[paraj_2014] reverse micellar extraction of fungal glucoamylase produced in
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/26/2019 [Paraj_2014] Reverse Micellar Extraction of Fungal Glucoamylase Produced In
1/9
December 2014Vol. 24No. 12
J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. (2014),24(12), 16901698http://dx.doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1407.07016 ResearchArticle jmbReview
Reverse Micellar Extraction of Fungal Glucoamylase Produced inSolid-State Fermentation Culture
, , -, , & , -,
, , - ,
Introduction
D
, 70%
35.
, ,
, ,
,
13, 19, 35.
(E)
, -
-- 12. E
, ,
-, ,
19, 23,
32. H,
, ,
, H
,
, , ,
5.
, , ,
. H,
3, ,
(GA) E.
I ,
(48112 D)
,
,
* +-
+-
- .
-, -
- , , (). ,
, /
.
(.., ,
-2--- () )
.
2.75, 100 , 200 . ,
(/)
2 3, . , 60%
, 140%
3.0-.
, - , , , ,
-
7/26/2019 [Paraj_2014] Reverse Micellar Extraction of Fungal Glucoamylase Produced In
2/9
1691 Paraj et al.
J. Mic robiol. Biotechn ol.
13.
, H,
23. ,
6, 8. ,
. I ,
33.
,
23. -
(., , , -
), E
. H,
24, 26, 27.
A ,
25
33% ,
25.
4, 25.
C GA
HLC 22,
HLC 29, HLC 28,
HLC 37, 10,
- 31, 34,
- 35,
36. H, ,
, ,
.
- , E. H,
,
. F ,
.
(CCD)
. F,
.
, ,
.
Materials and Methods
G
CCG 33991 (C C G,
) - -
(ICAN, I). 50%
(4 )
- ,
40 35C. A,
40C
5%, 4C.
(DFB).
A DFB
50% DFB.
100 ,
120 100 .
( , N. 2)
( 684 10 ).
.
, AO, -
( 115.9, 150, 200, 250, 284.1 M AO
). F ,
NC ( 15.9,
50, 100, 150, 184.1 M NC ) H
HC (1N) NOH (1N).
A, 4 3
20 . I
5 1,580 . ,
,
.
ME GA F. 1.
G
.
(0.1 ) (1.0 )
1.0 (1% , H 4.54.6) 60C
15 17. 15
(-E, I).
O (G)
1.0 17.
I
M 14. 40C
H 3 (0.006 /) . O
-
7/26/2019 [Paraj_2014] Reverse Micellar Extraction of Fungal Glucoamylase Produced In
3/9
Reverse Micellar Extraction of Fungal Glucoamylase 1692
December 2014Vol. 24No. 12
(P) 1.0
/ .
18. A 0.015 / -
0.1 M H 5.0.
25-
. A- (1.0 )
0.1 , ,
20 40C. , 0.5
3,5-
10 . ,
1,580 10
530 . O
() 1.0 /
18.
L ,
21.
(G/) (/),
11.
CCD
, .
A (. 3, A I I., NC, A).
NC H , AO
, ME
1, 9.
1. F
, ;
, .
2. ()
. A - ,
,
() :
(1)
, 1.
B, B, B
- -
- , 7. B
, (0, 0, 0),
38.
A ,
.
A
,
(/) .
/ H,
+ + +=
Fig. 1. .
: G; : .
Table 1. ( ) ()
.
C
C () A ()
-1.682 15.9 115.9 2.16
-1.000 50 150 2.5
0.000 100 200 3.0
+1.000 150 250 3.5
1.682 184.1 284.1 3.84
-
7/26/2019 [Paraj_2014] Reverse Micellar Extraction of Fungal Glucoamylase Produced In
4/9
1693 Paraj et al.
J. Mic robiol. Biotechn ol.
AO NC . A ,
.
F ,
H, NC AO .P
. A ,
.
.
(., )
.
Results
G
- .
,
. G .
F. 2
200 A, 100 C,
H 3.0. F. 2A 2B 62%
H 2.5.
H, H 2.5 3.8
20%. F, C 80
,
60%
40% (F. 2A 2C). ,
A 120 280
, 210
(F. 2B 2C).
-
3. H
C (-
0.05) , A
( > 0.05).
A
,
.
( 1)
(% = 56.789 - 3.528+ 1.325 - 12.318 - 5.278 -
5.631 - 6.869
(2)
I - (
1)
(% = -226.018 + 0.352 + 0.927 + 140.208 - 0.002
- 0.002- 27.474
(3)
B - ,
Table 2. ()
,
,
.
.
C
(%)
GA (%)C
()
A
()
()
C
1 -1 -1 -1 52 71
2 -1 -1 1 28 80
3 -1 1 -1 56 76
4 -1 1 1 28 90
5 1 -1 -1 46 81
6 1 -1 1 20 84
7 1 1 -1 49 81
8 1 1 1 21 90
-
9 -1.682 0 0 50 24
10 1.682 0 0 38 91
11 0 -1.682 0 40 101
12 0 1.682 0 46 101
13 0 0 -1.682 58 102
14 0 0 1.682 21 105
C
15 0 0 0 53 108
16 0 0 0 55 110
17 0 0 0 58 114
18 0 0 0 58 113
19 0 0 0 57 116
20 0 0 0 55 104
-
7/26/2019 [Paraj_2014] Reverse Micellar Extraction of Fungal Glucoamylase Produced In
5/9
Reverse Micellar Extraction of Fungal Glucoamylase 1694
December 2014Vol. 24No. 12
A . H 2.5,
H
2.5. ,
: 100 C,
200 A, H 2.75. A
51% .
I
(
/
)
E,
(., 100 C, 200 A, H 2.75).
F. 3. E
,
. /
0.5 3,
86% 130%
.
/ 0.5 3 (F. 3). I
0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, 3, 1.6, 1.8,
2.0, 2.3, 2.6, .
2.0
/ 2.0,
. F ,
/ 2.
Table 3.
.
D
F- -
C 1 170.0 170.0 19.7 0.001
A 1 24.0 24.0 2.8 0.126
1 2,072.2 2072.2 240.6 0.000
CC 1 367.6 367.6 42.7 0.000
CA 1 0 0 0 1.000
C 1 0.5 0.5 0.06 0.815
AA 1 420.8 420.8 48.9 0.000
A 1 4.5 4.5 0.5 0.486
1 635.6 635.6 73.8 0.000
9 3,464.8 384.9 44.7 0.000
() 3 2,266.2 755.4 87.7 0.000
() 3 1,193.7 397.9 46.2 0.000
(C ) 3 5.0 1.7 0.2 0.898
E 10 86.1 8.6
( ) 5 66.1 13.2 3.3 0.108
( ) 5 20 4
19 3,550.9
97.6%
A- 95.4%
Fig. 2.
. , , .
() . C A = 200 . ()
. A C = 100 . ()
. A C = 3. GA
10.9 G/ 2.72 /, .
A: A B (2-E) , GA:
G.
-
7/26/2019 [Paraj_2014] Reverse Micellar Extraction of Fungal Glucoamylase Produced In
6/9
1695 Paraj et al.
J. Mic robiol. Biotechn ol.
F. 4. I ,
.
100 C,
200 A, H 2.75.
.
107% 138% ( 30% )
1 4. H,
. C
, 3-
, 3-
.
I ,
. , (.,
)
. (100 C,
200 A, H 2.75, / 2), ,
F. 5.
-
130%. F,
60%
E. ,
,
(F. 5).
Fig. 3.
.
(GA) ( ) () 100 C, 200 A, 2.75. GA
11.6 G/ 2.97 /,
.
Fig. 4.
.
(GA) ( )
() 100 C, 200 A, 2.75, /=
2. GA 11.3 G/
2.70 /, .
Fig. 5.
.
(GA) ( ),
(), (), ( )
100 C, 200 A, 2.75, /= 2. GA
, , ,
12.9 G/, 120.88 /, 42.87 /, 2.21 /,
.
-
7/26/2019 [Paraj_2014] Reverse Micellar Extraction of Fungal Glucoamylase Produced In
7/9
Reverse Micellar Extraction of Fungal Glucoamylase 1696
December 2014Vol. 24No. 12
Discussion
G,
, -
. C A H
.
I , H C
, ,
A .
H
1, 19. F,
, ,
5,
11.
. H,
, ,
H
A.
H 3.6, (48
112 D), H
A- . H,
.
19, 20.
I /
. ,
,
.
/
.
,
.
. ,
16,
9 13.514 D,
2. , (H 2.75),
. F,
50 D 4.0
15. , 60%
.
19, 30. A
, H
,
/
A.
I , -
E
. H, C A
2.75, 100, 200 , .
2
50% ,
140%
3.0-.
,
E.
Acknowledgments
I C
A &
I B G D
C E, I .
Equation Variables
B C
B L
B
-
7/26/2019 [Paraj_2014] Reverse Micellar Extraction of Fungal Glucoamylase Produced In
8/9
1697 Paraj et al.
J. Mic robiol. Biotechn ol.
References
1. A BA, P DL, A JA. 1994. H
. 1052-1058.
2. B QK, K M, M L, H G. 2001. M
: .
326-338.
3. B MB, P P, P , B. 2008. A
.
379-384.
4. B HN, MH, N , A MM, P ,
J A. 2007. P
. 338-343.
5. C L, CK, C BH. 2006. O
.
752-758.
6. C E J AP, F MGA, IC, M. 2004.O
.
47-54.
7. D A, D. 1999. .
- N .
8. F LFP, ME, M, C A, P J A.
2005. L
. 411-416.
9. G DA, DC. 2010. E
(IG1) /
. 1352-1360.
10. G NP, M, L BK, K NG.
1991. E
. 235-241.
11. H FA, G DB, IC, P J A.
2007.
-6-
. 262-266.
12. H DG, M C. 1998. E
-- .
557-566.
13. H AB, H H, KM. 2010. M
-
. 263-268.
14. I L, M DA. 1996. L
-. 171-175.
15. K HM. 1988. M .
1-65.
16. K J. 2007. ,
.
G - EP 1864670 A4.
17. K M. 2004.
.
, I.
18. K J, G , P H, K. 2002. D
, -, .
80-87.19. K H, ND, KM, K NG.
2002.
/. 119-176.
20. L JG, JM, C , L H. 2006. P
: .
267-273.
21. L OH, NJ, F AL, J. 1951.
P F- .
265-275.
22. M PB, K , B P. 1983. P
. 482-485.
23. M D, J . 2007.
/ .
199-215.
24. N KE, NK. 2010.
-
. 763-771.
25. N QD, - JM, C M, I, H
A. 2002. P
ACC 34626. 345-352.
26. N KH, I J. 2005. O- ,
. 95-101.
27. N KH, M, I J. 2005.
. 131-136.
28. O K, , O . 1988. E
:
(B -5421).
1707-1714.
29. P A, M I, L J, K J,
J. 1982. A
B C
( = 1 C, = 2 A, = 3 H)
C
-
7/26/2019 [Paraj_2014] Reverse Micellar Extraction of Fungal Glucoamylase Produced In
9/9
Reverse Micellar Extraction of Fungal Glucoamylase 1698
December 2014Vol. 24No. 12
C. 63-66.
30. P MJ, A-B M, C JM. 1996. L-
. 290-301.
31. M, H O, M B. 1995. E
. 901-906.
32. EMG, M AMF, P J A. 1999.
: AO-
.
121-125.
33. CK, C BH. 2003. E -G
.
1639-1645.
34. , KM, G MK. 1997. A
. 635-641.
35. , ND, G MK, KM.2000. A -
. 63-68.
36. , L , K K, G MN. 2001. O
. 295-299.
37. M, K M, M H. 1989. P
.
247-249.
38. L. 2004. .
-CH, .