overview of key trends, 2009
DESCRIPTION
Overview of Key Trends, 2009. Presented to Council 27 November 2009 Prof N B Pityana Vice-Chancellor & Principal. HEMIS Enrolment Trends, 2004-10. HEMIS Enrolment Trends, 2004-10. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Overview of Key Trends, 2009
Presented to Council27 November 2009
Prof N B PityanaVice-Chancellor & Principal
HEMIS Enrolment Trends, 2004-10
2004 2005 2006 2007 (Active Only)
2008 (Active Only)
2009 (1st Sub)
2009 (2nd Sub To Date)
2009 (Pred. Active
HC)
2010 (MoE
Target)- 50 000
0
50 000
100 000
150 000
200 000
250 000
300 000
HEMIS Enrolment Trends, 2004-10• Headcount enrolments expanded steadily
between 2004 and 2008 from 205 811 to 261 927 – despite the fact that from 2007 onwards, only active students were counted
• In 2009, for the first time, Unisa’s student enrolments flattened out– The 2009 1st HEMIS submission counted 237 473 – a
substantial drop of 9,3% over the previous year. This can be explained by the later exam date and consequently fewer financial cancellation reinstatements by the HEMIS census date
– This explanation is corroborated by the provisional 2009 2nd submission which shows 255 904 active headcounts to date. This indicates that a substantial number of financial cancellations have already been reinstated
– On this basis, DISA predicts a final active HC total of 260 749 for 2009 – slightly above the 2010 Ministerial target
Success Rates, 2004-8
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2010 MoE
Target
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Success Rates, 2004-8 • Unisa’s FTE Success Rates have increased from
52,06% in 2004 to 54,89% in 2008 – despite a decline to 50,65% in 2006
• This steady increase augers well for the achievement of the 2010 Ministerial target of 56% by 2010
Current Institutional Performance against 2015 Strategic Plan: Scorecard of 17 PIs Performance
Trend Performance
Indicator Target Target Date
Current Performance
Current Performance Against Target
Prognosis of Meeting Target
PI 15: Personnel expenditure as a proportion of total expenditure, 2004-8 59% 2008 59,1 0,1 Above Target Reached
PI 2: Headcount Enrolments, 2006-9 235 000 250 000
2010 2015 261 927 +3 000 Above Target Reached
PI 14: Assets-to-liabilities ratio 2004-8 3,5 2008 3,9 0,4 Above Target Reached PI 16: Nett surplus as a proportion of annual
turnover, 2004-8 5% 2008 6,7% 1,7% Above Target Reached
PI 6: Increase in Accredited Research outputs per year 2006–10 70 2010 -31,9 101,9 Below Target Possible PI 9: Accumulated Total Thuthuka grant holders 2004-9 250 2015 177 73 Below Target Probable PI 13: Proportion (ETD) Expenditure of Payroll per annum 3% of Payroll 2015 1% 2% Below target Possible
PI 4: Unisa’s position among South African universities in terms of research outputs, 2007 5th Position 2015 6th Position 1 Above Target Unlikely PI 5: Unisa NRF Rated Researchers 2004-9 250
10 2015 122 128 Below target 6 Above target Possible
PI 7: Research outputs/academic against 2015 & DoE Targets, 2004-7
1,0 1,15 2015 0,42 0,48 below Target Unlikely
PI 10: Annual dropout Rates 2004-7 3% 2015 11% 14% Above target Unlikely PI 11: Aggregate Course Success Rate against 2010 Ministerial Target, 2004-7 3% 2015 1,1% 2,9% Above Target Possible PI 17: Academic & Academic Professional Staff-to-Admin Staff Ratio 2004-8 45:55 2015 68:32 Ratio too high Unlikely
PI 1: General Unisa Satisfaction Index (GUSI) 100% 2015 63,15% 36,85 below target Improbable PI 3: Academic Staff/Student Ratio, 2004-8 174 2015 140 34 Above Target Improbable PI 8:% Change in PG Headcounts and Graduations
25% 25% 2015 -3%
-30% 28% Below Target 33% Below Target Improbable
PI 12: Annual alumni contributions 2004-8 R3 M Annual R122 654 R2,878,000 below target Improbable
Performance on 84 Targetsin Unisa 2015 Strategic Plan
Overall Performance Targets on Track - % Complete
Performance on 84 Targetsin Unisa 2015 Strategic Plan• The 5-year review of progress towards the
achievement of the 2015 Strategic Plan targets showed that progress towards the original 2015 targets can be described as generally on track. Of the 84 targets:– 35 (41,7%) original and revised targets have been
reached– 6 (7,1%) original targets have not been reached– 22 (26,2%) original and revised targets are on track– 16 (19,0%) original and revised targets are not on track– 5 (6,0%) targets have shifted or are unclear
• In addition, of the 21 targets on track, 6 were between 75% - 99% complete, and a further 6 were above 50% complete
Performance Trends & Prognosis,17 2015 SP KPIs
Positive Trend
Sideways Trend
Negative Trend
Positive Trend
Sideways Trend
Negative Trend
Target Reached Target Not Reached
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Reached Probable/ Possible
Unlikely Improbable 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
• Of the 17 KPIs in the 2015 Plan:– 4 targets had been reached. Of these, 1
showed a positive trend, 2 showed a sideways trend and 1 a negative trend
– 13 targets had not yet been reached. Of these 3 showed a positive trend, 6 a sideways trend and 4 a negative trend
• The prognosis for achieving these targets was as follows:– 4 targets had been reached– 5 targets will probably/possibly be reached– It is unlikely that 4 of the targets will be
reached– It is improbable that 4 other targets will be
reached
Performance Trends & Prognosis,17 2015 SP KPIs
Summary of Projections, 2009-13
Prov. 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Average annual
increase: 2009-13
HC Enrolments (active)
257 071 269 731 282 987 297 028 311 814 3,5%
FTE Enrolments130 758 137 048 143 756 150 846 158 334 3,5%
FTE Degree Credits (course success) 72 103 77 040 82 121 87 600 93 481 0,4%Graduates 18 200 18 558 18 923 19 295 19 674 1,9%Permanent Staff: Headcount 4 410 4 321 4 477 4 602 4 910 4,3%Staff FTE(perm & temp) 5 045 4 933 5 094 5 204 5 488 3,8%Publication Units 620 680 740 780 820 7,5%Academic staff with Ds 520 531 570 587 625 5,9%Academic staff with Ms 377 385 413 425 453 5,9%Masters graduates 120 135 147 155 165 12,6%Doctoral graduates 73 80 86 87 90 6,1%Total Research Outputs 813 895 973 1 022 1 075 4,5%
Summary of Projections, 2009-13• Unisa recently submitted its provisional
Enrolment Statement to the DoHET in accordance with requirements
• This table summarises the provisional projections in key areas for the period 2009-13
The Challenge of Managing Unfunded Students
Subsidy Criteria
HEMIS 2005
HEMIS 2006
HEMIS 2007
HEMIS 2008
Projected HEMIS
2009
Projected HEMIS
2010
2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13
Actual WFTE 83
557,8990
802,6695
886,99109
460,57114
933,60120
680,28
Adjusted WFTE 79
355,1982
898,0087
044,0092
074,3297
079,85102
066,30
Unfunded WFTE 4 202,69 7 904,66 8 842,9917
386,2517
853,7518
613,98Unfunded subsidy value (mill) R 32,4 R 65,0 R 79,9 R 173,1 R 186,1 R 202,7
The Challenge of Managing Unfunded Students• A key challenge facing Unisa is the number of
unfunded students which arise from the capping of teaching input units allocated to HEIs according to the long-term government funding framework
• It can be seen that by 2012/13, a subsidy loss of R202,7m will have accumulated
• Subsequent iterations of the planning process will have to address this problem