pacific northwest aquatic monitoring partnership (pnamp)
DESCRIPTION
Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership (PNAMP). A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest. Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership. Purpose is to achieve more robust and - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
A forum for coordinating A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal state, federal, and tribal
aquatic monitoring programs aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwestin the Pacific Northwest
Pacific NorthwestPacific NorthwestAquatic Aquatic
Monitoring Monitoring PartnershipPartnership(PNAMP)(PNAMP)
Purpose is to achieve more robust andPurpose is to achieve more robust and
cost-effective information through cost-effective information through improved coordination and improved coordination and
compatibilitycompatibility
Allow shared resources and data Allow shared resources and data across organizationsacross organizations
Provide increased scientific Provide increased scientific credibility, cost-effective use of credibility, cost-effective use of limited funds, and greater limited funds, and greater accountability to stakeholdersaccountability to stakeholders
Pacific Northwest Aquatic
Monitoring Partnership
PNAMP GoalsPNAMP Goals
Technical forum to develop, Technical forum to develop, coordinate and inform M&E programscoordinate and inform M&E programs
Forum and process for Forum and process for communication to decision makerscommunication to decision makers
Clearing house for design, protocols, Clearing house for design, protocols, and data management and data management
Process to establish Process to establish landscape/ecosystem metricslandscape/ecosystem metrics
Pacific Northwest Aquatic
Monitoring Partnership
PNAMP Partners June 2005PNAMP Partners June 2005BPA
CDFGCBFWACRITFC
Colville TribesEPA
NOAA Fisheries NWIFCNPCCOWEB
PSMFCACOEBLMUSBRUSFSUSGS
WA ECYWA GSROWA SRFB
Pacific Northwest Aquatic
Monitoring Partnership
Structure of PNAMPStructure of PNAMP Watershed condition Watershed condition monitoringmonitoring
Fish population monitoringFish population monitoring
Project effectiveness Project effectiveness monitoringmonitoring
Data management Data management
Estuary monitoringEstuary monitoring
Other topics as interest Other topics as interest meritsmerits
Pacific Northwest Aquatic
Monitoring Partnership
PNAMP 2005 ProgressPNAMP 2005 Progress Charter finalized and signed by 19 state, Charter finalized and signed by 19 state,
tribal, federal, and regional entitiestribal, federal, and regional entities Strategy CompleteStrategy Complete
Identify key management questionsIdentify key management questions Develop standardized metrics and protocolsDevelop standardized metrics and protocols Identify regional efforts that are key Identify regional efforts that are key
components of a monitoring networkcomponents of a monitoring network 2005 Workplan2005 Workplan
Pacific Northwest Aquatic
Monitoring Partnership
PNAMP 2005 ProgressPNAMP 2005 Progress
Protocol ComparisonsProtocol Comparisons WatershedWatershed “Side-by-side Test” “Side-by-side Test”
underway Summer 2005; underway Summer 2005; FishFish Protocol Protocol document under reviewdocument under review
Universal Survey DesignUniversal Survey Design IMW draft planIMW draft plan Regional data dictionaryRegional data dictionary
Pacific Northwest Aquatic
Monitoring Partnership
PNAMP 2006 PlanningPNAMP 2006 Planning
2006 Workplan under development2006 Workplan under development Cross-cut tasks identified at 2005 Cross-cut tasks identified at 2005
PNAMP Steering Committee RetreatPNAMP Steering Committee Retreat
Pacific Northwest Aquatic
Monitoring Partnership
PNAMP 2006 Cross-cut PNAMP 2006 Cross-cut taskstasks
Protocol Protocol standardization/coordinationstandardization/coordination InventoryInventory of monitoring activities of monitoring activities Universal Universal Survey DesignSurvey Design for status for status
monitoringmonitoring Data ManagementData Management (including data (including data
sharing agreements)sharing agreements) High-level High-level IndicatorsIndicators Facilitate regional Facilitate regional NetworkingNetworking
Pacific Northwest Aquatic
Monitoring Partnership
Next StepsNext Steps
Increase involvement in technical Increase involvement in technical workgroupsworkgroups
Increase cross-workgroup interactionIncrease cross-workgroup interaction
Finalize 2006 WorkplanFinalize 2006 Workplan
Pacific Northwest Aquatic
Monitoring Partnership
Example of Cross Cutting Example of Cross Cutting Issue: High-level IndicatorsIssue: High-level Indicators
Pacific Northwest Aquatic
Monitoring Partnership
What are they and how do they work?What are they and how do they work?
Why are they important?Why are they important?
How have they been applied before in How have they been applied before in the region?the region?
How will PNAMP develop and apply How will PNAMP develop and apply them?them?
High-level IndicatorsHigh-level Indicators
What are they and how do they work?What are they and how do they work? Similar needs, different approaches:Similar needs, different approaches:
State of Salmon Report – WashingtonState of Salmon Report – Washington Environmental Indicators for the Oregon Plan Environmental Indicators for the Oregon Plan
for Salmon and Watersheds – Oregonfor Salmon and Watersheds – Oregon Initiative to Develop Provincial Scale Initiative to Develop Provincial Scale
Objectives - NPCCObjectives - NPCC
Pacific Northwest Aquatic
Monitoring Partnership
High-level IndicatorsHigh-level Indicators
Why are they important?Why are they important?
Identify key attributes to monitorIdentify key attributes to monitor
Establish basis for evaluation at Establish basis for evaluation at programmatic scaleprogrammatic scale
Facilitates reporting to diverse Facilitates reporting to diverse constituenciesconstituencies
Pacific Northwest Aquatic
Monitoring Partnership
High-level IndicatorsHigh-level Indicators
How have they been applied before in the How have they been applied before in the region?region?
Compare and contrast the approaches & Compare and contrast the approaches & experiences of Washington and Oregon experiences of Washington and Oregon
Discuss the implications of these Discuss the implications of these experiences for future efforts experiences for future efforts
Pacific Northwest Aquatic
Monitoring Partnership
High-level IndicatorsHigh-level Indicators
How will PNAMP develop and apply them?How will PNAMP develop and apply them?
PNAMP Subcommittee formed to facilitate PNAMP Subcommittee formed to facilitate the identification of indicators appropriate the identification of indicators appropriate and acceptable for regional useand acceptable for regional use
Subcommittee will develop white paper Subcommittee will develop white paper with recommendations and report back to with recommendations and report back to the Steering Committeethe Steering Committee
Pacific Northwest Aquatic
Monitoring Partnership
For more information, see For more information, see
www.reo.gov/PNAMPwww.reo.gov/PNAMP
Pacific Northwest Aquatic
Monitoring Partnership
Supplemental SlidesSupplemental Slides
Pacific Northwest Aquatic
Monitoring Partnership
Watershed Condition Watershed Condition MonitoringMonitoring
Protocol Comparison: “Side-by-side Protocol Comparison: “Side-by-side Test” underway Summer 2005Test” underway Summer 2005
Universal Survey Design: under Universal Survey Design: under consideration for use by regional consideration for use by regional monitoring programsmonitoring programs
Pacific Northwest Aquatic
Monitoring Partnership
Fish Population Monitoring Fish Population Monitoring
Protocol comparison publication: Protocol comparison publication: facilitate review of Johnson facilitate review of Johnson et al.et al.
Identify regional FPM RME needs and Identify regional FPM RME needs and facilitate interaction with existing facilitate interaction with existing groups and programs (e.g. CSMEP; groups and programs (e.g. CSMEP; CRB pilot studies) CRB pilot studies)
Field protocol comparison testsField protocol comparison tests
Pacific Northwest Aquatic
Monitoring Partnership
Effectiveness Monitoring Effectiveness Monitoring WorkgroupWorkgroup
Intensively monitored watershed Intensively monitored watershed (IMW) network(IMW) network
Regional data dictionary for aquatic Regional data dictionary for aquatic monitoring attributes monitoring attributes
Tools (including high level indicators) Tools (including high level indicators) for reporting on effectiveness of for reporting on effectiveness of projectsprojects
Common sampling protocols for Common sampling protocols for testing effectiveness of projectstesting effectiveness of projects
Pacific Northwest Aquatic
Monitoring Partnership
Data ManagementData Management
Regional coordination workshops Regional coordination workshops hosted by the NED, PNW RGIC, and hosted by the NED, PNW RGIC, and others (e.g. regional QA/QC, regional others (e.g. regional QA/QC, regional spatial definitions, data networking, spatial definitions, data networking, project management data)project management data)
Data Management Coordination Plan, Data Management Coordination Plan, including interaction with existiincluding interaction with existing ng entities, e.g. NED, IRICCentities, e.g. NED, IRICC
Pacific Northwest Aquatic
Monitoring Partnership