawback to its use. The water in the system and the required

fuel make up the largest portion of the weight. As can be

seen from the results presented previously, using a higher

jet velocity ratio reduces the weight of the system without

seriously affecting the overall propulsive coefficient. In

most cases it appears that to obtain the least weight system

the velocity ratio should be set at its highest possible value.

This limit occurs when the power required to accelerate or

cruise exceeds the available power.

The low efficiency of the system contributes to the high

weight of fuel. Only about 7$ of the total drag of the vessel

is due to the inlet system. Although it may be possible to

reduce this through the use of a better design, little saving

of weight would be achieved. An increase in the overall

internal efficiency of the diffuser will result in a lighter

system. However, a 10/o increase in the internal efficiency

will result in less than a 1% increase in the propulsive

coefficient and thus reduce the system's v/eight.

In summary, it appears that although some improvements

may be made in the flush inlet water-jet system, the saving

in weight will be small. The drag of the inlet, the internal

efficiency of the diffuser, and the pump efficiency may be

improved. The drag is already low and the efficiencies are

high, so little improvement should be expected.

- 33 -

Page 68: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 69: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

More experimental data on inlets and diffusers is needed.

As is more data on axial flow pumps. This data should then

be incorporated into the computer program. It is also

recommended that the weight of the lift fans and their required

fuel also be added to the program, along with a more accurate

method of predicting the variation of drag as weight is

removed. An arrangement feasability study is also needed.

The effects of splitting the flow between the pumps should be

included in this.

- 34 -

Page 70: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 71: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

BIBLIOGRAPHY

1. Barr, R.A., Systematic Calculations of the Performanceof Flush Inlets for Surface Effect Ships, Hydronautics

,

Incorporated, Technical Report 722U--4, October 1973.

2. Percival, R.C., Optimization of Waterjet Propulsion Pumpsfor Hydrofoil Application, Ocean Engineer Thesis, M.I.T.,May 1972.

3. Kruse , D.K. , Analysis of a Method for Optimum Design ofWaterjet Propulsion Systems, Ocean Engineer Thesis, M.I.T.,June 1973.

^. Gill, R.P., Design Optimization of Waterjet PropulsionSystems for Hydrofoils, Ocean Engineer Thesis, M.I.T.,May 1972.

5. Sandercock, D.M. and Crouse , J.E., Design and OverallPerformance of a Two-stage Axial-flow Pump with aTandem-row Inlet Stage, NASA, TN D-2879, June I965.

£ Bruce, R.H., Modeling, Simulation and Control of WaterJet Propulsion for Surface Effect Ships (SES), OceanEngineer Thesis, M.I.T. 197^

7. Conceptual Design Handbook for Surface Effect Ships,Surface Effect Ship Program Office, Washington, D.C.,February 1973.

8. Muench, R.K., Artie Surface Effect Vehicle ProgramParametric Data on a Mechanical Transmission Suitablefor Large Surface Effect Vehicles, NSRDC , Report 27-650, '73

9. Dewey, W.A. , Conceptual Design for Surface Effect Ships(SES) in Coast Guard Application, NSRDC, Technical NoteAL-311, September 1973.

10. Barr, R.A., and Etter, R.J., Selection of PropulsionSystems for High Speed Advanced Marine Vehicles, AIAAPaper 7^-33^. February 197^.

11. McBride, M.W. and Gearhart, W.3., Preliminary Pump DesignStudies for Waterjet Propulsion Applications, NavalOrdinance Systems Command, Technical Memorandum FileTM 7^-03, January 197^.

12. Butler, E.A., An Advanced Concept for Propeller-drivenSurface Effect Ships (SES), Naval Engineers Journal,vol. 85, no. 5, pp53, October 1973.

- 35 -

Page 72: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 73: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

13. Brown, J., and Traskel, J., Waterjet Propulsion SystemStudy, Renort no. 5i System and Design and Analysis,Lockhead Contract N0.-886O5. Lockheed Report LR 17885-5Sept. 1965.

14. Arcand , L. , and Comolli, C. , Optimization of WaterjetProoulsion for High Speed Ships, Journal of Hydronautics

,

vol". 2, no. 1, pp. 2-8, 1968/

15. Stepanoff, A.J., Centrifugal and Axial Flow Pumps Theory,Desian, and Application. John Wiley and Sons, New York,19577

16. Shepherd, D.G. , Elements of Fluid Mechanics, Harcourt,Brace and World Inc., Mew York, Chicago, Burlingame,1965.

17. Duport, J., Visconti, M. , and Merle, J., Water-JetPropulsion for High Speed Surface Ships, Presented tothe Hinth Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Paris, 1972.

18. Brandau, J.H. , Performance of Waterjet Propulsion System -

A Review of the State-of-the-Art , Journal of Hydronautics,vol. 2, no, 2, April I968.

- 36 -

Page 74: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 75: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

WET DECK

AIR CUSHION

f \s

MAIN DECK

3IDEHULL

FRONT VIEW

FORWARD SEAL

AFT SEAL AIR CUSHION

SIDE VIEW

Figure 1 - GENERAL CONFIGURATION OF AN SES

- 37 -

Page 76: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 77: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

oM<KEh

M

<!

o

.10.

.08-

.06.

.04

02

VB=2

20 40 60

Speed - Knots

80 100

Figure 2 - VARIATION OF DRAG V/ITH VESSEL SPEED AND LIFTTO DRAG RATIO FOR SURFACE EFFECT SHIPS

- 38 -

Page 78: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 79: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

Figure 3 - PROPULSION SYSTEM ARRANGEMENT

- 39 -

Page 80: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 81: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

0.3

0.2

'D

0.1

15

/V= 100 KNOTS

V= BO KNOTS

V= 60 KNOTS

23

SHIP HUMP SPEED - KNOTS75

Figure h - INLET DRAG COEFFICIENT FOR VARYING APECT RATIOINLETS, (ref. 1)

- 1+0 -

Page 82: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 83: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

0.65

0.60

1 0A

0.55

0.50

.

j

V= 100 KNOTS ,

V= 80 KNOTS

V=-60 KNOTS

>. .._ .. _..

15 25

SHIP HUMP SPEED - KNOTS

35

Figure 5 - DESIGN SPEED OVERALL INTERNAL EFFICIENCYFOR VARYING ASPECT RATIO INLETS

- kl -

Page 84: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 85: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

0.80

0.75

' 0A

0.70

0.65

V= 8 KNOTS

^ /

/

V= 100 KNOTS

/V= 60 KNOTS

*

15 25

SHIP HUMP SPEED - KNOTS

35

Figure 6 - HUMP SPEED OVERALL INTERNAL EFFICIENCYVARYING ASPECT RATIO INLETS

- 1*2 -

Page 86: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 87: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

15

10

'W

60 80

SHIP DESIGN SPEED - KNOTS

100

Figure 7 - TOTAL INLET SYSTEM WEIGHT COEFFICIENT FORVARYING ASPECT RATIO INLETS

- if3 -

Page 88: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 89: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

0.75

0.70-

n0A

0.65

0.601

SHIP HUMP SPEED - KNOTS

Figure 8 - HUMP SPEED OVERALL INTERNAL EFFICIENCYFOR 2.5 ASPECT RATIO INLETS

- 44 -

Page 90: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 91: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

15

10

w /"

60 80 100

SHIP DESIGN SPEED - KNOTS

Figure 9 - TOTAL INLET SYSTEM WEIGHT COEFFICIENTFOR 2.5 ASPECT RATIO INLETS

- 45 -

Page 92: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 93: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

0.65-

o.6o

n'OA

0.55

0.50

SHIP HUMP SPEED - KNOTS

Figure 10 - DESIGN SPEED OVERALL INTERNAL EFFICIENCYFOR 2.5 ASPECT RATIO INLETS

- 1*6 -

Page 94: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 95: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

0.3

0.2

'D

0.1

15

V= 100 KNOTS

Y= 60 KNOTS

V= 80 KNOTS

25

SHIP HUMP SPEED - KNOTS

35

Figure 11 - INLET DRAG COEFFICIENT FOR 2.5 ASPECT

RATIO INLETS

. U 7 -

Page 96: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 97: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

.6 -

,5-

p.c.

.4-

<_HUMP SPEED LIMIT (ABOVE THIS

VELOCITY RATIO THE VESSEL IS

UNABLE TO ACCELERATE OVER THE

HUMP)

RANGE IN WHICH<— VESSEL CAN CRUI3I

AT DESIGN SPEED

-> ALLOWABLERANGE

<-

DragDragaOAl

JET VELOCITY RATIO(CRUISE SPEED)

230,000325,000.557.577.141.2

lb.lb.

^OA2^D

=

CA=

EngineEngineSix engines

atatC

r? P

In

8030

knotsknots.984.915.98.98

normal horsepower :

maximum horsepower= 22,200= 22,500

Figure 12 - VARIATIONS 0? PROPULSIVE COEFFICIENT WITH JET

VELOCITY RATIO

- 48 -

Page 98: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 99: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

10000-

/A

1000.

WEIGHTlb.

/ *

100 -

a

B

10 . - " r

i 1

*

»

.1 1.0 10

Q - factor

100 1000

Open symbol: simple planetary gearsClosed symbol: compound gears(Reference °)

Figure 13 - CORRELATION OF DUDLEY'S METHOD OF ESTIMATINGREDUCTION GEAR WEIGHT

- ^ 9 -

Page 100: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 101: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

TABLE 1

COMPUTER PROGRAM OUTPUT

JET VELOCITY RATIO = 1.946

WEIGHTS

PUMPS DRY = 29310.

PUMP WATER = 67^0.

INLET SYSTEM = 139254.

TOTAL WEIGHT = 850481.

ENGINES = 63000.

FUEL = 597913.

REDUCTION GEARS = 14262.

ADDITIONAL WATER = 0.

PUMP DATA

NUMBER OF STAGES

PUMP EFFICIENCY-CRUISE

S. SPEC. SPEED-CRUISE

PUMP HEAD - CRUISE

PUMP INLET DIAMETER

FLOW COEFFICIENT-CRUISE

TIP VELOCITY-CRUISE

PUMP FLOW-CRUISE

3

91.14

6260.

921.7

2.849

.1565

175.7

159.5

INLET DRAG - CRUISE = 17764.

INLET AREA - CRUISE = 4.332

INLET HEIGHT - CRUI3E= I.O38

INLET WIDTH = 4.171

VARIABLE AREA FACTOR = 2.657

PUMP RPM-CRUISE =1177.

PUMP EFFICIENCY-HUMP =91.13

N.P.3.H. - CRUISE =186.0

PUMP HEAD - HUMP =1036.

PUMP LENGTH . =5.784

FLOW COEFFICIENT-HUMP =.1500

TIP VELOCITY-HUMP =182.0

PUMP FLOW -HUMP =158.4

TOTAL RESIST. -CRUISE * 247764

INLET AREA-HUMP = 11.51

INLET HEIGHT-HUMP = 2.760

INLET DIFFUSION RATIO = 4.016

REDUCTION GEAR RATIO = 2.787

- 50 -

Page 102: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 103: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

TABLE 2

COMPUTER OUTPUT FOR VARIOUS JET VELOCITY RATIOS

VELOCITYRATIO

WEIGHTRATIO

PROPULSIVECOEFFICIENT(OVERALL)

HORSEPOWERHUMP

HORSEPOWERCRUISE

PUMPRPMHUMP

1.6063 0.2306 0.^719 17586.8 20150.7 1007.7

1.6263 0.2260 0.4751 17837.6 20009.3 1021.8

1.6463 0.2219 0.4778 18088.

3

19889.3 1035.7

1.6663 0.2182 0.4801 18338.8 19788.3 1049.3

1.6863 0.2147 0.4820 18589.1 19704.0 1062.7

1.7063 0.2116 0.4836 18839.3 1963^.8 1075.3

1.7263 0.2087 0.4849 19089.3 19578.9 1088.3

1.7463 0.2072 0.4859 19339.2 19535.2 1101.5

1.7663 0.2048 0.4866 19588.9 19502.4 1114.1

1.7863 0.2025 0.4870 19838.3 19479.5 1126.4

1.8063 0.2005 0.4873 20087.6 19465.6 1138.7

1.8263 0.1985 0.4873 20336.7 19^59.8 1150.7

1.8463 O.I968 0.4872 20585.7 19461.6 1162.6

I.8663 0.1952 0.4869 20334.5 19470.2 1174.3

I.8863 0.1937 0.4865 21083.1 19485.0 1185.9

I.9063 0.1923 O.^J-859 21331.6 19505.7 1197.4

1.9263 0.1910 0.4852 21579.9 19531.7 1203.7

1.9463 0.1898 0.4843 21828.1 19562.6 1219.9

- 51 -

Page 104: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 105: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

APPENDIX A

ADDITIONAL INLET SYSTEM INFORMATION

Reference 1 is a report on calculated performance of

flush inlet systems. It is a study of how various system

parameters affect the inlet system's performance. The para-

meters studied include: the ship's hump speed and design

speed, flow rate through the system, variable area factor,

lip leading edge radius, aspect ratio, diffusion ratio,

diffusion schedule, sidehull geometry, and the ratio of

inlet width to fairing width.

The results of the study show that the most important

factors affecting the inlet drag are the lip leading edge

radius and the variable area factor. The leading edge must

be sized to prevent cavitation and the onset of cavitation

is determined by the velocity of the entering water. Since

this velocity is in part controlled by the area of the inlet,

the variable area factor and the lip leading edge radius are

coupled. The inlet aspect ratio also affects the inlet drag,

with smaller aspect ratio inlets having lower drag coefficients.

The internal efficiency is greatly affected by the diffuser

schedule. The schedule used here is as follows:

First 20 percentof length Diffusion = 6°

20 to 95 percent

of length Diffusion = 6° + 12°x (p-20 )/75

95 to 100 percent,o

of length Diffusion = 18 x(100-p)/5

- 52 -

Page 106: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 107: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

Where p is the pecent of total diffuser length measured

from the inlet opening. The use of a smaller diffuser angle

will result in higher efficiency but longer and heavier systems.

The internal efficiency at 'hump speed increases with increasing

hump speed.

The study covers cruise speeds between 60 and 100 knots

and hump speeds between 15 and 35. knots. In general, the

vessel's speed has very little influence on the system's drag

and efficiency coefficients. The results of the study indicate

that the performance coefficients of the system are only

slightly affected by jet velocity ratio or by power levels.

The power levels considered are between 1,000 and ^0,000

horsepower.

It should be noted that the results are based on a

minimum amount of data and apply to specific designs. They

should be used only for designs similar to the one assumed

here. Future data may widen the range of application.

- 53 -

Page 108: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 109: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

APPENDIX: B SAMPLE CALCULATION

The following sample calculation of the computer program

is based on a ship having the following characteristics:

Resistance = 230,000 pounds at 80 knots

= 325,000 pounds at 30 knots

Displacement = 2000 ton Range = 1000 miles

Diffuser outlet height = pump height =6.5 feet.

Height of waterline =2.0 feet.

Inlet aspect ratio is variable.

Six LM 2500 gas turbine engines are used.

The acceleration coefficient at hump is 1.2.

From Subroutine SE3IN CDINl = .1399ETA1 = .57535ETA2 = .69CWIN = ^+.9

C = .984

V0(1) = (80) (1.689) = 135. ft/sec

V0(2) = =50.7 ft/sec

C0R1 = (4.5)(2)(32.2)/(135)(135)(.9B*0(.984) = .0164

C0R2 = = .1128

ETA0A(1) = .5735 - .0164 = .5571

ETA0A(2) = = . 577

The portion of the program which compares the number of engines

required uses the velocity ratio for maximum propulsive co-

efficient.

FACT = .984 + .1399/2 - .1399/(2) (135) = I.053

VJV0 (1) = 1.053 +/( 1.053) (1.053) - (.984) (.9^) (.557)

- 54 -

Page 110: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 111: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

VJVO(l) = 1.806. Which is the velocity ratio for maximum PRG

.

Using an assumed pump efficiency of . 9t PRC is:

PRC = (1.73)(1.B06 - .984 - .1399/2 + .1399/(2) (135)

)

(1.806)(1.806) - (.98*0 (.5571)

= .487

The power required must be less than or equal to the available

power. The required power is:

(230,000)(135) + (.1399)(230,000)/(2(1.806 -.984 -.1399/2))

= 3.112xl0 7 ft-lb/sec.

The avalable power is:

(22,200)(.487)(550)(6) = 3.56xl0 7 ft-lb/sec.

Therefore, six engines are sufficient to power the vessel at

cruise speed. Having determined this, the program would

subtract a designated amount from VJV0(1) and call subroutine

PUMP. Since the least weight system in this example occurs at

VJV0(1) = 1.946, this velocity ratio will be used for the

sample calculation of subroutine PUMP.

Q(l) = 230, 000/(1. 99)(135)(1. 946 - .984 - .1399/2)

= 958 ft 3/sec.

ajet = 958/(1. 946) (135) = 3.655 ft2

FACT = .5 + 1.2(.1399)/4 = .54199

VJ 1rvo(2) = .54199 +J (.54199) 2 + 1.2(320,000) ?V 1.99(3.655)(50.7)

= 5.14

Q(2) = (3.655)(5.14)(50.7) = 950 ft 3/sec.

QQ(1) = 958/6 = 159.5 ft 3/sec/pump

QQ(2) = =158.4 ft 3/sec/pump

- 55 -

Page 112: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 113: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

HPP(l) = ((1.9^6)(1.Q46) - (.984)2(.557D)(135r/64.4

= 921 ft.

HPP(2) = ((5.1*0(5.1*0 - .577)(50.7)2/64.4

= 1.31 ft.

HSV(l) = 33. + (.984)2(.5571)(135)

2/64.4 = 186 ft.

H3V(2) = 33. + (.577)(50.7)2/64.4 = 56. 1 ft.

QX = 159.5A58.4 = I.007

HX = 921/1031 = 0.8933

Using VTIP = 182 ft/sec.

RTIP = 158. 4/(3. I4l6)(182)(.15)(l. - .09) = 1.42 ft.

RPM(2) = 182(60)/(1.42)(2)(3.l4l6) = 1220 rpm

SSS = (1220)(158.4)' 5/ (56. I)* 75 = 749

* note: This suction specific speed is 15 f 900 in the usual

dimensions of rpm (gal/rain)" /ft' and below the

16,000 limit.

SHI = (32.2)(1031)/(182)2

= 1.002. Therefore,

NSTG = 3

CA = 1.0(.5)/1.0 = .5

CB = -1.0

RX = -.5(1.007) +n/(1.007)2((.5)

2+ 1.0) + .8933

= .9664

ETAP(2) = 1.0 -((3.666/(2)(1.42)),:L 5

(1.0 - .915))

= .9113

PRC(2) = 2.0(.9P)2 (.9U3)(5.14 - 1. - . 1399(1. 2)/2

+ . 1399(1. 2)/(2)(50.7))/((5.l4)2

- .577)

= .2748

- 56 -

Page 114: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 115: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

The required power at hump speed is

:

(325,O0O)(5O.7)(1.2) + (1.2)(.1399)(325,000)2(5.14 - 1. -1.2(.1399)/2)

= 1.97xi0 7 ft-lb/sec.

The available power is:

(55'0) (.2748) (22, 500) (6) = 2.04xl0 7 ft-lb/sec.

Therefore, there is sufficient power to accelerate over the

hump

.

ETAX = -1.7(1.007)2

+ 3.42(1.007) - .72 = 1.0004

ETAP(l) = .9113) (1.0004) = .9114

PRC(l) = 2(.98) (.9H4)(1.946 -.98 - .1399/2 +.1399/2(135)(1.946)(1.946) - .557K.984)(.984)

= .481

The power required at cruise speed is:

230,000(135) + . 1399(230, 000)/2(l. 946 -.984 -.1399/2)

= 3.106xl0 7 ft-lb/sec.

and the avalable power is:

(550)(.4F1)(22,200)(6) = 3.524xl0 7 ft-lb/sec.

and the vessel has sufficient power to cruise at the design

speed of 80 knots.

RPM(l) = (1220) ( .96643) =1179 rpm.

VTIP(l) = 1179(2)(3.l4l6)(1.42)/60 = 175.3 ft/sec.

Call subroutine WEIGHT. (NSTG = 3)

XLP =2.03

cw = 439.5

D13 = 2.84 ft.

The pump dry weight is:

XWD = (439.5)(2.P.4) 2,3 (6) = 29,089 lb.

- 57 -

Page 116: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 117: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

PLP = (2.84)(2.03) = 5.76 ft.

APUP = (.785)(2.84)2(.9l) = 5.76 ft

2

The weight of the water in the pump is:

XWW = (0.523)(5.76)2(1.99)(32.2)(6) = 6,671 lb.

The weight of the inlet system is:

XWIN = (4.9)(958)1,5

= 139,000. lb.

XWENG =63,000. lb.

GERAT = 34-00/1220 = 2.78

SHP(l) = (1.99)(32.2)(958)(921. ) _ . , hTi/mimtJ550(6)(.9ll-':)(.98)(.98) " 19,573 hp/pump

SHP(2) = (1.99)(32.2)(950)(103D = 21 730 ho/oumo(550)(6)(.9113)(.9S)f.98)

21,73 ° hp/ pump

The reduction gear q-factor is

:

RQ = 21,730 (3.78) 3_

3400 (2.78) ~ 122*. 16

and the resulting reduction gear weight is:

XV.'GR = (9500) (124.16) (6 )/( 500) =14,155 lb.

S3S1 = (1179)(159.5)' 5/(186)' 75 = 295.6

or, in standard units, 33S1 = 6,267.

CAL = 230,000/(2000)(2240) = .051

VOTERI/I = 135. + 135(.1399)/2 = 144.5

ETERM = .554 (135)2/ 64.4 =157.

SC0NT = 1. 99(32. 2)(3.655)/550(.9H4)(.98)2

= .487

TI = 1000(1. 689)/135(20) = .625 hr.

VJ = 144.5/2 4\/l^4.5)""/4 + . 051 (2240) (2000 )/l. 99 (3. o55)

= 262 ft/sec.

- 58 -

Page 118: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 119: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

SHNG = .487(262) ( (262)2/64.4 - 137)/6 = 19,500 hp.

SFC = .41/(19, 500/22, 200)* 25.423 lb/hp-hr

WT(1) = . 423(19, 500)(.625)(6) = 31,050 lb.

Which is the weight of fuel, for che first time interval. The

weight of fuel for the entire mission is:

XWF = 593,000 lb.

WTRAT = (29089 + 66?1 +139000 + 63000 -f 598OOO)2240(2000) '-

= .189

WT0T = .189(2000)(2240) = 850,000. lb.

Return to subroutine PUMP.

PHI1 = 159.5(l'q 2)(.15)/175.3(158.4) = .156

XDRAG = .1399(1.99) (958) ( 135 )/2 = 18,000 lb.

RESIST = 230,000 + 18,000 = 248,000 lb.

Return to main program.

AINLET = 958/135 (.8) (2) =4.33 ft2

AD = 5.76(6)/2 = 17.3 ft2

DR = 17.3/4.33 =4.0

VAF = 950/50. 7(.8)(4.33)(2) = 2.7

AR = DR = 4.0

HIN = V 4. 33/4 = 1.04 ft

AIN2 = 2.7(4.33) = 11. 7 ft2

HTN2 = 2.7(1.04) = 2.8 ft

- 59 -

Page 120: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 121: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

APPENDIX C

COMPUTER PROGRAM DESCRIPTION AND USER'S GUIDE

The computer program consists of the main program and

three subroutines. After reading in the data on the ship,

engines, and inlet system as described below, the main program

calls subroutine SESIN. This subroutine computes the inlet

system's internal efficiencies at hump and cruise speeds and

the inlet drag coefficient for the inlet specified. It returns

these and "CU" which is the ratio of the entering water's

momentum velocity to the vessel's speed.

The main program then computes the jet velocity ratio

for maximum propulsive coefficient. Using the resulting

velocity ratio and an assumed pump efficiency of .90 and

nozzle and gear efficiences of . 98 , the program computes the

number of engines required.

Since the jet velocity ratio is the only system variable,

the program is quite simple. The velocity ratio is varied in

steps and subroutine PUMP is called. Subroutine PUMP returns

the systems weight ratio and other data. The velocity ratio

is increased until either the number of required pump stages

exceeds three or the required power at either hump or cruise

speeds exceeds the available power. The calculated data is

then printed out and execution terminates.

Subroutine PUMP uses the equations developed in chapters

3 and Ur to find the required flow rates, pump heads, and net

positive suction heads at cruise and hump speeds for the given- 60 -

Page 122: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 123: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

jet velocity ratio. It then designs the pump using these values

and the tip velocity and suction specific speeds constraints.

The pump is designed at hump speed to meet the stated criter-

ion. The pump efficiency is determined by the pump diameter

and a test is made to determine if sufficient power is

available to accelerate over the hump. If there is sufficient

power, the cruise speed performance is calculated, the pump is

tested, and subroutine WEIGHT is called.

Subroutine WEIGHT uses the equations developed in chapter

4 to calculate the system weight. The exit angle of the

diffuser is assumed to be 45 degrees and the transition pipe

between the diffuser and the pump is assumed to be straight.

The length of the pipe is then 1.414 times the difference in

height betv/een the diffuser and pump. The weight of the v/ater

in the pipe is calculated using this length. The user may

wish to vary this angle and include other weights such as the

v/eight of the pipe itself or a nozzle weight (XWPIP).

The user of the program must supply the following inputs

to the program:

1. Engine performance data. The first twelve datacards in the program at present are engine datacards. (See "LIST OF PROGRAM VARIABLES, PERF(N.IENGN)", BELOW.)

2. A data card containing:IENGN - The t^'oe of engine to be usedIAR - Tne type of inlet to be usedNGT - The number of engines to be used (optional)

3. A data card containing:HE - The height of the diffuser exit above

the inlet in feet

- 61 -

Page 124: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 125: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

HEP - The height of the pump above theinlet in feet.

HEW - The height of the outside waterlineabove the inlet in feet.

CAC - The acceleration coefficient.

*+, A data card containing:VO (1) - The ship's cruise speed in knotsVO (2) - The ship's hump speed in knotsDRAG (1) - The hull drag at cruise speed in poundsDRAG (2) - The hull drag at hump speed in poundsDISP - The ship's displacement in long tonsRANGE - The range in nautical miles

- 62 -

Page 126: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 127: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

LIST OF PROGRAM VARIABLES

AD

AINLET

AIN2

AJET

APUP

AR

C

CAC

CAL

CDIN1

CDIN (I)

COR1

COR 2

CU

CW

CV/IN

D1S

DCO?

DEL

- Diffuser outlet area ft'

- Inlet area at cruise speed ft'

- Inlet area at hump speed ft'

- Jet area ft'

- Pump inlet area ft'

- Inlet aspect ratio

- =(CU) 2 The square of theratio of the momentumvelocity of entering waterto the ship's velocity

- Acceleration coefficient

- Ratio of ship's drag todisplacement

- Inlet drag coefficientat cruise speed

- Inlet drag coefficient

- Correction factor for ETAOA(1)

- Correction factor for ETAOA(2)

- Ratio of momentum velocityof inlet water to ship'svelocity

- Pump v/eight coefficient

- Inlet system weight coefficient

- Pump inlet diameter

- Inlet drag coefficient(subroutine v/eight)

- Increment of change injet velocity ratio

- 63 -

Page 128: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 129: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

DIS(l)

DISP

DR

DRAG (I)

DRAT

ENETA

ETA1

ETA 2

ETAOA (I)

ETAP (I)

ETAX

G

GERAT

HA

HE

HEP

HEW

Displacement after removing lbfuel

Displacement - entered inlong tons converted topounds

Diffusion ratio

Ship's drag lb

Ratio of pump's inlethub radius to blade tipradius

Overall internal efficiencytimes the square of the ratioof momentum velocity to shipvelocity (used in subroutineweight)

»

ftOA a-t cruise speed

lOA a "t hump speed

i?oa

Pump efficiency

Ratio of off design pointpump efficiency to designpoint efficiency

Acceleration due to gravity ft/sec^

Reduction gear ratio

Atmospheric pressure head ft

Height of diffuser outlet ftabove baseline

Height of pump above ftbaseline

Height of outside water- ftline above baseline

HI?! Inlet height (dimension)at cruise speed

ft

- 64 -

Page 130: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 131: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

HIN2

HPP ( I

)

HSV(I)

HX

IAR

ICONT

IENGN

IPRINT

IREAD

ISTEER

IAST

NGT

NSTG

PC ( L , M

)

PCA ( L , M

)

PCI MAX

PC 2MAX

PC1VJ

- Inlet height (dimension)at hump speed ft

- Head across pump ft

- Net positive suction head ft

- Ratio of pump head at cruiseto pump head at hump

- Input to program= 1 for 2.5 aspect ratio inlets= 2 for varying aspect ratio inlets

- Program control

- Type of gas turbine= 1 - TF 35= 2 - TF kO= 3 - Proteus, 1500 RPM= h - Proteus, 1000 RPM= 5 - Tyne 1A= 6 - Tyne 1C= 7 - FT12 A= 8 - LM 1500= 9 - LM 2500=10 - FT4A-2C=11 - FT4A-12=12 - FT4C-2

- Output device number

- Input device number

- Program control

- Program control

- Number of gas turbines

- Number of pump stages

- Inducer stage characteristics

- Axial stages characteristics

- Maximum overall propulsive coefficient

- Maximum 'false' propulsive coefficient(ship's hull drag times cruise speed/5503HP)

- Jet velocity ratio for PCI MAX

- 65 -

Page 132: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 133: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

PC2VJ

PCOEF (J,K)

PERF (N.IENCN)

PHI

PHI1

PI

PLP

PRC (I)

PRC1

PRNC1

Q (I)

QQ (I)

QX

RANGE

RESIST

RHOW

- Jet velocity ratio forPC2MAX

- Pump length and weightcoefficients

- Engine data where N is

1 - Normal SHP

2 - Maximum SHP

3 - SFC At normal SHP

k - RPM

5 - Weight of engine (dry)

- Pump flow coefficient athump speed

- Pump flow coefficient atcruise speed

- Constant = 3.1^-15927

- Pump length

- Propulsive coefficient(overall)

- Propulsive coefficient(overall) main program

- Propulsive coefficient(false) main program

- Flow rate through system

- Flow rate through eachpump

- Ratio of flow rate atcruise speed to flowrate at hump speed

- Ships Range

- Total resistance of shipincluding inlet drag

- Density of water

- 66 -

HP

HPlb

HP - hr

RPM

lb

ft

ftr/sec

ft3/sec/pump

nauticalmiles

lb

slug - ftk

sec Z"

Page 134: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 135: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

RPM (I)

RPM2

RQ

RTIP

RX

SFC

SHI

SHNG

SHP (I)

SSS1.2

TI

VAF

vo(i)

VJ

VJVO(I)

VTIP(I)

WIDTH

WT(K)

WTWIN

WTOT

WTRAT

HP - hr

HP

- Pump RPM RPM

- Pump RPM at hump speed RPM(subroutine SESIN)

- Reduction gear Q-factor

- Pump inlet tip radius ft

- Ratio of pump RPM atcruise speed to RPM athump speed

- Specific fuel consumption

- Pump head coefficient

- Shaft horsepower requiredafter fuel is removed

- Shaft horsepower HP

- Suction specific speedcruise speed and hump speed

- Time interval for fuel hrconsumption calculation

- Variable area factor(ratio of inlet area at humpspeed to inlet area at cruisespeed

)

- Ship velocity input and KTSsubroutine SESIN remainder ft/secof program

- Jet velocity ft/sec

- Jet velocity ratio

- Pump blade tip velocity ft/sec

- Width of^inlet opening ft

- Weight of fuel required lbfor one time period

- Minimum weight ratio

- Total system weight lb

- V/eight ratio

- 67 -

Page 136: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 137: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

WVJ

XDRAG

XKEEP

XK

XN

XNGT

XWD

XWENG

XWF

XWGR

XWIN

XWPIP

xww

XX(J,K)

- Jet velocity ratio for lbminimum weight ratio

- Inlet system drag

- Minimum weight ratio(subroutine pump)

- Reduction gear K - factor

- Factor for SFC versuspower curve

- Number of gas turbines

- Pump dry weights lb

- Weight of engines lb

- Total fuel weight lb

- Reduction gear weight lb

- Inlet system v/eight lb

- Transition pipe weight lb(user may add additionalweights)

- Pump water weight lb

- Main program outputswhere

1 - Jet velocity ratio

2 - Weight ratio

3 - Overall propulsive coefficient

k - False propulsive coefficient

5 - Shaft horsepower at hump HPspeed

6 - Shaft horsepower at cruise HPspeed

7 - Suction specific speed athump speed

8 - Pump RPM at hump speed rpm

- 68 -

Page 138: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 139: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

9 - Number of pump stages

XLP - Pump length coefficient

*Note A. As used above . ( I ) indicates ship's speed.

1=1- Cruise speed= 2 - Hump speed

- 69 -

Page 140: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 141: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

" X)X

LO»-* <I

O t—<3. <.a:

O 1/1

aUJ ^

UJ LO XIO O2 X CL< JEoc -^ —» (NJ (/) p.

Q. —

1

LU —

1

CO LJ >0 •

2; '—

'

> ONLU Q • z LL1— |— «- —

»

a p.

CO l/l M (NJ i— >> <a (N) w-LO _j

rsj OLJ

^(_3

21— e; -^ <i Ct. H <JJ 1— O a: CJ • •~3 LO a: •k 1^- •*

oc «£ CL »- «~i LL XLU •» •* «^ t—

1

*• r-H

t— iC —

.

—j — •> (Nl

< O 1— LP *—• en »».

3 O2 LT\

> <•

(.O

t— p-i —

^

X r\j •* O oc — Ct' f- ljLU •• Z UJ *- ^ *-* r—

J

l~ <r —4 Q O <«—J I_l •—

X t— t\l -^ X II O ~ *-* U- ^ V. LU£. <a a •» < — fNI x. h—

«

^r • — LD ilC ^^ (JO

»

JJ *-* Of ^2 »- » » •> 3; (NJ <I LO • >v(NJ CC •» (NJ 1— <I a. *-* «-% a: UJ *^ QC *—

*

w LO 1—

X -J •—I X> —

»

< it r\j Of X <\j -3 <i X LJ LJ p. 1

LUl/> LL p> LJ LJ» Pi X ex. l_l i/i —

'

* —

1

•• -> m- ^c .—

1

LJ LUJ UL 1— p P «— *• U •> •

--C >—

1

p CL pi LL _) • ^c: U-_J *£ rsj a. (Nl .£. O UJ i— *-^ ^- <c LU — U) DC vO i(C

U_ (NJ —

1

«a _u 1—

<

I_l •> L^,' <i CJ LL. O J_ —

'

t—

t

LL. LJLO a 1— X p. X «—

4

2! u. CC ii •« w Q 1/1 •- » HQ. i/7 a. LU •» in or LI_ < LU » LU LU LU U —

*

m ••

•—* lO >—

«

p 35 —

»

•> 1-} c: — CL •—1 X > —

.

X .—

1

-0X p. —

-

_U LL LU O •h • (NJ — O h- \— • UJlO —

<

QC < X Of p •- a. Q. ^ *-h <—* —

*

*» ^> m <z in 1—4

LJ < 1— •» LU 1— LJ LO Z3 < ro •—) (NJ ~> •~) p. LL • 1—H- .2: —

LU «a O. ll <; •—1 CL cn O —

.

O ~> -^ O <— m X 00 p O 1—

t

O D- >v -v X "X. >» LJ L_- < <; rJ ri O O (NJ a r—

1

^ /—

^

r\ » O- O-U >^ X. V ^ ^2, r— ^v *»» ^ i— ,_( • —

t

—* • •—

1

t— (NJ <£ (NJ P- Ou. I— LU ^ Q LL. LO -3 O. ^-* LU fM K •- •-• •> '3 •- O *£ p. x> LL (NJ (Nl _lLL _J ' QC »-~ <•-! OC ^ ;. *-H 2. •«» L-J r~* (_J u \ LJ ^-4 r "\ —

1

*—

t

-^ LJ n 1^ U" <£ LULU L_l .£ <3 Jt —J '_) i_l _) "T U ! .2 •» «3 LL <a — «\l LL •a LL IT X LL LL u> u> —

1

^>U- •—

_L O _j^ a. '_) C^. ^: _5. LJ a\ —4 '-U u i LU UJ r>i UJ >5* LU O CL «—

*

cj l/l —

'

^T LJ' LO-U >s ^* •>v V v. »* ~x *>« >>. —

^

00 11 II CC ^^ 3 a. *-* U. ^* ac *-* M *^ m LU —

I

>T O 1

• « LU 1—

u <z si 2 <c -y 2 z 2 ? •-0 11 h— -

)

1—

«

— -;' ^-. t— —< (— •— 1— ta> t

p- UJ O _

1

• ^-( .—

1

D LO QC< U' a i_J LJ r

. J i_i . j• J a 2 t_) ^: *-- < •—4 "— <^ — <r ^ «C .u <1 ,-1 a. II • (f 1 • II O UJ

u. •?- :l J> i. :" 2» i rs_•~

:•. _j - *—

<NJ Cl 7. V- c_ ^, C_l >. (_i a. t— 5 • Ul Ul P ) CI (NJ jfi a^ _l J>

a -•- Z if. 2. 77 ''x. ;C -•- i_

*-"" LU c.- < IX. »_* < cc •i CL »t cr. >-< -X. O LO II II m u II _J .

*

-D L-J •_> LJ i_j 1 i_j a i_i C »—

1

?v u. '.J LU a LJ LU 1 1 LU LJ LU LJ or U LL Q. •—

<

1—

t

<I 11 X it <l LJLO LJ (_) <_) c_j O U O '_) »* (J 't LL

« J

INJ

at LL.

i—

1

O

oc LL,

(NJ

O

QC LL

(J

.c LL

1 >

'

rNI

LJ Q. JL QC X LJ O

- 70 -

Page 142: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 143: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

*- •

»

« LU»—

i

-—

»

^^ i—

i

o —#> u *—>

*—

-

J> t

v -J co— J> *vLU —

'

»

X ^ ^-i

l~ 1~» •—

o c ~ ^3 LU ~ — >—rt

O j_ —J —

»

oU —

>

« *-* oor. >*- o .—

i

1

a. o J> «"

'

3

•JC-

.—

1

;>

>

O>

ivj

l_l

-Uj_1—

o<

—4II

o>—>

z>

o«£

a._>COI/'

«c

UJ

co•

n

ooLU

'_)

o—I

LULULU

a.

X.

a.

L-l

•a.

UJ>*•

r\j

^>

UJ

1

•a-

+

.—

i

<;CJ

i—LU5f

UJ-»

M1

1—LJ<3.

LU

UJ<ILU

•B-

CM

»—

1

a-»-

^,

UJ1

_JLJ

I

UJ>

UJJ»

"V.

UJ-p

1c1.J

J.

H.

'.5

CM*•

i

<I

<3

UJ

o

o1

1—

1

uJ>—>

>*•

CM

V.

.—

(

UD1ccc

.—

1

•—

«

»T

CJ1—

o

oin

>v

1—

oX

*

1—

o

ii

LU

«—

i

uy

UJ

LU

LJ

_lLUQ•

O

CM

Ccr "J* ft" at <1 <X (M 1— u *— •— + UJ —

1

ai *—

<

1—cc • • 1-4 J_l UJ V. Ol > LU —H ac o LU

Io cm CM 3 O <_> — 'M -5 ^ q ^» _4 Q. o cr o• * # r> •» 1

-J LO > o 1— w K- in a. r~t U3.-* -^ •» •J_ LU ~* p—

t

«— •4- —* _3 uy J «-« •> 3 W*c 2 "? Q£ _J <i ^: z 1— > UJ -« * > ^ h- "Z. o —MM UJ UJ •^ 1— •—

«

•—

UJ r<> •j m*0 >- o Z - > m<\J M j_ J_ I— 'NJ IU CO uj <^ r*— _J • t— *^ ^; •—< •ta o LJ ~3 ro•» *-*

I 1 (? O II UJ u 1 LU • O h- *^ f—

1

LU !\l rv X • • CJ -> U. •

-^ • t UJ ^u -_J 4i <Z. *^II

-*II

t

1 UJ r_i ^^ 1—4 * CJ LLI Q. <jy o u a CM II LU 2. I— C«~!

II .> _1 j. J_ ~4 "" ~ _> •~ II -~ • -J o 4J» i— <r _J •— —

«

II II ~- O -^ 3 _J f—

4

CJ ^T1-4 II «< w w 1— U.' *-^ —

4

UJ ,-4 -^ -^ ^^ i— LL <I PH U3 ^ ~— h- X X II • ^ 2 a_ + •

-* •—4li II

)

Y -*1 --*II w ^» —

1

^« 'j r^j II y ^-* -^ f _ i*—

UJ <j <l < <£ D .^ »—

»

~5 —

>

om — H- •—

4

(V a. h- UJ Z 1— r3 —4 «» *£ ii H- _ ' II i— 1— k— s UJ >. a. «—

4

II i -) ^_ _i •—

<

—i •—

«— •?: _TC ex z: < —• UJ ^ —• u > ~» 1— '5 — X t— <£ >— Ci o II CM •—

'

> _l > ^: _j II—

o UJ i_j 3 UJ i_i LU — UJ •a. ~5 'O en -J u. O ^r u_ LU UJ UJ UJ ~£ _> II —> LJ tj I LU —) LI <a. -3 LU UJ

CJ J> o UJ o u '_> LU o iu J> J> G. ^> ^o

a. ^ o UJ LL —

4

UJ

— a. a. i. CJ .> UJ

OL"\

UJ UJ

ino o

- 71 -

Page 144: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 145: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

oinin*

Q.J_00* ^J

— r- S\Vi> u

»

«£ aX l_! >—^-» t—•«v o

GO -^ O or- o

t—a O *-» <ah— > o

211—

i_> — -—

'

_S

o —j • •

•** .u 1—— '-J o _J'_> <l • •

• UJ C£ 1

^CJ ID i_) «rr —

«

UJ y II ^ S.• — •—

j

*— i—— t— I_J i »

CJ

o

u

a.

*CO

CM p'

i— — L5 *-« *- e: O< —

i

• o <_

)

• .d

-c — X .X > X ct- ,J iu < a T ill <l LL

^ -> 3 ->- II -> — ._ il

II — <£ —

-

X II 3 f\J x.< > — ^ < —> —

'_; <:

— II — J_ i -> t— Q. >.£T^> 1 —

i

Z — r\|

i— ^>^j i. o u ;j a. uj-iU — aao — "-

inIS)

in

-j _l <J — _i *o UJ

O CM o ^-^

l_l -•> (— • 00 + —t—

r-t 3 _^ ^^, ^. <M2

W—i

1

t_) %^» O "-* 1

r-^ CM i—

i

-*1- h- -— —1—

1

o CJ l_) •< t—t l_) -~ ~- CNJ r^ il l_) •>.

^ > —

.

> c o ^ a. c 00 zz CD > —

.

LJ — -J U —) h— a: zx. j_ j_ l/l a. _l ~3 ^-4

Z> t.J J> CM > ^ CL U- \ji oo 00 ex u. > -—~5 UJ -r UJ • II t_> •

II II II II ii II II II II II '_> LU CJT

.> -\ ~ »— —

»

uT\ — --» --- —* -^ -~» — *^ —

*

*^ ^n _3 II

II V 2 o ~-4 w —4 f^ rn J- -i o h- 00 ^ r—

1

>* 1—~3 —

o •— • — UJ —

1

«— O >— UJ> 1— i— I— 1—

1 J 1

• »-« 1—

1

•—

1

»—

*— n-« •—

i

i—

t

»-* —4 l_J — 1— _li^ S- .^ •— > J> ^: iTO l_) j J U- ~5 l_l II u_ X X X X >^ X X ^L X "J i_) LJ —'L

mm

o

in

-> u X X ^ X. ^. X ff. ^v X -> ^j l_)

o<

- 72 -

Page 146: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 147: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

1

or-i if- • -5.

> ^ —J

X X »< X •ii- u Ot J» I— 4> r- —

*

XLU •» .—

i

<. ~ 4» -J tnIX • T" X tx 4— II 14 _1 h< il 1—

o m-3.

X<l

4-

X JU>

Xz. X •

'r— it —

I

II O " ^U ~5 1—4 LU X r^-

(— LU a- 3 * »- • > to 4—4 ^> Li

<. _l * K Z •o o _l o a «•>

a: ^K. 1—

IJJ

<- a.—

i

4)

o XX 73X

*^- 1—

1

X1—r

t5 — r X H X -> .—

1

•. X X X 4k •-

•- • .**. ^ * X > X » — ar X X X r—

1

X X it- i—

i

« 3 -5 4kII

4>- X X X m 4)

<T o • •K- o •> m f— sC X X <XI •k—

> —

1

UJ •- X ^ II 2 • ZD 4» -s. X•- »- t^ X Q :X i—i — X o *£ 4> 444 Ik

cc •T i—

i

lh 1—4 • s: ^f -^ .—

1

X LL. —

»

Xo • 3 ^^ 1— r- t— LU o X kj- o s a^

•* O ex sT <. X ~z t—

*

4—4 •> LU •l » "kk. •*

X .—

i

<_> • OL o 4H o X » > M 4> - <-

t— X 1 O .—

1

~7 1

t X n —4 a. H- X to •

x •* 1— ~

i

z •• > X LU a LO s .ix" r^ X o1—4 » X X o vT t\J X a 4—4 X X UJ •- X Xi II o •• t—

<

• X LU X h- X X •r—

1

444 <1 -— •4

* * —

i

• 1/1 o X L) < Q- o SI t— 1—

t

XCM 55" X II 3 t-4 •> X X X CJ 1—

1

X LO »• -X)

z >(• X -& X X X > X LL. ex .—

1

-1—4 * *c LL. *- •c X 4—4 h- X X 444 II kf

X % H- >'.i—

i

- i. > LO X X 4k X 44

•> '* LU i o II t\j 1—

*

X X 2 u X •. kO^r * X »r « X LO :d *—4 a o LO X —

*

X>—

i

» z * X -J^ X X X X i—

<

«• 44> X C7^ 44k

X M- •—

1

> LU * * X a ^ i— X ». - X 44. X•-

-t<- » IC _l -,;-—> a. X X X X o -L 1 r-

rvl * ••33 2T ^;- > O X _J (J r) »^» 1—

t

• II 4>

.

Z X ;^- .—

(

^,- .—

i

X <1 1—

1

LO •• X 4»- iii sT• ,—

,

IU LO -R- » .«c X CL >— X 44> 1—

1

X •* •

t\J <I CO •V K- •- ft X X ~J Ji o X r~ —

.

vC

* 4> »—

4

•J- X ik X LO — 4—1 X 44k Kf u.i— t— 3 • a. o 3f; X X X »— Q- 4» k ».

OJ X a. o 2. .—

I

l_l *-- •M. <^ <l X IX <I LO \-J _l X. —-J _l X ~H X 4» t— "^» S rt. LL "~; >- LU X 444 LU vl 1

.<-. 1 X T vj" O •v r-t X X 1— jZ. 444 •« -aJ X. •- Ni—i in k—

'

<i v>1

• «3 N. X -> 5 4—4 —

1

4>> X X X. -r -^

•c p- <r LU •. 1- o X >r X C 3 V o X X kO lO — • i—

i

* .—

»

IX II X .—

1

• TiL < 1 X LU -OJ 4k *» <— o •

CD O •X -~ <X Jf J> X <3 o —

»

?" 4-4 y 4*44 X LO — •> » «> — U. ro• 1— <3 o )r 1—4 •» X •—

i

o _5 X • o X X .3 444 X X X •• LL

tf •N. o t— » X m CZL u. o z < ik o > o 4—4 17J CO in o X -• — O 1— x —

i

LU 4-~^~

II <<. •k f\J 4—1 <;_ X m T" r"» 4—t 4—4 ro kc" vl- >^

C\J f\. o X LU ^ X c >} — kj- X. •» r>- kj* *kj* 1— ~ •k k3" »— in-X — X X •» <£. J ' i— ^t -U II

k <^ •4. »—

4

4>k 4k <J a » tk. 3h— \— 'J — z Z. y <-- 1— >—•

r' X 4f X n- 1— ^3 X \ X •k X OS o -^ h- rxi —*

t^\ LU > ^\J 4—4 -— —

4—4 ^ m X * .3 ¥r 7Z. 4» -o ^r ^ 4> *£ V 444 2 •

Z. _l k— • d X •3. X -^ • M <£. «- <i •ft 1—4 4k N • 4—4 4-H ir 1—1 44* 4k X 4—4 -uX. .«£ *» O *M* •J- Jl- R- y. X T- —

fi- l—

H

-'- rc X r _) QL X LU X X. X LO rr. "K X» •—• 44»» Li- LU t— ex kL/ kj" LU LL LL Ql. n "- • IV X >* c in • —• LL. —4 *s: u_ <r CT" _j CL x -a. <3 <\| • ,

-k^ < r- r- X < <l <—

,

— •• tj. •z 1* 4—4 —» D Ll_ —

w» u 4—4 — tk> < 1—1 — Xz> ^ — ST -TV «^ 2 II 21 > > w >— * X "- > <- *— t— i—4 •• —

X X ^^ t— 444 i. — i— -r

a 1—

J

C < • t-» -Ti X U at l_) «— II II Lx <l I-

- r-i * • -' LU <r X - IU «I LU LU -tr U- »-. a *C 4>

< <I ii — r\i r— II 1— »— c_) I— — i\J rv f— Zi —-t u •• * 1— ;. 4k II — X 5*. lO t— j 5 444 i— >- —*ii II U. — 'l X 2 LJ il x Z. z. •—

4

X a •>• ,<• X 4— _i m ^J C 4-H a. X k—

4

tx '. 44k 4—1 tx •

x IX <t u. 1 X »-* 4—4 X X X X 4—4 *— £ LJ ^u -T •» in l_l u. CD II J> • OL u X cn ,3 X X -1". X (*•

< (_> j> •—t <a X X -S Xin

X i J <l X Xo

_">

U1£ IL.

oorsj

•r

X ~7 OCM Pi

i XSJkJp".

•kt

X4—4

j: XomkT

—4kL> 3 X X

o-Jkfkt

- 73 -

Page 148: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 149: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

o

Q. — 'JJ

•— ~— _J— t— i^IU « IM|

1— i h— a.•—i or. ^r i_i oU. l_> i_j ^ «£

I U. 'j 1/5 LU

o aj

o r-m>T

- ?4 -

Page 150: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 151: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

a.to<

Oin UJ• u.

CM 00<

a.- a u>

i/3 u_ •

<l CM_l J-

•- u CC inO z. in o r-H- LU cm u_ CO(/) 1—

t

o —4si o cp H- •—

1

a. — LT\ 2: vO^: u_ • UJo u_ + ft-^4 +Z UJ «-» o *-*

LU CM ^-» ^-» »—

I

-^ CM—

1

•—

_J —

»

u_ U_i LL u_ *-"

H •• <J + * LL + ai—

«

l_) z > UJ • UJ LU O >' o <J at -it- •* o CM o o # * ••>

o uu UJ o • 4-1 + u a —

inm> cc •*

1

m CM — u_ ~^ (M —

<

CO_J <—• CM z o 1

^-" + <—

i

O 1•-» o

l_> •» ^* *—

4

(_> l_) ^-* I_3 —

*

<i L-J l_l o•- I— LJ «« l_> in in -

i_i atl ^»- -> •

r\j 21 J> _l ^J 1 -H- -> •3" <_> "3 # ^> i_l * * 1

<l N^ -J -J m —

*

• * cj «j O « • CJ -

t— a: J> <t CM r) CL o • O ca — O + CMLU Q. •> C£ o -— CJ •* • ->r it o + UJ o —» —

-

•• •—

<

>» UJ »— a 00 o -^ * «-• -~ <r> a — _i -J" CO Q r-^ a-^ t» CM > > • "v. * .—

'

*

• • • v. ;V -—

i

^ CJ • ^v •« «M« ><i < Ct •_• o O * C> • • ^ m •jn Q • • •-» —i c_3 CJ • • o *•— I— <1 r-i C3 —

»

O o a '/> •—

<

i

"3 13 42»—

i

• CJ o •o > ~^1/3 OJ •—

t

Z> u_ ^ LL, <r + > r—

1

1 1 CC' •T + >• LL + u> >T * •il- CMUJ -V ^ •v* LJ ^ -

^ ~< u- „ 1^ *-» ^w »—

4

Uu i- _) *— ~v f—

<

LU -^ «*

co 2 X o i/> cm o -»1

%; -» —

.

CM CM -»| •f -~ <r> r\j ~

1/* —1 a

-U C? 2" Z i— • > J-J • • j CM «— »^ UJ • • —* ?" i—

uu • • —

j>UJ Q£ uJ _i •-* LJ UJ _» H- * 3 j> *-* ^~

1-J l_J « D ul —* U LU LJ ir o iJT> a *^ «a ^L ib < >— —> UJ n • CM —j _i l_l ^ > • CM ^M i i —

i

1

J» m CM —

i

> \s\

— O. i—

.> <J t— £L • —J CM >* 1j» J» «wtf —

-

CM S 1j> i— ^C ->\- ISI "V 1 -,i- o UJ CM

h- \ >v V» < t—

1

-x. o 1*m* •j_ » f~- ^-»

1 I 1—

*

u. j' < 1—

I

o 1»-• LL •j a _^ .%,

3 JT 7" %"" Z _, <3 M <r -) U_ u. t <r -!i 1 r. ,^ U_ u_ <^ _i L.J CM U_ U. ~^ ii >o ^y -r~)

O O ' J D l_> io o •— o UJ -)1

•ii S- <) -***

-f •1

• ii~ u •—

1

r -> Lt> *1

• ^j II at •— OQC :- i. jr a o — «— vj u\ • Q O ** m r*- r*- ^-. c_, jj O CM i_J _ —

O -> (J UJ '_) z *i _3 *— J' :• -l ^•_ i _ — • m D «« «w> •—-* <i II • • • «—

'

—* ^-* <; _J 1— • • m «« **** ^4 »—

4

1—4 1— z •

_J i_j l_l Q _) <j <1 J_ II II II II II II — _J II II li II II ii h- •a. <a ii II II II II II (-3 j£ UJ LJ II

t/i o O l_> o (_> UL UJ <I Xi o j_ i_; CZ. a. UJ <1 CO i_; UJ —

'

JL LL J_' l_3 <a OJ O O CJ Cr l_J

o

(_) UJ o U

- 75 -

Page 152: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 153: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

COin

Oc\j

C\J

t\l

>

fvl

LU*-

CM o1 +u_ —+ ^-i

U —

C3on

• \o •

CJ sT

U1

I

CM

Oo.>-A

*

-J

c_> .n

CNI

I

l_l

oI

Li.

I

CJ

cII

:mcm

-O C) — —tM

CMI

•K-

Oo

' 3

oCO -T +

(_l

+

II II II

X

C —I

-=• -"> UJ • • —lH • f\j —' ->vcj r\j -». | * i

—O I

-% Li. < • »r~? ' > XN U_ u. * II >I t ?CI O —' +

|

•—'IIO'.TC—

• cj «\i CJ uj o «£ Z •_-• . • — — -i - - n k c

ii ii ii ii ii n tj j: j 'Jj ^U-OU_ <J.Tl_Jl_)(_l'—( T£ uJ

- 76 -

Page 154: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 155: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

CNJ

I/O

<

.-

o

CM

Q.U.

-L.

cm

;>ooX

<;or

a.

!\i

0.

CM

<r

u

O

rvj CM CM— r^ r-.

LJ • •

a O o•

1 I

fM lo .J

U—

4

LLLLLU

a

<Ia;aQ<L

>-

LJ

«• z — LIJ ^t » kW • •

(_. •— CM X •M« h- ^ O »—

«

k—

1

<3 O —

-

— u. <r 1—

t

1«k u.

UJ O f •"! h— *"» <1 a; Q •» CM LL.

CM sc •- •~ <^ u. CM 1— H- O fM •J- -U2. •—

_J CM CM Qd —

)

«—

'

Li_' IS ^: »- -T •

U. •"• V_> •—

»

IX l_) •CI »_fl •" *> j«; *-* CI _jQC »— •> _) LJ CM rn •* <.•» «£ cv -> LJ LU <1 LL c\, C^J j. —

•> O >>*

CNJ •—

<. ~5 *> C> ^ -U w »—

1

i_i <I ": • 0^ i—

CO Q_ v— > .—

1

r LU X ^C •» T 3 • •—4 LU X1/1 a. LU •» Oi <I 2T »• o_ Lfi ^1 < sT I1- 1—i/> >—

<

•» "•^ O at: LU *j a *-• •» h- •k 1*- Z k—

«

•—

1

CM•» •» »—

l

CM O •> •> UJ *T> J- 'O j_- Is-. • »—

i

UJ m QC—

i

QC < — •> 0. LL. X *» ac *k • • —* X u Oa. U <; 1— Q (_> '/-> O » H-4 1 1

k—

.

*

1—

*

1 _l Oz: 3: •—

UJ > <l •—

i

'_> <; >— ^. CL r\j 1*7k _l LL.

l 1

_) a. ^ ~V V. (_> 2 LJ _i_ Jl "s. "V *-- •k _> <t O »—4 <\J

a *•. X <2 O •V ^ -*» \ ^V _J — c? 3 • s_ <. <\- JJ —

4

!_} < u. LL. Q 0- 'O r > • •—

'

O 'J LU (/I t— —UJ ~D : j t _J > «-

-U <; -^_ ^C ^: rn 1• • > — LU LU

«£ t_i <i <T LU _> X U Jj _) aj i_i s 1 >^ J O r-

l_) II II

»—

a. •-< IX > LI. vi <_> X iX J. l_5 'J ^ < II II

i— >v N. -^ V. >*. v» ^. ^» — >». ^ <—

<

LJ LJ *"»» —

*

\— l_ —-* ."SJ

3 3 -- .L" Z 2 *T Z -3" '.• Z <£ /^ a. c •—4 CM >_• LL. w —a t_l l_) U J 1 J 1

• '-) J 5 1 .1 ' 1"* •"-* —

*

LL aj <T «fT

cc i. i. > -1 a. 2. 2. <_ T~ 2- -^ *„ <i < Q. C K.(~"i ~>

cc a. -kt s: -•- >_ .4. -2. i- £ > SL £. 1— t— <I <i ."j^ 01 «-i«-"•

_j *_. l_l •_. O "3 <_3 '-J 'J J (_> 1—4 -4 <l 1— ^» a LJ r— 1—1/5 O J t_> O •_j LJ U O LJ Q L2 LU UJ u. LU LU

LJM-

z>

CM

LL.

'^J

XLT1

U.1

<_>

O 1

-** —

»

c —<«k^

< >111 ->

X >Q

-S.

O

OLU

LJ

a-

>

<i*

o

-i -^ — — D —

1

— — <I ^. 3 —l_) O 'J — JJ LUu u <: .i i ifl

o

LJ<rLJ+I—LJ

»

— •I

tMO O -T LJ —> -> S <1 O•ft «• •-• LL. >J5 —

-

CM ~- li-

O —' —1

X ~- ^ rt (M

5. c_! iy> -r?

T O + >> ^ h- -3

•»UO>s m < ,;- U L K

II

LJ X

'-J U Oj J—

f\i 11 o i— at:

~» — < 11 j u^r <i 1— a. a.— >— kj_ L_' i. LJLJ Q <£ O _) ^LJ (J L^ LJ i_) <^

I - in -> t j 11

'JO • CM <T '-> —

II II II — II *~ I— I— -~ 3 csj

H U O > IvIU— —> <L -J — II LJJ < u. > UU G

C_J

o o LJ O

- 77 -

Page 156: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 157: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

o

>

LJ >> •

4f r\j

< ot— >IX.' -*

«• —<_> —

1

^o

>— #O —

.> —

«

-J WiJ» <* L_l—

i

«3.

i—

i

t-« LUO *> O—) *^> --

_> LUM X

+LU cI XI

I Xa. 1

LU <l

~ >D. \S,

X X.

II II

>— — I—*1 [SI <3

l_j < Li

U J u

(M

l\J Q.— a •

Q X Ot_» ^ -j

^ ™ ivi

a i —

.

.

ii

• — a. cm'j i_* a «~ii j I a—

. n n —X X X >—

u. u i -»

n iLL Ua- lu

Jt LA,

X —

<a:

#

o

-ft- LT\

•—4 —

r*i

X —

i

• -»a. a. * *->

* # * CM.— • —

*

wcm c\i <v Q.—'•«— •—

U. U. ,> —I lj>—I •— LO in ir\

I— I— X #^ a \ u u* -» >n h- I— <Mt-i "X « ««»

a. • * n c < a«» o * (J i! ^ —

v^ ^jj ->|

f\l — ~- O • CM—» cm U • J'. •—

O - Lf I- 1.1 U.oa >«• -j r— —

i

*— •— — • •i

I- I- M .T I- P LJLL' LT. .> Ll_ I II ) tU -< jj

U D u H J .i_ •»<T3 ii j\\ zc ist — a. >- ./> m 2: c y.I— — II IN) JC LO /) ~~ L) — L! ' —

'

2 i— a. — n — i/-, a. i— i— hi >—

12 *; •— z «/i — ^ y~ 2O LJ t— Q. y"i X LL I— L_/ LJ OO l_>-UQCai/i"«-»ou-o

II

CD

IS)

PI

II

OI— Olo r-

r

oLU

^j r- ^

OI

• J'_> J

in

COI

o —

a.

xX

ccLJ

I

<tLJ

•it

xQ«Xo

CM o -JLTI IA

X II

(•> U— I—u_ l/J

i

*C

^Mits

—> CMINJ

I

LJ

o

-it-

er«•

«^ _. ^, mo — \— ~U. LJ\ a

I— LJ^. «-<

LJ II

IL.O «i — Z

LJ ~-Q- L_~

CII II

•JJ -Jj

X. —3 I

lO OI

X —

>

(J JJ II

« _) —<r -^ <\i

lj — —I

*- lx

ii •< <A J I-

cr U iu

in

- 78 -

Page 158: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 159: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

l_> — z<rj — •—

I

O (X Ui — U— i_j acm > <_>— St <a

z —

.

lj— cm|O — «

u a "-<

4- > i

• _. *-^

rvi \ r\|

>v O —lj * o<. — >lj uj ~5

-* X >CM O- >t-w LU •

2 X «M

a v. "vo • —• + —

Ir\j <i

CM <I LJ

a < —

> •— <\j

—> LU —>

JL^

>s cm ulj

im q *w ;> LJa. —

)

<c<a > ljh- *a. ~ OCO — <_>

• > ~ff -5 rvi

CO > —u^ — LJ• -v >* — *J• —. rv

f\J (\J ~-

II — o— o <CM > Of.— »[_o • —ac rvj llq. •" —

._>

LLJr

<M

a •

* I

O r\j

hi —

»

L'l LL• »—

UJ >—

_J -»• II

— r\j

en

cm

LJQ.4-

XO-K-

(vl

r- im lj— uu u •

t— CX. II

4- XD -NJ <.

O * h-£ UJ

—» X-H O ~—4 X •

• —. Oh- —I •

LU » XJ• r\j —

(

LJ uu I

C D ? ^, /,

Z J Q. «t

O •— LJ II I—»— y- — x lj

.c: — -a —uuu.hu.Li) (_> •— LU ~i

CM

a.

u

«— »— cnj

z > z\*—< ^t- •—

I

Q — CtU -<L)4- —

|

• U _)CM > LJ>v —

|

X oi ;>Q- —j oouj > p-

X —G

I

O — »- UI

cm— K- — LJ—J • ^ L3— r\j —

4- —« —o ore: in

—< I— — LJ

<1— X2: *

it

cl>

< zI— LJUJ (_J

LJ — •

+ u —

i

— cf |

^4 C— >' CM

> ^ Q-

— Z. t-—i lj ;>~— —• II O LUJ — nT -><t-jf\i ^c_- u. a - •—

— <( •— £.u. UJ H U 1J— 2 J>UU

oL3

1X1

<ILJ

OOCO<I

cLJ

CO

<ILJo_

XX

CQLJ

I

<LJn-<j.

LJ

-^ -"« Xciroo•. r> %

-J --< X^- — C_J

< <I —LJ LJ r—rx o. cr\\UISJ —j 4-

- •• X

CMin

Ooo

^JLJ

^H —* L^ U ^

<t << <:

O LJ LJ On. cx

|i—

ii ii ii

<1 oj x i_i

u u a o

CMI

CO-a

lJcj

CO

CM

<oo_4-

X

CM

CM

*i aLJ oex •

4- II Xcm x <rir <i. ^—-K- — UJx 'jj ->•;-

O -~* "• r\j

-i j a• <3

<M UJ —<3 • II C— LLl_< X —» P*- _•

2- < -< Z. —|| I

. LJ — —

I

x u rx--1 — <: Z 7Tt- x i- u u alu — jj ej lj -x

O LJvO c<•^

OC. LJ* Li)t—

o_ —

.

o* • •• t_J —

<

X CM *D 1

or # CM *"•

*• *-• • CM— ^-* UJ ^rsj —" _) a.--^ <fe_ • »—

*

2l rx *~ t—Q. ur •—

^JX H »-< ii

II—

^

cx —— ~-j •—

«

CM

>— — a > a

ini

ro r—UJ

- 79 -

Page 160: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 161: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

* H- 1—* V LO#

JJ/

i—

i

UJ TT UJi/> •» * or»—

»

X >^-

~ _j in _i"V CL ^ Q. <x^ LJ <^j S. h-^

1• 1J O

V* > o T" h—V. -^ ^- —j

1•

.

CM • *—

i

IX <: •CO «

X ^ j •- o X• CJ o o m _l o

LT> Cj> -_J _J II X r-4

1

•» a LU •if ^

/

CO

>—

o00

o

<5

1

O•

.—

i

•—

l

a.

UJ•»

CM

CL<l\—UJ

i—

i

LJJ*^>->•

(M—i

O

LL

C*l

••

II

o>—>

—<T

z.oi—

<

—_jo>•»

o

00i—

*

UJ

CM

oa-K-

*—

i

a.»—

i

(—^>

-^

XCl*-

CM

»

CM

^r

•—

<

OX

L3

o:LJX

r—

t

Cjf

cz••

Ol.

<

»

•—

1

Q-

i-

LL

oo

^—

i

LL•-

II

>i

LULO

_0

o1

h-

LU

LJ

L_LLLUOo

H-

Xin

<r•

o,—

I

LL

II

x.

ir

Q-

Xt

1—

#

CL

T

LJLJXUJ-i»

Cl—

«

1—

Xo

Cl

_JCl

X_).—

1

**

CM•

-—

*

LL

ii

J*-

"H"

TT«•

*li-

ft-

LU

i—LOt—

(/I

LUCL

LJ<tCCL-l

X

t—1

r—

1

.—

1

o1—

1

X

II

JS-

**-X

*5)-

LULO

ui

LJ1

«aoroi—

•>»

r—

4

CJ

X

II

•a-

#o OTCM (VI

CM 3dLlj

Q. rv .—

1

oIJJ

CM =)

CM•

LU_l

*» 3. «— — t*. J_ 1— •-* ^-< • _l LJ • UL O • <r •if

:<"* • CL a. t— — > ^-i ^" i— LL >-< O (_) i—

i

i— k>H

- • 1— t- —

i

•— .<£ » «•» •a- — — L3 7? •• IL .—

<

1 LL -^ • LJj. «j _J <a. 1

h- •— a» «^H -^ (M ^ 3. >—

» LL X ^; • •—

»• l/>

Ly LU • UL *» j> or X LJ «^ —

i

*-^ •—

«

t <y X X' •. LJ • 3£ X -—

l

O uj —• • LL h- II 'j UJ ii o UJ u» a. lt\ • UJ u/> LJ — 2. U LJ Q. m LJ — _J II X LO _J-j- -> UJ t— xj j£ -» >r _) <» *r _" u* — «-" ~^ 33 vi ~t ij u. o II •— ~- <_> ii LL •x-

i— —* X^r ? <s> UJ II cm rv^ .2 m (XI £?L w 1— II Z 2 ' 'i u.

• » f*SII

1— ««« »— >.«J.

**~ h- o Z.U —- <s vr X H ^ CJ ^* ii »" t_J •—

U uj <3 1— X *-« n II ii II LT CO LU <3 7T 4f, X ;c LU <i1

or

i— i— _J _J x 'JJ I— a. h- H— t— c — H- 1— i— is. <. _> I— CM "-H .—

i

(M <J -^ t— ^_ i i V? » ^ t— 5^_ X' 3<c -J — _» UJ LO •— ^ lo >—

1

^: — _i_ it t— «£ lo l_) — -' 01 I/) •—

i

X -J + 3 J/ "- or o (—LJ LJ <a u_ j_ 3d •q. i— t_i u <L 1

(_i o LJ or l_l — LU UJ fj 3t X _ LJ X Cl U LL •>« LL *• U- i-J z UJLJ o o ^ *^ X _) _» vy u —l -> o o (J _s U. .s. 31 o V) a. Ll_ Q. X. or 3 LL

_. CM ro

"^ X•—X

LJ <_> m o CM lp o •—

<

m 00 00 c-

CM

u •-*

m

- 80 -

Page 162: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 163: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

cr.

CO<

oco

o

o•a

MJ (-Ct -» UJ•-« <\l -5

•- ~— «4.KU »«i > <\

—> >—

J> LU

h— » CM •>

X cr- -» ll

C •= ~ '_)

—i — > o

c\j

ClQ.

X

coX

ac.

CL

t— m<I — oQt t— .—

1

POQ O f\! »-

•» «=rr — O.—

,

X co •--- LU <\J •> •—* r—CM X w t— •—

*

a 4"— •k CL <L rsj •- mJ —

»

< •cc ~- —

>

•«tf CNJ 1— t— CL -h mCt •— LU _s ^ J. r\j <_>

!_' u « •b .x. VI»—

C\J

LU u. r\i (\J JS. r— «r. •»

o LU — ~»* L-l <l •- CI'

2: X s: *- X cc —

r«-

< •• Cl in or: LU f\J •

at it CC ~- •» CJ •> •-j

IS X

«£ s;

u IjCC .i.

c^ 2T-J OCO o

'J V.

i_J Li.

_J LL.

UJ L_'

> <_;

.

-.

_; lji. >_.

<-> U

CL X C*. £" » Q_ — —

I

LO -—• !—

'•—

< _"3 LL I

— <I |— Q-Q-CLtJJ •

ljI.Ys\-4U«N N N _ I- N C

Z 1 I; 'J_ CO «3 LL ^— •—<;:.- nr. ^ i. ll

il'l' JUJulU^UUiOj.u.ao.«UO-' '-' Z Z 2 2 ? ^ 1U J 'J 'J b 'J U Zi. >. >: i. i. >_ i. u <2" a. :•: i a. i. i. i. i—UUUGUUU'-'CUOOOOOUCJC

ox

r—LJ

X•ii-

CX

-OLL<1

ft

o

oc t—O Li>

a- zf~ x<t *tx ljo *

I-*

• i_)

—I X

—» or.

* r• O-

(Nl -J«• CL

<LI U--j d <- 'J in <

LO X — —

>

oUJ LU

lyO C-

ar:

J c i* * <j;

^. a \•--

•«- uj r i

(/> r^ f\l

C? > — -~

fM OII ll

I

_t

a x

it

a ii

ii ^.

c 3—

I

CL _£

U. <L X

CO

<r

ca

X

O t—

•-- LU

X

a or.

3 _< •—• cl uX X

<I

a 2 »—

a o k oX ^ O ZK- UJ ^ X«— •—

i

X "^

J3 —c? — x —

_£ CL * -~ LO —

LUX+

LUXI

LJ ~-

Q O* >

CL w. —

1

C/) O —•— I>C3 -t- >

LL L. ro U VXor.

-3

in

« i n ii

COll

<_»

rNI

II

LOI/)

CO

<

< u.—< — — LO— o i_' l:j —

<

LCJ '->.-f u< o o ii i—

i

II

j: • II 2 ||—

(_> O -"• OC ! —

II II —« LU CC w_J LL — t— UJ COCl .£ I— I. J t— —

I

l_i X C ^ LU £J

o

- 81 -

Page 164: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 165: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

m

x>oLUa:

LU->

<

oXDC

II

o

<1a.

CNJ

II

o

00X

00 x(A o00 —I

en

x>

a.<i1—

UJ

ft•

Oin

o-«

XCL

II

OJINI

—I

00

Q* 1—

o x

2. UJac t-LLI OJI- I

> J>* «•

3u •

— .x rj

CJ>

CDo

UU INI

CJ II

2 —<:

<f —' or. ~

O <M M

o 11 - u

i-i O "3— > >I K2 1—-)

I rx >—I CO V

I + —>

— . J>— rvj if

1/5 V r—

51 2-t- U1— ov- wo'_'

11

> c11 2-5 I

x

r-•

o11

X

rx.

.u

J- H-0/' ti)— Tf.

— X

if r-

(J *

2 OU -i iLMl j•• O" X

0L00

X+DCCJ3X+c;2OJ.5

X

X

CJC3

-U>

<1

00

Xo

*x u u•-I JP r—

X — U+ a o 13^ tyj •

_c _ ^-. —.

X O. • m+ « I— •

UJ CM II

— CJ ._/

C3 i-l LU<f LU 3

UJ

CJ 13

_i — c_- «» j: -a • iu• u_ u_ •—• uj x nr — • UJO.r^) — _)— r- <T r- 32 X. H r— *£ II < IX l/l Z .«£

Ia->Jf«H-llr-4 £ '""

l/> II "» II r— < H- "J , _j r——• O •" U- "*J 3C O w — r— «x

O- 'J- I— A U I— I— u. u. u^ U«-.t/)j.xi_) i j; « >- a u

i_) ->-

> oo-1

• • >o oO CJ ~ K—

'

«

O ir

* ft O *— — —• i—> 'NJ CNJ tr— — » #o. a. t— - —<i < ^ *- .— h- •— X *UJ LU IX i_J -,r

II II 'J- m K-

1

rxj — h- *_ — UU vl *o. o. i— s< < h a— I— 'X _Jai in j; a.

X - I—•- •> 00a (VI >(J • f)_S CJX —I r—> u_ u_-

CJ _J

UJ II 1—

J«. ?-•• ex

U CJ

x a5. CNJ— 3 •

o a oo - —

1

TvJ •> LL.

rj x- <r -

t— —1 11

CNJ —

«

J •

—1 ou. —

<

• u.— •-

11-11

CNJ

CJ—

4

LL.

ICJ?

!JJ

I— 2li a i_i 1—

1

Ji UJ I r- r-Xr- U ii/1

>— uOOO _i

CNJ r—(_J

I— I—2 -*—« •>

•-£ XCX LT.

-— OCNJ *—

*

^^ *—<

a.

<i -r- II

0J ->

- *

a. »<r #1— -*

IX, »

5" 00X LUa. ojj

U I—r— OO

<; r—

2 _)

— c_j

O LXn ^CNJ

o xO LUj x:

- I- if

X r—ff) •—

.

—I LJ— CJt— <

1/ v(j

'X <"3C Xix JT\

UJ -T .JJ <X L 'J

OJ

cr u »—

.'U.O

JCNJ

CNI

-. rx —-i ex

CNI

- LX •—

JC — or.

a: O X L..' Cx l_)

2 u_ g u_ ^ a.

l-J CJ_J

-J- in -0

CNI CNJ CNJ

- 82 -

Page 166: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 167: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

UJ ^ >*L

lo o *>c

»—

<

I

_0 o QCQ. • ^ UJO X UJ H-

1 m X Oj *•*

>- V. 2. 0^ t—

4

<_> -*• • <I vT •

2 • I— — • olu o O C o »—

1

»-H —

1

_J .—

i

u_U> LL OO »- 1— X »-

»—* • X lUi •> nLL - • D _l "

II

U_ II oo ^^ Z II 1—

JJ * Cj * v— * XH- a. <M » L5

O- -B- • D- )c •—

<

2- -ft• O 2. -Jl* LU

-J ..l ii .—

i

^3 fc- ^Q. * » u_ a. ">< -» ,;- «. •" m >*

•• #•/ X — •- a- XX o tl X * 'r\

in o- —J Q- w- n •«• •*

*v £ •- _1 K •N. % mr\j 3 f\J tv J$- !\J > •

• X • •• * • * in

O | o CO rt o ><* Xr-l >- w~t -u * --^ a- •-

U. O LL Q Yr u_ K -•- 2 •« •- "% » *. II

- UJ • —

»

* • oii — II rvj ^ II X 1— p»

•H- O -* w •* 4J- h- o —>

•* -< .V (j. # Jt" CJ t~ >a- a. Q. |t ^ JC

K- IX JJ E UJ # UJ >-

-* UJ 00 » uo •« _J —. >* •—

<

«~ 1—1 »• —> <.* u. _; —

i

_l M" u> —' UJ

* 2. n. *^ Lt- -Jr 2. UJ J_

« —

>

<_> a. l_J vi- 3 j>

-«- a. 1CL 1 -fr LL -> O

•» - c_i X ^ -> — > u.« LJ < 4- » 1

* X UJ — UJ ifc X --H

o Q. o X D O 5.UJ —•* l/l ~~. .—

1

#—

t

•—i UJ<S) m T\; •o a Q. «• O >-

—> -r • • f\J 2. s; ^ rsj l03 • u o •> _J • " >•

Lfc O JL -^ 1— Q. X o I— i/5

l_> — 3. u. ^J •l

^-i ^ -1 LL •J~) •» •* » Lj •X •—< »2. • n. .X »^ » <_) a. XLL. • 2: II u. un oj •» • LL L(>

ac ii v_l i •—

i

•^ X ii•-^ —t *^

J. »—

i

.J4.•-* H- ?j- z II PO «- H- Z

-L „- — * UJ < X -K a t— ii x. < ct±- >c o 1— S\ jr yr _3 < >- i- >: z>_> •» _j UJ —

t

:«: 3 -t — 1 LO — LL. h- CLL 1» u> l/» UL o O. * UJ h— < '.t UJ LU ^1• 1! • —

«

jE u_ « * 0L i —1 J. U. J. UJ—I (\J rr, >T

rvi

•-^ (\J

r~—

i

o

. PT .

Page 168: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 169: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

oo

*LUJ

•/ o • • • ^-< •

• O ;-} <_> o o U oo m O o O O O O m CJ o o »~i rj>

in _j O <-J o C_5 .—

i

'J o c\j IM (V IX CJ3 .—

i

C\l c- CO OD u •x\ t—

i

^T <r o- u_ f\J

.—

i

m ro r\j CM P»- .—

i

.—

<

LCLJO

• o • • CJ oj o • ..} • • • o • • fc—

»

CM <_>

o in o ' ) o O o o •j 'J o cj (— • min >r -j o -* .—

i

3 o J- 3 o o < —4 (M< —

<

in i—

1

1

t—t l_> m ro sJ *-J -o LU ^1 m—- —j m

7*

m U^ in

in

r*< ro>-

UJ

_Jz:

JJ—1

LU

uu o

oo

LT> in m m •^ f^ a- r— •—J rM in 00 i—

i

*z roIT\ in o •c • J- r-- m -r X> • •4"

z

r\j

t- X_d <i • • UJ oQ. t— • • o '_> • ij. »-^

^ <i c_> - j u UA u > s(J UJ <i^^ UJ CJ i_> «_> U •_> '_> o '_> •_) -\l lj» i_> — X m r— •

*T •o —

.

•—< in j >j- o u\ >T >o r • <1 z>

LU UJ CO O m in r\j-*- ,-~ t p I "M f\l -r J_ ;* o :l> fT>

_l ^. C\j m m m <r iti rM —4 f\J m J^ _^<

Q. —

«

•—

«

f\; - Q.

. o e; LO •-•

<a «£ <£ > A.i/l UJ V) l/)

• • • • • <_> l_> <J _) «_>

• vj —> (j u ij C ) J u'\ u'\ _> u~

o vn O c_> •*\J vsJ CM o r\j —* p>~ *j m •

f\J CO -J a. (, p-h cm "S. r\i o^ —

4

r^ • ou «J

c\j c\j CDf\J

t\l n » -T CM "" cm —

'

(\J r\j

o onOU

ao

_ 84 -

Page 170: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface
Page 171: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

153103Thesis

J543 JohanekOptimization of water-

jet propulsion systemfor surface effect ships

Thesis

J543 JohanekOptimization of water-

jet propulsion system

for surface effect ships.

Page 172: Optimization of water-jet propulsion system for surface

thesJ543

Optimization of water-jet propulsion sys

3 2768 002 10770 8DUDLEY KNOX LIBRARY