orthosis evaluation tammy j. lesage mot, otr/l, cht elisabeth mcgee dpt, mot, otr/l, pt, cht, mtc

55
Orthosis Evaluation Orthosis Evaluation Tammy J. LeSage MOT, Tammy J. LeSage MOT, OTR/L, CHT OTR/L, CHT Elisabeth McGee DPT, MOT, Elisabeth McGee DPT, MOT, OTR/L, PT, CHT, MTC OTR/L, PT, CHT, MTC

Upload: tracey-greene

Post on 29-Dec-2015

230 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Orthosis Evaluation Tammy J. LeSage MOT, OTR/L, CHT Elisabeth McGee DPT, MOT, OTR/L, PT, CHT, MTC

Orthosis EvaluationOrthosis Evaluation

Tammy J. LeSage MOT, OTR/L, Tammy J. LeSage MOT, OTR/L, CHTCHT

Elisabeth McGee DPT, MOT, Elisabeth McGee DPT, MOT, OTR/L, PT, CHT, MTCOTR/L, PT, CHT, MTC

Page 2: Orthosis Evaluation Tammy J. LeSage MOT, OTR/L, CHT Elisabeth McGee DPT, MOT, OTR/L, PT, CHT, MTC

Orthotic EvaluationOrthotic Evaluation Interview, chart Interview, chart

review and reportsreview and reports Injury/ surgeryInjury/ surgery Hand dominance Hand dominance ObservationObservation Hand posture/ useHand posture/ use PalpationPalpation

Assessments for:Assessments for:PainPain

Skin and allergiesSkin and allergies WoundsWounds BoneBone Joint/ LigamentJoint/ Ligament Muscle/ TendonMuscle/ Tendon Nerve/ SensationNerve/ Sensation VascularVascular ROMROM FunctionFunction ReimbursementReimbursement

Page 3: Orthosis Evaluation Tammy J. LeSage MOT, OTR/L, CHT Elisabeth McGee DPT, MOT, OTR/L, PT, CHT, MTC

Orthotic ClassificationsOrthotic Classifications

Tammy J. LeSage MOT, OTR, Tammy J. LeSage MOT, OTR, CHTCHT

Elisabeth McGee DPT, MOT, Elisabeth McGee DPT, MOT, OTR/L, PT, CHT, MTCOTR/L, PT, CHT, MTC

Page 4: Orthosis Evaluation Tammy J. LeSage MOT, OTR/L, CHT Elisabeth McGee DPT, MOT, OTR/L, PT, CHT, MTC

TerminologyTerminology OrthosisOrthosis: is a noun and should be used in : is a noun and should be used in

place of the word place of the word splintsplint OrthosesOrthoses: is a pleural noun and should be : is a pleural noun and should be

used to replace the term for multiple used to replace the term for multiple splintssplints ““Fabricating an orthosisFabricating an orthosis” should be used ” should be used

in place of the verb in place of the verb splintingsplinting OrthoticOrthotic: is an adjective and is used to : is an adjective and is used to

describe a noun associated with the science describe a noun associated with the science of orthotics, such as orthotic device, orthotic of orthotics, such as orthotic device, orthotic treatment plan, orthotic intervention, treatment plan, orthotic intervention, orthotic fabrication, or orthotic codingorthotic fabrication, or orthotic coding

Page 5: Orthosis Evaluation Tammy J. LeSage MOT, OTR/L, CHT Elisabeth McGee DPT, MOT, OTR/L, PT, CHT, MTC

TerminologyTerminology

Durable Medical Equipment, Prosthetics, Durable Medical Equipment, Prosthetics, Orthotics, and SuppliesOrthotics, and Supplies (DMEPOS Quality Standards) (DMEPOS Quality Standards) DMEPOS suppliers must comply with the DMEPOS DMEPOS suppliers must comply with the DMEPOS

Quality Standards and become accredited to obtain Quality Standards and become accredited to obtain or maintain Medicare billing privileges or maintain Medicare billing privileges

Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) (HCPCS) Level 2 ManualLevel 2 Manual Orthotic devices are described by the CMS using L-Orthotic devices are described by the CMS using L-

codes that are found in this manualcodes that are found in this manual L-codes found here and are used to bill for orthosesL-codes found here and are used to bill for orthoses

Page 6: Orthosis Evaluation Tammy J. LeSage MOT, OTR/L, CHT Elisabeth McGee DPT, MOT, OTR/L, PT, CHT, MTC

Classifications SystemsClassifications Systems

Modified Orthosis Classification Modified Orthosis Classification System (MOCS)System (MOCS)Jacobs, 2014Jacobs, 2014Uses current terminology that Uses current terminology that

meet Medicare standards for meet Medicare standards for reimbursementreimbursement

ASHT’s Expanded Splint/Orthosis ASHT’s Expanded Splint/Orthosis Classification System (ESCS) Classification System (ESCS)

Page 7: Orthosis Evaluation Tammy J. LeSage MOT, OTR/L, CHT Elisabeth McGee DPT, MOT, OTR/L, PT, CHT, MTC

Modified Orthosis Modified Orthosis Classification System (MOCS)Classification System (MOCS)

Articular Nonarticular

Location (FO, HFO, WHFO, WHO, EWHFO, etc.)

Joint Positions (flex, ext, etc.)

Joint(s) Involved /Torque Application (wrist, MCP, PIP, DIP, etc.)

Immobilization Restriction

Location (humerus, MC, phalanx)

Mobilization

Design Options (dorsal, volar, radial, ulnar, circumferential, etc.

Direction(s) of Torque Application (flex, ext, etc.)

Orthotic Intervention for the Hand and Upper Extremity, 2014

Page 8: Orthosis Evaluation Tammy J. LeSage MOT, OTR/L, CHT Elisabeth McGee DPT, MOT, OTR/L, PT, CHT, MTC

ASHT Splint/Orthosis ASHT Splint/Orthosis Classification SystemClassification System

Rehabilitation of the Hand and Upper Extremity, 2011

Page 9: Orthosis Evaluation Tammy J. LeSage MOT, OTR/L, CHT Elisabeth McGee DPT, MOT, OTR/L, PT, CHT, MTC

ASHT Splint/Orthosis ASHT Splint/Orthosis Classification SystemClassification System

Rehabilitation of the Hand and Upper Extremity, 2011

Page 10: Orthosis Evaluation Tammy J. LeSage MOT, OTR/L, CHT Elisabeth McGee DPT, MOT, OTR/L, PT, CHT, MTC

ASHT Splint/Orthosis ASHT Splint/Orthosis Classification System: 6 Classification System: 6

CriteriaCriteria1.1. Articular or Non-articularArticular or Non-articular

2.2. Anatomic focus (e.g. 2Anatomic focus (e.g. 2ndnd digit PIP) digit PIP)

3.3. Kinematic direction (i.e. where joints are Kinematic direction (i.e. where joints are moved or positioned into.- e.g. flexion)moved or positioned into.- e.g. flexion)

4.4. Primary purpose (e.g. mobilization)Primary purpose (e.g. mobilization)

5.5. Type or number of secondary joint levelsType or number of secondary joint levels

6.6. Total number of joints included in the Total number of joints included in the orthosisorthosis

Page 11: Orthosis Evaluation Tammy J. LeSage MOT, OTR/L, CHT Elisabeth McGee DPT, MOT, OTR/L, PT, CHT, MTC

Key Anatomical Key Anatomical Headings/Classification By Headings/Classification By

Location Location Joints Involved Orthosis Classification

Shoulder, elbow, wrist, hand, finger orthosis

SEWHFO

Shoulder, elbow, wrist, hand orthosis SEWHO

Shoulder, elbow orthosis SEO

Elbow, wrist, hand, finger orthosis EWHFO

Elbow, wrist, hand orthosis EWHO

Wrist, hand, finger orthosis WHFO

Wrist, hand orthosis WHO

Hand, finger orthosis HFO

Shoulder orthosis SO

Elbow orthosis EO

Hand orthosis HO

Finger orthosis FO

Page 12: Orthosis Evaluation Tammy J. LeSage MOT, OTR/L, CHT Elisabeth McGee DPT, MOT, OTR/L, PT, CHT, MTC

Classification by FunctionClassification by Function

Immobilization Immobilization Mobilization Mobilization RestrictionRestrictionTorque Transmission Torque Transmission

Page 13: Orthosis Evaluation Tammy J. LeSage MOT, OTR/L, CHT Elisabeth McGee DPT, MOT, OTR/L, PT, CHT, MTC

ImmobilizationImmobilization

Page 14: Orthosis Evaluation Tammy J. LeSage MOT, OTR/L, CHT Elisabeth McGee DPT, MOT, OTR/L, PT, CHT, MTC

MobilizationMobilization

Page 15: Orthosis Evaluation Tammy J. LeSage MOT, OTR/L, CHT Elisabeth McGee DPT, MOT, OTR/L, PT, CHT, MTC

RestrictionRestriction

Page 16: Orthosis Evaluation Tammy J. LeSage MOT, OTR/L, CHT Elisabeth McGee DPT, MOT, OTR/L, PT, CHT, MTC

Torque TransmissionTorque Transmission

Page 17: Orthosis Evaluation Tammy J. LeSage MOT, OTR/L, CHT Elisabeth McGee DPT, MOT, OTR/L, PT, CHT, MTC

Non-MOCS/SCS NomenclatureNon-MOCS/SCS Nomenclature

Static OrthosisStatic OrthosisSerial Static OrthosisSerial Static OrthosisDynamic OrthosisDynamic OrthosisStatic Progressive OrthosisStatic Progressive Orthosis

Page 18: Orthosis Evaluation Tammy J. LeSage MOT, OTR/L, CHT Elisabeth McGee DPT, MOT, OTR/L, PT, CHT, MTC

Static OrthosisStatic Orthosis

Has no moving Has no moving components and components and immobilizes a joint or immobilizes a joint or part.part.

Used for:Used for: rest – arthritisrest – arthritis protection – fractureprotection – fracture positioning – CVApositioning – CVA loss of motor functionloss of motor function - nerve injury- nerve injury

Used with permission from Sammons Preston

Page 19: Orthosis Evaluation Tammy J. LeSage MOT, OTR/L, CHT Elisabeth McGee DPT, MOT, OTR/L, PT, CHT, MTC

Static OrthosisStatic Orthosis

Used with permission from Sammons Preston

Page 20: Orthosis Evaluation Tammy J. LeSage MOT, OTR/L, CHT Elisabeth McGee DPT, MOT, OTR/L, PT, CHT, MTC

Serial Static OrthosisSerial Static Orthosis

A splint the achieves A splint the achieves a slow, progressive a slow, progressive increase in ROM by increase in ROM by repeated molding of repeated molding of the splint. Low load, the splint. Low load, long duration long duration stretch.stretch.

Examples:Examples:

C barC bar

serial cast serial cast

Used with permission from Sammons Preston

Page 21: Orthosis Evaluation Tammy J. LeSage MOT, OTR/L, CHT Elisabeth McGee DPT, MOT, OTR/L, PT, CHT, MTC

Static Progressive OrthosisStatic Progressive Orthosis

An orthotic device An orthotic device that mobilizes joints that mobilizes joints or stretches soft or stretches soft tissue. The device tissue. The device includes a non-includes a non-elastic mechanism elastic mechanism that adjusts the that adjusts the amount of traction amount of traction force and angle force and angle acting on the part.acting on the part.

Page 22: Orthosis Evaluation Tammy J. LeSage MOT, OTR/L, CHT Elisabeth McGee DPT, MOT, OTR/L, PT, CHT, MTC

Static Progressive Orthosis Static Progressive Orthosis

Permission from Sammons Preston

Page 23: Orthosis Evaluation Tammy J. LeSage MOT, OTR/L, CHT Elisabeth McGee DPT, MOT, OTR/L, PT, CHT, MTC

Stress-Strain Curve &Stress-Strain Curve &Orthotic Forces Placed Upon Orthotic Forces Placed Upon

TissuesTissues

Page 24: Orthosis Evaluation Tammy J. LeSage MOT, OTR/L, CHT Elisabeth McGee DPT, MOT, OTR/L, PT, CHT, MTC

Static Progressive OrthosesStatic Progressive Orthoses Serial Static Orthoses Serial Static Orthoses

Utilizes the principle of Utilizes the principle of Stress RelaxationStress Relaxationconstant strain causes decreasing stress in constant strain causes decreasing stress in

tissuetissueThe tissues are stretched and held at a The tissues are stretched and held at a

constant length. The stretching forces relax constant length. The stretching forces relax over time. over time.

Theory: Relaxation occurs due to the Theory: Relaxation occurs due to the realignment of fibers and tissue elongation realignment of fibers and tissue elongation when tissues are held in a fixed position when tissues are held in a fixed position over time. over time.

Page 25: Orthosis Evaluation Tammy J. LeSage MOT, OTR/L, CHT Elisabeth McGee DPT, MOT, OTR/L, PT, CHT, MTC

Dynamic OrthosesDynamic Orthoses

A static based A static based orthosis with a orthosis with a mobile, resilient mobile, resilient component attached. component attached. Components consist Components consist of elastics, rubber of elastics, rubber bands, springs that bands, springs that produce motionproduce motion

Used with permission from Sammons Preston

Page 26: Orthosis Evaluation Tammy J. LeSage MOT, OTR/L, CHT Elisabeth McGee DPT, MOT, OTR/L, PT, CHT, MTC

Dynamic OrthosesDynamic Orthoses

Used with permission from Sammons Preston

Page 27: Orthosis Evaluation Tammy J. LeSage MOT, OTR/L, CHT Elisabeth McGee DPT, MOT, OTR/L, PT, CHT, MTC

Dynamic OrthosesDynamic Orthoses

Principle of CreepPrinciple of Creepconstant stress causes increasing constant stress causes increasing

strain in tissuestrain in tissueA constant load is applied for A constant load is applied for

several hours during the day over several hours during the day over a period of weeks or months.a period of weeks or months.

Low load, long duration stretch Low load, long duration stretch theory.theory.

Page 28: Orthosis Evaluation Tammy J. LeSage MOT, OTR/L, CHT Elisabeth McGee DPT, MOT, OTR/L, PT, CHT, MTC

Which Mobilization Which Mobilization Orthoses ??Orthoses ??

End Feel of the End Feel of the jointjoint

Stages of wound Stages of wound healinghealing

Page 29: Orthosis Evaluation Tammy J. LeSage MOT, OTR/L, CHT Elisabeth McGee DPT, MOT, OTR/L, PT, CHT, MTC

How much force with How much force with Mobilization ?Mobilization ?

Dr Brand’s theory:Dr Brand’s theory:

““Keeping the tissues at a physical Keeping the tissues at a physical state that demonstrates the need for state that demonstrates the need for change will stimulate the cells to change will stimulate the cells to multiply and make changes in multiply and make changes in response to the need. The more response to the need. The more time in the orthosis, the more quickly time in the orthosis, the more quickly the tissues will respond.”the tissues will respond.”

Page 30: Orthosis Evaluation Tammy J. LeSage MOT, OTR/L, CHT Elisabeth McGee DPT, MOT, OTR/L, PT, CHT, MTC

Classification by DesignClassification by Design

Single surface designSingle surface designCircumferential designCircumferential designForearm based, hand based, finger Forearm based, hand based, finger

basedbased

Page 31: Orthosis Evaluation Tammy J. LeSage MOT, OTR/L, CHT Elisabeth McGee DPT, MOT, OTR/L, PT, CHT, MTC

Single Surface DesignSingle Surface Design

Volar/ palmarVolar/ palmar DorsalDorsal Radial half – radial Radial half – radial

guttergutter Ulnar half – ulnar Ulnar half – ulnar

guttergutter

Benefits:Benefits: Support joints of Support joints of

flaccid muscles – flaccid muscles – CVACVA

Effective base for Effective base for outriggersoutriggers

Post operative Post operative orthotics – no orthotics – no pressure to areas, pressure to areas, will damage repair.will damage repair.

Page 32: Orthosis Evaluation Tammy J. LeSage MOT, OTR/L, CHT Elisabeth McGee DPT, MOT, OTR/L, PT, CHT, MTC

Single Surface DesignSingle Surface Design

Dorsal DesignDorsal Design Advantages:Advantages: Sensory surface Sensory surface

exposedexposed Less distal Less distal

migrationmigration Best for extension Best for extension

outriggeroutrigger Disadvantages:Disadvantages:

Less muscular Less muscular padding, more bony padding, more bony prominencesprominences

Page 33: Orthosis Evaluation Tammy J. LeSage MOT, OTR/L, CHT Elisabeth McGee DPT, MOT, OTR/L, PT, CHT, MTC

Single Surface DesignSingle Surface Design

Volar DesignVolar Design AdvantagesAdvantages Natural padding Natural padding

(skin/ muscle)(skin/ muscle) Best for flexion Best for flexion

outriggeroutrigger DisadvantagesDisadvantages

Tends to migrate Tends to migrate distally with distally with dynamic tensiondynamic tension

Page 34: Orthosis Evaluation Tammy J. LeSage MOT, OTR/L, CHT Elisabeth McGee DPT, MOT, OTR/L, PT, CHT, MTC

Circumferential DesignCircumferential Design

Covers all surfacesCovers all surfaces Thinner materialThinner material

Contour adds Contour adds ridgity and strengthridgity and strength

Perforated materialPerforated material

Beneficial for:Beneficial for: Immobilization Immobilization

painful jointpainful joint Protect soft tissueProtect soft tissue Orthotic for activity Orthotic for activity

– more comfort and – more comfort and controlcontrol

Good design for Good design for serial static serial static orthoticsorthotics

Helps prevent Helps prevent migration migration

Page 35: Orthosis Evaluation Tammy J. LeSage MOT, OTR/L, CHT Elisabeth McGee DPT, MOT, OTR/L, PT, CHT, MTC

Circumferential DesignCircumferential Design

AdvantagesAdvantages Most stableMost stable Least migrationLeast migration

DisadvantagesDisadvantages More complex More complex

designdesign More difficult for More difficult for

patient to applypatient to apply

Page 36: Orthosis Evaluation Tammy J. LeSage MOT, OTR/L, CHT Elisabeth McGee DPT, MOT, OTR/L, PT, CHT, MTC

Forearm Based DesignForearm Based Design

AdvantagesAdvantages Allows flexibility Allows flexibility

with adjusting with adjusting dynamic or static dynamic or static progressive tensionprogressive tension

DisadvantagesDisadvantages Bulkier and heavier Bulkier and heavier

to carryto carry

Page 37: Orthosis Evaluation Tammy J. LeSage MOT, OTR/L, CHT Elisabeth McGee DPT, MOT, OTR/L, PT, CHT, MTC

Hand Based DesignHand Based Design

AdvantagesAdvantages Light weight, easier Light weight, easier

to carryto carry Less interference Less interference

with UE functionwith UE function

DisadvantagesDisadvantages Difficult to fabricateDifficult to fabricate Inadequate length Inadequate length

for dynamic tension for dynamic tension devicedevice

Page 38: Orthosis Evaluation Tammy J. LeSage MOT, OTR/L, CHT Elisabeth McGee DPT, MOT, OTR/L, PT, CHT, MTC

Common Names Common Names

Radial Bar Wrist Radial Bar Wrist Cock up Cock up

Immobilization Immobilization orthoticorthotic

Static orthoticStatic orthotic

Used with permission from Sammons Preston

Page 39: Orthosis Evaluation Tammy J. LeSage MOT, OTR/L, CHT Elisabeth McGee DPT, MOT, OTR/L, PT, CHT, MTC

Common NamesCommon Names

Resting Hand or Resting Hand or Functional Position Functional Position OrthosisOrthosis

Immobilization Immobilization OrthosisOrthosis

Static OrthosisStatic Orthosis

Used with permission from Sammons Preston

Page 40: Orthosis Evaluation Tammy J. LeSage MOT, OTR/L, CHT Elisabeth McGee DPT, MOT, OTR/L, PT, CHT, MTC

Common NamesCommon Names

Thumb Spica IP Thumb Spica IP joint includedjoint included

Immobilization Immobilization OrthosisOrthosis

Static OrthosisStatic Orthosis

Used with permission from Sammons Preston

Page 41: Orthosis Evaluation Tammy J. LeSage MOT, OTR/L, CHT Elisabeth McGee DPT, MOT, OTR/L, PT, CHT, MTC

Biomechanical PrinciplesBiomechanical Principles

Tammy LeSage MOT, OTR/L, Tammy LeSage MOT, OTR/L, CHTCHT

Elisabeth DPT, MOT, PT, Elisabeth DPT, MOT, PT, OTR/L, CHT, MTCOTR/L, CHT, MTC

Page 42: Orthosis Evaluation Tammy J. LeSage MOT, OTR/L, CHT Elisabeth McGee DPT, MOT, OTR/L, PT, CHT, MTC

Biomechanical Principles - Biomechanical Principles - Orthoses:Orthoses:

Clinical ApplicationClinical Application Wider longer orthoses are more comfortable Wider longer orthoses are more comfortable

than short narrow orthoses. The length the than short narrow orthoses. The length the forearm trough should be approximately 2/3 forearm trough should be approximately 2/3 the length of the forearm.the length of the forearm.

Smoothed, flared or rolled edges on the Smoothed, flared or rolled edges on the proximal and distal aspect of an orthosis proximal and distal aspect of an orthosis causes less pressure than do straight edgescauses less pressure than do straight edges

You should attempt to maintain ½ the You should attempt to maintain ½ the circumference of the thumb and forearm for circumference of the thumb and forearm for a correct fit.a correct fit.

Page 43: Orthosis Evaluation Tammy J. LeSage MOT, OTR/L, CHT Elisabeth McGee DPT, MOT, OTR/L, PT, CHT, MTC

Biomechanical Biomechanical Principles….cont.Principles….cont.

Continuous uniform pressure over bony Continuous uniform pressure over bony prominences is preferable to unequal prominences is preferable to unequal pressure on a prominence.pressure on a prominence.

Because some orthotic components must Because some orthotic components must be narrow and the resultant force is great, be narrow and the resultant force is great, a contiguous fit is paramount. a contiguous fit is paramount.

Wider straps and finger slings lower Wider straps and finger slings lower pressure applied to the underlying tissues.pressure applied to the underlying tissues.

Contour mechanically increases material Contour mechanically increases material strengthstrength

Page 44: Orthosis Evaluation Tammy J. LeSage MOT, OTR/L, CHT Elisabeth McGee DPT, MOT, OTR/L, PT, CHT, MTC

First Class Lever SystemFirst Class Lever System(Three points of fixation)(Three points of fixation)

F = Force F = Force A = FulcrumA = Fulcrum

AxisAxis R = ResistanceR = Resistance FA = Force ArmFA = Force Arm RA = ResistanceRA = Resistance

ArmArm

Page 45: Orthosis Evaluation Tammy J. LeSage MOT, OTR/L, CHT Elisabeth McGee DPT, MOT, OTR/L, PT, CHT, MTC

Mechanical Advantage: Force Mechanical Advantage: Force

Which orthotic Which orthotic design has to best design has to best mechanical mechanical advantage?advantage?

Force ?Force ?

Fess, 1987

Page 46: Orthosis Evaluation Tammy J. LeSage MOT, OTR/L, CHT Elisabeth McGee DPT, MOT, OTR/L, PT, CHT, MTC

Formula for ForceFormula for Force

R x RAR x RA =F =F

FAFA

R = 9lbsR = 9lbs

RA = 2.5 inchesRA = 2.5 inches

FA = Orthotic 1 - 4 FA = Orthotic 1 - 4 inin

Orthotic 2 - 8 Orthotic 2 - 8 inin

Fess, 1987

Page 47: Orthosis Evaluation Tammy J. LeSage MOT, OTR/L, CHT Elisabeth McGee DPT, MOT, OTR/L, PT, CHT, MTC

Force Orthosis – Forearm 8 Force Orthosis – Forearm 8 inches inches

9lbs x 2.5 inches 9lbs x 2.5 inches

8 inches8 inches

= 0.28 lbs force= 0.28 lbs forceFess, 1987

Page 48: Orthosis Evaluation Tammy J. LeSage MOT, OTR/L, CHT Elisabeth McGee DPT, MOT, OTR/L, PT, CHT, MTC

Force Orthosis – Forearm 4 Force Orthosis – Forearm 4 inchesinches

9lbs x 2.5 inches9lbs x 2.5 inches

4 inches4 inches

= 0.56 lbs force= 0.56 lbs force

Fess, 1987

Page 49: Orthosis Evaluation Tammy J. LeSage MOT, OTR/L, CHT Elisabeth McGee DPT, MOT, OTR/L, PT, CHT, MTC

Mechanical AdvantageMechanical Advantage

Formula for MAFormula for MA

MA = MA = FAFA

RARA

Orthosis #1Orthosis #1

4 4 = 1.6 = 1.6

2.52.5

Orthosis #2Orthosis #2

8 8 = 3.2 = 3.2

2.52.5

Page 50: Orthosis Evaluation Tammy J. LeSage MOT, OTR/L, CHT Elisabeth McGee DPT, MOT, OTR/L, PT, CHT, MTC

Stresses to Skin and Soft Stresses to Skin and Soft TissueTissue

Tension: opposing Tension: opposing forcesforces

Compression: Compression: inward forcesinward forces

Shear: parallel Shear: parallel forces forces

Fess, 1987

Page 51: Orthosis Evaluation Tammy J. LeSage MOT, OTR/L, CHT Elisabeth McGee DPT, MOT, OTR/L, PT, CHT, MTC

PressurePressure

Formula for Formula for PressurePressure

P = P = Total ForceTotal Force

Area of Area of ApplicationApplication

Orthosis #1Orthosis #1

25 gm force25 gm force

1cm X 1cm1cm X 1cm

= 0.25 gm P sq mm= 0.25 gm P sq mm Orthosis #2Orthosis #2

25 gm force25 gm force

5cm x 5 cm5cm x 5 cm

= 0.01 gm P sq mm = 0.01 gm P sq mm

Page 52: Orthosis Evaluation Tammy J. LeSage MOT, OTR/L, CHT Elisabeth McGee DPT, MOT, OTR/L, PT, CHT, MTC

Mobilization ForcesMobilization Forces

Application of force to Application of force to a moving part.a moving part.

Must remain Must remain constant.constant.

Want rotational Want rotational element versus element versus translational element.translational element.

Optimal rotational Optimal rotational force occurs with a 90 force occurs with a 90 degree angle of pull.degree angle of pull.

Fess, 1987

Page 53: Orthosis Evaluation Tammy J. LeSage MOT, OTR/L, CHT Elisabeth McGee DPT, MOT, OTR/L, PT, CHT, MTC

DocumentationDocumentation

Important information to include in Important information to include in documentation when providing an documentation when providing an orthotic device. Your thoughts?orthotic device. Your thoughts?

Legal implicationsLegal implications

Page 54: Orthosis Evaluation Tammy J. LeSage MOT, OTR/L, CHT Elisabeth McGee DPT, MOT, OTR/L, PT, CHT, MTC

DocumentationDocumentation

Medial condition that warrants an orthotic Medial condition that warrants an orthotic devicedevice

Medical necessity of orthotic deviceMedical necessity of orthotic device Type, purpose and anatomical location of Type, purpose and anatomical location of

orthotic deviceorthotic device Communicated written and oral wear scheduleCommunicated written and oral wear schedule Precautions discussedPrecautions discussed Rehabilitation potential with orthotic deviceRehabilitation potential with orthotic device Goals related to functionGoals related to function Date and time patient to return (if applicable)Date and time patient to return (if applicable)

Page 55: Orthosis Evaluation Tammy J. LeSage MOT, OTR/L, CHT Elisabeth McGee DPT, MOT, OTR/L, PT, CHT, MTC

DocumentationDocumentation

Follow up visitFollow up visitDocument noted problems with Document noted problems with

compliancecomplianceChanges in the orthotic and wear Changes in the orthotic and wear

schedulescheduleChanges with motion if mobilization etc.Changes with motion if mobilization etc.