outline mana gement · 2013. 11. 10. · inventory models for independent demand ... basic eoq...
TRANSCRIPT
1212 Inventory Inventory 1212 yManagement
yManagementgg
PowerPoint presentation to accompany PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and Render Heizer and Render Operations Management, 10e Operations Management, 10e Principles of Operations Management, 8ePrinciples of Operations Management, 8e
PowerPoint slides by Jeff Heyl
12 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
OutlineOutlineOutlineOutline Global Company Profile: Global Company Profile:
Amazon.com The Importance of Inventory
Functions of Inventory Functions of Inventory Types of Inventory
12 - 2© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
OutlineOutline –– ContinuedContinuedOutline Outline –– ContinuedContinued Managing Inventory Managing Inventory
ABC Analysis Record Accuracy Cycle Counting Cycle Counting Control of Service Inventories
Inventory Models I d d t D d t D d Independent vs. Dependent Demand Holding, Ordering, and Setup Costs
12 - 3© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
OutlineOutline –– ContinuedContinuedOutline Outline –– ContinuedContinued
Inventory Models for Independent Demand The Basic Economic Order Quantity
(EOQ) Model(EOQ) Model Minimizing Costs Reorder Points Production Order Quantity Model Production Order Quantity Model Quantity Discount Models
12 - 4© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
OutlineOutline –– ContinuedContinuedOutline Outline –– ContinuedContinued
Probabilistic Models and Safety StockStock Other Probabilistic Models
Single-Period Model Fi d P i d (P) S t Fixed-Period (P) Systems
12 - 5© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Learning ObjectivesLearning ObjectivesLearning ObjectivesLearning ObjectivesWhen you complete this chapter youWhen you complete this chapter youWhen you complete this chapter you When you complete this chapter you should be able to:should be able to:
1. Conduct an ABC analysis2. Explain and use cycle counting3 Explain and use the EOQ model for3. Explain and use the EOQ model for
independent inventory demand4 Compute a reorder point and safety4. Compute a reorder point and safety
stock
12 - 6© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Learning ObjectivesLearning ObjectivesLearning ObjectivesLearning ObjectivesWhen you complete this chapter youWhen you complete this chapter youWhen you complete this chapter you When you complete this chapter you should be able to:should be able to:
5. Apply the production order quantity modelmodel
6. Explain and use the quantity di t d ldiscount model
7. Understand service levels and probabilistic inventory models
12 - 7© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Amazon comAmazon comAmazon.comAmazon.com
Amazon.com started as a “virtual” retailer – no inventory, no y,warehouses, no overhead; just computers taking orders to be filledcomputers taking orders to be filled by others
G th h f d A t Growth has forced Amazon.com to become a world leader in
h i d i twarehousing and inventory management
12 - 8© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Amazon comAmazon comAmazon.comAmazon.com1 Each order is assigned by computer to1. Each order is assigned by computer to
the closest distribution center that has the product(s)p ( )
2. A “flow meister” at each distribution center assigns work crewscenter assigns work crews
3. Lights indicate products that are to be picked and the light is resetpicked and the light is reset
4. Items are placed in crates on a conveyor, b d h it 15bar code scanners scan each item 15 times to virtually eliminate errors
12 - 9© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Amazon comAmazon comAmazon.comAmazon.com
5. Crates arrive at central point where items are boxed and labeled with new bar codeare boxed and labeled with new bar code
6. Gift wrapping is done by hand at 30 packages per hourpackages per hour
7. Completed boxes are packed, taped, i h d d l b l d b f l iweighed and labeled before leaving
warehouse in a truck8. Order arrives at customer within 2 - 3
days
12 - 10© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
I t M tI t M tInventory ManagementInventory Management
The objective of inventoryThe objective of inventoryThe objective of inventory The objective of inventory management is to strike a balance management is to strike a balance between inventory investment andbetween inventory investment andbetween inventory investment and between inventory investment and
customer servicecustomer service
12 - 11© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Importance of InventoryImportance of InventoryImportance of InventoryImportance of Inventory
One of the most expensive assets of many companies representing asof many companies representing as much as 50% of total invested
it lcapital Operations managers must balance Ope at o s a age s ust ba a ce
inventory investment and customer serviceservice
12 - 12© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Functions of InventoryFunctions of InventoryFunctions of InventoryFunctions of Inventory1 To decouple or separate various1. To decouple or separate various
parts of the production process2. To decouple the firm from
fluctuations in demand andfluctuations in demand and provide a stock of goods that will provide a selection for customersprovide a selection for customers
3. To take advantage of quantity di tdiscounts
4. To hedge against inflation12 - 13© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
4. To hedge against inflation
Types of InventoryTypes of InventoryTypes of InventoryTypes of Inventory Raw material Raw material
Purchased but not processed W k i Work-in-process
Undergone some change but not completed A function of cycle time for a product
Maintenance/repair/operating (MRO) p p g ( ) Necessary to keep machinery and
processes productivep p Finished goods
Completed product awaiting shipment12 - 14© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Completed product awaiting shipment
The Material Flo C cleThe Material Flo C cleThe Material Flow CycleThe Material Flow Cycle
Cycle timey
95% 5%
Input Wait for Wait to Move Wait in queue Setup Run Outputinspection be moved time for operator time time
12 - 15© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Figure 12.1
M i I tM i I tManaging Inventory Managing Inventory
1. How inventory items can be yclassified
2 How accurate inventory records2. How accurate inventory records can be maintained
12 - 16© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
ABC AnalysisABC AnalysisABC AnalysisABC Analysis Divides inventory into three classes Divides inventory into three classes
based on annual dollar volume Class A - high annual dollar volume Class B - medium annual dollar Class B medium annual dollar
volume Class C low annual dollar volume Class C - low annual dollar volume
Used to establish policies that focus on the few critical parts and not the many trivial ones
12 - 17© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
ABC AnalysisABC AnalysisABC AnalysisABC Analysis
Item Stock
Percent of Number of
ItemsAnnual Volume Unit
Annual Dollar
Percent of Annual DollarStock
NumberItems
StockedVolume (units) x
Unit Cost =
Dollar Volume
Dollar Volume Class
#10286 20% 1,000 $ 90.00 $ 90,000 38.8% A72%
#11526 500 154.00 77,000 33.2% A
#12760 1,550 17.00 26,350 11.3% B
#10867 30% 350 42.86 15,001 6.4% B
#10500 1,000 12.50 12,500 5.4% B
23%
12 - 18© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
ABC AnalysisABC AnalysisABC AnalysisABC Analysis
Item Stock
Percent of Number of
ItemsAnnual Volume Unit
Annual Dollar
Percent of Annual DollarStock
NumberItems
StockedVolume (units) x
Unit Cost =
Dollar Volume
Dollar Volume Class
#12572 600 $ 14.17 $ 8,502 3.7% C
#14075 2,000 .60 1,200 .5% C
#01036 50% 100 8.50 850 .4% C5%
#01307 1,200 .42 504 .2% C
#10572 250 .60 150 .1% C
8,550 $232,057 100.0%
12 - 19© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
ABC AnalysisABC AnalysisABC AnalysisABC Analysis
A Items
r usa
ge
80 –70
al d
olla
r 70 –60 –50 –
of a
nnua
50 40 –30 –
C ItemsB Items
erce
nt o 20 –
10 –0 | | | | | | | | | |
Pe 0 – | | | | | | | | | |
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Percent of inventory items
12 - 20© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Percent of inventory itemsFigure 12.2
ABC AnalysisABC AnalysisABC AnalysisABC Analysis
Other criteria than annual dollar volume may be usedvolume may be used Anticipated engineering changes Delivery problems Quality problems Quality problems High unit cost
12 - 21© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
ABC AnalysisABC AnalysisABC AnalysisABC Analysis
Policies employed may include More emphasis on supplier
development for A items Tighter physical inventory control for
A items More care in forecasting A items
12 - 22© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Record AccuracyRecord AccuracyRecord AccuracyRecord Accuracy Accurate records are a critical
i di t i d ti d i tingredient in production and inventory systems
Allows organization to focus on what is needed
Necessary to make precise decisions about ordering, scheduling, and shipping
Incoming and outgoing record co g a d outgo g eco dkeeping must be accurate
Stockrooms should be secure12 - 23© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Stockrooms should be secure
Cycle CountingCycle Countingy gy g Items are counted and records updated
on a periodic basison a periodic basis Often used with ABC analysis
t d t i lto determine cycle Has several advantages
1. Eliminates shutdowns and interruptions2 Eliminates annual inventory adjustment2. Eliminates annual inventory adjustment3. Trained personnel audit inventory accuracy4 Allows causes of errors to be identified and4. Allows causes of errors to be identified and
corrected5 Maintains accurate inventory records
12 - 24© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
5. Maintains accurate inventory records
Cycle Counting ExampleCycle Counting ExampleCycle Counting ExampleCycle Counting Example5 000 it i i t 500 A it 1 750 B it 2 750 C5,000 items in inventory, 500 A items, 1,750 B items, 2,750 C itemsPolicy is to count A items every month (20 working days), B y y ( g y ),items every quarter (60 days), and C items every six months (120 days)
Item Class Quantity Cycle Counting Policy
Number of Items Counted per Day
A 500 Each month 500/20 = 25/day
B 1,750 Each quarter 1,750/60 = 29/day
C 2,750 Every 6 months 2,750/120 = 23/day77/day
12 - 25© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Control of ServiceControl of ServiceControl of Service Control of Service InventoriesInventories
Can be a critical component of profitabilityof profitability
Losses may come from shrinkage or pilferageshrinkage or pilferage
Applicable techniques include1. Good personnel selection, training, and
discipline2. Tight control on incoming shipments3. Effective control on all goods leaving
f ilit12 - 26© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
facility
Independent VersusIndependent VersusIndependent Versus Independent Versus Dependent DemandDependent Demandpp
Independent demandIndependent demand - the ppdemand for item is independent of the demand for any other of the demand for any other item in inventory
D d t d dD d t d d th Dependent demandDependent demand - the demand for item is dependent
th d d fupon the demand for some other item in the inventory
12 - 27© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Holding Ordering andHolding Ordering andHolding, Ordering, and Holding, Ordering, and Setup CostsSetup Costspp
Holding costsHolding costs - the costs of holding gg gor “carrying” inventory over time
Ordering costsOrdering costs the costs of Ordering costsOrdering costs - the costs of placing an order and receiving
dgoods Setup costsSetup costs - cost to prepare a pp p p
machine or process for manufacturing an order
12 - 28© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
manufacturing an order
Holding CostsHolding CostsHolding CostsHolding CostsC ( )
Category
Cost (and range) as a Percent of Inventory Value
Housing costs (building rent or depreciation, operating costs, taxes, insurance)
6% (3 - 10%)
Material handling costs (equipment lease or depreciation, power, operating cost)
3% (1 - 3.5%)
Labor cost 3% (3 - 5%)Labor cost 3% (3 5%)Investment costs (borrowing costs, taxes, and insurance on inventory)
11% (6 - 24%)
Pilferage, space, and obsolescence 3% (2 - 5%)Overall carrying cost 26%
12 - 29© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice HallTable 12.1
Holding CostsHolding CostsHolding CostsHolding CostsC ( )
Category
Cost (and range) as a Percent of Inventory Value
Housing costs (building rent or depreciation, operating costs, taxes, insurance)
6% (3 - 10%)
Material handling costs (equipment lease or depreciation, power, operating cost)
3% (1 - 3.5%)
Labor cost 3% (3 - 5%)Labor cost 3% (3 5%)Investment costs (borrowing costs, taxes, and insurance on inventory)
11% (6 - 24%)
Pilferage, space, and obsolescence 3% (2 - 5%)Overall carrying cost 26%
12 - 30© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice HallTable 12.1
Inventory Models forInventory Models forInventory Models for Inventory Models for Independent DemandIndependent Demanddepe de t e a ddepe de t e a d
Need to determine when and howNeed to determine when and howNeed to determine when and how Need to determine when and how much to ordermuch to order
1. Basic economic order quantity2. Production order quantity3. Quantity discount model
12 - 31© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Basic EOQ ModelBasic EOQ ModelBasic EOQ ModelBasic EOQ ModelImportant assumptions1. Demand is known, constant, and
i d d
Important assumptions
independent2. Lead time is known and constant3. Receipt of inventory is instantaneous and
completecomplete4. Quantity discounts are not possible5. Only variable costs are setup and holding6. Stockouts can be completely avoided
12 - 32© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
p y
Inventory Usage Over TimeInventory Usage Over TimeInventory Usage Over TimeInventory Usage Over Time
Order Usage rate Average inventoryOrder
quantity = Q(maximum inventory
inventory on hand
Q2ry
leve
l
level) 2
nven
tor
Minimum inventory
In
Time0
12 - 33© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Figure 12.3
Minimizing CostsMinimizing CostsMinimizing CostsMinimizing CostsObjective is to minimize total costsj
Total cost of holding andholding and setup (order)
Minimum t t l t
cost Holding cost
total cost
Ann
ual c
Set p (or order)A
Order quantity
Setup (or order) cost
Optimal order
12 - 34© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Table 12.4(c)
q yquantity (Q*)
The EOQ ModelThe EOQ Model DThe EOQ ModelThe EOQ ModelQ = Number of pieces per order
Annual setup cost = SDQ
Q Number of pieces per orderQ* = Optimal number of pieces per order (EOQ)D = Annual demand in units for the inventory itemS = Setup or ordering cost for each orderS = Setup or ordering cost for each orderH = Holding or carrying cost per unit per year
Annual setup cost = (Number of orders placed per year) x (Setup or order cost per order)
Annual demandNumber of units in each order
Setup or order cost per order=
= (S)DQ
12 - 35© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
The EOQ ModelThe EOQ Model DThe EOQ ModelThe EOQ ModelQ = Number of pieces per order
Annual setup cost = SDQ
Annual holding cost = HQ2Q Number of pieces per order
Q* = Optimal number of pieces per order (EOQ)D = Annual demand in units for the inventory itemS = Setup or ordering cost for each order
2
S = Setup or ordering cost for each orderH = Holding or carrying cost per unit per year
Annual holding cost = (Average inventory level) x (Holding cost per unit per year)
Order quantity2= (Holding cost per unit per year)
= (H)Q2
12 - 36© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
The EOQ ModelThe EOQ Model DThe EOQ ModelThe EOQ ModelQ = Number of pieces per order
Annual setup cost = SDQ
Annual holding cost = HQ2Q Number of pieces per order
Q* = Optimal number of pieces per order (EOQ)D = Annual demand in units for the inventory itemS = Setup or ordering cost for each order
2
S = Setup or ordering cost for each orderH = Holding or carrying cost per unit per year
O ti l d tit i f d h l t tOptimal order quantity is found when annual setup cost equals annual holding cost
D QDQ S = HQ
2Solving for Q* 2DS = Q2Hg 2DS = Q2H
Q2 = 2DS/HQ* 2DS/H
12 - 37© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Q* = 2DS/H
An EOQ ExampleAn EOQ ExampleAn EOQ ExampleAn EOQ ExampleD t i ti l b f dl t dDetermine optimal number of needles to orderD = 1,000 unitsS = $10 per orderS = $10 per orderH = $.50 per unit per year
Q* = 2DSHH
Q* = 2(1,000)(10) = 40 000 = 200 unitsQ* = ( )( )0.50
= 40,000 = 200 units
12 - 38© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
An EOQ ExampleAn EOQ ExampleAn EOQ ExampleAn EOQ ExampleD t i ti l b f dl t dDetermine optimal number of needles to orderD = 1,000 units Q* = 200 unitsS = $10 per orderS = $10 per orderH = $.50 per unit per year
= N = =Expected number of
d
DemandOrder quantity
DQ*orders Order quantity Q
N = = 5 orders per year1,000200N 5 orders per year 200
12 - 39© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
An EOQ ExampleAn EOQ ExampleAn EOQ ExampleAn EOQ ExampleD t i ti l b f dl t dDetermine optimal number of needles to orderD = 1,000 units Q* = 200 unitsS = $10 per order N = 5 orders per yearS = $10 per order N = 5 orders per yearH = $.50 per unit per year
= T =Expected
time between
Number of working days per year
= T =time between orders N
T = = 50 days between orders250T = = 50 days between orders5
12 - 40© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
An EOQ ExampleAn EOQ ExampleAn EOQ ExampleAn EOQ ExampleD t i ti l b f dl t dDetermine optimal number of needles to orderD = 1,000 units Q* = 200 unitsS = $10 per order N = 5 orders per yearS = $10 per order N = 5 orders per yearH = $.50 per unit per year T = 50 days
Total annual cost = Setup cost + Holding cost
TC = S + HD QTC = S + HQ 2
TC = ($10) + ($ 50)1,000 200TC ($10) + ($.50)200 2
TC = (5)($10) + (100)($.50) = $50 + $50 = $100
12 - 41© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
TC (5)($10) (100)($.50) $50 $50 $100
Robust ModelRobust Model
The EOQ model is robust Q It works even if all parameters
and assumptions are not metand assumptions are not met The total cost curve is relatively y
flat in the area of the EOQ
12 - 42© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
An EOQ ExampleAn EOQ ExampleAn EOQ ExampleAn EOQ Example
Management underestimated demand by 50%D = 1,000 units Q* = 200 units
$1,500 units
S = $10 per order N = 5 orders per yearH = $.50 per unit per year T = 50 days
TC = S + HDQ
Q2Q
TC = ($10) + ($.50) = $75 + $50 = $1251,500200
2002
Total annual cost increases by only 25%
12 - 43© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
An EOQ ExampleAn EOQ ExampleAn EOQ ExampleAn EOQ Example
Actual EOQ for new demand is 244.9 unitsD = 1,000 units Q* = 244.9 units
$1,500 units
S = $10 per order N = 5 orders per yearH = $.50 per unit per year T = 50 days
TC = S + HDQ
Q2 Only 2% lessQ
TC = ($10) + ($.50)1,500244.9
244.92
Only 2% less than the total cost of $125
TC = $61.24 + $61.24 = $122.48when the
order quantity was 200
12 - 44© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
was 200
R d P i tR d P i tReorder PointsReorder Points
EOQ answers the “how much” question The reorder point (ROP) tells “when” to The reorder point (ROP) tells when” to
order
ROP = Lead time for a new order in days
Demand per day
= d x L
d = DNumber of working days in a year
12 - 45© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
R d P i t CR d P i t CReorder Point CurveReorder Point CurveQ*
nits
)
Resupply takes place as order arrives
leve
l (u
Slope = units/day = d
ROP nven
tory
(units)In
Time (days)
12 - 46© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
( y )Figure 12.5 Lead time = L
R d P i t E lR d P i t E lReorder Point ExampleReorder Point ExampleDemand = 8,000 iPods per year250 working day yearLead time for orders is 3 working days
dD
d = Number of working days in a year
8 000/250 32 it
ROP = d x L
= 8,000/250 = 32 units
ROP d x L
= 32 units per day x 3 days = 96 units
12 - 47© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Production Order QuantityProduction Order QuantityProduction Order Quantity Production Order Quantity ModelModel
Used when inventory builds up Used when inventory builds up over a period of time after an order is placedorder is placed
Used when units are produced d ld i lt land sold simultaneously
12 - 48© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Production Order QuantityProduction Order QuantityProduction Order Quantity Production Order Quantity ModelModel
Part of inventory cycle during
leve
l
Part of inventory cycle during which production (and usage) is taking place
vent
ory
l Demand part of cycle with no production
Maximum inventory
Inv
Timet
12 - 49© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Figure 12.6
Production Order QuantityProduction Order QuantityProduction Order Quantity Production Order Quantity ModelModel
Q = Number of pieces per order p = Daily production rateH = Holding cost per unit per year d = Daily demand/usage ratet = Length of the production run in days
= (Average inventory level) xAnnual inventory holding cost
Holding cost per unit per year (Average inventory level) xholding cost per unit per year
= (Maximum inventory level)/2Annual inventory l l (Maximum inventory level)/2level
= –Maximum i t l l
Total produced during th d ti
Total used during th d ti inventory level the production run the production run
= pt – dt
12 - 50© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Production Order QuantityProduction Order QuantityProduction Order Quantity Production Order Quantity ModelModel
Q = Number of pieces per order p = Daily production rateH = Holding cost per unit per year d = Daily demand/usage ratet = Length of the production run in days
= –Maximum i t l l
Total produced during th d ti
Total used during th d ti inventory level the production run the production run
= pt – dt
However Q = total produced = pt ; thus t = Q/pHowever, Q = total produced = pt ; thus t = Q/p
Maximum inventory level = p – d = Q 1 –Q
pQp
dpinventory level pp p
Holding cost = (H) = 1 – HdQMaximum inventory level
12 - 51© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Holding cost = (H) = 1 – Hp22
Production Order QuantityProduction Order QuantityProduction Order Quantity Production Order Quantity ModelModel
Q = Number of pieces per order p = Daily production rateH = Holding cost per unit per year d = Daily demand/usage rateD = Annual demand
Setup cost = (D/Q)SHolding cost = HQ[1 - (d/p)]1
2
(D/Q)S HQ[1 (d/ )]1
Q2 = 2DS
(D/Q)S = HQ[1 - (d/p)]12
Q = H[1 - (d/p)]
Q* 2DS
12 - 52© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Q* = 2DSH[1 - (d/p)]p
Production Order QuantityProduction Order QuantityProduction Order Quantity Production Order Quantity ExampleExamplepp
D = 1,000 units p = 8 units per dayS = $10 d = 4 units per dayS = $10 d = 4 units per dayH = $0.50 per unit per year
Q* = 2DSH[1 - (d/p)]
Q* = = 80 0002(1,000)(10)
= 282 8 or 283 hubcaps
Q = = 80,0000.50[1 - (4/8)]
12 - 53© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
= 282.8 or 283 hubcaps
Production Order QuantityProduction Order QuantityProduction Order Quantity Production Order Quantity ModelModel
Note:
d = 4 = =D
Number of days the plant is in operation1,000250
When annual data are used the equation becomes
Q* = 2DSQ =annual demand rate
annual production rateH 1 –
12 - 54© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Quantity Discount ModelsQuantity Discount Models
Reduced prices are often available when larger quantities are purchasedlarger quantities are purchased
Trade-off is between reduced product cost and increased holding costand increased holding cost
Total cost = Setup cost + Holding cost + Product costTotal cost = Setup cost + Holding cost + Product cost
TC S H PDD QTC = S + H + PDDQ
Q2
12 - 55© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Quantity Discount ModelsQuantity Discount Models
A typical quantity discount schedule
Discount Number Discount Quantity Discount (%)
Discount Price (P)Number Discount Quantity Discount (%) Price (P)
1 0 to 999 no discount $5.00
2 1 000 to 1 999 4 $4 802 1,000 to 1,999 4 $4.80
3 2,000 and over 5 $4.75
Table 12.2
12 - 56© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Quantity Discount ModelsQuantity Discount Models
1 F h di t l l t Q*
Steps in analyzing a quantity discountSteps in analyzing a quantity discount
1. For each discount, calculate Q*2. If Q* for a discount doesn’t qualify, y
choose the smallest possible order size to get the discount
3. Compute the total cost for each Q* or adjusted value from Step 2
4. Select the Q* that gives the lowest total cost
12 - 57© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
cost
Quantity Discount ModelsQuantity Discount Models
Total cost curve for
Total cost curve for discount 2
t $
curve for discount 1
otal
cos
t
bTotal cost curve for discount 3
To
Q* for discount 2 is below the allowable range at point aand must be adjusted upward to 1,000 units at point b
ab
1 000 2 0000
1st price break
2nd price break
12 - 58© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
1,000 2,0000Order quantity Figure 12.7
Quantity Discount ExampleQuantity Discount ExampleCalculate Q* for every discount Q* = 2DS
IP
Q1* = = 700 cars/order2(5,000)(49)( 2)(5 00)1 (.2)(5.00)
2(5 000)(49)Q2* = = 714 cars/order2(5,000)(49)(.2)(4.80)
Q3* = = 718 cars/order2(5,000)(49)( 2)(4 75)
12 - 59© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
(.2)(4.75)
Quantity Discount ExampleQuantity Discount ExampleCalculate Q* for every discount Q* = 2DS
IP
Q1* = = 700 cars/order2(5,000)(49)( 2)(5 00)1 (.2)(5.00)
2(5 000)(49)Q2* = = 714 cars/order2(5,000)(49)(.2)(4.80) 1,000 — adjusted
Q3* = = 718 cars/order2(5,000)(49)( 2)(4 75)
12 - 60© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
(.2)(4.75) 2,000 — adjusted
Quantity Discount ExampleQuantity Discount Example
Discount Unit OrderAnnual Product
Annual Ordering
Annual HoldingDiscount
NumberUnit Price
Order Quantity
Product Cost
Ordering Cost
Holding Cost Total
1 $5.00 700 $25,000 $350 $350 $25,700
2 $4.80 1,000 $24,000 $245 $480 $24,725
3 $4.75 2,000 $23.750 $122.50 $950 $24,822.50, ,
Table 12.3
Choose the price and quantity that givesChoose the price and quantity that gives the lowest total cost
Buy 1,000 units at $4.80 per unit
12 - 61© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Buy 1,000 units at $4.80 per unit
Probabilistic Models andProbabilistic Models andProbabilistic Models and Probabilistic Models and Safety StockSafety Stockyy
Used when demand is not constant t ior certain
Use safety stock to achieve a desired service level and avoid stockouts
ROP d LROP = d x L + ss
A l k h f h i hAnnual stockout costs = the sum of the units short x the probability x the stockout cost/unit
x the number of orders per year
12 - 62© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
x the number of orders per year
S f t St k E lS f t St k E lSafety Stock ExampleSafety Stock ExampleROP = 50 units Stockout cost = $40 per frameOrders per year = 6 Carrying cost = $5 per frame per year
Number of Units Probability30 .240 .2
ROP 50 .360 .270 .1
1 0
12 - 63© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
1.0
S f t St k E lS f t St k E lSafety Stock ExampleSafety Stock ExampleROP = 50 units Stockout cost = $40 per frameOrders per year = 6 Carrying cost = $5 per frame per year
Safety Stock
Additional Holding Cost Stockout Cost
Total Cost
20 (20)($5) = $100 $0 $100
10 (10)($5) = $ 50 (10)(.1)($40)(6) = $240 $290
0 $ 0 (10)(.2)($40)(6) + (20)(.1)($40)(6) = $960 $960
A safety stock of 20 frames gives the lowest total costROP = 50 + 20 = 70 frames
12 - 64© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
ROP = 50 + 20 = 70 frames
P b bili ti D dP b bili ti D dProbabilistic DemandProbabilistic Demandy
leve
l Minimum demand during lead time
Maximum demand during lead time
ROP nven
tory Mean demand during lead time
Normal distribution probability of
ROP = 350 + safety stock of 16.5 = 366.5
In Normal distribution probability of demand during lead time
Expected demand during lead time (350 kits)
Safety stock 16.5 units
Time0 Lead time
12 - 65© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Place order
Receive order
Figure 12.8
P b bili ti D dP b bili ti D dProbabilistic DemandProbabilistic Demand
Use prescribed service levels to set safety stock when the cost of stockouts cannot bestock when the cost of stockouts cannot be determined
ROP = demand during lead time + ZdLT
where Z = number of standard deviationst d d d i ti f d ddLT = standard deviation of demand
during lead time
12 - 66© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
P b bili ti D dP b bili ti D dProbabilistic DemandProbabilistic Demand
Probability ofno stockout
95% of the time
Risk of a stockout (5% of area of normal curve)95% of the time )
Mean demand
350
ROP = ? kits Quantity
Safety stock
Number of0 z
12 - 67© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Number of standard deviations
P b bili ti E lP b bili ti E lProbabilistic ExampleProbabilistic ExampleAverage demand = = 350 kitsStandard deviation of demand during lead time = dLT = 10 kits5% stockout policy (service level = 95%)5% stockout policy (service level = 95%)
Using Appendix I, for an area under the curve of 95%, the Z = 1.65
Safety stock = ZdLT = 1.65(10) = 16.5 kitsSafety stock ZdLT 1.65(10) 16.5 kits
Reorder point = expected demand during lead time + safety stock+ safety stock
= 350 kits + 16.5 kits of safety stock= 366 5 or 367 kits
12 - 68© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
= 366.5 or 367 kits
Oth P b bili ti M d lOth P b bili ti M d lOther Probabilistic ModelsOther Probabilistic ModelsWhen data on demand during lead time is not available, there are other models
il bl
1 When demand is variable and lead
available
1. When demand is variable and lead time is constant
2 Wh l d ti i i bl d2. When lead time is variable and demand is constant
3. When both demand and lead time are variable
12 - 69© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Oth P b bili ti M d lOth P b bili ti M d lOther Probabilistic ModelsOther Probabilistic ModelsDemand is variable and lead time is constant
ROP = (average daily demand x lead time in days) + ZdLTx lead time in days) + ZdLT
where d = standard deviation of demand per daywhere d standard deviation of demand per daydLT = d lead time
12 - 70© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
P b bili ti E lP b bili ti E lProbabilistic ExampleProbabilistic ExampleAverage daily demand (normally distributed) = 15Standard deviation = 5Lead time is constant at 2 days90% service level desired
Z for 90% = 1.28From Appendix I
ROP = (15 units x 2 days) + ZdLT
30 1 28(5)( 2)= 30 + 1.28(5)( 2)= 30 + 9.02 = 39.02 ≈ 39
Safety stock is about 9 iPods
12 - 71© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Oth P b bili ti M d lOth P b bili ti M d lOther Probabilistic ModelsOther Probabilistic ModelsLead time is variable and demand is constant
ROP = (daily demand x average lead time in days)time in days)
= Z x (daily demand) x LT
where LT = standard deviation of lead time in days
12 - 72© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
P b bili ti E lP b bili ti E lProbabilistic ExampleProbabilistic Example
Daily demand (constant) = 10Average lead time = 6 days
Z for 98% = 2.055From Appendix I
Average lead time 6 daysStandard deviation of lead time = LT = 398% service level desired
ROP = (10 units x 6 days) + 2.055(10 units)(3)= 60 + 61.65 = 121.65
Reorder point is about 122 cameras
12 - 73© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Oth P b bili ti M d lOth P b bili ti M d lOther Probabilistic ModelsOther Probabilistic ModelsBoth demand and lead time are variable
ROP = (average daily demand x average lead time) + ZdLTx average lead time) + ZdLT
where d = standard deviation of demand per daywhere d standard deviation of demand per dayLT = standard deviation of lead time in daysdLT = (average lead time x d
2)dLT (average lead time x d ) + (average daily demand)2 x LT
2
12 - 74© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
P b bili ti E lP b bili ti E lProbabilistic ExampleProbabilistic ExampleAverage daily demand (normally distributed) = 150Standard deviation = d = 16A l d ti 5 d ( ll di t ib t d)Average lead time 5 days (normally distributed)Standard deviation = LT = 1 day95% service level desired Z for 95% = 1 65Z for 95% = 1.65
From Appendix I
ROP = (150 packs x 5 days) + 1.65dLT
= (150 x 5) + 1.65 (5 days x 162) + (1502 x 12)= 750 + 1.65(154) = 1,004 packs
12 - 75© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Si l P i d M d lSi l P i d M d lSingle Period ModelSingle Period Model Only one order is placed for a product Units have little or no value at the end of Units have little or no value at the end of
the sales period
Cs = Cost of shortage = Sales price/unit – Cost/unitC = Cost of overage = Cost/unit Salvage valueCo = Cost of overage = Cost/unit – Salvage value
CsService level =Cs
Cs + Co
12 - 76© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Si l P i d E lSi l P i d E lSingle Period ExampleSingle Period ExampleA d d 120 /dAverage demand = = 120 papers/dayStandard deviation = = 15 papersC = cost of shortage = $1 25 - $ 70 = $ 55Cs = cost of shortage = $1.25 - $.70 = $.55Co = cost of overage = $.70 - $.30 = $.40
Service level = Cs
Cs + Co
.55.55 + .40
= Service
level 57.8%
.55
.95= = .578
Optimal stocking level = 120
12 - 77© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Optimal stocking level
Si l P i d E lSi l P i d E lSingle Period ExampleSingle Period Example
From Appendix I, for the area .578, Z .20The optimal stocking level
= 120 copies + (.20)() 120 copies + (.20)()
= 120 + (.20)(15) = 120 + 3 = 123 papers
The stockout risk = 1 – service level
= 1 – .578 = .422 = 42.2%
12 - 78© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Fi dFi d P i d (P) S tP i d (P) S tFixedFixed--Period (P) SystemsPeriod (P) Systems
Orders placed at the end of a fixed period Inventory counted only at end of period Order brings inventory up to target levelg y p g
Only relevant costs are ordering and holdingy g g Lead times are known and constant Items are independent from one another Items are independent from one another
12 - 79© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Fi dFi d P i d (P) S tP i d (P) S tFixedFixed--Period (P) SystemsPeriod (P) SystemsTarget quantity (T)
ntor
y Q2Q4
nd in
ven
Q1 Q3
P
On-
han
P
P
12 - 80© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Time Figure 12.9
Fi dFi d P i d (P) E lP i d (P) E lFixedFixed--Period (P) ExamplePeriod (P) Example
3 jackets are back ordered No jackets are in stockIt is time to place an order Target value = 50
Order amount (Q) = Target (T) On
t s t e to p ace a o de a get a ue 50
Order amount (Q) = Target (T) - On-hand inventory - Earlier orders not yet
received + Back ordersreceived + Back orders
Q = 50 - 0 - 0 + 3 = 53 jacketsj
12 - 81© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Fi dFi d P i d S tP i d S tFixedFixed--Period SystemsPeriod Systems
Inventory is only counted at each review period
May be scheduled at convenient times y Appropriate in routine situations M lt i t k t b t May result in stockouts between
periods May require increased safety stock
12 - 82© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying,
recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Printed in the United States of America.
12 - 83© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall