overview of hazard assessment for risk management program...oca guidance simple generalized...

19
Offsite Consequences Analysis Overview of hazard assessment for risk management program 1 OCA 5/7/2013

Upload: others

Post on 15-Jul-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Overview of hazard assessment for risk management program...OCA Guidance Simple generalized calculations ALOHA Models key hazards related to chemical releases that result in toxic

Offsite Consequences Analysis

Overview of hazard assessment for risk management program

1 OCA 572013

2

Definitions

Offsite areas beyond property boundary of stationary source and areas within property boundary to which public has routine and unrestricted access during or outside of business hours

Worst-case Release Scenario release of largest quantity of regulated substance from vessel or process line failure that results in greatest distance to endpoint

Alternative Release Scenario scenarios more likely to occur than worst-case scenario and that will reach endpoint offsite unless no such scenario exists

OCA 572013

Required OCA Scenarios

For each Program 1 process One worst-case scenario No alternative scenarios required

3 OCA 572013

Required OCA Scenarios

For all Program 2 and 3 processes One worst-case scenario for all toxics One worst-case scenario for all flammables Additional worst-case scenarios if different public

receptors could be affected (more common for flammables) Public receptors offsite areas such as residences schools

office buildings and parks where members of public could be exposed

At least one alternative scenario for each toxic At least one alternative scenario for all flammables

4 OCA 572013

5

Mitigation Systems

Activities or equipment designed to contain released substances to minimize exposure

Passive mitigation Function without human mechanical or other energy input

Examples building enclosures dikes blast walls

Active mitigation Need human mechanical or other energy input to function

Examples interlocks shutdown systems pressure relieving devices flares emergency isolation systems water cannons

OCA 572013

6

Scenario Selection Requirements

Worst-case Greatest amount held in single vessel or pipe taking

into account administrative controls that limit inventory and passive mitigation

Also must consider scenarios involving Smaller quantities at higher process temperature or pressure Proximity to stationary source boundary

Must be the scenario with greatest offsite distance to endpoint

OCA 572013

7

Scenario Selection Requirements

Alternative Must reach offsite endpoint unless no such scenario

exists Must be more likely than worst-case scenario Can consider active mitigation Should consider 5-year release history and failure

scenarios identified in PHA or hazard review

OCA 572013

One Process

Worst case

Process vs Worst Case

88 OCA 572013

Process vs Worst Case

One Process

Worst case

9 OCA 572013 9

10

Required OCA Endpoints

Toxic substances Must use those provided in Appendix A of rule

Flammable substances Explosions 1 psi overpressure (endpoint required for

worst-case scenario) Flash fires lower flammability limit (LFL) Pooljet fires and fireballs 5 kWm2 for 40 seconds

(or equivalent)

OCA 572013

Potential Sources

OCA Guidance RMPCompTM

NOAA amp EPA developed software program Performs calculations described in OCA Guidance Simple generalized calculations

ALOHA Models key hazards related to chemical releases that result

in toxic gas dispersions fires andor explosions Greater user control of inputs flexibility in scenario choice

and choice of scenario outputs Truncates endpoint distance

11 OCA 572013

12

Potential Sources

Publicly available or proprietary models May account for more factors May provide more accurate estimates May require greater user knowledge and experience

If using a source other than OCA Guidance or RMPCompTM make sure the model inputs follow the specified requirements (ie facility-specific meteorological conditions)

Be able to provide a copy of the model and documentation upon request

OCA 572013

Simplified Illustration of Fictional Worst-Case and Alternative Release Scenarios on a Local Map

Source has 2 regulated Toxic substances 1 regulated Flammable substance

Source Boundary

Flammable WCS

Toxic ARS 2

Toxic ARS 1 A Street

Toxic WCS distance to endpoint 0 12 1

Rail Spur Miles

13 OCA 572013

14

Offsite ImpactsReceptors

Residential populations (the public) Based on latest census data or other updated information

Other public receptors Institutions (schools hospitals prisons) Local parks and recreation areas Commercial office and industrial buildings

OCA 572013

15

Offsite ImpactsReceptors

Environmental receptors or natural areas such as national or state parks forests or monuments that can be identified on local USGS maps including Wildlife preserves Federal and state parks Wilderness areas

OCA 572013

Obtaining Receptor Data

Census Publications of the Bureau of the Census including County and City

Data Book Bureau of the Census website wwwcensusgov

LandView httpwwwcensusgovgeolandview

USGS maps Online ordering site httpstoreusgsgov Additional info httpaskusgsgov 1-800-USA-MAPS

16 OCA 572013

17

Review and Update

Reevaluate if the worst-case vessel conditions change If the distance to endpoint increasesdecreases by a factor of 2

or more update the RMP within 6 months

Review and update all OCA elements every 5 years Ensure process conditions have not changed Ensure public and environmental receptors have not changed Update population numbers based on most recent census

Make sure to document that the review occurred If no changes at minimum have a signed ldquomemo to filerdquo indicating

what information was reviewed

OCA 572013

18

Common Errors and ldquoRed Flagsrdquo

Wrong release quantity Inconsistencies between release quantity and endpoint distance

(eg very large release quantity with very short endpoint distance)

No documentation corresponding to information provided in RMP

No documentation that information is reviewed every five years

Worst Case Vessel Rationale for selection not documented Wrong vessel identified

OCA 572013

-

Questions

19 OCA 572013

  • Offsite Consequences Analysis
  • Definitions
  • Required OCA Scenarios
  • Required OCA Scenarios
  • Mitigation Systems
  • Scenario Selection Requirements
  • Scenario Selection Requirements
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Required OCA Endpoints
  • Potential Sources
  • Potential Sources
  • Simplified Illustration of Fictional Worst-Case and Alternative Release Scenarios on a Local Map
  • Offsite ImpactsReceptors
  • Offsite ImpactsReceptors
  • Obtaining Receptor Data
  • Review and Update
  • Common Errors and ldquoRed Flagsrdquo
  • Questions
Page 2: Overview of hazard assessment for risk management program...OCA Guidance Simple generalized calculations ALOHA Models key hazards related to chemical releases that result in toxic

2

Definitions

Offsite areas beyond property boundary of stationary source and areas within property boundary to which public has routine and unrestricted access during or outside of business hours

Worst-case Release Scenario release of largest quantity of regulated substance from vessel or process line failure that results in greatest distance to endpoint

Alternative Release Scenario scenarios more likely to occur than worst-case scenario and that will reach endpoint offsite unless no such scenario exists

OCA 572013

Required OCA Scenarios

For each Program 1 process One worst-case scenario No alternative scenarios required

3 OCA 572013

Required OCA Scenarios

For all Program 2 and 3 processes One worst-case scenario for all toxics One worst-case scenario for all flammables Additional worst-case scenarios if different public

receptors could be affected (more common for flammables) Public receptors offsite areas such as residences schools

office buildings and parks where members of public could be exposed

At least one alternative scenario for each toxic At least one alternative scenario for all flammables

4 OCA 572013

5

Mitigation Systems

Activities or equipment designed to contain released substances to minimize exposure

Passive mitigation Function without human mechanical or other energy input

Examples building enclosures dikes blast walls

Active mitigation Need human mechanical or other energy input to function

Examples interlocks shutdown systems pressure relieving devices flares emergency isolation systems water cannons

OCA 572013

6

Scenario Selection Requirements

Worst-case Greatest amount held in single vessel or pipe taking

into account administrative controls that limit inventory and passive mitigation

Also must consider scenarios involving Smaller quantities at higher process temperature or pressure Proximity to stationary source boundary

Must be the scenario with greatest offsite distance to endpoint

OCA 572013

7

Scenario Selection Requirements

Alternative Must reach offsite endpoint unless no such scenario

exists Must be more likely than worst-case scenario Can consider active mitigation Should consider 5-year release history and failure

scenarios identified in PHA or hazard review

OCA 572013

One Process

Worst case

Process vs Worst Case

88 OCA 572013

Process vs Worst Case

One Process

Worst case

9 OCA 572013 9

10

Required OCA Endpoints

Toxic substances Must use those provided in Appendix A of rule

Flammable substances Explosions 1 psi overpressure (endpoint required for

worst-case scenario) Flash fires lower flammability limit (LFL) Pooljet fires and fireballs 5 kWm2 for 40 seconds

(or equivalent)

OCA 572013

Potential Sources

OCA Guidance RMPCompTM

NOAA amp EPA developed software program Performs calculations described in OCA Guidance Simple generalized calculations

ALOHA Models key hazards related to chemical releases that result

in toxic gas dispersions fires andor explosions Greater user control of inputs flexibility in scenario choice

and choice of scenario outputs Truncates endpoint distance

11 OCA 572013

12

Potential Sources

Publicly available or proprietary models May account for more factors May provide more accurate estimates May require greater user knowledge and experience

If using a source other than OCA Guidance or RMPCompTM make sure the model inputs follow the specified requirements (ie facility-specific meteorological conditions)

Be able to provide a copy of the model and documentation upon request

OCA 572013

Simplified Illustration of Fictional Worst-Case and Alternative Release Scenarios on a Local Map

Source has 2 regulated Toxic substances 1 regulated Flammable substance

Source Boundary

Flammable WCS

Toxic ARS 2

Toxic ARS 1 A Street

Toxic WCS distance to endpoint 0 12 1

Rail Spur Miles

13 OCA 572013

14

Offsite ImpactsReceptors

Residential populations (the public) Based on latest census data or other updated information

Other public receptors Institutions (schools hospitals prisons) Local parks and recreation areas Commercial office and industrial buildings

OCA 572013

15

Offsite ImpactsReceptors

Environmental receptors or natural areas such as national or state parks forests or monuments that can be identified on local USGS maps including Wildlife preserves Federal and state parks Wilderness areas

OCA 572013

Obtaining Receptor Data

Census Publications of the Bureau of the Census including County and City

Data Book Bureau of the Census website wwwcensusgov

LandView httpwwwcensusgovgeolandview

USGS maps Online ordering site httpstoreusgsgov Additional info httpaskusgsgov 1-800-USA-MAPS

16 OCA 572013

17

Review and Update

Reevaluate if the worst-case vessel conditions change If the distance to endpoint increasesdecreases by a factor of 2

or more update the RMP within 6 months

Review and update all OCA elements every 5 years Ensure process conditions have not changed Ensure public and environmental receptors have not changed Update population numbers based on most recent census

Make sure to document that the review occurred If no changes at minimum have a signed ldquomemo to filerdquo indicating

what information was reviewed

OCA 572013

18

Common Errors and ldquoRed Flagsrdquo

Wrong release quantity Inconsistencies between release quantity and endpoint distance

(eg very large release quantity with very short endpoint distance)

No documentation corresponding to information provided in RMP

No documentation that information is reviewed every five years

Worst Case Vessel Rationale for selection not documented Wrong vessel identified

OCA 572013

-

Questions

19 OCA 572013

  • Offsite Consequences Analysis
  • Definitions
  • Required OCA Scenarios
  • Required OCA Scenarios
  • Mitigation Systems
  • Scenario Selection Requirements
  • Scenario Selection Requirements
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Required OCA Endpoints
  • Potential Sources
  • Potential Sources
  • Simplified Illustration of Fictional Worst-Case and Alternative Release Scenarios on a Local Map
  • Offsite ImpactsReceptors
  • Offsite ImpactsReceptors
  • Obtaining Receptor Data
  • Review and Update
  • Common Errors and ldquoRed Flagsrdquo
  • Questions
Page 3: Overview of hazard assessment for risk management program...OCA Guidance Simple generalized calculations ALOHA Models key hazards related to chemical releases that result in toxic

Required OCA Scenarios

For each Program 1 process One worst-case scenario No alternative scenarios required

3 OCA 572013

Required OCA Scenarios

For all Program 2 and 3 processes One worst-case scenario for all toxics One worst-case scenario for all flammables Additional worst-case scenarios if different public

receptors could be affected (more common for flammables) Public receptors offsite areas such as residences schools

office buildings and parks where members of public could be exposed

At least one alternative scenario for each toxic At least one alternative scenario for all flammables

4 OCA 572013

5

Mitigation Systems

Activities or equipment designed to contain released substances to minimize exposure

Passive mitigation Function without human mechanical or other energy input

Examples building enclosures dikes blast walls

Active mitigation Need human mechanical or other energy input to function

Examples interlocks shutdown systems pressure relieving devices flares emergency isolation systems water cannons

OCA 572013

6

Scenario Selection Requirements

Worst-case Greatest amount held in single vessel or pipe taking

into account administrative controls that limit inventory and passive mitigation

Also must consider scenarios involving Smaller quantities at higher process temperature or pressure Proximity to stationary source boundary

Must be the scenario with greatest offsite distance to endpoint

OCA 572013

7

Scenario Selection Requirements

Alternative Must reach offsite endpoint unless no such scenario

exists Must be more likely than worst-case scenario Can consider active mitigation Should consider 5-year release history and failure

scenarios identified in PHA or hazard review

OCA 572013

One Process

Worst case

Process vs Worst Case

88 OCA 572013

Process vs Worst Case

One Process

Worst case

9 OCA 572013 9

10

Required OCA Endpoints

Toxic substances Must use those provided in Appendix A of rule

Flammable substances Explosions 1 psi overpressure (endpoint required for

worst-case scenario) Flash fires lower flammability limit (LFL) Pooljet fires and fireballs 5 kWm2 for 40 seconds

(or equivalent)

OCA 572013

Potential Sources

OCA Guidance RMPCompTM

NOAA amp EPA developed software program Performs calculations described in OCA Guidance Simple generalized calculations

ALOHA Models key hazards related to chemical releases that result

in toxic gas dispersions fires andor explosions Greater user control of inputs flexibility in scenario choice

and choice of scenario outputs Truncates endpoint distance

11 OCA 572013

12

Potential Sources

Publicly available or proprietary models May account for more factors May provide more accurate estimates May require greater user knowledge and experience

If using a source other than OCA Guidance or RMPCompTM make sure the model inputs follow the specified requirements (ie facility-specific meteorological conditions)

Be able to provide a copy of the model and documentation upon request

OCA 572013

Simplified Illustration of Fictional Worst-Case and Alternative Release Scenarios on a Local Map

Source has 2 regulated Toxic substances 1 regulated Flammable substance

Source Boundary

Flammable WCS

Toxic ARS 2

Toxic ARS 1 A Street

Toxic WCS distance to endpoint 0 12 1

Rail Spur Miles

13 OCA 572013

14

Offsite ImpactsReceptors

Residential populations (the public) Based on latest census data or other updated information

Other public receptors Institutions (schools hospitals prisons) Local parks and recreation areas Commercial office and industrial buildings

OCA 572013

15

Offsite ImpactsReceptors

Environmental receptors or natural areas such as national or state parks forests or monuments that can be identified on local USGS maps including Wildlife preserves Federal and state parks Wilderness areas

OCA 572013

Obtaining Receptor Data

Census Publications of the Bureau of the Census including County and City

Data Book Bureau of the Census website wwwcensusgov

LandView httpwwwcensusgovgeolandview

USGS maps Online ordering site httpstoreusgsgov Additional info httpaskusgsgov 1-800-USA-MAPS

16 OCA 572013

17

Review and Update

Reevaluate if the worst-case vessel conditions change If the distance to endpoint increasesdecreases by a factor of 2

or more update the RMP within 6 months

Review and update all OCA elements every 5 years Ensure process conditions have not changed Ensure public and environmental receptors have not changed Update population numbers based on most recent census

Make sure to document that the review occurred If no changes at minimum have a signed ldquomemo to filerdquo indicating

what information was reviewed

OCA 572013

18

Common Errors and ldquoRed Flagsrdquo

Wrong release quantity Inconsistencies between release quantity and endpoint distance

(eg very large release quantity with very short endpoint distance)

No documentation corresponding to information provided in RMP

No documentation that information is reviewed every five years

Worst Case Vessel Rationale for selection not documented Wrong vessel identified

OCA 572013

-

Questions

19 OCA 572013

  • Offsite Consequences Analysis
  • Definitions
  • Required OCA Scenarios
  • Required OCA Scenarios
  • Mitigation Systems
  • Scenario Selection Requirements
  • Scenario Selection Requirements
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Required OCA Endpoints
  • Potential Sources
  • Potential Sources
  • Simplified Illustration of Fictional Worst-Case and Alternative Release Scenarios on a Local Map
  • Offsite ImpactsReceptors
  • Offsite ImpactsReceptors
  • Obtaining Receptor Data
  • Review and Update
  • Common Errors and ldquoRed Flagsrdquo
  • Questions
Page 4: Overview of hazard assessment for risk management program...OCA Guidance Simple generalized calculations ALOHA Models key hazards related to chemical releases that result in toxic

Required OCA Scenarios

For all Program 2 and 3 processes One worst-case scenario for all toxics One worst-case scenario for all flammables Additional worst-case scenarios if different public

receptors could be affected (more common for flammables) Public receptors offsite areas such as residences schools

office buildings and parks where members of public could be exposed

At least one alternative scenario for each toxic At least one alternative scenario for all flammables

4 OCA 572013

5

Mitigation Systems

Activities or equipment designed to contain released substances to minimize exposure

Passive mitigation Function without human mechanical or other energy input

Examples building enclosures dikes blast walls

Active mitigation Need human mechanical or other energy input to function

Examples interlocks shutdown systems pressure relieving devices flares emergency isolation systems water cannons

OCA 572013

6

Scenario Selection Requirements

Worst-case Greatest amount held in single vessel or pipe taking

into account administrative controls that limit inventory and passive mitigation

Also must consider scenarios involving Smaller quantities at higher process temperature or pressure Proximity to stationary source boundary

Must be the scenario with greatest offsite distance to endpoint

OCA 572013

7

Scenario Selection Requirements

Alternative Must reach offsite endpoint unless no such scenario

exists Must be more likely than worst-case scenario Can consider active mitigation Should consider 5-year release history and failure

scenarios identified in PHA or hazard review

OCA 572013

One Process

Worst case

Process vs Worst Case

88 OCA 572013

Process vs Worst Case

One Process

Worst case

9 OCA 572013 9

10

Required OCA Endpoints

Toxic substances Must use those provided in Appendix A of rule

Flammable substances Explosions 1 psi overpressure (endpoint required for

worst-case scenario) Flash fires lower flammability limit (LFL) Pooljet fires and fireballs 5 kWm2 for 40 seconds

(or equivalent)

OCA 572013

Potential Sources

OCA Guidance RMPCompTM

NOAA amp EPA developed software program Performs calculations described in OCA Guidance Simple generalized calculations

ALOHA Models key hazards related to chemical releases that result

in toxic gas dispersions fires andor explosions Greater user control of inputs flexibility in scenario choice

and choice of scenario outputs Truncates endpoint distance

11 OCA 572013

12

Potential Sources

Publicly available or proprietary models May account for more factors May provide more accurate estimates May require greater user knowledge and experience

If using a source other than OCA Guidance or RMPCompTM make sure the model inputs follow the specified requirements (ie facility-specific meteorological conditions)

Be able to provide a copy of the model and documentation upon request

OCA 572013

Simplified Illustration of Fictional Worst-Case and Alternative Release Scenarios on a Local Map

Source has 2 regulated Toxic substances 1 regulated Flammable substance

Source Boundary

Flammable WCS

Toxic ARS 2

Toxic ARS 1 A Street

Toxic WCS distance to endpoint 0 12 1

Rail Spur Miles

13 OCA 572013

14

Offsite ImpactsReceptors

Residential populations (the public) Based on latest census data or other updated information

Other public receptors Institutions (schools hospitals prisons) Local parks and recreation areas Commercial office and industrial buildings

OCA 572013

15

Offsite ImpactsReceptors

Environmental receptors or natural areas such as national or state parks forests or monuments that can be identified on local USGS maps including Wildlife preserves Federal and state parks Wilderness areas

OCA 572013

Obtaining Receptor Data

Census Publications of the Bureau of the Census including County and City

Data Book Bureau of the Census website wwwcensusgov

LandView httpwwwcensusgovgeolandview

USGS maps Online ordering site httpstoreusgsgov Additional info httpaskusgsgov 1-800-USA-MAPS

16 OCA 572013

17

Review and Update

Reevaluate if the worst-case vessel conditions change If the distance to endpoint increasesdecreases by a factor of 2

or more update the RMP within 6 months

Review and update all OCA elements every 5 years Ensure process conditions have not changed Ensure public and environmental receptors have not changed Update population numbers based on most recent census

Make sure to document that the review occurred If no changes at minimum have a signed ldquomemo to filerdquo indicating

what information was reviewed

OCA 572013

18

Common Errors and ldquoRed Flagsrdquo

Wrong release quantity Inconsistencies between release quantity and endpoint distance

(eg very large release quantity with very short endpoint distance)

No documentation corresponding to information provided in RMP

No documentation that information is reviewed every five years

Worst Case Vessel Rationale for selection not documented Wrong vessel identified

OCA 572013

-

Questions

19 OCA 572013

  • Offsite Consequences Analysis
  • Definitions
  • Required OCA Scenarios
  • Required OCA Scenarios
  • Mitigation Systems
  • Scenario Selection Requirements
  • Scenario Selection Requirements
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Required OCA Endpoints
  • Potential Sources
  • Potential Sources
  • Simplified Illustration of Fictional Worst-Case and Alternative Release Scenarios on a Local Map
  • Offsite ImpactsReceptors
  • Offsite ImpactsReceptors
  • Obtaining Receptor Data
  • Review and Update
  • Common Errors and ldquoRed Flagsrdquo
  • Questions
Page 5: Overview of hazard assessment for risk management program...OCA Guidance Simple generalized calculations ALOHA Models key hazards related to chemical releases that result in toxic

5

Mitigation Systems

Activities or equipment designed to contain released substances to minimize exposure

Passive mitigation Function without human mechanical or other energy input

Examples building enclosures dikes blast walls

Active mitigation Need human mechanical or other energy input to function

Examples interlocks shutdown systems pressure relieving devices flares emergency isolation systems water cannons

OCA 572013

6

Scenario Selection Requirements

Worst-case Greatest amount held in single vessel or pipe taking

into account administrative controls that limit inventory and passive mitigation

Also must consider scenarios involving Smaller quantities at higher process temperature or pressure Proximity to stationary source boundary

Must be the scenario with greatest offsite distance to endpoint

OCA 572013

7

Scenario Selection Requirements

Alternative Must reach offsite endpoint unless no such scenario

exists Must be more likely than worst-case scenario Can consider active mitigation Should consider 5-year release history and failure

scenarios identified in PHA or hazard review

OCA 572013

One Process

Worst case

Process vs Worst Case

88 OCA 572013

Process vs Worst Case

One Process

Worst case

9 OCA 572013 9

10

Required OCA Endpoints

Toxic substances Must use those provided in Appendix A of rule

Flammable substances Explosions 1 psi overpressure (endpoint required for

worst-case scenario) Flash fires lower flammability limit (LFL) Pooljet fires and fireballs 5 kWm2 for 40 seconds

(or equivalent)

OCA 572013

Potential Sources

OCA Guidance RMPCompTM

NOAA amp EPA developed software program Performs calculations described in OCA Guidance Simple generalized calculations

ALOHA Models key hazards related to chemical releases that result

in toxic gas dispersions fires andor explosions Greater user control of inputs flexibility in scenario choice

and choice of scenario outputs Truncates endpoint distance

11 OCA 572013

12

Potential Sources

Publicly available or proprietary models May account for more factors May provide more accurate estimates May require greater user knowledge and experience

If using a source other than OCA Guidance or RMPCompTM make sure the model inputs follow the specified requirements (ie facility-specific meteorological conditions)

Be able to provide a copy of the model and documentation upon request

OCA 572013

Simplified Illustration of Fictional Worst-Case and Alternative Release Scenarios on a Local Map

Source has 2 regulated Toxic substances 1 regulated Flammable substance

Source Boundary

Flammable WCS

Toxic ARS 2

Toxic ARS 1 A Street

Toxic WCS distance to endpoint 0 12 1

Rail Spur Miles

13 OCA 572013

14

Offsite ImpactsReceptors

Residential populations (the public) Based on latest census data or other updated information

Other public receptors Institutions (schools hospitals prisons) Local parks and recreation areas Commercial office and industrial buildings

OCA 572013

15

Offsite ImpactsReceptors

Environmental receptors or natural areas such as national or state parks forests or monuments that can be identified on local USGS maps including Wildlife preserves Federal and state parks Wilderness areas

OCA 572013

Obtaining Receptor Data

Census Publications of the Bureau of the Census including County and City

Data Book Bureau of the Census website wwwcensusgov

LandView httpwwwcensusgovgeolandview

USGS maps Online ordering site httpstoreusgsgov Additional info httpaskusgsgov 1-800-USA-MAPS

16 OCA 572013

17

Review and Update

Reevaluate if the worst-case vessel conditions change If the distance to endpoint increasesdecreases by a factor of 2

or more update the RMP within 6 months

Review and update all OCA elements every 5 years Ensure process conditions have not changed Ensure public and environmental receptors have not changed Update population numbers based on most recent census

Make sure to document that the review occurred If no changes at minimum have a signed ldquomemo to filerdquo indicating

what information was reviewed

OCA 572013

18

Common Errors and ldquoRed Flagsrdquo

Wrong release quantity Inconsistencies between release quantity and endpoint distance

(eg very large release quantity with very short endpoint distance)

No documentation corresponding to information provided in RMP

No documentation that information is reviewed every five years

Worst Case Vessel Rationale for selection not documented Wrong vessel identified

OCA 572013

-

Questions

19 OCA 572013

  • Offsite Consequences Analysis
  • Definitions
  • Required OCA Scenarios
  • Required OCA Scenarios
  • Mitigation Systems
  • Scenario Selection Requirements
  • Scenario Selection Requirements
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Required OCA Endpoints
  • Potential Sources
  • Potential Sources
  • Simplified Illustration of Fictional Worst-Case and Alternative Release Scenarios on a Local Map
  • Offsite ImpactsReceptors
  • Offsite ImpactsReceptors
  • Obtaining Receptor Data
  • Review and Update
  • Common Errors and ldquoRed Flagsrdquo
  • Questions
Page 6: Overview of hazard assessment for risk management program...OCA Guidance Simple generalized calculations ALOHA Models key hazards related to chemical releases that result in toxic

6

Scenario Selection Requirements

Worst-case Greatest amount held in single vessel or pipe taking

into account administrative controls that limit inventory and passive mitigation

Also must consider scenarios involving Smaller quantities at higher process temperature or pressure Proximity to stationary source boundary

Must be the scenario with greatest offsite distance to endpoint

OCA 572013

7

Scenario Selection Requirements

Alternative Must reach offsite endpoint unless no such scenario

exists Must be more likely than worst-case scenario Can consider active mitigation Should consider 5-year release history and failure

scenarios identified in PHA or hazard review

OCA 572013

One Process

Worst case

Process vs Worst Case

88 OCA 572013

Process vs Worst Case

One Process

Worst case

9 OCA 572013 9

10

Required OCA Endpoints

Toxic substances Must use those provided in Appendix A of rule

Flammable substances Explosions 1 psi overpressure (endpoint required for

worst-case scenario) Flash fires lower flammability limit (LFL) Pooljet fires and fireballs 5 kWm2 for 40 seconds

(or equivalent)

OCA 572013

Potential Sources

OCA Guidance RMPCompTM

NOAA amp EPA developed software program Performs calculations described in OCA Guidance Simple generalized calculations

ALOHA Models key hazards related to chemical releases that result

in toxic gas dispersions fires andor explosions Greater user control of inputs flexibility in scenario choice

and choice of scenario outputs Truncates endpoint distance

11 OCA 572013

12

Potential Sources

Publicly available or proprietary models May account for more factors May provide more accurate estimates May require greater user knowledge and experience

If using a source other than OCA Guidance or RMPCompTM make sure the model inputs follow the specified requirements (ie facility-specific meteorological conditions)

Be able to provide a copy of the model and documentation upon request

OCA 572013

Simplified Illustration of Fictional Worst-Case and Alternative Release Scenarios on a Local Map

Source has 2 regulated Toxic substances 1 regulated Flammable substance

Source Boundary

Flammable WCS

Toxic ARS 2

Toxic ARS 1 A Street

Toxic WCS distance to endpoint 0 12 1

Rail Spur Miles

13 OCA 572013

14

Offsite ImpactsReceptors

Residential populations (the public) Based on latest census data or other updated information

Other public receptors Institutions (schools hospitals prisons) Local parks and recreation areas Commercial office and industrial buildings

OCA 572013

15

Offsite ImpactsReceptors

Environmental receptors or natural areas such as national or state parks forests or monuments that can be identified on local USGS maps including Wildlife preserves Federal and state parks Wilderness areas

OCA 572013

Obtaining Receptor Data

Census Publications of the Bureau of the Census including County and City

Data Book Bureau of the Census website wwwcensusgov

LandView httpwwwcensusgovgeolandview

USGS maps Online ordering site httpstoreusgsgov Additional info httpaskusgsgov 1-800-USA-MAPS

16 OCA 572013

17

Review and Update

Reevaluate if the worst-case vessel conditions change If the distance to endpoint increasesdecreases by a factor of 2

or more update the RMP within 6 months

Review and update all OCA elements every 5 years Ensure process conditions have not changed Ensure public and environmental receptors have not changed Update population numbers based on most recent census

Make sure to document that the review occurred If no changes at minimum have a signed ldquomemo to filerdquo indicating

what information was reviewed

OCA 572013

18

Common Errors and ldquoRed Flagsrdquo

Wrong release quantity Inconsistencies between release quantity and endpoint distance

(eg very large release quantity with very short endpoint distance)

No documentation corresponding to information provided in RMP

No documentation that information is reviewed every five years

Worst Case Vessel Rationale for selection not documented Wrong vessel identified

OCA 572013

-

Questions

19 OCA 572013

  • Offsite Consequences Analysis
  • Definitions
  • Required OCA Scenarios
  • Required OCA Scenarios
  • Mitigation Systems
  • Scenario Selection Requirements
  • Scenario Selection Requirements
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Required OCA Endpoints
  • Potential Sources
  • Potential Sources
  • Simplified Illustration of Fictional Worst-Case and Alternative Release Scenarios on a Local Map
  • Offsite ImpactsReceptors
  • Offsite ImpactsReceptors
  • Obtaining Receptor Data
  • Review and Update
  • Common Errors and ldquoRed Flagsrdquo
  • Questions
Page 7: Overview of hazard assessment for risk management program...OCA Guidance Simple generalized calculations ALOHA Models key hazards related to chemical releases that result in toxic

7

Scenario Selection Requirements

Alternative Must reach offsite endpoint unless no such scenario

exists Must be more likely than worst-case scenario Can consider active mitigation Should consider 5-year release history and failure

scenarios identified in PHA or hazard review

OCA 572013

One Process

Worst case

Process vs Worst Case

88 OCA 572013

Process vs Worst Case

One Process

Worst case

9 OCA 572013 9

10

Required OCA Endpoints

Toxic substances Must use those provided in Appendix A of rule

Flammable substances Explosions 1 psi overpressure (endpoint required for

worst-case scenario) Flash fires lower flammability limit (LFL) Pooljet fires and fireballs 5 kWm2 for 40 seconds

(or equivalent)

OCA 572013

Potential Sources

OCA Guidance RMPCompTM

NOAA amp EPA developed software program Performs calculations described in OCA Guidance Simple generalized calculations

ALOHA Models key hazards related to chemical releases that result

in toxic gas dispersions fires andor explosions Greater user control of inputs flexibility in scenario choice

and choice of scenario outputs Truncates endpoint distance

11 OCA 572013

12

Potential Sources

Publicly available or proprietary models May account for more factors May provide more accurate estimates May require greater user knowledge and experience

If using a source other than OCA Guidance or RMPCompTM make sure the model inputs follow the specified requirements (ie facility-specific meteorological conditions)

Be able to provide a copy of the model and documentation upon request

OCA 572013

Simplified Illustration of Fictional Worst-Case and Alternative Release Scenarios on a Local Map

Source has 2 regulated Toxic substances 1 regulated Flammable substance

Source Boundary

Flammable WCS

Toxic ARS 2

Toxic ARS 1 A Street

Toxic WCS distance to endpoint 0 12 1

Rail Spur Miles

13 OCA 572013

14

Offsite ImpactsReceptors

Residential populations (the public) Based on latest census data or other updated information

Other public receptors Institutions (schools hospitals prisons) Local parks and recreation areas Commercial office and industrial buildings

OCA 572013

15

Offsite ImpactsReceptors

Environmental receptors or natural areas such as national or state parks forests or monuments that can be identified on local USGS maps including Wildlife preserves Federal and state parks Wilderness areas

OCA 572013

Obtaining Receptor Data

Census Publications of the Bureau of the Census including County and City

Data Book Bureau of the Census website wwwcensusgov

LandView httpwwwcensusgovgeolandview

USGS maps Online ordering site httpstoreusgsgov Additional info httpaskusgsgov 1-800-USA-MAPS

16 OCA 572013

17

Review and Update

Reevaluate if the worst-case vessel conditions change If the distance to endpoint increasesdecreases by a factor of 2

or more update the RMP within 6 months

Review and update all OCA elements every 5 years Ensure process conditions have not changed Ensure public and environmental receptors have not changed Update population numbers based on most recent census

Make sure to document that the review occurred If no changes at minimum have a signed ldquomemo to filerdquo indicating

what information was reviewed

OCA 572013

18

Common Errors and ldquoRed Flagsrdquo

Wrong release quantity Inconsistencies between release quantity and endpoint distance

(eg very large release quantity with very short endpoint distance)

No documentation corresponding to information provided in RMP

No documentation that information is reviewed every five years

Worst Case Vessel Rationale for selection not documented Wrong vessel identified

OCA 572013

-

Questions

19 OCA 572013

  • Offsite Consequences Analysis
  • Definitions
  • Required OCA Scenarios
  • Required OCA Scenarios
  • Mitigation Systems
  • Scenario Selection Requirements
  • Scenario Selection Requirements
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Required OCA Endpoints
  • Potential Sources
  • Potential Sources
  • Simplified Illustration of Fictional Worst-Case and Alternative Release Scenarios on a Local Map
  • Offsite ImpactsReceptors
  • Offsite ImpactsReceptors
  • Obtaining Receptor Data
  • Review and Update
  • Common Errors and ldquoRed Flagsrdquo
  • Questions
Page 8: Overview of hazard assessment for risk management program...OCA Guidance Simple generalized calculations ALOHA Models key hazards related to chemical releases that result in toxic

One Process

Worst case

Process vs Worst Case

88 OCA 572013

Process vs Worst Case

One Process

Worst case

9 OCA 572013 9

10

Required OCA Endpoints

Toxic substances Must use those provided in Appendix A of rule

Flammable substances Explosions 1 psi overpressure (endpoint required for

worst-case scenario) Flash fires lower flammability limit (LFL) Pooljet fires and fireballs 5 kWm2 for 40 seconds

(or equivalent)

OCA 572013

Potential Sources

OCA Guidance RMPCompTM

NOAA amp EPA developed software program Performs calculations described in OCA Guidance Simple generalized calculations

ALOHA Models key hazards related to chemical releases that result

in toxic gas dispersions fires andor explosions Greater user control of inputs flexibility in scenario choice

and choice of scenario outputs Truncates endpoint distance

11 OCA 572013

12

Potential Sources

Publicly available or proprietary models May account for more factors May provide more accurate estimates May require greater user knowledge and experience

If using a source other than OCA Guidance or RMPCompTM make sure the model inputs follow the specified requirements (ie facility-specific meteorological conditions)

Be able to provide a copy of the model and documentation upon request

OCA 572013

Simplified Illustration of Fictional Worst-Case and Alternative Release Scenarios on a Local Map

Source has 2 regulated Toxic substances 1 regulated Flammable substance

Source Boundary

Flammable WCS

Toxic ARS 2

Toxic ARS 1 A Street

Toxic WCS distance to endpoint 0 12 1

Rail Spur Miles

13 OCA 572013

14

Offsite ImpactsReceptors

Residential populations (the public) Based on latest census data or other updated information

Other public receptors Institutions (schools hospitals prisons) Local parks and recreation areas Commercial office and industrial buildings

OCA 572013

15

Offsite ImpactsReceptors

Environmental receptors or natural areas such as national or state parks forests or monuments that can be identified on local USGS maps including Wildlife preserves Federal and state parks Wilderness areas

OCA 572013

Obtaining Receptor Data

Census Publications of the Bureau of the Census including County and City

Data Book Bureau of the Census website wwwcensusgov

LandView httpwwwcensusgovgeolandview

USGS maps Online ordering site httpstoreusgsgov Additional info httpaskusgsgov 1-800-USA-MAPS

16 OCA 572013

17

Review and Update

Reevaluate if the worst-case vessel conditions change If the distance to endpoint increasesdecreases by a factor of 2

or more update the RMP within 6 months

Review and update all OCA elements every 5 years Ensure process conditions have not changed Ensure public and environmental receptors have not changed Update population numbers based on most recent census

Make sure to document that the review occurred If no changes at minimum have a signed ldquomemo to filerdquo indicating

what information was reviewed

OCA 572013

18

Common Errors and ldquoRed Flagsrdquo

Wrong release quantity Inconsistencies between release quantity and endpoint distance

(eg very large release quantity with very short endpoint distance)

No documentation corresponding to information provided in RMP

No documentation that information is reviewed every five years

Worst Case Vessel Rationale for selection not documented Wrong vessel identified

OCA 572013

-

Questions

19 OCA 572013

  • Offsite Consequences Analysis
  • Definitions
  • Required OCA Scenarios
  • Required OCA Scenarios
  • Mitigation Systems
  • Scenario Selection Requirements
  • Scenario Selection Requirements
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Required OCA Endpoints
  • Potential Sources
  • Potential Sources
  • Simplified Illustration of Fictional Worst-Case and Alternative Release Scenarios on a Local Map
  • Offsite ImpactsReceptors
  • Offsite ImpactsReceptors
  • Obtaining Receptor Data
  • Review and Update
  • Common Errors and ldquoRed Flagsrdquo
  • Questions
Page 9: Overview of hazard assessment for risk management program...OCA Guidance Simple generalized calculations ALOHA Models key hazards related to chemical releases that result in toxic

Process vs Worst Case

One Process

Worst case

9 OCA 572013 9

10

Required OCA Endpoints

Toxic substances Must use those provided in Appendix A of rule

Flammable substances Explosions 1 psi overpressure (endpoint required for

worst-case scenario) Flash fires lower flammability limit (LFL) Pooljet fires and fireballs 5 kWm2 for 40 seconds

(or equivalent)

OCA 572013

Potential Sources

OCA Guidance RMPCompTM

NOAA amp EPA developed software program Performs calculations described in OCA Guidance Simple generalized calculations

ALOHA Models key hazards related to chemical releases that result

in toxic gas dispersions fires andor explosions Greater user control of inputs flexibility in scenario choice

and choice of scenario outputs Truncates endpoint distance

11 OCA 572013

12

Potential Sources

Publicly available or proprietary models May account for more factors May provide more accurate estimates May require greater user knowledge and experience

If using a source other than OCA Guidance or RMPCompTM make sure the model inputs follow the specified requirements (ie facility-specific meteorological conditions)

Be able to provide a copy of the model and documentation upon request

OCA 572013

Simplified Illustration of Fictional Worst-Case and Alternative Release Scenarios on a Local Map

Source has 2 regulated Toxic substances 1 regulated Flammable substance

Source Boundary

Flammable WCS

Toxic ARS 2

Toxic ARS 1 A Street

Toxic WCS distance to endpoint 0 12 1

Rail Spur Miles

13 OCA 572013

14

Offsite ImpactsReceptors

Residential populations (the public) Based on latest census data or other updated information

Other public receptors Institutions (schools hospitals prisons) Local parks and recreation areas Commercial office and industrial buildings

OCA 572013

15

Offsite ImpactsReceptors

Environmental receptors or natural areas such as national or state parks forests or monuments that can be identified on local USGS maps including Wildlife preserves Federal and state parks Wilderness areas

OCA 572013

Obtaining Receptor Data

Census Publications of the Bureau of the Census including County and City

Data Book Bureau of the Census website wwwcensusgov

LandView httpwwwcensusgovgeolandview

USGS maps Online ordering site httpstoreusgsgov Additional info httpaskusgsgov 1-800-USA-MAPS

16 OCA 572013

17

Review and Update

Reevaluate if the worst-case vessel conditions change If the distance to endpoint increasesdecreases by a factor of 2

or more update the RMP within 6 months

Review and update all OCA elements every 5 years Ensure process conditions have not changed Ensure public and environmental receptors have not changed Update population numbers based on most recent census

Make sure to document that the review occurred If no changes at minimum have a signed ldquomemo to filerdquo indicating

what information was reviewed

OCA 572013

18

Common Errors and ldquoRed Flagsrdquo

Wrong release quantity Inconsistencies between release quantity and endpoint distance

(eg very large release quantity with very short endpoint distance)

No documentation corresponding to information provided in RMP

No documentation that information is reviewed every five years

Worst Case Vessel Rationale for selection not documented Wrong vessel identified

OCA 572013

-

Questions

19 OCA 572013

  • Offsite Consequences Analysis
  • Definitions
  • Required OCA Scenarios
  • Required OCA Scenarios
  • Mitigation Systems
  • Scenario Selection Requirements
  • Scenario Selection Requirements
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Required OCA Endpoints
  • Potential Sources
  • Potential Sources
  • Simplified Illustration of Fictional Worst-Case and Alternative Release Scenarios on a Local Map
  • Offsite ImpactsReceptors
  • Offsite ImpactsReceptors
  • Obtaining Receptor Data
  • Review and Update
  • Common Errors and ldquoRed Flagsrdquo
  • Questions
Page 10: Overview of hazard assessment for risk management program...OCA Guidance Simple generalized calculations ALOHA Models key hazards related to chemical releases that result in toxic

10

Required OCA Endpoints

Toxic substances Must use those provided in Appendix A of rule

Flammable substances Explosions 1 psi overpressure (endpoint required for

worst-case scenario) Flash fires lower flammability limit (LFL) Pooljet fires and fireballs 5 kWm2 for 40 seconds

(or equivalent)

OCA 572013

Potential Sources

OCA Guidance RMPCompTM

NOAA amp EPA developed software program Performs calculations described in OCA Guidance Simple generalized calculations

ALOHA Models key hazards related to chemical releases that result

in toxic gas dispersions fires andor explosions Greater user control of inputs flexibility in scenario choice

and choice of scenario outputs Truncates endpoint distance

11 OCA 572013

12

Potential Sources

Publicly available or proprietary models May account for more factors May provide more accurate estimates May require greater user knowledge and experience

If using a source other than OCA Guidance or RMPCompTM make sure the model inputs follow the specified requirements (ie facility-specific meteorological conditions)

Be able to provide a copy of the model and documentation upon request

OCA 572013

Simplified Illustration of Fictional Worst-Case and Alternative Release Scenarios on a Local Map

Source has 2 regulated Toxic substances 1 regulated Flammable substance

Source Boundary

Flammable WCS

Toxic ARS 2

Toxic ARS 1 A Street

Toxic WCS distance to endpoint 0 12 1

Rail Spur Miles

13 OCA 572013

14

Offsite ImpactsReceptors

Residential populations (the public) Based on latest census data or other updated information

Other public receptors Institutions (schools hospitals prisons) Local parks and recreation areas Commercial office and industrial buildings

OCA 572013

15

Offsite ImpactsReceptors

Environmental receptors or natural areas such as national or state parks forests or monuments that can be identified on local USGS maps including Wildlife preserves Federal and state parks Wilderness areas

OCA 572013

Obtaining Receptor Data

Census Publications of the Bureau of the Census including County and City

Data Book Bureau of the Census website wwwcensusgov

LandView httpwwwcensusgovgeolandview

USGS maps Online ordering site httpstoreusgsgov Additional info httpaskusgsgov 1-800-USA-MAPS

16 OCA 572013

17

Review and Update

Reevaluate if the worst-case vessel conditions change If the distance to endpoint increasesdecreases by a factor of 2

or more update the RMP within 6 months

Review and update all OCA elements every 5 years Ensure process conditions have not changed Ensure public and environmental receptors have not changed Update population numbers based on most recent census

Make sure to document that the review occurred If no changes at minimum have a signed ldquomemo to filerdquo indicating

what information was reviewed

OCA 572013

18

Common Errors and ldquoRed Flagsrdquo

Wrong release quantity Inconsistencies between release quantity and endpoint distance

(eg very large release quantity with very short endpoint distance)

No documentation corresponding to information provided in RMP

No documentation that information is reviewed every five years

Worst Case Vessel Rationale for selection not documented Wrong vessel identified

OCA 572013

-

Questions

19 OCA 572013

  • Offsite Consequences Analysis
  • Definitions
  • Required OCA Scenarios
  • Required OCA Scenarios
  • Mitigation Systems
  • Scenario Selection Requirements
  • Scenario Selection Requirements
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Required OCA Endpoints
  • Potential Sources
  • Potential Sources
  • Simplified Illustration of Fictional Worst-Case and Alternative Release Scenarios on a Local Map
  • Offsite ImpactsReceptors
  • Offsite ImpactsReceptors
  • Obtaining Receptor Data
  • Review and Update
  • Common Errors and ldquoRed Flagsrdquo
  • Questions
Page 11: Overview of hazard assessment for risk management program...OCA Guidance Simple generalized calculations ALOHA Models key hazards related to chemical releases that result in toxic

Potential Sources

OCA Guidance RMPCompTM

NOAA amp EPA developed software program Performs calculations described in OCA Guidance Simple generalized calculations

ALOHA Models key hazards related to chemical releases that result

in toxic gas dispersions fires andor explosions Greater user control of inputs flexibility in scenario choice

and choice of scenario outputs Truncates endpoint distance

11 OCA 572013

12

Potential Sources

Publicly available or proprietary models May account for more factors May provide more accurate estimates May require greater user knowledge and experience

If using a source other than OCA Guidance or RMPCompTM make sure the model inputs follow the specified requirements (ie facility-specific meteorological conditions)

Be able to provide a copy of the model and documentation upon request

OCA 572013

Simplified Illustration of Fictional Worst-Case and Alternative Release Scenarios on a Local Map

Source has 2 regulated Toxic substances 1 regulated Flammable substance

Source Boundary

Flammable WCS

Toxic ARS 2

Toxic ARS 1 A Street

Toxic WCS distance to endpoint 0 12 1

Rail Spur Miles

13 OCA 572013

14

Offsite ImpactsReceptors

Residential populations (the public) Based on latest census data or other updated information

Other public receptors Institutions (schools hospitals prisons) Local parks and recreation areas Commercial office and industrial buildings

OCA 572013

15

Offsite ImpactsReceptors

Environmental receptors or natural areas such as national or state parks forests or monuments that can be identified on local USGS maps including Wildlife preserves Federal and state parks Wilderness areas

OCA 572013

Obtaining Receptor Data

Census Publications of the Bureau of the Census including County and City

Data Book Bureau of the Census website wwwcensusgov

LandView httpwwwcensusgovgeolandview

USGS maps Online ordering site httpstoreusgsgov Additional info httpaskusgsgov 1-800-USA-MAPS

16 OCA 572013

17

Review and Update

Reevaluate if the worst-case vessel conditions change If the distance to endpoint increasesdecreases by a factor of 2

or more update the RMP within 6 months

Review and update all OCA elements every 5 years Ensure process conditions have not changed Ensure public and environmental receptors have not changed Update population numbers based on most recent census

Make sure to document that the review occurred If no changes at minimum have a signed ldquomemo to filerdquo indicating

what information was reviewed

OCA 572013

18

Common Errors and ldquoRed Flagsrdquo

Wrong release quantity Inconsistencies between release quantity and endpoint distance

(eg very large release quantity with very short endpoint distance)

No documentation corresponding to information provided in RMP

No documentation that information is reviewed every five years

Worst Case Vessel Rationale for selection not documented Wrong vessel identified

OCA 572013

-

Questions

19 OCA 572013

  • Offsite Consequences Analysis
  • Definitions
  • Required OCA Scenarios
  • Required OCA Scenarios
  • Mitigation Systems
  • Scenario Selection Requirements
  • Scenario Selection Requirements
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Required OCA Endpoints
  • Potential Sources
  • Potential Sources
  • Simplified Illustration of Fictional Worst-Case and Alternative Release Scenarios on a Local Map
  • Offsite ImpactsReceptors
  • Offsite ImpactsReceptors
  • Obtaining Receptor Data
  • Review and Update
  • Common Errors and ldquoRed Flagsrdquo
  • Questions
Page 12: Overview of hazard assessment for risk management program...OCA Guidance Simple generalized calculations ALOHA Models key hazards related to chemical releases that result in toxic

12

Potential Sources

Publicly available or proprietary models May account for more factors May provide more accurate estimates May require greater user knowledge and experience

If using a source other than OCA Guidance or RMPCompTM make sure the model inputs follow the specified requirements (ie facility-specific meteorological conditions)

Be able to provide a copy of the model and documentation upon request

OCA 572013

Simplified Illustration of Fictional Worst-Case and Alternative Release Scenarios on a Local Map

Source has 2 regulated Toxic substances 1 regulated Flammable substance

Source Boundary

Flammable WCS

Toxic ARS 2

Toxic ARS 1 A Street

Toxic WCS distance to endpoint 0 12 1

Rail Spur Miles

13 OCA 572013

14

Offsite ImpactsReceptors

Residential populations (the public) Based on latest census data or other updated information

Other public receptors Institutions (schools hospitals prisons) Local parks and recreation areas Commercial office and industrial buildings

OCA 572013

15

Offsite ImpactsReceptors

Environmental receptors or natural areas such as national or state parks forests or monuments that can be identified on local USGS maps including Wildlife preserves Federal and state parks Wilderness areas

OCA 572013

Obtaining Receptor Data

Census Publications of the Bureau of the Census including County and City

Data Book Bureau of the Census website wwwcensusgov

LandView httpwwwcensusgovgeolandview

USGS maps Online ordering site httpstoreusgsgov Additional info httpaskusgsgov 1-800-USA-MAPS

16 OCA 572013

17

Review and Update

Reevaluate if the worst-case vessel conditions change If the distance to endpoint increasesdecreases by a factor of 2

or more update the RMP within 6 months

Review and update all OCA elements every 5 years Ensure process conditions have not changed Ensure public and environmental receptors have not changed Update population numbers based on most recent census

Make sure to document that the review occurred If no changes at minimum have a signed ldquomemo to filerdquo indicating

what information was reviewed

OCA 572013

18

Common Errors and ldquoRed Flagsrdquo

Wrong release quantity Inconsistencies between release quantity and endpoint distance

(eg very large release quantity with very short endpoint distance)

No documentation corresponding to information provided in RMP

No documentation that information is reviewed every five years

Worst Case Vessel Rationale for selection not documented Wrong vessel identified

OCA 572013

-

Questions

19 OCA 572013

  • Offsite Consequences Analysis
  • Definitions
  • Required OCA Scenarios
  • Required OCA Scenarios
  • Mitigation Systems
  • Scenario Selection Requirements
  • Scenario Selection Requirements
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Required OCA Endpoints
  • Potential Sources
  • Potential Sources
  • Simplified Illustration of Fictional Worst-Case and Alternative Release Scenarios on a Local Map
  • Offsite ImpactsReceptors
  • Offsite ImpactsReceptors
  • Obtaining Receptor Data
  • Review and Update
  • Common Errors and ldquoRed Flagsrdquo
  • Questions
Page 13: Overview of hazard assessment for risk management program...OCA Guidance Simple generalized calculations ALOHA Models key hazards related to chemical releases that result in toxic

Simplified Illustration of Fictional Worst-Case and Alternative Release Scenarios on a Local Map

Source has 2 regulated Toxic substances 1 regulated Flammable substance

Source Boundary

Flammable WCS

Toxic ARS 2

Toxic ARS 1 A Street

Toxic WCS distance to endpoint 0 12 1

Rail Spur Miles

13 OCA 572013

14

Offsite ImpactsReceptors

Residential populations (the public) Based on latest census data or other updated information

Other public receptors Institutions (schools hospitals prisons) Local parks and recreation areas Commercial office and industrial buildings

OCA 572013

15

Offsite ImpactsReceptors

Environmental receptors or natural areas such as national or state parks forests or monuments that can be identified on local USGS maps including Wildlife preserves Federal and state parks Wilderness areas

OCA 572013

Obtaining Receptor Data

Census Publications of the Bureau of the Census including County and City

Data Book Bureau of the Census website wwwcensusgov

LandView httpwwwcensusgovgeolandview

USGS maps Online ordering site httpstoreusgsgov Additional info httpaskusgsgov 1-800-USA-MAPS

16 OCA 572013

17

Review and Update

Reevaluate if the worst-case vessel conditions change If the distance to endpoint increasesdecreases by a factor of 2

or more update the RMP within 6 months

Review and update all OCA elements every 5 years Ensure process conditions have not changed Ensure public and environmental receptors have not changed Update population numbers based on most recent census

Make sure to document that the review occurred If no changes at minimum have a signed ldquomemo to filerdquo indicating

what information was reviewed

OCA 572013

18

Common Errors and ldquoRed Flagsrdquo

Wrong release quantity Inconsistencies between release quantity and endpoint distance

(eg very large release quantity with very short endpoint distance)

No documentation corresponding to information provided in RMP

No documentation that information is reviewed every five years

Worst Case Vessel Rationale for selection not documented Wrong vessel identified

OCA 572013

-

Questions

19 OCA 572013

  • Offsite Consequences Analysis
  • Definitions
  • Required OCA Scenarios
  • Required OCA Scenarios
  • Mitigation Systems
  • Scenario Selection Requirements
  • Scenario Selection Requirements
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Required OCA Endpoints
  • Potential Sources
  • Potential Sources
  • Simplified Illustration of Fictional Worst-Case and Alternative Release Scenarios on a Local Map
  • Offsite ImpactsReceptors
  • Offsite ImpactsReceptors
  • Obtaining Receptor Data
  • Review and Update
  • Common Errors and ldquoRed Flagsrdquo
  • Questions
Page 14: Overview of hazard assessment for risk management program...OCA Guidance Simple generalized calculations ALOHA Models key hazards related to chemical releases that result in toxic

14

Offsite ImpactsReceptors

Residential populations (the public) Based on latest census data or other updated information

Other public receptors Institutions (schools hospitals prisons) Local parks and recreation areas Commercial office and industrial buildings

OCA 572013

15

Offsite ImpactsReceptors

Environmental receptors or natural areas such as national or state parks forests or monuments that can be identified on local USGS maps including Wildlife preserves Federal and state parks Wilderness areas

OCA 572013

Obtaining Receptor Data

Census Publications of the Bureau of the Census including County and City

Data Book Bureau of the Census website wwwcensusgov

LandView httpwwwcensusgovgeolandview

USGS maps Online ordering site httpstoreusgsgov Additional info httpaskusgsgov 1-800-USA-MAPS

16 OCA 572013

17

Review and Update

Reevaluate if the worst-case vessel conditions change If the distance to endpoint increasesdecreases by a factor of 2

or more update the RMP within 6 months

Review and update all OCA elements every 5 years Ensure process conditions have not changed Ensure public and environmental receptors have not changed Update population numbers based on most recent census

Make sure to document that the review occurred If no changes at minimum have a signed ldquomemo to filerdquo indicating

what information was reviewed

OCA 572013

18

Common Errors and ldquoRed Flagsrdquo

Wrong release quantity Inconsistencies between release quantity and endpoint distance

(eg very large release quantity with very short endpoint distance)

No documentation corresponding to information provided in RMP

No documentation that information is reviewed every five years

Worst Case Vessel Rationale for selection not documented Wrong vessel identified

OCA 572013

-

Questions

19 OCA 572013

  • Offsite Consequences Analysis
  • Definitions
  • Required OCA Scenarios
  • Required OCA Scenarios
  • Mitigation Systems
  • Scenario Selection Requirements
  • Scenario Selection Requirements
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Required OCA Endpoints
  • Potential Sources
  • Potential Sources
  • Simplified Illustration of Fictional Worst-Case and Alternative Release Scenarios on a Local Map
  • Offsite ImpactsReceptors
  • Offsite ImpactsReceptors
  • Obtaining Receptor Data
  • Review and Update
  • Common Errors and ldquoRed Flagsrdquo
  • Questions
Page 15: Overview of hazard assessment for risk management program...OCA Guidance Simple generalized calculations ALOHA Models key hazards related to chemical releases that result in toxic

15

Offsite ImpactsReceptors

Environmental receptors or natural areas such as national or state parks forests or monuments that can be identified on local USGS maps including Wildlife preserves Federal and state parks Wilderness areas

OCA 572013

Obtaining Receptor Data

Census Publications of the Bureau of the Census including County and City

Data Book Bureau of the Census website wwwcensusgov

LandView httpwwwcensusgovgeolandview

USGS maps Online ordering site httpstoreusgsgov Additional info httpaskusgsgov 1-800-USA-MAPS

16 OCA 572013

17

Review and Update

Reevaluate if the worst-case vessel conditions change If the distance to endpoint increasesdecreases by a factor of 2

or more update the RMP within 6 months

Review and update all OCA elements every 5 years Ensure process conditions have not changed Ensure public and environmental receptors have not changed Update population numbers based on most recent census

Make sure to document that the review occurred If no changes at minimum have a signed ldquomemo to filerdquo indicating

what information was reviewed

OCA 572013

18

Common Errors and ldquoRed Flagsrdquo

Wrong release quantity Inconsistencies between release quantity and endpoint distance

(eg very large release quantity with very short endpoint distance)

No documentation corresponding to information provided in RMP

No documentation that information is reviewed every five years

Worst Case Vessel Rationale for selection not documented Wrong vessel identified

OCA 572013

-

Questions

19 OCA 572013

  • Offsite Consequences Analysis
  • Definitions
  • Required OCA Scenarios
  • Required OCA Scenarios
  • Mitigation Systems
  • Scenario Selection Requirements
  • Scenario Selection Requirements
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Required OCA Endpoints
  • Potential Sources
  • Potential Sources
  • Simplified Illustration of Fictional Worst-Case and Alternative Release Scenarios on a Local Map
  • Offsite ImpactsReceptors
  • Offsite ImpactsReceptors
  • Obtaining Receptor Data
  • Review and Update
  • Common Errors and ldquoRed Flagsrdquo
  • Questions
Page 16: Overview of hazard assessment for risk management program...OCA Guidance Simple generalized calculations ALOHA Models key hazards related to chemical releases that result in toxic

Obtaining Receptor Data

Census Publications of the Bureau of the Census including County and City

Data Book Bureau of the Census website wwwcensusgov

LandView httpwwwcensusgovgeolandview

USGS maps Online ordering site httpstoreusgsgov Additional info httpaskusgsgov 1-800-USA-MAPS

16 OCA 572013

17

Review and Update

Reevaluate if the worst-case vessel conditions change If the distance to endpoint increasesdecreases by a factor of 2

or more update the RMP within 6 months

Review and update all OCA elements every 5 years Ensure process conditions have not changed Ensure public and environmental receptors have not changed Update population numbers based on most recent census

Make sure to document that the review occurred If no changes at minimum have a signed ldquomemo to filerdquo indicating

what information was reviewed

OCA 572013

18

Common Errors and ldquoRed Flagsrdquo

Wrong release quantity Inconsistencies between release quantity and endpoint distance

(eg very large release quantity with very short endpoint distance)

No documentation corresponding to information provided in RMP

No documentation that information is reviewed every five years

Worst Case Vessel Rationale for selection not documented Wrong vessel identified

OCA 572013

-

Questions

19 OCA 572013

  • Offsite Consequences Analysis
  • Definitions
  • Required OCA Scenarios
  • Required OCA Scenarios
  • Mitigation Systems
  • Scenario Selection Requirements
  • Scenario Selection Requirements
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Required OCA Endpoints
  • Potential Sources
  • Potential Sources
  • Simplified Illustration of Fictional Worst-Case and Alternative Release Scenarios on a Local Map
  • Offsite ImpactsReceptors
  • Offsite ImpactsReceptors
  • Obtaining Receptor Data
  • Review and Update
  • Common Errors and ldquoRed Flagsrdquo
  • Questions
Page 17: Overview of hazard assessment for risk management program...OCA Guidance Simple generalized calculations ALOHA Models key hazards related to chemical releases that result in toxic

17

Review and Update

Reevaluate if the worst-case vessel conditions change If the distance to endpoint increasesdecreases by a factor of 2

or more update the RMP within 6 months

Review and update all OCA elements every 5 years Ensure process conditions have not changed Ensure public and environmental receptors have not changed Update population numbers based on most recent census

Make sure to document that the review occurred If no changes at minimum have a signed ldquomemo to filerdquo indicating

what information was reviewed

OCA 572013

18

Common Errors and ldquoRed Flagsrdquo

Wrong release quantity Inconsistencies between release quantity and endpoint distance

(eg very large release quantity with very short endpoint distance)

No documentation corresponding to information provided in RMP

No documentation that information is reviewed every five years

Worst Case Vessel Rationale for selection not documented Wrong vessel identified

OCA 572013

-

Questions

19 OCA 572013

  • Offsite Consequences Analysis
  • Definitions
  • Required OCA Scenarios
  • Required OCA Scenarios
  • Mitigation Systems
  • Scenario Selection Requirements
  • Scenario Selection Requirements
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Required OCA Endpoints
  • Potential Sources
  • Potential Sources
  • Simplified Illustration of Fictional Worst-Case and Alternative Release Scenarios on a Local Map
  • Offsite ImpactsReceptors
  • Offsite ImpactsReceptors
  • Obtaining Receptor Data
  • Review and Update
  • Common Errors and ldquoRed Flagsrdquo
  • Questions
Page 18: Overview of hazard assessment for risk management program...OCA Guidance Simple generalized calculations ALOHA Models key hazards related to chemical releases that result in toxic

18

Common Errors and ldquoRed Flagsrdquo

Wrong release quantity Inconsistencies between release quantity and endpoint distance

(eg very large release quantity with very short endpoint distance)

No documentation corresponding to information provided in RMP

No documentation that information is reviewed every five years

Worst Case Vessel Rationale for selection not documented Wrong vessel identified

OCA 572013

-

Questions

19 OCA 572013

  • Offsite Consequences Analysis
  • Definitions
  • Required OCA Scenarios
  • Required OCA Scenarios
  • Mitigation Systems
  • Scenario Selection Requirements
  • Scenario Selection Requirements
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Required OCA Endpoints
  • Potential Sources
  • Potential Sources
  • Simplified Illustration of Fictional Worst-Case and Alternative Release Scenarios on a Local Map
  • Offsite ImpactsReceptors
  • Offsite ImpactsReceptors
  • Obtaining Receptor Data
  • Review and Update
  • Common Errors and ldquoRed Flagsrdquo
  • Questions
Page 19: Overview of hazard assessment for risk management program...OCA Guidance Simple generalized calculations ALOHA Models key hazards related to chemical releases that result in toxic

-

Questions

19 OCA 572013

  • Offsite Consequences Analysis
  • Definitions
  • Required OCA Scenarios
  • Required OCA Scenarios
  • Mitigation Systems
  • Scenario Selection Requirements
  • Scenario Selection Requirements
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Required OCA Endpoints
  • Potential Sources
  • Potential Sources
  • Simplified Illustration of Fictional Worst-Case and Alternative Release Scenarios on a Local Map
  • Offsite ImpactsReceptors
  • Offsite ImpactsReceptors
  • Obtaining Receptor Data
  • Review and Update
  • Common Errors and ldquoRed Flagsrdquo
  • Questions