[paraj_2014] reverse micellar extraction of fungal glucoamylase produced in

Upload: sivamani-selvaraju

Post on 03-Mar-2018

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/26/2019 [Paraj_2014] Reverse Micellar Extraction of Fungal Glucoamylase Produced In

    1/9

    December 2014Vol. 24No. 12

    J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. (2014),24(12), 16901698http://dx.doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1407.07016 ResearchArticle jmbReview

    Reverse Micellar Extraction of Fungal Glucoamylase Produced inSolid-State Fermentation Culture

    , , -, , & , -,

    , , - ,

    Introduction

    D

    , 70%

    35.

    , ,

    , ,

    ,

    13, 19, 35.

    (E)

    , -

    -- 12. E

    , ,

    -, ,

    19, 23,

    32. H,

    , ,

    , H

    ,

    , , ,

    5.

    , , ,

    . H,

    3, ,

    (GA) E.

    I ,

    (48112 D)

    ,

    ,

    * +-

    +-

    - .

    -, -

    - , , (). ,

    , /

    .

    (.., ,

    -2--- () )

    .

    2.75, 100 , 200 . ,

    (/)

    2 3, . , 60%

    , 140%

    3.0-.

    , - , , , ,

  • 7/26/2019 [Paraj_2014] Reverse Micellar Extraction of Fungal Glucoamylase Produced In

    2/9

    1691 Paraj et al.

    J. Mic robiol. Biotechn ol.

    13.

    , H,

    23. ,

    6, 8. ,

    . I ,

    33.

    ,

    23. -

    (., , , -

    ), E

    . H,

    24, 26, 27.

    A ,

    25

    33% ,

    25.

    4, 25.

    C GA

    HLC 22,

    HLC 29, HLC 28,

    HLC 37, 10,

    - 31, 34,

    - 35,

    36. H, ,

    , ,

    .

    - , E. H,

    ,

    . F ,

    .

    (CCD)

    . F,

    .

    , ,

    .

    Materials and Methods

    G

    CCG 33991 (C C G,

    ) - -

    (ICAN, I). 50%

    (4 )

    - ,

    40 35C. A,

    40C

    5%, 4C.

    (DFB).

    A DFB

    50% DFB.

    100 ,

    120 100 .

    ( , N. 2)

    ( 684 10 ).

    .

    , AO, -

    ( 115.9, 150, 200, 250, 284.1 M AO

    ). F ,

    NC ( 15.9,

    50, 100, 150, 184.1 M NC ) H

    HC (1N) NOH (1N).

    A, 4 3

    20 . I

    5 1,580 . ,

    ,

    .

    ME GA F. 1.

    G

    .

    (0.1 ) (1.0 )

    1.0 (1% , H 4.54.6) 60C

    15 17. 15

    (-E, I).

    O (G)

    1.0 17.

    I

    M 14. 40C

    H 3 (0.006 /) . O

  • 7/26/2019 [Paraj_2014] Reverse Micellar Extraction of Fungal Glucoamylase Produced In

    3/9

    Reverse Micellar Extraction of Fungal Glucoamylase 1692

    December 2014Vol. 24No. 12

    (P) 1.0

    / .

    18. A 0.015 / -

    0.1 M H 5.0.

    25-

    . A- (1.0 )

    0.1 , ,

    20 40C. , 0.5

    3,5-

    10 . ,

    1,580 10

    530 . O

    () 1.0 /

    18.

    L ,

    21.

    (G/) (/),

    11.

    CCD

    , .

    A (. 3, A I I., NC, A).

    NC H , AO

    , ME

    1, 9.

    1. F

    , ;

    , .

    2. ()

    . A - ,

    ,

    () :

    (1)

    , 1.

    B, B, B

    - -

    - , 7. B

    , (0, 0, 0),

    38.

    A ,

    .

    A

    ,

    (/) .

    / H,

    + + +=

    Fig. 1. .

    : G; : .

    Table 1. ( ) ()

    .

    C

    C () A ()

    -1.682 15.9 115.9 2.16

    -1.000 50 150 2.5

    0.000 100 200 3.0

    +1.000 150 250 3.5

    1.682 184.1 284.1 3.84

  • 7/26/2019 [Paraj_2014] Reverse Micellar Extraction of Fungal Glucoamylase Produced In

    4/9

    1693 Paraj et al.

    J. Mic robiol. Biotechn ol.

    AO NC . A ,

    .

    F ,

    H, NC AO .P

    . A ,

    .

    .

    (., )

    .

    Results

    G

    - .

    ,

    . G .

    F. 2

    200 A, 100 C,

    H 3.0. F. 2A 2B 62%

    H 2.5.

    H, H 2.5 3.8

    20%. F, C 80

    ,

    60%

    40% (F. 2A 2C). ,

    A 120 280

    , 210

    (F. 2B 2C).

    -

    3. H

    C (-

    0.05) , A

    ( > 0.05).

    A

    ,

    .

    ( 1)

    (% = 56.789 - 3.528+ 1.325 - 12.318 - 5.278 -

    5.631 - 6.869

    (2)

    I - (

    1)

    (% = -226.018 + 0.352 + 0.927 + 140.208 - 0.002

    - 0.002- 27.474

    (3)

    B - ,

    Table 2. ()

    ,

    ,

    .

    .

    C

    (%)

    GA (%)C

    ()

    A

    ()

    ()

    C

    1 -1 -1 -1 52 71

    2 -1 -1 1 28 80

    3 -1 1 -1 56 76

    4 -1 1 1 28 90

    5 1 -1 -1 46 81

    6 1 -1 1 20 84

    7 1 1 -1 49 81

    8 1 1 1 21 90

    -

    9 -1.682 0 0 50 24

    10 1.682 0 0 38 91

    11 0 -1.682 0 40 101

    12 0 1.682 0 46 101

    13 0 0 -1.682 58 102

    14 0 0 1.682 21 105

    C

    15 0 0 0 53 108

    16 0 0 0 55 110

    17 0 0 0 58 114

    18 0 0 0 58 113

    19 0 0 0 57 116

    20 0 0 0 55 104

  • 7/26/2019 [Paraj_2014] Reverse Micellar Extraction of Fungal Glucoamylase Produced In

    5/9

    Reverse Micellar Extraction of Fungal Glucoamylase 1694

    December 2014Vol. 24No. 12

    A . H 2.5,

    H

    2.5. ,

    : 100 C,

    200 A, H 2.75. A

    51% .

    I

    (

    /

    )

    E,

    (., 100 C, 200 A, H 2.75).

    F. 3. E

    ,

    . /

    0.5 3,

    86% 130%

    .

    / 0.5 3 (F. 3). I

    0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, 3, 1.6, 1.8,

    2.0, 2.3, 2.6, .

    2.0

    / 2.0,

    . F ,

    / 2.

    Table 3.

    .

    D

    F- -

    C 1 170.0 170.0 19.7 0.001

    A 1 24.0 24.0 2.8 0.126

    1 2,072.2 2072.2 240.6 0.000

    CC 1 367.6 367.6 42.7 0.000

    CA 1 0 0 0 1.000

    C 1 0.5 0.5 0.06 0.815

    AA 1 420.8 420.8 48.9 0.000

    A 1 4.5 4.5 0.5 0.486

    1 635.6 635.6 73.8 0.000

    9 3,464.8 384.9 44.7 0.000

    () 3 2,266.2 755.4 87.7 0.000

    () 3 1,193.7 397.9 46.2 0.000

    (C ) 3 5.0 1.7 0.2 0.898

    E 10 86.1 8.6

    ( ) 5 66.1 13.2 3.3 0.108

    ( ) 5 20 4

    19 3,550.9

    97.6%

    A- 95.4%

    Fig. 2.

    . , , .

    () . C A = 200 . ()

    . A C = 100 . ()

    . A C = 3. GA

    10.9 G/ 2.72 /, .

    A: A B (2-E) , GA:

    G.

  • 7/26/2019 [Paraj_2014] Reverse Micellar Extraction of Fungal Glucoamylase Produced In

    6/9

    1695 Paraj et al.

    J. Mic robiol. Biotechn ol.

    F. 4. I ,

    .

    100 C,

    200 A, H 2.75.

    .

    107% 138% ( 30% )

    1 4. H,

    . C

    , 3-

    , 3-

    .

    I ,

    . , (.,

    )

    . (100 C,

    200 A, H 2.75, / 2), ,

    F. 5.

    -

    130%. F,

    60%

    E. ,

    ,

    (F. 5).

    Fig. 3.

    .

    (GA) ( ) () 100 C, 200 A, 2.75. GA

    11.6 G/ 2.97 /,

    .

    Fig. 4.

    .

    (GA) ( )

    () 100 C, 200 A, 2.75, /=

    2. GA 11.3 G/

    2.70 /, .

    Fig. 5.

    .

    (GA) ( ),

    (), (), ( )

    100 C, 200 A, 2.75, /= 2. GA

    , , ,

    12.9 G/, 120.88 /, 42.87 /, 2.21 /,

    .

  • 7/26/2019 [Paraj_2014] Reverse Micellar Extraction of Fungal Glucoamylase Produced In

    7/9

    Reverse Micellar Extraction of Fungal Glucoamylase 1696

    December 2014Vol. 24No. 12

    Discussion

    G,

    , -

    . C A H

    .

    I , H C

    , ,

    A .

    H

    1, 19. F,

    , ,

    5,

    11.

    . H,

    , ,

    H

    A.

    H 3.6, (48

    112 D), H

    A- . H,

    .

    19, 20.

    I /

    . ,

    ,

    .

    /

    .

    ,

    .

    . ,

    16,

    9 13.514 D,

    2. , (H 2.75),

    . F,

    50 D 4.0

    15. , 60%

    .

    19, 30. A

    , H

    ,

    /

    A.

    I , -

    E

    . H, C A

    2.75, 100, 200 , .

    2

    50% ,

    140%

    3.0-.

    ,

    E.

    Acknowledgments

    I C

    A &

    I B G D

    C E, I .

    Equation Variables

    B C

    B L

    B

  • 7/26/2019 [Paraj_2014] Reverse Micellar Extraction of Fungal Glucoamylase Produced In

    8/9

    1697 Paraj et al.

    J. Mic robiol. Biotechn ol.

    References

    1. A BA, P DL, A JA. 1994. H

    . 1052-1058.

    2. B QK, K M, M L, H G. 2001. M

    : .

    326-338.

    3. B MB, P P, P , B. 2008. A

    .

    379-384.

    4. B HN, MH, N , A MM, P ,

    J A. 2007. P

    . 338-343.

    5. C L, CK, C BH. 2006. O

    .

    752-758.

    6. C E J AP, F MGA, IC, M. 2004.O

    .

    47-54.

    7. D A, D. 1999. .

    - N .

    8. F LFP, ME, M, C A, P J A.

    2005. L

    . 411-416.

    9. G DA, DC. 2010. E

    (IG1) /

    . 1352-1360.

    10. G NP, M, L BK, K NG.

    1991. E

    . 235-241.

    11. H FA, G DB, IC, P J A.

    2007.

    -6-

    . 262-266.

    12. H DG, M C. 1998. E

    -- .

    557-566.

    13. H AB, H H, KM. 2010. M

    -

    . 263-268.

    14. I L, M DA. 1996. L

    -. 171-175.

    15. K HM. 1988. M .

    1-65.

    16. K J. 2007. ,

    .

    G - EP 1864670 A4.

    17. K M. 2004.

    .

    , I.

    18. K J, G , P H, K. 2002. D

    , -, .

    80-87.19. K H, ND, KM, K NG.

    2002.

    /. 119-176.

    20. L JG, JM, C , L H. 2006. P

    : .

    267-273.

    21. L OH, NJ, F AL, J. 1951.

    P F- .

    265-275.

    22. M PB, K , B P. 1983. P

    . 482-485.

    23. M D, J . 2007.

    / .

    199-215.

    24. N KE, NK. 2010.

    -

    . 763-771.

    25. N QD, - JM, C M, I, H

    A. 2002. P

    ACC 34626. 345-352.

    26. N KH, I J. 2005. O- ,

    . 95-101.

    27. N KH, M, I J. 2005.

    . 131-136.

    28. O K, , O . 1988. E

    :

    (B -5421).

    1707-1714.

    29. P A, M I, L J, K J,

    J. 1982. A

    B C

    ( = 1 C, = 2 A, = 3 H)

    C

  • 7/26/2019 [Paraj_2014] Reverse Micellar Extraction of Fungal Glucoamylase Produced In

    9/9

    Reverse Micellar Extraction of Fungal Glucoamylase 1698

    December 2014Vol. 24No. 12

    C. 63-66.

    30. P MJ, A-B M, C JM. 1996. L-

    . 290-301.

    31. M, H O, M B. 1995. E

    . 901-906.

    32. EMG, M AMF, P J A. 1999.

    : AO-

    .

    121-125.

    33. CK, C BH. 2003. E -G

    .

    1639-1645.

    34. , KM, G MK. 1997. A

    . 635-641.

    35. , ND, G MK, KM.2000. A -

    . 63-68.

    36. , L , K K, G MN. 2001. O

    . 295-299.

    37. M, K M, M H. 1989. P

    .

    247-249.

    38. L. 2004. .

    -CH, .