output rtui
DESCRIPTION
gdhjfjhTRANSCRIPT
Frequencies
Frequency Table
Umur
17 43.6 43.6 43.622 56.4 56.4 100.039 100.0 100.0
1011Total
ValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent
CumulativePercent
Jenis kelamin
19 48.7 48.7 48.720 51.3 51.3 100.039 100.0 100.0
Laki-lakiPerempuanTotal
ValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent
CumulativePercent
Anak ke
25 64.1 64.1 64.111 28.2 28.2 92.32 5.1 5.1 97.41 2.6 2.6 100.0
39 100.0 100.0
1234Total
ValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent
CumulativePercent
Pendidikan ayah
3 7.7 7.7 7.716 41.0 41.0 48.72 5.1 5.1 53.8
10 25.6 25.6 79.55 12.8 12.8 92.33 7.7 7.7 100.0
39 100.0 100.0
SMPSMAD3S1S2S3Total
ValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent
CumulativePercent
Pendidikan ibu
2 5.1 5.1 5.17 17.9 17.9 23.1
13 33.3 33.3 56.42 5.1 5.1 61.5
13 33.3 33.3 94.91 2.6 2.6 97.41 2.6 2.6 100.0
39 100.0 100.0
SDSMPSMAD3S1S2S3Total
ValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent
CumulativePercent
Pekerjaan ayah
23 59.0 59.0 59.07 17.9 17.9 76.99 23.1 23.1 100.0
39 100.0 100.0
SwastaWiraswastaPNSTotal
ValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent
CumulativePercent
Pekerjaan ibu
12 30.8 30.8 30.812 30.8 30.8 61.56 15.4 15.4 76.99 23.1 23.1 100.0
39 100.0 100.0
IRTSwastaWiraswastaPNSTotal
ValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent
CumulativePercent
Absensi
10 25.6 25.6 25.68 20.5 20.5 46.27 17.9 17.9 64.14 10.3 10.3 74.41 2.6 2.6 76.94 10.3 10.3 87.21 2.6 2.6 89.71 2.6 2.6 92.31 2.6 2.6 94.91 2.6 2.6 97.41 2.6 2.6 100.0
39 100.0 100.0
0123456891011Total
ValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent
CumulativePercent
Nilai raport
23 59.0 59.0 59.016 41.0 41.0 100.039 100.0 100.0
BaikKurangTotal
ValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent
CumulativePercent
Total difficulties score
29 74.4 74.4 74.42 5.1 5.1 79.58 20.5 20.5 100.0
39 100.0 100.0
NormalBorderlineAbnormalTotal
ValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent
CumulativePercent
Emotional
36 92.3 92.3 92.33 7.7 7.7 100.0
39 100.0 100.0
NormalBorderlineTotal
ValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent
CumulativePercent
Conduct problems
34 87.2 87.2 87.23 7.7 7.7 94.92 5.1 5.1 100.0
39 100.0 100.0
NormalBorderlineAbnormalTotal
ValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent
CumulativePercent
Hyperactivity
32 82.1 82.1 82.15 12.8 12.8 94.92 5.1 5.1 100.0
39 100.0 100.0
NormalBorderlineAbnormalTotal
ValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent
CumulativePercent
Peer problems
31 79.5 79.5 79.57 17.9 17.9 97.41 2.6 2.6 100.0
39 100.0 100.0
NormalBorderlineAbnormalTotal
ValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent
CumulativePercent
Prosocial behavior score
31 79.5 79.5 79.51 2.6 2.6 82.17 17.9 17.9 100.0
39 100.0 100.0
NormalBorderlineAbnormalTotal
ValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent
CumulativePercent
Crosstabs
Total difficulties score * Nilai raport
Crosstab
19 10 2917.1 11.9 29.0
48.7% 25.6% 74.4%1 1 2
1.2 .8 2.02.6% 2.6% 5.1%
3 5 84.7 3.3 8.0
7.7% 12.8% 20.5%23 16 39
23.0 16.0 39.059.0% 41.0% 100.0%
CountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of Total
Normal
Borderline
Abnormal
Total difficultiesscore
Total
Baik KurangNilai raport
Total
Chi-Square Tests
2.104a 2 .3492.082 2 .353
2.049 1 .152
39
Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases
Value dfAsymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
4 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. Theminimum expected count is .82.
a.
Emotional * Nilai raport
Crosstab
21 15 3621.2 14.8 36.0
53.8% 38.5% 92.3%2 1 3
1.8 1.2 3.05.1% 2.6% 7.7%
23 16 3923.0 16.0 39.0
59.0% 41.0% 100.0%
CountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of Total
Normal
Borderline
Emotional
Total
Baik KurangNilai raport
Total
Chi-Square Tests
.079b 1 .778
.000 1 1.000
.081 1 .7761.000 .637
.077 1 .781
39
Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona
Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases
Value dfAsymp. Sig.
(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)
Exact Sig.(1-sided)
Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.
2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.23.
b.
Conduct problems * Nilai raport
Crosstab
22 12 3420.1 13.9 34.0
56.4% 30.8% 87.2%1 2 3
1.8 1.2 3.02.6% 5.1% 7.7%
0 2 21.2 .8 2.0
.0% 5.1% 5.1%23 16 39
23.0 16.0 39.059.0% 41.0% 100.0%
CountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of Total
Normal
Borderline
Abnormal
Conductproblems
Total
Baik KurangNilai raport
Total
Chi-Square Tests
4.152a 2 .1254.834 2 .089
4.045 1 .044
39
Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases
Value dfAsymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
4 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. Theminimum expected count is .82.
a.
Hyperactivity * Nilai raport
Crosstab
22 10 3218.9 13.1 32.0
56.4% 25.6% 82.1%1 4 5
2.9 2.1 5.02.6% 10.3% 12.8%
0 2 21.2 .8 2.0
.0% 5.1% 5.1%23 16 39
23.0 16.0 39.059.0% 41.0% 100.0%
CountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of Total
Normal
Borderline
Abnormal
Hyperactivity
Total
Baik KurangNilai raport
Total
Chi-Square Tests
7.278a 2 .0268.049 2 .018
6.841 1 .009
39
Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases
Value dfAsymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
4 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. Theminimum expected count is .82.
a.
Peer problems * Nilai raport
Crosstab
21 10 3118.3 12.7 31.0
53.8% 25.6% 79.5%1 6 7
4.1 2.9 7.02.6% 15.4% 17.9%
1 0 1.6 .4 1.0
2.6% .0% 2.6%23 16 39
23.0 16.0 39.059.0% 41.0% 100.0%
CountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of Total
Normal
Borderline
Abnormal
Peerproblems
Total
Baik KurangNilai raport
Total
Chi-Square Tests
7.459a 2 .0248.075 2 .018
2.403 1 .121
39
Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases
Value dfAsymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
4 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. Theminimum expected count is .41.
a.
Prosocial behavior score * Nilai raport
Crosstab
21 10 3118.3 12.7 31.0
53.8% 25.6% 79.5%1 0 1
.6 .4 1.02.6% .0% 2.6%
1 6 74.1 2.9 7.0
2.6% 15.4% 17.9%23 16 39
23.0 16.0 39.059.0% 41.0% 100.0%
CountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of Total
Normal
Borderline
Abnormal
Prosocialbehaviorscore
Total
Baik KurangNilai raport
Total
Chi-Square Tests
7.459a 2 .0248.075 2 .018
5.925 1 .015
39
Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases
Value dfAsymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
4 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. Theminimum expected count is .41.
a.
Crosstabs
Total difficulties score (gabungan) * Nilai raport
Crosstab
19 10 2917.1 11.9 29.0
48.7% 25.6% 74.4%4 6 10
5.9 4.1 10.010.3% 15.4% 25.6%
23 16 3923.0 16.0 39.0
59.0% 41.0% 100.0%
CountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of Total
Normal
Borderline/Abnormal
Total difficulties score(gabungan)
Total
Baik KurangNilai raport
Total
Chi-Square Tests
2.001b 1 .1571.085 1 .2971.979 1 .159
.264 .149
1.950 1 .163
39
Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona
Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases
Value dfAsymp. Sig.
(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)
Exact Sig.(1-sided)
Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.
1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.10.
b.
Symmetric Measures
.221 .15739
Contingency CoefficientNominal by NominalN of Valid Cases
Value Approx. Sig.
Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.
Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.
Risk Estimate
2.850 .650 12.505
1.638 .733 3.659
.575 .282 1.172
39
Odds Ratio for Totaldifficulties score(gabungan) (Normal /Borderline/Abnormal)For cohort Nilai raport= BaikFor cohort Nilai raport= KurangN of Valid Cases
Value Lower Upper
95% ConfidenceInterval
Conduct problems (gabungan) * Nilai raport
Crosstab
22 12 3420.1 13.9 34.0
56.4% 30.8% 87.2%1 4 5
2.9 2.1 5.02.6% 10.3% 12.8%
23 16 3923.0 16.0 39.0
59.0% 41.0% 100.0%
CountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of Total
Normal
Borderline/Abnormal
Conduct problems(gabungan)
Total
Baik KurangNilai raport
Total
Chi-Square Tests
3.601b 1 .0581.990 1 .1583.649 1 .056
.139 .080
3.508 1 .061
39
Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona
Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases
Value dfAsymp. Sig.
(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)
Exact Sig.(1-sided)
Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.
2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.05.
b.
Symmetric Measures
.291 .05839
Contingency CoefficientNominal by NominalN of Valid Cases
Value Approx. Sig.
Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.
Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.
Risk Estimate
7.333 .734 73.248
3.235 .551 19.004
.441 .235 .830
39
Odds Ratio forConduct problems(gabungan) (Normal /Borderline/Abnormal)For cohort Nilai raport= BaikFor cohort Nilai raport= KurangN of Valid Cases
Value Lower Upper
95% ConfidenceInterval
Hyperactivity (gabungan) * Nilai raport
Crosstab
22 10 3218.9 13.1 32.0
56.4% 25.6% 82.1%1 6 7
4.1 2.9 7.02.6% 15.4% 17.9%
23 16 3923.0 16.0 39.0
59.0% 41.0% 100.0%
CountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of Total
Normal
Borderline/Abnormal
Hyperactivity(gabungan)
Total
Baik KurangNilai raport
Total
Chi-Square Tests
7.042b 1 .0084.971 1 .0267.311 1 .007
.013 .013
6.861 1 .009
39
Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona
Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases
Value dfAsymp. Sig.
(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)
Exact Sig.(1-sided)
Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.
2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.87.
b.
Symmetric Measures
.391 .00839
Contingency CoefficientNominal by NominalN of Valid Cases
Value Approx. Sig.
Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.
Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.
Risk Estimate
13.200 1.398 124.626
4.813 .772 29.987
.365 .201 .662
39
Odds Ratio forHyperactivity(gabungan) (Normal /Borderline/Abnormal)For cohort Nilai raport= BaikFor cohort Nilai raport= KurangN of Valid Cases
Value Lower Upper
95% ConfidenceInterval
Peer problems (gabungan) * Nilai raport
Crosstab
21 10 3118.3 12.7 31.0
53.8% 25.6% 79.5%2 6 8
4.7 3.3 8.05.1% 15.4% 20.5%
23 16 3923.0 16.0 39.0
59.0% 41.0% 100.0%
CountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of Total
Normal
Borderline/Abnormal
Peer problems(gabungan)
Total
Baik KurangNilai raport
Total
Chi-Square Tests
4.801b 1 .0283.197 1 .0744.819 1 .028
.045 .037
4.678 1 .031
39
Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona
Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases
Value dfAsymp. Sig.
(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)
Exact Sig.(1-sided)
Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.
2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.28.
b.
Symmetric Measures
.331 .02839
Contingency CoefficientNominal by NominalN of Valid Cases
Value Approx. Sig.
Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.
Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.
Risk Estimate
6.300 1.075 36.936
2.710 .796 9.220
.430 .225 .822
39
Odds Ratio for Peerproblems(gabungan) (Normal /Borderline/Abnormal)For cohort Nilai raport= BaikFor cohort Nilai raport= KurangN of Valid Cases
Value Lower Upper
95% ConfidenceInterval
Prosocial behavior score (gabungan) * Nilai raport
Crosstab
21 10 3118.3 12.7 31.0
53.8% 25.6% 79.5%2 6 8
4.7 3.3 8.05.1% 15.4% 20.5%
23 16 3923.0 16.0 39.0
59.0% 41.0% 100.0%
CountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of Total
Normal
Borderline/Abnormal
Prosocial behaviorscore (gabungan)
Total
Baik KurangNilai raport
Total
Chi-Square Tests
4.801b 1 .0283.197 1 .0744.819 1 .028
.045 .037
4.678 1 .031
39
Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona
Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases
Value dfAsymp. Sig.
(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)
Exact Sig.(1-sided)
Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.
2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.28.
b.
Symmetric Measures
.331 .02839
Contingency CoefficientNominal by NominalN of Valid Cases
Value Approx. Sig.
Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.
Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.
Risk Estimate
6.300 1.075 36.936
2.710 .796 9.220
.430 .225 .822
39
Odds Ratio for Prosocialbehavior score(gabungan) (Normal /Borderline/Abnormal)For cohort Nilai raport =BaikFor cohort Nilai raport =KurangN of Valid Cases
Value Lower Upper
95% ConfidenceInterval
Crosstabs
Jenis kelamin * Nilai raport Crosstabulation
7 12 1911.2 7.8 19.0
17.9% 30.8% 48.7%16 4 20
11.8 8.2 20.041.0% 10.3% 51.3%
23 16 3923.0 16.0 39.0
59.0% 41.0% 100.0%
CountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of Total
Laki-laki
Perempuan
Jenis kelamin
Total
Baik KurangNilai raport
Total
Chi-Square Tests
7.501b 1 .0065.823 1 .0167.778 1 .005
.010 .007
7.309 1 .007
39
Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona
Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases
Value dfAsymp. Sig.
(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)
Exact Sig.(1-sided)
Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.
0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7.79.
b.
Symmetric Measures
.402 .00639
Contingency CoefficientNominal by NominalN of Valid Cases
Value Approx. Sig.
Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.
Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.
Risk Estimate
.146 .035 .615
.461 .246 .863
3.158 1.232 8.095
39
Odds Ratio for Jeniskelamin (Laki-laki /Perempuan)For cohort Nilairaport = BaikFor cohort Nilairaport = KurangN of Valid Cases
Value Lower Upper
95% ConfidenceInterval
Crosstabs
Total difficulties score * Jenis kelamin Crosstabulation
16 13 2914.1 14.9 29.0
41.0% 33.3% 74.4%0 2 2
1.0 1.0 2.0.0% 5.1% 5.1%
3 5 83.9 4.1 8.0
7.7% 12.8% 20.5%19 20 39
19.0 20.0 39.048.7% 51.3% 100.0%
CountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of Total
Normal
Borderline
Abnormal
Total difficultiesscore
Total
Laki-laki PerempuanJenis kelamin
Total
Chi-Square Tests
2.787a 2 .2483.563 2 .168
1.164 1 .281
39
Pearson Chi-SquareLikelihood RatioLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases
Value dfAsymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
4 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. Theminimum expected count is .97.
a.
Symmetric Measures
.258 .24839
Contingency CoefficientNominal by NominalN of Valid Cases
Value Approx. Sig.
Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.
Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.
Crosstabs
Total difficulties score (gabungan) * Jenis kelamin Crosstabulation
16 13 2914.1 14.9 29.0
41.0% 33.3% 74.4%3 7 10
4.9 5.1 10.07.7% 17.9% 25.6%
19 20 3919.0 20.0 39.0
48.7% 51.3% 100.0%
CountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of TotalCountExpected Count% of Total
Normal
Borderline/Abnormal
Total difficulties score(gabungan)
Total
Laki-laki PerempuanJenis kelamin
Total
Chi-Square Tests
1.886b 1 .1701.013 1 .3141.931 1 .165
.273 .157
1.838 1 .175
39
Pearson Chi-SquareContinuity Correctiona
Likelihood RatioFisher's Exact TestLinear-by-LinearAssociationN of Valid Cases
Value dfAsymp. Sig.
(2-sided)Exact Sig.(2-sided)
Exact Sig.(1-sided)
Computed only for a 2x2 tablea.
1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.87.
b.
Symmetric Measures
.215 .17039
Contingency CoefficientNominal by NominalN of Valid Cases
Value Approx. Sig.
Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.
Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.
Risk Estimate
2.872 .617 13.366
1.839 .675 5.009
.640 .361 1.135
39
Odds Ratio for Totaldifficulties score(gabungan) (Normal /Borderline/Abnormal)For cohort Jeniskelamin = Laki-lakiFor cohort Jeniskelamin = PerempuanN of Valid Cases
Value Lower Upper
95% ConfidenceInterval