orthosis evaluation using motion analysis –part 1 › userfiles › file › ic18... · orthosis...

12
Orthosis Evaluation Using Motion Analysis – Part 1 AACPDM 2017 – IC #18 1 Evaluation of Orthosis Function in Children with Neuromuscular Disorders Using Motion Analysis Outcomes Sylvia Õunpuu, MSc and Kristan Pierz, MD Center for Motion Analysis Connecticut Children’s Medical Center Farmington, Connecticut Disclosure Information AACPDM 71st Annual Meeting | September 13-16, 2017 Speaker Names: Sylvia Ounpuu, MSc and Kristan Pierz, MD Disclosure of Relevant Financial Relationships: We have no financial relationships to disclose. Disclosure of Off-Label and/or investigative uses: We will not discuss off label use and/or investigational use in our presentation. NOTE Please note – we are not including patient photographs in the handout for patient confidentiality reasons. Purpose To demonstrate how clinical gait analysis can aid in the understanding of orthosis function and prescription in children and adolescents with neuromuscular disorders. Objectives Be familiar with: basic tools needed to interpret joint kinematic and kinetic data typical and atypical joint kinematic and kinetic patterns the goals of orthosis function in terms of joint kinematics and kinetics Understand the clinical utility of incorporating joint kinetic concepts in orthosis prescription and decision-making Question? How many people have written the following script? Diagnosis: Cerebral Palsy Prescription: AFO

Upload: others

Post on 27-Jun-2020

11 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Orthosis Evaluation Using Motion Analysis –Part 1 › UserFiles › file › IC18... · Orthosis Evaluation Using Motion Analysis –Part 1 AACPDM 2017 –IC #18 5 Femur relative

Orthosis Evaluation Using Motion Analysis – Part 1

AACPDM 2017 – IC #18 1

Evaluation of Orthosis Function in Children with Neuromuscular Disorders

Using Motion Analysis Outcomes

Sylvia Õunpuu, MSc and Kristan Pierz, MD

Center for Motion Analysis

Connecticut Children’s Medical Center

Farmington, Connecticut

Disclosure InformationAACPDM 71st Annual Meeting | September 13-16, 2017

Speaker Names: Sylvia Ounpuu, MSc and Kristan Pierz, MD

Disclosure of Relevant Financial Relationships:

We have no financial relationships to disclose.

Disclosure of Off-Label and/or investigative uses:

We will not discuss off label use and/or investigational use in our presentation.

NOTE

Please note – we are not including patient photographs in the handout for patient

confidentiality reasons.

Purpose

To demonstrate how clinical gait analysis can aid in the understanding of orthosis function and prescription in children and adolescents with

neuromuscular disorders.

Objectives

• Be familiar with:

– basic tools needed to interpret joint kinematic and kinetic data

– typical and atypical joint kinematic and kinetic patterns

– the goals of orthosis function in terms of joint kinematics and kinetics

• Understand the clinical utility of incorporating joint kinetic concepts in orthosis prescription and decision-making

Question?

How many people have written the following script?

– Diagnosis: Cerebral Palsy

– Prescription: AFO

Page 2: Orthosis Evaluation Using Motion Analysis –Part 1 › UserFiles › file › IC18... · Orthosis Evaluation Using Motion Analysis –Part 1 AACPDM 2017 –IC #18 5 Femur relative

Orthosis Evaluation Using Motion Analysis – Part 1

AACPDM 2017 – IC #18 2

Outline

• Terminology

• Methods

• Typically developing

• Case examples – variety of pathologies

Definitions

• Kinematics:

– Joint and segment motion (degrees) during gait

– Coronal, sagittal and transverse plane

– Trunk, pelvis, hips, knees, ankles and foot progression

Definitions

• Joint Kinetics:– Description of the forces that cause motion

during gait

– Sagittal and coronal planes

– Hip, knees and ankles

– Joint moments and powers

Definitions

• Joint Kinetics– Help in the understanding of the cause of gait

abnormalities

– impact of pathology on forces/loads

• Joint kinetics provide additional understanding for orthosis decision-making and evaluation not possible with joint kinetics

Gait Cycle:

• Period of time from one event (usually initial contact) of one foot to the subsequent occurrence of the same foot

• Represented as 0 to 100% of the gait cycle

• Allows comparison of multiple strides of data

Gait cycle divisions:

• Stance phase (ST): – The period in time when the foot is in contact with the

ground.

– In normal gait this represents about 60% of the gait cycle.

• Swing phase (SW):– The period in time when the foot is not in contact with

the ground.

– In normal gait this represents about 40% of the gait cycle.

Stance Phase Swing Phase0% 60% 100%

Page 3: Orthosis Evaluation Using Motion Analysis –Part 1 › UserFiles › file › IC18... · Orthosis Evaluation Using Motion Analysis –Part 1 AACPDM 2017 –IC #18 5 Femur relative

Orthosis Evaluation Using Motion Analysis – Part 1

AACPDM 2017 – IC #18 3

Phases of the gait cycle: (Perry, 1994)

• loading response (LR) / double support (0-10%)

• mid-stance (MST) (10-30%)

• terminal stance (TST) (30-50%)

• pre-swing (PSW) / double support (50-60%)

• initial swing (ISW) (60-73%)

• mid-swing (MSW) (73-87%)

• terminal swing (TSW) (87-100%)

Definition of the Gait Cycle

0% gait cycle 100% gait cycle

Calculating Joint Kinematics

(joint angle plot)

Reflective joint/segment markers

(skeletal model – angle definition)STANCE SWINGDORSIFLEXION

PLANTAR FLEXION

KINEMATIC DATA JOINT ANGLES DURING MOTION

TOE OFFINITIAL

CONTACTINITIAL

CONTACT

GAIT CYCLE

Right side = green line

Left side = red line*

*REFERENCE

DATA(N=580)

0 deg

Ankle Sagittal Plane Motion

• Angle Definition

– the relative angle between a line perpendicular to the long axis of the shank and the plantar aspect of the foot

– as viewed by looking along an axis perpendicular to the shank-foot plane

Perpendicular to the tibia relative to the plantar aspect of the foot

Ankle Sagittal Plane

*

Page 4: Orthosis Evaluation Using Motion Analysis –Part 1 › UserFiles › file › IC18... · Orthosis Evaluation Using Motion Analysis –Part 1 AACPDM 2017 –IC #18 5 Femur relative

Orthosis Evaluation Using Motion Analysis – Part 1

AACPDM 2017 – IC #18 4

Ankle Sagittal Plane Motion Ankle Sagittal Plane Motion

Ankle Sagittal Plane Motion Ankle Sagittal Plane Motion

Ankle Sagittal Plane Motion

Page 5: Orthosis Evaluation Using Motion Analysis –Part 1 › UserFiles › file › IC18... · Orthosis Evaluation Using Motion Analysis –Part 1 AACPDM 2017 –IC #18 5 Femur relative

Orthosis Evaluation Using Motion Analysis – Part 1

AACPDM 2017 – IC #18 5

Femur relative to the tibia

Knee Sagittal Plane

*

Joint Kinetics

• Help in the understanding of the– cause of gait abnormalities

– biomechanical impact of pathology

– biomechanical basis for treatment

– muscles are producing forces

– muscles that are contracting

1. KINETIC FUNDAMENTALSWhat is a “Moment”???

• A moment is a force’s ability to cause the rotation of an object

• Synonymous with torque

• Moment = force x distance

Moment

moment = force x distance

d

Muscles create moments about joints called “joint moments”

Joint Moments

Joint Moment = force (F) x distance (d)

What happens when the quadriceps contract?

Page 6: Orthosis Evaluation Using Motion Analysis –Part 1 › UserFiles › file › IC18... · Orthosis Evaluation Using Motion Analysis –Part 1 AACPDM 2017 –IC #18 5 Femur relative

Orthosis Evaluation Using Motion Analysis – Part 1

AACPDM 2017 – IC #18 6

Net Joint Moment

• Summation of all the forces acting on a joint to produce joint movement

– External forces

– Act upon the body

– Internal forces

– Body’s response to external loads

Internal Forces

• Active forces: muscle contractions

• Passive forces: ligaments, muscle/tendon contractures (anything that constrains joint motion)

• External forces

– Ground reaction force

– Gravity – segment weight (mass)

– Inertia – segments rotational inertia

Internal and External Forces?

VIDEO

ANKLE – Ground reaction force

Initial Contact

GRF

MomentGRF =

GRF

FGRF x d MomentWT =

ANKLE – Force due to mass of segment

Segment weight

Initial Contact

Fweight

FWT x

d

d

Page 7: Orthosis Evaluation Using Motion Analysis –Part 1 › UserFiles › file › IC18... · Orthosis Evaluation Using Motion Analysis –Part 1 AACPDM 2017 –IC #18 5 Femur relative

Orthosis Evaluation Using Motion Analysis – Part 1

AACPDM 2017 – IC #18 7

ANKLE – Muscle force

Initial Contact

Muscle force

Momentmuscle =

Muscle force

Fmuscle x d

Net Internal Moment

• Net Internal Moment = body’s response to external loads

• Results in desired motion and stability

• Calculated through a process called Inverse Dynamics

Hip – Knee - Ankle Joint Moments

(Ounpuu et al., JPO, 11:341-349,1991)

Typical kinetic patterns – Ankle

NOTE – ground reaction force illustration

– not complete computation

Ankle

• First Rocker• Heel initial contact• Small dorsiflexor

moment• Negligible power

Ankle

• Second Rocker• Weight bearing

progresses distally under foot

• Eccentric ankle plantar flexor activity allows for controlled ankle dorsiflexion

• Progressively larger ankle plantar flexor moment

• Negligible power

Page 8: Orthosis Evaluation Using Motion Analysis –Part 1 › UserFiles › file › IC18... · Orthosis Evaluation Using Motion Analysis –Part 1 AACPDM 2017 –IC #18 5 Femur relative

Orthosis Evaluation Using Motion Analysis – Part 1

AACPDM 2017 – IC #18 8

Ankle

• Third Rocker• Ankle plantar flexors

concentrically contract to provide propulsion

• Large extensor moment and power generation until the end of single stance

Ankle

• Swing

– Negligible moment power due to small mass of the foot

Examples of Atypical Ankle Moments……

What abnormal contact pattern does this suggest?

• Sagittal plane ankle moment (3 trials vs. typical)

Dorsiflexor

Plantar flexor

Resultant Ground Reaction Force

Loading Response Mid Stance Terminal Stance

Foot flat initial contact pattern

• Absence of dorsiflexor moment during loading response

• Early and gradual development of a plantar flexor moment

• Normal peak plantar flexor moment in terminal stance

Plantar flexor

Dorsiflexor

Page 9: Orthosis Evaluation Using Motion Analysis –Part 1 › UserFiles › file › IC18... · Orthosis Evaluation Using Motion Analysis –Part 1 AACPDM 2017 –IC #18 5 Femur relative

Orthosis Evaluation Using Motion Analysis – Part 1

AACPDM 2017 – IC #18 9

What abnormal contact pattern does this suggest?

• Sagittal plane ankle moment (3 trials vs. typical) Plantar flexor

Dorsiflexor

Resultant Ground Reaction Force

Loading Response Mid Stance Terminal Stance

Toe initial contact pattern

• Absence of dorsiflexor moment during loading response

• Rapid development of a plantar flexor moment

• Reduced peak plantar flexor moment in terminal stance

Plantar flexor

Dorsiflexor

What abnormal contact pattern does this suggest?

• Sagittal plane ankle moment (3 trials vs. typical) Plantar flexor

Dorsiflexor

Heel only weight bearing pattern

• Absence of dorsiflexor moment during loading response

• Negligible plantar flexor moment through out stance

Plantar flexor

Dorsiflexor

What is “Power”

• Power is the rate at which the net moment is able to rotate the segment

• Power = Moment x Angular Velocity

• Joint power is required to move!

• Provides information about type of muscle contraction

Page 10: Orthosis Evaluation Using Motion Analysis –Part 1 › UserFiles › file › IC18... · Orthosis Evaluation Using Motion Analysis –Part 1 AACPDM 2017 –IC #18 5 Femur relative

Orthosis Evaluation Using Motion Analysis – Part 1

AACPDM 2017 – IC #18 10

Power Absorption and Generation

• an eccentric contraction = power absorption

• a concentric contraction = power generation

Second Rocker Third Rocker

Motion

Moment

Power

2. Assess the amplitude of the moment

Power = Moment x Angular Velocity

1. Determine angular velocity by looking at the slope of the motion curve

3. Calculate the power

Hip-Knee-Ankle Powers

Plantar Flexor

Dorsi-flexor

(Ounpuu et al., JPO, 11:341-349,1991)

Ankle

• First Rocker

– Minimal power due to minimal ankle motion

• Second Rocker

– Power absorption with eccentric contract of ankle plantar flexors as the ankle dorsiflexes

• Third Rocker

– Power generation with concentric contraction of the ankle plantar flexors to provide plantar flexion

Plantar Flexor

Dorsi-flexor

Test!

• What would you predict would be the joint moment for this patient? (walking with shoes and solid AFO’s)

• There is excessive knee flexion and a toe initial contact.

C74788

Test!

• What would you predict would be the joint power for this patient?

Page 11: Orthosis Evaluation Using Motion Analysis –Part 1 › UserFiles › file › IC18... · Orthosis Evaluation Using Motion Analysis –Part 1 AACPDM 2017 –IC #18 5 Femur relative

Orthosis Evaluation Using Motion Analysis – Part 1

AACPDM 2017 – IC #18 11

• Joint kinematic shows no angular velocity.

• There can be a joint moment with no angular velocity.

• Angular velocity is needed for joint power to be possible.

How do orthoses work?

• Biomechanical basis for orthosis function

How do orthoses work?

• During gait orthoses RESTRICT atypical range of motion that may be present due to muscle weakness, joint laxity and/or abnormal loads

• In the case of weak ankle plantar flexors, the orthosis provides a force to create a plantar flexor moment

Impact of a solid ankle-foot orthosis…

Typical Plantar flexor

weakness

Solid AFO(augments plantar

flexor moment)

Plantar Flexor Moment

Mechanical Basis Behind AFO’s

• AFO’s constrain excessive ankle dorsiflexion in stance when plantar flexors are weak

• Therefore, weight bearing on the distal aspect of the foot is possible

Barefoot AFO

Impact of a knee-ankle-foot orthosis…

Normal Knee adductor moment

“valgus thrust”

KAFO(supports knee

adductor moment)

Page 12: Orthosis Evaluation Using Motion Analysis –Part 1 › UserFiles › file › IC18... · Orthosis Evaluation Using Motion Analysis –Part 1 AACPDM 2017 –IC #18 5 Femur relative

Orthosis Evaluation Using Motion Analysis – Part 1

AACPDM 2017 – IC #18 12

Orthoses impact adjacent joints…

Typical knee Crouch Typical knee

Reducing excessive ankle dorsiflexion with an ankle-foot orthosiswill reduce associated excessive knee flexion.

Possible Issues to Consider

• Must have sufficient range of motion to tolerate the orthosis

• Bony deformity may make brace fitting and comfort a challenge

• If there is too much restriction in movement you may limit orthosis benefits

How can we test these “hypotheses” about

orthosis function?

How can we evaluate

orthosis function during gait?

COMPREHENSIVE

MOTION ANALYSIS

End Part 1 – Q and A