page 1© crown copyright 2004 meteorological inputs groundwater workshop, birmingham murray dale,...
TRANSCRIPT
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 1
Meteorological Inputs
Groundwater Workshop, BirminghamMurray Dale, 4/11/04
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 2
Presentation Content
Rainfall Data
MORECS & MOSES
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 3
Rain Gauge Network
Real time Daily - 200 Real time Hourly - 175 (1000 planned) Slow time Daily - 3500 Slow time hourly - 200
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 4
Quality Control
QA team based in Edinburgh, lead by Ross Melville and Derek Ogle
Brochure availableConforms to British Standard BS7834 (1996) – Guide to the acquisition and management of meteorological precipitation data (establishing a network, user requirement, siting, data management, QA…)
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 5
UK Radar Coverage
1 km coverage(50 km range)
2 km coverage(100 km range)
5 km coverage(250 km range)
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 6
Rain gauge location(and 1km storm accumulation)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 mm
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 7
1km radar accuracy (1 of 3)
Woodford 5-minute rainfall data on 31/12/03, aggregated to 15-minute totals
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
21:00:00 21:15:00 21:30:00 21:45:00 22:00:00 22:15:00 22:30:00 22:45:00 23:00:00 23:15:00 23:30:00 23:45:00 00:00:00
Ra
infa
ll (
mm
)
raingauge
Hameldon Hill radar
Rainfall totals:Radar: 14.5mmRaingauge: 12.2mm
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 8
1km radar accuracy (2 of 3)
Shawbury 5-minute rainfall data on 28/8/03, aggregated to 15-minute totals
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
07:3
008
:00
08:3
009
:00
09:3
010
:00
10:3
011
:00
11:3
012
:00
12:3
013
:00
13:3
014
:00
14:3
015
:00
15:3
016
:00
16:3
017
:00
17:3
018
:00
Rai
nfa
ll (m
m)
Raingauge
Clee Hill radar
Rainfall total:Radar: 12.1mmRaingauge: 12.6mm
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 9
1km radar accuracy (3 of 3)
Dunkeswell 5-minute rainfall data on 1/12/03, aggregated to 15-minute totals
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
1.40
1.60
1.80
09:0
0:00
09:1
5:00
09:3
0:00
09:4
5:00
10:0
0:00
10:1
5:00
10:3
0:00
10:4
5:00
11:0
0:00
11:1
5:00
11:3
0:00
11:4
5:00
12:0
0:00
12:1
5:00
12:3
0:00
12:4
5:00
13:0
0:00
13:1
5:00
13:3
0:00
13:4
5:00
14:0
0:00
14:1
5:00
14:3
0:00
14:4
5:00
15:0
0:00
15:1
5:00
15:3
0:00
15:4
5:00
16:0
0:00
16:1
5:00
16:3
0:00
16:4
5:00
17:0
0:00
Rai
nfa
ll (m
m)
raingauge
Cobbacombe radar
Rainfall totals:Radar: 23.6mmRaingauge: 15.8mm
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 10
Radar / Gauge data in Urban Drainage Modelling
RainObs.
...ay 2 f inal>Wet Day 2...ROD_NEC_Ev ent02
Rainf all
Depth (mm)
6.000
Peak (mm/hr)
6.000
Av erage(mm/hr)
0.744
Depth (m)
Min
0.2800.2190.232
Max
1.4360.5910.652
Flow (m3/s)
Min
0.0180.0210.028
Max
0.3550.2690.305
Volume (m3)
3831.9003361.2773943.132
Velocity (m/s)
Min
0.1500.3670.417
Max
1.5001.2461.403
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 11
MORECS
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 12
MOSES
Soil Moisture data derived from radar Advanced scientific representation of
processes 5km spatial resolution Hourly updated Provides information on soil moisture status
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 13
MOSES
Soil moisture deficit from MOSES
Darcian flow of soil moisture
Deep drainage
Surface runoff
Evaporation frombare soil, trees,grass, crops,wet canopies etc.
Rain,Snow Radiation
Rootsextractwater
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 14
Moses detail reference on-line
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/research/nwp/publications/papers/technical_reports/fr.html
Report # 428
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 15
MOSES-PDM – MORECS Inter-comparison
Project jointly funded by the EA and Met OfficeCompared two extreme hydrological events
Drought of 1975-76 and floods of 2000-01For 4 contrasting MORECS squares24 month periods investigated
Inter-comparison contrasted with findings from available literature
Study concluded that MOSES-PDM better represents processes of evaporation, drainage and soil moisture than MORECS
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 16
A comparison of SMD for grass from MORECS, MOSES-PDM and observations at one site from 1995-1997. (Redrawn from Blyth
(2002))
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
Jan-9
5
Mar-9
5
May-
95
Jul-9
5
Sep-95
Nov-95
Jan-9
6
Mar-9
6
May-
96
Jul-9
6
Sep-96
Nov-96
Jan-9
7
Mar-9
7
May-
97
Jul-9
7
Sep-97
Nov-97
Date
SM
D (
mm
)
MORECS MOSES-PDM OBSERVATIONS
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 17
Variable Difference from comparison
Period Support from literature review?
Possible causes
PE/AE MX>MS Winter MOSES canopy resistance, soil heat flux
Annual √
PE MX>MS Very dry summer MOSES canopy resistance
AE MX=0, MS>0 Very dry summer √ Fixed available water in MORECS, MOSES calculates water transfer in dry soil
EP MX>MS Autumn √ In MOSES the gradual wetting of the lowest soil layer gives a slower onset of drainage
EP MX<MS Summer, annual √ MOSES has less AE and also has
drainage when SMD>0
SMD MX>MS Spring √ MORECS has more AE
MOSES / MORECS Comparison Summary
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 18
Inter-comparison
MORECS uses the science and concepts of the late 1970s; the update in 1995 introduced more realistic soils data, but did nothing to change the basic science. MOSES includes more recent developments in evaporation and soils modelling including: Canopy resistance to moisture transfer which interacts with
weather Soil heat flux modelling Soil moisture movement modelling, snowmelt, surface runoff 5 km soils and land use, but only 1 farm crop type PDM represents a range of soil properties to represent soil
moisture variability and runoffThis report has shown the benefits of these
improvements
© Crown copyright 2004 Page 19
Summary
Raingauge network details, planned real-time gauge increase, QC obligations
Radar – more appropriate for spatial rainfall than point source data (gauges)
MORECS – 1970s model, modifications in 1990s
MOSES – higher resolution (time and space), better representation of reality