organization of american states - report on the situation …scm.oas.org/pdfs/2008/cp20174e.pdf ·...
TRANSCRIPT
March 2008
REPORT ON THE SITUATION OF
INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION
TECHNOLOGIES (ICT) IN THE
AMERICAS REGION
Inter-American Telecommunication Commission
Organization of American States
2
CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION TO AND OBJECTIVES OF THIS DOCUMENT......................................... 6 2. SITUATION OF ICTs IN THE AMERICAS ..................................................................... 6
2.1. Fixed service networks .........................................................................................8 2.2. Mobile and third generation networks .....................................................................9 2.3. Internet infrastructure........................................................................................ 13 2.3.1. Internet access and broadband............................................................................ 13 2.3.2. Computers ....................................................................................................... 15 2.3.3. Servers (hosts) ................................................................................................. 16 2.3.4. Internet domain names/addresses ....................................................................... 16 2.4. Alternative networks and technologies.................................................................. 19 2.4.1. Satellite systems ............................................................................................... 20 2.4.2. WiMAX Technology for broadband ........................................................................ 20 2.4.3. Digital terrestrial television (DTT) ........................................................................ 21 2.4.4. Cellular telephony for rural fixed solutions............................................................. 22 2.4.5. Wi-Fi to expand Internet coverage ....................................................................... 22 2.4.6. Broadband voice over IP..................................................................................... 23
3. PROSPECTS FOR ICTs IN THE 2007-2012 PERIOD.................................................... 24 3.1. International Telecommunication Union “Measuring the Information Society” ............. 24 3.1.1. Application of the conceptual model: the indicators................................................ 26 3.1.2. Results of the 2007 ICT Opportunity Index............................................................ 28 3.1.3. ICT-OI and the digital divide ............................................................................... 30 3.1.4. ITU 2007 ICT-OI Assessments............................................................................. 32
4. MARKET STRUCTURE............................................................................................ 33 4.1. Regulatory framework........................................................................................ 34 4.1.1. Financial aspects of access to telecommunications.................................................. 34 4.1.2. Investment in ICTs ............................................................................................ 38 4.1.3. Revenue of ICTs, prices of telecommunication services, price trends ......................... 40
5. CHALLENGES OF ICT SECTOR TRENDS ................................................................... 41 5.1. Digital broadcasting services ............................................................................... 41 5.2. Implementation of IP telephony........................................................................... 42 5.3. Universal Service/Access .................................................................................... 45 5.3.1. Telecenters (public access centers) ...................................................................... 53 5.4. Accessibility and access to information and communication via information and
communication technologies (ICTs) ............................................................................... 58 6. ICT APPLICATIONS............................................................................................... 61
6.1. Telehealth ........................................................................................................ 61 6.2. Cyber government ............................................................................................ 65 6.3. E-learning ........................................................................................................ 67 6.4. Cybersecurity.................................................................................................... 69
7. CONNECTIVITY PROJECTS IN THE REGION.............................................................. 71 7.1. Connectivity projects of OAS in the Americas ........................................................ 71 7.1.1. Regional project to bridge the digital divide and incorporate populations in the IS ....... 71 7.1.2. Project to establish the ICT Application Research and Development Center ................ 72 7.2. Plan of Action eLAC 2007 and eLAC2010 ............................................................... 74
8. STRATEGIES TO INCREASE CONNECTIVITY AND TELECOMMUNICATION DEVELOPMENT78 9. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................... 80 BIBLIOGRAPHY......................................................................................................................... 82
3
ACRONYMS.............................................................................................................................. 83 ANNEXES ................................................................................................................................ 84
ANNEX 1: Table of World Indicators ............................................................................. 84 ANNEX 2: OAS Connectivity projects for the Americas .................................................... 86 ANNEX 3: OAS Member States .................................................................................... 92 ANNEX 4: Links of Interest .................................................................................... 93
4
FIGURES
Main telephone lines in the OAS countries (2006)...................................................9 Total number of cellular and fixed telephones in the OAS Member States (per 100
inhabitants) .............................................................................................. 10 Cellular subscribers in 2006 (per 100 inhabitants) ................................................ 11 Cellular subscribers in OAS countries (2006) compared. Total: 554 million ............. 12 Internet and broadband in the OAS countries....................................................... 13 Presence of computers in households and Internet access in CITEL ......................... 14 Internet users (estimated) in the Americas per year ............................................. 14 Broadband subscribers in the Americas in 2006: 80.2 million ................................ 15 Computers per 100 inhabitants in OAS countries .................................................. 16 Distribution of IPv4 addresses per organization in April 2007 ................................. 17 Number of Internet resources assigned in Latin American and the Caribbean............ 17 Distribution of IP addresses by country ............................................................... 18 Distribution of IPv4 blocs each year by country .................................................... 18 IPv4 address allocations ................................................................................... 19 IPv6 initial allocations issued............................................................................. 19 Diagram of the conceptual model....................................................................... 26 ICT Opportunity Index with averages.................................................................. 30 Percentage of countries by region that authorize and regulate VoIP (2004) .............. 44 International switched and VoIP traffic, by region of destination, 2004 .................... 45 Growth in global VoIP traffic.............................................................................. 45 Content of Ministry of Health websites in 2006..................................................... 65 RedCLARA topology map (April 2007)................................................................. 69 Framework of action of the project..................................................................... 73 Distribution of 1,541 ICT projects registered with PROTIC.org, by eLAC 2007 thematic
area......................................................................................................... 76 Comparison of the main international indicators in CITEL countries ......................... 84
5
TABLES
OAS countries with the largest number of cellular subscribers in 2006..................... 11 OAS countries with 3G technology presence ........................................................ 12 Main OAS countries with broadband subscribers as of 2006 ................................... 15 The main countries of Latin America and the Caribbean with WiMAX technology........ 20 ICT-OI for OAS countries in the 2001-2005 period, values and rankings (2005) ........ 29 Regulatory aspects and competition in OAS countries ........................................... 34 Percentages of disbursements of Funds in OAS countries....................................... 35 Principal sources of the Funds of the OAS countries in 2005................................... 36 Strategies for the funding of Universal Service in Latin America.............................. 38 Expenditure on ICTs as a percentage of GDP in OAS countries in 2005 .................... 39 Priority of governments of the OAS countries for the ICT sector in 2005 .................. 40 Countries that have adopted DTT standards in the region ...................................... 41 Regulatory aspects for telephony ....................................................................... 42 Application of universal access funds in 2005 in OAS countries ............................... 47 Rural population as a percentage of total population in the countries of the Americas
(2005) ..................................................................................................... 51 Average number of potential users per public ICT access center ............................. 53 Total number of PIACs (governmental and private) identified ................................. 55 Estimated number of inhabitants potentially served by PIACs and estimated population
without ICT access..................................................................................... 55 Virtual libraries on health in 2006 ...................................................................... 64 Adoption of telehealth policies in OAS countries in 2005 ........................................ 64 E-government readiness rankings of CITEL countries in 2005................................. 66 ICT learning centers in CITEL ............................................................................ 68 Progress with eLAC 2007 .................................................................................. 75
6
REPORT ON THE SITUATION OF INFORMATION AND
COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES (ICT) IN THE
AMERICAS REGION
1. INTRODUCTION TO AND OBJECTIVES OF THIS DOCUMENT
At its thirty-seventh regular session, the OAS General Assembly gave the Inter-American
Telecommunication Commission (CITEL) and, in particular, the telecommunication sector, a unique
opportunity to create a succinct and readily understood document presenting the current situation
of and progress made with connectivity, challenges it faces, and possible approaches to meeting
them.
This report will examine the challenges faced by governments of the region in improving
connectivity and access in the process of integration to the Information Society (IS).1 It will also
include a series of scenarios describing how the market could be developed in the future.
A three-step approach was taken: a review of background and related information, compilation of
information from Administrations on connectivity, and concrete proposals about how to improve the
status of information and communication technologies (ICTs) to reduce the digital divde in the
countries in the framework of CITEL.
The statistics presented herein are obtained directly from specialized international organizations to
avoid duplicating efforts. The most up-to-date and consistent data possible have been sought when
drawing up the present report.
2. SITUATION OF ICTS IN THE AMERICAS
Telecommunication infrastructure is constantly evolving. The technology has moved from a system
in which most revenue was generated from long-term investments in voice services, which were
evolving slowly and provided over fixed lines, to a system where, in the future, the source of
revenue will primarily be telecommunication services and applications that utilize the Internet
protocol (IP) based mobile technologies.
At the same time, an impressive transformation of the sector’s organization has taken place, since,
as a result of the convergence of networks and services, operators formerly specializing in specific
communications segments are being strengthened in their original sphere and are making
incursions into others. Local telephony, even where maintained, for the most part in countries with
monopolistic control, now faces competition from mobile telephony, cable television operators, and
even electricity companies, which are considering the possibility of utilizing their networks for
communications.
1 Defined as economic and societal networks that exchange information using digital technologies
(networks and ICTs) (ECLAC, 2003).
7
Technological convergence and the new technologies are affording the sector new opportunities.
However, their implementation may pose a major challenge for some developing economies owing
to their limited telecommunication infrastructure which, in turn, widens the gap between “the
haves” and the “have nots” in terms of access to the opportunities afforded by information and
communications technologies (ICTs).2
Statistics show that in recent years, the digital divide between the developed and the developing
countries has grown smaller, although the degree varies with the type of technology considered and
the country’s economic situation. However, much remains to be done compared to developed
countries, and also at the national level. Factors affecting the digital divide are the public’s lack of
financial resources, limited investment in information and communications infrastructure (an aspect
where there is great disparity between urban and rural areas), difficult geographical conditions,
regulatory problems, low educational level of the population, low levels of training in ICT use, socio-
cultural or language aspects, and lack of electricity.3 In particular, with the numerous new
technologies that are emerging, there is concern that the problem of unequal distribution of access
to information and communications technologies will grow more acute worldwide.
The most important coordination of ICT initiatives was effected at the World Summit on the
Information Society (WSIS)4, an initiative organized by the International Telecommunication Union
(ITU), whose objective was to eliminate the worldwide digital divide in access to ICTs, specifically
telecommunications and the Internet, and to prepare action plans and policies to reduce this
inequality.
Participants were national governments, the private sector, civil society organizations, the United
Nations, and its specialized agencies.
The Summit comprised two phases:
1. The first on December 10 to 12, 2003 in Geneva, Switzerland. The Declaration of Principles
and Plan of Action were outcomes of this phase.
2. The second on November 16 to 18, 2005 in Tunis. The Tunis Commitment and Tunis
Agenda for the Information Society were its outcomes.
In parallel, the most recent political declarations on ICT use have also made proposals, but most
have not materialized as projects. The most important activities were:
• ECLAC: Florianopolis Declaration (July 2000)
• Itacurucá Declaration (October 2000)
• The Rio Group’s Proposal for Latin America’s integration into the Information Society (March
2001)
2 CITEL, IV Meeting of the Assembly of CITEL: Declaration of San José (February 2006) 3 ECLAC Report: “Public policies for the development of information societies in Latin America and
the Caribbean” 4 http://www.itu.int/wsis/index-es.html
8
• Regional Ministerial Conference of Latin America and the Caribbean in Preparation for the
Second Phase of the World Summit onthe Information Society: Rio de Janeiro Declaration
on ICTs for Development (June 2001)
• OAS/CITEL: Agenda for Connectivity in the Americas and Plan of Action of Quito (August
2002)
• First Meeting of the Latin American and Caribbean Regional Network (LACNET) of the United
Nations ICT Task Force (February 2003)
• Bávaro Declaration (January 2003)
• Declaration of Rio de Janeiro (2005)
• ECLAC: Regional Action Plan to strengthen the Information Society eLAC 2007 and eLAC-
2010.
2.1. Fixed service networks
It is important to examine telephone density from one country to another in the region. Account
must be taken of the fact that advances with broadband and, hence, the Internet, have partially
depended upon the development achieved with fixed network infrastructure.5
The region’s rate of fixed telephony penetration rose at a sustained pace from 1995 to 2006,
enabling telephone density of 23% to be achieved in 2006.6 This probably was a consequence of
the opening of the least developed countries.
As may be seen in Figure 1, the United States and Canada have over 60% fixed telephony
penetration. To be noted are the cases of Saint Kitts and Nevis and Barbados, where this figure
exceeds 50%.
Haiti, Nicaragua, and Paraguay have the lowest percentages in their respective subregions and are
countries that are benefiting from wireless technologies to extend the telecommunication networks
more rapidly.
5 Although recently there has been a global trend towards wireless broadband solutions, such as
WiMAX, as will be explained below. 6 “Monitoring eLAC2007” ECLAC, 2007, http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/icteye/Default.aspx. ITU, 2006
9
Source: ITU
Figure 1: Main telephone lines in the OAS countries (2006)
2.2. Mobile and third generation networks
Mobile networks are among the ICTs with highest penetration in the region. Even in 2002, mobile
exceeded fixed telephony in various countries of Latin America,7 as may be seen in Figure 2.
Cellular alternatives are starting to meet many of the needs for fixed networks, especially in less
developed countries.
7 According to ECLAC data, by 2005, mobile penetration in Bolivia and Paraguay was already 10
times higher than fixed telephony penetration.
Main telephone lines - 2006
43,54
24,17
41,19
50,14
12,32
7,13
20,54
64,12
20,20 17,00
30,72 29,40
13,07 14,81
60,60
31,75
10,49
14,66
1,70
9,62 12,03
18,33
4,43
13,17
5,25 8,22
9,94
59,26
32,58
19,03 18,03
24,87 28,31
15,49
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
ATGARG BHS BRB BLZ BOL BRA CAN CHL COL CRI DMA ECU SLV USA GRD GTM GUY HTI HND JAM MEX NIC PAN PRY PER DOM KNA LCA VCT SUR TTO URY VEN
Countries
P E R 1 0 0 i n h a t a n t s
10
Source: ITU
Figure 2: Total number of cellular and fixed telephones in the OAS Member States (per 100 inhabitants)
By 2003, cellular telephony in the region’s countries was beginning to catch up with that of the most
developed countries, and its rate of growth was increasing, according to ECLAC y CITEL. See Figure
3: ITU.8
8 See note 6.
Total mobile cellular and fixed telephones per 100 inhabitants in the 2000 – 2006 period
350
550
750
950
1.150
1.350
1.550
1.750
1.950
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Year
Totals
TOTAL CELLULAR TOTAL FIXED
11
Source: ITU
Figure 3: Cellular subscribers in 2006 (per 100 inhabitants)
Brazil and Mexico remain the countries with the largest mobile markets in Latin America and the
Caribbean (LAC), as may be seen in Table 1.
COUNTRY QUANTITY
United States 233 million
Brazil 99.92 million
Mexico 57.02 million
Argentina 31.5 million
Colombia 29.8 million
Source: ITU
Table 1: OAS countries with the largest number of cellular subscribers in 2006
Cellular subscribers - 2006
105,55
80,52
70,50 76,65
43,01
28,85
52,90 52,51
75,62
64,31
32,82
58,68 63,23
55,03
77,40
42,36
55,60
37,47
5,87
30,44
105,78
52,63
32,68
52,46 51,31
29,95
51,05
23,70
65,72 73,64
70,80
126,42
66,83 69,04
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
ATG ARG BHS BRB BLZ BOL BRA CAN CHL COL CRI DMA ECU SLV USA GRD GTM GUY HTI HND JAM MEX NIC PAN PRY PER DOM KNA LCA VCT SUR TTO URY VEN
Countries
per 100 inhabitant
12
Source: ITU
Figure 4: Cellular subscribers in OAS countries (2006) compared. Total: 554 million
Based on ECLAC data,9 Peru and Honduras have the highest mobile rates.
The year with the steepest rise in third-generation (3G) technology in the region has been 2007,
with somewhat conservative efforts, which have given rise to some expectations and which
especially are awaiting low terminal prices. Only 11 operators in the Americas, of the 191 recorded
with 3G UMTS worldwide, have planned or developed these cutting edge wireless networks. See
Table 2.
COUNTRY OPERATOR START DATE
CTI Móvil Nov-07
Telefónica Móviles (Movistar) July-07
Argentina Telecom Personal May-07
Brazil Telemig Celular Nov-07
Canada Rogers Wireless Nov-06
Chile Entel PCS Dec-06
United States AT&T July-04
Paraguay América Móvil - Claro Nov-07
Ancel July-07
Telefónica Móviles / Movistar July-07
Uruguay CTI Móvil / AM Wireless Nov-07
Source: 3G Americas
Table 2: OAS countries with 3G technology presence
Coverage in the region initially tended to be confined to high income areas, such as specific areas of
the capital cities. Only in the United States and Canada has it been extended to wider areas.
In Latin American and the Caribbean, the service that has been most successful is mobile
broadband for portable computer connections, rather than cellular telephony, owing to its high
costs.
9 See note 6.
Mobile subscribers for the year 2006: 554 millones
42%
18% 10%
6%
5%
19% United States
Brazil
Mexico Argentina
Colombia
Others
13
2.3. Internet infrastructure
2.3.1. Internet access and broadband There has been great expansion of the Internet since the mid-1990s, achieving in 2006 penetration
of nearly 23.4 % in the Latin American countries,10 as may be seen in Figure . Compared to
broadband, a large divide may still be noted, since it is one of the most expensive ICT services
compared to prices in developed economies (tariffs remain high).
According to ECLAC data,11 the highest Internet tariffs are found in Honduras, Guatemala, and
Bolivia.
Source: ITU
Figure 5: Internet and broadband in the OAS countries
In Canada and the United States, the level of Internet penetration is very similar to the number of
computers per household, whereas in Latin America and the Caribbean, in 2005, Internet
penetration exceeded that of computers, indicating a trend toward shared use of this technology.
See Figure .
10 See note 6. 11 See note 6.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
ATG ARG BHS BRB BLZ BOL BRA CAN CHL COL CRI DMA ECU SLV USA GRD GTM GUY HTI HND JAM MEX NIC PAN PRY PER DOM KNA LCA VCT SUR TTO URY VEN
Countries
Internet and broadband per 100 inhabitants
Internet users per 100 inhabitants - 2006 Broadband subscribers per 100 inhabitants - 2006
14
Source: ITU
Figure 6: Presence of computers in households and Internet access in CITEL
An examination of Figure shows slow growth in Internet access in the region. Levels of broadband
penetration remain low, although by 2005 and 2006, there had been was a steep rise in broadband
penetration.
Source: ITU
Figure 7: Internet users (estimated) in the Americas per year
The United States, Canada, and Brazil remain the countries with the largest broadband market in
Latin America, as may be seen in Table and Figure .
0
50.000.000
100.000.000
150.000.000
200.000.000
250.000.000
300.000.000
350.000.000
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Year
Number of users
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
ATG ARG BHS BRB BLZ BOL BRA CAN CHL COL CRI DMA ECU SLV USA GRD GTM GUY HTI HND JAM MEX NIC PAN PRY PER DOM KNA LCA VCT SUR TTO URY VEN
Countries
Presence of computer in the household and Internet access, per 100 inhabitants
Computers per 100 inhabitants - 2005 Internet users per 100 inhabitants - 2006
15
COUNTRY QUANTITY
1. United States 58.1 million
2. Canada 7.7 million
3. Brazil 5.9 million
4. Mexico 3.7 million
5. Argentina 1.6 million
Source: ITU
Table 3: Main OAS countries with broadband subscribers as of 2006
Source: ITU
Figure 8: Broadband subscribers in the Americas in 2006: 80.2 million
2.3.2. Computers By 2005, computer penetration was rising steadily in the countries of the region (Figure ), although
Canada and the United States had numbers of computers per 100 inhabitants (87.31 and 76.22) far
above the average for the remaining area of the CITEL region (10.06).
Broadband subscribers in 2006: 80.2 million
United States
Canada
Brazil Mexico
Argentina
Other
16
Source: ITU
Figure 9: Computers per 100 inhabitants in OAS countries
2.3.3. Servers (hosts) One difficulty of compiling these statistics has been that Internet servers may be located anywhere
in the world, not specifically in the countries of origin. For that reason, in 2004, the ITU stopped
calculating this figure. That year, the United States held 68% of servers in the region of the
Americas.
2.3.4. Internet domain names/addresses The region’s two organizations involved in administering these Internet resources are the American
Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN) and the Latin American and Caribbean Internet Addresses
Registry (LACNIC).
ARIN is a nonprofit organization that provides services related to Internet number resources in its
region, which includes Canada, different islands of the Caribbean,12 as well as the United States. Its
headquarters is in Virginia, United States.
LACNIC is the organization that administers Internet Protocol (IP) address spaces, Autonomous
System numbers (ASN), inverse resolution, and other resources for Latin America and the
Caribbean (LAC) on behalf of the Internet community. LACNIC’s headquarters is in Montevideo,
Uruguay.
Figure shows that LACNIC still holds a very low percentage of IP version 4 (IPv4) addresses,
whereas ARIN may approach the world average per organization.
12 In the case of OAS: Antigua and Barbuda, Bahamas, Barbados, Dominica, Granada, Jamaica,
Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucía, and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines.
Computers per 100 inhabitants
302.49330.49 354.11
396.69443.70
485.32
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Year
17
Source: LACNIC
Figure 10: Distribution of IPv4 addresses per organization in April 2007
Translation: Central registry. Special uses. Measured in units of 1/8. 1/8 = 1/256 of total IPv4
addresses.
Use of IPv6 addresses declined in 2006, probably because the tests begun in earlier years continue,
and while awaiting greater implementation worldwide (Figure ).
Source: LACNIC
Figure 11: Number of Internet resources assigned in Latin American and the Caribbean
In allocations of IP addresses, in the region covered by LACNIC, distribution of the use of IP version
6 is fairly uniform; however, for IPv4, Mexico consumes the largest amount these resources. See
Figure 12.
18
Source: LACNIC
Figure 12: Distribution of IP addresses by country
Translation: IPv4 allocations. IPv6 allocations.
With regard to allocation of IPv4 blocs, Brazil and Mexico remain the leaders of the region
administered by LACNIC, as is shown in Figure 13.
Source: LACNIC
Figure 13: Distribution of IPv4 blocs each year by country
19
Figure 14 and Figure 15 show the same cases in ARIN for IPv4 and IPv6, where the pattern of use
per year is also irregular, probably because of the implementation of mechanisms to optimize the
use of these resources and of tests of the new versions
Source: ARIN
Figure 14: IPv4 address allocations
Source: ARIN
Figure 15: IPv6 initial allocations issued
2.4. Alternative networks and technologies This section specifies alternative networks and technologies that might reduce the digital divide,
although it is important to note that, based on Latin American Forum of Telecommunications
Regulatory Bodies (REGULATEL) data13, there are regulatory barriers that have impeded the
development of this type of innovative initiative that might reduce cost and improve access to ICTs
in rural areas.
13 Composed of the regulatories bodies of Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba,
Chile, Dominican Republic Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama,
Paraguay, Peru, Uruguay, and Venezuela.
20
2.4.1. Satellite systems Systems such as very small aperture terminals (VSAT)14 are satellite communication networks that
make it possible to establish links between large numbers of remote stations with small antennas
and a central station. These systems used for data transfer, video signal distribution, and also to
provide telephony services.
Projects to provide universal service with these services, for example in Brazil, Chile, Colombia15,
and Peru have been awarded to operators.
2.4.2. WiMAX Technology for broadband
Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access (WiMAX16) is a standard for wireless data
transmission that provides concurrent accesses in areas of up to 48 km in radius and at speeds of
up to 70 Mbps (in theory), utilizing technology that does not require terminals to have clear line of
sight to base stations (there may be obstacles to communication).
It is generally for fixed use in the region, although the Dominican Republic has mobile pre-standard
versions that it is launching commercially, and in Chile a local wireless telephony concession has
been granted and this would also be exploring this variant.
WiMAX might be the alternative to be used in seeking broadband availability in rural areas, although
terminal prices could be an obstacle.
Country Company Launch Date
Ertach 2005
Argentina Velocom 2005
Telmex 2007
Chile Entel 2006
Orbitel 2006
Colombia Telebucaramanga17 2005
RACSA 2006
Costa Rica ICE 2007
El Salvador CTE Telecom 2007
Paraguay Telecel (marca TIGO) 2005
Telecable 2005
Peru Telmex 2006
ONEMAX 2007
Dominican Republic Wind Telecom 2007
Venezuela Omnivisión 2005
Source: web site Latinwimax.com
Table 4: The main countries of Latin America and the Caribbean with WiMAX technology
14 Very Small Aperture Terminals 15 Has more than 20,000 points operating thanks to the Compartel Program. 16 Footnote only applies to spanish 17 Initially PreWiMAX.
21
2.4.3. Digital terrestrial television (DTT) In the Americas, analog television reaches over 90% of households in most countries. In recent
years, technological updates thereof towards digitization have been proposed and in some case
implemented, which would significantly improve technical image and sound quality, and would
facilitate the inclusion of new applications.
CITEL has been working in the area of digital TV since 2001. In October 2003, it urged the member
States of the Organization of American States (OAS) to implement digital television as rapidly as
local conditions permitted, using a common hemispheric standard.
With Digital Terrestrial Television (DTT), 20 million bits per second can be transferred over each 6
MHz television broadcasting channel. This is equivalent to two High Definition Television (HDTV)
programs18, or multiple Standard Definition (SDTV) programs, per channel. HDTV programs may
not be obtained by terrestrial broadcasting alone, but also by cable and satellite.
Societal benefits of DTT that might satisfy urgent public needs:
1. Access to information by wireless broadband
2. Possibility of an interactive platform on the same television, facilitating the delivery of
Internet content to the public without the need for a computer
3. Interactive educational and telehealth applications
• Educational and literary resources
• Early childhood development services
• Training of teachers, professors, and their assistants
• Lifelong learning for adults
• Diagnostic resources
• Educational games
4. Services for persons with disabilities
5. E-commerce
6. Public and emergency information
• Weather
• Security
• Government communications
Brazil, Canada, Honduras, Mexico, United States, and Uruguay have adopted a DTT standard,
whereas Argentina, Barbados, Bahamas, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador,
El Salvador, Guatemala, Jamaica, Panamá, Peru, and Venezuela are assessing plans and policies for
the introduction of DTT.
DTT broadcasting makes efficient use of electromagnetic spectrum, even increasing the number of
channels that can be broadcast, and making it possible to free up a valuable range of frequencies
(698 MHz to 806 MHz) for other possible innovative wireless services that would promote the
expansion of ICTs in the region, for security and public health applications, mobile communications,
and broadcasting. Additionally, it enables transmitter broadcasting power to be used more
efficiently.
18 All HDTV is digital television, but not all digital television is HDTV.
22
DTT could constitute an effective medium for immediate use in promoting social inclusion across the
region and in reducing the “digital divide,” given that it facilitates ICT access because it makes it
possible to access the world’s large information markets and interact using a television set.
The success of DTT could be impacted by the reduction of receiver and converter prices; widespread
use of DVD burners, which has raised consumer expectations; competitive pressure from promoters
of the standards; the availability of high definition content and of rules favorable to broadcasting
companies; and such models as may be defined for free and paid television.
2.4.4. Cellular telephony for rural fixed solutions Cellular services have moved from being a luxury to a basic necessity, in part as a result of the
decline in terminal prices and the establishment of the prepaid method, which typically offers tariffs
more affordable to the public and the possibility of controlling expenditure, not to mention the
facilities made available through the rapid deployment of wireless technologies compared to cable
networks, especially for rural, semi-urban, and remote areas.
The difficulty for operators would be the economic feasibility of projects, but there are even
initiatives to install public telephones using this cellular technology. Additionally, such extensions of
cellular networks are accompanied by universal service initiatives. Examples of this type of
specialized network are those developed in various countries among which we can point out:
Bolivia, Nicaragua, and Peru.
It must also be borne in mind that SMS text messaging create opportunities for communication at a
lower cost than the cost of a telephone call. In addition, use of the wireless application protocol
(WAP) facilitates Internet browsing from cellular networks.
As a reference, in Colombia, only in the first phase of the Project of Community Rural Telephony of
the Compartel Program the 24.2% of 6.745 points (1.632 points) were implemented as cellular
telephony.
2.4.5. Wi-Fi to expand Internet coverage Wi-Fi wireless network technologies operate based on the family of IEEE 802.11 standards.
Although such networks can transmit data, voice, and video (as well as traditional Internet traffic),
it must not be forgotten that they are data-dedicated networks. They are established as an
alternative to the cellular technologies of Time Division Multiple Access (TDMA), Global System for
Mobile Communications (GSM), Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) or other wireless voice
technologies, since the cost of their use is beyond the reach of most community projects.
Utilizing inexpensive equipment, high speed transmission networks can be built to connect remote
areas, to provide broadband access where there is no other connection, and in this way to connect a
group of persons to the Internet.
Local materials can be utilized to manufacture network components, thus creating reliable links with
a very small budget.
One example of projects using this modality is the Agricultural Information System of the Chancay-
Huaral Valley in Peru, projects of the Chilesincables.org group in Chile, wireless transmission of data
of the state of Mérida, Venezuela, and the Hispanoamerican Health Link (EHAS) in a remote rural
area of Cuzco in Peru.
23
2.4.6. Broadband voice over IP Voice over IP (VoIP) services reduce the cost of telephone calls to the Internet access tariff which,
in general, is lower than conventional switched telephony tariffs. But many countries have not yet
authorized or regulated VoIP calls as a result of the conflict that arises between operators that have
invested to create networks and have rights to transmit this type of traffic and new VoIP service
providers.
Since the elements that control VoIP calls are connected to the IP network, they are inherently
accessible to other information servers (such as mail, web, etc., servers). Since they are mounted
on the same communications infrastructure, interoperabilitry is facilitated. They provide various
services: e-commerce, voice virtual private networks (PABX IP and Centrex, IP call centers, Internet
call centers, multiconferencing and upgrading of telecommuting.
The IP networks, including VoIP, do not provide any broadband guarantee or traffic prioritization in
the network, all the traffic receives a best-effort type of service. The users are at the mercy of each
other and the resulting final quality is highly variable and could, in certain cases, reach acceptable
values. Nevertheless, the technology is constantly evolving (IPv6 and next-generation networks
NGN).
24
3. PROSPECTS FOR ICTS IN THE 2007-2012 PERIOD
A summary of the main prospects for ICTs presented by organizations expert in the subject is
provided below.
3.1. International Telecommunication Union “Measuring the Information Society”
The world is being characterized
increasingly as a global Information
Society, where the importance of
expanding access to information and
communication technologies (ICTs) is
considered essential to economic and
social development. The achievement of
internationally agreed development goals,
including the Millennium Development
Goals (MDGs), by means of ICT access has
been well documented. Different studies
have been able to demonstrate the
positive micro and macroeconomic impact
of investment in ICTs, with particular
benefits in connection with productivity
that appropriate use of information and
communication technologies affords
economies.
ICT policy and strategy play predominant
parts in creating an appropriate
environment to promote the expansion
and use of ICTs. Information and data on
the development and progress of ICTs are
important pillars for policy creation based
on evidence and for those with
responsibility for selecting appropriate
policies. Information and data help to
identify goals, monitor their fulfillment,
and evaluate their progress.
The ITU has always drawn up the report of World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators (WTI), which
provides the most recent statistical information on telecommunication/ICT indicators. This data,
which at present is available up to 2006, describes the growth of telephony network, mobile
communications, tariffing, revenue, and investment, for some 200 economies worldwide.
Several years after the review of the use of ICTs by countries was addressed internationally with
different approaches and methods of study, the ITU has published the ICT Opportunity Index (2007
Case of Guatemala: On the basis of the report of the Internet and ICT Penetration and Adoption Project in Guatemala, Guatemala has a suitable infrastructure to develop the ICT industry and also has an ICT industry in the software sector, which exported US$100 million worth of software in 2006, with a growth rate of over 30% compared to 2005, and growth of the hardware and web services industry was steady. Guatemala’s legislation, which dates back to 1996, is a comparative advantage owing to the State’s limited intrusiveness on the market; this has favored explosive growth of the telecommunication sector, which provides a wide range of options that are being supplied by more than 23 registered telecommunication operators. In December 2007, the Government of Guatemala adopted a National Strategy for Reducing the Digital Divide with the support of the National Competitiveness Program and the National Science and Technology Council (http://www.sit.gob.gt/sit/docs/GUATE_CSM_FINAL.pdf). The projects Technology for Education (recycling computers for public schools), Schools of the Future, and Computers for Teachers (60,000 teachers out of the current 85,000 purchased personal computers at a low price during 2007) and others implemented by the Ministry of Education set milestones that have enabled the qualitative leap that the sector required. The establishment of the National Committee to Reduce the Digital Divide, the Cybersecurity Event Response Equipment, the Guatemala Space Agency, the Technology Cluster and others have supported achievement of the Millennium Goals, the Plan of Action of Tunis, and the goals set in the framework of e-LAC2007.
25
ICT-OI)19 based on 10 carefully selected indicators and which combines multiple factors in a single
total value, for the purpose of harmonizing the efforts made and to draw up more effective
agreements and understandings, inherent to a common language.
The ICT-OI is the result of merging two well-known initiatives, ITU’s Digital Access Index (DAI) and
the conceptual framework and model of Orbicom: Monitoring the Digital Divide/Inféstate. The ICT-
OI was recognized by the WSIS and is an excellent example of a successful cooperation and
international partnership. Apart from international comparisons, the methodology of the Index
highlights the relative movements of countries and shows to what extent and how quickly each
country that is listed is progressing. The Consumer Price Index (CPI), for example, has been used
to analyze inflationary trends and provides important input for wage and salary adjustments for
companies.
A composite index such as the ICT-OI is particularly useful in making comparisons within a specific
time period and between countries of similar income levels, or with similar social, regional, or
geographic characteristics. Since the ICT-OI is composed of a number of indicators, which are
grouped into four subindices, it is possible to gain awareness of weaknesses and strengths in
different areas and then to address them appropriately.
According to the ITU, the sole criterion for not including a country in the ICT-OI is lack of data on
the country for several of the indicators utilized to calculate this index.
While a single index undeniably has advantages, presentation of a large amount of information in a
single composite index value also has limitations. Other defects may be estimated values and a
limited number of indicators. Therefore, while indices provide a useful tool for making comparisons,
they should be used wisely with regard to drawing excessively simplistic conclusions.
Conceptual framework of the ICT Opportunitied Index
This conceptual framework is based on each economy’s socioeconomic, geopolitical, cultural
environment and is composed of underlying variables that define the concept of ICT opportunity.
Opportunities for ICTs depend on the degree of info-density and info-use of ICT resources in each
economy.
Info-density means the economy’s productive skills and capacity in terms of ICT labor force and ICT
capital. The quality and quantity of these two inputs are factors essential to growth and economic
development. ICT capital is composed of ICT network infrastructure as well as ICT network
machinery and equipment. ICT labor force is the total sum of ICT skills of an economy’s labor force.
Info-use means an economy’s consumption (or use) of ICTs within a given period. Since the
components of ICTs are a prior requirement to use the services offered, a distinction is made
between “appropriation” of ICTs and intensity of ICT use.
It should be noted that both subindices, info-density and info-use, may continue to grow and
expand with ICT capital or labor force, and with new ICTs introduced over time. This also implies
that ICT Opportunities have no upper limit.
19 ITU’s Measuring the Information Society 2007, 2007 ICT Opportunity Index
http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/ict/publications/ict-oi/2007/index.html
26
3.1.1. Application of the conceptual model: the indicators
The model is based on two subindices, info-density and info-use. The first has as components ICT
capital (network infrastructure) and ICT skills; the second, appropriation of ICTs and intensity of ICT
use.
Source: ITU
Figure 16: Diagram of the conceptual model
Translation: ITU 2007 ICT-OI. Subindex. Info-density. Subindex. Info-use. Sub-index.
Networks. Subindex. Skills – country. Subindex. Appropriation. Subindex. Intensity. Telephone
lines per 100 inhabitants. Cellular subscribers per 100 inhabitants. International Internet bandwidth
(kbps per inhabitant). Adult literacy. Ongoing evaluation (primary, secondary, tertiary, according
to UNESCO). Internet users per 100 inhabitants. Percentage of households with TV. Computers
per 100 inhabitants. All broadband Internet subscribers per 100 inhabitants. Outgoing per capita
international telephone traffic (minutes).
Info-density
The extent of network and infrastructure development was measured with indicators of fixed
telephony line penetration (per 100 inhabitants), mobile cellular subscribers (per 100 inhabitants),
and international Internet bandwidth (Kbps per inhabitant).
Both fixed telephone lines and of mobile subscribers are widely recognized as major indicators to
measure a country’s telecommunication/ICT infrastructure base. The bandwidth indicator also
27
involves investment in infrastructure and facilities for rapid and efficient voice and data transmission
around the world.
While dissemination of ICT and appropriation thereof are realities clearly impacted by societal and
educational factors, indicators of public participation in primary, secondary, and tertiary education
were taken as an inclusive projection of better productive and societal opportunities for ICT
penetration.
Together, educational participation and literacy figures constitute the best indicators available to
reflect the extent to which the development of “knowledge” in turn enhances understanding of ICT
elements and services which, in consequence, have impact on access to and use of ICTs.
The information provided by UNESCO indicates participation in the primary, secondary, and tertiary
segments of countries’ educational systems.
Info-use
To measure ICT appropriation (parameters related to the use and consumption of ICT elements and
services), three popular and widely available ITU indicators were used: Internet users, computers
per 100 inhabitants, and percentage of households with television sets.
Although this last indicator (households with TV) is not very significant for developed countries,
where penetration rates approach 100% in most cases, it remains an important indicator for
developing countries.
Ideally, other indicators of household ICT use could have been included. However, since only a
limited number of countries compile data on household ICT use, account was taken of such
limitations.
Although not all countries in the world have marketed broadband services, the ICT Opportunity
Index includes as one of its indicators the number of broadband subscribers (per 100 inhabitants).
Broadband appropriation is relevant since it is highly correlated with intensity of use.
The choice of indicator also reflects the importance attached to the dissemination of broadband
technologies, especially since many important applications (distance learning, telehealth,
government online) in the area of ICTs for development are related to broadband appropriation.
Although two indicators were chosen to measure ICT intensity (total number of broadband Internet
subscribers per 100 inhabitant and outgoing per capita international telephone traffic (minutes)),
these indicators are limited and provide only a partial view of the intensity of ICT use, mainly as a
result of data limitations.
Data quality
An important criterion in choosing indicators to comprise the ICT Opportunity Index is the
availability and quality of data. The ICT Opportunity Index comprises a total of 10,980 pieces of
reference data: five years (2001-2005), 183 countries, and 10 indicators. Although most of the
data was provided directly by the countries, there are some considerations regarding the quality
and availability of some data. For example, in some cases, the data was derived from estimates or
projections.
28
In particular, excluded from this study (2007 ICT-OI) were those countries that did not supply three
or more figures, for the five years, for the “telephone lines” and “cellular subscribers” indicators.
Reference year and reference country
For effective monitoring of the digital divide, a reference year and reference country must be
defined. As reference country, the average of all countries in each ICT Opportunity Index
component was utilized. The reference year for the 2007 ICT Opportunity Index is 2001, for which
the most data is available. This promotes optimal measurements.
The reference year, 2001, provides an important standard of comparison for systematic
quantification and monitoring of trends in the ICT Opportunity Index among countries and within a
given time period. It is also important for the digital divide to be monitored.
The reference country (the average) has a value of 100 for the reference year throughout the
exercise – for each indicator, each component, and the overall level of the ICT Opportunity Index.
3.1.2. Results of the 2007 ICT Opportunity Index
Now that the scope is known of the ICT Opportunity Index (ICT-OI) published by the ITU in January
2007, covering 183 economies worldwide, we analyze that index here, but for the CITEL Member
States included in said ITU study,20 a total of 30.
Groups within the 2007 ICT Opportunity Index (ICT-OI)
For analytical purposes, the 30 CITEL economies covered may be divided into four categories, based
on their historical information. These categories are based on the results of the most recent data
available (2005). The basis used for categorization is the index’s reference country (average
value), which has the value of 146.25 of the ICT-OI (values of the 2007 ICT-OI for CITEL range
from a minimum of 40.92 (Haiti) to a maximum of 337.16 (Canada)). The eight economies that are
above the average were subdivided into two categories: High and Upper, with four economies in
the High and four economies in the Upper category. The same was done for all economies that
were below the average: the 22 economies below the average were subdivided into two categories,
middle and lower, each having an equal number of countries:. This division into four categories also
provides another perspective for analysis of the digital divide over the years.
High (ICT-OI values of 244 and above): The four economies in the category have achieved a high
level of access to, and use of, ICTs.
20 According to the ITU, the only reason why an economy was not included in the 2007 ICT-OI was
lack of data for three or more years, from 2001 to 2005.
29
2005 2005
ECONOMY 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
RANK
CITEL Rank
Canada 252.19 265.54 297.63 325.75 337.16 1 11
United States 224.63 250.80 276.47 305.67 323.85 2 13
Barbados 126.77 138.26 221.50 249.92 264.85 3 25
Antigua & Barbuda 127.06 132.07 158.22 190.37 244.92 4 31
HIGH AVERAGE 182.66 196.67 238.46 267.93 292.70
Bahamas 140.45 152.01 163.62 175.05 184.13 5 43
Jamaica 82.82 112.05 117.89 128.61 165.16 6 47
Chile 115.78 128.58 141.73 154.14 157.65 7 50
Grenada 102.89 124.66 149.25 152.15 156.79 8 51
UPPER AVERAGE 110.49 129.33 143.12 152.49 165.93
Reference Country 100.00 109.41 121.18 133.41 146.25
Uruguay 104.10 105.06 108.21 123.52 143.31 9 59
Argentina 101.84 103.57 111.17 126.98 140.40 10 60
Brazil 87.22 97.14 104.41 122.56 136.44 11 64
Costa Rica 93.30 105.83 117.23 123.92 130.58 12 66
Trinidad & Tobago 93.72 95.68 101.36 114.46 127.22 13 68
Belize 88.75 94.13 102.64 115.70 127.06 14 69
Mexico 88.04 96.67 103.38 113.21 124.68 15 70
Venezuela 83.44 87.31 93.87 101.91 114.03 16 76
Colombia 70.47 76.97 83.12 89.75 105.32 17 80
Peru 71.58 75.71 82.36 92.69 104.50 18 81
Guyana 79.20 82.03 88.32 91.55 100.69 19 85
MEDIUM AVERAGE 87.42 92.74 99.64 110.57 123.11
Suriname 79.13 83.63 89.65 94.37 97.30 20 89
Panama 79.70 84.15 87.16 94.65 96.69 21 91
Ecuador 63.86 73.75 80.29 91.34 96.42 22 92
El Salvador 64.37 69.31 79.86 88.98 95.27 23 93
Dominican Rep. 71.91 74.19 79.47 84.67 94.50 24 95
Paraguay 60.44 66.68 69.37 74.78 77.59 25 110
Bolivia 58.87 63.71 66.30 70.23 73.24 26 116
Guatemala 50.30 56.82 60.64 68.28 72.34 27 117
Nicaragua 47.26 50.85 55.11 59.69 64.18 28 124
Honduras 46.68 51.20 53.47 58.20 63.35 29 125
Haiti 25.47 30.45 35.54 39.95 40.92 30 147
LOW AVERAGE 58.91 64.07 68.81 75.01 79.25
Source: ITU
Table 5: ICT-OI for OAS countries in the 2001-2005 period, values and rankings (2005)
Upper (ICT-OI values from 156 to 184): The four economies in this category have achieved a fairly
high level of access to, and use of, ICTs for most of their inhabitants.
Of the eight CITEL economies above the ICT-OI average, five are islands of the Caribbean
(Barbados, Antigua and Barbuda, Bahamas, Jamaica, and Grenada), together with Canada, the
United States, and Chile.
Middle (ICT-OI values from 100.69 to 143.31): The 11 economies in this category are
characterized by competitive markets and major advances in the mobile sector.
30
While nearly all the economies in this category have marketed broadband services, penetration
remains very low (under 1%) for nearly all.
Lower (ICT-OI values from 40.92 to 97.30): This category includes the economies with least
access to the Information Society, with few broadband services, and fixed line penetration
remaining low.
3.1.3. ICT-OI and the digital divide
The 2007 ICT-OI is obtained on the basis of 10 indicators, grouped in four subindices: the network
index, the skills index, the technologies appropriation index, and the intensity index.
Figure 17: ICT Opportunity Index with averages
The first objective of the ICT Opportunity Index is to identify the digital divide and help understand
how this gap has developed since the beginning of this century.
The index values clearly show that nearly all economies have made substantial progress since 2001.
The DIGITAL DIVIDE IN CITEL ICT Opportunity Index by averages
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
YEAR
O P P O R T U N I T Y I N D E X
HIGH AVERAGE 182.66 196.67 238.46 267.93 292.70
UPPER AVERAGE 110.49 129.33 143.12 152.49 165.93
Reference country 100.00 109.41 121.18 133.41 146.25
MIDDLE AVERAGE 87.42 92.74 99.64 110.57 123.11
LOWER AVERAGE 58.91 64.07 68.81 75.01 79.25
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
31
Apart from comparisons between countries, the ICT Opportunity Index method can emphasize
relative movements of different ICT-OI groups over the five years (2001-2005). According to the
ITU, it also demonstrates how rapidly the four ICT-OI groups are making progress by comparing
one to another, and that these standardized values are especially useful in analyzing the trend in
the digital divide.
It may be seen that the digital divide between the High group and all other groups has increased
throughout the five year period 2001-2005.
The digital divide has also grown between the Upper group and the Middle and Lower groups.
Of the four groups, that which has grown least in the ICT-OI in the five years is the Lower group.
Eventual cellular telephony saturation in CITEL’s more developed economies will enable the digital
divide partially to be reduced to the extent that the other, less developed, economies show high
rates of growth in mobile services.
The digital divide grows more acute when economies introduce broadband services and increase
penetration thereof. This impacts those cases of the Lower group where broadband services are
virtually nonexistent.
The ITU indicates that categorization into ICT Opportunity Index groups provides a useful tool to
analyze the trend and complexity of the digital divide, but that more specific country analyzes are
needed to understand why some countries are doing it better than others. To than end, the 2007
ICT-OI index and its subindices constitute a useful working framework.
According to the WSIS, “special attention should be given to the particular needs of people of:
• Developing countries,
• Countries with economies in transition
• Less developed countries (LDCs)
• Small island developing states (SIDS)
• Landlocked developing countries
• Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC)
• Countries and territories under occupation,
• Countries recovering from conflicts, and
• Countries and regions with special needs, and those in circumstances with severe impact on development, such as natural disasters.
The foregoing points to the difficulties faced by the less developed economies that also have very
low ICT Opportunity Index rankings.
At the global 2007 ICI-OI level presented by the ITU, which includes 183 economies, only three
CITEL Members are found in the Lower category. The WSIS status is also shown below:
• Nicaragua: HIPC
• Honduras: HIPC
• Haiti: LDC, SIDS, HIPC, Disaster
32
In its 2007 ICT-OI 2007 report, the ITU points to
a remarkable result for the Small Island
Developing States (SIDS), 60% of which overall
have higher ICT-OI values than their per capita
GDP would suggest. It is noted that the fact
that these economies occupy relative small land
areas is certainly an advantage at the time of
providing and expanding ICT access. Another
positive characteristic of the SIDS to be taken
into account is that, with high population
density, it is more difficult to provide ICT
infrastructure and access to a very widely
scattered population (as is the case in different
CITEL Member States with large populations and
territories, which appear below the ICT-OI
average for the region).
3.1.4. ITU 2007 ICT-OI Assessments
According to the ITU in its above-mentioned report, the ICT Opportunity Index (ICT-OI) is the ITU’s
most recent product in the area of international benchmarking.
The ICT-OI Index, which has benefited from the experience of different international and research
organizations, is based on a carefully selected list of indicators and a methodology. It is an
important tool for monitoring the digital divide by measuring the relative difference in ICT
Opportunity Index levels between economies over time. It also constitutes an important step in
achieving the objectives identified by WSIS by helping countries and regions to make realistic
evaluations of their performance. Apart from inter-country comparisons, the methodology of this
index underscores relative movements over the 2001-2005 period and indicates which countries are
making progress and how rapidly they are doing so.
The ICT Opportunity Index has shown the significant progress being made in all economies in all
areas of the telecommunications/ICT sector since the beginning of this century. But is also reflects
the fact that a digital divide continues to exist between the economies with better ICT-OI indices
and those with low values of this index.
The ITU, in examining the indicators, points out that most countries are remaining behind in terms
of appropriation of broadband and that the indicator with the most significant differences between
the economies with high ICT Opportunity Index indicators and the other economies is “broadband
penetration.” For policymakers, this suggests that more efforts need to be made to integrate and
consolidate broadband policies and strategies.
Lastly, the usefulness is underscored of the ICT Opportunity Index as a guideline to indicate those
countries that are achieving more over time. And, based on an appropriate definition of indicators
and their yearly review, the index will enable the impact of new policies and regulatory changes to
be evaluated.
Case of Nicaragua: Over the past few years in Nicaragua, the digital divide has been reduced although levels vary depending on the type of technology considered and the country’s economic situation. Nevertheless, to reach the development level of other countries much still needs to be done in the country. The elements that have an impact on this digital divide are the population’s lack of financial resources, geographically limited investment in communication and information infrastructure (where there is a clear difference between urban and rural areas), difficult geographical conditions, low level of education of the population, low levels of training in the use of ICTs, socioeconomic and cultural aspects, as well as the absence of electricity coverage in rural and marginal urban areas.
33
4. MARKET STRUCTURE
Connectivity in the region varies with the country considered. Two of the factors that have
contributed to ICT sector expansion have been privatization and competition (with the exception of
special cases, such as Costa Rica and Uruguay for certain services). It has been noted that, in
opening their telecommunication markets through “well-designed” reforms, government can create
competitive markets that grow rapidly, costs are low, innovation is facilitated, and user needs can
be more easily addressed.
Regulation of a country’s ICT sector is a key factor impacting Information Society (IS) penetration.
The existence of a regulatory framework establishes, promotes, and ensures investment in
infrastructure, technologies, and services, and plans for the inclusion of the population in the IS.
The process of convergence of networks and services is creating a new landscape, which means that
consideration must be given to creating regulatory and legislative conditions for uniform treatment
of the different networks, since digitization and informatization make possible their use in providing
different services.
Some presence of the state as the main fixed line operator may still be noted in the region. With
regard to levels of competition, it is important to note that in international calls, mobile telephony,
and the Internet, there is a strong trend toward full competition.
COUNTRY Separate
telecommu
nications
regulator
Situation of
main fixed
lines
operator
Level of
competition:
international
calls
Level of
competitio
n: mobile
Level of
competitio
n: Internet
provider
ANTIGUA and BARBUDA … Public M C C
ARGENTINA Si Private C C C
BAHAMAS No Public P M C
BARBADOS No Mixed … C …
BELIZE Yes Private C C C
BOLIVIA Yes Private M C C
BRAZIL Yes Private C C C
CANADÁ Yes Private C C C
CHILE .. Private C C C
COLOMBIA Yes Mixed C P C
COSTA RICA Yes Public M M M
DOMINICA … Mixed M M …
ECUADOR21 Yes Public P P C
EL SALVADOR No Mixed C C C
UNITED STATES Yes Private C C C
GRENADA … Mixed M M …
GUATEMALA Yes Private C C C
GUYANA … Mixed M C …
HAITI Yes Mixed P P C
HONDURAS Yes Public M M …
JAMAICA No Mixed C P C
21 At present in the country there is competition in mobile services.
34
COUNTRY Separate
telecommu
nications
regulator
Situation of
main fixed
lines
operator
Level of
competition:
international
calls
Level of
competitio
n: mobile
Level of
competitio
n: Internet
provider
MEXICO Yes Private C C C
NICARAGUA Yes Private C C C
PANAMA Yes Mixed C P C
PARAGUAY Yes Public M C C
PERU Yes Private C C C
DOMINICAN REPUBLIC Yes Private C C C
SAINT KITTS AND NEVIS … … … … …
SAINT LUCIA Yes Private M C M
SAINT VINCENT AND THE
GRENADINES
Yes Private C C C
SURINAME Yes Público M M P
TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Yes Mixed P M C
URUGUAY Yes Public P C C
VENEZUELA Yes Mixed C C C
TOTALES SI=25
NO=4
Private=1
4Mixed=1
1
Public=8
C=16
M=11
P=5
C=20
M=7
P=5
C=24
M=3
P=1
C=Competition, M=Monopoly, P=Partial competition
Note:The presence of Mixed capital in the Fixed column is included when at least one operator is Mixed
and there are no Public operators.
Sources:
o ITU – EYE ON ITCs 2007 http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/icteye/Indicators/Indicators.aspx o World Bank. 2006 Information and Communications for Development. Global trends and
policies. World Bank. 2006 o World Bank - ICT at a Glance 2005.
http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/DATASTATISTICS/0..contentMDK:20459133˜menuPK:1192714˜pagePK:64133150˜piPK:64133175˜theSitePK:239419.00.html
Table 6: Regulatory aspects and competition in OAS countries
In Central America, privatization is delayed vis-à-vis other countries of the region.
Privatization of telephone monopolies and telecommunication development are not directly related.
Countries where privatization has not taken place show some of the highest fixed telephony
penetration and connectivity rates in the region. Consequently, difficulties in telecommunication
modernization and development seem to be related to factors other than decisions to privatize.
4.1. Regulatory framework
4.1.1. Financial aspects of access to telecommunications One fundamental aspect is universal service/access, the means called upon for greatest
effectiveness in increasing access to telecommunications.
Most countries have opted for establishment of a universal service fund to finance these types of
initiatives, whereas a minority have opted for universal service obligations for which
35
telecommunication service licensees have responsibility (especially where monopolies still exist). It
is important to note that Chile, Guatemala, and Mexico utilize financing from public funds.22
Another case is the Dominican Republic, where the contribution is made directly from user invoices
(2%), according to ITU data.23
The problem therefore lies specifically in creating projects for the disbursement and use of the
respective funds in each country. Accordingly, it may be noted that, as of 2005, the percentage of
utilization of funds was relatively low: only 32%, which implies that full financial advantage is not
being taken of them.
Country
Name of
Fund
Disbursements
in relation to
2005
Argentina FFSU 0%
Bolivia FNDR 0%
Brazil FUST 0%
Chile FDT 100%
Colombia FCM 37%
Costa Rica No fund -
Cuba No fund -
Dominican Republic FDT 16%
Ecuador FODETEL 0%
El Salvador FINET 0%
Guatemala FONDETEL 43%
Honduras No fund -
Mexico FCST 100%
Nicaragua FITEL 19%
Panama No fund -
Paraguay FSU 96%
Peru FITEL 32%
Uruguay No fund -
Venezuela FSU 0%
AVERAGE OF COUNTRIES WITH FUND 32%
Source: Regulatel, 2006
Table 7: Percentages of disbursements of Funds in OAS countries
According to REGULATEL data, these same countries in 2005, had collected $2.6 billion in their
funds, but had spent only $297 million (10%, if countries that have not disbursed funds are
included). Chile, Mexico, and Paraguay have utilized over 90% of their funds, and failure by
countries to make disbursements may partially be attributed to legal disputes, diversion to other
uses, and restrictions imposed on the funds. The main delays have been than funds were specific
funds for specific projects, overestimation of the respective subsidies, bureaucratic procedures and
the reviews to which they are subject, limitations on operators themselves, or delays as a result of
studies and fulfillment of preliminary requirements.
22 Private financing, on the other hand, is based on the contribution of a percentage of operator
revenue or taxes on concessions or the administration thereof. 23 Although REGULATEL indicates that it is through taxes levied on operators.
36
As indicated above, there are several alternatives in establishing a telecommunication funds: taxes
on operators, contributions, fines, government budgetary allocations, and concessions. As may be
seen in Table 8, most countries in Latin America have used the direct telecommunication operator
taxation approach more than any other type of financing.
Country
Taxes on
operators Contributions Penalties
Government
budget Concessions
Argentina x
Bolivia x X
Brazil x
Chile x
Colombia x
Costa Rica
Cuba
Dominican Rep. x
Ecuador24 x
El Salvador x X X
Guatemala x X
Honduras
Mexico x
Nicaragua x
Panama
Paraguay x
Peru x
Uruguay
Venezuela x
Source: Regulatel, 2006
Table 8: Principal sources of the Funds of the OAS countries in 2005
Country N.C Strategy Name Creation Funding Services
Argentina C Universal Service
Fund
Universal Access Trust Fund
(Fondo Fiduciario del Acceso
Universal* - FFSU)
* 1% of operators’
earnings
Mainly
telephony and
secondly
Internet
Bolivia M Universal Service
Obligations
Rural coverage obligations 1995 Charged to
concession
holders
Telephony
Brazil C Universal Service
Fund
Telecommunication Services
Universalization Fund (Fondo
de Universalización de los
Servicios de
Telecomunicaciones—FUST)
2000 1% operators’
billing
Telephony
Chile P Universal Service
Fund
Telecommunications
Development Fund (Fondo de
Desarrollo de las
Telecomunicaciones—FDT)
1994 Government
funding
Telephony and
Internet
Colombia P Universal Service
Fund
Communications Fund 1999 Government and
private-sector
funding
Telephony and
Internet
24 Although the country reports that it is by means of contributions.
37
Country N.C Strategy Name Creation Funding Services
Costa Rica M Universal Service
Fund
Universal
Telecommunications Service
Fund
** ___ ___
Ecuador P Universal Service
Fund
Telecommunications
Development Fund (Fondo
para el desarrollo de las
Telecomunicaciones—
FODETEL)
2000 1% operators’
billing
Telephony and
Internet
El Salvador C Universal Service
Fund
Electricity and Telephony
Investment Fund (Fondo de
Inversión en Electricidad y
Telefonía—FINET)
1998 Government
funding
allocations,
98.5% of the
earnings from
concessions and
other
administrative
procedures and
part of the
earnings
obtained from
concessions on
energy
resources
Telephony and
Electricity
Guatemala C Universal Service
Fund
Telephony Development Fund
(Fondo para el desarrollo de
la telefonía—FONDETEL)
1996 70% of the
revenues from
the auction of
spectrum use
rights
Telephony
Honduras M No plan ___ ___ ___ ___
Mexico*** C Universal Service
Fund
Telecommunication Social
Coverage Fund (Fondo de
Cobertura Social de
Telecomunicaciones—FCST)
2002 Government
funding
Telephony***
*
Nicaragua C Universal Service
Fund
Telecommunication
Investment Fund (Fondo de
Inversión en
Telecomunicaciones—FITEL)
2004 20% of TELCOR
earnings
Telephony and
Internet
Panama****
*
C Universal Service
Obligations
Universal Service Obligations 1997 Until 2004,
charged to
Cable &
Wireless, which
had exclusive
rights to provide
basic
telecommunicati
on services
Telephony
Paraguay M Universal Service
Fund
Universal Services Fund 1995 40% of the
contributions
from the
business
development
rate
Telephony and
Internet
38
Country N.C Strategy Name Creation Funding Services
Peru P Universal Service
Fund
Telecommunication
Investment Fund (Fondo de
Inversión en en
Telecomunicaciones—FITEL)
1993 1% operators’
gross earnings
billed and
collected,
special public
funding
allocations
Telephony and
Internet
Dominican
Republic
C Universal Service
Fund
Telecommunication
Development Fund (Fondo de
Desarrollo de las
Telecomunicaciones—FDT)
1998 Charged to the
users, who pay
2% on the
amount of their
bills
Telephony and
Internet
Uruguay M Not established by a
regulatory framework
___ ___ Charged to
ANTEL
Telephony and
Internet
Venezuela C Universal Service
Fund
Universal Service Fund
(Fondo de Servicio
Universal—FSU)
2000 1% of gross
earnings of
operatorss
Telephony and
Internet
M=Monopoly; D=Duopoly;P=Partial Competition;C=Free Competition. Source: ITU World Telecommunications Regulatory
Database (data for 2004)
* Provided for by Decree 764/2000 but not yet operating.
** Under way. Telecommunication sector is in the process of being reformed.
*** It is not a universal access or service fund in the strictest meaning of the term. It involves a temporary fund comprised of
government resources used to fund specific projects.
**** Government and residential telephony on networks with data transmission capacity.
***** Draft bill for a Universal Service Act.
Data source: Regulatel and Universal Access in Latin America: Status and challenges of the ITU.
Table 9: Strategies for the funding of Universal Service in Latin America
4.1.2. Investment in ICTs
According to ECLAC data,25 the LAC countries each year spend on ICTs nearly six times less than do
the developed countries. Low per capita income in the region is jeopardizing ICT expansion.
As may be seen in Table 10, Jamaica has committed one of the highest percentage of gross
domestic product (GDP) for expenditure on ICTs, whereas Ecuador has the lowest percentage for
this same item.
25 “Políticas públicas para el desarrollo de la Sociedad de la Información en América Latina y el
Caribe” (Public policymaking for the development of the Information Soceity in Latin America and the
Caribbean).
39
Country
Spending on ICT
2005 (%)
Jamaica 10.6
Colombia 8.5
Panama 8.4
Uruguay 7.9
Brazil 7.8
Costa Rica 7.7
United States 7.3
Argentina 7.1
Peru 6.6
Chile 6.1
Canada 5.9
Bolivia 5.5
Honduras 4.6
Venezuela 3.9
Mexico 3.3
Ecuador 3.2
Source: World Bank
Table 10: Expenditure on ICTs as a percentage of GDP in OAS countries in 2005
This is also related to the priority attached by governments to initiatives developed in the ICT
sector.
Table 11 shows the United States as the country with the highest percentage, whereas Paraguay
and Ecuador are at the bottom of the table.
Country Priority - 2005
United States 5.3
Chile 4.9
Jamaica 4.9
Canada 4.5
Venezuela 4.4
Dominican Republic 4.3
Brazil 4.0
El Salvador 4.0
Mexico 4.0
Trinidad and Tobago 3.8
Colombia 3.7
Nicaragua 3.7
Uruguay 3.6
Honduras 3.4
Panama 3.4
Argentina 3.2
Guyana 3.2
Peru 3.2
Costa Rica 3.1
Bolivia 3.0
40
Country Priority - 2005
Guatemala 3.0
Ecuador 2.4
Paraguay 2.4
Source: World Bank
Table 11: Priority of governments of the OAS countries for the ICT sector in 2005
4.1.3. Revenue of ICTs, prices of telecommunication services, price trends With regard to telecommunication service prices and their trends, it is important to refer to the
study “Affordability of Mobile Telephony Services in Latin America,”26 since this is the ICT cellular
service that has contributed most to reducing the digital divide in the Americas. It analyzes
Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, and Peru, which account for 78% of the total mobile market
(although it also refers to their fixed telephony tariff plans).
The results confirm the high costs of accessing this telephony service, despite the reduction in
tariffs that competition has promoted. It also recommends the implementation of new commercial
practices involving per second tariffs or the possibility of making small refunds (micro refunds).
Even so, the lowest income segments show some preference for mobile services owing to the
marketing models (prepaid and “caller pays”).
26 Sponsored by the Regional Dialogue on the Information Society (DIRSI).
41
5. CHALLENGES OF ICT SECTOR TRENDS
This section will set out challenges posed by trends in the telecommunication, information, and
broadcasting sectors, among which we emphasize the following:
5.1. Digital broadcasting services
These being a vital part of the information and communications infrastructure of the region, it is
expected that during the next decade, the region’s national broadcasting systems will be updated
from analogue to digital technology, keeping pace with digital advances that are redefining all types
of world telecommunications.
Thus far, three main standards are being adopted worldwide for DTT:
– ISDB-T: Terrestrial Integrated Services Digital Broadcasting (Japanese standard)27
– DVB-T/H: Digital Video Broadcasting Terrestrial/Handheld (European standard)
– ATSC: Advanced Television System Committee (United States standard)
One difference between these standards is that portable and mobile applications (cellular television
reception or high speed PDAs) are not included in ATSC, since it was oriented towards meeting fixed
needs, but these may be implemented via other alternatives using the same channel or separate
channels,28 unlike DVB-T and ISDB-T, which do include them in the standard. Even DVB-T
incorporates some synergy by integrating these characteristics with GSM. This is summarized in
Table 12.
COUNTRY STANDARDS ADOPTED29
Brazil SBTVD (modified version of ISDB)
Canada ATSC
United States ATSC
Honduras ATSC
Mexico ATSC
Uruguay DVB-T / DVB-H
Table 12: Countries that have adopted DTT standards in the region
Based on the experiences of some countries and national DTT broadcasting policies, it is
recommended that at least the following aspects be taken into consideration:
1. License eligibility and spectrum use criteria;
2. Licensing and channel assignment procedures;
27 The Brazilian Digital Terrestrial Television System (SBTVD) is the Brazilian modified version of
this standard. 28 For example, Digital Multimedia Broadcasting (DMB) in South Korea. 29 Sources:http://www.atsc.org/ and http://www.dvb.org/about_dvb/dvb_worldwide/index.xml
42
3. Terms and conditions for such licenses (whether or not linked to analog television licenses,
license duration, permitted services, and obligations to the public sector);
4. Transition and spectrum recapture plans and schedules;
5. Minimum technical requirements for DTT receivers;
6. Anti-piracy mechanisms (authorized redistribution).
It is important to note that in the case of Brazil, research for DTT was financed by the
Telecommunication Technology Development Fund (FUNTTEL), which might encourage other
countries to adopt this type of initiative.
5.2. Implementation of IP telephony
Data networks are becoming the universal transport medium for all types of communication services
– voice, video, or data. Regulatory bodies are considering a wide array of issues, such as the
advisability of creating a regulatory framework for the implementation of IP telephony and the need
for regulation thereof. Adding voice to the traffic of IP-based networks poses challenges regarding
the strategies to be followed in implementing the transition from some networks to others.
Voice over IP has been one of the dynamizing aspects of the world cable market, specifically
because over such networks “triple play” services may be provided easily, only needing to be
completed with telephony. The following table summarizes some of the regulatory aspects for
telephony in three different areas: VoIP, public telephony, and universal service.
Regulations VoIP (PC
to PC)
without
numbering
VoIP (PC to
telephone)
with
numbering
Public
telephony
Universal
service
Service interconnection and
interoperability
Yes Yes Yes
Access to emergency services ? Yes Yes
Access to directory and guidebook
services
Yes Yes
Call tapping (nationwide) ? Yes Yes
Number portability Yes Yes Yes
Use of telephone numbering Yes Yes Yes
Spending monitoring (detailed
rates)
Yes Yes Yes
Shutdown rates in certain services
(for example: additional tariff
setting)
Yes Yes Yes
Consumer protection in contracts,
service quality, billing or claims
Yes Yes Yes
Network security and integrity ? Yes Yes
Services for the disabled ? ? Yes
Source: Technical Notebook 2 CITEL (2006-2007)
Table 13: Regulatory aspects for telephony
43
The status of regulation in some countries is based on information from the Technical Notebook
of CITEL (2006-2007) on the topic:
• Argentina: “Telephony via IP protocol” is not classified as a service as such and,
as a result, it has not been specifically regulated.
• Brazil: Service provision is permitted using the IP protocol, only by
telecommunication companies with a license (concession, permit or authorization)
granted by ANATEL (www.anatel.gov.br).
• Canada: it has classified this service as “another type of telephone service;” nevertheless,
it was incorporated into its regulatory structure in 1997 because providers of international
telephony service over IP required a license from CRTC30 to provide the public with this
service. The decisions taken by the regulatory agency about telephony over IP are
governed by the principles of technological neutrality.
• Colombia: In April 2006, the Ministry of Communications enacted a concept in which VoIP
service is classified as a value-added service, as this service does not require regulation.
• Costa Rica: VoIP is not regulated and the delivery of telecommunication services
is governed by the state enterprise Costa Rican Electricity Institute (Instituto
Costarricense de Electricidad—ICE).
• Chile: Local public telephony service concessions have been granted to companies
that use IP protocol based technology (not Internet) in dedicated network
architecture, with the same regulatory framework as for those that use traditional
means. Voice-over-Internet services, however, are different. In Chile, for these
services, domestic and foreign companies are operating, providing voice-over-
Internet services on the basis of the PC-to-PC or PC-to-phone models. These
services are operating in the understanding that they are services on Internet,
which is a network that is not regulated.
• Dominican Republic: INDOTEL does not regulate technology, but it does regulate services
pursuant to Law 153-98 (see: www.indotel.org.do). To provide voice service via IP
technology, a concession is required.
• Ecuador: Because CONATEL deems that voice over Internet is a technological
application that is developed and available on Internet, it adopted Resolution 491-
21-CONATEL-2006, whereby it establishes the existence of various modalities for
its use and expressly declares that voice, video, data and multimedia provided
over Internet are technological applications. Therefore it eliminated the
restrictions imposed on the provision of these applications by cybercafes in order
to promote their use and the use of Internet.
• United States: VoIP services are closely related to broadband access. The 1996
Telecommunications Law defines telecommunications as the transmission, between points
specified by the user, of information that the users exchange, without any change in format
or content of the information. Likewise, it defines information services as the supply of
capacity to generate, acquire, store, transform, process, retrieve, use or make available
information via telecommunications. It must be pointed out that the United States does not
consider the term telephony over IP, rather it recognizes the term Voice IP. The FCC
published a notice (NPRM: WC Dockett No. 04-36) on VoIP activities.
• Mexico: The legal and regulatory framework is clearly aimed at regulating the delivery of
telecommunication services and is neutral with respect to the technological means whereby
30 Canadian Commission for Radio-Television and Telecommunications.
44
these services are provided. This makes it possible for telecommunication service providers
to freely choose the technology and, as a result, they will have the capacity to introduce, on
a timely basis, new technologies into their networks for better delivery of services to users,
on the basis of their business plans. As set forth by the Federal Telecommunication Law,31
for the installation and operation and a public telecommunication network whereby
telecommunication services are provided, a concession must be granted by the Secretariat
of Communications and Transportation. As for the Telecommunication Regulations,32 it
establishes that voice services are a basic telephony public service, and therefore the
delivery of these services is subject to obtaining a concession as referred to above.
• Paraguay: Telephony over IP is not specifically classified as a telecommunication service,
and therefore the provision of telephony service is classified as a basic service. As a result,
it can only be provided by the Basic Service Concession Holder, regardless of the
technology used. Furthermore, CONATEL has included Access to Internet Service under the
general category of telecommunication services, and Service Regulations do not envisage
the possibility of providing telephony over IP.
• Peru: Internet is a value-added service. Peruvian legislation excludes voice traffic in real
time from its value-added service classification. In other words, ISPs are forbidden to
provide voice in real time. As a result, the discussion focuses on whether the IP voice
service takes place in real time or not. Finally, in Peru, it is the service not the technology
that is considered to be regulated.
In 2004, OSILAC had also indicated that Latin America was behind in authorizing and regulating
VoIP (Figure 18), which may partially be explained by the steep growth in traffic (legal and illegal)
towards this region, as may be seen in Figure 19.
Figure 18: Percentage of countries by region that authorize and regulate VoIP (2004)
Translation: Authorized VoIP calls. VoIP regulation. Caribbean. Latin America. OECD.
Source: OSILAC, based on ITU data from the Regulatory Knowledge Centre, official website.
31 Federal Telecommunications Law (Ley Federal de Telecomunicaciones), published in the Official
Registration of the Federation on June 17, 1995. 32 Telecommunication Regulations (Reglamento de Telecomunicaciones), published in the Official
Register of the Federation on October 29, 1990.
45
Note: In the case of authorized VoIP calls, the data correspond to 15 Caribbean, 17 Latin American,
and 28 OECD countries. In the case and regulation of VoIP, the data correspond to 9 Caribbean, 10
Latin American, and 20 OECD countries.
Figure 19: International switched and VoIP traffic, by region of destination, 2004
Translation: Switched. Middle East. Latin America and the Caribbean. Source. Official website.
Note: The graphs represent the total percentage of incoming, switched, and VoIP traffic, by region.
Voice over IP (VoIP) traffic includes all international calls transmitted over IP networks ending in
switched telephony networks. PC to PC calls are excluded.
Lastly, it is important to note that North America is showing steep annual growth in global traffic
and that in the countries of Latin America and the Caribbean there is a lag.
Source: Regulatel
Figure 20: Growth in global VoIP traffic
5.3. Universal Service/Access Not all countries have a universal service/access policy and, where they exist, they differ with
regard to their application towards rural or low purchasing power areas. Architecture and objectives
46
also differ from country to country. Initially oriented toward fixed telephony, with the advancement
towards access to advanced services, there are now efforts to incorporate the Internet and
broadband as a priority objective (such as in Chile and Uruguay), whereas other countries are
directing it towards access to cellular telephony and community Internet access.
The choice of a specific universal service/access provision system is a complex matter that depends
on the country’s general ICT policy; the status of the telecommunication environment, regulations,
subsidies, and taxes.
Universal access means achieving greater access to public communications media, e.g.,
communities provided with public telephones or community telecenters. Universal service seeks to
convert most of the population into subscribers of some telecommunication service. This latter case
is still not a goal in the region, according to REGULATEL.
CITEL was given a lead part so as to contribute to actions to ensure and facilitate universal
access/service policies in the Americas. In that context, through Permanent Consultative
Committee I: Public Telecommunication Services (PCC.I) and the Working Group on Basic and
Universal Service (WGBUS), it has been providing assistance in developing guidelines to implement
and/or increase existing programs in an effort to bring basic telecommunication services to all
inhabitants of the Americas. The WGBUS became an active forum for sharing information and
experiences, examining universal service programs in the region.
Universal service and universal access are different concepts distinguished as follows:
“Universal access: Refers to reasonable telecommunications access for all. Includes
universal service for those that can afford individual telephone service, and … provision of
public telephones within a reasonable distance for others.”
“Universal service: Refers to availability, non-discriminatory access and wide-spread
affordability of telephone service. The level of universal service is statistically measured as
the percentage of households with a telephone.” 33
Regulations in the countries of the Americas, in their respective environments, include definitions of
different terms and, for the most part, focus only on telephony service. In very few cases does the
legislation of the countries reviewed expressly regulate universal service or provide a specific
definition. Similarly, in all countries, universal service policies have been implemented based on
objectives of existing legislation or instruments adopted to restructure the telecommunication
sector.
Regulatory strategies have essentially only been oriented toward establishing universal service rules
in a competitive environment.
In this context, but broadening the panorama to include other technologies, there are four public
policy alternatives to provide universal access:
(i) Expansion and deepening of mobile telephony;
33 ITU: World Telecommunications Development Report: Universal Access.
47
(ii) Extension of connectivity by means of other wireless networks (such as Wi-Fi, WiMAX,
and 3G);
(iii) Establishment of computer networks with broadband Internet access by means of
wireless networks in public access centers and other access sites;
(iv) Exploration of new alternatives, such as digital terrestrial television.
The countries of the region have implemented initiatives that have employed some combination of
the following mechanisms:
1. Market liberalization and regulatory initiatives including universal access obligations;
2. Universal service funds: Partial subsidies for specific programs and projects;
3. Other financing methods and projects assumed by national, state, and local governments,
cooperatives, and NGOs;
4. State mandates and state control through cross-subsidies and other means.
As indicated earlier, the first generation of universal access programs were simple programs focused
on establishing public telephony, although it is recommended that the next generation of programs
should be more complex and focus on infrastructure for services that use convergent IP platforms,
such as community telecenters (also called infocenters, Internet kiosks, community centers, or
intelligent centers).
This trend may be seen in Table 14, where telecenters are being incorporated as a new alternative
beyond telephony:
Country
Public
Telephony Tele-centers
Argentina x X
Bolivia x X
Brazil x
Chile x X
Colombia x X
Dominican Republic x X
Ecuador X
El Salvador X
Guatemala x
Mexico x
Nicaragua x X
Panama - -
Paraguay x
Peru x X
Uruguay - -
Venezuela X
Source: Regulatel, 2006
Table 14: Application of universal access funds in 2005 in OAS countries
The 27,131 public telephones installed at 12,927 sites have benefited nearly 10.7 million people
who formerly had to travel hundreds of kilometers to communicate, according to REGULATEL. One
of the countries most benefited has been Peru, where the average distance to a public telephone
48
has been reduced from 60 to 6 km. Such funds also financed 19,190 telecenters, which benefited
9.77 million people.
Case of Colombia: Compartel Program in Colombia The Compartel Program was born in 1998 with the implementation of Community Rural Telephony projects aimed at meeting the basic telecommunication needs of those years. Afterwards by 2000 Internet access center, telecenters, started being installed, and by 2004 it became apparent that State also needed to implement ICTs in its institutions. As a result, the Broadband Connectivity for Public Institutions Project was drawn up; to date, it has established connections in 10,695 institutions throughout the country. In other words, when the Rural Telephony Program became the Broadband Connectivity Project, the goal also shifted. Other projects have also been carried out and they are described below. As for universal access, two thematic lines have been developed as a strategy to reach the goals that were set. Initially, as of 1999, the Community Rural Telephony Project was developed, bringing benefits to 100% of the municipalities in the country, achieving 10,045 community rural telephony points with 13,572 lines functioning for telephony service. As for connectivity and Internet access, work is being done on two lines of projects; the first is known as community telecenters, with 1,530 telecenters installed and benefiting 100% of the country’s municipalities, with an impact on more than 5 million Colombians. The second line of projects focuses on what is known as Broadband Connectivity for Public Institutions, which at December 31, 2007 reported connectivity installed in 10,695 institutions, of which 8,723 are public schools, 1,026 mayor’s offices (out of the 1,098 existing), 703 public hospitals, 51 town councils, 76 ICBF centers, 57 Provincial Business Management Centers, 42 military units, 15 Emergency and Security Centers (Centros de Emergencia y Seguridad—SIES), and two penitentiaries. As for Universal Service, the Compartel Program has developed two projects: one is a line of projects aimed at expanding and replacing switched basic public telephony lines, which has installed 146,871 telephone lines suitable for broadband connectivity (xDSL) in 62 municipalities of 15 departments. For 2008, the goal is to install 72,424 additional lines already under contract in 73 municipalities in 17 departments, amounting to 219,295 telephone lines suitable for broadband connectivity (xDSL) in Colombian households. Furthermore, in 2007, the Compartel Program contracted the enlargement of broadband connectivity networks for the benefit of the productive sector (MMSEs) and households in strata 1 and 2 and rural areas, all of which requires the installation of 79,644 new access (for the most part using xDSL technologies), of which 39,456 pertain to strata 1 and 2 and rural areas and 40,188 MMSEs. Mostly satellite solutions have been implemented in the various telephony and Internet projects because of difficulties of gaining access to the country’s rural population, geographical location, and security matters in isolated cases. More then 20,000 points in VSAT systems are currently operating. Regarding the Compartel Program in Colombia, US$876,887 million pesos m/cte have been invested in the various telephony and Internet projects.
49
The most commonly used mechanism used to
allocate universal access funds has been to
award projects to companies whose bids
provide for the least subsidy and the
payment of subsidies over a period of time,
based on results obtained.
The recommendations made by REGULATEL,
complemented by CITEL, for a next
generation of universal access programs are:
1. To update and redefine universal
access and establish new goals:
a. To develop a new structure
that includes more detailed
concepts and definitions that
make decisions clearer and
more explicit.
b. To establish measurable goals
for time periods of at least five
years (reviewed every two).
c. To identify compensations and
opportunity costs arising from
selection from among different
goals and priorities.
d. To define which basic services
and/or infrastructures may be
included in universal access,
universal coverage, and
universal service programs.
e. To promote the rapid
expansion of backbone
networks and wireless access
technologies in rural and low
income areas.
2. To step up, simplify, and diversify
the use of universal access funds:
a. To provide greater autonomy,
responsibility, and
transparency of funds and
minimize the number of
approvals.
b. To simplify and make the
allocation of funds more
expeditious.
c. To establish mechanisms which promote small operators and risk-based companies.
d. To diversify resource allocation mechanisms in the fund.
Case of Ecuador: Pilot projects in Ecuador The National Telecommunication Council and the National Telecommunication Secretariat (Consejo Nacional de Telecomunicaciones y la Secretaría Nacional de Telecomunicaciones—CONATEL/SENATEL) have their own funds on the basis of which they implement the strategies that are needed to implement the National Universal Service Plan, whose mission is to extend access of a well-defined set of telecommunication services to all the inhabitants of the country’s territory, regardless of their economic, social, or geographic condition at affordable prices and due quality, through pay phones, public phones, community telecenters, community terminals with Internet access, and similar means. At present, Ecuador is implementing the following pilot projects: o To provide Internet service using the Fund for the
Development of Telecommunications in Rural and Marginal Urban Areas (Fondo para el Desarrollo de las Telecomunicaciones en Areas Rurales y Urbano Marginales—FODETEL): o Access to broadband Internet in rural and
marginal urban schools in the province of Pichincha, bringing benefits to 10 schools.
o Access to Internet in public schools of the rural and marginal urban areas of the Metropolitan District of Quito, bringing benefits to 60 schools.
o Installing and operating a network of telecenters in rural indigenous communities in the province of Chimborazo, bringing benefits to 50 localities.
o Access to Internet the schools of “Fe y Alegría” in the rural and marginal urban areas of 7 provinces of Ecuador, bringing benefits to 20 schools.
o To provide Internet service using the Rural Marginal Fund (Fondo Rural Marginal—FRM): o First phase of “Agreements for the
Implementation of Projects Attributable to the Marginal Rural Fund between SENATEL and the companies ANDINATEL S.A. and PACIFICTEL S.A., for the provision of Internet service, for the benefit of schools and not-for-profit social development organizations, benefiting 2,000 low-income schools.”
o Implementation of the Polyvalent Community Telecenters Subcomponent for the provision of public telephony services through Polyvalent Community Telecenters and Remote Stations. Private-sector investment plus funding from the Ecuadorian State, brining benefits to 1,120 rural and marginal urban localities.
50
e. To implement mechanisms which permit and facilitate projects designed by
operators.
f. To finance pilot programs and other types of initiatives.
g. A combination of models is recommended, that is, both government and industry
contribute funding.
h. To emphasize the part played by public content development capacity and to
promote higher demand for ICT use.
i. To adopt prepayment mechanisms and to penalize the lack of the use of the fund.
3. Implementation of legal, regulatory, and institutional reforms to bridge the market
efficiency divide:
a. To create strong leadership that coordinates ICT initiatives.
b. It is imperative to maximize the participation the all stakeholders: government (at
all levels), regulator, concession holders, and industry-related associations.
c. To update and revise regulations to take account of technical and market
innovations.
d. To create the following structures
i) Consultation and participation
ii) Community assimilation
iii) Training
As indicated in the Technical Notebook “Study of the Economic Aspects of Universal Service” by
CITEL, an effective access policy must focus on:
• Expanding new access services, instead of promoting existing ones.
• Expanding service to remote or high-cost areas and to low-income groups where service
delivery is not cost-effective.
• Expanding public access services instead of residential or private services.
It is important to mention each country’s percentages of rural vis-à-vis urban population, provided
by the World Bank, in order to take account of this highly important aspect in universal
service/access and possible technological solutions, which may opt for temporary or permanent
wireless systems.34 This is shown in Table 15.
34 It must be borne in mind that there are a limited number of wireless solutions or those that may later be replaced by more promising cable solutions, such as fiber optic.
51
Country Rural Population
2005 (%)
Trinidad and Tobago 88
Guyana 72
Saint Lucia 72
Grenada 69
Saint Kitts and Nevis 68
Antigua and Barbuda 61
Haiti 61
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 54
Guatemala 53
Honduras 53
Belize 52
Barbados 47
Jamaica 47
Nicaragua 41
Paraguay 41
El Salvador 40
Costa Rica 38
Ecuador 37
Bolivia 36
Dominican Republic 33
Panama 29
Colombia 27
Dominica 27
Peru 27
Suriname 26
Mexico 24
Canada 20
United States 19
Brazil 16
Chile 12
Argentina 10
Bahamas 10
Uruguay 8
Venezuela 7
Sources: World Bank
Table 15: Rural population as a percentage of total population in the countries of the Americas (2005)
The rural cases of Haiti, Honduras, and Nicaragua are of concern, since they have large territories
and populations, and the status of their development of some ICT aspects, especially fixed and
mobile telephony, is difficult.
52
Case of Mexico: National e-Mexico System Project entrusted in 2001 by the Office of the President of the Republic to be coordinated by the Communications and Transportation Secretariat (Secretaría de Comunicaciones y Transportes—SCT) The National e-Mexico System is an integrative project that coordinates the interests of different levels of government, various public institutions and agencies, telecommunication network operators, chambers and associations involved in information and communication technologies (ICTs), as well as various institutions in order to enlarge the coverage of basic services such as education, health, economy, government and science, technology and industry, as well as the other services being provided to the community. BACKGROUND: On December 1, President Vicente Fox appointed the architect Secretary Pedro Cerisola y Weber to be in charge of the System. On August 31, 2001, the Council of the National e-Mexico System was established, with the participation of various federal government agencies, to bring together the policies and projects of each agency under one single approach. VISION TOWARD 2025: We shall live in a structure of social organization, the Information and Knowledge Society, where all Mexicans evolve in an environment of equal opportunities for access to knowledge, learning and education, through the intelligent use and development of new technologies, which shall be at the service of society. MISSION: To be an agent of change in the country by bringing together the efforts being made by many public and private stakeholders in reducing the digital divide and the socioeconomic differences between Mexicans, through a system of technological and social components that provide basic services such as learning, health, trade, and government procedures, while spearheading Mexico’s technological development. GOAL: To generate alternatives of value through a technological system with social content that provides tools and opportunities that can be reach through information and communication technologies to improve the quality of life of all Mexicans. ORGANIZATION: The system is organized into three major lines: connectivity, contents, and the system. CONNECTIVITY: Basically the actions for connectivity focus on two aspects: 1. The investments that are being made by the telecommunication network operators to increase the
telephony service infrastructure and coverage in Mexican households. 2. Creating a network of Digital Community Centers (Centros Comunitarios Digitales—CCDs) used to
provide connectivity to those population groups and families that, because of economic and geographic constraints, do not have the telecommunication infrastructure need to gain access to dedicated connectivity inside the home.
CONTENTS: The system’s contents are comprised of the following: e-learning, e-health, e-economy, e-science, technology and industry, e-government. SYSTEMS: Focusing on three items: 1. Portal of portals:
The most important element of the portal is without a doubt the citizen-friendly orientation; services and information shall be shall be all the more useful by being organized on the basis of the principal hubs of life, that is, the home, cars, the family, taxes, education, health, and business. And each involves the delivery of different services. The basic guideline is to provide one single approach for the citizen, that is, by integrating and developing the portals for e-government, e-health, e-learning, e-science, technology and industry, state and municipal portals. To do this, hard work is required for their development, to then shift to the convergence phase.
2. Neutral Access Point (NAP):
This is the center where traffic of the data networks of all the operators of public networks and the private networks that are required shall be exchanged, so as to optimize access to the contents of e-Mexico, without the need for the traffic of this information to leave the country to be exchange between the operators of Mexico and without the need of requiring bilateral agreements between specific Mexican operators.
3. Data Center (Government Computer Center)
This is the equipment that is needed to concentrate the systems on the basis of which e-Mexico shall operate at his first levels of information structure and from which it shall be connected with the rest of the contents residing in each agency or entity in particular. It shall require computer technology and infrastructure resources, its interconnection to the NAP and the services needed to keep them operating, among other aspects. Source: http://www.e-mexico.gob.mx
53
5.3.1. Telecenters (public access centers)
Educational centers, municipalities, public libraries, health centers, foundations, and companies are
places where telecenters for public Internet access centers are typically found.
High management and maintenance costs are aspects most negatively impacting these types of
initiatives. No single effective formula has been developed to achieve telecenter self-sufficiency.
It is important to note that these projects do not provide for Internet access alone. Typically they
provide other services, such as information technology courses, printing, photocopying,
videoconferencing, Internet access, chat, e-mail, and other IT services.
Paraguay has the largest number of potential users per access center, whereas, surprisingly,
Argentina ranks among the lowest (Table 16).
Country Users Paraguay 104,208 Nicaragua 52,964 Uruguay 18,743 Bolivia 8,353 El Salvador 8,284 Brazil 8,143 Colombia 5,742 Chile 3,454 Guatemala 2,423 Costa Rica 2,238 Mexico 1,300 Ecuador 1,085 Peru 1,017 Argentina 889 Average LA 2,345
Source: ECLAC, 2005
Table 16: Average number of potential users per public ICT access center
The telecenter concept used by ECLAC is the public Internet access center (PIAC), and its definition
is based on that agreed at the Global Indicators Workshop on Community Access to ICTs, held in
Mexico City, in November 2004:
“A public Internet access centre (PIAC) is a site, location, centre of instruction at which
Internet access is made available to the public, on a full-time or part-time basis”.
54
Digital community centers, Internet cafés,
libraries, educational centers, and other similar
establishments are included in this group,
provided they provide access to the general
public. All such centers must make available to
the public at least one computer for Internet
access. In one ECLAC study,39 PIACs were
defined as all centers with had a computer but
not Internet access.
A special type of center is the Educational
Technology Access Center (ETAC), which are
ICT access programs found in educational
institutions (schools, universities, etc.). Such
centers do not provide access to the general
public, but only to students, teachers, and staff
associated with the institution. However, this
type of center offers a series of possibilities,
since they make it possible to use ICTs outside
of school hours, which would make it possible
to increase general public access to ICTs at a
lower cost per program and optimizing existing
infrastructure resources.
For the ECLAC study, information was compiled
regarding PIACs in 14 CITEL countries, most of
which are faced with the challenge of reducing
the digital divide vis-à-vis the more developed
countries, according to the ITU’s 2007 ICT-OI
index.
The table below shows the PIACs identified in
14 CITEL countries. It is of concern that it does not show a steep rise in the number of such
initiatives:
35 Information to December 2007. 36 Half-Yearly Internet Report of December 2006 from CRT, published in May 2007. 37 Half-Yearly Internet Report of June 2007 from CRT, published in October 2007. 38 According to the baseline of the Ministry of National Education and the Field Studies of the
Compartel Program. 39 “Centros de acceso público a las tecnologías de información and comunicación en Latin America:
características and desafíos” (Centers for the public access to information and communication technologies
in Latin America: characteristics and challenges” (March 2006).
Case of Colombia: In 2007, the Compartel Program opened up, for the community, 1,670 telecenters, of which 1,530 were for communities and 140 for schools, in the framework of a strategy of openness to the community, as Centers for Community Access to Internet. At present, the Compartel Program is promoting initiatives and strategy enabling public institutions such as schools, libraries, etc., to benefit from broadband connectivity, open their doors to the community and to set up Centers for Community Access to Internet. Furthermore, inter-agency agreements drawn up by the Compartel Program have made it possible to use telecenters for specific purposes such as the strategy to incorporate ICTs. For example, with the National Learning Service (Servicio Nacional de Aprendizaje—SENA), virtual training has been provided to 9,370 Colombians through Compartel telecenters. With the National Federation of Coffee Growers, 1,106 coffee farmers have been trained in computer technical and coffee institutional capacity building in Compartel telecenters.35 “About 20% of the total number of users (in Colombia) are the outcome of Compartel’s efforts to implement state policies for massively extending access to Internet.”36 The “Collective Centers grew by 62%, largely owing to the result of Compartel’s efforts in state policymaking for the mass access to Internet.”37 In the education sector alone, it is estimated that 5 million students38 are beneficiaries of Compartel’s program for broadband Internet connectivity. Likewise, it is estimated that 5 million Colombians gain access to the telecenters of Compartel’s Program in 100% of the country’s municipalities.
55
Country 2005 2006 2007 Argentina 28,401 30,202 30,202 Bolivia 884 904 904 Brazil 11,154 11,154 11,154 Chile 2,733 2,863 3,063 Colombia 6,078 6,088 6,098 Costa Rica 1,199 1,199 1,199 El Salvador 618 618 618 Ecuador 9,577 10,088 10,088 Guatemala 55 74 74 Mexico 58,188 60,198 60,213 Nicaragua 84 1,471 1,471 Paraguay 48 50 50 Peru 19,936 19,936 22,776 Uruguay 109 109 144 Total 139,064 144,954 148,054
Source: ECLAC
Table 17: Total number of PIACs (governmental and private) identified
The number 148,054 PIACs would appear high, but the digital divide is so large that it is in fact a
small number given the size of the population still without access to ICTs. Table 18 shows the
population of these 14 countries without access to the Information Society:
Country Estimation of Total
Population 2005
Estimation Population
5 – 64 years 2005
Number of PIACs identified in 2005
Number of
PIACs identified for 2007
Population 5-64 years
Minus Internet
Users Argentina 38,592,000 31,388,000 28,401 30,202 25,234,397 Bolivia 9,427,000 7,734,000 884 904 7,384.000 Brazil 187,597,000 158,175,000 11,154 11,154 136,175,000 Chile 16,267,000 13,739,000 2,733 3,063 9,439,000 Colombia 42.888.592 38,950,000 6,078 6,098 34,899,757 Costa Rica 4,322,000 3,683,000 1,199 1,199 2,683,000 El Salvador 6,875,000 5,707,000 618 618 5,119,525 Ecuador 13,215,000 11,016,000 9,577 10,088 10,391,421 Guatemala 12,700,000 10,129,000 55 74 9,373,000 Mexico 106,147,000 89,693,000 58,188 60,213 75,656,525 Nicaragua 5,483,000 4,574,000 84 1,471 4,449,000 Paraguay 6,216,000 5,152,000 48 50 5.002,000 Peru 27,947,000 23,498,000 19,936 22,776 20,278.000 Uruguay 3,455,000 2,723,000 109 144 2,043,000
Total 484,282,000 406,161,000 139,064 148,054 348,127,625 Source: ECLAC
Table 18: Estimated number of inhabitants potentially served by PIACs and estimated population without ICT access
The data from this research shows that approximately 348,127,625 inhabitants do not have direct
access to ICTs, i.e., 72%. The digital divide remains very large.
With regard to the location of public centers examined in the sample of a total of 20,522 PIACs
identified in 2005, it may be seen that 71% are found in urban areas and only 29% in rural. In
view of these results, the challenge is to ensure that governmental initiatives reach the areas with
fewest services, which typically are rural areas.
56
The market has limits and does not reach large segments of the population located in remote, rural,
and also low income urban areas. In addressing this, two types of policies are employed:
− Universal Service policies, which seek to ensure that the cost of such services is with the
reach of individual users or specific groups.
− Universal Access policies, mainly through subsidization of part of the costs of access from
sites such as telephone kiosks or booths and/or Internet access centers.
Since Universal Access policies must take account of the remoteness and/or poverty of certain
areas, during the 1980s and 1990s, universal access funds emerged for rural and low income urban
areas.
Four models of governmental support for PIAC development and operation may be distinguished:
1 Public franchise. Here, the state, a company, or subsidized para-state partnership sponsor
the establishment and management of a series of telecenter franchises, providing financing
and services to franchise-holders. One example of this model is Panama’s Infoplazas
project.
2. Public concession. In this model, a public telecommunication company develops the
infrastructure and awards the management of service points to local entities. This is the
model used in Costa Rica (www.costarricense.com), since telecommunications is not
privatized in that country.
3. Telecommunication development funds for PIAC creation and maintenance. This is an
increasingly utilized model. In this scheme, a large subsidy is awarded for each project,
based on a public bid, to a company or consortium willing to manage (frequency as a
commercial franchise) a large number of service points for a specific period of time (e.g. 10
to 20 years). The award is made on the basis of the bid offering to provide the service for
the least subsidy. For example, the regulator OSIPTEL is utilizing its FITEL fund to extend
the PIAC network in Peru.
4. Community investment funds. In this model, numerous small subsidies are awarded to civil
society consortiums led by an NGO as a contribution to the investment required to establish
telecenters managed by the consortium. Winning bids will be those that meet feasibility
requirements and make parallel investment. For example, the Government of Canada has
promoted the establishment of 10,000 community access points based on this scheme, in
cooperation with civil society.
Through the ECLAC study “Centros de acceso público a las tecnologías de información y
comunicación en América Latina: características y desafíos” [PIACs in Latin America:
Characteristics and Challenges], it may be seen how the PIAC phenomenon in the region showed
signs of sustained and increasing growth in the period covered (1995-2007). Prospects for the
sustainability of this type of center are generally good, although additional research will be required
to establish this, considering that the PIAC concept involves certain non-public initiatives.
The results of this preliminary inventory include some surprises, such as the importance to PIACs of
satellite links. In general, it may be said that an average governmental PIAC has a link in the 128-
256 kbps range, provides four different services, among which training services and Internet access
57
predominate, an average of eight computers per center, and is located in an urban area. The study
also confirmed that there are many aspects of the PIAC phenomenon that may be of common
interest to public policymakers. Prospects for developing PIACs or the supply of training services
are fairly bright.
Some ECLAC recommendations to contribute to improving these types of initiatives in the region
are:
• To conduct more in-depth research of the linkages between PIACs and the contribution of
ICTs to human development.
• To monitor the evolution of PIACs by creating a regional roster of this type of center.
• To gain more in-depth knowledge of the PIAC phenomenon by means of qualitative
research to gain more detailed and disaggregated knowledge of the operation and
sustainability factors of this type of center.
• To study in greater depth the different types of government support for this type of
program, especially matters related to public and private sector skills in this area, and
determination of the market failure of private PIAC services and those initiatives receiving
partial public subsidies for their efforts.
• To study PIAC infrastructure in greater depth, and to examine possible proposals to
promote economies of scale that enable equipment procurement and average PIAC
connectivity costs to be reduced.
• To promote the exchange of experiences among connectivity agency management and to
seek more effective solutions in areas such as license administration and type of software.
• To study in greater depth statistics on personnel trained in PIAC management. To identify
their needs in order to provide better service to the public in terms of training.
• To compare training needs with existing supply in formal and informal educational systems.
• To establish regional organizations with competence in this area or to seek to create
networks and active regional partnerships among those with responsibility and other
professionals working in this sector.
• To review the possibility of establishing political agreements for public bidding at the
regional level for governmental PIACs, with transparency systems agreed at the regional
level. To examine in depth the costs of infrastructure, and of adaptation and/or
convergence with old ICTs, such as the telephone and radio, etc.
• To make greater efforts to coordinate and create networks through which resources and
knowledge are shared to ensure the sustainability of programs, such as the network
somos@telecentros for Latin America and the Caribbean.
• To train those with responsibility for PIAC programs in knowledge management and change
management to provide them with better tools for efficient management of the programs
for which they have responsibility.
• In view of the environment’s complexity and the wide array of services that the average
PIAC offers, to conduct both studies and research, and to address PIAC management,
taking a multidisciplinary approach.
58
Lastly, it must be borne in mind that the disappearance of a PIAC is not necessarily a sign of failure,
but could instead be a sign of prosperity, since it may indicate further development of the
community where it is located and, therefore, access to the new technologies on a more individual,
rather than collective, basis.
5.4. Accessibility and access to information and communication via information and communication technologies (ICTs)40
In the framework of the World Summits on the Information Society (WSIS), both Declarations41
and the Tunis Commitment42 emphasize the tremendous impact of ICTs on many aspects of life and
consider them an instrument for productivity, economic growth, job creation, good governance,
dialogue among individuals and nations, and enhancement of quality of life. In addition,
participation in the Information Society has been established as a right, which can only be asserted
through effective access to ICTs. By means of such access, individuals obtain information for use in
exercising their civic rights; communities become integrated into society, and regions may benefit,
since ICTs are input for any activity.
Lack of access to ICTs on equal terms is not only an obstacle to development but also constitutes a
factor that amplifies the social, educational, and economic divide. Accessibility means “[f]or the
telecommunications area, the usability of a product, service, environment or facility by the widest
possible range of users and especially users with disabilities.”43
The need for public policies for the promotion and implementation of services and solutions that
provide persons with disabilities with access to ICT services led, during the World
Telecommunication Development Conference, held in Doha, Qatar, in 2006, to the creation of an
ITU Development Sector Study Question on this topic. These types of strategies and policies insist
that ICTs must not be discriminatory and that persons with disabilities have a right to access them
on the same terms as the rest of the population.
To be noted among existing experiences in the region for the implementation of ICT programs and
services for persons with disabilities are:
• Argentina. The Tiflolibros experience (www.tiflolibros.com.ar), created in 1999, and which
now has over 20,000 books in Spanish and over 3,000 blind or visually impaired users in
America, Europe, and Asia.
• Ecuador. In 2006, the Army Higher Polytechnic School created the Information Technology,
Bibliographical, and Cultural Center for the blind, with over 28,000 digital books.
40 International Telecommunication Union - Telecommunication Development Bureau, ITU-D STUDY
GROUPS. Draft report on ICT accessibility for persons with disabilities. Alvarez, Clara Luz - Rapporteur on
Question 20/1. Dec. 14, 2007.
41 World Summit on the Information Society, Declaration of Principles, Building the Information
Society: a global challenge in the new Millennium, http://www.itu.int/wsis/docs/geneva/official/dop.html, Dec. 12, 2003.
42 World Summit on the Information Society, Tunis Commitment,
http://www.itu.int/wsis/docs2/tunis/off/7.html, Nov. 18, 2005.
59
• Brazil. Law 10098/2000 provides that websites must be accessible, making it possible for
the visually impaired to use voice activated software.
• Chile. Work is being done to establish provisions to ensure access to Internet content for
the blind, and access to television for the deaf.
Although such efforts are highly important to the extent that they recognize the right of persons
with disabilities to information and communication, greater commitment on the part of governments
and, especially, the ICT sector, is required to facilitate conditions for access to enable this
traditionally excluded group to exercise the above-mentioned rights and, in addition, to ensure that
legislative and regulatory provisions do not exist merely on paper, but rather truly represent the
development of specific strategies for access to ICTs by persons with disabilities.
The ITU Council has adopted for the 2008 World Telecommunication and Information Society Day
(May 17) the theme “Connecting Persons with Disabilities.”
Case of Colombia: For the Government of Colombia have attached priority to access to the benefits of information and communication technologies (ICTs) for the sensory impaired (visually impaired, hearing impaired, and visually/ hearing impaired). Therefore, for nearly a decade, the Ministry of Communications has developed projects for access and appropriate use of communications technologies to enable persons with disabilities to access them and to exercise the right to information and communication, thus promoting their active participation in different spaces for social interactions; and for the strengthening of democracy. To that end, efforts are being made to develop, adapt, and implement in the country’s different regions, technology access points to facilitate access by the sensory impaired population (visually or hearing impaired) to information and communication, social integration, and equal opportunity. Technologies implemented for persons with disabilities: The hearing impaired: Policies and provisions have been established so that the different channels (public, private, national, regional, or local) ensure the hearing impaired population, by means of different systems (closed captioning, subtitles, or sign language), access to public television. These provisions are being readjusted and it is expected that by 2008, a legal framework will be in place that ensures the deaf population of such access. Additionally, Public Telephony for the Hearing Impaired – Relay Center – has been established, under an agreement with TELEFÓNICA TELECOM, for communication between a deaf and a hearing person using text telephones, or access via chat with those who can write, and to communicate, via a communication bridge (a relay center operator), that converts written text into voice, and the reverse. Telephony for the deaf was implemented in December 2006, by means of a National Relay Center, with access from any Internet center (all municipalities have a Compartel Program telecenter). Additionally, the project has its own access network, composed of 217 computers and 21 text telephones (TTY), located at 100 points installed in 66 municipalities of 26 departments of Colombia and in Bogotá. The visually impaired: Technologies at public access sites (telecenters, schools for the blind, public libraries, institutions, user service points, universities, and “cajas de compensación” [agencies that issue different welfare benefit payments], with appropriate technologies so that the blind can use these sites to review texts (printed or spoken), use the computer or access the Internet for information consultation purposes, access their e-mail, or use them in any other way. The technologies implemented include: screen reader programs, Braille printers, computers,
43 ITU-T, Recommendation F.790 Telecommunications accessibility guidelines for older persons and
persons with disabilities, approved under the World Telecommunication Standardization Assembly Resolution 1 procedure on 17 November 2000, section 3.7.
60
hardware and software, and digital book readers. The visually/hearing impaired: By implementing IT classrooms in schools and family “cajas de compensación,” the “Connecting the Senses” project puts the world of technology within the reach of the visually/hearing impaired and their families, initially in Bogotá, Medellín, and Cali. In 2008, coverage will be expanded to Barranquilla, Cartagena, Pasto, and Bogotá.
61
6. ICT APPLICATIONS
The spectacular growth in computer use has raised our work efficiency by enabling different
applications to be introduced. Situations and experiences of countries on important aspects are
included.
6.1. Telehealth
This is a broad concept. Telemedicine may be defined as “distance medicine.” Among the more
specific definitions are:
The World Health Organization defines telemedicine as:
“… the delivery of e-health services, where distance is a critical factor, by all e-health
professionals using telecommunication technologies for the exchange of medical information for
diagnosis, treatment and prevention of diseases and injuries, research and evaluation, and for
continuing education of health care providers, all in the interests of advancing the health of
individuals and their communities.”
The American Telemedicine Association (ATA) defines telemedicine as:
“Telemedicine is the use of medical information exchanged from one site to another via
electronic communications to improve patients' health status.”
It can be seen from these definitions that telemedicine is a concept that involves the transmission of
medical information using telecommunication technologies, enabling medical professionals to
provide care at a distance, utilizing to that end medical equipment with special technologies that
receive patient information such as medical imaging, electrocardiograms, and vital signs, among
others, for transmission via different communications media to a diagnostic or monitoring center for
evaluation by a health professional.
Telemedicine involves the transmission of images (CAT, X-rays, magnetic resonance imaging),
videos (ultrasound scans, echograms), patient information, device signals such as
electrocardiograms and vital sign monitors.
The technology involved is telecommunications, image acquisition software, image transmission
protocols, video equipment, communications media, medical diagnostic or laboratory equipment,
with incorporated technologies for information transmission, equipment for gathering medical
information, typically of three types: text, diagnostic images, and signals. Any communication
medium may be used, although transmission speed is fundamental, since transmission of images
requires large bandwidth to maintain quality and continuity of transmissions in real time.
Much equipment, such as ultrasound, magnetic resonance, and computerized axial tomography,
already has technology that processes information in digital format to create images. This makes it
possible, using software, to capture or transfer data from the medical equipment to the computer,
for example, via software that utilizes the Digital and Imaging Communication in Medicine (DICOM)
protocol. This protocol is a standard recognized worldwide for the exchange of medical images that
makes it possible to store, print, and transmit them. In cases where there is no way to capture
digital information directly from the medical equipment, an image digitization system must be used.
62
Telemedicine may take place in real time or with time delay. In the first case, the patient receives
consultation by videoconference. He may also receive care from a hospital center through
monitoring of his vital signs, glycemic levels, electrocardiograms, etc. The second case involves
transmission of images for evaluation by a specialist, who may issue his diagnosis after analyzing
the results and evaluation.
Telemedicine applications may be analyzed from the standpoint of the services that can be provided
and associating them with traditional medical applications that consist of “face-to-face” care, where
the doctor attends the patient in person and conducts the examinations and laboratory tests to
obtain a diagnosis.
Medical care services to support diagnosis and medical care or consultation services are associated
with the telemedicine concept when the prefix “tele” is added to the service provided:
teleradiology, which is the transmission of radiological images for analysis by a specialist;
telesurgery, used in surgical procedures carried out using robots, which are manipulated remotely
by the surgeon; teledermatology, which makes it possible to diagnose and treat dermatological
problems remotely; telecardiology, the transmission of electrocardiograms, echocardiograms, etc.,
for analysis by specialists; monitoring and surveillance, which make possible remote care through
which the patient’s status can be monitored, as well as different vital functions, principally for those
with chronic diseases, and for postoperative and palliative care.
Another very widespread service is consultation of specialists for second opinions to obtain
specialized diagnostic criteria.
Case of Mexico: National e-Mexico System e-learning Providing, through the National e-Mexico System, new options for gaining access to education and training, encouraging learning as a means for the integral development of Mexicans, promoting the accessibility of education for all persons, respecting their identity and cultural environment. e-health Raising the level of well-being and health of society, by integrating a technological system with social content. Ensuring that all Mexicans can gain access to integral health information that contributes to human development and health sector institutions, dismantling the barriers to access to information and health services. e-economy Speeding up the process of development of the digital economy in businesses, especially micro, small and medium enterprises to enhance the competitiveness of the Mexican economy, as well as develop culture of digitalization in society, especially among consumers. e-science, technology and industry Integrating an information and knowledge society that has reached a greater degree of development on the basis of its own models and methodologies that have made it possible to meet the needs of Mexicans to build up their industry, with close ties to the research sector, achieving highly competitive quality standards on the global market. e-Government It is a medium for all Mexicans to exercise their right to be informed and gain access to federal, regional, state, and municipal services provided by the State through the Mega Network of the e-Mexico System. Likewise, the State, through the many instances of government, is fulfilling its obligation to guarantee access of the entire population to information and the use and development of its many public services.
63
Related to the patient care administrative process and achieving centralization of all services by
means of a repository of patient information is the electronic file, so that all results from the
different medical equipment are stored and available for consultation from any site.
Medical professionals also benefit, since it provides them with more streamlined access and
information exchange and improves response time, making diagnoses more accurate and more
quickly made.
Public health information is providing the public with general information regarding health topics,
such as nutrition, quality of life, care that should be taken depending on the illness, self-care, and
disease prevention.
Training and distance information for professionals is maintaining sources of knowledge for medical
professionals and paramedics which becomes continuing and refresher education at lower cost.
The technology involves in telemedicine may be generally summarized as:
• Telecommunications: communications networks for communication between different hospital
centers.
• Software for acquiring images from biomedical equipment: clinical laboratory, magnetic
resonance, radiology, ultrasound, and computerized axial tomography.
• Image transmission protocols. Medical equipment, such as CAT scans, X-ray, and resonance,
utilize protocols that enable images transferred by this equipment to be transferred to a digital
storage unit so that they can be accessed using any electronic file software.
• Video equipment. Digital cameras.
• Communications media: satellites, dedicated data lines, Integrated Services Digital Network
(ISDN) or conventional telephony.
• Biomedical diagnostic equipment in general: clinical laboratory, magnetic resonance, radiology,
ultrasound, computerized axial tomography, monitoring stations, electrocardiographs, vital sign
monitors, examining cameras, spirometers, glucometers, and others.
The American Telemedicine Association (ATA) provides a list of telemedicine providers on its
website: http://www.atmeda.org/news/buyersguide.htm.
BIREME
BIREME, a center of the Pan American Health Organizations (PAHO), represents a major effort in
the sector’s advancement toward telehealth. Its mission is to contribute to improving teaching,
research, and health care in the countries of Latin America and the Caribbean countries through the
establishment and coordination of the Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Information
System of the health professional community.
Its main objectives are to develop the administrative and operating capacity of national information
systems linking libraries and documentation centers; promote information products and services
based on the use of a common method and information technologies to enhance efficiency and
effectiveness in meeting information needs; establish ongoing control of scientific health production;
facilitate access to scientific information on health; and promote the exchange of experiences
among the system’s centers, at the national and international levels.
64
Country Website
Belize www.paho.org.bz
Costa Rica www.binasss.sa.cr
Guatemala www.medicina.usac.edu.gt/bvsgt
Honduras www.bvs.hn/html/es/collection.html
Nicaragua www.bvs.org.ni
Panama www.bvspanama.gob.pa
El Salvador www.bvs.edu.sv
Source: OSILAC with information from BIREME
www.bvsalud.org
Table 19: Virtual libraries on health in 2006
The WHO conducted a survey on the topic of telehealth from mid-2005 to 2006, in which 112
countries of 172 of its Member States participated. The table below summarizes the data, which
show that most participating countries have telehealth policies.
Member State Adoption of Telehealth
Policies 2005
Argentina yes
Bahamas yes
Belize yes
Brazil yes
Canada yes
Chile yes
Costa Rica no
Dominican Republic yes
El Salvador yes
Honduras no
Mexico yes
Panama yes
Paraguay no
Peru no
Surinam no
Venezuela yes
Source: WHO, 2005
Table 20: Adoption of telehealth policies in OAS countries in 2005
Of all applications examined, making available online health information to the general public was
that which achieved the highest percentage of success. International online publication services for
health professionals and university students have also expanded, and distance learning is planned.
65
Compared to other sectors, the low level of digital activity in the health sector in the Latin American
region was notable. The information available is scattered and incomplete. The websites of health
authorities are targeted more at dissemination ministerial information (health campaigns, links with
government agencies, statistics, and rules, regulations, and legislation in the area), leaving little
room for important health topics. See Figure.
Figure 21: Content of Ministry of Health websites in 2006
The survey conducted shows that developing countries particularly appreciate telehealth
applications, which indicates a need for such tools, but such countries need more support in these
areas.
6.2. Cyber government 44
The incorporation of technology in human processes has also made it possible to seek efficiency of
the state, which is approaching citizens with better attention in services, and more and better
dissemination of information, which facilitates resource management and provides new decision-
making mechanisms.
The United Nations, through its Division for Public Administration and Development Management,
has published the UN Global E-Government Readiness Report 2005: From E-government to E-
Inclusion, which provides an assessment of countries according to their e-government readiness
strategies and degree of e-inclusion.45 It classifies the 191 UN Member States in accordance with a
quantitative composite e-readiness index based on an assessment of public sector websites,46
telecommunication infrastructure, and human resource endowment.
44 Also known as electronic government or government online. 45 Defined as the interaction and the site that the government provides for citizens and makes
qualitative measurements of the quality and usefulness of the information and services a country
provides. 46 Categorized by their level of presence: emerging, consolidated, interactive, transactional, and
networked.
66
The rankings of the countries analyzed herein were taken from said study and are summarized
below:
# Country
1 United States
2 Canada
3 Chile
4 Mexico
5 Brazil
6 Argentina
7 Uruguay
8 Colombia
9 Venezuela
10 Peru
11 Jamaica
12 Barbados
13 Panama
14 Trinidad and Tobago
15 Bahamas
16 Costa Rica
17 Saint Kitts and Nevis
18 Santa Lucia
19 El Salvador
20 Dominican Republic
21 Bolivia
22 Antigua and Barbuda
23 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
24 Guyana
25 Ecuador
26 Grenada
27 Belize
28 Guatemala
29 Paraguay
30 Surinam
31 Nicaragua
32 Honduras
33 Dominica
Source: UN Global E-Government Readiness Report 2005
Table 21: E-government readiness rankings of CITEL countries in 2005
Chile maintained its lead position in the Latin American region in 2005 (it was the only countries in
the top 25 worldwide, ranking 22), followed by Mexico, Brazil, and Argentina. The United States
maintained its ranking and Canada ranked one position higher compared to the preceding year.
Venezuela, Costa Rica, and Bolivia ranked higher compared to the preceding report and the regional
average.
The countries whose rankings fell most were Belize, whose ranking fell by 21, and Guyana, whose
ranking fell by 18. On the other hand, Guatemala’s ranking was 11 higher compared to the
preceding year.
67
Cyber government development has increased in Latin America, in part as a result of the
deregulation of the telecommunication industry as an indirect consequence of privatization
processes.
The Caribbean country average is lower (0.4282) that the average of the rest of the Latin American
countries (0.4643), and still lower than the world average. Jamaica, Barbados, and Trinidad and
Tobago rank highest, but few countries improved their rankings.
6.3. E-learning
Education is the key for economic and social development, but tele-education is the key for bringing
this development to all parts, not merely urban areas and other more favored areas. The use of
information and communication technologies (ICTs) reduces costs and renders education no longer
dependent on distance. Tele-education may be considered as an expander of conventional education
methods.
CITEL drafted the Book on Tele-education in the Americas for the purpose of providing information
on the development of distance learning on the continent and to promote the access of teachers,
students, learning establishments and administrators to the use of new technologies applied to
distance education that can collaborate in drawing up new teaching methods and that would enable
better policymaking to help reduce inequality in the access to knowledge and the technological
divide in our Americas.
Among strong points of some countries are ICT learning centers, which facilitate training and
integration of their population into the digital era. The countries with this type of organization are:
Name Country
Instituto Nacional de Educación Técnica Argentina
TVE Council Barbados
Fundación Nacional para la Formación and Capacitación Laboral Bolivia
Serviço Nacional de Aprendizagem Comercial Brazil
Servicio Nacional de Capacitación and Empleo Chile
Servicio Nacional de Aprendizaje Colombia
Instituto Nacional de Aprendizaje Costa Rica
Servicio Ecuatoriano de Capacitación Profesional Ecuador
Instituto Salvadoreño de Formación Profesional El Salvador
Instituto Nacional de Formación Profesional Honduras
HEART NTA Jamaica
Instituto Nacional Tecnológico Nicaragua
Servicio Nacional de Promoción Profesional Paraguay
Servicio Nacional de Adiestramiento en Trabajo Industrial Peru
Instituto nacional de Formación Técnico Profesional Dominican Republic
Dirección Nacional de Empleo Uruguay
Instituto Nacional de Cooperación Educativa Venezuela
68
Source: OSILAC, 2005
Table 22: ICT learning centers in CITEL
RedCLARA
In taking up the research aspect of the subject, the case of the Latin American Cooperation of
Advanced Networks (CLARA) initiative must be mentioned. This initiative seeks to establish
infrastructure integrating Latin American advanced academic networks and to create a
nongovernmental organization representing the interests of this network of organizations.
The six main IP nodes of the RedCLARA IP trunk network are located in Sao Paulo (Brazil), Buenos
Aires (Argentina), Santiago (Chile), Panama City (Panama), Tijuana (Mexico) and Miami (United
States). From Brazil, RedCLARA links the Latin American national networks to GÉANT2 (Europe)
and to the East Coast of the United States. From Mexico, direct connection is established with the
U.S. Pacific Coast.
The countries now connected to RedCLARA are: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, El
Salvador, Guatemala, Mexico, Panama, Peru, Uruguay, and Venezuela.
69
Figure 22: RedCLARA topology map (April 2007)
6.4. Cybersecurity CITEL has recognized the central role of telecommunications in cybersecurity, and has created its
own work program to focus and coordinate technical standardization and regulatory issues
associated with developing a culture of cybersecurity in the region.
CITEL believes that ensuring the security of information systems is a priority matter for the
hemisphere, as information networks play an important part in the critical infrastructure of
countries, their economies, and societies. Accordingly, CITEL, through its alliances with the private
sector and its Work Plan for advanced network issues, especially cybersecurity in next generation
networks, is contributing substantially both to raising awareness about the critical issues that may
potentially impact the region and to enhancing its work plans in these areas, facilitating focused
discussions and information sharing.
70
In this regard, the Rapporteur Group on Cybersecurity & Critical Infrastructure of the Working
Group on Policy and Regulatory Considerations of the Permanent Consultative Committee I (PCC.I):
− Identified and coordinated standards and standardization tools to facilitate cybersecurity in
regional networks, through a strong partnership between government and members of
industry. In particular we point out the Standards Coordination Document Nr. 8: “SECURITY
ARCHITECTURE FOR THE INTERNET PROTOCOL”.
− Developing a Technical notebook for the use of the Member States of the Americas and its
relevant industry that identifies best practices regarding cybersecurity in regional
networks. This technical notebook will support the elaboration of appropriate tools for
raising awareness of the roles and responsibilities of stakeholders in regard to the operation
and use of ICT networks in the region; facilitate examination and assessment of the risks
involved; build consensus with respect to the responses required to secure these networks;
and assist in developing regional approaches and strategies that will increase the security of
and confidence in these ICT networks.
− Developing a Technical notebook on Critical Infrastructure Protection (CIP). There is a high
dependence of all society sectors on the telecommunication infrastructure that could be
damaged, destroyed, or disturbed by terrorist acts, natural disasters, thoughtlessness,
accidents, piracy, criminal activities and ill intentioned behaviors. The effective protection of
the critical infrastructures demands worldwide communication, coordination and
cooperation among all the interested parties and this technical notebook will provide best
lessons to assist in providing basic information and establishing a common platform for the
exchange of experiences, which would enhance all kind of collaborative work in this task
that is so difficult, not only due to the complexity of the systems, networks, and assets that
provide the essential services for our daily life, but also due to the high interdependence
amongst these infrastructures.
For this work, CITEL is liaising with other standards bodies, in particular the International
Telecommunication Union (ITU). Drawing upon the work of the ITU, CITEL is evaluating existing
technical recommendations to identify those most applicable to the needs of the Americas region.
To expedite this work, CITEL has conducted joint seminars with the ITU-T on the standardization
work and in particular on cybersecurity.
Recognizing the breadth and complexity of the cybersecurity challenge, CITEL supports an active
multi-disciplinary approach that pools its efforts with the efforts and expertise of the Inter-American
Committee against Terrorism (CICTE), and the Justice Ministers and Attorneys General of the
Americas (REMJA). The OAS has adopted a Comprehensive Inter-American Cybersecurity Strategy
to combat threats to citizens, economies, and essential services that cannot be addressed by a
single government or combated via a solitary discipline or practice. This Comprehensive Inter-
American Cybersecurity Strategy relies on the efforts and specialized knowledge of CICTE, CITEL,
and REMJA.
Taking into account the changing environment, it is important to provide training to persons of the
telecommunications sector and this is achieved through the program of fellowships on
telecommunications of CITEL. Based on the priorities established by the Member States, several
courses have been provided on security aspects and some courses are already scheduled for the
future.
71
7. CONNECTIVITY PROJECTS IN THE REGION
At the XVIII Meeting of CITEL’s Permanent Executive Committee (COM/CITEL), the regional project
on “Reducing the Digital Divide and Advancing the Information Society in the Americas” was
approved. The project’s objective is to assist selected municipalities in their transformation to
digital municipalities, bringing their citizens into digital culture, and integrating themselves into the
Information Society (IS) so that they can benefit from the opportunities it affords, and in
accordance with the principles arising from the Summit of the Americas, the OAS mandates, and the
Millennium Development Goals.
7.1. Connectivity projects of OAS in the Americas 47
CITEL, as a forum for the development of info-communications in the Americas region, must play a
major part in such efforts, its role being not merely advisory, but also carrying out on-site activities
or executing projects that genuinely assist efforts to bridge the digital divide and to include
populations in the Information Society.
CITEL must motivate and attract the private sector and nongovernmental organizations to
participate in such activities, negotiating and creating win-win situations, so that they contribute, in
the form of capital, experts and equipment, educational programs, etc., to the execution of
established projects.
The possibility of having CITEL expand its traditional activities to carry out actions directly on site is
being examined. At present, CITEL has two macro-activities, one adopted and in execution, and the
other being studied.
The activity that was adopted and is being executed is the regional project to bridge the digital
divide and incorporate populations in the IS. The general purpose of the project is to contribute
with the interested OAS member countries to their integration into the Information Society so that
they can take advantage of the opportunities offered by this Society and on the basis of the
principles set forth at the WSIS, the Summits of the Americas, OAS mandates, and the Millennium
Development Goals.
The activity under study is the establishment of a research and development center for practical
applications to be utilized by the different populations so that they can take advantage of the
benefits afforded by ICTs.
7.1.1. Regional project to bridge the digital divide and incorporate populations in the IS
CITEL has negotiated a cooperation agreement with the ITU for the two organizations to join forces
and efforts in support of the execution of this project
The specific objectives of this project are to provide technical assistance to those interested in the:
47 Although this report only provides a description of the status of ICT and the projects in the
region.
72
1. Design and preparation of training programs addressed to staff members and the general
public to enable a digital culture, in order to make intelligent use of ICTs and improve their
living conditions.
2. Design and preparation of central digital government development plans, for which each
country has made progress in different aspects. Each interested country shall define its
weak areas, which should be developed to complement efforts and applications already
carried out, with the possibility of evolving into “m-government” (mobile digital
government).
3. Design and preparation of local or rural community development plans, creating digital
municipalities or cities where the local e-government is complemented with distance
learning, telemedicine, e-commerce, development of micro-enterprises and SMEs, etc. with
the idea of evolving into a “local m – government”.
4. Design and preparation of development plans and installation of community telecenters
where basic telephone and data transmission facilities are available with Internet access
and where traditional electronic mail, chats and information search services are combined
with public education and training programs not only for using ICTs but in areas related to
the productive activities of the community. These community telecenters will have access to
the programs mentioned in point 3 corresponding to those fostered by the digital
municipalities (distance learning, tele-medicine, e-commerce, telecommuting possibilities
and poverty reduction, drug addiction and sexual exploitation programs , etc.).
In each case the development plans shall include not only feasibility studies but also master work
plans, the activities and responsible entities, the required budgets, potential financing sources and
actions for working jointly with the private sector, local or international financing entities, interested
NGOs, the telecommunications and ICT industry and any other stakeholder interested in
participating and implementing the plans.
It was decided to execute this regional project based on pilot projects replicable in interested
countries or groups of countries with similar problems, which join together to develop the project.
The first projects included in this regional project are in Costa Rica, Ecuador, and Uruguay. In
Annex 2 can be found detailed information about these projects.
7.1.2. Project to establish the ICT Application Research and Development Center
No matter how much infrastructure or access to Internet and broadband facilities there might be, it
is evident that positive development impacts cannot be achieved unless the necessary applications
are available and the population knows how to use them.
Major efforts for the development of applications are being made by public and private institutions
in the Region but they are scattered and are sometimes not well known and, of course, they are not
being used by many institutions that could, with a few simple adjustments, use them to gradually
increase the use of digital technology among the peoples of the Region.
73
What must first be done is to investigate and look for these useful applications to convert
municipalities into digital municipalities or digital towns as they are called in many places. Second,
other applications that cannot be found or used in the Region but that are necessary to carry out
actions in the field that improve the standards of living of our citizens must be drawn up and
developed. Everything that has been produced shall be used in the projects mentioned in the
preceding activity, as well as in other interested municipalities or institutions.
These activities are being proposed because they put CITEL directly in contact with the public to
tackle their real everyday problems.
Preparado por ing. Jaime Herrera – Oct 2007
OTHER POSSIBILITIES FOR ACTION IN THE FIELD
ICT APPLICATIONRESEARCH AND
DEVELOPMENT CENTER
Applications pertaining to municipalities (online services) that can be replicated with slight adjustments (local e-government.
Applications to educate the population in making intelligent use of Internet and the facilities that are being offered.
Useful applications for the rural population in line the activities of the zone (arts and crafts, agriculture, health, education and culture, etc.)
Applications to combat epidemics and drug use, reduce poverty, integrate marginalized persons into society, etc.
Figure 23: Framework of action of the project
The ICT Application Research and Development Center of CITEL, help interested institutions of OAS
member countries to install and adapt the ICT applications that are needed to convert the zones
involved into digitalized zones with the broad use of ICTs and Internet facilities. To do this, it must
investigate and obtain the applications that already exist and develop those that cannot be obtained
to meet the needs of municipalities, especially those in rural or marginal areas.
SPECIFIC GOALS:
1. Help install applications (obtained or developed by the center) pertaining to local or
municipal digital government so that all municipal services can be provided online, thus
converting the municipality into a digital municipality.
2. Help install applications (obtained or developed by the center) that are needed to educate
the target population in the intelligent use of Internet and applications that shall serve to
improve their quality of life.
74
3. Help install applications (obtained or developed by the center) that complement those for
municipal services and that are useful for the activities of the target area, such as
applications for SMEs associated with arts and crafts, farming, education and culture, etc.
4. Help install applications (obtained or developed by the center) that are needed to improve
the area’s social conditions, such as combating epidemics, reducing poverty, integrating
marginalized groups into society, etc.
5. Help install or use applications that the country’s government has developed as part of its
central digital government program and that might be difficult to apply in the involved area.
7.2. Plan of Action eLAC 2007 and eLAC2010 At the preparatory meetings for WSIS (May-June 2005), a regional action plan, eLAC 2007, was
adopted. Its fulfillment is monitored by a permanent regional intergovernmental mechanism, for
which ECLAC provides technical assistance.
Accordingly, in November 2005, representatives of Latin America and Caribbean governments
created a temporary regional mechanism and formed working groups on the topics of
telecommuting, alternative technologies, software, electronic government, creative and content
industries, financing, and legislative framework. Later, advanced networks, Internet governance,
and regional infrastructure were added.
For eLAC2007, the following thematic areas and 27 goals were proposed (with their respective
measures: a total of 70), to be finalized by the end of 2007. These are presented below, together
with their current status:
75
Table 23: Progress with eLAC 2007
Translation: Thematic area. Goal. Degree of progress. Progress. Strong progress. No progress.
Moderate progress. A. Access and digital inclusion: regional infrastructure, community centers,
online schools and libraries, online health centers, employment, local government, alternative
technologies. B. Capacity-building and knowledge: Training. Research and investigation
networks. Science and technology. Firms. Creative and content industries. Internet governance.
C. Public transparency and efficiency: Electronic government. Electronic education. Electronic
health. Disasters. Electronic justice. Environmental protection. Public information and cultural
heritage. D. Policy instruments: National Strategies. Financing. Universal access policies.
Legislative framework. Indicators and measurement. E. Enabling environment: World Summit
follow-up and implementation of eLAC 2007.
In the regional inventory of information and communication technology projects for Latin America
and the Caribbean,48 1,500 existing ICT-related projects in the region were identified. Figure 24
shows how they are distributed.
48 http://www.PROTIC.org
76
Source: ECLAC
Figure 24: Distribution of 1,541 ICT projects registered with PROTIC.org, by eLAC 2007 thematic area
We point out, for example, with regard to ICT applications and connectivity projects in the region,
that there are programs under way in Brazil that have achieved results that are motivating and
deserve to be highlighted, such as the work done by GESAC with respect to telecenters and the
Federal Government’s “Computer for All” program, in addition to several breakthroughs made by
Brazil in electronic government.
Finally, ECLAC, through its Observatory for the Information Society in Latin America and the
Caribbean. (OSILAC), was tasked with monitoring progress in the framework of said regional action
plan, from August 2006 to August 2007. OSILAC summarizes that, of the 27 eLAC 2007 goals for
action monitored, 15 show progress or even strong progress, while 12 show moderate or insufficient
progress.
The Second Ministerial Conference on the Information Society, held in San Salvador on March 6-8,
200849, approved the Plan of Action for the Information Society in Latin America and the Caribbean
(eLAC2010) as the second step in the eLAC process up to the year 2015.
The San Salvador Commitment 50 recognizes the importance of the work of regional public, private
and civil society agencies which contribute to the development of the information society in the
region and which, in so doing, cooperate with and contribute to the eLAC platform.
The eLAC2010 Plan of Action includes eighty-three (83) measures structured under six (6) chapters,
and activities of Working Groups on regional infrastructure, tele-work, alternative technologies,
software, education and research networks, creative and content industries, internet governance, e-
government, and financing and legislative frameworks.
49 www.elac2007.org.sv/en/index.php 50 http://www.elac2007.org.sv/en/docs/sansalvadorcommitment-8feb2008.pdf
77
CITEL, through the PCC.I Working Group on Development (WGD), may contribute to the eLAC
process, to the activities of the eLAC Working Groups and to the eLAC Plan of Action bearing in mind
its mandate and core competencies and the need to avoid duplication of efforts.
78
8. STRATEGIES TO INCREASE CONNECTIVITY AND TELECOMMUNICATION DEVELOPMENT
The present report has highlighted the major efforts and progress made in the region comprising
the member countries of CITEL, but at the same time clearly points out that an even greater effort
has to be made to improve the process of bridging the digital divide and to fully integrate
communities into the Information Society (IS).
It is evident that the region follows the world trend of fixed telephony, which because of basic
infrastructure and the cost of installation has come to a halt and is not expanding as rapidly and
with the volume that is needed. Therefore, these needs are being met by new wireless
technologies. Evidence of this can be found in the high growth of mobile telephony system, as well
as the recent penetration of the third generation that strives to universalize services to address
unmet basic connection needs. Other wireless technological solutions are also making rapid inroads
and are viewed as the solutions that shall help to bridge the digital divide. These strategies must
continue to be implemented not only in terms of policymaking for their development but also in
terms of the implementation of the services needed by the operators.
A primary factor that stands out even in the system to define the ICT opportunity index by the ITU
is education. Although it is certain that efforts are being made to introduce ICTs in education, the
culture of our communities has to be changed so that they can live and think in the framework of a
new digital culture. Educational programs have to be changed, greater efforts have to be made to
provide broadband connectivity with sufficient quality and terminal equipment to all primary and
secondary schools in the region, especially rural schools, and above all a giant effort is required to
train teachers and instructors, in addition to the development of computer applications for
education. The education factor is the principal factor that shall enhance the development of the
Information Society.
At the same time, another fundamental factor constraining reduction of the digital divide is access
of citizens to ICTs. There are two factors that must be considered, one in which the operator
companies must reach the areas with broadband connectivity, for which the countries must draw up
policies on how to do it. Nevertheless, this is not sufficient because in rural or economically
marginal areas, the public probably does not have the wherewithal to purchase computers or do not
feel the need to do so because they have never needed them or the price of service is too high.
One solution, whose world growth trend is evidence of its great success, is the installation of
telecenters (which go by different names depending on the country). Telecenters not only educate
the population on how to use ICTs but it also gives them the opportunity to obtain applications that
can enhance their own activities, whether agriculture, tourism, arts and crafts, or others. There are
solutions being proposed to provide citizens with this type of application, one of which CITEL itself is
examining, namely to create a research and development center for ICT applications that are useful
for the citizens of our region.
There are many factors that constitute constraints, and one of them is project funding, whether for
connectivity, education, or development of applications, among others. We believe this can be
resolved with the determinedness and transparent actions of governments and cooperation among
government institutions and private-sector enterprises to achieve “win-win” situations that are for
the benefit of all parties and that make it possible to implement projects that are needed to improve
the living conditions of the region’s citizens. This is in addition to the funds for universal access
required by law in many countries on the basis of the fees to be paid by the operators. These funds
79
have proven to be very effective in some cases, although a challenge in others because of the
regulations for their use, typical of a state bureaucracy that must also be upgraded to be able to
survive in our time, which is marked by rapid changes that must be responded to immediately.
Although it might seem utopian, an effort in education and cultural change must be made to raise
the awareness of private-sector activities, for the development of the country as a whole or at least
for the community where these companies are located and provide their services. There are
currently interesting manifestations of this type of activity where industrial or service companies
involve the citizens of their area and motivate and assist them to enhance their activities or else
organize small enterprises that give impetus to the area’s economy and finally also benefit from the
company that helps implement these actions. In these aspects, the government of each country, as
well as the laws and regulations under which private-sector activities operate, performs a
fundamental role. In particular, in the case of the telecommunication operators, the regulatory
agency, as well as the telecommunication laws and regulations of each country, plays an essential
role. The need to set regulations that promote interconnection and thus increase competition
between service providers is noteworthy.
Evidently technology is the factor facilitating solutions to give access and education to the entire
population of each one of the region’s countries and not only should traditional telecommunication
technologies be taken advantage of but also innovations should be made to provide solutions to be
able to give service in rural areas that are difficult to reach by nontraditional technologies. One of
the problems in many areas of our Region is the access to energy that would enable
telecommunication equipment to work. Nontraditional energy sources, such as solar energy, wind
energy, geothermal energy and other energy, would make it possible to install telecommunication
services in areas where there is not even any electricity service. This is becoming very popular in
some countries and includes obtaining small amounts of energy from garbage processing, sugar
cane waste, cattle manure, etc., and provides inputs for communication equipment. This involves
education and also cultural change, and it also requires a huge effort on the part of all, but
especially governments.
We understand that our region is vulnerable to many natural disasters. There are areas of intense
geological movement that can lead to disasters and emergencies. There are other areas exposed to
major flooding and torrential rainfall that can also damage infrastructure and the citizens of the
region that is affected. There are areas where devastating hurricanes appear regularly every year.
Telecommunications must play a primary and fundamental role in emergencies so that victims can
be rescued and helped immediately and even thousands of lives saved. In this regard, we believe
we are very weak in the region and that both government and the private sector must increase their
efforts to obtain a truly well organized and sound system for assistance in the case of disasters,
specifically with respect to contingency plans in telecommunication systems.
There must be monitoring of the progress of cybergovernment or digital government programs in
the countries, because they are the first initiatives that can produce a chain reaction toward the
development of an Information Society.
Finally, additional programs must be proposed so that the cost of computers will not become a
further constraint on access to Internet for the population, on the basis of initiatives that have been
successful in the CITEL region. Alongside this, solutions must also be proposed to ensure the
intelligent disposal of all kinds of electronic waste.
80
9. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
CITEL shall continue in the future to build up efforts being made to determine the status of ICTs in
the Americas, by measuring and weighting the causes that constrain or restrict access to the ICTs
that have already been identified, for the purpose of having the administrations and the region, as a
whole, spearhead and prioritize the efforts aimed at reducing the digital divide.
On the basis of this document, it is recommended that governments pledge and genuinely increase
their efforts in the following aspects:
• Guarantee that accessibility to telecommunication services is available throughout each
country’s territory, expanding the concept of universal access so that there will be access
not only to telephone service but also to Internet, television and other services.
• Promote among the member states an exchange of experiences about tariff matters and
the regulatory frameworks of telecommunication networks for the purpose of facilitating
integration and the interoperability of these networks.
• Study the development of next-generation services, especially supported by IP and their
impact on the Region of the Americas.
• Examine the security aspects of communication, government, and nongovernmental
networks, their role of supporting other critical infrastructure and local and regional
approaches that are required in the region of the Americas.
• Develop national and regional approaches to security of the networks, implementation
strategies, exchange of information and dissemination in the public and private sectors.
• Modify education systems so that citizens can be effectively integrated into the Information
Society (SI). This means modifying both the formal education programs (primary and
secondary schools, universities) and the informal education programs (training), which are
what enable the present productive citizen to adapt to change and to assimilate ICTs as
tools in their daily activities.
• Establish fast programs to provide primary and secondary schools with facilities to
guarantee access to broadband Internet and the availability of additional peripheral
equipment (computers, printers, scanners, and other peripheral devices).
• Establish and decisively support programs to install telecenters, supported by the provision
of useful applications for the activities of the area and for guiding and educating citizens to
use these applications. Education, disease and pest prevention, poverty abatement and the
fight against drug addiction, cultural entertainment, sports and other campaigns must take
place in these telecenters managed by specialized entities such as national health systems,
ministries of education, culture, sports, and tourism, and other government and private
stakeholders.
81
• Follow to the extent possible the standardized guidelines and requirements with respect to
the use and sharing established by CITEL frequency spectrum to achieve harmonization in
the use of the spectrum for fixed and mobile terrestrial radiocommunication services.
• Update national policies and lawmaking bearing in mind that the process of convergence
between networks and services is leading to a new scenario that requires consideration of
suitable regulatory conditions for dealing with different networks to the extent that
digitalization and computer technology make their use possible for various services.
• Enhance efforts to fund all activities that help reduce the digital divide, including the private
sector, both industrial and commercial, so that there are mutual benefits for the
participating partners, but that permit integral development of citizenry.
• Upgrade efforts to develop cultural change programs in the service industry and companies
to promote integral development actions in the communities of the areas of influence of
their activities, including training and convincing farmers, for example, to process their
waste to extract the energy they need to operate telecommunication facilities that would
help reduce the prevailing digital divide. Explore the use of alternative energy to solve
various problematic situations that, for lack of energy, prevent access to
telecommunications.
• Increase efforts to have preparedness plans to effectively tackle emergencies caused by
natural disasters that all countries of the region are vulnerable to.
• Create a consensus-based mechanism for annual monitoring of the progress of CITEL
countries in the adoption of information and communication technologies. The most
important indicators adopted worldwide, especially WTI and ICT-OI, as presented in this
document, must be used.
• Motivate the countries to introduce new technologies into the region in line with access and
universal service initiatives, including the consideration of initiatives for bringing down the
prices of computers.
We know that all governments, to some extent, have included in the framework of their
development policies all the above-mentioned policies and that efforts are being made in all of the
aspects listed above. We are convinced, however, that current efforts are not enough to
immediately meet existing needs so as to guarantee the region’s development and its integration
into the globalized world of IS, without the lags, if any, that might prevent it from benefiting from
the opportunities that are now emerging.
Some Administrations believe that CITEL should have a mandate to include local activities and
should be able to implement projects directly but to date there is no general agreement about the
matter. It is felt that this point requires further discussion inside CITEL, including a review of the
CITEL Statute and Regulations.
82
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. AHCIET. Indicadores para medir el grado de avance de la Sociedad de la Información. La situación actual en España. España. 2005.
2. ARIN. 2006 Annual Report. 3. Banco Mundial - ICT at a Glance 2005. 4. CEPAL. Centros de acceso público a las tecnologías de información y comunicación en
América Latina: características y desafíos. 2006. 5. CEPAL. Estrategias, programas y experiencias de superación de la brecha digital y
universalización del acceso a las nuevas tecnologías de información y comunicación (TIC). Un panorama regional. 2005.
6. CEPAL. NEWS LETTER N°3 Sociedad de la Información. Reflexiones finales sobre eLAC2007. 2007.
7. CEPAL. Políticas públicas para el desarrollo de sociedades de información en América Latina y el Caribe. 2005.
8. CEPAL-OSILAC. Monitoreo del eLAC2007: avances y estado actual del desarrollo de las Sociedades de la Información en América Latina y el Caribe. 2007.
9. CITEL Libro Azul: Políticas de Telecomunicaciones para las Américas. 2005. 10. CITEL. Carpeta Técnica ESTUDIO SOBRE ASPECTOS ECONÓMICOS DEL SERVICIO
UNIVERSAL. 2005 11. CITEL. Carpeta Técnica ESTUDIO SOBRE CARACTERISTICAS DE LA VOZ BASADAS EN
REDES QUE USAN IP 12. CITEL. El Servicio Universal en las Américas. 2000. 13. CITEL. Guía de implementación de radiodifusión de televisión terrenal digital. 2007. 14. CITEL. UIT. Teleducación en las Américas. 2001. 15. CITEL.UIT. OPS. Telesalud en las Américas. 2003. 16. DIRSI. Oportunidades Móviles: Asequibilidad de los servicios de telefonía móvil en
América Latina. 2007. 17. ITU (2007). Measuring ICT: The Global Status of ICT Indicators [online]:
<www.itu.int/ITU-D/ict/partnership/material/05-42742%20GLOBAL%20ICT.pdf>. 18. ITU (2007). World Information Society Report 2007 [online]. Geneva: ITU:
http://www.itu.int/osg/spu/publications/worldinformationsociety/2007/ 19. ITU. Acceso Universal en Latinoamérica: Situación y desafíos 2006. www.itu.int/ITU-
D/ict/statistics/material/Acceso_universal_2006.pdf 20. ITU. ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2007 database online:
http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/ict/publications/world/world.html 21. LACNIC. Reporte Anual 2006. 22. LACNIC. Sistema SIARI on line: http://www.lacnic.net/sp/siari.html 23. NRO. Internet Number Resource Status Report as of 30 Sep 2007. 24. REGULATEL. El reto de la telefonía móvil y el servicio Universal en América Latina.
Revista [email protected], Número 1. 25. REGULATEL. Programas de acceso universal de telecomunicaciones en América Latina:
Lecciones del pasado y recomendaciones para una nueva generación de programas de acceso universal para el Siglo XXI.
26. UIT - EL OJO EN LAS TIC 2007: www.itu.int/ITU-D/icteye/Default.aspx 27. United Nations. The digital divide report: ICT diffusion index 2005. 28. UNPAN. UN Global E-government Readiness Report 2005: From E-government to E-
inclusion. 2005. 29. World Bank .World Development Indicators. Washington, USA. 2007. 30. World Economic Forum. The Global Information Technology Report 2006–2007. 31. World Health Organization. Report of the WHO Global Observatory for eHealth - 2007.
Progress of Member States.
83
ACRONYMS
AHCIET: Asociación Iberoamericana de Centros de Investigación y Empresas de
Telecomunicaciones
ARIN: American Registry for Internet Numbers
CITEL: Inter-American Telecommunication Commission
DIRSI: Dialogo Regional sobre Sociedad de la Información
ITU: International Telecommunication Union
LACNIC: Latin American and Caribbean Internet Address Registry
NRO: Number Resource Organization
OCDE: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development
OAS: Organization of American States
REGULATEL: Foro Latinoamericano de Entes Reguladores de Telecomunicaciones
UN: United Nations
UNCTAD: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development
UNDESA: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs
UNDP: United Nations Development Program
UNPAN: United Nations in Public Administration and Finance
84
ANNEXES
ANNEX 1: Table of World Indicators
Figure 25: Comparison of the main international indicators in CITEL countries
With regard to the indicators, it is advisable to provide the following explanations. The degree of IS
development is based on indicators developed by certain international organizations:
1. Archibugi and Coco (ArCo)
2. ITU - Digital Access Index (DAI)51
3. ITU - Digital Opportunity Index (DOI)
4. ITU – ICT Opportunity Index (ICT-OI)
5. Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU) - E-readiness Index
6. UNDESA - Index of Knowledge Societies (IKS)
7. World Bank - ICT Index (WBICT)
8. World Bank Institute - Knowledge Economy Index (KEI)
9. World Economic Forum (WEF) - Network Readiness Index (NRI)
10. Orbicom - Infostates
11. UNDP - Technology Achievement Index (TAI)
12. UNCTAD - Index of ICT Diffusion
13. UNPAN – E-Readiness Index
14. IDC/World Times – Information Society Index (ISI)
Those most utilized are explained below:
51 Published for the first and only time in November 2003, based on 2003 data, it yielded many
surprises. It was not considered owing to the delay and problems that arose.
CITEL countries in synthetic indices
1
6
11
16
21
26
31
36
ATG ARG BHS BRB BLZ BOL BRA CAN CHL COL CRI DMA ECU SLV USA GRD GTM GUY HTI HND JAM MEX NIC PAN PRY PER DOM KNA LCA VCT SUR TTO URY VEN Countries
Relative position
WEF NRI América - 2006 ITU DOI - 2005/2006 ITU ICT-OI - 2005 WB KEI - 2007 EIU eReadiness -2007 IDC/WT ISI - 2006 UNCTAD ICTDI - 2004
85
KEI
Calculated for 128 countries and based on four aspects: economic incentive system, education,
innovation, and information and communications technologies.
NRI
Defined as the readiness of a country to participate in and benefit from ICT developments. It is
calculated based on three subindices that measure the environment, availability of agents, and use.
It included 104 countries.
E-Readiness Index
Measures the propensity of markets to implement Internet-based initiatives. Evaluates
technological infrastructure and general business creation environment, extent of adjustment to e-
business by customers and companies, social and cultural conditions, and the availability of
transport services. Included 65 countries.
ISI
Measures the degree of IS development in each country. Takes account of four aspects:
availability of computers and software, availability of communication networks, Internet use and e-
commerce, and societal aspects (education and availability of information). Covers 53 countries.
86
ANNEX 2: OAS Connectivity projects for the Americas
Pilot project for Costa Rica:
In compliance with COM/CITEL resolution (XVIII-06) that approved the proposal presented by Costa
Rica “Reducing the Digital Divide and Advancing the Information Society,” the Costa Rican Electricity
Institute (Instituto Costarricense de Electricidad—ICE) started up, in the first half of this year, a
series of activities aimed at implementing the above-mentioned Project, as a pilot plan in some of
the country’s municipalities, so that the experience would turn out to be as beneficial as possible for
the entire country and eventually useful for other member countries of CITEL.
Because the Government of the Republic has been implementing the “Digital Cities” Program,
entrusted to the Technical Secretariat of Digital Government (Secretaría Técnica de Gobierno
Digital—STGD), the Office for CITEL Affairs that was set up in the ICE to help the Chair of
COM/CITEL, who is the Executive President of this Institute, continues to coordinate actions with
this Secretariat as pertaining to public sector institutions, in order to make better use of available
resources.
The municipalities (cantons) were selected by the STGD, which as indicated is in charge of the
“Digital Cities” Program for the entire country, and in each one of them the CITEL project is starting
up in the respective capital of the canton, as well as the main city, that is, the largest urban center.
These cities are Santa María de Dota, San Marcos de Tarrazú, and San Pablo de León Cortés, from
the so-called Area of the Saints because of their names, and Grecia.
Area of the Saints
These municipalities belong to the province of San José and are located to the southwest of the city
of San José, the country’s capital; they are neighboring cities and their respective head towns are
close to each other. It is a region fully engaged in farming and livestock raising, where coffee
growing predominates, although over the past years other activities have emerged such as tourism,
thanks to the beauty of the scenery, microclimates, and the development of a sound road
infrastructure and health, education, banking, electric power and telecommunication services, and
opportunities for leisure activities.
One important aspect that merits highlighting is that the Area of the Saints already benefits from
experience in using information and communication technologies (ICTs), as it has taken major
strides in incorporating itself into the “Information Society.” Indeed, during the early years of the
present decade, it benefited from the Little Intelligent Communities (LINCOS) project, sponsored by
institutions such as MIT of Massachusetts, USA, and INCAE of Costa Rica. The total population of the
area amounts to 32,375 inhabitants, according to August 2001 data from the National Statistics and
Census Institute (Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos—INEC), broken down by canton as
follows:
Tarrazú 14,160
León Cortés 11,696
Dota 6,519
87
ICE has a total of 10,401 fixed phone lines installed to provide service to its customers in the area,
with broadband connectivity (ADSL) for 384 customers at present. It also provides a wide range of
mobile phone coverage.
Grecia
This canton, whose head town and main city bear the same name, is part of the province of Alajuela
and has a population of more than 65,119 inhabitants, according to data from INEC at August 2001.
It is extensively engaged in farming and industrial activities (coffee, sugarcane, including refined
sugar and alcohol, as well as other farm products). It has been recently characterized by growing
urban development.
The canton, including the central district, is comprised of a total of 8 administrative districts, of
which one of them, Rio Cuarto, is geographically removed from the other districts.
The area has a vast road infrastructure and health, education, banking, electricity, and
telecommunicatio0n services, as well as options for leisure.
ICE has a total of 19,976 lines installed that also serve surrounding administrative districts and
1,920 lines in line concentrators. Another switching center serves the district of Tacares with
capacity for 3,960 lines. To attend the needs of the Río Cuarto district, a switchboard has been set
up in Santa Rita with capacity for 1,440 lines, and in the Río Cuarto facility itself, a concentrator
with capacity for 768 lines. The infrastructure of the Advanced Internet Network (Red Avanzada de
Internet - RAI) consists of 1,292 ports installed in the switchboard in Grecia. There are another 320
ports installed in Tacares that have not yet been put on the market, and in Santa Rita de Río
Cuarto, 48 broadband ports have been installed.
The strategy consists of close coordination from the start with the STGD and unconditional two-way
communication for effects of analysis, planning, execution and evaluation of activities, some of
which have been and will be carried out jointly.
Another feature of the strategy consists of involving the principal leaders of the respective cities to
“take over their own project” so that it will not be viewed as yet another element of the policy of a
given national government, therefore subject to the ups and down of periodical changes of
administration. It is also relevant that these representations are the ones setting the requirements
and priorities regarding the application of ICTs on the basis of local needs within the framework of
the three major goals of the CITEL Project, namely: a) training, b) digital municipalities, and c)
community tele-centers.
Activities and results:
1. Coordination with the civil representative of this area for the project to be carried out, for
the purpose of obtaining basic information to start it up. A meeting was held with Mr.
Rodrigo Jiménez Robles, community leader, who supplied information of interest about the
region and offered logistic support for the following activity to be carried out in San Marcos
de Tarrazú.
2. Planning and organization of a workshop in this city in partnership with STGD. A kind of
joint invitation—ICE/CITEL-STGD-Area of the Saints—and the activities to be carried out
were agreed upon.
88
3. Holding the workshop to formalize and promote the work of defining the purposes and
scope of the Project Reducing the Digital Divide and Advancing the Information Society in
the Area of the Saints, under the responsibility of the leaders of the respective
communities. On Wednesday, July 18, the workshop was held, after presentations were
made by the ICE, the STGD, and the area’s representative. The respective commissions
were established to work on the topics of training, digital municipalities, access, health, and
security, and the activity concluded with remarks and questions, which highlighted the
evident interest of the local inhabitants in this project. The work of these teams is
continuing with the support from both the STGD and the ICE.
4. Coordination with the STGD for the subsequent activities, among which the workshop in
Grecia and the joint follow-up and evaluation plan. The workshop was held in Grecia on
August 6, 2007.
5. Agreement and preparation in partnership with STGD of the work schedule for the
development of the project in both areas.
6. Definition and formal establishment of the procedure for monitoring and evaluation actions.
Upcoming actions: Creation of the final project document utilizing the OAS format, including budget
definition and assistance required, which will be submitted to the COM/CITEL meeting to be held in
Costa Rica, in December 2007.
Pilot Project of Ecuador:
This project also is aligned with the approved goals for the Regional Project Citel-ITU, for this the
Administration of Ecuador does not require technical or economical support.
The project covers two of the objectives of the framework project, which are training and access of
rural areas to tele-centers.
The Fund for the Development of Telecommunications in Rural and Marginal Urban Areas (Fondo
para el Desarrollo de las Telecomunicaciones en Áreas Rurales y Urbano Marginales—FODETEL) is
aimed exclusively at funding projects that would make it possible to provide basic
telecommunication services in the rural and marginal urban areas of Ecuador; it is part of the
National Telecommunication Secretariat, which is in charge of implementing the National Universal
Service Plan.
The project being proposed has been included among the projects sponsored by this Fund. The
name of the project is Access to ICTs in localities on the northern border of the Republic of Ecuador.
Furthermore, with the installation of ICTs, new services shall be provided to the inhabitants of
border areas, thus contributing to the sustained and sustainable development of their inhabitants.
It is important to indicate that the FODETEL projects reckon with sustainable technical, legal, social,
and economic studies that make it possible to ensure the sustainable implementation of community
tele-centers, so that they will become permanent over time and exert an impact on social
development over the short, medium, and long term.
This project shall serve as practical model for the implementation of telecommunication services in
the approximately 30,000 other rural and marginal urban localities in the country that do not have
these services.
89
The general objective of subproject K3 from preliminary project K program of access to telephony
and internet for all in the republic of ecuador is to provide telecommunication services to 652 rural
localities along the northern border by implementing community tele-centers, in order to implement
telecommunication services in these areas, meet the demand for this basic service, and incorporate
ICTs for the benefit of the socioeconomic development of Ecuadorian society and contribute to the
area’s national security and public safety.
Promote the access to information and communication technologies (ICTs) for the most vulnerable
sectors, considering the advantages being offered today by telecommunication networks, thus
supporting their inhabitants to build up their development and cultural transformation in line with
comprehensive knowledge in a globalized world.
The specific objectives that the present preliminary project intends to achieve for the establishment
of tele-centers include the following, among others:
− Incorporate rural areas into the process of technical know-how and universality of
telecommunication services.
− Promote national integration.
− Contribute to the process of education and cultural dissemination.
− Build up, promote, and increase production, trade, and tourism in the various areas.
− Contribute to creating sources of employment.
− Raise the level of information and promote the development of information and
communication technologies.
− Gain access to computer and telecommunication equipment and services.
− Increase the capacity of communication with the outside world through Internet and the
use of e-mail.
− Generate a place for people to come together and social meetings so that the community
can exchange ideas and plan future community development projects.
− Strengthen control and security in border localities and contribute to reducing the rates of
violence.
− Build up teaching plans using distance learning programs.
− Using technology, enhance the development of teacher, parent, and society training and
teaching processes.
− Improve administrative processes of planning, implementation, follow-up, and evaluation of
national education plans.
− Create incentives and motivate Ecuadorian children to use communication and information
technologies.
The provinces along the country’s northern border with the neighboring Republic of Colombia: from
the coastal region, the province of Esmeraldas; from the sierra, the province of El Carchi; and from
the Amazon region, the province of Sucumbios. In these provinces, the cantons that were selected
90
are those that are directly on the border, and in these cantons, the parishes that were selected are
directly on the border: all the localities belonging to these border parishes were selected for
consideration in the present subproject.
The following table indicates the distribution of the 652 rural localities of the parishes on the
northern border, which currently does not have any telecommunication services and intends to
benefit from one community tele-center per locality, so as to provide telecommunication services to
45,109 inhabitants.
Province Localities % Population
CARCHI 252 38.65 20,018
ESMERALDAS 46 7.06 2,052
SUCUMBIOS 354 54.29 23,039
TOTAL 652 100.00 45,109
Pilot Project of Uruguay:
The project covers three of the objectives of the framework project, namely, training, digital
municipalities, and access of rural areas to tele-centers
the name of the project is URUGUAY DIGITAL COMMUNITIES PROGRAM. This Program develops a
series of pilot experiences in municipal administrations in the country’s interior as demonstrations
whose results could be extended to other cities or administrations also from the interior, on the
basis of the replication of successful solutions and experiences. The Program is comprised of the
modules of Structuring Solutions and Disseminating the Program, and the development of a specific
project for each Administration. Since early 2006, ANTEL is supporting this program.
In this framework, between January and August 2006, the first phase of the Digital Florida Project
was carried out, comprised of a connectivity solution for the Municipal Administration of Florida and
its Departmental Boards, the implementation of the Institutional Portal with online information and
transactions for the public, and the start-up of an Online File System in keeping with the objectives
of ensuring transparency and improving the management of this Administration.
Afterwards, the Municipal Administration of Canelones expressed its interest in participating in this
Program, requesting the inclusion of the same products and services implemented for the Municipal
Administration of Florida in its own informatics project, with the addition of new services to meet
the needs of its larger size, population, and complexity. This project (called “Digital Community of
Canaria”) is being implemented since December 2006, and it is expected that it shall conclude in
December 2007.
In the context of this Program, ANTEL intends to enter into cooperation agreements with three small
administrations from the country’s interior to develop digital community projects, giving priority in
its first phase to access and inclusion, decentralization and transparency, and institutional capacity
building of the community. Because various smaller cities or administrations are interested in the
Program although they do not have sufficient revenues to fund it, the projects must benefit from
financial assistance, as at present no funding has been secured.
91
The program is aimed at promoting and implementing the Information Society in local
environments.
SPECIFIC OBJECTIVE:
The structuring, implementation, and dissemination of value-added solutions based on the
incorporation of computer and connectivity services for the purpose of improving the level of
decentralization, achieving greater transparency in management, and increasing efficiency of every
community.
DIRECT AND INDIRECT BENEFICIARIES:
Municipalities, the public, municipal taxpayers, local boards, municipal employees, other State
agencies, tourists, nongovernmental organizations, Information Society Access Centers (Centros de
Acceso a la Sociedad de la Información—CASI), emigrants natives of the locality.
EXPECTED RESULTS:
In its first phase, the Program includes a project for the Implementation of the Digital Community
for each of the three administrations: connectivity, Intranet and portal with applications.
Technological infrastructure that enables the generation of transactions and electronic information.
A Portal that acts as an integrator of services and contents, from which various interactions are
carried out with the application of the systems of the Administration itself, as well as of other
entities, depending on the various types of cooperation. A documents management platform that
makes it possible to adopt digitally signed online resolutions and files.
The implementation of the model cannot be designed as a single process for the Administrations,
because each one starts out with its specific features and the construction depends on the context
in each case.
NEXT ACTIONS:
This project is progressing and, as part of the CITEL-ITU Regional Project, it has to be presented
using the OAS format, including the budget breakdown and the request for support addressed to
OAS through CITEL. As for the previous cases, it is hoped that the document shall be duly
completed and ready to be presented at COM/CITEL the next month of December 2007.
92
ANNEX 3: OAS Member States
COUNTRY ABBREVIATION
ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA ATG
ARGENTINA ARG
BAHAMAS BHS
BARBADOS BRB
BELIZE BLZ
BOLIVIA BOL
BRAZIL BRA
CANADÁ CAN
CHILE CHL
COLOMBIA COL
COSTA RICA CRI
DOMINICA (COMMONWEALTH OF) DMA
DOMINICAN REPUBLIC DOM
ECUADOR ECU
EL SALVADOR SLV
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA USA
GRENADA GRD
GUATEMALA GTM
GUYANA GUY
HAITI HTI
HONDURAS HND
JAMAICA JAM
MEXICO MEX
NICARAGUA NIC
PANAMA PAN
PARAGUAY PRY
PERÚ PER
SAINT KITTS AND NEVIS KNA
SAINT LUCIA LCA
SAINT VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES VCT
SURINAME SUR
TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO TTO
URUGUAY URY
VENEZUELA VEN
93
ANNEX 4: Links of Interest
Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (CEPAL/ECLAC)
http://www.cepal.org/socinfo/publicaciones
Monitoring eLAC 2007: Progress and current state of development of Latin American and Caribbean
Information Societies
http://www.eclac.org/socinfo/publicaciones/default.asp?idioma=IN
Measuring ICT; The Global Status of ICT Indicators
http://www.eclac.org/socinfo/osilac/indicadores/default.asp?idioma=IN
"Centros de acceso público a las tecnologías de información y comunicación en América Latina:
características y desafíos”
http://www.eclac.org/publicaciones/DesarrolloProductivo/8/LCW88/PrimeraParte.pdf
REGULATEL (Foro Latinoamericano de Entes Reguladores de Telecomunicaciones)
New Models for Universal Access in Latin America
http://www.regulatel.org/publica/publica.htm
International Telecommunication Union (UIT/ITU)
http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/ict/partnership/material/CoreICTIndicators.pdf
http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/ict/index.html http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/icteye/Default.aspx
Measuring the Information Society/ICT Opportunity Index and World Telecommunication / ICT
Indicators 2007
http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/ict/publications/ict-oi/2007/index.html
ICT Eye www.itu.int/ITU-D/icteye/Default.aspx
World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database 2007 (11th Edition)
http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/ict/publications/world/world.html
World Information Society Report
http://www.itu.int/osg/spu/publications/worldinformationsociety/2007/
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD)
http://new.unctad.org/default____575.aspx
http://new.unctad.org/upload/docs/The%20Global%20Status%20of%20ICT%20Indicators.pdf
94
World Bank
Global Information and Communication Technology Department (GICT) World Bank
Little Data Book on Information and Communication Technologies 2007
http://publications.worldbank.org/ecommerce/catalog/product?item_id=6366033