oregon’s methane project - experience and potential
DESCRIPTION
Oregon’s Methane Project - Experience and Potential. Mike Gamroth Oregon State University Dept. of Animal Sciences. The process. Anaerobic digestion – like the rumen Longer retention Methane collection Methane use Heat, hot water Combustion engine electricity. “Methane digester”. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Oregon’s Methane Project -Oregon’s Methane Project -Experience and PotentialExperience and Potential
Mike Gamroth
Oregon State University
Dept. of Animal Sciences
The processThe process
• Anaerobic digestion – like the rumen– Longer retention
• Methane collection
• Methane use– Heat, hot water– Combustion engine electricity
“Methane digester”
Basic conceptsBasic concepts
• Decomposition of organic material
• Oxygen-free environment
• Numerous strains of microorganisms
• Biogas– Methane 50-80%
– CO2 20-50%
– Other gases
• Ambient temperature– Covered lagoon– Lowest output
• Mesophilic– Around 100º F– More forgiving
• Thermophilic– Highest output, lower retention time
Digester typesDigester types• Plug flow
– Suited to scraped manure– Most common on dairies– Long rectangular tanks– Heat added, in-ground or insulated– Retention time (RT) 15 to 20 days
Digester typesDigester types• Complete mix
– Typically upright round tanks– Benefits from regular feeding– Can handle “wetter” manure– When co-digesting, mixing important
Digester typesDigester types• Covered lagoon
– Lowest cost, simplest to operate– Best suited to warm climates, wet manure– Lowest gas output– Often will be “seasonal”
Digester typesDigester types• Biofilm
– Can augment any digester– A place for bacterial activity– Reduces retention time
Economics 101Economics 101• A thrifty digester system can payback
in 7 to 10 years– Initial cost– Operation costs– Value of energy, tax credits– Other benefits – odor control, solids sales
Benefits of digestionBenefits of digestion• Generate energy from biomass• Odor reduction• More readily available nitrogen• Pathogen reduction
$65 $68 $80 $83
Why there aren’t more…Why there aren’t more…
• Poor design
• Lack of skills, time
• Excessive maintenance, operation time
• Diminishing returns over time
• Lack of interest
• Out of business
EPA and Meyer, et al
Keys to successKeys to success• Know your manure quality• Match the digester technology with the
manure• Select a tested design and keep it simple• Take advantage of incentives• Monitor the system daily• Line up operation and maintenance
backup
ResourcesResources
• http://www.epa.gov/agstar/index.html
• Our project:– Energy Trust of Oregon– Oregon Beef Council– Oregon Dairy Farmers Association
• Amanda Green (360) 751-4190 Amanda Green (360) 751-4190
A partnership of Cal-gon Farms A partnership of Cal-gon Farms and Portland General Electricand Portland General Electric
The systemThe system
• Scraped manure• Piston pump to feed
digester• Digester effluent
through a screw-press screen
• Liquids stored in lagoon
• Solids in covered bunker
UsesUses
• Lagoon liquids mixed with water and irrigated onto field corn
• Solids are sold off the farm and used as bedding
• Recycling lagoon liquids through separator when not used for digester
Research projectResearch project
• Questions about the farm’s nutrient balance
• Questions about the start-up and stabilization of the digester
• Received money from a grant program to sample the digester during start-up and for a two month period during operation
• Evaluate solids as a soil amendment
Electrical OutputElectrical Output
Generation Record (based on PGE bills)
Cal-Gon Farms Biogas Project
6603362716778/3/2003
676291961411/27/2002
746312311510/29/2002
59630178869/28/2002
49430148178/29/2002
38432123017/30/2002
2753185275/30/2002
Avg kWh/day# DayskWhEnding Svc Date
Cal-Gon Anaerobic DigesterOrganic Acid Levels
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
1/9
/20
02
1/1
6/2
00
2
1/2
3/2
00
2
1/3
0/2
00
2
2/6
/20
02
2/1
3/2
00
2
2/2
0/2
00
2
2/2
7/2
00
2
3/6
/20
02
3/1
3/2
00
2
3/2
0/2
00
2
3/2
7/2
00
2
4/3
/20
02
4/1
0/2
00
2
4/1
7/2
00
2
4/2
4/2
00
2
5/1
/20
02
5/8
/20
02
5/1
5/2
00
2
Sample Dates
(mg
/L)
Acetic Acid
Butyric Acid
Propionic Acid
Basic resultsBasic results
Lb. / 1000 gallons
DM % N P K CFU/100 ml E. coli
Raw manure 13.0 43 6 26 59 mill.
Digester effluent 4.6 27 4 19 1.2 mill.
Solids 26.4 6.3/t 2.4/t 3.7/t
Exporting solids to reduce nutrient loadingExporting solids to reduce nutrient loading
Lb./cow-year (3.5 ton/cow)
N P K
Avg. separated solids1 17.1 3.0 6.5
Bernie’s separated
solids
22.4 8.4 13
Bernie’s lagoon solids 31.1 14.6 9.4
1 Average of 51 separators, Willamette Valley, 1995
Solids plotsSolids plots
DAF separation
TS TSS
Raw 1.9
Sludge 3.3
Effluent 0.4 0.05
90%+ P removal