overview of the atlas electromagnetic compatibility policy g. blanchot cern, ch-1211 geneva 23,...

16
Overview of the ATLAS Electromagnetic Compatibility Policy G. BLANCHOT CERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland [email protected] 10th Workshop on Electronics for LHC and future Experiments 13 - 17 September 2004, BOSTON, USA

Upload: gordon-lang

Post on 03-Jan-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Overview of the ATLAS Electromagnetic Compatibility Policy G. BLANCHOT CERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland Georges.Blanchot@cern.ch 10th Workshop on Electronics

Overview of the ATLAS Electromagnetic Compatibility Policy

G. BLANCHOTCERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland

[email protected]

10th Workshop on Electronics for LHC and future Experiments

13 - 17 September 2004, BOSTON, USA

Page 2: Overview of the ATLAS Electromagnetic Compatibility Policy G. BLANCHOT CERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland Georges.Blanchot@cern.ch 10th Workshop on Electronics

LECC 2004 G. Blanchot, CERN 2

ATLAS EMC Policy

Reference document is available at: https://edms.cern.ch/file/476490/1/ATLAS-EMC-POLICY.pdfAdditional Information is available at: http://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/FRONTEND/EMC/

Addressed issues:

1. Compliance to CERN electrical safety rules.

2. Immunity against conducted and radiated electromagnetic interferences.

3. Control of interferences down to a level compatible with the required performance of ATLAS.

TC to insure the application of good EMC practices at design, production, installation and operation levels.

EMC in TC

Quality Insurance

Risk Management

TC to identify potential risks of malfunctions and degraded performance .

Req

uire

d P

erfo

rman

ce

Page 3: Overview of the ATLAS Electromagnetic Compatibility Policy G. BLANCHOT CERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland Georges.Blanchot@cern.ch 10th Workshop on Electronics

LECC 2004 G. Blanchot, CERN 3

EMC Implementation in ATLAS

1

2

3

Setup definition: Contact person for safety and EMC. How the system must be installed and connected to be operated safely. Fault conditions and protections. Neighbors and the routing of cables.

EMC Conformance:Compatibility Limits.Key parameters: clock frequency, bandwidth, thresholds, intrinsic noise, etc… Conducted noise in cables.CM susceptibility via LVPS cabling.Cable shields requirements.

Commissioning:Cross check compliance to safety rule.Cross check conducted noise levels.

Page 4: Overview of the ATLAS Electromagnetic Compatibility Policy G. BLANCHOT CERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland Georges.Blanchot@cern.ch 10th Workshop on Electronics

LECC 2004 G. Blanchot, CERN 4

Grounding Configurations

In compliance with the CERN electrical codesL1L2L3N

PE

L+

L -

PE

L+

PEN

L+L -

PE

TN-S AC Scheme: separation of neutral and PE. Requires ground fault interruptor.

TN-S DC Scheme: separation of return and PE. Requires over current protection.

IT DC Scheme: floating. Permanent isolation controller (CPI) and over current protection.

TN-C DC Scheme: return and PE are common at source. Requires over current protection.

L+

PEN

TN-C DC Scheme: return and PE are common at load. Requires over current protection.

Page 5: Overview of the ATLAS Electromagnetic Compatibility Policy G. BLANCHOT CERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland Georges.Blanchot@cern.ch 10th Workshop on Electronics

LECC 2004 G. Blanchot, CERN 5

Electromagnetic EnvironmentSystems

Tile CalorimeterLiquid Argon Calorimeter Inner DetectorMuons Detector

Toroid Magnet Solenoid

40 m

25 m

Large dimension shielded systems.

Tight gaps between systems over large surfaces.

No interconnect between systems.

Presence of magnetic field.

Difficult grounding with long cables.

Power demanding (4MW) with DC/DC converters.

System clock 40 MHz.

Page 6: Overview of the ATLAS Electromagnetic Compatibility Policy G. BLANCHOT CERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland Georges.Blanchot@cern.ch 10th Workshop on Electronics

LECC 2004 G. Blanchot, CERN 6

Electromagnetic EnvironmentCabling

Very dense cabling into grounded cable trays.

High density of trays.

Long cables (> 100 m).

Trays contain power and data cables, not always possible to separate them.

Page 7: Overview of the ATLAS Electromagnetic Compatibility Policy G. BLANCHOT CERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland Georges.Blanchot@cern.ch 10th Workshop on Electronics

LECC 2004 G. Blanchot, CERN 7

Electromagnetic CompatibilityEMI sources

Radiated Noise from system is small because at f=40MHz λ=7.5m that is easily shielded by the system faraday cages and enclosures.

Radiated Noise from cables comes mainly from CM noise (far field* from electrically short cables).

EC

S

L

d

ED

ID

ID

S

L

d

IC

IC

Differential Mode: the far fields are opposed and cancel each other

Common Mode: the far fields add up.

The contribution of CM current to EMI is typically more than 3 orders of magnitude stronger than the contribution of the same DM current.

Need to control the sources of CM noise in ATLAS:

Switched power circuits and converters.

Digital circuitry.

CM coupling across cables.

* Far field region starts at a distance d = λ/6, i.e. 1 m at 40 MHz.

Page 8: Overview of the ATLAS Electromagnetic Compatibility Policy G. BLANCHOT CERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland Georges.Blanchot@cern.ch 10th Workshop on Electronics

LECC 2004 G. Blanchot, CERN 8

Electromagnetic Compatibility Near Field in Cable Trays

The near field is mainly contributed by the CM noise.

Coupling across cables happens inside cable trays in the near field region.

The near field dominant component is function of the wave impedance. H field dominates for low impedance loads and decreases at rate 1/d3.

Power circuits, DC/DC converters, 50Ω and 120Ω terminated lines, CANBus.

E field dominates for high impedance loads and decreases at rate 1/d3.Unterminated lines, sensors and TTL signals.

Non dominant field decreases at rate 1/d2.

H fields couple through mutual inductance

E fields couple through stray capacitance

Need to shield the cables to contain the EMI fields and to provide some level of protection against it.

Need to provide separation between cables to reduce their exposure to EMI fields

ICM1

LM

ICM2

V1

CStray

V2

iStray

Page 9: Overview of the ATLAS Electromagnetic Compatibility Policy G. BLANCHOT CERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland Georges.Blanchot@cern.ch 10th Workshop on Electronics

LECC 2004 G. Blanchot, CERN 9

Electromagnetic Compatibility Long Cables

The cables in ATLAS are electrically long: L >> λ.

They behave as antennas for wavelengths above λ/10 (>300 kHz for 100 m cables)

Cables to be modelized as Multiconductor Transmission Lines (MTL).

Current and voltage depend of the per unit length parameters.

Noise and current get amplified or attenuated at the load for given frequencies.

CM turn into DM and vice versa.

Power loads usually are unmatched to their power cable.

Vcm

Multiconductor Transmission

Line

RS(N)

Vn

R0

V1

ICM1

ICM2

ICMn

RL(N)

CMnCMCM

CMn

III

VVV

21

1

CM DM

MTL

Need to measure the system sensibility to CM currents in a systematic way.

Page 10: Overview of the ATLAS Electromagnetic Compatibility Policy G. BLANCHOT CERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland Georges.Blanchot@cern.ch 10th Workshop on Electronics

LECC 2004 G. Blanchot, CERN 10

Electromagnetic Compatibility Common Mode Return Paths

CM currents return to less inductive path: stray capacitances, shields, ground straps.

dL = 1uH/m

ICM

ICM

VCM

Shielded cable

dL = 1uH/m

ICM

ICM

VCM

LVPS

HVPS

CStray

ICM

Shielded cable

Coaxial cable

Same tray

CM currents can return through other cables shields.

CM currents can return through other systems, capacitively coupled, in particular if cables lack of shields to provide the return path.

On large systems, beyond few MHz, the equipotentiallity cannot exist.

Page 11: Overview of the ATLAS Electromagnetic Compatibility Policy G. BLANCHOT CERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland Georges.Blanchot@cern.ch 10th Workshop on Electronics

LECC 2004 G. Blanchot, CERN 11

Electromagnetic Compatibility Routing paths

Systems must be designed so that:

They emit as low CM as possible.

They tolerate CM from couplings.

Cables must be routed so that:

The coupling between systems is minimized. Systems that are sensitive to CM must have their cables away from near magnetic field sources (power): separation of power and data inside a tray.

The circuit loop follows the same path. Cables must contain the return conductor: separation of power and data inside a tray.

Even DC conductors carry high frequency noise, whose emissions must be minimized.

The circuit loops are contained inside a grounded tray. Preferred with covers.

Page 12: Overview of the ATLAS Electromagnetic Compatibility Policy G. BLANCHOT CERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland Georges.Blanchot@cern.ch 10th Workshop on Electronics

LECC 2004 G. Blanchot, CERN 12

Electromagnetic Compatibility Shields

Cables are closely packed inside trays:

Shield required to minimize emissions.

Shield required as a protection against EMI.

Shields in ATLAS: effective up to 10 MHz maximum.

Aluminium foil. Poor mechanical strength , difficult to connect, high DC resistance: addition of drain wire.

Typical transfer impedance = 100 mΩ/m. Good at high frequencies.

Copper braid. Mechanically strong, easy to terminate, sometimes combined with Al foil.

Typical transfer impedance = 10 mΩ/m. Good at low frequencies.

How to connect:

One end to ground: Electric field shielding.

Both ends to ground: Magnetic and electric field shielding.Allowing cuurent to flow in the shield cancels out the H field inside the affected

cable.

Page 13: Overview of the ATLAS Electromagnetic Compatibility Policy G. BLANCHOT CERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland Georges.Blanchot@cern.ch 10th Workshop on Electronics

LECC 2004 G. Blanchot, CERN 13

Electromagnetic Compatibility Compatibility limit

The correlation between CM and

system noise must be evaluated.

SystemS(f)

CM Noise System Noise

Current [mA] at a given frequency

Injected by means of a calibrated injection probe.

RF Generator, injection probe, current probe, EMI

receiver.

Measured by physics DAQ.

System dependent parameter.

System noise limit sets the input CM noise

limit.

Note that the system is also a source of CM noise

sent outwards.

Page 14: Overview of the ATLAS Electromagnetic Compatibility Policy G. BLANCHOT CERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland Georges.Blanchot@cern.ch 10th Workshop on Electronics

LECC 2004 G. Blanchot, CERN 14

Measurements: emissions

ProbePower LinkAC

EMI receiver

Ground plane or on site trays.

CM Noise

LVPS SystemUnderTest

DAQ/DCS10kHz-100MHz

Measurements shall strictly be done with appropriate equipment as described in the policy.

CM noise is contributed by the LVPS and the System under test. Both must configure the ATLAS real setup (no lab devices).

In lab, a ground plane substitutes the structures and trays that provide the CM return path in ATLAS.

150 kHz 30 MHz

dBµV dBµV

1 PKCLRWR

SGL

RBW 9 kHz

MT 100 ms

PREAMP OFFAtt 10 dB

PRN

1 MHz 10 MHz

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1

Marker 1 [T1 ]

55.66 dBµV

4.642000000 MHz

Date: 11.AUG.2004 11:25:10

Peak

dBμV

f

Voltage computed back to CM current

with the current probe calibration

curve. Typical values sit in few tens of μA.

DAQ Link

Example

Page 15: Overview of the ATLAS Electromagnetic Compatibility Policy G. BLANCHOT CERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland Georges.Blanchot@cern.ch 10th Workshop on Electronics

LECC 2004 G. Blanchot, CERN 15

Measurements: Immunity

Probe Power LinkAC

EMI receiver

Ground plane

CM Noise

LVPSSystemUnderTest

DAQ/DCS

RF GeneratorRF Amplifier

Sweep frequency to find worst case peaks.At worst case peaks, modulate amplification up to reach compatibility limit.

DAQ Link

Measurements shall strictly be done with appropriate equipment as described in the policy.

CM noise affects both LVPS and System: both must be representative of the ATLAS setup and appropriate cabling must be used.

In lab, a ground plane substitutes the structures and trays that provide the CM return path in ATLAS.

Injected current is monitored with the

current probe.Typical values up to few tens of mA (up to system

failure). Normalised System Noise vs CM current

0%

50%

100%

150%

200%

250%

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000

1 MHz Injected Common Mode Current [uA]

Sys

tem

No

ise

incr

eae

Example

Page 16: Overview of the ATLAS Electromagnetic Compatibility Policy G. BLANCHOT CERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland Georges.Blanchot@cern.ch 10th Workshop on Electronics

LECC 2004 G. Blanchot, CERN 16

Conclusion

ATLAS EMC Policy:

Quality and risk management issue.

Establishes methods and procedures to insure the systems electromagnetic compatibility in the experiment environment.

Compliance requirements specific to the ATLAS and CERN environments.

Procedures:

Clear description of the setup:

To insuire compliance with safety rules.

To define the valid configuration for EMC measurements.

EMC Measurements: Specific for each system.

Aims to understand how noise couples into a system and affects its performance, within the established compatibility limit.

Guidelines: On cgrounding configurations, coupling modes, cable shields, shield terminations routing paths, test methods, tools.