part 2 ‐ isco - newmoa · 2009 persulfate injection • focus on “hotspot” near...

28
PART 2 ISCO PART 2 ISCO

Upload: others

Post on 13-Jul-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: PART 2 ‐ ISCO - NEWMOA · 2009 Persulfate Injection • Focus on “hotspot” near 32M‐01‐18XBR – 50 XX 5050 XX 2525 ftft (10(10 ftft. SaturatedSaturated thickness)thickness)

PART 2 ‐ ISCOPART 2  ISCO

Page 2: PART 2 ‐ ISCO - NEWMOA · 2009 Persulfate Injection • Focus on “hotspot” near 32M‐01‐18XBR – 50 XX 5050 XX 2525 ftft (10(10 ftft. SaturatedSaturated thickness)thickness)

NEXT STEPSNEXT STEPS• Develop Remedial Strategy (ISCO) in p gy ( )consideration of competing CSMs

• CSM 1 (Simplistic): Residual NAPL: ‘Pancake’ Model– Residual NAPL:  Pancake  Model

– Bedrock as Equivalent Porous Medium (EPM)• CSM2 (More Complex)( p )

• Residual NAPL: Vertical Equilibrium Model (VEM)• Bedrock: CSM considers Bedrock Complexity (GFM)

• Remedial ImplementationRemedial Implementation• Evaluate Monitoring Data wrt CSM 1 and 2• Determine Next Stepsp

Page 3: PART 2 ‐ ISCO - NEWMOA · 2009 Persulfate Injection • Focus on “hotspot” near 32M‐01‐18XBR – 50 XX 5050 XX 2525 ftft (10(10 ftft. SaturatedSaturated thickness)thickness)

CSM ConsiderationsCSM Considerations

• Residual NAPL distributionResidual NAPL distribution– “Pancake Model”Vertical Equilibrium Model– Vertical Equilibrium Model

• Fracture System/GFM– Sub‐horizontal “Sheeting Fractures”– West‐Dipping Foliation Parallel Fractures

• GFM implications to CSM and ISCO effectiveness

Page 4: PART 2 ‐ ISCO - NEWMOA · 2009 Persulfate Injection • Focus on “hotspot” near 32M‐01‐18XBR – 50 XX 5050 XX 2525 ftft (10(10 ftft. SaturatedSaturated thickness)thickness)

Vertical LNAPL DistributionVertical LNAPL Distribution

No YesPancake Model                  vs.        Vertical Equilibrium Model

No Yes

Vertical EquilibriumPancake Model

•LNAPL penetrates b l

•Assumes LNAPL floats on water

LNAPL

below water table

•LNAPL and t i t

on water table

• Uniform LNAPL

Water

water coexist in pores

LNAPL saturation Grains

Page 5: PART 2 ‐ ISCO - NEWMOA · 2009 Persulfate Injection • Focus on “hotspot” near 32M‐01‐18XBR – 50 XX 5050 XX 2525 ftft (10(10 ftft. SaturatedSaturated thickness)thickness)

“PANCAKE MODEL”W E Hydrogeologic Cross SectionW‐E Hydrogeologic Cross‐Section

UST 13 Area

Page 6: PART 2 ‐ ISCO - NEWMOA · 2009 Persulfate Injection • Focus on “hotspot” near 32M‐01‐18XBR – 50 XX 5050 XX 2525 ftft (10(10 ftft. SaturatedSaturated thickness)thickness)

GFM  ‐ Observed Fracture System

Page 7: PART 2 ‐ ISCO - NEWMOA · 2009 Persulfate Injection • Focus on “hotspot” near 32M‐01‐18XBR – 50 XX 5050 XX 2525 ftft (10(10 ftft. SaturatedSaturated thickness)thickness)

True‐Scale Cross Section of UST‐13 Area Normal to Foliation, Illustrating MonitoringNormal to Foliation, Illustrating Monitoring 

Gap

Page 8: PART 2 ‐ ISCO - NEWMOA · 2009 Persulfate Injection • Focus on “hotspot” near 32M‐01‐18XBR – 50 XX 5050 XX 2525 ftft (10(10 ftft. SaturatedSaturated thickness)thickness)

Conceptual Fracture NetworkConceptual Fracture Network

Page 9: PART 2 ‐ ISCO - NEWMOA · 2009 Persulfate Injection • Focus on “hotspot” near 32M‐01‐18XBR – 50 XX 5050 XX 2525 ftft (10(10 ftft. SaturatedSaturated thickness)thickness)

NAPL Pathway – Active Fracturesi l ilib i d lVertical Equilibrium Model

UST

Page 10: PART 2 ‐ ISCO - NEWMOA · 2009 Persulfate Injection • Focus on “hotspot” near 32M‐01‐18XBR – 50 XX 5050 XX 2525 ftft (10(10 ftft. SaturatedSaturated thickness)thickness)

Vertical Equilibrium ModelC t l S Z Hi h W t T blConceptual Smear Zone – High Water Table

UST

Page 11: PART 2 ‐ ISCO - NEWMOA · 2009 Persulfate Injection • Focus on “hotspot” near 32M‐01‐18XBR – 50 XX 5050 XX 2525 ftft (10(10 ftft. SaturatedSaturated thickness)thickness)

Vertical Equilibrium ModelConceptual Smear Zone – Low Water TableConceptual Smear Zone  Low Water Table

UST

Page 12: PART 2 ‐ ISCO - NEWMOA · 2009 Persulfate Injection • Focus on “hotspot” near 32M‐01‐18XBR – 50 XX 5050 XX 2525 ftft (10(10 ftft. SaturatedSaturated thickness)thickness)
Page 13: PART 2 ‐ ISCO - NEWMOA · 2009 Persulfate Injection • Focus on “hotspot” near 32M‐01‐18XBR – 50 XX 5050 XX 2525 ftft (10(10 ftft. SaturatedSaturated thickness)thickness)

?

Page 14: PART 2 ‐ ISCO - NEWMOA · 2009 Persulfate Injection • Focus on “hotspot” near 32M‐01‐18XBR – 50 XX 5050 XX 2525 ftft (10(10 ftft. SaturatedSaturated thickness)thickness)

2009 Persulfate Injection

Page 15: PART 2 ‐ ISCO - NEWMOA · 2009 Persulfate Injection • Focus on “hotspot” near 32M‐01‐18XBR – 50 XX 5050 XX 2525 ftft (10(10 ftft. SaturatedSaturated thickness)thickness)

2009 Persulfate Injection2009 Persulfate Injection• Focus on “hotspot” near 32M‐01‐18XBR

– 50 X 50 X 25 ft (10 ft Saturated thickness)50 X 50 X 25 ft  (10 ft. Saturated thickness)– 3 shallow bedrock injection wells installed around 32M‐01‐18XBRb d i j i ll i ll d f• Overburden injection well installed on Top‐of‐

bedrock in former tank grave• 1800 gallons of water/sodium persulfate solution• 1800 gallons of water/sodium persulfate solution injected February 2009 (5000 lbs)

• sodium hydroxide used as catalyst• ~ $36,000 (Estimate)

Page 16: PART 2 ‐ ISCO - NEWMOA · 2009 Persulfate Injection • Focus on “hotspot” near 32M‐01‐18XBR – 50 XX 5050 XX 2525 ftft (10(10 ftft. SaturatedSaturated thickness)thickness)

2009 Persulfate Injection2009 Persulfate Injection

Page 17: PART 2 ‐ ISCO - NEWMOA · 2009 Persulfate Injection • Focus on “hotspot” near 32M‐01‐18XBR – 50 XX 5050 XX 2525 ftft (10(10 ftft. SaturatedSaturated thickness)thickness)

Injection Pressure ResponseFar FieldFar Field

Data Corrupted

Page 18: PART 2 ‐ ISCO - NEWMOA · 2009 Persulfate Injection • Focus on “hotspot” near 32M‐01‐18XBR – 50 XX 5050 XX 2525 ftft (10(10 ftft. SaturatedSaturated thickness)thickness)

Injection Pressure ResponseNear FieldNear Field

Transducer Malfunction

Page 19: PART 2 ‐ ISCO - NEWMOA · 2009 Persulfate Injection • Focus on “hotspot” near 32M‐01‐18XBR – 50 XX 5050 XX 2525 ftft (10(10 ftft. SaturatedSaturated thickness)thickness)

Injection Conductivity ResponseNear FieldNear Field

Discernable Conductivity Increase

Page 20: PART 2 ‐ ISCO - NEWMOA · 2009 Persulfate Injection • Focus on “hotspot” near 32M‐01‐18XBR – 50 XX 5050 XX 2525 ftft (10(10 ftft. SaturatedSaturated thickness)thickness)

May 2010300 ug/l300 ug/l

Cleanup goal = 600 ug/l

Page 21: PART 2 ‐ ISCO - NEWMOA · 2009 Persulfate Injection • Focus on “hotspot” near 32M‐01‐18XBR – 50 XX 5050 XX 2525 ftft (10(10 ftft. SaturatedSaturated thickness)thickness)

May 2010y59 ug/l

Cleanup goal = 40 ug/l

Page 22: PART 2 ‐ ISCO - NEWMOA · 2009 Persulfate Injection • Focus on “hotspot” near 32M‐01‐18XBR – 50 XX 5050 XX 2525 ftft (10(10 ftft. SaturatedSaturated thickness)thickness)

M 2010May 2010300 ug/l

Cleanup goal = 200 ug/l

Page 23: PART 2 ‐ ISCO - NEWMOA · 2009 Persulfate Injection • Focus on “hotspot” near 32M‐01‐18XBR – 50 XX 5050 XX 2525 ftft (10(10 ftft. SaturatedSaturated thickness)thickness)

Water Levels - 32M-01-18XBR

248

244

246

242

vatio

n - m

sl

Series1

238

240

WL

Elev

236

234

Jan-0

2Mar-

02May

-02Ju

l-02

Sep-02

Nov-02

Jan-0

3Mar-

03May

-03Ju

l-03

Sep-03

Nov-03

Jan-0

4Mar-

04May

-04Ju

l-04

Sep-04

Date

Page 24: PART 2 ‐ ISCO - NEWMOA · 2009 Persulfate Injection • Focus on “hotspot” near 32M‐01‐18XBR – 50 XX 5050 XX 2525 ftft (10(10 ftft. SaturatedSaturated thickness)thickness)

True‐Scale Cross Section of UST‐13 Area Normal F li i I j i W ll I ll dto Foliation, Injection Wells Installed

Page 25: PART 2 ‐ ISCO - NEWMOA · 2009 Persulfate Injection • Focus on “hotspot” near 32M‐01‐18XBR – 50 XX 5050 XX 2525 ftft (10(10 ftft. SaturatedSaturated thickness)thickness)

Questions for Ongoing LTMQuestions for Ongoing LTM

• Is the apparent COC attenuation real?Is the apparent COC attenuation real?• Or will the Oscillatory longer‐term trends resume• Does the site behave as a typical “drowned smearDoes the site behave as a typical  drowned smear zone”?

• Delivery: Will future remedial efforts need to moreDelivery: Will future remedial efforts need to more carefully consider the bedrock fracture system?

• Deliverance (Site Closure): How might one increase ( ) gthe oxidant contact with residual contaminants? 

Page 26: PART 2 ‐ ISCO - NEWMOA · 2009 Persulfate Injection • Focus on “hotspot” near 32M‐01‐18XBR – 50 XX 5050 XX 2525 ftft (10(10 ftft. SaturatedSaturated thickness)thickness)

Next StepsNext Steps• Install • Update CSM

– Install Transducers to evaluate long‐term water level trends– Improve Geologic‐Fracture Model (GFM); – Evaluate COC trends wrt WLs and GFM

• Determine whether additional remedial measures are needed

• If necessary, Consider Injecting in down‐dip directions (Likely Location of Residual Contaminants) 

• Monitor in down gradient areas in consideration of bedrock ground water gradients and bedrock fabric

Page 27: PART 2 ‐ ISCO - NEWMOA · 2009 Persulfate Injection • Focus on “hotspot” near 32M‐01‐18XBR – 50 XX 5050 XX 2525 ftft (10(10 ftft. SaturatedSaturated thickness)thickness)

2009 Persulfate Injection2009 Persulfate Injection

INJECT HEREINJECT HERE

MONITOR HERE

Page 28: PART 2 ‐ ISCO - NEWMOA · 2009 Persulfate Injection • Focus on “hotspot” near 32M‐01‐18XBR – 50 XX 5050 XX 2525 ftft (10(10 ftft. SaturatedSaturated thickness)thickness)

• THANKSTHANKS

Q i ??• Question ??