organisational direction : planning process

33

Upload: midul-kasim

Post on 22-Jul-2015

79 views

Category:

Leadership & Management


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Organisational Direction : Planning process
Page 2: Organisational Direction : Planning process

“An organization comprise of 2 or more

persons engaged in a systematic and

co - ordinate effort , persistently over a

period of time, in pursuit of goals which

convert resources into goods or services

which are needed by the consumers”

Composed of individuals and groups

Exist in order to try to achieve certain goals

Involves specialisation, & require rational co-ordination & control

Some degree of permanence

Page 3: Organisational Direction : Planning process

A mission is basically the purpose of a Company,organisation or person.

It is the basic purpose of the existence of anything.

A written declaration of an organizations core purpose and focus that normally remains unchanged over time

“It provides the framework or

context within which the

companies strategies are

formulated”

Page 4: Organisational Direction : Planning process

The mission statement should be a clear and succinct representation of the enterprise`s purpose for existence

Mission statement represents the broadest perspective of enterprises mission

The mission statement encapsulates the vision of what the organisation is, or intends to become

It should be flexible enough to accommodate change, although mission statements rarely change frequently.

“ A better world through kindness to animals.”

-Best friends animal society

“ To inspire lifelong learning, advance knowledge, and strengthen our communities.”

-New York public library

“To bring inspiration and innovation

to every athlete in the world”

- Nike

Page 5: Organisational Direction : Planning process

Whole of the main idea, corporate purpose and drivers

behind a corporation.

Mission statements take considerable time and effort

to prepare, particularly because they are likely to

remain in place for the long term.

What ?

Page 6: Organisational Direction : Planning process

Set up a project team.

Carry out an attitude survey throughout the organisation, to check the validity and usefulness of the current mission statement.

A revised mission statement can then be drafted, and sent for consultation to representatives of the workforce and a selection of customers. Further comments

This process of involvement must be communicated throughout the company in an appropriate way. Newsletters, workshops or meetings are commonly used

Finally it is important to monitor and review the process to ensure that the mission remains relevant and supported, and takes into account stakeholder views.

How ?

Page 7: Organisational Direction : Planning process

It is a desired result that a person or a system envisions, plans and commits to achieve.

Many people endeavor to reach goals within a finite time by setting deadlines

Goals are frequently used to give substance to the mission statement and may be included as part of it or alongside it

“To be the first choice for business management education worldwide.”

-ABE

Page 8: Organisational Direction : Planning process

Mission

•A mission may be narrow or broad in scope.

Goal

•Open ended statements, typically not quantified or given time limits

Strategy

•A plan of action designed to achieve a long-term or overall aim.

Objectives

•Expression of agreed strategy in terms of exactly what is to be accomplished & by when

Tactical plans

•To draw up tactical plans which set out the major steps necessary to achieve the tactical objectives

Operational plan

•This means that they are aimed at achieving a specific objective which, once reached, is not likely to recur in the future

Performance

•Each individual or team works to achieve their objectives through implementation of the plans

Page 9: Organisational Direction : Planning process

Different views

Rational approach

It is the systematic step by step method in “Hard” (quantitative data) obtained through observation or mathematical (statistical) analysis or modeling is used for making long term decisions.

The rational approach to planning which has been described in this section has been criticised by different management theorists on the grounds that when applied in practice to organisations, it can stifle creative thinking, and that it is not an accurate

Page 10: Organisational Direction : Planning process

The growing professionalism of the planner's job, with a consequent reduction in the

involvement of line managers in the planning process and hence in their commitments

to its outcomes.

An over-emphasis on quantification, resulting in important qualitative information,

such as emerging societal values or new directions in technology, getting lost in the

process, thereby biasing the scope and character of the information used to plan.

Requirements of administrative efficiency, such as the introduction of standardised

data inputs and planning documents, making the planning process more routine and

less open to a wide range of information or fresh insight into emerging strategic issues.

Misapplication of analytical techniques constraining management thinking, so that

emerging strategic issues which may later prove decisive are not identified because they

do not fall within the scope of the model or complex problems become over-

simplified.

Page 11: Organisational Direction : Planning process

Instead of applying highly formalised methods to long-term

planning, managers use instead a mixture of formal analysis,

behavioural techniques and power politics

Then Move forward in incremental steps towards their ultimate

objectives, constantly checking and refining their actions in the

light of incoming information.

Checking and refining their actions in the light of incoming

information. Thus, starting out with a plan which is not fully

detailed, management tries out its application and waits for

responses and criticism from others in order to modify and

refine it.

Page 12: Organisational Direction : Planning process

The thinking behind this view is that rational behaviour can stifle creativity and that in solving problems there is room for both types of behaviour.

Those who are able to visualise future change have much to offer to an organisation's strategic management.

strategic management. Such a method provides a general direction for the organisation to take, rather than a totally planned approach, so it can be readily adapted to cope with changes in the environment.

It is even possible for the 'vision' to be changed, since it is the brainchild of one person and does not need to be reconsidered through a complex layer of committees.

Page 13: Organisational Direction : Planning process

This approach considers that strategy evolves from

a number of actions by different decision-makers.

The main difference between this and other

approaches described above is that its the result of

actions rather than of a collective intention to

pursue a particular goal.

Page 14: Organisational Direction : Planning process

Objectives are quantified statements of what the

organisation intends to achieve.

They should focus the mission of the organisation

onto specific targets which direct the activities of the

organisation, and can also be used for measuring

performance.

Objectives should set out exactly what is being aimed

for and, wherever possible, they should be quantified

Page 15: Organisational Direction : Planning process

Objectives should set out exactly what is being aimed for

and, wherever possible, they should be quantified. Their desirable

characteristics are often represented through the acronym `SMART`.

S – Specific

The objective states quite clearly what is to be achieved.

An objective has to be unambiguous; otherwise it will cause

confusion and be open to misrepresentation

In contemporary organisations two other Ss are desirable:

objectives should be significant and stretching.

The stretching factor is to ensure that some areas of the tasks

will need additional effort, since an objective should not be so

easy so as to demotivate an individual

Page 16: Organisational Direction : Planning process

M – Measurable

Objectives are either quantifiable or qualitative.

Objectives are either quantifiable or qualitative.

So that those who are fulfilling the tasks know exactly what is

required of them

And also person(s) measuring their efficiency and effectiveness

will know what the measurement outcomes are in practical

terms.

Meaningful and motivational should also be included as

desirable Ms, because of their relevance to the self-worth of the

individual

Page 17: Organisational Direction : Planning process

A – Achievable

Objectives should always be achievable, with training and

support given by the immediate manager where required.

In setting individual objectives as part of the organisational

performance management and feedback process, objectives

should be jointly set by the member of staff and his or her

manager.

So acceptable objectives are more likely to be achieved, as the

individual will have been part of the decision-making process

regarding the outcomes of their job role

All objectives must be action-orientated: that is, there must be

outcomes measurable either quantitatively or qualitatively.

Page 18: Organisational Direction : Planning process

R – Realistic

The targets/aims/objectives must be realistic, which is aligned

to them being achievable.

achievable. They must be relevant to the job role, reasonable,

reviewable and rewarding.

. Rewarding in this sense here does not necessarily refer to

monetary rewards but intrinsic in that the individual's job

satisfaction and worth (self-esteem), is also recognised.

Kanter believes that there are 50 ways to reward individuals, one

of which is money and the other 49 recognition for a job well

done and personal commendations and public

acknowledgement of the individual's achievements.

Page 19: Organisational Direction : Planning process

T – Timed

A definite date must be decided upon by which the objectives have to be achieved, which means they have to be time-based.

It is appropriate too that they are timely in so far as the time set for achievement of the objective must be in line with other objectives of the team.

Objectives of the team (or the entire workforce). Objectives should be tangible, in that they can be assessed and are meaningful to the organisation and to the individual.

Trackable objectives are vital: monitoring and review must take place on a regular basis and, where necessary, remedial action taken.

It might well be that either the internal or external environment has made an impact on the objectives, in which case they should either be rewritten or amended to meet the new circumstances.

Page 20: Organisational Direction : Planning process

Quantitative objectives are

those in which outcomes are expressed in terms of

numbers, relating to money, percentages, periods

of time, output figures, etc. Examples are:

'To achieve 5% year-on-year growth in profit after tax for

the next five years.‘

'To achieve 15% return on investment in the next tax year.‘

Page 21: Organisational Direction : Planning process

Qualitative objectives can relate to service levels to be achieved, image, position, ethics, or learning and development.

some of the main examples will be ;

“To be the leading innovative company within 5 years”

“serve the whole world within 2 years”

Page 22: Organisational Direction : Planning process

Corporate objectives

Unit / Divisional objectives

Departmental objectives

Individual / Team objectives

Page 23: Organisational Direction : Planning process

They are those which are associated with the

overall direction of the organisation. Thus they develop the

organisation's mission in relation to the key areas

Profitability

Market share

Cash flow

Growth

Customer satisfaction

Industrial relations

Added value

The product and/or service.

Page 24: Organisational Direction : Planning process

Unit or divisional objectives translate the overall

objectives of the organisation into objectives for specific units

or divisions of the organisation, according to that division or

unit's areas of responsibility or function. They are then broken

down into

Departmental objectives

Individual / Team objectives

Page 25: Organisational Direction : Planning process

• This is where top management sets the objectives for the whole organisation and passes them down to lower levels of management to see that they are adopted and achieved

• It is claimed that this approach ensures greater co-ordination of objectives and structural fit within the hierarchy. However, it tends to be inflexible and authoritarian,

Top down objective

setting

• This allows greater autonomy to the lower levels of the hierarchy. Staff are consulted and agree with management the objectives which they themselves see as necessary to achieve the overall goals.

• This approach is claimed to be more flexible and allows for flows of information and ideas to be drawn up from all levels of the organisation.

Bottom up objective

setting

Page 26: Organisational Direction : Planning process

Some objectives may be more important than others or may be achieved only at the expense of others.

Objectives can be set for the short term or long term; and even if the overall aim is still consistent, there may well be conflict between long-term and short-term objectives.

Main 4 way through which these are dealing are

Satisficing

Priority setting

Sequential attention

Barganing

Page 27: Organisational Direction : Planning process

SatisficingIt is the term used to describe where an organisation compromises

to some extent on the degree to which an objective is met.

Priority setting

It is where objectives are ranked in order of priority and efforts concentrated on achieving each objective in order of priority.

Sequential attentionIt involves dealing with individual objectives

before moving on to another. Unlike priority setting, however, sequential attention does not attempt to rank objectives, but gives attention to each as if in sequence.

Bargaining

It is probably the most common form of dealing with conflicts. Individual managers will negotiate or co-operate with other managers to achieve their own objectives.

Page 28: Organisational Direction : Planning process

The term 'stakeholder' can be used to describe any individual or

group which has an interest (not necessarily financial) in the

future of the organisation.

Each of the stakeholders will have different expectations of an

organisation.

The stakeholder approach recognises that businesses can make

strategic gains from recognising stakeholder interests and

responding to them through the strategic management process.

Trying to reconcile these different expectations in order to set

agreed objectives for the organisation.

Page 29: Organisational Direction : Planning process
Page 30: Organisational Direction : Planning process

The tools of scanning and trend analysis are useful in

environments which are relatively stable, and forecasts of the

future can be based on what has happened in the past.

The basic approach of scenario planning is to identify existing

trends and key uncertainties and then combine them in a

number of scenarios that are internally consistent and within

the realm of the possible.

Consistent and within the realm of the possible. The purpose

of the scenarios is not to cover all future eventualities, but to

identify the boundaries of future outcomes.

Page 31: Organisational Direction : Planning process
Page 32: Organisational Direction : Planning process
Page 33: Organisational Direction : Planning process