orange white paper
TRANSCRIPT
8/3/2019 Orange White Paper
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/orange-white-paper 1/10
e Orange White Paper Teamwork and Your Bottom Line
by Adrian Gostick and Chester Elton
Based on a 350,000 person study of Managers and Employees
featured in e Orange Revolution
8/3/2019 Orange White Paper
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/orange-white-paper 2/10
Teamwork and Your Bottom Line 2
Contents:
Introduction
Why is Orange the New Green?
1.0 eConcernsaboutTeamwork
1.1 e Data on Teamwork
1.1.1 Teamwork has Become Cliché
1.1.2 Teamwork is Not Practiced
1.1.3 e Key Components and Benets are Unounded
2.0 ePathofBreakthroughTeams
2.1 Does research correlate with reality?
2.2 e Components o the Orange Path
3.0 Where’stheMoneyinTeamwork?
Case Study: Following the Money o Teamwork
3.1 Evidence o Economic Perormance
4.0 WheretostartyourOrangeRevolution?
4.1 Message Consistency
4.2 Training
4.3 Ideas and Repetition
8/3/2019 Orange White Paper
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/orange-white-paper 3/10
Teamwork and Your Bottom Line 3
e Orange White PaperTeamwork and Your Bottom Line
Introduction: Does Orange Create Green?
Orange is a color o transition. And in business, an Orange Revolution is a transormation o a teamrom good to great.
An Orange Revolution in the corporate world is not intended to conquer a regime. Instead, it begins
in the hearts o team members—men and women ocused on overcoming barriers, exceeding
expectations, and producing exceptional results.
e question is: does the data prove this idea that a new standard o teamwork can bolster your
bottom line?
at’s exactly what the authors set out to do—prove that by improving your teams, you’ll improve
your prots.
1.0—e Concerns about Teamwork
Teamwork is one o the most written about subjects in business, and yet one where remarkably little
hard data has been gleaned to prove i long-held assumptions about how people work together are
accurate. It’s one reason “teamwork” is viewed by many organizations as a fuy cliché.
In the eld o psychology, there is a large body o theory that analyzes how individual behavior diers
rom group behavior—and, even more specically, how people make dierent decisions i they’re
teamed with others. O course, it’s easy to assume there are great dierences between individual
decisions and group decisions. But, the question remains: which is better? Or, more specically: which
produces better results—individual decisions or group decisions?
Our goal was to nd the data or business leaders. Do great teams produce better results than
individuals alone can achieve?
1.1eDataonTeamwork
For 20 years now we’ve entrenched ourselves into the inner-workings o organizations across the globe.
We didn’t start our research ocusing on teamwork—we were ocused on employee recognition and
the role appreciation could play in building stronger cultures. We ocused on understanding how to
accelerate human perormance on an individual level. And, although our theories were proven accurate
through a 10-year, 200,000 person study throughout North America, and then a global study wecommissioned in 2008, a nding arose that we couldn’t ignore: one o the primary drivers o human
and organizational perormance is in the strength o the team. It was that data we could not ignore.
Perhaps some o the most denitive results to support this teamwork theory came rom our study
measuring employee engagement in 13 countries conducted exclusively or us by independent
researchers Towers Watson in late 2008. We learned that doing work that matters in a team
8/3/2019 Orange White Paper
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/orange-white-paper 4/10
Teamwork and Your Bottom Line 4
environment makes a statistically signicant impact on employee willingness to work harder, longer,
and with substantially higher levels o engagement. e global study showed us:
• Employees who understand how their work as a team aects the overall goals o the organization
reported a 75% engagement rate.
• Employees who didn’t understand how or i their work as a team aected the overall goals o the
organization reported a 64% engagement rate.
An 11 percent variance in engagement indicates that something remarkable happens when we
understand that our team makes an impact on the larger organizational success. And yet we wanted
more details: how can individual teams impact an organization, how do intelligent group decisions
produce results, and how we could tap into the true brilliance o teamwork.
As we dug into details—interviewing some o the most productive, creative teams in the world, and
collecting data rom an additional commissioned study—we began to uncover the similarities between
attitudes, processes, and perspectives o great teams. And, sadly, we learned why so many organizations who attempt to inspire teamwork ail.
Really, i teamwork is so powerul, then why isn’t everyone a master team member?
1.1.1TeamworkhasBecomeCliché
Sadly, we’ve ound that the word “teamwork” has been diluted through the last ten years. It’s been
tossed around so liberally inside organizations that people think it’s just a buzzword—because it’s not
politically correct to call an employee a worker, a subordinate, or even a crewmember anymore. And,
maybe there’s a small antasy that i you label people “a team” they’ll perorm like one. In the process
o this lip-service, the true denition o a coveted entity has been bleached.
1.1.2TeamworkisNotPracticed
Many leaders today are “selling” a notion o teamwork that simply boils down to: “I’ll call you a team
as long as you play by my rules.” ese managers might argue that it is leadership, not collaboration,
that is the great separator between marginal and magnicent. However, our data proves that typically
the main thing that denes a great leader is, in act, the perormance o their team.
1.1.3eKeyComponentsandBenetsareUnfounded
Interestingly enough, when we ask managers i teamwork accelerates perormance, almost all o them
will answer with an overwhelming “yes.” However, when we take the question one step urther, and ask,
“Why … why are teams more productive than individuals?” or “How … how do you structure people
to work together eectively?” the answers are vague. e simple truth is that most managers do not
know the key components o great teams, and do not understand the concrete benets o teamwork.
8/3/2019 Orange White Paper
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/orange-white-paper 5/10
Teamwork and Your Bottom Line 5
2.0 e Path of Breakthrough Teams
is is where teamwork gets interesting: our 350,000-person research study has shown there is a
common methodology to breakthrough teams. at means that great teams aren’t necessarily
composed o great team members, but instead, they’re composed o great team practices.
ese practices when perormed create a very specic “Orange Path” to the creation o esprit de corps
and, most importantly, breakthrough results. But, what’s even more intriguing is this: no matter how
we spliced the data, or which great team we analyzed, the Orange Path revealed itsel. I teams ollow
the path, they all end up in the same location—success.
2.1 Does research correlate with reality?
In the process o writing the book e Orange Revolution, we asked the Best Companies Group to
conduct a research study o 2009 and 2008 data to determine the path o breakthrough success o
teams. e hard numbers rom this survey o more than 350,000 people were illuminating, but still we
weren’t satised. e looming question that remained was: could we dig inside some o the world’smost renowned and successul teams to nd these same traits? And, what does it mean or an
organization’s bottom-line?
In e Orange Revolution we spotlight numerous teams: Pepsi Beverages Company, Zappos.com,
Apple, Texas Roadhouse, U.S. Foodservice, and the list continues. Some o the companies we
specically approached because we had been inormed that they practiced the traits along the Orange
Path, but others we approached and researched simply because they had accomplished something
amazing—and we wanted to nd out how teamwork played a role.
Sure enough, i they had accomplished breakthrough results, it wasn’t just a matter o great leadership.
Instead, it was methodology o teamwork—the same methodology we had witnessed in our research.
2.2eComponentsoftheOrangePath
As we studied the data and interviewed managers and team members rom organizations around the
globe, we uncovered similar components that existed within breakthrough teams:
1. Every breakthrough team—those teams that change the world—start with and share a common
cause. e ultimate vision o great teams is the same, and the motivation to achieve this simple,
cohesive cause is shared by all members. It didn’t matter which industry or the nature o the
cause. All teams that win understand the shared cause—rom winning a Super Bowl ring, to
leaving all customers with smiles on their aces, and even in some organizations like a commercial
cleaning ranchise we met, to operate so fawlessly that your clients take you or granted.
2. e teams adhere to/and commonly practice the Basic Four o Leadership + Recognition, which
includes: Goal-Setting, Communication, Trust, and Accountability. ese Basic Four are the
gold-standards o leadership. Add purposed recognition—meaning employees eel appreciated
or their above-and-beyond eorts—and perormance is accelerated beyond imagination. ese
concepts are detailed in our earlier books like e Carrot Principle.
8/3/2019 Orange White Paper
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/orange-white-paper 6/10
Teamwork and Your Bottom Line 6
3. Here is the lie-blood o our research on breakthrough teams. All great teams adhere to the
Rule o 3:
• Wow—e standard perormance o great teams is always world-class.
• No Surprises—All team members are accountable or openness, honest debate, and eachknows what to expect rom the others.
• Cheer—Team members support, recognize, appreciate, and cheer others and the group
on to victory.
e Rule o 3 is critical to team success. In e Orange Revolution, each rule is detailed into
steps taken to achieve mastery.
4. ese teams achieve a heightened level o Esprit De Corps, with corresponding increases in
ocus, loyalty, engagement, and satisaction. Esprit De Corps isn’t as much o a practice as it is
an understanding. ose employees who have experienced esprit de corps on a high-
perormance team know what it means, what it eels like, and how it drives perormance.
Together these components create the Orange Path. Again, they are practiced by all breakthrough teams.
Goal-Setting
Communication
Trust
Accountability+
Recognition
Breakthrough Results
or Sustained Success
Basic Four
The Cause
Focus
Loyalty
Engagement
Satisfaction
TeamEsprit de corps
Wow
No
Surprises
Cheer
8/3/2019 Orange White Paper
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/orange-white-paper 7/10
Teamwork and Your Bottom Line 7
3.0 Where’s the Money in Teamwork?
Finally, we wanted to know about the green o Orange Teams. No one can deny that the team that
created the iPod generated a great deal o prot. And it’s hard to argue that the stellar teams at
Zappos.com—a seemingly instantaneous megaorce in online retail—didn’t have everything to do with
the company’s success. Still, we wanted to dig deeper. Obviously, great companies, made up o greatteams, create great returns. But boil it down to something simpler. Does a great team create better
results than a great group o individual perormers? Are group decisions better?
We called upon Mark Potter, Associate Proessor o Finance, Babson College, and co-author o
Perormance Characteristics o Individual vs. Team Managed Mutual Funds or answers.
CaseStudy:FollowingtheMoneyofTeamwork
“ere’s a great deal o evidence that avors a team’s decision making ability instead o an individual’s
ability,” says Mark Potter, Associate Proessor o Finance, Babson College, and co-author o
Perormance Characteristics o Individual vs. Team Managed Mutual Funds. “e evidence is
particularly compelling or perormance and risk-taking activities, like mutual und management.”
Potter, along with his colleagues and co-authors, Richard T. Bliss, Babson College, and Christopher
Schwarz, University o Caliornia at Irvine set out to discover the best management approach when it
comes to mutual und management.
To date, relatively little attention has been devoted to deciphering the dierences between individual-
managed portolios and team-managed portolios. Potter and his associates compiled research over a
12-year period.
“It’s ascinating,” says Potter. “I you’re wondering the saest place or your money—a team-managed
approach is much less risky.”
In their research, Potter and his team concluded that:
• Team unds have signicantly lower risk than their individually managed counterparts and exhibit
lower cross-sectional dierences in their perormance and systematic portolio actor loadings.
• Perormance o mutual unds managed by teams is similar to individually managed unds on a
risk-adjusted basis, in spite o team-managed unds growing at a signicantly greater rate over
twelve years.
• Team managed unds have signicantly lower expenses and loads than individually managed unds.
“at’s just the tip,” adds Potter. “Findings unrelated to investment management indicate that groups,
on average, make superior decisions compared with individuals. Research that we ound reveals that
groups make better decisions due to pooling and aggregating disparate pieces o inormation to orm a
better decision. And another study nds that groups recall inormation more accurately, leading to
better-inormed decisions.”
8/3/2019 Orange White Paper
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/orange-white-paper 8/10
Teamwork and Your Bottom Line 8
What about the time required to reach a decision? Are teams slower than individuals?
Says Potter, “is may be one o the most surprising ndings: ere is no dierence in the time it takes
teams and individuals to reach a decision, even though group decisions were superior. e bottom line is
this: team-managed unds exhibit marginally lower risk, more persistent returns, and experience
greater infows over time.”
3.1EvidenceofEconomicPerformance
Results o our research continued to astound us as we dug deeper. rough data and interviews we ound:
• Employees who elt they were part o a strong team reported that they were more likely to work
longer business hours to help their team members.
• Managers reported witnessing much more requent “above-and-beyond” activities rom
employees who were part o a strong team.
• Employees who reported eeling that they were part o a strong team revealed stronger pride intheir corporation.
• Employees who reported having riends in their work groups were much less likely to report
plans to leave the organization.
• Employees who elt they were part o a strong team scored much higher in employee engagement
categories.
e list o benets rom building strong teams could continue—and all the data is detailed in
e Orange Revolution. However, in viewing the whole, with greater engagement, commitment to
success, and satisaction in the workplace, the most compelling piece o evidence (variable rom
organization to organization) may be this: In the companies where employees reported strong levels
o esprit de corps, breakthrough accomplishments could be pinpointed, and bottom-line results
could be attributed to those accomplishments. And, in company’s where teamwork levels were poor,
marginal returns were obvious.
4.0 Where to start your Orange Revolution?
“Where do we start?” is the rst question we are typically asked by managers or team leaders who
have either read our books or attended one o our speeches. It’s one thing to call your group a team,
but it’s another to truly act like one.
e studies we have conducted in the last two decades—now totaling more than hal a millionemployees globally—have shown us that teamwork training, education and practice are vital to achieving
optimal acceleration o perormance. Committing to e Rule o 3 isn’t necessarily easy. Start by dening
the world-class results you and your team want to achieve through Wow. Learn to communicate openly
and rankly and actively achieve a No Surprises culture. And, learn to Cheer each other on with strategic
purpose. Esprit de Corps doesn’t happen overnight. It cannot be mandated. And it is only through
actively perorming and practicing the Orange Path that breakthrough teamwork can be achieved.
8/3/2019 Orange White Paper
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/orange-white-paper 9/10
Teamwork and Your Bottom Line 9
4.1MessageConsistency
One important actor when it comes to
initiating an Orange Revolution in your
organization is the creation o message
consistency. A proessional speaker canintroduce the concept, use eective
terminology, and explain the do’s and
don’ts. Having a strong consistent message is
key to getting all team members in your
organization on the same page and the same
timeline. For inormation on our keynote
speeches visit carrots.com/authors.
4.2Training
Although it sounds easy to practice teamwork, we’ve ound the organizations that are reaping thebiggest results are those that train their teams. Practice, practice, practice makes perect. And, even
when you reach a heightened level o esprit de corps, it’s still important to brush up on your skills.
ink about it. Just because a team wins the championship game doesn’t mean they can stop
practicing. For inormation on Orange training programs, visit carrots.com/training. Training or
organizations is available via classroom, train-the-trainer, or online ormats.
4.3IdeasandRepetition
Just as important as it is to live in your Orange Revolution, it is just as vital to challenge your skills and
ideas. e Orange Revolution oers numerous tips on how to build esprit de corps. However, it’s also
important to choose an Orange champion within your organization. Create monthly meetings wheremanagers, team leaders and employees can share stories about what is working with their teams and
what might not be. Ask others in your proession what they do to instill esprit de corps. One piece o
advice may not work inside every team or company, but it may inspire ideas. For inormation on our
books, or to gather tips, reports, case studies or white papers ocused on recognition visit carrots.com.
“Breakthrough Teams possess a revolutionary
mindset, where eorts are ocused on creating
positive transormation, and results. Each
member demonstrates personal competency
while sharing in a unifed cause.”
8/3/2019 Orange White Paper
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/orange-white-paper 10/10
About the Authors
New York Times and Wall Street Journal bestselling authors and
acclaimed speakers Adrian Gostick and Chester Elton have spent the
past 20 years researching and speaking to the world’s best companies
such as Pepsi, DHL, KPMG, Wal-Mart and Avis Budget Group.
Considered “e thought leaders on employee engagement,” Gostick
and Elton have appeared on CBS’s 60 Minutes, NBC’s Today Show,
CNN, ABC and National Public Radio. eir work has been quoted in
the New York Times, Fortune, e Economist , Newsweek and many
other publications.
Gostick and Elton are the leaders o O. C. Tanner Company’s Training
and Publishing Practice.
For more inormation visit carrots.com.