outcome-based pathways & outcome-based...
TRANSCRIPT
Outcome-Based Pathways & Outcome-Based Reimbursement
Proof of Concept Lessons Learned
20 June 2013 David Fry, Director Client Services Heather Binkle, Program Lead, eHealth Strategy
Acknowledgement
Materials included in today’s session reflect content generated from the
Service Provider Organizations and CCACs engaged in the Provincial OBP/OBR
Proof of Concept
Objectives • To continue to prepare CCAC’s and Service Provider
Organizations to implement OBP/OBR • To identify and share early data from participating CCACs
and Service Provider Organizations from the Proof of Concept for Outcome-Based Pathways
• To provide an overview of the OBP/OBR
Implementation Roadmap
Qualifiers
• Lessons identified from:
– January 25th Lessons Learned Event NSM/Central CCACs and Partner Providers
– May 24th Champlain CCAC and Partner Providers Day 0 Information Session
– Provincial OBP/OBR Implementation Working Group Discussions (September 2012 – May 2013)
– Volunteer SPO and CCAC POC site leads
Background
Creating change through eHealth programs
Driving change
Setting the stage for change
Action Plan & Drummond Report: Streamlining processes, paying for
quality; “obsessively patient-centred” care, seniors strategy
Strengthening Home Care Services in Ontario Strategy • Accountability • Better health
outcomes • Innovation and
flexibility in service provision
• Strengthening quality
2008
Excellent Care for All Act (ECFAA) • Quality and
accountability • Expanded role for
HQO
Health System Funding Reform Accelerating move to patient-based
funding
2010 February 2012 2012-2014
Enhancing the client experience, improving outcomes and providing better value for money
Accelerating Transformation
ICCP Client Care Model
Care Coordinati
on
CCAC Expanded
Role I&R QVHC OBP-OBR
Transformation Begins
at Home
Health Links
Home & Community Care Drivers
Quality &
Value in Home Care
The goal –
to better facilitate:
• Team-based care
• Improved health outcomes
• Quality measures
• Innovation in the home and community sector
Nursing Personal Support
Therapies Community Programs &
Primary Care Providers
Team-based care in the patient’s home (“Circle of Care”)
27
Development Cycles
Outcome-Based Pathway
Outcome-Based Pathways identify the indicators for a patient’s episode of care that are expected to be achieved through the application of best practice guidelines, business and patient care efficiencies and innovations. The result is that patients will receive care of greater value, patient-centric and outcomes-driven. OBPs identify outcomes and process outputs for both the CCAC Care Coordinator and Service Provider Organization (SPO) team member in order to better meet the patient’s needs.
Outcome-Based Reimbursement
Traditionally, providers are paid based on a ‘fee for service’ model (i.e. reconciliation of service, visit frequencies and billing code submitted).
Outcome Based Reimbursement (OBR) occurs when an SPO is paid based on achieving the outcomes (determined by evidence-based, best practice guidelines) or provision of best practice at certain intervals, including the final milestone. Current Reimbursement Framework is relevant to Short Stay Clients only. Goals of OBR: • Design a reimbursement framework that incents a greater focus on producing high quality outcomes and improving cost efficiency; • Create a framework in which both the CCACs and SPOs share in efficiency gains achieved
10
OBP/OBR Early Adoption Proof of Concept Sites
Early Adoption Site Business Change Go-live
Pathways
Central 26 Nov 2012 Wound NSM 26 Nov 2012 Wound and Ortho
South East 21 Jan 2013 Ortho Mississauga Halton 31 Jan 2013 Wound
Champlain 11 Feb 2013 Wound and Ortho
Provincial Successes, Challenges &
Lessons Learned
Successes • Achieved significant movement towards clinical transformation across
multiple organizations.
• Collaborative provincial structures in place to support both strategic and operational work.
• Completed point-of-care testing that informed revisions to the Outcome-
Based Pathway content.
• Joint SPO/CCAC opportunity to directly inform business requirement enhancements for technology.
Challenges– Key Themes • Perceived inconsistency in vision and value of OBP/OBR as a future state.
• Required significant provincial implementation structures that were sector
wide that focused on clinical transformation across multiple organizations. • Governance model evolved during the implementation process. • Magnitude and pace of change is high and includes conceptual and business
process elements with significant impact to frontline. • Local variation in key processes posed challenges to SPOs looking to
standardize across multiple geographies. • Technology was not yet mature enough to fully support the efficiencies and
practice shifts in alignment with OBP/OBR.
5 C’s for OBP/OBR Implementation Success
Change management – Acknowledge the practice shift underway & level set expectations (“challenging work ahead”)
Collaboration - Joint work creates trust, respect, better understanding and helps get the work done efficiently
Communication –Regular and frequent updates at all levels and in multiple vehicles
Consistency – Provincial agreement to follow key business rules; need to focus on valuable key consistency elements only
Cross-portfolio Planning & Resources – Expertise across organizational departments
OUTCOME-BASED PATHWAYS – EARLY DATA
OBP/OBR POC Early Data
OACCAC June 2013
18
Current State Introduction
• The following slides examine the current state of POC to date; this includes the following:
• All Wound and Orthopedic OBP categorized using the CHRIS functionality from November 28th, 2012 to June 3, 2013
• All non-cancelled OBPs • Both Discharged and Active Pathways • Data from 5 CCACs are included – CCAC volumes vary
across the province due to the staggered POC start
19
Current State to Date: Wounds - Volumes
Count of Pathways CCAC Pathways Type MH CENT CHAM NSM Total
Arterial Leg Ulcer 18 54 13 11 96 Assessment 329 769 183 286 1567
Diabetic Foot Ulcer 99 259 122 64 544 Maintenance Wound
Initial 1 116 35 152
Maintenance Wound Recurring 14 3 17
Malignant Wound Initial 6 34 2 42
Malignant Wound Recurring 1 2 3
Non-Healing Wound Initial 5 18 1 24
Non-Healing Wound Recurring 3 8 2 13
Pilonidal Sinus 104 232 120 51 507 Pressure Ulcer 145 525 120 52 842
Surgical Wound 491 1389 789 304 2973 Traumatic Wound 168 639 307 132 1246 Venous Leg Ulcer 73 292 112 54 531
Grand Total 1443 4351 1766 997 8557
20
1%
18%
6% 2%
0% 1% 0%
0%
0%
6%
10% 35%
15%
6%
Proportion of All Wound Pathways across 4 POC sites
Arterial Leg Ulcer
Assessment
Diabetic Foot Ulcer
Maintenance Wound Initial
Maintenance Wound Recurring
Malignant Wound Initial
Malignant Wound Recurring
Non-Healing Wound Initial
Non-Healing Wound Recurring
Pilonidal Sinus
Pressure Ulcer
Surgical Wound
Traumatic Wound
Venous Leg Ulcer
• As of June 3rd, there has been over 8,500 wound outcome-based pathways ordered across 4 CCACs
Client Care Model
21
Current State to Date: Wounds -Populations
• To examine the distribution of CCM population at the start of the wound pathway, only data from 2 CCACs could be included, due to varying exclusion POC criteria
22
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
% o
f Pat
hway
s
Client Population at the Start of Wound Pathways MH and CENT CCACs only
Adult - Complex
Adult - Chronic
Adult - Community Independence
Adult - Short Stay
Current State to Date: Orthopedic
Count of Pathways CCAC Pathways SE CHAM NSM Total Total Hip
Replacement Post-Op
53 123 218 394
Total Hip Replacement Pre-Op 148 148
Total Knee Replacement
Post-Op 121 145 47 313
Grand Total 174 268 413 855
23
• As of June 3rd, there has been over 850 Orthopedic outcome-based pathways ordered across 3 CCACs
• 98% of Ortho Pathways started as Short Stay Population
46%
17%
37%
Proportion of All Ortho Pathways across 3 POC sites
Total Hip ReplacementPost-Op
Total Hip ReplacementPre-Op
Total Knee ReplacementPost-Op
Length of Stay Introduction
• The following slides examine information related to length of stay; however, given that POC has been 6 months, the following data criteria applied for Length of Stay analysis:
• Only those pathways whose “Day X” was prior to May 15th, 2013 are included
• Pathways may be either discharged or still active • For pathways that are discharged, all pathway discharge dispositions
are included
24
Pathway Max Pathway Start Date Arterial Leg Ulcer 9-Jan-13
Assessment 4-May-13 Diabetic Foot Ulcer 9-Jan-13
Pilonidal Sinus 14-Feb-13 Pressure Ulcer 7-Nov-12
Surgical Wound 14-Feb-13 Traumatic Wound 14-Feb-13 Venous Leg Ulcer 19-Dec-12
Total Hip Replacement Post-Op 9-Jan-13 Total Hip Replacement Pre-Op 3-Apr-13
Total Knee Replacement Post-Op 9-Jan-13
Length of Stay Wound Pathways
25
Pathways Count of Pathways
# Pathways Discharged
Expected Pathway LOS
(# Days)
Average pathway LOS
(# Days)
% Discharged within Pathway LOS
% Discharged within Day X
Arterial Leg Ulcer 19 19 84 78.47 47% 89% Diabetic Foot Ulcer 87 80 84 64.66 66% 84%
Pilonidal Sinus 159 153 60 44.22 67% 84% Surgical Wound 1003 973 60 41.50 75% 90%
Traumatic Wound 406 391 60 43.55 71% 87% Venous Leg Ulcer 67 61 98 59.93 72% 88%
Assessment 1417 1371 7 6.57 73% 82% Total 3158 3048 27.40 73% 86%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Arterial LegUlcer
Diabetic FootUlcer
PilonidalSinus
SurgicalWound
TraumaticWound
Venous LegUlcer
Assessment
% o
f Pat
hway
s
Discharge Dispositions Proportions
Not Yet Discharged as of June 3rd, 2013
Discharge: Transfer to different Pathway
Discharge: Pathway completed - goal not met
Discharge: Pathway completed - goal met
Only those pathways whose “Day X” was prior to May 15th, 2013 are included Pathways may be either discharged or still active For pathways that are discharged, all pathway discharge dispositions are included
Assessment Pathway Breakdown
Discharge: Pathway completed - goal met
Discharge: Pathway completed - goal not met
Discharge: Transfer to different Pathway
Not Yet Discharged as of June 3rd, ‘13 Total
Count of Pathways
Total %
CCAC Count of Pathways % Count of Pathways % Count of Pathways %
Count of Pathways %
6-MH 107 38% 37 13% 129 46% 6 2% 279 100%
8-CENT 239 34% 56 8% 381 53% 37 5% 713 100% 11-
CHAM 23 15% 9 6% 118 77% 3 2% 153 100% 12-
NSM 166 61% 7 3% 99 36% 0% 272 100% Grand Total 535 38% 109 8% 727 51% 46 3% 1417 100%
26
Length of Stay Orthopedics
27
Pathways Count of Pathways
# Pathways Discharged
Expected Pathway LOS
Average pathway LOS
% Discharged within Pathway
LOS
% Discharged within Day X
Total Hip Replacement Post-Op 49 49 84 56.59 90% 98%
Total Hip Replacement Pre-Op 108 108 28 12.83 99% 100%
Total Knee Replacement Post-Op 15 15 84 44.00 93% 100%
Grand Total 172 172 28.02 96% 99%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Total Hip ReplacementPost-Op
Total Hip ReplacementPre-Op
Total Knee ReplacementPost-Op
% o
f Pat
hway
s
Discharge Dispositions Proportions
Discharge: Pathway completed - goal not met
Discharge: Pathway completed - goal met
Only those pathways whose “Day X” was prior to May 15th, 2013 are included Pathways may be either discharged or still active For pathways that are discharged, all pathway discharge dispositions are included
Service Utilization Introduction
• The following slides examine information related to service utilization for discharged pathways; however, given that POC has been 6 months, the following data criteria applied for Length of Stay analysis: • Only those pathways whose “Day X” was prior to May
15th, 2013 are included • Only Discharged Pathways are included • All pathway discharge dispositions are included
28
Service Utilization: Single Service
29
Pathway # Discharged Pathways
% that were single service
Arterial Leg Ulcer 19 68% Assessment 1371 72%
Diabetic Foot Ulcer 80 66% Pilonidal Sinus 153 92%
Surgical Wound 973 81% Total Hip Replacement
Post-Op 49 27%
Total Hip Replacement Pre-Op 108 94%
Total Knee Replacement Post-Op 15 40%
Traumatic Wound 391 72% Venous Leg Ulcer 61 67%
Grand Total 3220 75%
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
% o
f Sin
gle
Serv
ice
Path
way
s
For pathways that were discharged with single service, what single service did they receive?
Other
SW
PT
OT
SLP
Nutrition
PSW
Nursing
Only those pathways whose “Day X” was prior to May 15th, 2013 are included Only Discharged Pathways are included All pathway discharge dispositions are included
Service Utilization: All discharged Pathways
30
Pathway # Discharged
Pathways Visit
Nursing Primary Care Nursing Clinic Nutrition OT PSW PT SLP SW Other
Arterial Leg Ulcer 19 24.8 0.2 0.0 0.4 7.4 0.5 0.0 0.2 0.1 Assessment 1371 2.8 0.5 0.0 0.1 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Diabetic Foot Ulcer 80 21.8 3.0 0.0 0.3 5.5 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 Pilonidal Sinus 153 11.2 8.5 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Surgical Wound 973 13.4 3.9 0.0 0.1 2.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Hip Replacement Post-Op 49 3.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 5.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Hip Replacement Pre-Op 108 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Knee Replacement Post-Op 15 3.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 Traumatic Wound 391 12.2 2.6 0.0 0.1 5.8 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Venous Leg Ulcer 61 17.4 2.0 0.0 0.2 9.5 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
Grand Total 3220 8.3 2.2 0.0 0.1 2.5 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
Only those pathways whose “Day X” was prior to May 15th, 2013 are included Only Discharged Pathways are included All pathway discharge dispositions are included
Pathway Outcomes Introduction
• The following slides examine the current state of POC outcomes to date; this includes the following:
• All Wound and Orthopedic OBP categorized using the CHRIS functionality from November 28th, 2012 to June 3, 2013
• All non-cancelled OBPs • Both Discharged and Active Pathways • Data from 5 CCACs are included • Percentage indicates proportion of outcomes met by
interval due date
31
Pathway Outcomes Wounds: Interval 1 and 2 % Met on Time
32
N=482 N=460 n=764 n=2763 n=1155 n=476 Interval 1 DFU Pilonidal Sinus Pressure Ulcer Surgical Traumatic VLU
Client Discharge Planning Initiated for Client Independence and Prevention 93% 98% 92% 96% 95% 89%
Compression Therapy Initiated N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 66% Correct outcome-based pathway confirmed 93% 98% 94% 96% 95% 91%
Holistic client and wound assessment completed 94% 98% 94% 97% 96% 91% Lower limb assessment completed 82% N/A N/A N/A N/A 83%
Pressure redistribution measures initiated 88% N/A 92% N/A N/A N/A Root cause of trauma identified and addressed N/A N/A N/A N/A 95% N/A
Wound Measurement Completed 95% 98% 96% 97% 96% 91% Wound Therapy Initiated 94% 98% 93% 97% 96% 90%
n=390 n=405 n=605 n=2420 n=996 n=401 Interval 2 DFU Pilonidal Sinus Pressure Ulcer Surgical Traumatic VLU
Chronic disease self-management plan initiated 73% N/A 82% N/A N/A N/A Referral initiated for long-term compression system N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 68%
Referral Initiated for Long-Term Pressure Redistribution System 68% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Wound Healing Percentage >=20% 54% 80% 70% 78% 74% 65%
• Outcomes in Bold are Payment-Linked Outcomes • All Wound and Orthopedic OBP categorized using the CHRIS functionality from November 28th, 2012 to June 3, 2013 included • All non-cancelled OBPs and Both Discharged and Active Pathways included
Pathway Outcomes Wounds: Interval 3 and 4 % Met on Time
33
n=243 n=350 n=410 n=2073 n=850 n=279 Interval 3 DFU Pilonidal Sinus Pressure Ulcer Surgical Traumatic VLU
Client has obtained and is adhering to pressure redistribution system 66% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Wound Healing Percentage = 100% OR Wound Healing Percentage >=70% for Pressure Ulcer 44% 61% 78% 71% 73% 53%
n=0 n=0 n=350 n=0 n=0 n=245 Interval 4 DFU Pilonidal Sinus Pressure Ulcer Surgical Traumatic VLU
Client is independent with long-term compression system by week 14 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 62%
Wound Healing Percentage = 100% N/A N/A 78% N/A N/A N/A
• Outcomes in Bold are Payment-Linked Outcomes • All Wound and Orthopedic OBP categorized using the CHRIS functionality from November 28th, 2012 to June 3, 2013 included • All non-cancelled OBPs and Both Discharged and Active Pathways included
Pathway Outcomes Ortho – All Intervals - % Met on Time
34
• All Wound and Orthopedic OBP categorized using the CHRIS functionality from November 28th, 2012 to June 3, 2013 included • All non-cancelled OBPs and Both Discharged and Active Pathways included
n=385 n=143 n=310
Interval 1 Total Hip Replacement Post Op
Total Hip Replacement Pre-Op
Total Knee Replacement Post-Op
Client demonstrates safe mobility using mobility and ambulation equipment maintaining prescribed surgical hip precautions 98% N/A N/A
Client demonstrates safe mobility using mobility and ambulation equipment maintaining prescribed surgical knee precautions N/A N/A 98%
Client/family/caregiver demonstrates knowledge of equipment needed post-operatively N/A 100% N/A Completed Physiotherapy assessment 99% N/A 98%
Pre-Operative Assessment N/A 97% N/A
n=253 n=287
Interval 2 Total Hip Replacement Post Op
Total Knee Replacement Post-Op
Client demonstrates 90 degrees or greater knee flexion N/A 79% Client demonstrates a functional level of safe mobility with or without gait aid 98% N/A
Client demonstrates independence in activities of daily living with or without assistive devices 97% N/A Client is connected to additional services/resources to address ongoing or unmet needs 91% N/A
Surgical wound is healed 93% N/A
n=0 n=253
Interval 3 Total Hip Replacement Post Op
Total Knee Replacement Post-Op
Client demonstrates a functional level of safe mobility with or without gait aid N/A 98% Client demonstrates independence in activities of daily living with or without assistive devices N/A 91%
Client is connected to additional services/resources to address ongoing or unmet needs N/A 94% Surgical wound is healed N/A 78%
• Early days for data analysis • System solution is not yet fully supporting
solution • Local variation in business processes
continues to impact data • Must be cautious with any definitive
statements • Data is supporting some of our expectations
Conclusions