osmosis and diffusion lab using potato cores...
TRANSCRIPT
Biology: Osmosis and Diffusion Lab using Potato Cores Class: 3B Mr. Boyer Name: Simon Han
Abstract:
In this experiment, we learnt about Osmosis and Diffusion through potato
cores in different concentration of sucrose, (water, .2, .4, .6, .8, 1.0). We
realized that the lower the concentration, the higher the potato cores weighed.
However, our result was quite off for the potato cores in .8 sucrose
concentrations. The graph should decrease, but our graph was decreasing and
suddenly crosses the x-‐axis then down again. Our graph had 3 x-‐intercepts. The
equation of our graph is y = -‐46.56x + 34.76. Our x-‐intercept of the best-‐fit
line is (1.34, 0). Although our graph and our results were off, it still partially
backed up our hypothesis.
Research Questions:
How does Osmosis affect the weights of object in different concentrations?
Introduction:
All cells have membranes that are selectively permeable. In other words, they
allow certain things in and certain substances are not allowed to enter the
interior of the cell. The process by which water crosses membranes from
regions of high water concentration to regions of low water concentration is
called Osmosis. Osmosis is the process whereby water moves across a cell
membrane by diffusion. Diffusion takes place when the molecules of a
substance tend to move from areas of higher concentration to areas of
lower concentration. Cells must tightly control the process of osmosis
otherwise they will die. Plants with too little water will wilt. This happens
when water moves out of the cells by osmosis. Without this water there is
little pressure inside the cells and the plant can no longer support itself
against the pull of gravity.
Hypothesis:
The more hypertonic potato cores are to sucrose solution, the more weight
potato cores gain. On the other hand, potato cores will decrease in weight
when it is hypotonic to sucrose solution.
Variables:
Dependent: The final mass of the potato cores
Independent: Concentration of sucrose
Controlled: Size of potato, time spent in solution, amount of solution
Apparatus:
• Potato cores (4 per condition)
• Sucrose solutions (.2, .4, .6, .8, 1.0)
• Distilled water
• Electronic balance
• Plastic weighing tray
• Plastic cups (6)
• Graduated cylinder (50 ml)
• Scalpel
• Marking tape
• Blue tweezers
Procedures:
1. Using marking tape, label 6 cups with the following solution types (.2, .4, .6, .8,
1.0 and Di water).
2. Place approximately 50 ml of the various solutions, each cup receiving a
separate solution. Suggestion, measure the di water with the graduated
cylinder, and fill the other cups to the same level
3. Obtain 24 potato cores and cut them to equal sizes (about 2.5 cm). All the
cores you use must be the same length
4. Divide your 24 cores into 6 groups and gently blot them dry with a paper towel
5. Using the electronic balance and plastic weighing tray mass (weigh) each group
of potato cores and record the data in a table that is labeled with a detailed
title and which provides the error measurement of the electronic scale. MAKE
SURE TO TARE THE TRAY. The table should record the type of solution in the
cup and the mass of the potatoes in the cup.
6. Place the potato core sets in their appropriate cup and place in Mr. Boyer’s
back prep room in the fume hood that is labeled with your block (3B or 4B).
7. 24 hours later (app) you will need to come and measure the mass of your
potato cores. To do this you must pore off the fluid in the cup and use the
plastic blue tweezers remove the cores, blot them dry just as you did in the set
up phase and final measure them using a plastic weighing tray. MAKE SURE TO
TARE THE TRAY. Record your potato group mass on your data chart.
8. Finally dump your potato cores in the trash and wash and dry your equipment
(cups, tweezers and return them to their stations.
9. Calculations. For each setup (all 6) you will need to calculate a percent mass
change. To do this you will use the following formula (final mass-‐initial
mass)/initial mass x 100. You will need to record this data in your data table
as well. Make sure to keep track of the positive and negative changes if they
occur.
Figure 2 This is a picture of potato
cores before getting cut in same
sizes.
Figure 1 This is a picture of potato
cores cut in same sizes
Figure 4 This pictures shows one
potato core.
Figure 3 This shows 6groups of 4
potato cores.
Figure 5 This is a picture of the
electronic balance zeroed out with
the tray on it. This was before we
measured each groups of potato
cores.
Figure 6 This is a picture of a group
of potato cores on the electronic
balance.
Figure 8 This is another set of
potato cores on the electronic
balance.
Figure 7 This is the organized data
with errors for each groups of
potato cores.
Figure 10 This is a picture of the
cup labeled with water and the
graduated cylinder.
Figure 9 This is a picture of our
independent variables, which is the
concentration of the sucrose.
Figure 11 This is a picture of the
potato cores after 24 hours in .2
concentration of sucrose on the
electronic balance.
Figure 12 This is a picture of the
potato cores after 24 hours in .4
concentration of sucrose on the
electronic balance.
Figure 14 This is a picture of the
potato cores after 24 hours in .6
concentration of sucrose on the
electronic balance.
Figure 13 This is a picture of the
potato cores after 24 hours in .8
concentration of sucrose on the
electronic balance.
Figure 16 This is a picture of the
potato cores after 24 hours in 1.0
concentration of sucrose on the
electronic balance.
Figure 15 This is a picture of the
potato cores after 24 hours in water
on the electronic balance.
Data Chart:
Concentration Percentage Change
0 39.13 %
.2 25 %
.4 13.04 %
.6 -‐4.35 %
.8 9.09 %
1.0 -‐13.04 %
Table 1 This table shows our final results.
Graph 1 This graph shows our final result. It is not the
best result we have expected. Something went wrong during
our lab.
Graph 2 This is the graph of the group's result. As shown, our X-
intercept is way off of others. We are group 1.
Conclusion:
Analysis of results and graph:
Analysis
Result The results were quite ambiguous and vague. It was hard to
conclude that the more hypertonic potato cores are to sucrose
solution, the more weight potato cores gain. Our X intercept
was quite off compared to other groups. However, we noticed
that the numbers were decreasing while the concentration was
higher, except for the one in the concentration 0.8. Other
groups’ points were around 0.2 to 0.4. However, our point
was 0.75, which was way off of other groups’ points.
Graph Except for the point of potato cores in 0.8 concentration of
sucrose, which gave us a positive number, the graph shaped
similarly with other groups’ graph. Our group’s graph is
decreasing, except for the point of 0.8, which seems like a
mistake, just like what we had stated on the hypothesis. Also
as shown above, the graph shows significant difference
between our group’s x-‐intercept with other groups’.
Evaluation:
My Lab (method):
Generally the method seems to work well to get suitable results but part of it
could be improved to get even better results.
Limitation Improvement
The length of the potatoes might not
be all the same.
Try 3~4 times to get as accurate
results as possible.
Not enough experiments with different
independent variables.
Conduct the experiment adapting 6
different independent variables.
Experiment under the same
independent variable was only
conducted one times.
Repeat the same experiment 3~4
times.
The amount of each concentration
might not be exact and same.
Check the graduated cylinder more
than once to get as exact as possible.
The electronic mass kept on changing
from 2.2-‐2.4 g
Wait 1 minute then record what we
see.
Reliability:
Generally the method seems to work well to get suitable results but parts of
it were not reliable. We made an effort to make the experiment as accurate
as possible. However, once again, shown in the graph, there was a mistake in
either measuring or reading. If we were to have more time and would
conducted more experiments, we could have gotten better, more exact results.
Result:
The result was also generally satisfying because it supported parts of my
hypothesis. However some results were a little vague to conclude. As seen in
the graph above, the results did not follow a significant pattern. However we
could conclude that the graph was decreasing just like other groups’ works.
Our result somehow supports our hypothesis, which is the more hypertonic
potato cores are to sucrose solution, the more weight potato cores gain. On
the other hand, potato cores will decrease in weight when it is hypotonic to
sucrose solution.
Suggestion:
For better quality of the experiment and for more exact, accurate results, we
should have done the experience 3~4 times and get the average and delete
the more extreme results, like what we got for the potato cores in 0.8
sucrose.