ORIG(NALIN TBEE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

STATE OF OHIO

Plaintiff- Appellee

Vs.

GREGORY WILLIS,

Defendant - Appellant.

On Appeal from the FranklinCounty Court of Appeals, TenthAppellate District

Court of AppealsCase No. 08AP-536

MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF JURISDICTIONOF APPELLANT GREGORY WILLIS

Gregory Willis #587358Lebanon Correctional InstitutionP.O. Box 56Lebanon, Ohio 45036

DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, PRO SE

Kimberly Bond373 South High StreetColumbus, Ohio 43215

COUNSEL FOR APPELLEE, STATE OF OHIO

OCT 15 2010

CLERK OFCaURTSUPREME COURT OF OHIO

OCT 15 2010

CLERK OF COURTSUPREME COURT OF OHIO

TABLE OF CONTENTS

^PAGES

Why C)4 ae Sho^id hec.r ^ ti^S ^^^C^ ^ra^r^Ule^k ^oC^^e^4 ^^ ivn

fti^ b^ ^!<S

a 3+& &u^16L

b4 d,^er I,'iCePage I

Statement of the Case and Faets Page ^

k 0i^w^P.^^^^ ^^^ed(aFirst Proposition of Law: g

skow(d- 10^ 2.^ vlci11y G^v^^O3L"2"c^

Second Proposition of Law:

44ve- CC7c^ 3TS G.....-{-y -^p ^ ^t /i„`` l .^ 2 I '3l

ll ^^/o Cd^. 3-f-S ( 1p

Page ro

,,Third Proposition of Law: w 4e1+Aei e, u^ ^ c.Y CQ pi-e.S e^4rj Page

a d4e,,.s,e--) aWc2 +t,r-- mpL,,IlG 3r ^r roLeSS ^d I°IY

4p Fuevy 0I.,foccv,

Fourth Propositionof Law: Page

a -2 g-}-)444 ^,t{^=^-^fe^ QSSJS^a^cc l^ (g^i1l}

Fifth Propositionof Law: Page ^

Sixth Proposition of Law: Page

Y ^'VC. ;sQl^r^'o a^r's+ 3 rCf'

Seventh Proposition of Law: ^^ f^,. ^ L e C u rn^ 1 R^ive Page

0.-^^CT c^e^ri v^S E7Ins v G/^/Z r.^S ^^

ot ^u ! 3' -^-r / ^ ^

Conclusion Page Va..

Certificate of Service Page 1OA,

Tti/ ^ (f at se- , ^ A

OA/O5 JLJe^rCL-( SYS^^ e.,J -Avkierl+ca,-L beAL^(cs (b,,l(

'AmeseGa.) ewC^ C-A4,Se-1 ^--+C)I G^^^ ^kr^cvl^y 7 ^LJ ,q C^

rc&3 -z%-LIe-I ero(vfe-wz, ProtrC ^1zaF CLBS Aq ue- h-e.-i-

V-tq '7'o^

f^9C", ^r^CIc3Sc^ 3 e Cr15f3 c^eu^.S{^ C 1^4 ,q^er^C^d ^Covrowr\ ^i • ^ ? ' „ J _Q

^J f'^ 31 u3^:$^dr'^'IG^S.s C 3'1S1$ G{'e,prlt^IviG ^^/o^i.h.S ^`UZ ^r0

^c^uSe Gv,cQ r^ue.5^i^^^^^)J ^^ fl7e. z7ew ^ol3 cY ba,^l^S ar^e.

CoiS2lv 1YJ'l/Jlei^le^7fv^ ^o St4ve ©7y (evreharrcl3'StoJ q c?xraS re.

^-P c^^,.^ le^c^erS^

^Qi^fy warr,ec^ o^ idev-f-icat i,->7prolorie4y, c^9i ll av/'oy'vi-Hy

aAvo.V,Nce.) or Cov ra5e ov S I^ C^^cl< a^cl Corre^^ ^

,,A Proof A4ope,-6z er-

AZ! rJ h4'

^^7^e^oqt ,RS ^^el/ crz ^uo^vec( i/t Cc5rre-C-Nt/ Jca^rnct^1ze^I•

TYIerZ10i-e^ JVl?q.I^/r+ql CPv1 CGrrIEGT^Oti.rv^.0.^ l// lS 4 CI2Gr'

v^ ^,l fG,^ f^eat ca^ rf1/^rc Asl^r 1/ OdnneI ^/9 (,tieo S^ 3c9 /l7

f2SS) a. CCnl-5o>^^^ Com^Qri^c^r-, c^ '^172. S2^t^^ tCfve^a

+r0.^SC.r/(o! V.S, ^'v12 SlqnEd GLc7" 1 n (o rre G^ ^,a

d

G 3^evt7 ev7 ^ry

0.3llil (r ^L 1Uo ^^^r ^ c^^ 1 vl̂ ,^ Ver>^^Y ^^ easi l,^ /loficeable abuse

CJ t G^lSCr^^/D v^ .^l7oC^r^ , q lY) ^^ ^^^i ^i l C6 u v7L) cC^7^vcse Cou tis¢ (^

^(̂ nz P^ b^! C !3^ t eh cCe r U^ e et J a,re o-9 +^ 1 S c)^cJ i° ca vL.S (':l ^AE. -

fh^roces5 V ^of a^ ^or,, A,`l^ qll qre. a bl<na' e-Ye +0

1.19CtA (olerYl4lZG;4lo, UT -ftleSe 4rac ,{.cle,7- ®fc4L-cr,-7,er7tS.

pr,5e^ oq-Lec^ue. -¢o ^^c=al Sho^.^(c^ b^ ^rcc^I^(^ e^S ^-l^^S C^tSe:

^.^ eXroSe-S Frank1s'^l Co .n4y, cc.d Oti./o PubliC, ^` ,

T^hc^s'S of+JC^. clJ^

Av-y,e,--A-d,-,e,v,-I- r fq',-k)Cor,¢I 3,r"S Comv an ^o^ea^ a,^ ^^Jpe/l^^e Co^r ^

Cor^a ^^turo V

WQ^C^ O^loS kial v^uscG+rne fS ^^r zr^fv,^ /^S oan

Ci-^-izci,.s (on.s-^'f -^cFf'oh^l r^^h-^s 7o ynake il/e9a( brcqdto t

Furfher) T^)6 Cccs e. PreSe rrl`S f7^^0 r f uv, i^ i/ G^t^O,^oo { et v ^

cJ-C

^45^-r•ib,.^.^l^o^, o^' -^'r.^^^k^r-•-,e,--l-aL -^' ,rr^esS atre h^re.. i^,

^2?S&V-^-ei'Ae_ vtvt^atJGr'cc6je, o^lvilnS ('eS (^ivq ^a^t

-fA,CT$ cic^e^uCecQ ^row^ CUevt^S ©CCc^^!nq QT TrJ14l

Ccar,s^^E^ ^z ^^,^^rr^iss ble bicr,S< 7-rJ/a.f a.,d r&xqfe^^ ue ^^ c(1SsJ^Cc^/S o4-' c1ee.0- Se^..-e.c^. Gtv)`{'^fGon3.5w1 j"c v) de3e^1

-,^ci^r ^uaQ^ O^^nG) trnrossabY^e. 1 ^^e ^ d U_5.)510 u,S.5`/O,

L7 7^Li^ /ectSD3Lab^^ ^cre( tn^ormec^ C!^ 12ev^.S ©i O^t/C)

d^t oin+ f(^a{ fLieS^ Se^e^. ^r^^5 ^^0 5 0^ ^q^J W^/^

preSe,I ecQ) b^^ ^ccSSecQ CSn fb ^^ ©ve^t^^^e/eMec^ F^c^ef4(

loub4-s oL--FO hios

^^1Ciar^/ cv^^ct^+ia^ ^Y J^eeJ In re /`7`Car^GeU 369 F 3d 1a.66

7-17e $'C Se-vevi f.vLte-7Lr? e,^

1.) ^r^ ^Vc^^v^d^^ll/ alre4^^/ qc^d^^ssec{ ^rrors) bL,+-

02,) Co1le-e4-ive---(y C(orlnc9fe lC0/luslo^

^^ ^^te+he_r- ^4^^e,ll^(-c ^^le (A-^^,R.' q^,lde^lnes ^rz e^ua(IY

C' 3t ^t^rc^c^ t 31 aat aJQell--4^^- d3 ^4-rciJc7.̀S ?

^J ^61^rher e,[^^t/ lC^tl27`^^ ^1^^ reT` is G 3t^iY7eoQ ^ Gz 3t 1 r^ r^ ^ti f y

IW^evi CSt?ec r^rL Ob^ec^ io cS eere 3 ^l^e a^eQ Cp^r Se )

3) Wbe4er' ('uleS ^4t Der^aJ , Tc

dc,^2,Sej cc^ ^L fGe CoU^^ulsorr n-^ceSS ar^(y f-o al/ 612ioJ4^`S^

e^^^c(ev

- ' ?0.SS ^S+ccr c^ o7^ Co ArSe ^^ram ^r^^rra ^ f^raNyh Se^s+e^C ire

5^(^^^f^^. ^v^.^ til dts+rfc+ ;^ o^^o re Q^^nJ^ zes cy/!:e,l(q.-^f-2

^ou^Se ^ ^at lr z^ ^^t^e Ca^©y a-ble. Clare-eS ccS av-1 ^u rc>r

+o be- co,-^s I^ oeJ n,-, 4^,e-

Cb 3i 3̂v^ ^^RC^ I.S° ('e^r,^i^-ec^ )^ ^ver^ {^hio G(/S°I^rJC+?

7J l^G,^f^^ ^ti^ ^u^^l^f3 J^ ^^^^ ^ ^^^^ dbU»us^urorS de-p 3 /vej (Any C)AJO C 3 ^3`z^ ci ^^ir ^ r 3 ^l^

TAPi ,(^c.^,l^frL ^rl/ ^J^ 3!`e^i-^ly rrl^^reS^ ^CJ 7ir^r{ C^^il

j ^ tYhe- To..e,c( ir) .^rca^. ^;{1 t.S Uktj

de.,ha+e. /rr,c^o) or l^ D^-,rc^ Clestvrs ue t+S ©a,.>vi ^.o^se

(,JherL ^rcc^.duleh&S r ^ -rroLLnda .I^-S Con-4t-I--t&+lc>r) a,/ ./

Arp&(/a^,f Gre^a ^ InJr llis SeekS f© prevqrl t'-l ct

r-20{- ju) l^ Y, a^d clat,,,-r o-P iV,e7qec41ue ebkVlsel (AffJ2,a.68)

ck,c2 l^te Se.,fe^c^ €^aS r1tnc t^oars (or<L^rre,,,^-(y

^'c^r ^taU CO^^^ S c^^ ^a^e> ^t ^k ^t^^ fe^rS -fo L^, r

-C LAA- 4e- y C,) vlt c.) ne Ctiti^f a-F P4 dna/'^tv,q.

is refu<^,:s+e-c( r

w r l̀lis JI^'^ ^^^^ 11c.2 d^^^^^^ 7c^ ^was T^"VLCct-^z 97

+T) fo^4-e r-4-!u^ ^vr4C ^ ^i ^1 l(^ ( ^ Go^ e l

4^kct_ /,4k-k,- Octs GOL

U GG^ Gct,LtJ24 (^hf ogrce, -^ bGu6//C. Qe-Ae-nC24e.=^ ha.c( ^ olCerl

c,J`llf's 44,,a4

^ I./rP_Vd^Vb^ dZG1^21^^ 44- t rl^'T^L'/S/l GZvaGi

l/S d7eciJI^^L fnia^^^PS, 7^^f ^ L-3Y I)lG

Cot 4 t 3a ^5" t,o^` Cav vr^c^J^ i-^ ^ f f^a ^Irs f

_ . _ -L ^ l! ^ a/zQ % ,^^lo f/ 1'`•d i s2@ ^i.T7 0.(YIY-GC 1 O ^-^.,r3w0^,(^ ..^si ^ ^ wr 7 t •

i.I^c LI 4 3 ^^ _S:

4-l^ o ^ I -2- o L-jl ^lr^6 ^S ^ ^ ^ ^ r w^^^ 3

® 5^/^ l^i1^a

6o

ct,i.tS'c> The C®ur + f av ou e^ ^h2.I ^ d 3!e3^J ^-.

A sL-L6se-^

h^.^w ^^ v^^ PiJ 1^w^° Ci0 ^^^^ ^3^l ^c^ 6^ 7^2 , f^'^^/ ^

S^, o^^-- b^ 44̂ - a, A,-¢c- ^^,4--f r? v rvvs Lr/!/l t

0^4e v^ ^ ^-^ ^ollo^- a ^ a^ w `e.-4

P^ d +f U n

V ^v^tEw^ ^6.Sl^ o z;^ O^ `vt t^

7,-U 74z:f L/ T^^^, o -^ 77!4^

r2, -^^ a®r }" Ae2.5 re.^^4-"^-^J

^._roc^^S

SdJ U^si 'J72.^ YL 4J 1 fN y^ ^ y

A VYweu^- ^ce^r w e q tcS

4c ^- i^ ^lts aSU f ^'^LePI

c, ^ ^ov ^s rs^^er^ ral^,fs

k'1 ^'lL'2 w^v 6 3 w(^^1^ ^S/^r^rv -iJ ^'owe ct 3Z e

LJL

^ ; it/r) 4o0A-(rPvLwi^,^ ^S$u^S; _ov --- ---

(i^ ^Y , L1 e^•^,c l ^S ^ L^ v^v ^ ^.^

Gv 6--/ co4W+

^'lo,eovv ^^ ir Soh 05AP -R

q

1n^. ^E^^IQlN6S ^ / 10

^

+ r 1 ^ ^{ o ^ ^ ^ ^i G3 r^w-^ ^s ^ ^-^ • ^ca C I v ^^ eJ ^ c^

ME rS 1'2Q4- e

agoS 3 +i°^-

^-^ f-nc,, K-L-5 cs.

^il^^^I d f -r qA^.s L ` 1, 1 ^ ^^ w i /lrs̀ ^ ^ ^ ^ ( o^ ^ .^? /-,

4-p-;1 ^ ^^

.5,

b, a

aZ::^o ^- ^ T-k-J l jR

4' a,f e-̂aif .tSo-o^ /6-^S 6 + egcw,----

w.I-^l< ^r-^!'e^v'r .^^ c.^^-^Ie^e^Q aLlec 3o`

^

A4- i^ii^C lr^^^ ^3llfJ'^^® t ^a

i .,d^s c.o^w

,4t^Is / -^ k^ ^ ^ 4LS)

EU ' C r .r u.v,.

^v^- ^c:^ ^

/^ L^ ^^l 9 /^t7 -^ ^S-I-^.^ V ^^''°^ ^ I-g--^/ ,^ rs i ts i.^ L . ^e3e

^_ ^}1 S^4--r-

di^^ e^^ o^ -^ C^^ 3^-se^d /7 ^j'n s^ a^' 9-7

C)

-t-+--e 1a"rOte.,,.

K- f,?-t O^v Ar^^ 3^fr N^^P

c v, 6r..^L^v,y 'fL_e- Cf^ r^ r^5

r/ pYJ2.1

°3i TrnP i ^^lr^ ^l{

vt -4r^u( -^ eJ l(

c^ ^i.L f o 6S^^Z.,O{/°3e

'

y-eC vf^P. doeS !/1o-1-C

r c^ fJ^` ^/^2J

d.-( j^rHS E ^ S e[^- dL

_ r&-C-,4K tl1 / I 1/'j V" I ^ /af ^

^ w3^ ln2^^ " ,^.- i,t.is^^ ^ r°'^'-- r0ul

wv o r^$ ^ f^i ^3e_^ ^ ^ l ( ^^ -^^ a^ ^C c^ ^ m ^. -, ! e^^rd^

^_c^^-^e^, h c^

c^i^,ow+u 'I l^n ^Le 54'1^6 /

/ ^

^ O^/ LC vL r^JT '°Zr C1 /

^ ^^ ^P 3 ^^C O^teGfTv^ ^'^/J 3^C Go^ 3fs

Lee- C c i 4-s-I--,

, A2

^^ ^id"3 ®^/'^

l F

^- 7 "•^C-. ^ ^ ° ` C C,w 3^ , GC! -3 6 P e,-c -

r `--7 f^./'3"'C. ^ -^3^,' ^ /^J>=-C Pt fti YC. Gl^^-^ ^i. GC Q w^'

^^jczc^ ALI 4-L-e-l/ ^^I-',O t0 U `J` ^ C632rYrU,,^ 664.- 1", 3,- e ^G^ .c^3^ o( S y

S-e-^ C^ '^- ^J> TiN ^G t S l ;,^ ( I,)^- W 5^_a .

E ( Gt,L-3

^ ^ ^,e,^G ^ Ci^t^^ dla^^^-- ^ ^^GL ^./^3 Ze^,^01 c^^v 5e ^'^ P 4 1-e- Gv2d ^CS_ ^'^^,

7"l-c Co"/--^;

a -<--

^^^^ 7^/ L^C^ CDt v7^'^C ® 3cro C° ^ ^/r°

Cil^s ka k Owdo

v `1 3^n...L- )r -I_lr +hen -

,^, G^/ lfrS 'r^a^-^ ^

p^l ot 7L^

n r^ wC ^ ^i ^^ Gt i 3 eS v,+-, S Ll LJ t^ W H-17ke-1W

v ^ 7Y ^^3 6 4L^-

O'n o-i'" Let LJ All9r Z^^ ^ve/, ^1( 3 ^2_

C^i^^^ ^ P^t ^0 1^ ^ 3d^ n //a ^ c_ Co ^c

l

gs^-^y ,^ 1^1i^r ,,- w ^ ^/`Ii^PL^^i `, , . - - -

-4-z:,.1ele,^% Le d i^ I d

I •a " ._St^c,^^ S^l^f /cs27 ..S

d efcl,L44-s ^ At-,^L4

C-43t- 6'

SL% - C) P,C^ !^ ^a-2,1l ^^^^^

t ^-77 s-t-^,4-e

s 4; 3 d

^e ^r wc2 ^-G ^{- G^ e ^ e rd e,-1 r` I-lq s evv JCt>

v a^J ® y-3 ccC ^U^'^..t-F_^ l e` t! 2..^' at R^ ^Y^^ ^

^^T T^ C`o e L v T ot t^ L^YC) 1- Y 6T/ /̂ ^ ^.

^"^^' `"I r.^ n r- ( (1 em.,L,--...^^ ` c^`7'^ f! ^^l° /^3 '7'3 'e^ /^-Gi7°^j

^6/! 0Tr J-^ ) -^^f t

^ 1 rn 7.v , .^r r^ 7'^ P ^D ^ t/ 1- ^{^T 3 i 1 3(Jfit,l/LLJ•c'/ o

^g r

^12 L^Q h ^ Tvt 0 t^i 7^ ^ e^

3

rC d^ GJ'^- ^^ ^

C),^

( G t,f-jOr 10Ci vt (l

ciknp^ alSo r)-?Y-4erioL^,

VF(Ov-, ? hZ beqlnvilel9

Q3 C-

Gi

ol%

p^e^, t ®^;l.r^^^^e^ -^© S^^-t w,Y co^^,J--l ^,,1,j) TLie- 4riek.l Cot-A r+

W6tS l ulCt 07 s^YJC?^^e^ ^Odt1^sl^ ^ w for ^ O ^ 3 1^^, ^l^

314' L.t / r^ ,/^ ^er 'LV llt'c.^°t_._

^irJC^c^ r o re.lJe,Je fGe SRme co ,^laJ^^d ^^' C'o^ ^selJ

^^eSC 3 t^J 3tq ^rSeUU23 y V4C>1c+rov^S CAs 6^k-i C)b^eGG^ bc.lt,^

Y) C^+ J (o 3,e ^^es4tov, is ci-54-d ea^eer oes

C Co v t^J 1a f^e^Q c^ J^ Co L^vASe-lot--?

./-k 4- cPe-FcviSe, co^ ,-,se,l -Pe.,

+LtGY{' IAe. co^fj Gz ^d k l 4 v6^Jerl 1^rose- V^`c L,c. l

ce3^+l^t^eo^. W^-^I^ ^ S'1^^,.^v.^`e0 -}-[/1 0.'^ t f'll-p-

Tk,.e- (}t^li+ ©vtce QGtrvti c.(se^ 3)04

Gor^c^L^ ^2t^er^ ^e 5SJ +^7e- Co^ ^ ^ SJ^cpv,zc( ^ ^v eo^re^

Jude^me^ ^vr^^^^ ^^rella f^ a,,d ^^J^^F co^^^el fuofG^

Y i,^-^ ro1^ei- .Se^fe.^eiiSS r^ G lar^iv ^O^ess C^ ^CJ olQ^foV,, T(-7^ rcf CoUe-s ^Ge f^i^l Co^.fs

^r^on by 6)Ct^/ g.^fe-lla^,f G^qrrfeoL -f-c^

re-(ieue- eo r Sc (^(^ 3(;^ as ^Pt'^o-F --^o o'eca.l l cc w"4^-?eSS

othSe,tc^ ^ neSS o n4 (ryoeJ4- wt^s 4o gz'^- de:-^e^S'e_ c

o; 4'^er-e).

v^rr lA^ ^+^^r / ^^L ^^o^7^lD G^e^/^/vh F^in^Gru^nlovS(^ ImrI^eS

7!33 ^CW;/1/.S qr[̂ r ceS 4-A4-71 Gie haS ^?oo^ ue.-

^tie a^l aa ( ^2 6 03 Ca^^ ^^.^ Jl^

7^ke- 1 v^rc,p, ^^C h u f f^lCa J J o^ c^ 4rta L alo^ w d-1-41

a l 1 -^'G^^se ^l/^rcp(^ S^v^^^ c^c^c u^a^^rf S^u.-l- ^l^/o J^,^ f f rce

^7^ec^,u2 ^rrcr{ or a^^aella^e co^ .se,l wo^ld Gfave^r^ue^^C^

o e^,/I /// a 1

'^ 3^l/fJ ^ vH't^ ^r^.G( (v^.G^q,M^7" E^'^Try' l?0"TJ^rUcftodt. '^R^2rt^7orh',v J J (

7"Ge-^^^ul^^^ve

C^^ f^eSe ^r^^^lceal G^vrors Gzo ld CDh.a

4d^lZen `^"^e{ 3- fvq^2^ ^ a 7^rr ^v-(^ ^.

/ lGZrCO( lqa /) ^l lJ!?dC^ ..^^ ^^ /"lGc^-^-^D^-^ ^eY3'ml^Ss

Crv-orS^ Cov,^S^ct^re^ ^oqe ^G er^ CQ^, c^o ^hel T/ JCk,

V^^lh ^vror 5 C^ea ^ YeJecJrS^^ lS e-erc^.

^(^Q 1^ ^o ^^^ v i S Sb GFC a^ Y/o cJ d/J f' + 5e-7- 4o 7 Lr JS

%evelU?

`^iyy/2, ^^^ella^^ Gtc^S ^^^^C^/uef.l ^JSSe^Q ^ve y Gl^(lh e,

^^ier^^o^eJ OAL, Cad, ^eG 1n"^/r^llr lbve,-look

J l/ (/.s /^ O/^ ^^ l Qn6rCC^C^ O f T^ f ^ J !> ! ^©

(XC uS2,^r Ve ^ ^ 4eS {f ru^ ^^ e ^Jeo^Jl2 0^ ^G^S ^ ekT

/^l\ wa v+ 4b CC oe^ ^s rC^oes kno ^fedd^e o^'

ocE^}k

c^ 1 ` rp-E- V, L^ f o^ ConSc ien ee..^ J^7-1/1^

p^61iG ^^^Gk ec^e Ca be_ ave^ed,

! l ze ^3bSe ^ ^ ier t r J E l/ ( C^^ o, o-0 ^ i^ /e l?eCa^Se

1 ^ ^r^ / Ce^Src^e^a ^lu^ o^ -kG,e- a_S c^o^e^ }he

-^JL ^^posl4-iovro^vy-i ,O

V^-f ^r ^i v^ ti S

^a Se ^/u^ber o201©-/59 a //'/ofau^ ^o- c(e(c^^ec^ ^4^^^u^^ eJHic6,

/5 R lSa ^e_-^or^ ^o^-. r^ o?. I^en `fHeSe ^.SS'^^^ Cov^lcQ

S I il1 ^ -sed by 4- A,'s C6^,-^ Ohio c^^ f^0 oVAJJ

be4ore i-^ ^ce ^jS o v-, et.S, `;TA Fo kYo fA .

P^3e^ t^,

l..ov.S^7 w+,ov G ^ ^^ J vs ' 3^ cgi!, Gt f^^CSv ^

0 CD^ ^bl/C r ore-aT e- 3q

i ^^ _ir,^ ^reS^ ^GUJziJ SI-70a• L k^` 434^fec,^

n . v

^

P

4 i V

31 ®V^

^

.

,}I

^^U 3 r ^F^1^ J

rI s d l`aL.,

1 t l^/ S 7-'toS ,7 e.e v-, Ser^ ve^ 'Dv L' 5. I . C 1,,, A

^^,^11(Z

Gl-^^/^/,^P^^ ^^

Attachment not scanned

5 69 92 - V71 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, FRANKI-IN COUNTY, OHIOCRIMINAL DiVISION

State of Ohio

vs.Plaintiff,

Case No. O 76" 3 5//

Defendant. . Judge

NOTICE1 ^ (Prison Imposed) m z^ z,

The Court hereby notifies the Defendant as follows,

Post-Re(eacc Control.

^ x..:c -e

b tD -_44

C7 ^ .J b LU GG+

After you arc released from prison, you (will,mW have a period of post-release control for ars iMwtngyour release from prtsQn. If you violate post-release control sanctions tmposed upon you, uny one Spmora ot thefollowing may result;

(] ) The Parole Board may tmpose a more restrictive post-release control sanction upon you and

(2) The Parole Board may increase the duratton ofthe post-reicase contmi subject to a specifiedmaxtmum;and

(3) The more restrtcttve sanction that the Parole Board ntav tmposc may const¢t of a prison teren,provided that the prison term cannot exceed nine months and the maxtmum cumuiattve prison termso unposed for all violations during the period of post-release control cannot exceed one-half of thestated prison tetm ortgmally imposed upon you; and

(4) If the violation ofthc sanction ts a felcmy, you may be prosecuted for the fclony and, in addttton toany sentence it imposes on you lor the new felony, the Court may impose a prtson-term, subject to aspecified maximum, for the violation

I hereby certify that the Court read to me, and guve me in wrtttng, the noucc set fonh herein

^

- t - YDate

writing, the notice set fortlt withinthe Judge read to the Dctendant, and gave (htm,ff-0 tnAs the attorney for the Defendant. 1 hereby cert+ty that

Prosecuting Attomey ^ Defendant' s Attomey

-Note•[F-1 and fclony sex offenders-mandatory 5 yean;, F-2 and i'-3 with barm, mandatory 3 years, other F-3. F-4,1'-5 not ntandatory.

up to 3 years] (revised a-10-00)

I i '~:.t6992 - V72

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIOCRIMINAL DIVISION

STATE OF OHIO,

Plaintiff,

V.

GREGORY S. WILLIS,

Defendant.

Case No. 07CR-05-3571 r

Judge SCHNEIDER

JUDGMENT ENTRY(Prison Imposed)

rnEi

O

C70c

=iCA

C.

NtD

On Aprd 7, 2008, the State of Ohio was represented by Prosecuting AttomeyWilliam Davies and the Defendant was represented by attorney M. Catherine Kunia. Thecase was tried by a jury which retumed a verdict on April 10, 2008, finding the Defendantguilty of the foliowing• Count One of the indictrnent, to wit. RAPE, in vioiation of Section2907.02 of the Ohio Revised Code, being a Felony of the First Degree; guilty of CountTwo of the Indictment, to wit: RAPE, in violation of Section 2907.02 of the Ohio RevisedCode, being a Felony of the First Degree; and guilty to Count Three of the Indictment, towit: KIDNAPPING, in violation of Section 2905.01 of the Ohio Revised Code, being aFelony of the First Degree. Counts Four and Five were not tried at this time.

On Aprii 10, 2008, the Defendant was informed of the aforestated verdict and theCourt ordered a pre-sentence investigation.

In addition, the Court finds the Defendant to be a sexual offender andclassified pursuant to S.B. 10 as a Tier iit with registration dutles to last a iifetime; inperson veri8cation is required every ninety (90) days and community notificationwill be sent.

On May 28, 2008, a sentencing hearing was held pursuant to R.C. 2929.19 TheState of Ohio was represented by Assistant Prosecuting Attorney William Davies, andthe Defendant was represented by attomey M. Catherine Kurila The Defendant wasinformed of his appellate review rights pursuant to Crim R. 32.

The Court afforded counsel an opportunity to speak on behaff of the Defendant andaddressed the Defendant personally affording him an opportunity to make a statement onhis own behalf in the form of mitigation and to present infonnation regarding the existenceor non-existence of the factors the Court has considered and weighed.

The Court has considered the putposes and principies of sentencing set forth inR.C. 2929 11 and the factors set forth in R.C. 2929.12. In addition, the Court has weighedthe factors as set forth in the applicable provisions of R C. 2929 13 and R C 2929 14. TheCourt further finds that a prison term is mandatory pursuant to R.C. 292913(F).

14.N

d6^92 - V73

The Court hereby imposes the following sentence: NINE (9) YEARS AS TOCOUNT ONE; NINE (9) YEARS AS TO COUNT TWO; NINE (9) YEARS AS TO COUNTTHREE. COUNTS ONE AND TWO ARE TO BE SERVED CONCURRENTLY WITHEACH OTHER BUT CONSECUTIVELY TO COUNT THREE FOR A TOTAL OFEIGHTEEN (18) YEARS TO BE SERVED AT THE OHIO DEPARTMENT OFREHABILITATION AND CORRECTIONS.

After imposing sentence, the Court stated its reasons as required by R.C.2929.19 and consistent with State v. Foster, 2006-Ohio-856.

The total fine and financial sanction judgment is $ -0-. Defendant shall pay courtcosts. Fine is waived.

After the imposition of sentence, the Court notffied the Defendant, orally and inwriting, of the applicable period of five (5) years mandatory post-release control pursuantto R.C. 2929.19(B)(3)(c), (d) and (e)

The Court finds that the Defendant has Three Hundred Eighty Five (385) days of

jail credit and hereby certifies the time to the Ohio Department of Corrections The

Defendant is to receive jail time credit for all additional jail time served while awaitingtransportation to the institution from the date of the imposition of this sentence.

CHARLES A. SCHN IDER, JUDGE

cc• Prosecuting AttomeyDefendanYs Attorney

2

20680 - M18

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO

TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

State of Ohio,

F^^ cprr•:^^ .,:.. ..^^ S

w..1 I.R. ' 1+

^.... 12 ti„IJ' 42

. . ,l7 L^ -^- -u- itTS

Plaintiff-Appellee,

V. No. OBAP-536

Gmgory S. Willis, (REGULAR CALENDAR)

Defendant-Appellant.

JOURNAL ENTRY

This court is not convinced that appellant has filed an App.R. 26(B)

motion. Aoeoniingly, appelianCs March 8, 2010 motion Is denied.

^Judge G. Gary ack,.J.

++=Lui. t. I

_HP f'1 '-1^._^ 'j..:^

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO

TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

State of Ohio,

Plaintiff-Appe(lee,

V.

Gregory Willis,

Defendant-Appellant.

i 'o" JU1.27 PM 2: 10

CLERK Gr' COURTS

No. 08AP-536(C.P.C. No. 07CR-05-3571)

(REGULAR CALENDAR)

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Rendered on July 27, 2010

Ron O'Brien, Prosecuting Attorney, and Kimberiy Bond, forappellee.

Gregory Willis, pro se.

ON APPLICATION FOR REOPENING

TYACK, P.J.

(lit) Gregory Willis has filed a document entitled "Delayed Application for

Reopening of Appeal - App.R. 26(B) " Applications for reopening under App.R. 26(B)

must be filed within 90 days of the journalization of the appellate judgment. The appellate

judgment in Willis' case was joumalized on January 27, 2009.

20703 - W34

Nos. OBAP-536 2

{¶2} Willis did not file his application for reopening until April 16, 2010. Thus,

Willis was almost a year past the time allotted for his filing. App.R. 26(B) allows a late

filing when the applicant shows good cause for a filing at a later time.

{$3) Willis argues that he has good cause for filing his applicaYGon for reopening

almost a year late. However, on April 9, 2009, Willis filed a motion for extension of time to

file an App.R. 26(B) motion. This was followed by several other such motions. On

September B. 2009, the last of these motions were denied. A previous such motion filed

August 4, 2009 was denied by a three-judge panel of this court (Tyack, French and

McGrath) on August 12, 2009.

{14} In accord with the previous rulings of this court, Willis has not demonstrated

a valid reason for the extensive delays in filing his App.R. 26(B) motion for reopening.

{¶5} The App.R. 26(B) application for reopening is therefore denied as being

untimely.

Application for reopening denied.

FRENCH and McGRATH, JJ., concur.

910

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO

TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

State of Ohio,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

V.

Gregory Willis,

Defendant-Appellant.

2010 SEP -2 PH 3: ! 2

CLERK OF CCi;R FS

No. 08AP-536(C.P.C. No. 07CR-05-3571)

(REGULAR CALENDAR)

JOURNAL ENTRY

For the reasons stated in the memorandum decision of this court rendered

herein on September 2, 2010, it is the order of this court that appellant's application for

reconsideration is denied.

TYACK, P.J., FRENCH & McGRATH, JJ.

al

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO

TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

State of Ohio,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

V.

Gregory Willis,

Defendant-Appellant.

1:`tl

?'`fi SFP -2 PH12: 17

C!.£Rii OF COURE-S

No. 08AP-536(C.P:C. No. 07CR-05-3571)

(REGULAR CALENDAR)

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Rendered on September 2, 2010

Ron O'Brien, Prosecuting Attorney, and Kimberly Bond, for

appellee.

Gregory Willis, pro se.

ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

TYACK, P.J.

{11} Gregory Willis has filed a document entitled "App.R. 25(A)-Motion for

Reconsideration."

{12} The judgment on Willis's original appeal was joumalized on January 27,

2009. He filed an application for reopening under App.R. 26(B) on Apri1 16, 2010. That

application was denied as being untimely on July 27, 2010.

No. 08AP-536 2 ';),

{113j On August 11, 2010, Willis filed the present "motion," more properly called

an application for reconsideration. App.R. 26 requires that applications for

reconsideration be filed within ten days of the judgment entry being joumalized. Willis did

not file his "motion"/application for reconsideration within the time permitted by the Ohio

Rules of Appellate Procedure. The mofion, treated as an application for reconsideration,

is denied.

Application torreconsideration c3enied.

FRENCH and McGRATH, JJ., concur.