páginas desderadio electronics july 1985-3
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/18/2019 Páginas DesdeRadio Electronics July 1985-3
1/2
ULTR SONI
PEST·REPELLERS
FIG. SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM of a
popular
ultrasonic pest repeller. Despite its
simplicity
, the device
was remarkable effec tive.
c
C
livering 16-20 watts in the ultrasonic re
gion and special high-power tweeters.
Certainly that little plastic box didn't con
tain a 20-watt power amplifier or high
power tweeters . Also, a 16-20-watt power
amplifier drawing only 4 watts from a
supply would be about as close to per-
R
4
C6
3.3K
Z
3
15K
ICl
555
=
C1
J .
OO
I
C5
.01
R6 R3
47rl 4.7K
R8
fi
10K
R4
rv{ jj
10K
I
ZV
AC
@Z65
rnA
R5
I
47rl
LED1
+
C3
+
C4
1 lF 1000/lF
16V 16V
R7
' SEETEXT
6.8K
Now that the pest repeller had done its
work, I began to speculate on its circuit.
An early article on the use of ultrasonics
in insect and rodent control ( Electronic
Pest Control by LymanGreenlee, Pop-
ular lectron ics July 1972) indicated that
the repeller needed a power amplifier de-
The claims made for those ultrasonic pest repellers seem
fantastic at first
gl nce but
they really work. In this article,
we ll find out what makes those devices tick .
RO ERT
S OTT
OVER
T H E
YEARS
, T
HERE
H AV E
BEEN
many art icles published that proclaimed
that ultrasonics, either in the form of
pulsesor a sweep signal, can be used as an
effective insect and rodent repellent.
I' ve
always been skeptical of such claims and
placed them in the same category with
those electronic devices claimed to pre
vent swa llows from ne stin g on th e
court house roof and prevent pigeons from
defiling the Stonewall Jackson statue on
the town square. Nevertheless , I filed
those articles away for investigation
sometime in the future.
Last summer, my hunting and fishing
club took possession of a farmhouse that
had been abruptly abandoned about a year
ago. The house was absolutely overrun
with mice and roaches that were bold
enoughto scamper about in full daylight.
We were at a loss as to how to get rid of
them.
Ultrasonic pest repellents had begun to
appear in mail-order advert ising and our
club president suggested that we try one.
Those devices, accordingto the literature,
generate a signal that sweeps over a fre
quency range of approximately 22 kHz to
65 kl-lz, develop sound pressures ranging
from 5 to 152 db , and repel pests in
areas of 2500 to 3500 square feel, Pow
er
consumption is typically 2 to 4 watts.
Prices range from 30 .00 to 70.00, plus
shipping. .
At first, I scoffed at the suggestion that
we purchase an ultransonic pest repeller,
but agreed to try one since theywere avail
ablefo r a 30-day trial and full refund. The
30.00 model was available from several
sources under name s that include Pest
Control, Pest-Elim 1500, and Westronix.
Weordered one and it came within a few
days . It was shipped in a plain unmarked
carto n and weweresurprised to findthat it
did not carry a trade name or model
number. Weinstalled in the clubhouse.
Within twoweeks, mice and roaches were
nowhere to be seen--even when lights
were suddenly turned on in a dark room.
Now, we consider the clubhouse com
pletely free of pests. Not a sign of them:
even in the darkest corners and crannies.
61
-
8/18/2019 Páginas DesdeRadio Electronics July 1985-3
2/2
on the line from the power supply modu
la te s t he ult rason ic freque nc y. Two
Darlington-connected NPN transistors
provide some power amplification and
drive for the speaker.
Circuit for experimenters
If you wan t to experiment with the
effects of continuous or pulsed high-fre
quency signals , ' the circuit in Fig. 3 is
idea l: it can provide either a con tinuous or
pulsed output. It was developed by Sig
netics and described in
Electronic Prod-
ucts Magazine .
Looking at the circ uit. one 555 timer,
IC2, generates the ultrasonic squarewave
at a recommended 20 kHz . That signal
can be supplied continuously or pulsed on
and off by a second 555. ICI.
Exp erimenting wi th frequency and
dutycycle is easy. Duty cycle is the on
time compa red to the total period, and can
be set from slightly above 50lk to almost
1009'c. In the asta ble mult ivibrator circuit ,
the duty cycle is set by the timing re
sistors . RTI and R
T
2. and is equal to RTI
(R
T2
/R
T
I) 2R
r
. .
The on time is close to 100 lk when RTI
is chosen to be as small as practical while
limiting the current through the discharge
transistor to the maximum spec ified in the
data sheet. (The discharge transistor.
which is on-board the 555 , is an open
collector NPN device with the collector
going to pin 7 and the emitter to ground at
pin I. The maximum current through it
varies with differe nt manufacturers so you
should check the maker's data sheet' to be
sure .)
If you want a duty cycle of less than
509c
connect a general-purpose silicon
diod e such as the IN914 across R
T
2 with
its anode at pin 7 and cathode at pin 6.
That effectively shorts R
T2
while timing
capacitor C
T
is charging, and the duty
cyc le is now (R
T2
/R
T
l) R
T2
and it can
be varied from around 0 to nearly 1009c.
The frequency of the squarewave gener
ator can be found from 1.44/C
T
(R
T
I
2R
T2
), where resistance is in megohms
and capaci tance in microfarads.
If you want to vary the duty cycle of the
osci lla tor while keeping the frequency
cons tant , use the basic circuit shown in
Fig . 4 .
In that circuit , a single potentiometer is
used for the two timing resistors . In that
scheme it is possib le to set the value of
one of the two timing resistors to zero.
As that is undesirable, two resistors , RI
and R2, have been added to set minimum
values for those timing resistors.
Use the basic circuit shown in Fig. 5
when you want to vary frequency while
keeping the duty cycle constant at approx
imately 50 .The variable element used
in that circuit, R, a and
b, is a two
gang linear potentiometer. Note that the
value of the two variable elements are
continued on page 82
frequency. That sweep of from 25 kHz to
65 kHz issurpr ising ly clo se to the 22-65
kHz range specified in the ads. The speak
er is a 2 inch piezoe lectric tweete r.
How the French do it
The circuit in Fig . 2 is a pest repe ller
described in the French electronics maga
zine , Le Haw Parleur. In the art icle, the
author claims that frequencies in the range
of 20 to 40 kHz cause highly uncomforta
ble cavities to form in brain fluids and
bloodvesse ls of mice and insects , causing
them to beat a hasty retreat. Rad iated
power levels can be as low as y watt .
Looki ng more closely at the circ uit, a
quad two-input NAND gate is connected as
multi vibrator operating at around40 kHz.
With the
minimum
of filtering used in the
power supply, a residual 120-Hz sawtooth
Sl
CONTINUOUS
+V
CC
R
T2
3
ICI
PULS EO
47K
555
6
1
R
T2
47K
6
C
T
C3
1 °·1
J
CT
Rl
lOOK
14
13
11
R3
12
22K
9
8
10
ICI
C
Cl
CD4
I 560pF
560pF
2
6
4
5
T1
6.3V
1
1-12A
0
2
TO
lOOK
111VAC
a
FIG. 3- THISCIRCUITIS ideal for experimenting with ultrasonic signals. It can supply either a pulsed
or continuous output.
petual motion as one can come. Thus , I
couldn't wait to pry open the repe ller 's
x x plastic case and see
wha t made it tick .
Figure I is the circ uit of the device we
tested .' We were quite surprised to find
that the circu it was simply a 555 timer IC
connected as a squarewave generator. Its
base frequenc y is approximately 45 kHz,
as determined by the values of Rl , R2,
and C l .
The 45 -kH z carrier
is frequ ency
modulated by a modified trapizoidal volt
age waveform app lied to pin 5 of the 555
time r. Tha t modulating voltage is de
veloped by a network consisting of C2 ,
R3, and R4 connec ted across one leg of
the bridge rectifier. A check with an os
cilloscope showe d a sweep of approx
imately 20 kHz on eac h side of the base
FIG.
THIS
PEST REPELLER of French design is built around a CD4 quad NANO gate. The
schematic diagram is shown in a; a block diagram of the IC is shown in b .