outflows and feedback smita mathur ohio state [yair krongold et al. 2007 apj 659, 1022]
Post on 21-Dec-2015
218 views
TRANSCRIPT
Outflows and Feedback
Smita MathurOhio State
[Yair Krongold et al. 2007 ApJ 659, 1022]
Feedback from AGNs
Absolutely necessary to explain a variety of astronomical observations:
- M-- relation
- cluster cooling flows
- sizes of galaxies
- star formation rates
- enrichment of IGM
Methods of Feedback Jets : accepted for cluster cooling flows.
Outflows are ubiquitous
Seen in 50% of Seyfert galaxies.
NGC 3783 HST and FUSE
Do outflows carry sufficient energy and momentum to be effective agents of feedback?
Parameters we need to know:
Mass
Velocity
Column density of ions
Total column density
Mass
Ionization correction
Geometry Metallicity
What is the distance of the absorber from the nucleus?
Proposals span a factor of > 106
from accretion disk to Kpc scale
narrow line region
n R2
Variability
Density Distance
XMM Observations of NGC 4051
• RGS High resolution spectrum
• EPIC Variability
R (HIP) = 0.5-1.0 lt days. (2300-4600 RS)
R (LIP) = < 3.5 lt days. (< 15800 RS)
BH mass in NGC 4051 is 2 x 106 M⊙
The outflow is clearly compact
…consistent with an accretion disk origin.
Rule out various models:
- wind off torus edge (Krolik & Kriss)
- continuous range of ionization
parameter
Mass & Energy outflow rates
HIP & LIP mass outflow rates:
~ 1 x 10-4 M⊙ yr-1
c.f. accretion rate: ~ 5 x 10-3 M⊙ yr-1
Kinetic power released: ~1038 erg/s
c.f. bolometric luminosity: 2.5 x 1043 erg/s
Energy injection rate in the surrounding medium is significantly smaller than that in feedback models
ScannapiecoSilk
What about luminous quasars?
Total energy output: ~ 1057 erg.
(if outflow to accretion rate is the same as in NGC 4051)
c.f. feedback requirement of ~ 1060 erg
Hopkins et al
Scannapieco et al.
The measured energy output
falls significantly short of what’s
needed for effective feedback
unless………..
1. Outflow rate does not scale simply with
accretion rate
2. We observe outflow before it is fully accelerated.
In NGC 4051 vwind << vescape
How common is this?
Are powerful quasars different?