options for the environmental future of the river murray
DESCRIPTION
Judy Goode presents a seminar from the second Water Wednesday entitled "Options for the environmental future of the River Murray. Judy Goode is the SA River Murray Environmental Manager for the SA MDB NRM board.TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Options for the environmental future of the River Murray](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/5465c579af79597e338b4e79/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
The Environment Institute
Water Research Centre
Water WednesdayManaging the Murray Icon Sites:can engineering save the
environment
![Page 2: Options for the environmental future of the River Murray](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/5465c579af79597e338b4e79/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
WATER WEDNESDAY
Options for the environmental future of
the River Murray
Judy Goode
SA River Murray Environmental Manager
SA MDB NRM Board
![Page 3: Options for the environmental future of the River Murray](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/5465c579af79597e338b4e79/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Presentation Outline
– Overview of the River Murray
– Environmental challenges
– Functions and processes
– The Living Murray – Chowilla as a case study
– The Future?
![Page 4: Options for the environmental future of the River Murray](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/5465c579af79597e338b4e79/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Distribution of Australia’s
surface runoff
Source: Water and the
Australian Economy
– April 1999
1.0%
1.7%
0.4%
20.3%
23.3%
1.9%
0%
6.1%
0.3%
21.1%
10.6%
13.3%
![Page 5: Options for the environmental future of the River Murray](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/5465c579af79597e338b4e79/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
What sort of river is the Murray?
Naturally the river is:
– Extremely low gradient (1m:30km fromLake Victoria to Murray Mouth)
– Slow flowing
– Saline
– Turbid
– A river of extremes
and now in addition to these attributes:
– Highly regulated
– Greatly reduced flow
– Prolonged drought
![Page 6: Options for the environmental future of the River Murray](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/5465c579af79597e338b4e79/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
![Page 7: Options for the environmental future of the River Murray](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/5465c579af79597e338b4e79/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
![Page 8: Options for the environmental future of the River Murray](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/5465c579af79597e338b4e79/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
How has the river changed?
• Before diversions and regulation the mean (average) annual runoffwas ~25 000 gigalitres, of which 50% reached the sea afterevapo-transpiration, seepage and retention in wetlands etc
• Between 1920 and 2000, the level of diversion increased from~2000 gigalitres/year to ~12 000 gigalitres/year
• Extractions tripled in the 50 years to 1994
• In 2000, 61% diversions in NSW, 30% Victoria, 5.5% Queenslandand 3.5% SA – almost equivalent to the mean natural dischargepre-development
• Changes to flood flows due to storages and regulation
• Contemporary thinking is that a river is likely to exhibit significantstress if flow regime is reduced below 2/3 of natural (TLM SRP)
• Medium floods reduced from 1:3 to 1:8 years
![Page 9: Options for the environmental future of the River Murray](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/5465c579af79597e338b4e79/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
![Page 10: Options for the environmental future of the River Murray](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/5465c579af79597e338b4e79/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
![Page 11: Options for the environmental future of the River Murray](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/5465c579af79597e338b4e79/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Lake Victoria
Menindee Lakes
Dartmouth Dam
Hume Dam
Barmah Choke
![Page 12: Options for the environmental future of the River Murray](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/5465c579af79597e338b4e79/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
![Page 13: Options for the environmental future of the River Murray](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/5465c579af79597e338b4e79/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
![Page 14: Options for the environmental future of the River Murray](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/5465c579af79597e338b4e79/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
![Page 15: Options for the environmental future of the River Murray](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/5465c579af79597e338b4e79/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
![Page 16: Options for the environmental future of the River Murray](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/5465c579af79597e338b4e79/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
![Page 17: Options for the environmental future of the River Murray](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/5465c579af79597e338b4e79/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
![Page 18: Options for the environmental future of the River Murray](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/5465c579af79597e338b4e79/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
![Page 19: Options for the environmental future of the River Murray](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/5465c579af79597e338b4e79/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Factors Affecting the health of the system
• Significantly fewer floods - changes to flood frequency, timing and duration due to regulation and over-allocation
• Unseasonal delivery of water to support consumptive uses - high flowsnow predominantly delivered in summer/autumn cf natural delivery inwinter-spring
• Limited capacity to deliver water to SA
• Salinity build up on floodplain with limited flooding
• Flow times exacerbating management issues
• Risk of algal blooms due to low flows
• Deterioration of “river health” due to loss of connectivity between the river and the floodplain
• Conflicting management objectives – eg static water levels for irrigation and tourism vs weir pool manipulation for environmental outcomes
• Climate change and other risks
![Page 20: Options for the environmental future of the River Murray](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/5465c579af79597e338b4e79/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
CSIRO Sustainable Yields Project• Provides govts with estimate of water availability in the MDB on an
individual catchment and aquifer basis, taking into account climate change and other risks
• Reduced run off and end of system flows under median and extreme dry climate change scenarios (assuming current development and allocation policies, and no recovery of e-water)
– Best estimate median 2030 climate average annual runoff reduced by 10 per cent
– Extreme estimates range from 41% reduction in the Murray (dry extreme) to 7% increase (wet extreme)
• Significant increases in the average time between beneficial floods
• These hydrologic changes would have very serious consequences for ecosystem health
• Wet extreme would lead to little change in flood frequency
![Page 21: Options for the environmental future of the River Murray](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/5465c579af79597e338b4e79/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
What challenges does this present?Achieving a balance between the social, economic and
environmental outcomes of water management is a complex task facing water managers and governments
– Decisions taken in the past exploited the landscape for development and wealth
– Development over the last 100 years has resulted in biophysical, landscape scale change that we don‟t fully understand – river health has declined as the critical connection with floodplains has been reduced
– Biodiversity has significantly declined, including loss of native species and changes in vegetation – e.g. native fish populations estimated to be 10% of original numbers
– The long-term reliability and viability of all users depend on river health
– We are currently borrowing from the future
What are the shared and individual rights to the natural resources of the Basin and how are those rights to be managed?
![Page 22: Options for the environmental future of the River Murray](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/5465c579af79597e338b4e79/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
What challenges does this present?The River Murray is a highly regulated river that supports communities and
regional/State economies, at the expense of the environment. How do we redress the imbalance?
• More water is clearly the answer, but we also:
– Need to „do more with less‟
– Important to identify key environmental assets using scientifically robust and consistent criteria, prioritisation frameworks and methodologies
– Take a one-River approach – Basin Plan?
– System approach – scalar
– Restoration projects - identify and agree key ecological processes
– Adaptive management approach – requires significant investment in monitoring, data interpretation
– Innovative solutions – engineering?
– Make explicit trade-offs and recognise the impacts
![Page 23: Options for the environmental future of the River Murray](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/5465c579af79597e338b4e79/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
• Owing to the inherent complexity of rivers and an incomplete understanding of river systems, restoration projects that focus on reinstating ecological process are likely to be more successful than those which focus on fixed end points, particularly when:
There is a recognition that process and hence restoration projects are ongoing.
They are conducted at an appropriate scale. They are conducted with appropriate and sufficient scientific
monitoring. They are conducted within a multi-disciplinary and adaptive
management framework.
• Restoration of processes focuses on the causes of system degradation rather than the symptoms
FUNCTIONS AND PROCESSES
![Page 24: Options for the environmental future of the River Murray](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/5465c579af79597e338b4e79/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
• Long-term strategies for managing flow regimes, land use and native biota are critical for restoring ecological integrity to rivers
• Temporal considerations are fundamental to river restoration. The natural timing, frequency, duration, magnitude and rates
of change of flow are each vital in restoring ecological processes
• Rare events (e.g. large floods which change river morphology) are also important and can have long lasting effects
• Temporal considerations need to recognize that natural variability is an inherent feature of river systems
• Hence restoration of an acceptable range of processes is more likely to succeed than restoration aimed at a fixed end point
Process based river restoration: Time scales
![Page 25: Options for the environmental future of the River Murray](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/5465c579af79597e338b4e79/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
• Connectivity is an important ecological process
• Restoration projects should consider key processes and linkages beyond the channel reach, e.g. upstream/downstream connectivity, floodplain and hypoheic/groundwater connectivity
• Because physical, chemical, and biological processes are interconnected in complex ways across river systems, projects undertaken at this scale are more likely to be successful
• Because both technical and social constraints often preclude „full‟ restoration , rehabilitation should focus on the causes of system degradation through attainable reestablishment of processes and elements
Process based river restoration: Spatial scales
![Page 26: Options for the environmental future of the River Murray](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/5465c579af79597e338b4e79/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Purposeful move away from traditional focus on localised restoration to a landscape perspective (eg. habitat restoration and protection).
• Is there a response to local habitat reintroduction?
• How does the distribution of (restored) habitat influence the response of plants and animals?
• Where in the landscape should we invest for best outcomes?
• How do we prioritise environmental assets for water and works?
Theories and mechanisms of landscape ecology and hydrology
![Page 27: Options for the environmental future of the River Murray](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/5465c579af79597e338b4e79/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Example – managing individual habitats/issues
• Often isolated and uncoordinated
interventions at isolated sites
Source: Nick Bond
Removing willows
Re-snagging
Wetlands
Riparian revegetation
Environmental flows
Erosion control
![Page 28: Options for the environmental future of the River Murray](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/5465c579af79597e338b4e79/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Example – restoring populations & communities
Spawning habitat
Residential
habitat
Residential
habitat
Refuge
habitatResidential
habitat
Spawning habitat
•Coordinated restoration so
that interactions occur among
‘sites’.Source: Nick Bond
![Page 29: Options for the environmental future of the River Murray](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/5465c579af79597e338b4e79/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Critical Important Optional Desirable
Drought Average Flood
Scalable Site Management
Water Availability
Less More
![Page 30: Options for the environmental future of the River Murray](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/5465c579af79597e338b4e79/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Some local benefits but
many higher floodplain
areas still under-watered
Flow manipulation
![Page 31: Options for the environmental future of the River Murray](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/5465c579af79597e338b4e79/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Picture courtesy Fosters
![Page 32: Options for the environmental future of the River Murray](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/5465c579af79597e338b4e79/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
![Page 33: Options for the environmental future of the River Murray](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/5465c579af79597e338b4e79/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Lake Littra pre-watering
13/9/2004
![Page 34: Options for the environmental future of the River Murray](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/5465c579af79597e338b4e79/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Lake Littra post-watering
23/3/2006
![Page 35: Options for the environmental future of the River Murray](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/5465c579af79597e338b4e79/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Twin Creeks pre-watering 2004
![Page 36: Options for the environmental future of the River Murray](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/5465c579af79597e338b4e79/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Twin Creeks post-watering 2004
![Page 37: Options for the environmental future of the River Murray](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/5465c579af79597e338b4e79/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
General Description
Monoman Island Horseshoe
pre -watering August 2004
![Page 38: Options for the environmental future of the River Murray](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/5465c579af79597e338b4e79/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Monoman Island Horseshoe post
watering December 2004
![Page 39: Options for the environmental future of the River Murray](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/5465c579af79597e338b4e79/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Impacts of short-term actions
• Not sustainable long-term
• Does not address issues of connectivity
• Localised and small scale
• Expensive
• Only benefits some communities
• Not system approach
• Dose not necessarily target the highest priorities
![Page 40: Options for the environmental future of the River Murray](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/5465c579af79597e338b4e79/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Case Study - Chowilla Regulator
![Page 41: Options for the environmental future of the River Murray](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/5465c579af79597e338b4e79/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Current condition
![Page 42: Options for the environmental future of the River Murray](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/5465c579af79597e338b4e79/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Do Nothing 30 yr
![Page 43: Options for the environmental future of the River Murray](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/5465c579af79597e338b4e79/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Chowilla Ck Regulator
![Page 44: Options for the environmental future of the River Murray](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/5465c579af79597e338b4e79/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
![Page 45: Options for the environmental future of the River Murray](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/5465c579af79597e338b4e79/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
![Page 46: Options for the environmental future of the River Murray](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/5465c579af79597e338b4e79/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
![Page 47: Options for the environmental future of the River Murray](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/5465c579af79597e338b4e79/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Natural inundation at 10,000 ML/day
![Page 48: Options for the environmental future of the River Murray](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/5465c579af79597e338b4e79/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Area inundated with regulator at 10,000 ML/day
![Page 49: Options for the environmental future of the River Murray](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/5465c579af79597e338b4e79/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Natural inundation at 70,000 ML/day
![Page 50: Options for the environmental future of the River Murray](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/5465c579af79597e338b4e79/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
• Can be used at all flows to about 50,000 ML/day
• Levels can be raised up to 19.87 – 3.5 m increase
• Lock 6 to be raised 62 cm to top of piers
• Flow maintained through Chowilla Ck at all times
• Maintenance of velocity is important
• Likely to be operated 1 year in 3 on average
• Preference for >10,000 ML/day QSA for fulloperation
Regulator Operation
![Page 51: Options for the environmental future of the River Murray](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/5465c579af79597e338b4e79/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Recorded flow to SA (1977-2005)
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
1200003/1
/77
3/1
/78
3/1
/79
3/1
/80
3/1
/81
3/1
/82
3/1
/83
3/1
/84
3/1
/85
3/1
/86
3/1
/87
3/1
/88
3/1
/89
3/1
/90
3/1
/91
3/1
/92
3/1
/93
3/1
/94
3/1
/95
3/1
/96
3/1
/97
3/1
/98
3/1
/99
3/1
/00
3/1
/01
3/1
/02
3/1
/03
3/1
/04
3/1
/05
Year
Flo
w
recorded f low to SA
![Page 52: Options for the environmental future of the River Murray](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/5465c579af79597e338b4e79/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
1200003/1
/77
3/1
/78
3/1
/79
3/1
/80
3/1
/81
3/1
/82
3/1
/83
3/1
/84
3/1
/85
3/1
/86
3/1
/87
3/1
/88
3/1
/89
3/1
/90
3/1
/91
3/1
/92
3/1
/93
3/1
/94
3/1
/95
3/1
/96
3/1
/97
3/1
/98
3/1
/99
3/1
/00
3/1
/01
3/1
/02
3/1
/03
3/1
/04
3/1
/05
Year
Flo
w
recorded flow to SA
simulated f low w ith regulator
Hypothetical Operational Regime
9 operations in 29 years
![Page 53: Options for the environmental future of the River Murray](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/5465c579af79597e338b4e79/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
• Restoration of a floodplain regime that moreclosely resembles natural
• Enable 78% of RRG and 31% Black Boxwoodlands to be restored
• Inundation of large areas of other floodplaincommunities, including 91% of wetlands andother watercourses, 75% of river coobah and58% of floodplain grasslands
Benefits
![Page 54: Options for the environmental future of the River Murray](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/5465c579af79597e338b4e79/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
• Real time salinity impacts
• Inhibits large bodied fish movement
• Blackwater events
• Weed infestation
• Algal blooms
• Operational objectives?
Risks
![Page 55: Options for the environmental future of the River Murray](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/5465c579af79597e338b4e79/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
QUESTIONS?