osteological indicators of prehensility in theria and the identification of prehensility in fossil...

26
OSTEOLOGICAL INDICATORS OF PREHENSILITY IN THERIA AND THE IDENTIFICATION OF PREHENSILITY IN FOSSIL TAXA M. Spaulding

Upload: primrose-chase

Post on 28-Dec-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: OSTEOLOGICAL INDICATORS OF PREHENSILITY IN THERIA AND THE IDENTIFICATION OF PREHENSILITY IN FOSSIL TAXA M. Spaulding

OSTEOLOGICAL INDICATORS OF PREHENSILITY IN THERIA AND THE IDENTIFICATION OF

PREHENSILITY IN FOSSIL TAXA

M. Spaulding

Page 2: OSTEOLOGICAL INDICATORS OF PREHENSILITY IN THERIA AND THE IDENTIFICATION OF PREHENSILITY IN FOSSIL TAXA M. Spaulding

Prehensile Semi-Prehensile

?

Page 3: OSTEOLOGICAL INDICATORS OF PREHENSILITY IN THERIA AND THE IDENTIFICATION OF PREHENSILITY IN FOSSIL TAXA M. Spaulding

Multiple Origins of Prehensility

Page 4: OSTEOLOGICAL INDICATORS OF PREHENSILITY IN THERIA AND THE IDENTIFICATION OF PREHENSILITY IN FOSSIL TAXA M. Spaulding

Minimum8 eventsIn 6 orders

Page 5: OSTEOLOGICAL INDICATORS OF PREHENSILITY IN THERIA AND THE IDENTIFICATION OF PREHENSILITY IN FOSSIL TAXA M. Spaulding

Prehensility in the fossil record?

?

Page 6: OSTEOLOGICAL INDICATORS OF PREHENSILITY IN THERIA AND THE IDENTIFICATION OF PREHENSILITY IN FOSSIL TAXA M. Spaulding

Convergence

Page 7: OSTEOLOGICAL INDICATORS OF PREHENSILITY IN THERIA AND THE IDENTIFICATION OF PREHENSILITY IN FOSSIL TAXA M. Spaulding

Previous Work

Primates Carnivorans

Page 8: OSTEOLOGICAL INDICATORS OF PREHENSILITY IN THERIA AND THE IDENTIFICATION OF PREHENSILITY IN FOSSIL TAXA M. Spaulding

Tail Terminology3 regions of the tail

Proximal region

From 1st caudal to transitional

Transitional region

After transitional to longest caudal

Distal region

After longest caudal

Page 9: OSTEOLOGICAL INDICATORS OF PREHENSILITY IN THERIA AND THE IDENTIFICATION OF PREHENSILITY IN FOSSIL TAXA M. Spaulding

Transitional Vertebra

Proximal Transitional

Page 10: OSTEOLOGICAL INDICATORS OF PREHENSILITY IN THERIA AND THE IDENTIFICATION OF PREHENSILITY IN FOSSIL TAXA M. Spaulding

Tail Terminology3 regions of the tail

Proximal region

From 1st caudal to transitional

Transitional region

After transitional to longest caudal

Distal region

After longest caudal

Page 11: OSTEOLOGICAL INDICATORS OF PREHENSILITY IN THERIA AND THE IDENTIFICATION OF PREHENSILITY IN FOSSIL TAXA M. Spaulding

Phylogenetically Independent Osteological Indicators

1. Long tail compared to body2. Long proximal section3. Short transitional section4. Well developed transverse processes5. Increase in robusticity6. Sacral features

Number of vertebrae touching pelvis Size of sacral foramen

Page 12: OSTEOLOGICAL INDICATORS OF PREHENSILITY IN THERIA AND THE IDENTIFICATION OF PREHENSILITY IN FOSSIL TAXA M. Spaulding

Testing

Page 13: OSTEOLOGICAL INDICATORS OF PREHENSILITY IN THERIA AND THE IDENTIFICATION OF PREHENSILITY IN FOSSIL TAXA M. Spaulding

Results

Page 14: OSTEOLOGICAL INDICATORS OF PREHENSILITY IN THERIA AND THE IDENTIFICATION OF PREHENSILITY IN FOSSIL TAXA M. Spaulding

Tail Length

Percentage of body length

Page 15: OSTEOLOGICAL INDICATORS OF PREHENSILITY IN THERIA AND THE IDENTIFICATION OF PREHENSILITY IN FOSSIL TAXA M. Spaulding

Relative Section Lengths

Proximal Transitional

Page 16: OSTEOLOGICAL INDICATORS OF PREHENSILITY IN THERIA AND THE IDENTIFICATION OF PREHENSILITY IN FOSSIL TAXA M. Spaulding

Proximal Section % minus Transitional Section % (% of body length)

Page 17: OSTEOLOGICAL INDICATORS OF PREHENSILITY IN THERIA AND THE IDENTIFICATION OF PREHENSILITY IN FOSSIL TAXA M. Spaulding

Development of Transverse Processes

Page 18: OSTEOLOGICAL INDICATORS OF PREHENSILITY IN THERIA AND THE IDENTIFICATION OF PREHENSILITY IN FOSSIL TAXA M. Spaulding

Robusticity of distal caudals

Percent of tail length

Robusticity

Page 19: OSTEOLOGICAL INDICATORS OF PREHENSILITY IN THERIA AND THE IDENTIFICATION OF PREHENSILITY IN FOSSIL TAXA M. Spaulding

Sacral features

Page 20: OSTEOLOGICAL INDICATORS OF PREHENSILITY IN THERIA AND THE IDENTIFICATION OF PREHENSILITY IN FOSSIL TAXA M. Spaulding

Phylogenetically Independent Osteological Indicators

1. Long tail compared to body2. Long proximal section3. Short transitional section4. Well developed transverse processes5. Increase in robusticity6. Sacral features

Number of vertebrae touching pelvis Size of sacral foramen

Page 21: OSTEOLOGICAL INDICATORS OF PREHENSILITY IN THERIA AND THE IDENTIFICATION OF PREHENSILITY IN FOSSIL TAXA M. Spaulding

Green River Formation,Wyoming52.5 Ma“cimolestid”

Spaulding et. al 2008Spaulding, Flynn, and Grande. In prep.

Page 22: OSTEOLOGICAL INDICATORS OF PREHENSILITY IN THERIA AND THE IDENTIFICATION OF PREHENSILITY IN FOSSIL TAXA M. Spaulding

Tail Length

Section Lengths

Page 23: OSTEOLOGICAL INDICATORS OF PREHENSILITY IN THERIA AND THE IDENTIFICATION OF PREHENSILITY IN FOSSIL TAXA M. Spaulding

Robusticity of distal caduals

Percent of tail length

Robusticity

Page 24: OSTEOLOGICAL INDICATORS OF PREHENSILITY IN THERIA AND THE IDENTIFICATION OF PREHENSILITY IN FOSSIL TAXA M. Spaulding

Its Prehensile!

• 51 caudal vertebrae!• Long proximal section

compared to transitional

• Well developed distal transverse processes

• Increase in robusticity

Page 25: OSTEOLOGICAL INDICATORS OF PREHENSILITY IN THERIA AND THE IDENTIFICATION OF PREHENSILITY IN FOSSIL TAXA M. Spaulding

Conclusions

• Suite of features for identifying prehensility in fossils identified.

• Features both applicable intra and inter ordinally

• Identification of prehensility in fossil ‘cimolestid’

Page 26: OSTEOLOGICAL INDICATORS OF PREHENSILITY IN THERIA AND THE IDENTIFICATION OF PREHENSILITY IN FOSSIL TAXA M. Spaulding

Acknowledgements

• Access to collections and specimens: Carnegie Museum of Natural History - Dr. Zhe-xi Lou, Alan Tabrum, and Amy C. Henrici; The Field Museum of Natural History - Dr. Lance Grande and William F. Simpson; AMNH: Ivy Rutzky, Carl Mehling, Dr. Chris Norris, Ruth O’Leary, Judy Galkin, and Susan Bell. Eileen Westwig, Darrin Lunde, Neil Duncan, Catherine Doyle-Capitman, and Dr. Robert Voss, Ana Barcel, Jeanne Kelly, Amy Davidson, Dr. Robert Evander, Justy Alicea, Edward Pedersen, Lorraine Meeker, and Chester Tarka.

• Funding: Columbia University and the National Science Foundation, NSF Graduate student fellowship and two awards to J. Flynn