ornl dynamic wireless power demonstration with electrochemical · 2015-03-30 · •gem vehicle...
TRANSCRIPT
ORNL Dynamic Wireless Power Transfer System Demonstration with Electrochemical Energy Buffers
Omer C. Onar, S. Campbell, C. P. White, C. Coomer, L. Seiber, M. Chinthavali, P. T. Jones, and J. M. Miller Power Electronics and Electric Machinery Group Oak Ridge National Laboratory
February 09, 2015, Panel Session #5
2 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
Outline
• Introduction and hardware system description
• Elements of wireless power transfer (WPT) system control
• Case study of ORNL’s in-motion WPT • Vehicle and grid side power
smoothing with electrochemical energy buffers
• Experimental test results
3 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
Introduction and System Description • Overall system functional block diagram • 5 cascaded power conversion stages, ensuring safety and
control flexibility
WPT coil set (Coupler)
4 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
Elements of WPT System Control • Inverter duty cycle, d, pulse width modulation,
• Voltage control, Udc, with active front-end rectifier with power factor correction,
• Frequency control for reactive power minimization due to load (battery SOC), gap (z), and misalignment changes.
𝑈𝑑𝑜 =𝜋
2√2|𝑈𝑠| + 𝑟𝑝 𝑖𝑝 + 𝑈𝑠𝑤
𝑃𝐹 = cos arg(𝑈𝑠) − arg(𝑖𝑝)
acU Front End Grid Interface
Converter
1T
2T 4T
+
-
doU1G
2G
3G
4G
sU
1C
1L 2L
M
2C oC
oU1I 2I +
-
bU bI3T
doI
2D
1D 3D
4D
HF InverterPrimary and
Secondary Coils
Bridge Rectifier & Filter
𝑈𝑠(𝑡) =4𝑈𝑑𝑜
𝜋 sin 𝑑𝜋2 cos(𝜔𝑡) (𝑉𝑟𝑚𝑠 )
5 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
Case Study of ORNL’s In-motion WPT
● Initial 2-coil track, upgraded to 6-coil track for internal funded in-motion wireless charging system
● System uses a Zylinx ZP24D-250RM 2.4GHz Radio Modem and optical sensors for communications and relative vehicle position determination.
2nd transmit
coil
1st transmit
coil
Receivecoil
acUActive Front End (AFE)
and PF Comp.
1T
2T 4T
+
-
doU1G
2G
3G
4G
sU
1TC1TL
RC
oC
oU
1I
RI
bU
bI
3T
HF Power Converter &Primary Pad
Secondary Coil, Rectifier, and
Filter to BatteryUb, Ib feedbacks,
BMS messages, fault, and status via DSRC
Ub, Ib feedbacks, BMS data commands to HF inverter,
other sensor inputs, and V2I communication with grid
Switching Frequency and Duty
Cycle Control
doI
2D
1D 3D
4D
G1 G2 G3 G4
Ub
Ib
Udo
Ido
2TC
+
-
6 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
Case Study of ORNL’s In-motion WPT • Definition of vehicle secondary coil relative to track coils
7 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
Case Study of ORNL’s In-motion WPT
“up” field
“down” field
8 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
Case Study of ORNL’s In-motion WPT
● Active power variation over the track when vehicle is moving.
● Reactive power variation over the track when vehicle is moving.
● DC-to-DC and coil-to-coil efficiency when vehicle is moving.
● Drastic reversals of power flows during vehicle pass-over.
9 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
Case Study of ORNL’s In-motion WPT
● High reactive power content of inverter output.
● Waveforms for positions #1 (left) and #9 (right) – right before alignment and right after alignment (vehicle goes over duel coils)
2nd transmit
coil
1st transmit
coil
Receivecoil
Receivecoil
● Waveforms for positions #3 (left) and #7 (right) – Perfectly aligned with first and second coils.
Receivecoil
Receivecoil
● Higher coupling factor, less magnetizing current, more active power content of inverter output.
10 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
Case Study of ORNL’s In-motion WPT
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 90
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
Driver side front tireFloor boardDriver seatHead rest
Position #
Elec
trom
agne
tic F
ield
(Hig
hest
Pea
k) [μ
T]
Driver Seat
Car floor board on the acceleration pedal
• Magnetic field measurements using NARDA EHP-50D E&H field analyzer near driver side front tire, floor board, driver seat, and head rest, all less than 6.25uT for all relative vehicle positions.
11 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
Case Study of ORNL’s In-motion WPT • Aluminum shielding reduces the Electromagnetic Field to safer levels
on the passenger side front tire. • Effective when grid side units have to be away from the primary pad;
reduces emissions from high frequency wires from inverter to the primary coil.
Position #
Elec
trom
agne
tic F
ield
at t
he P
asse
nger
Sid
e Fr
ont T
ire
(Hig
hest
Pea
k) [μ
T]
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 90
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
15.516 μT field reduction due to
aluminum shielding on the floor
Aluminum Shield
12 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
In-motion Wireless Charging Demonstration • World’s very first in-motion wireless charging system using coils (not
using rails or long wire loops as in previous technologies) with power smoothing.
• Dynamic Wireless Power Transfer (WPT) – ORNL demonstration: GEM EV and 6-coil track – Also addressed motion dependent power pulsations
• Achieved 3 industry firsts: 1) in-vehicle charge power smoothing using carbon ultracapacitors, 2) grid side power smoothing using lithium-capacitors (LiC), 3) both in combination
13 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
ORNL Dynamic WPT Demonstrator • Dynamic Wireless Power Transfer (WPT) Experimental Results
– Illustration of system hardware – Power flow as function of vehicle position
– Future directions in dynamic WPT o Infrastructure issues (roadway integrity) o Communications requirements (latency) o Grid power distribution (intermittency) o Coil sequencing and power modulation & alignment o Local energy storage (smoothening)
‒ Promote dc distribution along highway ‒ Highly distributed vs. centralized HF stage
HF inverter system with HF transformer and self contained thermal management system
14 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
ORNL Dynamic WPT Demonstrator • DWPT Experimental Results • GEM vehicle driving across roadway coils
Illustration of roadway coil current quenching (0.2ms) and inverter turn-ON coil current ring-up (1.4ms)
2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 7 7.5130
135
140
145
150
155
160
165
170
Time [s]
Li-I
on C
apac
itor V
olta
ge [V
]
Powering first coil pair
Powering second coil pair
Powering third coil pair
Inverter OFF time
Inverter OFF time
Vehicle stays on top of the last coil
Inverter OFF time
2 3 4 5 6 7 8-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
Time [s]
Li-io
n C
apac
itor C
urre
nt [A
]
Inverter OFF time
Powering first coil pair
Powering second coil pair
Powering third coil pair
Inverter OFF time Inverter OFF
time
Vehicle stays on top of the last coil
Inverter turn-OFF transition and coil current fall
3.967 3.9675 3.968 3.9685 3.969 3.9695 3.97-250
-200
-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
Time [s]
Prim
ary
Coi
l Cur
rent
Rou
ted
by C
onta
ctor
s [A
]
Inverter turn-ON transition and coil current rise
3.993 3.9932 3.9934 3.9936 3.9938 3.994 3.9942 3.9944 3.9946 3.9948 3.995-250
-200
-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
Time [s]
Prim
ary
Coi
l Cur
rent
Rou
ted
by C
onta
ctor
s [A
]
15 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
ORNL Dynamic WPT Demonstrator • Feedback from electrified roadway
optical sensors are utilized to turn the inverter ON and OFF depending on the vehicle tire positions.
• Contactors are also controlled to direct the power from the inverter to the particular set of coils.
Inverter OFF time
3.8 3.85 3.9 3.95 4 4.05 4.1 4.15 4.2-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Time [s]
Li-io
n C
apac
itor C
urre
nt [A
]
Powering first coil pair
Powering second coil pair
Powering first coil pair
3.965 3.97 3.975 3.98 3.985 3.99 3.995-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Time [s]
Li-io
n C
apac
itor C
urre
nt [A
]
Powering second coil pair
Inverter turn-OFF time
16 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
ORNL Dynamic WPT Demonstrator • Primary coil current due to inverter turn OFF and ON and coil sequencing
Powering first coil pair
2 3 4 5 6 7 8-250
-200
-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
Time [s]
Prim
ary
Coi
l Cur
rent
Rou
ted
by C
onta
ctor
s [A
]
Powering second coil pair
Powering third coil pair
Vehicle stays on top of the last coil
Powering first coil pair
3.8 3.85 3.9 3.95 4 4.05 4.1 4.15 4.2-250
-200
-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
Time [s]
Prim
ary
Coi
l Cur
rent
Rou
ted
by C
onta
ctor
s [A
]
Powering second coil pair
Inverter turn-OFF time
Powering first coil pair
3.965 3.97 3.975 3.98 3.985 3.99 3.995-250
-200
-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
Time [s]
Prim
ary
Coi
l Cur
rent
Rou
ted
by C
onta
ctor
s [A
] Powering second coil pair
Inverter turn-OFF time
17 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
ORNL Developments in WPT Charging
Grid side LiC Vehicle side carbon UC
LiC
rack
fabr
icat
ed b
y El
ectro
Sta
ndar
ds
Labo
rato
ries,
Cra
nsto
n, R
I. D
r. R
ay S
epe
• The need for energy buffer: – We keep saying dynamic WPT can reduce the vehicle ESS. – However, high power is needed for effective energy transfer to the vehicle. – Energy storage capacity can be reduced, but power rating of the ESS should be increase. – How? – Decoupling power and energy components of the vehicle ESS – Also effectively reduces the vehicle battery and grid side power ripples.
18 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
Dual ESS Hybridization for in-motion WPT • Employing fast response EC based energy storage buffers have not been applied for wireless
power transfer systems. • Particularly for in-motion wireless applications, using EC energy storage systems for the purpose
of grid support or vehicle battery current ripple reduction makes use of a high power capable buffer available for both transmit and receive sides of the system.
• Both transmit side and the receive side have component that are relatively sensitive to the fast transients or high ripples.
acU Active Front End (AFE)
and PF Comp.
1T
2T 4T
+
-
doU1G
2G
3G
4G
sU
1C
1L 2L
M
2C oC
oU1I 2I +
-
bU bI3T
HF Power Converter
Bridge rectifier
doI
2D
1D 3D
4DPrimary Pad Secondary Pad
Vehicle battery
Vehicle (motional) side circuitGrid side circuit
19 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
Grid-side energy buffering/peak current reduction • Architecture 1: EC energy storage system is connected to the AC grid through a bi-directional
rectifier/inverter: • In this scheme, EC bidirectional
converter is first controlled in rectifier mode to smoothly charge the EC in normal conditions.
• This rectifier operation is stopped when the EC voltage reaches to its maximum value.
• Then, as soon as a vehicle starts passing through the primary coil, EC converter is operated in inverter mode.
• In this mode, EC is discharged with a high pulse power so that the charging power required for the car is not supplied from the grid.
• Once the vehicle moves away from the primary pads, EC converter is again operated in rectifier mode to relatively more slowly recharge the EC.
acU Active Front End (AFE)
and PF Comp.
1C
1L
1I
Primary Pad
HF Power Inverter
BidirectionalRectifier/Inverter
AC
Grid
Electrochemical Capacitor
ECU
+
-
+
-
acU
ECI1T
2T 4T
1G
2G
3G
4G
sU
3TCL
1D
2D
3D
4D
LI
dI
Controller with PWM
Regulation Strategy
1G
2GacU
dI
LI3G
4G
20 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
Grid-side energy buffering/peak current reduction • Architecture 2: EC energy storage system is connected to DC link through a DC/DC converter:
• In this configuration, instead of using a bi-directional rectifier/inverter, a bi-directional DC/DC converter is utilized by moving the EC to the DC side of the circuit.
• In this case, the EC is recharged from the DC link through a DC/DC converter under normal conditions. As soon as a vehicle starts passing through the primary pads, the EC is discharged to the DC link through the bi-directional DC/DC converter. After vehicle completes the WPT charging track, DC/DC converter is operated to relatively more slowly recharge the EC. In this configuration, the EC charging power is commanded by a controller with relatively slower dynamics.
acU Active Front End (AFE)
and PF Comp.
1C
1L
1I
Primary Pad
HF Power Inverter
BidirectionalDC/DC
Converter
Electrochemical CapacitorECU
+
-
+
-
dcU
ECI
DC
Lin
k
21 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
Grid-side energy buffering/peak current reduction • Architecture 3: EC energy storage system is passive parallel (directly) connected to the DC link:
• In this case, EC supplies a large burst of power to the HF inverter as a vehicle passes through the primary pad. Although this configuration does not provide an active energy management on the EC, the AFE rectifier’s DC link voltage dynamics can be slowed down so the high charging power does not reflect back to the grid.
acU Active Front End (AFE)
and PF Comp.
1C
1L
1I
Primary Pad
HF Power Inverter
Electrochemical Capacitor
+
-
ECdc UU
ECIDC
Lin
k
22 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
Grid-side energy buffering/peak current reduction • Architecture 4: EC energy storage system is connected to the DC link with a cascaded DC/DC
converter:
• In this case, the EC and its DC/DC converter are in a cascaded form with the AFE converter and the HP power inverter. In this scheme, the DC/DC converter does not have to be bidirectional as compared to the Architecture 2 shown earlier; therefore, cost and size savings are possible.
acU Active Front End (AFE)
and PF Comp.
1C
1L
1I
Primary Pad
HF Power Inverter
BidirectionalDC/DC
Converter
Electrochemical Capacitor
ECU
+
-
+
-
dcU
ECI
DC
Lin
k
23 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
Vehicle-side energy buffering/peak current reduction • Architecture 1: EC energy storage system is connected to the battery terminals via a cascaded
DC/DC converter:
• In this case, the high power pulse received by the secondary coils is rectified and dumped onto the DC link.
• Due its relatively faster dynamics, EC receives this high charging pulse. • When the vehicle completes the WPT pad tracks, EC is controlled in a way that it relatively more
slowly recharges the battery over a period of time.
2L
2C oCbU
bI
Seco
ndar
y Pa
d
Vehicle Battery
Bridge Rectifier
Electrochemical Capacitor
+
-
dcUD
C L
ink
Bidirectional DC/DC Converter
+
-
+
-
ECU
ECI
1T
1G
CL
1D
2T2G
2DController with PWM
Regulation Strategy
1G
2G
ECUdcV
bI
ECI
24 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
Vehicle-side energy buffering/peak current reduction • Architecture 2: EC energy storage system is connected to the DC link through a cascaded DC/DC
converter and it is connected to the battery terminals via another cascaded DC/DC converter:
• This architecture provides a more flexible control of the EC power and in this case the EC voltage is decoupled from the EC link voltage.
2L
2C oCbU
bI
Seco
ndar
y Pa
d
Vehicle battery
Bridge Rectifier
Electrochemical Capacitor
ECU
DC Link
DC/DC Converter
+
-
dcU DC/DC Converter
+
-
+
-
25 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
Vehicle-side energy buffering/peak current reduction • Architecture 3: EC energy storage system is connected to the DC link through a parallel bi-
directional buck-boost DC/DC converter:
• EC is recharged with a high power pulse when the vehicle is moving on the WPT pads. • Once the charge is received and vehicle moves away, EC is controlled to slowly recharge the
vehicle battery over a period of time. • This configuration provides that the EC voltage is decoupled from that of the battery voltage and
DC link voltage and enables actively controlling the charge and discharge power of the EC.
2L
2C oCbU
bI
Seco
ndar
y Pa
d
Vehicle battery
Bridge Rectifier
Electrochemical Capacitor
+
-
dcU
DC
Lin
k
BidirectionalDC/DC
Converter
+
-
+
-
ECU
ECI
26 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
Vehicle-side energy buffering/peak current reduction • Architecture 4: Two parallel individual DC/DC converters are utilized for vehicle battery and the
EC:
• This configuration involves two separate bi-directional DC/DC converters; one for the vehicle battery and other one for the EC for maximized flexibility in controls and active energy management among the storage devices.
2L
2C oCbU
bI
Seco
ndar
y Pa
d
Vehicle battery
Bridge Rectifier
Electrochemical Capacitor
+
-
dcU
DC
Lin
k
BidirectionalDC/DC
Converter
+
-
+
-
ECU
ECI
BidirectionalDC/DC
Converter
27 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
Simulations for a 6-coil track – ideal case • The power delivered from the grid with and
without the EC assistance with respect to the positions as the vehicle is passing through the transmit pads.
• Without the EC assistance on the primary side, the grid is more stressed and grid power has large dips and current ripples. However, under the EC assistance, only the average and much smoother power variations are reflected to the grid. All the grid power ripples and transients are eliminated since the EC is utilized as an energy buffer on the grid side
• Positive effect on the battery power variations.
• Similar to the grid power variations, ripples and dips in vehicle battery power can also be eliminated with the EC assistance.
• With the proper utilization of the EC, vehicle battery is only subject to the much smoother average power variations whereas EC energy storage system handles the ripples and high power variations.
0 5 10 15 20 25 300
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
Grid power without EC assistanceGrid power with EC assistance
Position #
Grid
Pow
er W
ith an
d W
ithou
t EC
Ass
istan
ce [W
]
0 5 10 15 20 25 300
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
Vehicle battery power without EC assistanceVehicle battery power with EC assistance
Position #
Veh
icle
Bat
tery
Pow
er W
ith a
nd W
ithou
t EC
Ass
ista
nce
[W]
28 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
Example design case: Ultra-capacitor sizing
• Let’s take the case moving from one coil to the other.
• There are 2 peak power transfer points on the track.
• The integral of the power transfer curve indicates that the energy transferred between two peak power points is 1794.3 Watt-seconds.
• Therefore: • 2469.7-675.3738 = 1794.3 Watt-
seconds of energy should be captured by the ultra-capacitor so that the battery receives only the average of the overall energy transfer between these points.
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 40
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
Time [s]
Pow
er [W
]
Power transfer curve
Time [s]
Ener
gy [W
s]Energy transfer curve
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 40
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
675.3738
2469.7
29 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
Example design case: Ultra-capacitor sizing • Maxwell K2 series ultra-capacitors have ideal maximum current rating. Particularly, maximum
current rating of BCAP0650 can carry 88 Arms maximum which is sufficient for our application. • GEM vehicle on-board battery pack is a lead-acid battery with 72V nominal voltage with 82V max
during charging. • Rated voltage of BCAP0650 is 2.70 V. In order to get a string of ultra-capacitors with ~82 V of
rated voltage, 30 ultra-capacitor cells are required in series:
• The rated capacitance of the string becomes 36.11 Farads:
• The voltage variation can be calculated by:
• Therefore:
• Hence, with 1.16 V of variation (discharge or discharge) in the ultra-capacitor string’s voltage, 1794.3 Watt-seconds of energy can be captured or delivered by the ultra-capacitor.
V8170.230
F67.2130650
22
21
initialfinal VVCE
VCEVV initialfinal 84.70
67.213.17942722 222
30 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
Experimental test results • Current ripple smoothing with Li-ion capacitors on the grid side unit and
carbon electrochemical ultra-capacitors on the vehicle side.
31 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
Summary • Current ripple smoothing with Li-ion capacitors on the grid side unit and
carbon electrochemical ultra-capacitors on the vehicle side.
Current ratio (Ipk/Iavg) Grid-side WPT base station
In-vehicle
III. No smoothing 53A 16A IV. Grid-side only with LiC 10A 16A VA.Vehicle side with UC 10A 2.6 VB.Vehicle side with LiC 10A 2.6
Pulse reduction 81% 84% for UC 84% for LiC
32 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy
Questions & Discussions
• Contact Information
– Omer C. Onar, [email protected], 865-946-1351 – P.T. Jones, [email protected], 865-946-1472 – Madhu Chinthavali, [email protected], 865-946-1411