parkinson’s disease: pathophysiology and medical therapy ... › files › 2009 › ... ·...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Parkinson’s Disease: Pathophysiology and Medical Therapy Textbook Chapter: Neurosurgery, ed. Maciunas, Wilkins, Rengachary
Michael S. Okun, M.D., Jerrold L. Vitek M.D., PhD.
Introduction
Over one million American’s suffer from PD with 60,000 new cases of
Parkinson’s Disease (PD) diagnosed in the United States each year.[1, 2] The incidence
of PD increases with age and is estimated at 20 per 100,000.[3, 4] PD and its associated
morbidities cost society approximately 5.6 billion dollars per year.[5] Its cost in quality
of life for affected individuals, however, cannot be measured. Significant advances in
medical (dopamine agonists, dopamine extenders, and selective dopamine blockers) and
surgical therapy (pallidotomy, deep brain stimulation (DBS), and transplant) as well as an
improved understanding of physiology, genetics, pathology, and molecular biology of the
disease.
History
James Parkinson was a general practitioner in the East end of London, better
known for his social activities than for his descriptions of a shaking disease. He wrote
revolutionary pamphlets under the pseudonym “old Hubert” and was hailed as an agitator
on more than one occasion.[6, 7] His 1817 Essay on the Shaking Palsy went largely
unnoticed until Charcot and others began referring to it as Parkinson’s Disease.
Parkinson referenced Galen and Boetius and offered a compelling description of patients
with “shaking and shuffling” which is comparable to modern textbooks and articles.
Despite his erroneous assumption that PD was due to a lesion in the spinal cord, as well
as his failure to recognize that the tremor abated during sleep, his description is thorough.
It was evident however, that Parkinson had little understanding of Parkinson’s plus
2
disorders, one of which (multiple systems atrophy) served as his first case description.[6]
The re-exploration of his essay has led to a revival in the study of what is now the second
most common neurodegenerative disease. [4]
Mechanisms of Disease
The mechanisms causing PD remain a mystery. We have, however elucidated
over the past several decades many risk factors, and potential causes. Oxidative stress,
nitrous oxide formation, mitochondrial dysfunction, toxins, and inflammatory processes
may all play a role in the pathogenesis of this disease by accelerating apoptosis of
dopaminergic cells in the pars compacta portion of the substantia nigra (SNc).[3, 8-16]
Additionally, it has been postulated that increased output of the excitatory
neurotransmitter glutamate, may cause cell loss in the SNc by the mechanism of
excitotoxicity.[10, 17, 18] Immune mediated destruction of cells by glia, may also play a
role in cell loss in the SNc by accelerating the release of toxic cytokines.[19]
Oxidative stress was recognized in 1975 as a potential cause of PD. PD patients
have a significant reduction in the activity of catalase and peroxidase in the striatum and
substantia nigra. The reduction in peroxidase results in a decrease in production of
peroxides leading to injury and death of dopaminergic neurons.[9] Also reported is an
increase in superoxide dismutase activity leading to an increase in hydrogen peroxide and
iron deposition. In the presence of iron, cytotoxic hydroxyl radicals are formed at an
accelerated rate causing an increase in cellular destruction.[12, 20] Further support for a
possible role of oxidative stress in promoting cell loss was the discovery of decreased
glutathione in the substantia nigra. Glutathione is a natural anti-oxidant serving as a
substrate for glutathione peroxidase. Glutathione is consumed when glutathione
3
peroxidase catalyzes the peroxidase reaction. Reduced glutathione is likely a marker of
oxidative stress.[21, 22]
The thirty percent decrease in mitochondrial complex I activity in substantia nigra
neurons has raised questions as to whether PD patients have a greater susceptibility to
apoptosis or environmental influences.[23, 24] A recent rat model of Parkinson’s disease
utilized the mitochondrial toxin roetenone to produce Parkinsonian animals.[25, 26] This
toxin is an inhibitor of the mitochondrial respiratory chain, and is a commonly used
pesticide. Its discovery has led to increased speculation as to the role of environmental
toxins in PD.
The most important description of a model of parkinsonism is that of Langston.
Parkinsonian symptoms were induced by 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine
(MPTP), a contaminant of synthetic heroin first seen by Langston in California after
several recreational drug users presented with parkinsonism, suggesting that
environmental toxins could precipitate symptoms. This discovery subsequently led to the
development of the primate MPTP model of PD. MPTP is converted to MPP+ by
monoaminoxidase-B (MAO-B). MPP+, the mitochondrial complex I inhibitor, is
concentrated in dopaminergic cells as a result of the dopamine reuptake system. MPP+ is
selectively toxic to the nigral-striatal pathway and produces motor deficits similar to PD
in humans and non-human primates. Patients respond to antiparkinson medications, and
may develop dyskinesias and dystonia. Pathologically Lewy Bodies are not seen, though
in older primates there may be similar inclusions. The MPTP model of PD has been
highly useful in the study of PD,[27] and the pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying
its development.[28, 29].
4
Other environmental factors including rural living, well water use, exposure to
pesticides, exposure to industrial chemicals, manganese toxicity (miners), and dopamine
blocking drugs have also been implicated as potential risk factors for PD.[1, 2, 30]
Genetics
Important advances have been made in the understanding of genetics in PD in part
due to the historical observation of Gowers who noticed an increased incidence within
certain families.[4, 31] Both an autosomal dominant trait with variable penetrance and
mutifactorial causation have been identified.[4, 17] Four mutations (Park1-4) have been
described in families with symptoms of PD. Two of the mutations (Park1 and Park3)
were found in genes coding for alpha-synuclein, a component in Lewy bodies. The role
of alpha-synuclein, an enzyme involved in ubiquitin metabolism, is unknown, but it may
contribute to aggregations that increase the selective vulnerability of dopaminergic
neurons to oxidative stress.[32, 33] Additional genetic information has been derived
from the observation that possessing the apoprotein E4 allele (Alzheimer’s allele) as well
as an alpha-synuclein allele may impart an increased incidence for developing PD.[32,
34, 35]
Physiology of PD
An understanding of neuroanatomy and physiology of the basal ganglia and its
related structures has allowed us to develop a model of its functional organization (Figure
1). The model views the basal ganglia as part of a family segregated circuits involving
the thalamus and cerebral cortex.[36, 37] These circuits originate from different areas of
the cerebral cortex and project to specific portions of the basal ganglia. These structures
in turn project to different regions of thalamus and return to their site of origins in the
5
frontal cortex. Both motor and nonmotor circuits have been described. Nonmotor
circuits project to association and limbic areas, while the motor circuits project to areas of
the cerebral cortex involved in the control of movement. The “motor” circuit has been
considered the most important in the pathogenesis of PD as well as other hypo and
hyperkinetic movement disorders. Many of the non-motor circuits in PD play central
roles in the behavioral and non-motor symptoms of disease.
The motor circuit originates in the pre-central motor and somatosensory cortical
areas and projects to motor areas of the basal ganglia and thalamus en route to its return
to motor and premotor cortical areas. Cortical input influences the two major output
routes of the basal ganglia, the internal segment of the globus pallidus (GPi) and the
substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr), through two pathways. The routes are referred to
as the direct and indirect pathways. The direct pathway (D1 receptors) takes origin from
putaminal medium spiny neurons and contains monosynaptic connections to GPi and
SNr. The indirect pathway (D2 receptors) originates from medium spiny neurons and
projects via the external segment of the globus pallidus (GPe) and subthalamic nucleus to
the GPi and SNr. There are also return projections from the STN to GPe, and direct
projections from GPe to GPi, SNr, and the reticularis nucleus of the thalamus.[38] A
simplified version of this model is presented in figure 1.
The pallidal receiving area of the GPi projects to the motor thalamus, which
consists of ventralis lateralis pars oralis, VLo and ventralis anterior, VA.[39-41] VLo
and VA project predominantly to premotor and supplementary motor areas, but also have
smaller projections to primary motor and arcuate premotor areas.[42-44] The SNr
projects to ventralis anterior magnocellularis, VAmc, which in turn projects directly to
6
the prefrontal cortex.[45] GPi and SNr also project to the superior colliculus and
midbrain tegmentum[46, 47], and may account for some of the eye movement
abnormalities present in PD patients.
The intrinsic and output projections from the basal ganglia (putamen, GPe, GPi,
SNr) are all gabaergic and inhibitory with the exception of the STN which is
glutaminergic and excitatory. The projections from the cerebral cortex to the putamen as
well as the projections of thalamus to cortex are glutaminergic and excitatory.
The basal ganglia thalamocortical circuit in the parkinsonian monkey has led to a
model useful for understanding the changes seen in PD. Loss of dopamine cells in SNc
leads to differential changes in neuronal activity in the direct and indirect pathways. In
the direct pathway there is a decrease in inhibitory activity from the putamen to the GPi,
leading in an increase in inhibitory activity of GPi to thalamus and brainstem. In the
indirect pathway there is a loss of excitation of the GPe by putamen resulting in
decreased inhibitory output from GPe to STN. This decreased inhibitory output leads to
excessive excitatory output to the GPi, increasing inhibitory output of GPi to the
thalamus and brainstem. Thus, both the direct and indirect pathways lead to increased
inhibitory activity from GPi to the thalamus and brainstem in PD.[29, 36, 37, 48, 49]
Inhibition of thalamocortical and the midbrain projections in the motor circuit has
been proposed as the primary cause for the development of parkinsonian motor signs and
hypokinetic features of PD.[37] The model predicts that loss or lowering of inhibitory
input from the GPi to thalamus results in the hyperkinetic movements associated with
dug induced dyskinesias.[50, 51] Studies of changes in mean firing rates in both humans
with PD and animal models of PD are consistent with those predicted by the “rate”
7
model.[52-54] PET studies in PD also support the model showing increased activity in
cortical motor areas following pallidotomy consistent with disinhibition of
thalamocortical pathways.[55, 56]
The observed effects of lesioning different structures in the circuit both support
and refute the model. Lesions of STN and GPi improve the major motor symptoms of
PD, while lesions of the GPe worsen them.[57, 58] However, lesions in the motor
thalamus do not exacerbate or induce PD, but can improve tremor and rigidity.[51, 59]
Lesions in GPi which are predicted by the model to exacerbate levodopa induced
dyskinesias are highly effective in alleviating them in PD. Changes in the firing rate of
neurons within the pallido-thalamic circuit cannot account for these observations. As a
result of these observations, together with a review of the patterns of neuronal activity in
the GPi, STN, and thalamus in patient and animal models of PD it has been hypothesized
that the motor signs occur as a result of a combination of changes in both the rate and
pattern of neuronal activity.[60, 61] More recently, alternative pathways as well as
changes in the somatosensory responsiveness and amount of synchronization of neuronal
activity in the pallido-thalamocortical circuit have been incorporated into the model.[62]
Other potentially important pathways in the pathogenesis of parkinsonian signs
include those from GPi and SNr to the midbrain extrapyramidal area (MEA) and the
pedunculopontine nucleus (PPN). The MEA sends projections back to the GPi and SNr
as well as the brainstem and spinal cord, while the PPN has extensive projections to
thalamus and spinal cord.[63-66]
8
Pathology of PD
Gross examination of the midbrain in PD reveals the hallmark loss of
dopaminergic cells of the substantia nigra. Microscopic examination reveals loss of
neuromelanin and accompanying gliosis in the SNc. These changes are widespread and
occurring in both motor and nonmotor portions of the basal ganglia.[67, 68] Involvement
of the PPN, may account for some of the axial symptoms observed in PD patients,
including balance and gait symptoms.[64, 66, 69]
Intracellular eosinophilic inclusions termed Lewy Bodies may be seen in nigral
neurons as well as in cortex, subcortical locations, and peripheral ganglia. They are
present in 75% of cases and are considered the pathological hallmark of PD. They stain
positively for ubiquitin and alpha-synuclein. The significance of the phosphorylated
neurofilamentous inclusions in PD remain a mystery. Also a mystery is that they may be
present in other neurodegenerative diseases including Alzheimer’s, progressive
supranuclear palsy, prion disease, and diffuse Lewy body disease.[70-72]
The presence of alpha-synuclein in Parkinson’s Disease and multiple systems
atrophy is useful for pathological diagnosis. Progressive supranuclear palsy, Alzheimer’s
Disease, and corticobasal ganglionic degeneration do not stain for alpha synuclein, but do
stain for another neural protein, tau. These staining attributes have led some investigators
to refer to PD as a synucleinopathy, whereas the other diseases may be referred to as
tauopathies.[71-73] This new terminology is not in wide use.
Clinical Presentation
The cardinal motor signs of PD are tremor, bradykinesia, rigidity, and a gait
disorder. Patients can present in a variety of ways but often are seen first with tremor,
9
decreased arm swing, or shuffling gait. It is important to consider that younger patients
will commonly present with pain (secondary to dystonia) and rigidity.[74] Twenty
percent or more of patients with PD will not manifest tremor.[1, 68, 75, 76]
Recently diagnostic criteria have been proposed for PD.[1, 5, 77] Patients may
present with one of three different phenotypic forms of disease (tremor predominant,
akinetic rigid, postural instability/gait problems). Criteria for diagnosis of PD include a
year or more of tremor, bradykinesia, or rigidity. Also part of inclusion criteria was
responsiveness to L-Dopa therapy (at least one gram/day for a month). Exclusion criteria
included abrupt onset, remitting course, stepwise progression, neuroleptic therapy within
a year, exposure to toxins, encephalitis, oculogyric crises, supranuclear gaze palsy,
cerebellar signs, lower motor neuron signs, pyramidal signs, severe autonomic failure,
dementia at onset, early falling, cerebrovascular disease, or unilateral dystonia with
apraxia or cortical sensory loss.[5, 76, 77] Presence of any exclusion criteria suggests an
alternative diagnosis. Exclusion criteria may be present concomitant with a diagnosis of
PD if the symptoms are explainable (e.g. the PD patient with an unrelated neuropathy, or
previous traumatic brain injury). Care must be taken by the practitioner to identify
exposure to dopamine blocking medications, environmental factors, genetic influences,
and in differentiating PD from Parkinson’s like syndromes. There are important
diagnostic clues that may be helpful in separating out these syndromes (Table 1). If the
symptoms cannot be clearly differentiated, a fluordeoxyglucose positron emission
tomography scan (FDG-PET) may be helpful in discerning PD from PD plus disorders.
PD usually shows a characteristic striatal hypermetabolic pattern, while the atypical
Parkinson’s like disorders reveal a hypometabolic pattern.[78, 79]
10
The classical picture of a patient with advanced PD includes a stooped posture
and a shuffling gait. The patient may have start hesitation when walking, and may freeze.
Turning is often difficult and requires many steps (pedestal turning, or en bloq turning).
The PD patient may have difficulty initiating gait (start hesitation) followed by a gradual
acceleration with many short shuffling steps and a reduced stride length. This
phenomenon where the PD patient appears to be chasing his or her center of gravity is
referred to as festination.
Tremor in PD is common and is often a diagnostic feature. Resting tremor is
particularly helpful in differentiating this disorder from Parkinson like syndromes or from
Wilson’s Disease, Multiple Sclerosis, Holmes tremor, and dystonic tremor. Identifying
tremor in PD is relatively straightforward. It is usually course and variable in amplitude
with a frequency of 4-6 Hz. In some cases it may be more rapid and in severe cases it
may be present during both posture and action. PD tremor is typically distal involving
one or more fingers or toes. However, it may occur proximally, involving the forearm or
the proximal lower extremity. It may be present locally in 1 or all 4 extremities, and may
include the jaw.[68] It is not uncommon for patients to present with a slight postural
action tremor, but if found on exam it requires an intensive search for an alternative
diagnosis because essential tremor (ET) frequently coexists with PD. Additionally
families have been described with both PD/ET or with some family member suffering
exclusively from PD while others suffer exclusively from ET.[80-82] We have found
that many patients referred to us with a diagnosis of PD actually have postural/action
tremor in the absence of rigidity, resting tremor, or gait difficulties. Closer scrutiny and
longer followup has proven many of these cases are ET.
11
Rigidity is also a common symptom of PD and is present in virtually all patients
with more than mild disease. It is usually asymmetric and worse on the side where
symptoms began. The classical pattern of rigidity can be picked up on examination by
moving the wrists, elbows, ankles, and knees slowly through a passive range of motion.
Patients typically exhibit a cogwheeling rigidity, which can sometimes be reinforced by
having them open and close the contralateral hand while the examination of the ipsilateral
side proceeds.
Bradykinesia is another cardinal motor symptom of Parkinson’s Disease.
Examination reveals slow finger or foot tapping that is usually asymmetric. Patients may
begin with an excellent performance, but persistence of tasks will result in fatigue,
decreased amplitude of movement, and worsening dexterity. In addition to tapping, and
rapid alternating movements, proximal movements and truncal movements may also be
slowed.
One of the first symptoms a patient may notice is sloppiness of handwriting.
Gradually this may evolve into the formation of small letters when writing, a finding
referred to as micrographia. If the examiner has the patient continue to write the same
phrase over and over he or she may be able to demonstrate micrographia by fatiguing the
patient.
Later in the disease patients may experience progressive gait difficulties and
postural instability leading to a tendency to fall. The gait symptoms may have an
excellent response to dopaminergic or dopamine agonist therapy, but may become more
difficult to treat later in the illness if postural reflexes are lost. Falls are responsible for
much of the morbidity and mortality associated with PD making the advent of physical
12
therapy, education, and assistive walking devices essential to the multidisciplinary
approach to caring for these patients.[83]
The voice in PD has a tendency to become softer during disease progression.
This finding, known as hypophonia, may occur without the patient being aware that
others perceive his or her voice to be soft. Treatment of this complication is centered on
optimizing medications, teaching the patient to project his or her voice (Lee Silverberg
technique), and using a speech therapist familiar with PD patients.[84, 85] Later in the
illness the speech may become soft and slurred making it extremely difficult to
understand.
Depression in PD is common and is reported in 25-40% of all cases.[86-89]
Patients complain of decreased energy, and a lack of enjoyment in their activities with or
without emotional lability. These symptoms generally respond to treatment with
antidepressant medications.[5, 90] Thyroid function should be checked in light of recent
data that suggests an increased incidence of thyroid disease in PD.[91-96] A
thyroidopathy or other endocrinopathy may prohibit optimal treatment of depression with
an serotonin reutake inhibitor (SSRI) or a tricyclic antidepressant (TCA).[96]
Medical Therapy of Parkinson’s Disease
The main treatment objective in administering medications to patients with PD is
to improve the quality of life. In addition to many useful medications it is important to
encourage a daily stretching routine and exercise program, which will improve flexibility
and mobility and may decrease the need in some patients for pharmacotherapy.[5] The
individual problems with the motor system encountered in PD can be treated medically
depending on the situation. The mainstays of therapy include sinemet
13
(carbidopa/levodopa), dopamine agonists, COMT inhibitors, anticholinergics, MAO
inhibitors, and amantadine (Tables 2,3). The decision to begin medical therapy is often
difficult. It requires a discussion between the physician and the patient to ascertain how
much the symptoms are disrupting the patient’s quality of life or ability to function at
work. A slight tremor, for example, may not bother one patient, but may be embarrassing
or disabling to another. Falling, severe bradykinesia, severe rigidity or pain may be an
immediate indication to start medical therapy. When at the beginning of the illness there
should be consideration of medicines that may be neuroprotective such as MAO-B
inhibitors, or vitamin E. To date there is no conclusive study showing any medicine is
neuroprotective,[97] so in our practice we educate the patient and work together in
making the decision to start medical treatment.
The treatment algorithm for PD has recently changed with the advent of dopamine
agonists and an understanding that beginning therapy with dopamine agonists may reduce
the incidence of drug induced dyskinesias or at the least delay their onset.[5, 98] Patients
who can tolerate the dopamine agonist drugs are started on these agents first and titrated
to an effective dose. Sinemet (carbidopa/levodopa) is then added later in the course of
the disease. This strategy has been recently shown to reduce motor fluctuations as well
as levodopa induced dyskinesias.[99] Either dopamine agonist monotherapy titrated to
an effective dose, or agonist therapy with the addition of Sinemet or Sinemet CR is
acceptable. It is important to note that the CR preparation only delivers 75-80% of the
same dose of dopamine as the regular release preparation, and may worsen motor
fluctuations, levodopa induced dyskinesias, and dystonia later in the illness. Some
patients, particularly the elderly who are falling may do better with Sinemet monotherapy
14
initially, which is generally more efficacious, acts more quickly to relieve symptoms, and
may be easier to manage.
Carbidopa/Levodopa. Also known as Sinemet, carbidopa/levodopa is a
combination of the dopamine decarboxylase inhibitor carbidopa, and levodopa. It is
available as a short acting preparation as 10/100, 25/100, 25/250 tablets and as a long
acting preparation known as Sinemet CR which may come as 25/100 or 50/200 tablets.
When using Sinemet one should use the smallest dose necessary to control symptoms, in
order to minimize potential fluctuations and LIDS. The strategy we use in our practice is
to start with the 25/100 tablets (regular release) and use ½ of a tablet two to three times a
day titrating up as needed. Most patients will need at least 300-400 mg of levodopa,
particularly early in the disease although there are great variations between individuals.
Nausea may complicate a patient’s attempt to get on dopaminergic therapy. The addition
of extra carbidopa (Lodosyn), which is a peripheral dopamine decarboxylase inhibitor, or
ginger (ginger root, gingerale) may lessen or eliminate this phenomenon. In early PD,
medications may be taken with food to lessen nausea, but as the disease progresses it may
become important to take them on an empty stomach to ensure a regular absorption rate,
and consideration should be given to reducing protein in the diet which can also slow the
absorption of Sinemet.
When patients experience motor fluctuations, dystonia, or dyskinesia different strategies
should be employed to treat each of these individual problems. (Tables 2,3) In general,
patients who are wearing off prior to their next dose may benefit from moving dosing
intervals closer together, and by adding additional doses of medication. Individual
dosages may need to be decreased to lessen dyskinesia.
15
Dopamine Agonists. Adding a dopamine agonist as early as possible in PD is
now the treatment of choice in order to lessen long term complications of domaminergic
therapy.[99] Most patients will need to add Sinemet later in the course of the disease.
When beginning dopamine agonist therapy one may choose from pergolide (Permax),
bromocriptine (Parlodel), pramipexole (Mirapex), and ropinerole (Requip). With the
exception of Parlodel, which may be less effective, the other agonists all have similar
efficacies and similar mechanisms of action with the exception that pergolide has D1 and
D2 agonist properties, and the others are more D2, D3 agonists. If one preparation does
not provide adequate benefits or introduces unacceptable side effects, we will switch to
another. The most important principle in using a dopamine agonist is to start at low
doses and titrate upward slowly. Pergolide may be started at a dose of .05mg a day and
titrated slowly to a dose of 1mg three times a day or higher. Mirapex is started at .125mg
and titrated to 1.5mg three or more times a day, and ropinerole is started at .25 mg a day
and titrated to a maximum of 24mg/day in 3 or more divided doses. Bromocriptine, an
older ergot derivative medication (the others are nonergot derivatives), may be started at
2.5 mg twice a day and titrated to at least 5mg three times a day, but often titrations to
20-30 mg/day are required. These medications may be given more than two or three
times a day later in the illness. The doses may need to be reduced if patients experience
nausea, dyskinesia, hallucinations, sleep attacks, or other complications of therapy.
COMT Inhibitors. Two enzymes, monoamine oxidase B and catechol-o-
methyltransferase metabolize dopamine. By blocking or preventing the metabolism of
dopamine either of these compounds may extend its duration of action and alleviate the
wearing off phenomenon in PD. COMT inhibitors, more than MAO-B inhibitors are
16
very useful for preventing wearing off phenomenon and sometimes in diminishing
dyskinesia, if the levodopa dose can be decreased after initiation of therapy (otherwise it
may induce dyskinesia). There are two COMT inhibitors on the market, tolcapone or
Tasmar, and entacapone, or Comtan. Although more efficacious, the use of Tolcapone
(100mg two to three times a day) has been limited as a result of a few cases of liver
failure. If tolcapone is utilized, liver enzymes need to be monitored every 2-4 weeks.
The less efficacious, but safer entacapone can be particularly helpful in treating the
wearing off phenomenon. Entacapone is started at a dose of 200mg and taken one to six
times a day. It must be taken with Sinemet, as it has no effect when taken in
monotherapy. Entacapone may induce dyskinesia within 24-48 hours of initiating
therapy, and treatment of the dyskinesia should be directed at immediately decreasing the
dose of Sinemet by 10-30%. Some physicians advocate decreasing Sinemet doses
concomitant with starting entacapone therapy. Patients need to be warned that a harmless
metabolite of entacapone may cause an orange discoloration of the urine.
Amantadine. The multiple mechanisms of action of amantadine make it a
potentially useful drug for treatment of many of the symptoms of PD. Originally used as
an antiviral in the treatment of flu, amantadine is also a partial dopamine agonist,
decreases dopamine reuptake, is anticholinergic, and has some antiglutamatergic
properties.[100, 101] There are ongoing studies to determine if amantadine has
neuroprotective properties. Presumably through its antiglutamatergic properties
amantadine can be a powerful anti-dyskinesia medication as well as potentially helpful in
the treatment of motor fluctuations. Amantadine can be used early in PD for the
treatment of mild PD symptoms prior to levodopa therapy, or late in the disease to treat
17
dyskinesia. The dose ranges are 100mg one to four times a day. Practitioners should be
cautious with amantadine as it may cause rash (livido reticularis), or hallucinations.
Smaller doses can be administered through a liquid preparation. When complications are
encountered with this medication, the dose should be reduced or the medicine
discontinued.
Anticholinergics. The use of anticholinergic drugs may have significant benefits
in tremor, bradykinesia, and rigidity in some patients, but its most striking effect is its
benefit on tremor. Young patients presenting with only tremor, may benefit from a trial
of one of many anticholinergic medications. Caution should be exercised as escalating
doses may cause mental confusion, blurred vision, dry mouth, urinary retention, and
memory disturbances. These medications should be used cautiously in the elderly. We
have found that ethopropazine hydrochloride (Parsitan) is the easiest to tolerate. We
generally start patients at 25mg once or twice a day and titrate slowly over many weeks
to benefit and/or side effects. Trihexyphenidyl (Artane) and benztropine mesylate
(Cogentin) may also be tried. A small dose before bedtime of the anticholinergic
tolterodine (Detrol) may be useful for patients with urinary urgency that severely disrupts
their sleep cycle.
Antipsychotics. Patients with PD are thought to be prone to hallucinations and
psychosis because of degenerative changes in the cortex, and cross stimulation of D2, D3,
and D4 receptors by dopaminergic drugs.[102] Hallucinations should be treated only if
they are bothersome or disruptive to the patient. Care should be taken to reduce
medication dosages when possible. The addition of selective (D3,D4) dopamine blockers
such as Quetiapine (Seroquel) have added an important dimension to treatment of PD.
18
Selective dopamine blockers may allow higher doses of levodopa needed for
symptomatic treatment of PD, while blocking receptors responsible for the development
of hallucinations and other behavioral manifestations. Quetiapine is the easiest to
administer and is usually the first line of therapy. It has the added benefit of increasing
the amount of restful sleep. Clozapine (Clozaril) is the most efficacious drug, but its use
is limited by weekly screening of the white blood cell count for agranulocytosis.
Olanzapine (Zyprexa), risperadone (Risperdal), and other atypical antipyschotics may not
be effective and may worsen PD motor symptoms. Neuroleptics such as haloperidol
(Haldol) are contraindicated in PD because of their nonselective action on dopamine
receptors.
Antidepressants. Patients with PD experience a high rate of depression (25-
40%).[86, 103] Adequate treatment may be as simple as dopamine replacement or
dopamine agonist therapy. We have found rates of depression in patients with PD
approach 50% and may be significantly higher in later stages of disease. Treatment with
any of the serotonin reuptake inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants, stimulants, or other
novel antidepressants may quickly improve energy and quality of life.[103-105] Patients
should be considered for antidepressant therapy who relay a history of decreased energy
or decreased enjoyment in life.
Treatment of Pain, Dystonia, and Sensory Disturbances. Some PD patients
may present with complaints of pain or a sensory disturbance. Often patients will note a
numbness, tingling, or pain on the side of their initial symptoms. This may lead to
orthopedic procedures without improvement. The pain and sensory symptoms in PD are
usually associated with the off drug state and can be improved by adding or increasing
19
dopamine or dopamine agonists. The PD patient with unexplainable pain should not be
labeled as “drug-seeking.” If adjustment in medications does not alleviate symptoms the
patient may require anti-inflammatories, muscle relaxants, and/or narcotics.
Treatment of Postural Hypotension and Sialorrhea. If hydration or high leg
stockings are ineffective in treatment of postural hypotension (symptomatic dizziness or
lightheadedness especially when standing) the administration of an alpha agonist
(midodrine or florinef) should be employed. Patients should be asked to drink 6-8
glasses of water a day in order to stay well hydrated, improve gait, treat orthostatic
symptoms, and combat constipation. Patients may also complain of drooling or excessive
salivation. This condition is usually not due to autonomic failure, but rather to a decrease
in swallowing. This can be treated with mild anticholinergics (e.g. levsin), dopamine,
dopamine agonists, amantadine, and/or patient education.[1, 68]
Treatment of Dystonia. Pain may be due to dystonia. It most often appears late
in the course of disease during “off” drug states . It is important to keep in mind that
young-onset patients often present with dystonia. Dystonia, which is an abnormal
contraction of agonist and antagonist muscles leading to discomfort, pain, and abnormal
postures may occur at rest, but is usually worsened with movement. It may overflow to
involve other body parts. Treatment is with dopamine or dopamine agonist drugs.
Although dystonia is more common in the off state, it may also occur on dopaminergic
therapy. In such cases a lowering of the dose of medication or altering the dosing
schedule may be necessary to alleviate this symptom. In most cases of PD, it occurs most
commonly in the early morning when the patient may awaken in pain because
medications have worn off overnight.[5, 68, 106]
20
Treatment of Sleep. Common among patients with PD is REM behavioral
disorder (RBD), which consists of the combination of vivid dreaming, and the acting out
of dreams. This problem can be treated effectively with a low bedtime dose of
clonazepam (Klonopin) or other benzodiazepines titrated to efficacy. Restless legs and
periodic limb movements of sleep can be treated with dopamine agonists, dopamine,
benzodiazepines, gabapentin (Neurontin), or analgesics. The PD patient who has
fragmentation of the sleep-wake cycle, and sleep disturbances that are not easily treated
by medications should be referred to a sleep specialist for a sleep study.
Surgical Therapies for PD
When motor symptoms can no longer be controlled by medication patients should
be considered as possible surgical candidates.[68, 107-109] A rigorous screening process
(Table 4) should be undertaken including a confirmation of the diagnosis, and most
importantly documentation of a good response to levodopa, since this is a good
prognostic indicator for patients considering surgery.[68, 107, 108] Although there are
some exceptions, notably tremor, if a patient’s symptoms do not respond to medical
therapy they are unlikely to respond to surgery. Frail elderly patients who are late in the
course of the disease with significant comorbidities are not considered good surgical
candidates. Patients with cognitive dysfunction also tend to do poorly with surgery.
Surgical options include ablative procedures (thalamotomy, pallidotomy,
subthalamotomy), and deep brain stimulation (DBS) (thalamic, pallidal, subthalamic).
Neural transplantation remains experimental and is only available at this time for patients
participating in clinical trials. Initial trials to replace dopaminergic neurons with
autologous adrenal transplants benefited some patients but did not offer enough
21
improvement for the procedure to become routine.[110-112] Fetal cell transplants in
humans resulted in improved bradykinesia and rigidity without an effect on tremor and
freezing. Some patients developed severe and extremely difficult to treat “runaway”
dyskinesias, even off medications.[113, 114] Clinical trials for transplant in PD currently
include patients with advanced disease. Future studies may involve gene therapy using
trophic factors such as nerve growth factor (NGF) to promote repair and sprouting of
nigral neurons. Also, there will likely be transplantation of different dopaminergic
producing cells, tissues, or stem cells to replace lost dopaminergic neurons in the
substantia nigra. These studies are in the early stages of development, and whether or not
they will prove effective in treating PD remains to be demonstrated.
Thalamotomy
Thalamotomy although effective for ET and PD tremor is no longer considered a
first line surgical option for the treatment of PD. Thalamic lesions have not been
demonstrated effective for bradykinesia, freezing, postural instability, or gait disorders
seen in PD.[115, 116] Thalamic lesions placed in the cerebellar receiving area, the
ventralis intermedius (Vim) nucleus are effective in alleviating parkinsonian tremor.[68,
115, 117] If the lesion is extended more anteriorly to include the basal ganglia receiving
areas, ventralis oralis posterior, and ventralis oralis anterior (Vop and Voa), it may
improve rigidity and levodopa induced dyskinesias. Bilateral thalamotomy is not
generally recommended because of the unacceptably high incidence of speech problems
including aphasia, dysarthria, and hypophonia.[118-121] The incidence of speech
deficits associated with bilateral thalamotomy has been reported to vary from 30-
50%.[118-121]
22
Pallidotomy
Pallidotomy is effective for all the major motor manifestations of PD including
tremor, bradykinesia, rigidity, motor fluctuations, levodopa induced dyskinesias, and
dystonia.[69, 122-124] Benefit to axial symptoms including gait, balance, and freezing
problems, following unilateral pallidotomy has been less consistent and may wane over
months to years. Although some patients axial symptoms may show long term benefit
following unilateral pallidotomy, consistent benefit for axial symptoms likely requires a
bilateral procedure. Bilateral pallidotomy, however has been associated with a high risk
of hypophonia[107, 125-128], therefore DBS of the GPi or STN should be used on the
side contralateral to the pallidotomy. Cognitive changes following pallidotomy have
occurred when lesions encroach into the anteromedial nonmotor portions of GPi. The
effects of such lesions may be significant in some cases.[123, 124, 129-131]
Two common reasons for failure of patients to improve following pallidotomy
include 1) misdiagnosis (idiopathic PD is not present), or 2) lesions are placed outside of
sensorimotor GPi. A patient with a partial or transient benefit, may only have a partial
lesion of the sensorimotor GPi. Lesion location in sensorimotor GPi has been shown to
correlate with improvement in clinical symptoms.[68, 123, 132] Alternative approaches
with the gamma knife for PD have led to a high incidence of side effects due to a
combination of problems with patient selection, targeting difficulties and delayed
complications due to radiation effects.[133]
Deep Brain Stimulation
Deep brain stimlation (DBS) with implantable electrodes is a newer procedure
often used in place of or in conjunction with ablative procedures. Activation of the
23
electrodes is achieved by an implantable programmable pulse generator that is placed
below the clavicle. The pulse generator is connected to the DBS electrode by an
attachment wire that travels across the posterior aspect of the neck and skull.
The mechanism of DBS remains unknown. DBS may act by reversibly
suppressing or normalizing neuronal activity through the activation of inhibitory
interneurons. Alternatively, depolarization block, interruption of bursting, or normalizing
irregular and abnormally bursting patterns may all serve as possible mechanisms.[109,
134-136]. Three targets are in use for the treatment of PD with DBS (VIM nucleus of the
thalamus, globus pallidus internal segment, and subthalamic nucleus). The procedure is
costly, and there are risks including lead fractures, infections, premature battery failure,
and the need for frequent reprogramming.[137, 138] Advantages of the DBS system
include the ability to perform bilateral procedures without speech side effects, reversible
effects of stimulation, and the ability to optimize the stimulation parameters for increased
benefit.
Thalamic DBS is now FDA approved for tremor in the United States. Thalamic
DBS, like thalamotomy is effective in the treatment of PD tremor, but since additional
motor symptoms are not treated effectively, GPi or STN DBS, should be employed.
Procedures can be performed staged or simultaneously. Axial symptometology including
gait usually require a bilateral procedure.[109, 139] Although STN DBS has been
advocated for midline symptoms and GPi DBS for dyskinesias,[109, 140] both
procedures are effective in treating the cardinal motor signs of PD and both may allow
reduction of dosing of antiparkinson medications (Vitek, unpublished observations).[141,
142] Some groups have also advocated the dosages may be reduced more with STN
24
stimulation than GPi stimulation, and that STN stimulation provides greater improvement
in motor symptoms compared to GPi, however there is little data to support this
argument.[109, 140] In the only study to date that has reandomized patients to one state
or the other results were comparable.[143] Further studies are needed to corroborate this
observation, and to determine the potential advantages of one site over another.
Future Directions
As our knowledge of the pathophysiology, genetics, and molecular biology of PD
expand future directions for treatment will include new and better medical compounds,
improved surgical and transplantation techniques, neuroprotection, and perhaps new
technologies such as gene therapy and the use of stem cells to restore function.
Familiarity of the current treatment options and research directions in PD is important for
all physicians encountering these patients in order to optimize their care, increase quality
of life, and to continue to provide new hope for the future.
25
Figure 1.
GPe = globus pallidus, external segment; SNC = substantia nigra, pars compacta; TH = Thalamus; VLo =
ventrolateral nucleus; STN = subthalamic nucleus; GPi = globus pallidus, internal segment; SNr =
substantia nigra, pars reticulata.; Rt= Reticular thalamic nucleus
26
Clues Useful in Defining Parkinson’s Like Syndromes Syndrome: Clues to Diagnosis Corticobasal Degeneration Ideomotor apraxia, cortical sensory loss, dementia Lewy Body Disease Early hallucinations, dementia, paradoxical worsening with medications Progressive Supranuclear Palsy Vertical gaze palsy, early gait and balance
problems, axial rigidity, dementia Multiple Systems Atrophy Severe autonomic disturbance, (including OPCA1, SDS2, orthostatic hypotension, cerebellar signs, SND3) postural action tremor only 1 OPCA- olivopontocerebellar atrophy 2 SDS- Shy Drager Syndrome 3 SND- Striatoniagral Degeneration
Table 1
27
Motor Fluctuations in PD Symptom Possible Strategies to Treat End of Dose Wearing Off Alter dosing schedule (move levodopa/agonist doses closer) Sustained release preparation (CR) Addition of an agonist or levodopa Addition of a COMT, (Entacapone) Freezing Increase levodopa or agonist Rare case of “on” freezing may need to reduce levodopa Use dopamine agonists in addition to levodopa Have patient count out loud/march in place Visual cues: laser pointer, inverted cane Unpredictable“ Off” Periods Increase agonist or levodopa Liquid sinemet or lisuride infusions Apomorphine injections Delayed Onset of Drug Administer 2 hours prior to meals Avoid high protein meals Crush sinemet and put in a carbonated or acidic drink Search and treat GI motility disorder
Table 2
28
Dyskinesias and Dystonia in PD Type of Dyskinesia Possible Treatment Strategies Peak Dose Dyskinesia Reduce levodopa, change dosing intervals Add dopamine agonist and reduce levodopa Addition of amantadine Diphasic Dyskinesia Change dosing intervals (change peaks/nadirs) (both before and after peak dose) Adjust levodopa dose Add an agonist Consider surgery Early AM Dystonia (Off Dystonia) Dose of CR at bedtime Dose of levodopa in early AM prior to arising Dopamine agonist Occasionally baclofen or anticholinergic Yo-Yo-ing (Continous fluctuations) Dopamine agonists Liquid sinemet with frequent doses Surgery Myoclonus Treat only if bothersome Benzodiazepine (Clonazepam) Adjust levodopa or agonist dose Check to see if on an SSRI “Off” Dystonia” Increase levodopa Increase agonist Consider anticholinergic or relaxant Consider botulinum toxin Orofacial Dyskinesia Decrease levodopa or agonist Atypical antipsychotic Anticholinergic
Table 3
29
Factors that Should be Considered Prior to PD Surgery that may Contribute to Poor Outcome
Age Comorbidities Cognitive decline Hallucinations Poor Response to levodopa Not idiopathic PD (e.g. Parkinson’s plus syndrome) A particular symptom important to the patient is levodopa unresponsive; (with the notable exception of tremor) Emotionally unstable patient Patient with unrealistic expectations of surgery Severe cerebral atrophy or increased ventricular size
Table 4
30
References
1. Olanow, C.W. and W.C. Koller, An algorithm (decision tree) for the
management of Parkinson's disease: treatment guidelines.American Academy
of Neurology. Neurology, 1998. 50(3 Suppl 3): p. S1-57.
2. Tanner, C.M., et al., Parkinson disease in twins: an etiologic study [see
comments]. JAMA, 1999. 281(4): p. 341-6.
3. Schapira, A.H., Science, medicine, and the future: Parkinson's disease. BMJ,
1999. 318(7179): p. 311-4.
4. Tanner, C.M., Thelen J.A., Offord, K.P., et al., Parkinson's Disease incidence
in Olmstead county, MN: 1935-1938. Neurology, 1992. 42(Suppl 3): p. 194.
5. Olanow, C.W., RL. Koller WC., An alorithim (decision tree) for the
management of Parkinson's Disease (2001): Treatment guidelines. Neurology,
2001. 56(11, supplement 5): p. S52-S53.
6. Parkinson, J., An essay on the Shaking Palsy. 1817, London: Sherwood,
Neely, and Jones.
7. Pryse-Philips, W., Companion to Clinical Neurology. 1995, Boston: Little
Brown and Company.
8. Schapira, A.H., et al., Mitochondria in the etiology and pathogenesis of
Parkinson's disease. Annals of Neurology, 1998. 44(3 Suppl 1): p. S89-98.
9. Ambani, L.M., M.H. Van Woert, and S. Murphy, Brain peroxidase and
catalase in Parkinson disease. Arch Neurol, 1975. 32(2): p. 114-8.
31
10. Blandini, F., J.T. Greenamyre, and G. Nappi, The role of glutamate in the
pathophysiology of Parkinson's disease. Funct Neurol, 1996. 11(1): p. 3-15.
11. Cooper, J.M. and A.H. Schapira, Mitochondrial dysfunction in
neurodegeneration. J Bioenerg Biomembr, 1997. 29(2): p. 175-83.
12. Marttila, R.J., H. Lorentz, and U.K. Rinne, Oxygen toxicity protecting
enzymes in Parkinson's disease. Increase of superoxide dismutase-like activity
in the substantia nigra and basal nucleus. J Neurol Sci, 1988. 86(2-3): p. 321-
31.
13. Marsden, C.D. and C.W. Olanow, The causes of Parkinson's disease are being
unraveled and rational neuroprotective therapy is close to reality. Ann Neurol,
1998. 44(3 Suppl 1): p. S189-96.
14. Owen, A.D., et al., Oxidative stress and Parkinson's disease. Ann N Y Acad
Sci, 1996. 786: p. 217-23.
15. Seaton, T.A., J.M. Cooper, and A.H. Schapira, Free radical scavengers protect
dopaminergic cell lines from apoptosis induced by complex I inhibitors. Brain
Res, 1997. 777(1-2): p. 110-8.
16. Zhang, J., et al., Secondary excitotoxicity contributes to dopamine-induced
apoptosis of dopaminergic neuronal cultures. Biochem Biophys Res Commun,
1998. 248(3): p. 812-6.
17. Marsden, C.D. and C.W. Olanow, The causes of Parkinson's disease are being
unraveled and rational neuroprotective therapy is close to reality. Annals of
Neurology, 1998. 44(3 Suppl 1): p. S189-96.
32
18. Doble, A., Excitatory amino acid receptors and neurodegeneration. Therapie,
1995. 50(4): p. 319-37.
19. Hirsch, E.C.P., et al., Glial Cells and Inflammation in Parkinson's Disease: A
Role in Neurodegeneration? [Miscellaneous Article]. Annals of Neurology Cell
Death and Neuroprotection in Parkinson's Disease. September, 1998.
44(3)(Supplement 1): p. S115-S120.
20. Saggu, H., et al., A selective increase in particulate superoxide dismutase
activity in parkinsonian substantia nigra. J Neurochem, 1989. 53(3): p. 692-7.
21. Sian, J., et al., Alterations in glutathione levels in Parkinson's disease and
other neurodegenerative disorders affecting basal ganglia. Ann Neurol, 1994.
36(3): p. 348-55.
22. Sian, J., et al., Glutathione-related enzymes in brain in Parkinson's disease.
Ann Neurol, 1994. 36(3): p. 356-61.
23. Schapira, A.H., Pathogenesis of Parkinson's disease. Baillieres Clin Neurol,
1997. 6(1): p. 15-36.
24. Schapira, A.H., Mitochondrial DNA in Parkinson's disease. Adv Neurol, 1999.
80: p. 233-7.
25. Greenamyre, J.T., et al., Response: Parkinson's disease, pesticides and
mitochondrial dysfunction. Trends Neurosci, 2001. 24(5): p. 247.
26. Greenamyre, J.T., et al., Mitochondrial dysfunction in Parkinson's disease.
Biochem Soc Symp, 1999. 66: p. 85-97.
27. Langston, J.W., et al., Chronic Parkinsonism in humans due to a product of
meperidine-analog synthesis. Science, 1983. 219(4587): p. 979-80.
33
28. Alexander, G.E., M.D. Crutcher, and M.R. DeLong,, Basal ganglia-
thalamocortical circuits: parallel substrates for motor, oculomotor,
"prefrontal" and "limbic" functions, in Progress in, in Brain Research,, e.a.
H.B.M. Uylings, Editor. 1990, Elsevier Science Publishers: New York.
29. Albin, R.L., A.B. Young, and J.B. Penney, The functional anatomy of basal
ganglia disorders. [see comments]. Trends in Neurosciences, 1989. 12(10): p.
366-75.
30. Rajput, A.H., et al., Epidemiology of parkinsonism: incidence, classification,
and mortality. Annals of Neurology, 1984. 16(3): p. 278-82.
31. Mjones, H., Paralysis Agitans: A clinical and genetic study. Acta Psychiatr
Neurol, 1949. 25(suppl 54): p. 1-195.
32. Riess, O., W. Kuhn, and R. Kruger, Genetic influence on the development of
Parkinson's disease. Journal of Neurology, 2000. 247 Suppl 2: p. II69-74.
33. Polymeropoulos, M.H., et al., Mutation in the alpha-synuclein gene identified
in families with Parkinson's disease [see comments]. Science, 1997. 276(5321):
p. 2045-7.
34. Kruger, R., et al., Ala30Pro mutation in the gene encoding alpha-synuclein in
Parkinson's disease [letter]. Nature Genetics, 1998. 18(2): p. 106-8.
35. Kruger, R., et al., Increased susceptibility to sporadic Parkinson's disease by a
certain combined alpha-synuclein/apolipoprotein E genotype. Annals of
Neurology, 1999. 45(5): p. 611-7.
34
36. Alexander, G.E., M.D. Crutcher, and M.R. DeLong, Basal ganglia-
thalamocortical circuits: parallel substrates for motor, oculomotor,
"prefrontal" and "limbic" functions. Prog Brain Res, 1990. 85: p. 119-46.
37. Alexander, G.E., M.R. DeLong, and P.L. Strick, Parallel organization of
functionally segregated circuits linking basal ganglia and cortex. Annu Rev
Neurosci, 1986. 9: p. 357-81.
38. Hazrati, L., Parent, A., Projection from the xternal pallidum to the reticular
thalamic nucleus in the squirrel monkey. Brain, 1991(550): p. 132-146.
39. De Vito, J., Anderson, ME., An autoradiographic study of the efferent
connections of the globus pallidus in macaca mullata. Brain Res, 1982(46): p.
107-117.
40. Ilinsky, I., Kultas-Ilinski, K., Sagittal cytoarcitectonic maps of the macca
mulatta thalamus with a revised nomenclature of the motor realted nuclei
validated by observations on their connectivity. J Comp Neurol, 1987(262): p.
331-364.
41. Asanuma, C., Thatch, WT., Jones, EG., Cytoarchitectonic delineation of the
ventral lateral thalamic region in the monkey. Brain Res Rev., 1983(5): p. 219-
235.
42. Darian-Smith, C., Darian-Smith, I., Cheema, SS., Thalamic projections to
sensorimotor cortex in the macaque monkey: Use of multiple retrograde
fluorescent tracers. J Comp Neurol, 1990(299): p. 17-46.
43. Schell, G.S., PL., The origin of thalamic inputs to the arcuate premotor and
supplementary motor areas. J Neurosci, 1984(4): p. 539-560.
35
44. Jones, E.D., Coulter, JD., Burton, H., Porter, R., Cells of origin and terminal
distribution of corticostriatal fibers arising in the sensori-motor cortex of
monkeys. J Comp Neurol, 1977(4): p. 539-56o.
45. Ilinisky, I., Jouandet, ML., Goldman-Rakic, P.S., Organization of the
nigrothalamocortical system in the rhesus monkey. J Comp Neurol, 1985(236):
p. 315-330.
46. Harnois, C., Filion, M., Pallidofugal projections to the thalamus and midbrain:
A quantitative antidromic activation study in monkeys and cats. Exp Brain Res,
1982(47): p. 277-285.
47. Parent, A., DeBellefeuille, L., Organization of efferent projections from the
internal segment of the globus pallidus in primate as revealed by fluorescence
retrograde labeling method. Brain Res, 1982(245): p. 201-213.
48. DeLong, M.R., Primate models of movement disorders of basal ganglia origin.
Trends in Neurosciences, 1990. 13(7): p. 281-5.
49. Delong, M.R., et al., Functional organization of the basal ganglia:
contributions of single- cell recording studies. Ciba Found Symp, 1984. 107: p.
64-82.
50. Hassler, R., Mundinger, F., Riechert, T., Stereotaxis in Parkinsonian
Sydromes. 1979, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
51. Narabayashi, H., Yokochi, F., Nakajima, Y., L-dopa Induced Dyskinesia and
Thalamotomy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 1984(47): p. 831-839.
52. Crossman, A.R., A hypothesis on the pathophysiological mechanisms that
underlie levodopa- or dopamine agonist-induced dyskinesia in Parkinson's
36
disease: implications for future strategies in treatment. Mov Disord, 1990. 5(2):
p. 100-8.
53. Merello, M., et al., Confirmation of the antidyskinetic effect of posteroventral
pallidotomy by means of an intraoperative apomorphine test. Mov Disord,
1998. 13(3): p. 533-5.
54. Hutchison, W., et al., Altered activity of globus pallidus (GP) neurons in
dystonia. Society for Neuroscience 27th Annual Meeting Abstracts, New
Orleans, Louisiana, 1997. 23(1): p. 471 (Abstract #183.7).
55. Grafton, S.T., et al., Pallidotomy increases activity of motor association cortex
in Parkinson's disease: a positron emission tomographic study. Annals of
Neurology, 1995. 37(6): p. 776-83.
56. Ceballos-Baumann, A.O., Obeso, JA., Vitek, JL., et al., Restoration of
thaloamocortical activity after posteroventral pallidotomy in Parkinson's
Disease. Lancet, 1994(344): p. 814.
57. Zhang, J., et al., The effect of GPe lesions on GPi cell activity and motor
behavior in the MPTP treated monkey. Society for Neuroscience Abstract,
1997. 23(1): p. 542.
58. Baron, M.S., et al., Treatment of advanced Parkinson's disease by posterior
GPi pallidotomy: 1-year results of a pilot study. Ann Neurol, 1996. 40(3): p.
355-66.
59. Narabayashi, H., Tremor Mechanisms, ed. G. Schaltenbrand, Walker, A.E.
1982, Stuttgart: Thieme. 510-514.
37
60. Vitek, J.L., J. Ashe, and Y. Kaneoke, Spontaneous neuronal activity in the
motor thalamus: Alteration in pattern and rate in parkinsonism., in #237.4.
1994: Neuroscience,. p. p. 561.
61. Kaneoke, Y., Vitek JL., The motor thalamus in the parkinsonian primate:
enhanced burst and oscillatory activities. Soc Neurosci, 1995. 21(part 2): p.
1428.
62. Vitek, J.L. and M. Giroux, Physiology of hypokinetic and hyperkinetic
movement disorders: model for dyskinesia. Ann Neurol, 2000. 47(4 Suppl 1): p.
S131-40.
63. Lee, M.S., J.O. Rinne, and C.D. Marsden, The pedunculopontine nucleus: its
role in the genesis of movement disorders. Yonsei Med J, 2000. 41(2): p. 167-
84.
64. Pahapill, P.A. and A.M. Lozano, The pedunculopontine nucleus and
Parkinson's disease. Brain, 2000. 123(Pt 9): p. 1767-83.
65. Munro-Davies, L.E., et al., The role of the pedunculopontine region in basal-
ganglia mechanisms of akinesia. Exp Brain Res, 1999. 129(4): p. 511-7.
66. Zweig, R.M., et al., The pedunculopontine nucleus in Parkinson's disease. Ann
Neurol, 1989. 26(1): p. 41-6.
67. Braak, H. and E. Braak, Pathoanatomy of Parkinson's disease. Journal of
Neurology, 2000. 247 Suppl 2: p. II3-10.
68. Vitek, J., Stereotaxic surgery and deep brain stimulation for movement
disorders, in Movement Disorders, in Neurologic Principles and Practice,
R.W.a.W. Koller, Editor. 1997, McGraw-Hill, Inc.: New York. p. p. 237-255.
38
69. Lozano, A.M., et al., Effect of GPi pallidotomy on motor function in
Parkinson's disease. [see comments]. [erratum appears in Lancet 1996 Oct
19;348(9034):1108]. Lancet, 1995. 346(8987): p. 1383-7.
70. Nestor, P. and J. Hodges, Non-Alzheimer dementias. Semin Neurol, 2000.
20(4): p. 439-46.
71. Galvin, J.E., V.M. Lee, and J.Q. Trojanowski, Synucleinopathies: clinical and
pathological implications. Arch Neurol, 2001. 58(2): p. 186-90.
72. Spillantini, M.G. and M. Goedert, The alpha-synucleinopathies: Parkinson's
disease, dementia with Lewy bodies, and multiple system atrophy. Ann N Y
Acad Sci, 2000. 920: p. 16-27.
73. Galvin, J., V.M. Lee, and J.Q. Trojanowski, Synucleinopathies. Archives of
Neurology, 2000. 58: p. 186-190.
74. Quinn, N., P. Critchley, and C.D. Marsden, Young onset Parkinson's disease.
Mov Disord, 1987. 2(2): p. 73-91.
75. Calne, D.B., Treatment of Parkinson's disease [see comments]. N Engl J Med,
1993. 329(14): p. 1021-7.
76. Gelb, D.J., E. Oliver, and S. Gilman, Diagnostic criteria for Parkinson disease.
Archives of Neurology, 1999. 56(1): p. 33-9.
77. Koller, W.C., When does Parkinson's disease begin? Neurology, 1992. 42(4
Suppl 4): p. 27-31; discussion 41-8.
78. Piccini, P., N. Turjanski, and D.J. Brooks, PET studies of the striatal
dopaminergic system in Parkinson's disease (PD). J Neural Transm Suppl,
1995. 45: p. 123-31.
39
79. Morrish, P.K., G.V. Sawle, and D.J. Brooks, Clinical and [18F] dopa PET
findings in early Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 1995.
59(6): p. 597-600.
80. Farrer, M., et al., A chromosome 4p haplotype segregating with Parkinson's
disease and postural tremor. Hum Mol Genet, 1999. 8(1): p. 81-5.
81. Errea-Abad, J.M. and J.R. Ara-Callizo, [Comparative clinical study of
patients with Parkinson disease and essential tremor]. Rev Neurol, 1998.
27(155): p. 39-43.
82. Jankovic, J., et al., Familial essential tremor in 4 kindreds. Prospects for
genetic mapping. Arch Neurol, 1997. 54(3): p. 289-94.
83. Koller, W.C., et al., Falls and Parkinson's disease. Clin Neuropharmacol,
1989. 12(2): p. 98-105.
84. Ramig, L.O., How effective is the Lee Silverman voice treatment? Asha, 1997.
39(1): p. 34-5.
85. Ramig, L.O., et al., Intensive speech treatment for patients with Parkinson's
disease: short- and long-term comparison of two techniques. Neurology, 1996.
47(6): p. 1496-504.
86. Dooneief, G., et al., An estimate of the incidence of depression in idiopathic
Parkinson's disease. Arch Neurol, 1992. 49(3): p. 305-7.
87. Cummings, J.L. and D.L. Masterman, Depression in patients with Parkinson's
disease. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry, 1999. 14(9): p. 711-8.
88. Starkstein, S.E., et al., Depression in Parkinson's disease. J Nerv Ment Dis,
1990. 178(1): p. 27-31.
40
89. Mayeux, R., et al., Depression and Parkinson's disease. Adv Neurol, 1984. 40:
p. 241-50.
90. Flint, A., Pharmacologic treatment of depression in late life. CMAJ, 1997. 157:
p. 1061-7.
91. Braverman, L., Utiger, R., Introduction to Hypothyroidism. Werner and
Ingbar's, The Thyroid, ed. L. Braverman. 1996, Phildelphia: Lippincott-
Raven. 736-737.
92. Tandeter, H.B. and P. Shvartzman, Parkinson's disease camouflaging early
signs of hypothyroidism. Postgrad Med, 1993. 94(5): p. 187-90.
93. Otake, K., et al., Hypothalamic dysfunction in Parkinson's disease patients.
Acta Med Hung, 1994. 50(1-2): p. 3-13.
94. Berger, J.R. and R.E. Kelley, Thyroid function in Parkinson disease.
Neurology, 1981. 31(1): p. 93-5.
95. Prange, A.J., Jr., Novel uses of thyroid hormones in patients with affective
disorders. Thyroid, 1996. 6(5): p. 537-43.
96. Prange, A.J., Jr., Thyroid axis sustaining hypothesis of posttraumatic stress
disorder. Psychosom Med, 1999. 61(2): p. 139-40.
97. Heinonen, E.H. and U.K. Rinne, Selegiline in the treatment of Parkinson's
disease. Acta Neurol Scand Suppl, 1989. 126: p. 103-11.
98. Olanow, C.W., P. Jenner, and D. Brooks, Dopamine agonists and
neuroprotection in Parkinson's disease. Ann Neurol, 1998. 44(3 Suppl 1): p.
S167-74.
41
99. Rascol, O., et al., A five-year study of the incidence of dyskinesia in patients
with early Parkinson's disease who were treated with ropinirole or levodopa.
056 Study Group. N Engl J Med, 2000. 342(20): p. 1484-91.
100. Metman, L.V., et al., Amantadine for levodopa-induced dyskinesias: a 1-year
follow-up study. Archives of Neurology, 1999. 56(11): p. 1383-6.
101. Stoof, J.C., J. Booij, and B. Drukarch, Amantadine as N-methyl-D-aspartic
acid receptor antagonist: new possibilities for therapeutic applications? Clinical
Neurology & Neurosurgery, 1992. 94 Suppl: p. S4-6.
102. Jankovic, J., Complications and limitations of drug therapy for Parkinson's
disease. Neurology, 2000. 55(12): p. S2-6.
103. Mayeux, R., et al., Depression and Parkinson's disease. Adv Neurol, 1987. 45:
p. 451-5.
104. Driver, P.S., Depression treatment in Parkinson's disease. Dicp, 1991. 25(2): p.
137-8.
105. Karasu, T., Gelenberg, A., Wang, P., et al., Practice for the Treatment of
Patients with Major Depressive Disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry,
2000. 157(4): p. 1-45.
106. Vitek, J.L., et al., GPi pallidotomy for dystonia: clinical outcome and neuronal
activity. Advances in Neurology, 1998. 78: p. 211-9.
107. Obeso, J.A., et al., Surgical treatment of Parkinson's disease. Baillieres Clin
Neurol, 1997. 6(1): p. 125-45.
108. Starr, P.A., J.L. Vitek, and R.A. Bakay, Deep brain stimulation for movement
disorders. Neurosurg Clin N Am, 1998. 9(2): p. 381-402.
42
109. Benabid, A.L., et al., Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus for
Parkinson's disease: methodologic aspects and clinical criteria. Neurology,
2000. 55(12): p. S40-4.
110. Goetz, C.G., et al., Adrenal medullary transplant to the striatum of patients
with advanced Parkinson's disease: 1-year motor and psychomotor data.
Neurology, 1990. 40(2): p. 273-6.
111. Lieberman, A., et al., Adrenal medullary transplants as a treatment for
advanced Parkinson's disease. Acta Neurol Scand Suppl, 1989. 126: p. 189-96.
112. Lopez-Lozano, J.J., M. Mata, and G. Bravo, [Neural transplants en Parkinson
disease: clinical results of 10 years of experience. Group of Neural Transplants
of the CPH]. Rev Neurol, 2000. 30(11): p. 1077-83.
113. Freed, C.R., et al., Transplantation of Embryonic Dopamine Neurons for
Severe Parkinson's Disease. New England Journal of Medicine March 8,
2001. 344(10): p. 710-719.
114. Fahn, S. Double-blind controlled trial of embryonic dopaminergic tissue
transplants in advanced Parkinson's disease. in 6th International Congress of
Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders. 2000. Barcelona, Spain.
115. Tasker, R.R., Ablative therapy for movement disorders. Does thalamotomy alter
the course of Parkinson's disease? Neurosurgery Clinics of North America,
1998. 9(2): p. 375-80.
116. Tasker, R.R., Deep brain stimulation is preferable to thalamotomy for tremor
suppression. Surgical Neurology, 1998. 49(2): p. 145-53; discussion 153-4.
43
117. Koller, W.C., et al., Deep brain stimulation of the Vim nucleus of the thalamus
for the treatment of tremor. Neurology, 2000. 55(12 Suppl 6): p. S29-33.
118. Herrera, E.J., et al., Posteroventral pallidotomy in Parkinson's disease. Acta
Neurochir, 2000. 142(2): p. 169-75.
119. Iacono, R.P., R.R. Lonser, and S. Kuniyoshi, Unilateral versus bilateral
simultaneous posteroventral pallidotomy in subgroups of patients with
Parkinson's disease. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg, 1995. 65(1-4): p. 6-9.
120. Petrovici, J.N., Speech disturbances following stereotaxic surgery in
ventrolateral thalamus. Neurosurg Rev, 1980. 3(3): p. 189-95.
121. Rossitch, E., Jr., et al., Evaluation of memory and language function pre- and
postthalamotomy with an attempt to define those patients at risk for
postoperative dysfunction. Surg Neurol, 1988. 29(1): p. 11-6.
122. Baron, M.S., et al., Treatment of advanced Parkinson's disease by posterior
GPi pallidotomy: 1-year results of a pilot study. [see comments]. Annals of
Neurology, 1996. 40(3): p. 355-66.
123. Vitek, J.L., et al., Microelectrode-guided pallidotomy: technical approach and
its application in medically intractable Parkinson's disease. [see comments].
Journal of Neurosurgery, 1998. 88(6): p. 1027-43.
124. Vitek, J.L., et al., Neuronal activity in the basal ganglia in patients with
generalized dystonia and hemiballismus. Annals of Neurology, 1999. 46(1): p.
22-35.
44
125. Schulz, G.M., et al., Voice and speech characteristics of persons with
Parkinson's disease pre- and post-pallidotomy surgery: preliminary findings. J
Speech Lang Hear Res, 1999. 42(5): p. 1176-94.
126. Schulz, G.M., M. Greer, and W. Friedman, Changes in vocal intensity in
Parkinson's disease following pallidotomy surgery. J Voice, 2000. 14(4): p.
589-606.
127. Ghika, J., et al., Efficiency and safety of bilateral contemporaneous pallidal
stimulation (deep brain stimulation) in levodopa-responsive patients with
Parkinson's disease with severe motor fluctuations: a 2-year follow-up review. J
Neurosurg, 1998. 89(5): p. 713-8.
128. Koller, W.C., et al., Surgical treatment of Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Sci,
1999. 167(1): p. 1-10.
129. Cahn, D.A., et al., Neuropsychological and motor functioning after unilateral
anatomically guided posterior ventral pallidotomy. Preoperative performance
and three-month follow-up. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol,
1998. 11(3): p. 136-45.
130. Trepanier, L.L., et al., Neuropsychological consequences of posteroventral
pallidotomy for the treatment of Parkinson's disease. Neurology, 1998. 51(1): p.
207-15.
131. York, M.K., H.S. Levin, and R.G. Grossman, Pallidotomy and psychological
outcomes. J Neurosurg, 2001. 94(5): p. 866-8.
45
132. Eskandar, E.N., et al., Stereotactic pallidotomy performed without using
microelectrode guidance in patients with Parkinson's disease: surgical
technique and 2-year results. Journal of Neurosurgery, 2000. 92(3): p. 375-83.
133. Okun, M., Stover NP., Subramanian, T., Complications of Gamma Knife
Surgery for Parkinson's Disease. Archives of Neurology, 2001. In Press.
134. Dostrovsky, J.O., et al., Microstimulation-induced inhibition of neuronal firing
in human globus pallidus. J Neurophysiol, 2000. 84(1): p. 570-4.
135. Montgomery, E.B., Jr. and K.B. Baker, Mechanisms of deep brain stimulation
and future technical developments. Neurol Res, 2000. 22(3): p. 259-66.
136. Benazzouz, A. and M. Hallett, Mechanism of action of deep brain stimulation.
Neurology, 2000. 55(12): p. S13-6.
137. Kumar, R., et al., Deep brain stimulation of the globus pallidus pars interna in
advanced Parkinson's disease. Neurology, 2000. 55(12): p. S34-9.
138. Volkmann, J., et al., Safety and efficacy of pallidal or subthalamic nucleus
stimulation in advanced PD. Neurology, 2001. 56(4): p. 548-51.
139. Brown, R.G., et al., Impact of deep brain stimulation on upper limb akinesia in
Parkinson's disease. Ann Neurol, 1999. 45(4): p. 473-88.
140. Benabid, A.L., et al., Acute and long-term effects of subthalamic nucleus
stimulation in Parkinson's disease. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg, 1994. 62(1-4):
p. 76-84.
141. Burchiel, K.J., et al., Comparison of pallidal and subthalamic nucleus deep
brain stiumlation for advanced Parkinson's disease: results of a randomized,
blinded pilot study. Nuerosurgery, 1999. 45(6): p. 1375-84.
46
142. Krause, M., et al., Deep brain stiulation for the treatment of Parkinson's
disease: subthalamic nucleus versusu globus pallidus internus. Journal of
Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 2001. 70(4): p. 464-70.
143. Burchiel, K.J., et al., Comparison of pallidal and subthalamic nucleus deep
brain stimulation for advanced Parkinson's disease: results of a randomized,
blinded pilot study. Neurosurgery, 1999. 45(6): p. 1375-82; discussion 1382-4.