ows and the hard tasks ahead
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/3/2019 OWS and the Hard Tasks Ahead
1/8
INSURGENT ANTHROPOLOGIES:
OCCUPY WALL STREET AND THE HARD
TASKS AHEAD
By Christopher Carrico
The Occupy Wall Street movement is one of the most significant developments
on the American left to have emerged in years. An important victory has been
won by the fact that the movement has already shifted American public
discourse to now include the recognition of economic inequality as a political
-
8/3/2019 OWS and the Hard Tasks Ahead
2/8
issue. This alone is long overdue, and will most likely be of lasting historical
significance.
We are experiencing, as Andrew Levine wrote in the wake of events in
Madison, Wisconsin earlier this year, the endgame of the Reagan Revolution.The U.S. experienced increasing income and wealth equality from the time of
the Great Depression until the late 1960s. The U.S. capitalist class began, in
the 1970s and even more markedly after the election of Ronald Reagan in
1980, to engage in conscious class warfare for the restoration of capitalist
class power.
The economic crisis that began in 2007 and has continued to the present is the
end result of these three decades of class warfare, and the social movements
of 2011 mark the beginning of a new historical sequence that cannot as yet benamed. Having, at long last, revived the tradition of egalitarian universalism in
American political discourse, the Generation of 2012 must brace itself for the
hard fight ahead against the forces of reaction and entrenched power.
-
8/3/2019 OWS and the Hard Tasks Ahead
3/8
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2008_Top1percentUSA.pngcreated from
http://inequality.org/income-inequality/
The social movements that dominated the late twentieth century were
movements that emphasized diversity, and because of them, in the late
twentieth century there were important victories in the struggle for more just
and equitable societies. The struggle to end racial apartheids, the struggle for
gender equality, the struggle to end the oppression of sexual minorities, and
the struggle for immigrant rights, each made monumental political gains. But
each also quickly reached the limits of what it could achieve within the
horizons of capitalist society, and each has experienced painful attacks and
set-backs in the wake of 9/11 and in the wake of economic crisis.
The egalitarian universalism of the OWS discourse (We are the 99%)contains within it the possibility of bringing into sharp focus the precise
nature of the ways in which capitalism presents barriers to the achievement
of social justice. The precise ways in which capitalist democracy is an
oxymoron, and real democracy can only be achieved when capital is overcome
as a barrier (This is what democracy looks like.)
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2008_Top1percentUSA.pnghttp://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2008_Top1percentUSA.pnghttp://inequality.org/income-inequality/http://inequality.org/income-inequality/http://inequality.org/income-inequality/http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2008_Top1percentUSA.png -
8/3/2019 OWS and the Hard Tasks Ahead
4/8
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Occupy_Wall_Street_Together.jpg
Occupy Wall Street has identified exactly the right target at a moment when
there is widespread recognition and agreement about Wall Street as the
perpetrator of a great crime, as well as agreement that Wall Street has an
inordinate amount of control over the economic decisions that come out of
Washington both from Republicans and from Democrats.
OWS has used publicity strategies that should make Madison Avenue envious.
Even in the absence of much early coverage from mainstream news, the
movement used social networking media to mobilize a national and an
international movement, with tens of thousands taking to the streets in placesremote from Wall Street, but integrated into a world experiencing common
conditions as a result of their common subjection to the regime of capital.
They have slept on the ground and camped in tents in the public spaces and
parks around the world, and have revitalized a space for public protest after a
long era of the privatization of public space, and the systematic post- 9/11
assault on civil liberties such as the right to peaceable assembly. They have
established an ongoing experiment in direct democracy in the form of their
General Assemblies self-organized decision-making bodies that bear a familyresemblance to those of the Paris Commune.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Occupy_Wall_Street_Together.jpghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Occupy_Wall_Street_Together.jpghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Occupy_Wall_Street_Together.jpg -
8/3/2019 OWS and the Hard Tasks Ahead
5/8
https://reader009.{domain}/reader009/html5/0509/5af299a5d7e51/5af
Eight weeks into an occupation of Zuccotti Park, however, it is likely that the
movements hardest tasks are still ahead. Here it seems that some of the
questions that Okla Elliott asked here in March of the movement in Wisconsinare again relevant in the case of OWS. First among these was Protests are
good for visibility, but what are our next or concurrent moves?
Occupying Zuccotti Park is not the same as occupying Wall Street. OWS has
not occupied The New York Stock Exchange, or the board rooms of the banks
and the brokerage firms. The occupation of the Park itself is a minor
inconvenience for capital, easy to ignore for people who find it easy to ignore
the connection between their actions and genocide and planetary ecological
collapse.
Occupying a park is also not the same as occupying a city, or seizing control of
the means of production, or capturing state power. Occupying Zuccotti Park is
not capable of achieving any of these things, but what the movement is
capable of being is a new model for organizing actions thatcouldachieve
broader political and economic goals.
Let me end by making brief comment on four different kinds of actions that
are concurrent with or outgrowths of the Occupy Wall Street movement, threeof which are economic in nature, and one that consciously aims at affecting
the political process.
The first of these economic actions is one that has had mainly a symbolic
value, but it also has the value of negative example as one way that it is not
possible to change the regime of finance capital: Bank Transfer Day.
http://www.jessibautista.com/ows/ows111013-008.jpghttp://www.jessibautista.com/ows/ows111013-008.jpghttp://www.jessibautista.com/ows/ows111013-008.jpg -
8/3/2019 OWS and the Hard Tasks Ahead
6/8
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bank_Transfer_Day_poster..jpg
Not surprisingly, it was Doug Henwood who has been the quickest and
clearest in pointing out the limitations to idea behind Bank Transfer Day and
similar actions. I will not repeat his arguments; you can read about them here(http://lbo-news.com/2011/11/08/moving-money-revisited/ ) and here
(http://lbo-news.com/2011/11/09/more-on-credit-unions/). But I will
repeat his main conclusion:
Getting banks under control is a matter of politics, not individual
portfolio allocation decisions. Sure, you may get friendlier service
and lower fees from a credit unionbut youre not really doing
anything politically transformative by moving the money. Move
your money and its still money.
The second of the economic actions that I would like to mention is one
that has more of a chance of having a transformative effect: the
participation of the trade unions in the Occupy movement.
In the last weeks of 2010, student strikes in London mobilized quickly
and dramatically to express the collective rage that youth felt towards
the policies of the Conservative-Liberal coalition government. While
celebrating the strengths of the student movement, Alex Callinicos(http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/dec/26/student-
protests-laurie-penny) also noted that the students lack the collective
economic strength that, for all the setbacks it has suffered, the trade
union movement still possesses. The pressing problem for the London
student demonstrations was how to bring together the fighting spirit
and imagination of the students and the collective power of organised
workers.
It is one of the strengths of the Occupy Wall Street movement that, like
the movement in Wisconsin, it has involved the participation of the
labor unions from the beginning. More is needed, however, than union
activists and rank-and-file members joining the Occupy demonstrations,
as they would join fellow workers in their picket lines. What is needed is
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bank_Transfer_Day_poster..jpghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bank_Transfer_Day_poster..jpghttp://lbo-news.com/2011/11/08/moving-money-revisited/http://lbo-news.com/2011/11/08/moving-money-revisited/http://lbo-news.com/2011/11/09/more-on-credit-unions/http://lbo-news.com/2011/11/09/more-on-credit-unions/http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/dec/26/student-protests-laurie-pennyhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/dec/26/student-protests-laurie-pennyhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/dec/26/student-protests-laurie-pennyhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/dec/26/student-protests-laurie-pennyhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/dec/26/student-protests-laurie-pennyhttp://lbo-news.com/2011/11/09/more-on-credit-unions/http://lbo-news.com/2011/11/08/moving-money-revisited/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bank_Transfer_Day_poster..jpg -
8/3/2019 OWS and the Hard Tasks Ahead
7/8
the third economic action, one that so far has only been tried in a limited
way in a one day action in the Occupy Oakland protests: the General
Strike. This still remains the weapon par excellence of the trade union
movement.
One can see movements towards more substantive trade union actions
in solidarity with OWS, hopefully ones that will escalate. Next week the
AFL-CIO, the Service Employees International Union and the Laborers
International Union of North America will partner with Occupy Wall
Street for a Day of Action on Thursday. The actions are not radical
actions like a General Strike, however. They are mainly actions that are
supposed to lend support to Democratic Party attempts to pass job
stimulus bills.Each of these three economic actions has its own limits, and the limits of
each points to the fact that it is political action that will ultimately make
economic transformation a possibility. While OWS has focused its
attention on Wall Street, as economics is clearly the reason for the
worlds current state of crisis, it also has to be recognized that the
solution to this impasse will be a political solution.
OWS has also been cautious about appealing to the political
establishment to address specific demands because progressives have
learned some hard lessons about the ways in which social movements
can be co-opted, and the radical nature of their demands sometimes
diluted beyond recognition by politicians and the established political
parties.
What we should not lose sight of in resisting this co-optation is that in
the end real changes can only be achieved by this movement if it makes
a conscious attempt to affect the political process in some way. Here wecan point to the encouraging example of the NYC March To DC, a
contingent of OWS in New York that left Zuccotti Park on November 9th
on a walking march south, and aims to reach Washington, DC on
November 23rd to join Occupy DC in protesting the continuation of the
Bush era tax cuts.
-
8/3/2019 OWS and the Hard Tasks Ahead
8/8
These actions are a long way from actions that could achieve goals of
epoch-making proportions, like bringing capital under collective
communal control, but they are a clear indication that the OWS
experiment in direct democracy is working. The actions that have
grown out of the Occupy Wall Street are moving in the right direction.
Regardless of the immediate success or failure of the actions around
OWS, the political enthusiasm that the movement has generated has
changed the terrain of left politics in the United States, in ways that are
likely to have implications for years to come.