páginas desderadio electronics july 1985-3

Upload: anonymous-r9lpd68fta

Post on 07-Jul-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/18/2019 Páginas DesdeRadio Electronics July 1985-3

    1/2

    ULTR SONI

    PEST·REPELLERS

    FIG.   SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM of a

    popular

    ultrasonic pest repeller. Despite its

    simplicity

    , the device

    was remarkable effec tive.

    c

    C

    livering 16-20 watts in the ultrasonic re

    gion and special high-power tweeters.

    Certainly that little plastic box didn't con

    tain a 20-watt power amplifier or high

    power tweeters . Also, a 16-20-watt power

    amplifier drawing only 4 watts from a

    supply would be about as close to per-

    R

    4

    C6

    3.3K

    Z

    3

    15K

    ICl

    555

     =

    C1

    J .

    OO

    I

    C5

    .01

    R6 R3

    47rl 4.7K

     

    R8

    fi

    10K

    R4

     rv{ jj

    10K

     

    I

    ZV

    AC

    @Z65

    rnA

    R5

    I

    47rl

    LED1

    +

    C3

    +

    C4

    1 lF 1000/lF

     

    16V 16V

    R7

    ' SEETEXT

     

    6.8K

    Now that the pest repeller had done its

    work, I began to speculate on its circuit.

    An early article on the use of ultrasonics

    in insect and rodent control ( Electronic

    Pest Control by LymanGreenlee, Pop-

    ular lectron ics July 1972) indicated that

    the repeller needed a power amplifier de-

    The claims made for those ultrasonic pest repellers seem

    fantastic at first

    gl nce but

    they really work. In this article,

    we ll find out what makes those devices   tick .

    RO ERT

     

    S OTT

    OVER

    T H E

    YEARS

    , T

    HERE

    H AV E

    BEEN

    many art icles published that proclaimed

    that ultrasonics, either in the form of

    pulsesor a sweep signal, can be used as an

    effective insect and rodent repellent.

    I' ve

    always been skeptical of such claims and

    placed them in the same category with

    those electronic devices claimed to pre

    vent swa llows from ne stin g on th e

    court house roof and prevent pigeons from

    defiling the Stonewall Jackson statue on

    the town square. Nevertheless , I filed

    those articles away for investigation

    sometime in the future.

    Last summer, my hunting and fishing

    club took possession of a farmhouse that

    had been abruptly abandoned about a year

    ago. The house was absolutely overrun

    with mice and roaches that were bold

    enoughto scamper about in full daylight.

    We were at a loss as to how to get rid of

    them.

    Ultrasonic pest repellents had begun to

    appear in mail-order advert ising and our

    club president suggested that we try one.

    Those devices, accordingto the literature,

    generate a signal that sweeps over a fre

    quency range of approximately 22 kHz to

    65 kl-lz, develop sound pressures ranging

    from   5 to 152 db , and repel pests in

    areas of 2500 to 3500 square feel, Pow

    er

    consumption is typically 2 to 4 watts.

    Prices range from 30 .00 to 70.00, plus

    shipping. .

    At first, I scoffed at the suggestion that

    we purchase an ultransonic pest repeller,

    but agreed to try one since theywere avail

    ablefo r a 30-day trial and full refund. The

     30.00 model was available from several

    sources under name s that include Pest

    Control, Pest-Elim 1500, and Westronix.

    Weordered one and it came within a few

    days . It was shipped in a plain unmarked

    carto n and weweresurprised to findthat it

    did not carry a trade name or model

    number. Weinstalled in the clubhouse.

    Within twoweeks, mice and roaches were

    nowhere to be seen--even when lights

    were suddenly turned on in a dark room.

    Now, we consider the clubhouse com

    pletely free of pests. Not a sign of them:

    even in the darkest corners and crannies.

    61

  • 8/18/2019 Páginas DesdeRadio Electronics July 1985-3

    2/2

    on the line from the power supply modu

    la te s t he ult rason ic freque nc y. Two

    Darlington-connected NPN transistors

    provide some power amplification and

    drive for the speaker.

    Circuit for experimenters

    If you wan t to experiment with the

    effects of continuous or pulsed high-fre

    quency signals , ' the circuit in Fig. 3 is

    idea l: it can provide either a con tinuous or

    pulsed output. It was developed by Sig

    netics and described in

    Electronic Prod-

    ucts Magazine .

    Looking at the circ uit. one 555 timer,

    IC2, generates the ultrasonic squarewave

    at a recommended 20 kHz . That signal

    can be supplied continuously or pulsed on

    and off by a second 555. ICI.

    Exp erimenting wi th frequency and

    dutycycle is easy. Duty cycle is the  on 

    time compa red to the total period, and can

    be set from slightly above 50lk to almost

    1009'c. In the asta ble mult ivibrator circuit ,

    the duty cycle is set by the timing re

    sistors . RTI and R

    T

    2. and is equal to RTI

      (R

    T2

    /R

    T

    I)   2R

    r

    . .

    The on time is close to 100 lk when RTI

    is chosen to be as small as practical while

    limiting the current through the discharge

    transistor to the maximum spec ified in the

    data sheet. (The discharge transistor.

    which is on-board the 555 , is an open

    collector NPN device with the collector

    going to pin 7 and the emitter to ground at

    pin I. The maximum current through it

    varies with differe nt manufacturers so you

    should check the maker's data sheet' to be

    sure .)

    If you want a duty cycle of less than

    509c 

    connect a general-purpose silicon

    diod e such as the IN914 across R

    T

    2 with

    its anode at pin 7 and cathode at pin 6.

    That effectively shorts R

    T2

    while timing

    capacitor C

    T

    is charging, and the duty

    cyc le is now (R

    T2

    /R

    T

    l)   R

    T2

    and it can

    be varied from around 0 to nearly 1009c.

    The frequency of the squarewave gener

    ator can be found from 1.44/C

    T

    (R

    T

    I

     

    2R

    T2

    ), where resistance is in megohms

    and capaci tance in microfarads.

    If you want to vary the duty cycle of the

    osci lla tor while keeping the frequency

    cons tant , use the basic circuit shown in

    Fig . 4 .

    In that circuit , a single potentiometer is

    used for the two timing resistors . In that

    scheme it is possib le to set the value of

    one of the two  timing resistors to zero.

    As that is undesirable, two resistors , RI

    and R2, have been added to set minimum

    values for those timing resistors.

    Use the basic circuit shown in Fig. 5

    when you want to vary frequency while

    keeping the duty cycle constant at approx

    imately 50  .The variable element used

    in that circuit, R, a and

     

    b, is a two

    gang linear potentiometer. Note that the

    value of the two variable elements are

    continued on page 82

    frequency. That sweep of from 25 kHz to

    65 kHz issurpr ising ly clo se to the 22-65

    kHz range specified in the ads. The speak

    er is a 2 inch piezoe lectric tweete r.

    How the French do it

    The circuit in Fig . 2 is a pest repe ller

    described in the French electronics maga

    zine , Le Haw Parleur. In the art icle, the

    author claims that frequencies in the range

    of 20 to 40 kHz cause highly uncomforta

    ble cavities to form in brain fluids and

    bloodvesse ls of mice and insects , causing

    them to beat a hasty retreat. Rad iated

    power levels can be as low as y watt .

    Looki ng more closely at the circ uit, a

    quad two-input NAND gate is connected as

    multi vibrator operating at around40 kHz.

    With the

    minimum

    of filtering used in the

    power supply, a residual 120-Hz sawtooth

    Sl

    CONTINUOUS

    +V

    CC

    R

    T2

    3

    ICI

    PULS EO

    47K

    555

    6

    1

    R

    T2

    47K

     

    6

      C

    T

    C3

     

    1 °·1

    J

    CT

     

    Rl

    lOOK

    14

    13

    11

    R3

    12

    22K

    9

    8

    10

    ICI

    C

    Cl

    CD4

    I 560pF

    560pF

    2

    6

    4

    5

    T1

     

    6.3V

    1

    1-12A

    0

    2

     

    TO

    lOOK

    111VAC

    a

    FIG. 3- THISCIRCUITIS ideal for experimenting with ultrasonic signals. It can supply either a pulsed

    or continuous output.

    petual motion as one can come. Thus , I

    couldn't wait to pry open the repe ller 's

    x   x plastic case and see

    wha t made it  tick .

    Figure I is the circ uit of the device we

    tested .' We were quite surprised to find

    that the circu it was simply a 555 timer IC

    connected as a squarewave generator. Its

    base frequenc y is approximately 45 kHz,

    as determined by the values of Rl , R2,

    and C l .

    The 45 -kH z  carrier

      is frequ ency

    modulated by a modified trapizoidal volt

    age waveform app lied to pin 5 of the 555

    time r. Tha t modulating voltage is de

    veloped by a network consisting of C2 ,

    R3, and R4 connec ted across one leg of

    the bridge rectifier. A check with an os

    cilloscope showe d a sweep of approx

    imately 20 kHz on eac h side of the base

    FIG.

      THIS

    PEST REPELLER of French design is built around a CD4 quad NANO gate. The

    schematic diagram is shown in a; a block diagram of the IC is shown in b .