or how to report lung function tests
TRANSCRIPT
or
How to report lung function tests
Clinical pulmonary physiology
Lung function testing
• A brief history
• Why measure?
• What can you measure?
• Interpretation/ reporting
• Examples and case histories
• Exercise tests
• SCE questions
A brief history of spirometry
• 129-200 AD Galen got a boy to
blow into a bladder
• 1714 James Jurin measured tidal
volume and vital capacity
• 1840 John Hutchinson measured
vital capacity in 4000 people
• 1947 Robert Tiffineau described
FEV1 and FEV1/FVC ratio
• 1950s-1980s Modern clinical
respiratory physiology era
Respiratory physiology hall of fame
What are lung function tests for?
Diagnosis
Disease monitoring
Assessment for therapy
Therapeutic response
Assessment of disability/impairment
What is available?
CORE
• Airway function
– Spirometry
– Peak flow
– f/v loop
– Raw/SGaw
• Lung volumes
– He dilution
– Plethysmography
– Radiology
• Gas exchange
– TLCO/KCO
– ABGs
– SpO2
EXTENDED
• Respiratory muscle tests
– Pi&Pe Max
– Sniff
– Supine VC
• Bronchial challenge testing
• Sleep
– SpO2
– Polysomnography
• Exercise testing
– EIA
– Metabolic gas exchange
Interpretation of Lung function tests
OPINION
Physical descriptione.g. volumes
Airway functionFEV1 etc
Gas exchangeTLCO & ABGs
Reference values
Range
% predicted
Standardised residual (1.64 SD)
ATS/ERS algorithm for lung function diagnosis
ERS/ATS Interpretation strategies
Two tasks
1. “The classification of derived values with respect to a
reference population and assessment of the reliability of the
data”
(laboratory task)
2. “The integration of the obtained values into the diagnosis,
therapy and prognosis for an individual”
(physicians task)
ATS/ERS task force:standardisation of lung function testing No 1ERJ 2005: 26:153-161
The report structure
Technical
Simple pattern description
Relevant variations – Reference values
Explain anomalies– Poor effort– Best loop– Mouthpiece leaks– Coughing etc
Quality control– VCs equal– VA < TLC
Suggestions for further investigation
Clinician’s
Answer the question
Values in context
Confirm diagnosis
Suggest differential diagnosis
Further investigation
Advice on further management
Reference Equations
• Obtained from healthy subjects
• Gender, age and height
• Make your own
• Use reference equations for local population
• Use ECCS or ATS
• Ethnic correction
• GLI (Global, multi ethnic, all ages)
Lung function: categories of interpretation
Obstructive
– FEV1/VC
– Loop
– Raw
– TLC
– RV/TLC
– Gas trapping (TLC-VA)
Restrictive
– FEV1/VC
– TLC, RV
– TLCO (KCO)
Constrictive
– TLC (n RV)
– KCO
COPD, asthma, emphysema
“Big lungs”
ILD, sarcoid etc
“Small lungs”
Muscle weakness, obesity, scoliosis
“Squashed lungs”
Common requests
SOB ? Cause (COPD, ILD)
Is it asthma or COPD?
Upper airway obstruction?
Fit for surgery?
Disease progression?
Confirm diagnosis
What is the prognosis?
Is it asthma or COPD?
• Young patient• <20 pack year smoking history• Airway obstruction• PFTS may be normal!• Good bronchodilator response (normal or
600ml)
• May need to suggest – Explore the history further– Peak flow monitoring– PC20 etc– FeNO/ Sputum eosinophils
Is it upper airway obstruction?
Low FEV1/ FVC % ( not helpful )
Shape of spirogram (slow rise)
Appearance of flow volume loop
Airways resistance (Raw or SGaw)
Empey Index (FEV1 ml/PFR L/Min) >8
You can’t always tell!
Upper airway obstruction
Fit for surgery?Beware!
The anaesthetist knows best
Describe the situation
Point out the unusual (UAO etc)
Suggest how treatment can be improved
Some operations have less effect on lung function than others
– Eyes and prostate ok
– Abdominal and thoracic surgery worse
– Prediction pathways (SWT, V/Q etc)
Some surgery can improve lung function
– Decortication
– Bullectomy
– LVRS
– Transplantation
Prevalence of COPD is
overestimated > 50years
Bronchodilator response
• Various definitions
• 12% change in FEV1
• >200ml FEV
• >8% predicted FEV1
Miscellaneous reporting pitfalls
Look at the loop! (minor abnormalities,site & nature of AO)
Bronchodilator response in all? (not just FEV1)
What sort of TLC? BOX> He Dilution> VA
TLCO ( remember the haemoglobin etc)
Reference values (the normal abnormal)
Ethnic origin (10%)
Case 1
SOBE?
Case 1 Report
Context
Older lady, ex smoker, BMI 33
Airways
Unobstructed, restrictive pattern, lower range of normal.
Loop unhelpful
Lung Volumes
TLC 57% predicted, RV <50% predicted
Gas transfer
Low TLCO, relatively preserved KCO
Diagnosis and advice?
Case 1 Report
• Lung function test compatible with a severe restrictive
disorder. Low RV suggests intrinsic lung disease e.g IPF.
• Arterial blood gases would be helpful
• Suggest repeat PFTs after further investigation to monitor
progress or treatment response (VC 68%)
Case 2
Previous abnormal CXRProgress?
Case Report 2
Context
Age 33, BMI 23, Ex smoker, Previous lung function tests.
Airways
Previous tests shown mild airflow obstruction. Current test shows a restrictive pattern with recent fall in values. Still mild airflow obstruction on loop.
Lung Volumes
Sudden fall, TLC 60% predicted, RV <50% predicted
Gas transfer
Low TLCO, preserved KCO.
Diagnosis and advice?
Case Report 2
Previous PFTs show a mild mixed picture (AO + low RV)
No features of upper airway obstruction
Significant development of more severe restrictive pattern
Mixed picture compatible with ILD and smoking history or
sarcoidosis
Suggest repeat tests after treatment with corticosteroids
(two months)
Case 3
Progressive dyspnoea
Case Report 3
Context
Age 22 BMI 24, never smoked, lung function tests two years previously
Airways
Previous restrictive pattern worsened over time. FEV1 now 38% pred.
Lung Volumes
Low TLC (39%Pred), RV/TLC ratio 32%
Gas transfer
Low TLCO, High KCO.
Diagnosis and advice?
Case Report 3
• Severe restrictive pattern with progressive deterioration
• Preservation of RV/TLV ratio and KCO suggests external
restriction (constrictive pattern)
• Causes might include muscle weakness, scoliosis etc
• FEV1< 40% predicted indicates that ventilatory failure may
be imminent
• Suggest muscle studies, ABGs and sleep study as
appropriate
Why is the TLCO low?
Nocturnal hypoventilation
Case 4
Suitable for surgery?
Case Report 4
ContextAge 69, BMI 21, Previous lung function tests.
AirwaysSevere airflow obstruction, FEV1 23% predictedPressure dependent airway collapse on loopNo bronchodilator response performed
Lung VolumesGross hyperinflation on plethysmographyRV/TLC ratio 69%TLC-VA > 500ml (3L gas trapping)
Gas transferTLCO 25% predicted, low KCO, ABGs?
Diagnosis and advice?
Case Report 4
• Severe airflow obstruction with features of emphysema (loop and KCO)
• Gross hyperinflation and gas trapping
• Progressive deterioration
• Potentially suitable for LVRS (hyperinflation, FEV1, KCO>20% predicted)
• Other helpful investigations would include ABGs, SWT and imaging
Exercise is good for you
The uses of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (performance testing, diagnostic, laboratory and field)
• The differential diagnosis of breathlessness
• The objective assessment of impairment/disability
• Guide to prognosis
• The assessment of therapeutic intervention (drugs/rehab/LVRS)
• Preoperative assessment
• Training prescription
Spirometry and exercise performance
The context of exercise assessment in lung disease
Scientific exploration
Functional performance measures
Physical (domestic) activity
Methods Laboratory
(CPET)
Laboratory
(endurance)
ADL Questionnaires
Field testing (6MWD, ISWT,ESWT)
Physical activity monitors
Questionnaires (MRC, PFSS)
Methods of objective exercise testing in clinical
practice
Laboratory (Various platforms)
• Symptom-limited incremental test
• Constant workload (power) test
Field (walking)Tests
• Six minute walk
• Incremental shuttle walk test
• Endurance shuttle walk tests
Laboratory based exercise tests (CPET)
Gold standard
Precise physiological data
Expensive
Incremental exercise response in health
VO2
Time/workload
VO2maximal
“Metabolic threshold”
t
VE
HR/CO
VT
%VO2maxsustainable
CPET for diagnosis for diagnosis of unexplained
breathlessness
– Heart or lungs?
– Lack of fitness ?
– Dysfunctional breathing?
– Obesity?
– Normal but uncompetitive
Interpretation of the Symptom Limited Maximal
Incremental Exercise Test
• Has the subject made a good effort ?
• Have they achieved normal values ?
• Why did they stop ?
• How did they get there? (physiological response)
Has the subject made a good effort?
• Plateau of VO2 Max
• Patient exhaustion
• HR or VE close to predicted maximum
• Blood lactate > 4 mmol/L
• Respiratory Exchange Ratio >1.2
Reference values for exercise tests (VO2)
• E.g. Jones N.L. Am Rev Respir Dis 1985 131,700-8
• Age and Gender (ht and wt)
• Mostly USA
• Nearly all on cycle
• Small numbers (50)
• Mixed active and sedentary
See Cooper for combined equations
Why did they stop?
Identification of a ventilatory or cardiac limit to exercise
Ventilatory
• VE max > 80% VE max predicted (MVV)
• Ventilatory reserve (VE max pred- VE max) < 11 L/min
• VT > 50-70% of VC
• Breathing frequency > 50 min
• PaCO2 rise
Cardiovascular
• Chest pain
• High heart rate (220-age)
• Low Oxygen pulse
• Low AT
Interpretation
• Algorithmic (Wasserman)– Determined by VO2 peak and AT
– Can be computerised
• Analytical– Examination of data
– Pattern recognition
– Fixed point comparison (VO2 1.0 L/min, VE 30 L/min)
VO2 PEAK AT VD/VT SaO2 O2 pulse
VO2/HR
VE/VO2 HRR
Cardiac
Disease (may
be limited by
chest pain)
Low Low Normal Normal Low High Nil
Pulmonary
vascular
disease
Low Low High Low Low High Nil
Airway
Obstruction
Low High or
absent
High Normal Normal High High
Interstitial
Lung Disease
Low High or
absent
High Low Normal High
(High Bf
and low
VT)
High
Chest Wall
Restriction
Low High or
absent
Normal Normal/low Normal Normal
(High Bf
and low VT
High
Poor effort Low High or
Absent
Normal Normal (or
high)
Normal Normal High
Patterns of exercise abnormality
SCE Questions
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�