organisational readiness self assessment (orsa) analysis 2012/13 submissions – area teams...
TRANSCRIPT
Organisational Readiness Self Assessment (ORSA)Analysis 2012/13 submissions – Area Teams
Revalidation Forum
18th September 2013
NHS | Presentation to [XXXX Company] | [Type Date]1
Section 2 – Responsible OfficerORSA submissions show that….
•All responsible officers are nominated and trained
•Second responsible officers are nominated where applicable
•All area teams have local and regional support
•One area team highlighted that funding and resource were insufficient
Section 3 - AppraisalORSA submissions show that….
•All area teams have an appraisal policy
•8 area teams completed an audit to determine reasons for all missed or incomplete appraisals
•All area teams reported they have sufficient medical appraisers, appraisers are supported in their role and receive feedback
Section 4 – Organisational Governance• All area teams reported they:
• have a governance structure or strategy is in place which is subject to external or independent review
• have a system for monitoring the fitness to practise of their doctors• have processes for doctors to obtain structured feedback from patients and
colleagues• have a process to ensure key items of information are included and discussed in the
appraisal portfolio• have a process for obtaining relevant information when entering into a contract of
employment • have a process in place to ensure fitness to practise evaluations and appraisals take
account whole scope of practice• have a process established for the investigation of capability, conduct, health and
fitness to practise concerns• monitor compliance with GMC conditions or undertakings• relevant appraisal, revalidation and human resources policies are fair and non-
discriminatory
Section 4 – Organisational Governance• 8 area teams have a policy (with core content) for re-skilling,
rehabilitation, remediation
• 8 area teams have a description of the support available for doctors to keep their knowledge and skills up to date
• In terms of clinical audit activity in line with national guidance
• 5 area teams reported Yes
• 3 area teams reported N/A
• 1 area teams reported No