PART 200—UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS, COST PRINCIPLES, AND AUDIT REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL AWARDS § 200.33 Equipment. Equipment means tangible personal property (including information technology systems) having a useful life of more than one year and a per-unit acquisition cost which equals or exceeds the lesser of the capitalization level established by the non-Federal entity for financial statement purposes, or $5,000. See also §§ 200.12 Capital assets, 200.20 Computing devices, 200.48 General purpose equipment, 200.58 Information technology systems, 200.89 Special purpose equipment, and 200.94 Supplies. § 200.58 Information technology systems. Information technology systems means computing devices, ancillary equipment, software, firmware, and similar procedures, services (including support services), and related resources. See also §§ 200.20 Computing devices and 200.33 Equipment. § 200.67 Micro-purchase. Micro-purchase means a purchase of supplies or services using simplified acquisition procedures, the aggregate amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold. Micro-purchase procedures comprise a subset of a non-Federal entity’s small purchase procedures. The non-Federal entity uses such procedures in order to expedite the completion of its lowest-dollar small purchase transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The micro-purchase threshold is set by the Federal Acquisition Regulation at 48 CFR Subpart 2.1 (Definitions). It is $3,000 except as otherwise discussed in Subpart 2.1 of that regulation, but this threshold is periodically adjusted for inflation. § 200.88 Simplified acquisition threshold. Simplified acquisition threshold means the dollar amount below which a non-Federal entity may purchase property or services using small purchase methods. Non-Federal entities adopt small purchase procedures in order to expedite the purchase of items costing less than the simplified acquisition threshold. The simplified acquisition threshold is set by the Federal Acquisition Regulation at 48 CFR Subpart 2.1 (Definitions) and in accordance with 41 U.S.C. 1908. As of the publication of this Part, the simplified acquisition threshold is $150,000, but this threshold is periodically adjusted for inflation. (Also see definition of § 200.67 Micro-purchase.) § 200.94 Supplies. Supplies means all tangible personal property other than those described in § 200.33 Equipment. A computing device is a supply if the acquisition cost is less than the lesser of the capitalization level established by the non-Federal entity for financial statement purposes or $5,000, regardless of the length of its useful life. See also §§ 200.20 Computing devices and 200.33 Equipment.

§ 200.302 Financial management. …(b) The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following (see also §§ 200.333 Retention requirements for records, 200.334 Requests for transfer of records, 200.335 Methods for collection, transmission and storage of information, 200.336 Access to records, and 200.337 Restrictions on public access to records): …(6) Written procedures to implement the requirements of § 200.305 Payment. (7) Written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E—Cost Principles of this Part and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. § 200.305 Payment. … (b) For non-Federal entities other than states, payments methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer, or issuance or redemption of checks, warrants, or payment by other means. (1) The non-Federal entity must be paid in advance, provided it maintains or demonstrates the willingness to maintain both written procedures that minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds and disbursement by the non-Federal entity, and financial management systems that meet the standards for fund control and accountability as established in this Part. Advance payments to a non-Federal entity must be limited to the minimum amounts needed and be timed to be in accordance with the actual, immediate cash requirements of the non-Federal entity in carrying out the purpose of the approved program or project. The timing and amount of advance payments must be as close as is administratively feasible to the actual disbursements by the non-Federal entity for direct program or project costs and the proportionate share of any allowable indirect costs. The non-Federal entity must make timely payment to contractors in accordance with the contract provisions. …(7) Standards governing the use of banks and other institutions as depositories of advance payments under Federal awards are as follows. (i) The Federal awarding agency and pass-through entity must not require separate depository accounts for funds provided to a non-Federal entity or establish any eligibility requirements for depositories for funds provided to the non-Federal entity. However, the non-Federal entity must be able to account for the receipt, obligation and expenditure of funds. (ii) Advance payments of Federal funds must be deposited and maintained in insured accounts whenever possible. (8) The non-Federal entity must maintain advance payments of Federal awards in interest-bearing accounts, unless the following apply. (i) The non-Federal entity receives less than $120,000 in Federal awards per year. (ii) The best reasonably available interest-bearing account would not be expected to earn interest in excess of $500 per year on Federal cash balances. (iii) The depository would require an average or minimum balance so high that it would not be feasible within the expected Federal and non-Federal cash resources. (iv) A foreign government or banking system prohibits or precludes interest bearing accounts. (9) Interest earned amounts up to $500 per year may be retained by the non-Federal entity for administrative expense. Any additional interest earned on Federal advance payments deposited in interest-bearing accounts must be remitted annually to the Department of Health and Human Services Payment Management System (PMS) through an electronic medium using either Automated Clearing House (ACH) network or a Fedwire Funds Service payment…

§ 200.318 General procurement standards. (a) The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part. (b) Non-Federal entities must maintain oversight to ensure that contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts or purchase orders. (c)(1) The non-Federal entity must maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the performance of its employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts. No employee, officer, or agent must participate in the selection, award, or administration of a contract supported by a Federal award if he or she has a real or apparent conflict of interest. Such a conflict of interest would arise when the employee, officer, or agent, any member of his or her immediate family, his or her partner, or an organization which employs or is about to employ any of the parties indicated herein, has a financial or other interest in or a tangible personal benefit from a firm considered for a contract. The officers, employees, and agents of the non-Federal entity must neither solicit nor accept gratuities, favors, or anything of monetary value from contractors or parties to subcontracts. However, non-Federal entities may set standards for situations in which the financial interest is not substantial or the gift is an unsolicited item of nominal value. The standards of conduct must provide for disciplinary actions to be applied for violations of such standards by officers, employees, or agents of the non-Federal entity. § 200.319 Competition. (a) All procurement transactions must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of this section. In order to ensure objective contractor performance and eliminate unfair competitive advantage, contractors that develop or draft specifications, requirements, statements of work, and invitations for bids or requests for proposals must be excluded from competing for such procurements. Some of the situations considered to be restrictive of competition include but are not limited to: (1) Placing unreasonable requirements on firms in order for them to qualify to do business; (2) Requiring unnecessary experience and excessive bonding; (3) Noncompetitive pricing practices between firms or between affiliated companies; (4) Noncompetitive contracts to consultants that are on retainer contracts; (5) Organizational conflicts of interest; (6) Specifying only a ‘‘brand name’’ product instead of allowing ‘‘an equal’’ product to be offered and describing the performance or other relevant requirements of the procurement; and (7) Any arbitrary action in the procurement process. (b) The non-Federal entity must conduct procurements in a manner that prohibits the use of statutorily or administratively imposed state, local, or tribal geographical preferences in the evaluation of bids or proposals, except in those cases where applicable Federal statutes expressly mandate or encourage geographic preference. Nothing in this section preempts state licensing laws. When contracting for architectural and engineering (A/E) services, geographic location may be a selection criterion provided its application leaves an appropriate number of qualified firms, given the nature and size of the project, to compete for the contract. (c) The non-Federal entity must have written procedures for procurement transactions. These procedures must ensure that all solicitations: (1) Incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product, or service to be procured. Such description must not, in competitive procurements, contain features which unduly restrict competition. The description may include a statement

of the qualitative nature of the material, product or service to be procured and, when necessary, must set forth those minimum essential characteristics and standards to which it must conform if it is to satisfy its intended use. Detailed product specifications should be avoided if at all possible. When it is impractical or uneconomical to make a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements, a ‘‘brand name or equivalent’’ description may be used as a means to define the performance or other salient requirements of procurement. The specific features of the named brand which must be met by offers must be clearly stated; and (2) Identify all requirements which the offerors must fulfill and all other factors to be used in evaluating bids or proposals. (d) The non-Federal entity must ensure that all prequalified lists of persons, firms, or products which are used in acquiring goods and services are current and include enough qualified sources to ensure maximum open and free competition. Also, the non-Federal entity must not preclude potential bidders from qualifying during the solicitation period. § 200.320 Methods of procurement to followed. The non-Federal entity must use one of the following methods of procurement. (a) Procurement by micro-purchases. Procurement by micro-purchase is the acquisition of supplies or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (§200.67 Micro-purchase). To the extent practicable, the non-Federal entity must distribute micro-purchases equitably among qualified suppliers. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable. (b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. (c) Procurement by sealed bids (formal advertising). Bids are publicly solicited… (d) Procurement by competitive proposals. The technique of competitive proposals is normally conducted with more than one source submitting an offer, and either a fixed price or cost reimbursement type contract is awarded. It is generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. If this method is used, the following requirements apply: (1) Requests for proposals must be publicized and identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance. Any response to publicized requests for proposals must be considered to the maximum extent practical; (2) Proposals must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified sources; (3) The non-Federal entity must have a written method for conducting technical evaluations of the proposals received and for selecting recipients; (4) Contracts must be awarded to the responsible firm whose proposal is most advantageous to the program, with price and other factors considered; and… (f) Procurement by noncompetitive proposals. Procurement by noncompetitive proposals is procurement through solicitation of a proposal from only one source and may be used only when one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The item is available only from a single source; (2) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from competitive solicitation;

(3) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes noncompetitive proposals in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (4) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. § 200.474 Travel costs. (a) General. Travel costs are the expenses for transportation, lodging, subsistence, and related items incurred by employees who are in travel status on official business of the non-Federal entity. Such costs may be charged on an actual cost basis, on a per diem or mileage basis in lieu of actual costs incurred, or on a combination of the two, provided the method used is applied to an entire trip and not to selected days of the trip, and results in charges consistent with those normally allowed in like circumstances in the non-Federal entity’s non-federally-funded activities and in accordance with non-Federal entity’s written travel reimbursement policies… (b) Lodging and subsistence. Costs incurred by employees and officers for travel, including costs of lodging, other subsistence, and incidental expenses, must be considered reasonable and otherwise allowable only to the extent such costs do not exceed charges normally allowed by the non-Federal entity in its regular operations as the result of the non-Federal entity’s written travel policy. In addition, if these costs are charged directly to the Federal award documentation must justify that: (1) Participation of the individual is necessary to the Federal award; and (2) The costs are reasonable and consistent with non-Federal entity’s established travel policy.

Examiners Update to County Administrators

Presented by: James E. Hall, CPA

Director County Audit Division

Examiners of Public Accounts

State of Alabama

Disclaimer

This information was presented to the Association of County Administrators of Alabama’s (ACAA) Annual Conference on May 12, 2016.

This presentation represents the audit position of the Department of Examiners of Public Accounts as of that date.

INFORMATION

Facebook page – Alabama Department of Examiners of Public Accounts

Twitter – Follow us @Examiners3

“Fraud Hotline” to report fraud, waste or abuse:

1-844-56-FRAUD (1-844-563-7283)

Report.fraud@examiners.alabama.gov

Overview

Uniform Guidance (CFR 200)

GASB Updates

Miscellaneous Audit Topics

Uniform Guidance ( 2 CFR 200)

Single Audit Threshold increased from $500,000 to $750,000 expended per year

Audit Finding Follow-up (2 CFR 200.511) – The auditee must prepare a summary schedule of prior audit findings related to federal awards and a corrective action plan

New requirements concerning policies for certain areas – 200 CFR policies

GASB Updates

Don’t shoot the messenger! GASB 72-82

72 – 126 pages

73 – 140 pages

74 – 122 pages

75 – 310 pages

76 – 50 pages

77 – 50 pages

78 – 30 pages

79 – 62 pages

80 – 24 pages

81 – 46 pages

82 – 32 pages

GASB 72

Statement No. 72Fair Value Measurement and ApplicationEffective Date: The requirements of this Statement are effective for financial statements for reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2015. Earlier application is encouraged.(Issued 02/15)

Effective FY2016

GASB 72

Addresses accounting and financial reporting issues related to fair value measurements. The definition of fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.

Provides guidance for determining a fair value measurement for financial reporting purposes.

Also provides guidance for applying fair value to certain investments and disclosures related to all fair value measurements.

GASB 72

Fair Value Measurement

Fair value is described as an exit price. Fair value measurements assume a transaction takes place in a government’s principal market, or a government’s most advantageous market in the absence of a principal market. The fair value also should be measured assuming that general market participants would act in their economic best interest. Fair value should not be adjusted for transaction costs.

GASB 72

To determine a fair value measurement, a government should consider the unit of account of the asset or liability. The unit of account refers to the level at which an asset or a liability is aggregated or disaggregated for measurement, recognition, or disclosure purposes as provided by the accounting standards. For example, the unit of account for investments held in a brokerage account is each individual security, whereas the unit of account for an investment in a mutual fund is each share in the mutual fund held by a government.

GASB 72

Requires a government to use valuation techniques that are appropriate under the circumstances and for which sufficient data are available to measure fair value.

The techniques should be consistent with one or more of the following approaches: the market approach, the cost approach, or the income approach. Market approach uses prices and other relevant information

generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets, liabilities, or a group of assets and liabilities.

Cost approach reflects the amount that would be required to replace the present service capacity of an asset.

Income approach converts future amounts (such as cash flows or income and expenses) to a single current (discounted) amount.

GASB 72

Fair Value Application

Generally requires investments to be measured at fair value.

An investment is defined as a security or other asset that (a) a government holds primarily for the purpose of income or profit and (b) has a present service capacity based solely on its ability to generate cash or to be sold to generate cash. Investments not measured at fair value continue to include, for example, money market investments

Requires measurement at acquisition value (an entry price) for donated capital assets, donated works of art, historical treasures, and similar assets and capital assets received in a service concession arrangement. These assets were previously required to be measured at fair value.

GASB 72

Fair Value Disclosures

This Statement requires disclosures to be made about fair value measurements, the level of fair value hierarchy, and valuation techniques. Governments should organize these disclosures by type of asset or liability reported at fair value. It also requires additional disclosures regarding investments in certain entities that calculate net asset value per share (or its equivalent).

GASB 73

Statement No. 73Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions and Related Assets That Are Not within the Scope of GASBStatement 68, and Amendments to Certain Provisions of GASB Statements 67 and 68Effective Date: The provisions in Statement 73 are effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2015—except those provisions that address employers and governmental nonemployer contributing entities for pensions that are not within the scope of Statement 68, which are effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2016. Earlier application is encouraged.(Issued 06/15)

Effective FY2016 & FY2017

GASB 73

Any assets accumulated for pensions that are provided through pension plans that are not administered through trusts should not be considered pension plan assets.

It also requires that information similar to that required by Statement 68 be included in notes to financial statements and required supplementary information by all similarly situated employers and nonemployercontributing entities.

GASB 73

Clarifies the application of certain provisions of Statements 67 and 68 with regard to the following issues: Information that is required to be presented as notes to

the 10-year schedules of required supplementary information about investment-related factors that significantly affect trends in the amounts reported

Accounting and financial reporting for separately financed specific liabilities of individual employers and nonemployer contributing entities for defined benefit pensions

Timing of employer recognition of revenue for the support of nonemployer contributing entities not in a special funding situation.

GASB 74

Statement No. 74Financial Reporting for Postemployment Benefit PlansOther Than Pension PlansEffective Date: The provisions in Statement 74 are effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2016. Earlier application is encouraged.(Issued 06/15)

FY2017

GASB 74

This Statement replaces Statements No. 43, Financial Reporting for Postemployment Benefit Plans Other Than Pension Plans, as amended, and No. 57, OPEBMeasurements by Agent Employers and Agent Multiple-Employer Plans. It also includes requirements for defined contribution OPEB plans that replace the requirements for those OPEB plans in Statement No. 25, Financial Reporting for Defined Benefit Pension Plans and Note Disclosures for Defined Contribution Plans, as amended, Statement 43, and Statement No. 50, Pension Disclosures.

GASB 75

Statement No. 75Accounting and Financial Reporting for Postemployment Benefits Other Than PensionsEffective Date: The provisions in Statement 75 are effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2017. Earlier application is encouraged. (Issued 06/15)

FY2018

GASB 75

Replaces the requirements of Statements No. 45, Accounting and Financial Reporting by Employers for Postemployment Benefits Other Than Pensions, as amended, and No. 57, OPEB Measurements by Agent Employers and Agent Multiple-Employer Plans, for OPEB. Statement No. 74, Financial Reporting for Postemployment Benefit Plans Other Than Pension Plans, establishes new accounting and financial reporting requirements for OPEB plans.

GASB 75

Divided into two primary sections OPEB provided through plans administered as trusts or

equivalent arrangements

OPEB provided through plans that are NOT administered as trusts or equivalent arrangements

GASB 75

Postemployment healthcare benefits Medical, dental, vision, hearing, other health-related

benefits

Provided either separately from or through a pension plan

Other postemployment benefits when provided separately from a pension plan Death benefits, life insurance, disability, long-term care

GASB 75

No significant changes for accounting for OPEB in governmental funds

SIGNIFICANT changes to methods and assumptions used to determine actuarial information for GAAP reporting purposes

Employers participating in trusted plans recognize NET OPEB liability

Employers participating in non-trusted plans recognize TOTAL OPEB liabilitity

GASB 75

Addresses accounting and financial reporting for OPEB that is provided to the employees of state and local governmental employers.

Establishes standards for recognizing and measuring liabilities, deferred outflows of resources, deferred inflows of resources, and expense/expenditures.

For defined benefit OPEB, this Statement identifies the methods and assumptions that are required to be used to project benefit payments, discount projected benefit payments to their actuarial present value, and attribute that present value to periods of employee service.

Note disclosure and required supplementary information requirements about defined benefit OPEB also are addressed.

GASB 75

Details the recognition and disclosure requirements for employers with payables to defined benefit OPEBplans that are administered through trusts that meet the specified criteria and for employers whose employees are provided with defined contribution OPEB.

Also addresses certain circumstances in which a nonemployer entity provides financial support for OPEB of employees of another entity.

GASB 75

In this Statement, distinctions are made regarding the particular requirements depending upon whether the OPEB plans through which the benefits are provided are administered through trusts that meet the following criteria: Contributions from employers and nonemployer

contributing entities to the OPEB plan and earnings on those contributions are irrevocable.

OPEB plan assets are dedicated to providing OPEB to plan members in accordance with the benefit terms.

OPEB plan assets are legally protected from the creditors of employers, nonemployer contributing entities, the OPEB plan administrator, and the plan members.

GASB 76

GASB Statement No. 76, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles for State and Local GovernmentsEffective Date: The provisions in Statement 76 are effective for reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2015. Earlier application is encouraged.(Issued 06/15)

FY2016

GASB 76

The objective of this Statement is to the hierarchy of generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The “GAAP hierarchy” consists of the sources of accounting principles used to prepare financial statements of state and local governmental entities in conformity with GAAP and the framework for selecting those principles.

This Statement reduces the GAAP hierarchy to two categories of authoritative GAAP and addresses the use of authoritative and nonauthoritative literature in the event that the accounting treatment for a transaction or other event is not specified within a source of authoritative GAAP.

GASB 76

This Statement supersedes Statement No. 55, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles for State and Local Governments.

GASB 77

GASB Statement No. 77, Tax Abatement DisclosuresEffective Date: The requirements of this Statement are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Earlier application is encouraged.(Issued 08/15)

FY2017

GASB 77

Financial statements prepared by state and local governments in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles provide citizens and taxpayers, legislative and oversight bodies, municipal bond analysts, and others with information they need to evaluate the financial health of governments, make decisions, and assess accountability.

GASB 77

This information is intended, among other things, to assist these users of financial statements in assessing (1) whether a government’s current-year revenues were sufficient to pay for current-year services (known as interperiod equity), (2) whether a government complied with finance-related legal and contractual obligations, (3) where a government’s financial resources come from and how it uses them, and (4) a government’s financial position and economic condition and how they have changed over time.

GASB 77

Financial statement users need information about certain limitations on a government’s ability to raise resources. This includes limitations on revenue-raising capacity resulting from government programs that use tax abatements to induce behavior by individuals and entities that is beneficial to the government or its citizens. Tax abatements are widely used by state and local governments, particularly to encourage economic development.

GASB 77

For financial reporting purposes, this Statement defines a tax abatement as resulting from an agreement between a government and an individual or entity in which the government promises to forgo tax revenues and the individual or entity promises to subsequently take a specific action that contributes to economic development or otherwise benefits the government or its citizens.

GASB 77

Although many governments offer tax abatements and provide information to the public about them, they do not always provide the information necessary to assess how tax abatements affect their financial position and results of operations, including their ability to raise resources in the future.

This Statement requires disclosure of tax abatement information about (1) a reporting government’s own tax abatement agreements and (2) those that are entered into by other governments and that reduce the reporting government’s tax revenues.

GASB 77

This Statement requires governments that enter into tax abatement agreements to disclose the following information about the agreements: Brief descriptive information, such as the tax being

abated, the authority under which tax abatements are provided, eligibility criteria, the mechanism by which taxes are abated, provisions for recapturing abated taxes, and the types of commitments made by tax abatement recipients

The gross dollar amount of taxes abated during the period

Commitments made by a government, other than to abate taxes, as part of a tax abatement agreement.

GASB 77

Tax abatement agreements of other governments should be organized by the government that entered into the tax abatement agreement and the specific tax being abated. Governments may disclose information for individual tax abatement agreements of other governments within the specific tax being abated. For those tax abatement agreements, a reporting government should disclose: The names of the governments that entered into the

agreements The specific taxes being abated The gross dollar amount of taxes abated during the

period.

GASB 78

GASB Statement No. 78, Pensions Provided through Certain Multiple-Employer Defined Benefit Pension PlansEffective Date: The requirements of this Statement are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Earlier application is encouraged.(Issued 12/15)

FY2017

GASB 78

Prior to the issuance of this Statement, the requirements of Statement 68 applied to the financial statements of all state and local governmental employers whose employees are provided with pensions through pension plans that are administered through trusts.

GASB 78

This Statement amends the scope and applicability of Statement 68 to exclude pensions provided to employees of state or local governmental employers through a cost-sharing multiple-employer defined benefit pension plan that (1) is not a state or local governmental pension plan, (2) is used to provide defined benefit pensions both to employees of state or local governmental employers and to employees of employers that are not state or local governmental employers, and (3) has no predominant state or local governmental employer (either individually or collectively with other state or local governmental employers that provide pensions through the pension plan).

GASB 78

This Statement establishes requirements for recognition and measurement of pension expense, expenditures, and liabilities; note disclosures; and required supplementary information for pensions that have the characteristics described above.

GASB 79

GASB Statement No. 79, Certain External Investment Pools and Pool ParticipantsEffective Date: The requirements of this Statement are effective for reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2015, except for the provisions in paragraphs 18, 19, 23–26, and 40, which are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Earlier application is encouraged.(Issued 12/15)

FY2016 & FY2017

GASB 79

This Statement addresses accounting and financial reporting for certain external investment pools and pool participants. Specifically, it establishes criteria for an external investment pool to qualify for making the election to measure all of its investments at amortized cost for financial reporting purposes.

GASB 79

An external investment pool qualifies for that reporting if it meets all of the applicable criteria established in the Statement.

The specific criteria address (1) how the external investment pool transacts with participants; (2) requirements for portfolio maturity, quality, diversification, and liquidity; and (3) calculation and requirements of a shadow price. Significant noncompliance prevents the external investment pool from measuring all of its investments at amortized cost for financial reporting purposes.

GASB 79

If an external investment pool does not meet the criteria established by this Statement, that pool should apply the provisions in paragraph 16 of Statement No. 31, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Certain Investments and for External Investment Pools, as amended.

If an external investment pool meets the criteria in this Statement and measures all of its investments at amortized cost, the pool’s participants also should measure their investments in that external investment pool at amortized cost for financial reporting purposes.

If an external investment pool does not meet the criteria in this Statement, the pool’s participants should measure their investments in that pool at fair value, as provided in paragraph 11 of Statement 31, as amended.

GASB 79

This Statement establishes additional note disclosure requirements for qualifying external investment pools that measure all of their investments at amortized cost for financial reporting purposes and for governments that participate in those pools.

Those disclosures for both the qualifying external investment pools and their participants include information about any limitations or restrictions on participant withdrawals.

GASB 80

GASB Statement No. 80, Blending Requirements for Certain Component Units—an amendment of GASBStatement No. 14Effective Date: The requirements of this Statement are effective for reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2016. Earlier application is encouraged.(Issued 01/16)

FY2017

GASB 80

The objective of this Statement is to improve financial reporting by clarifying the financial statement presentation requirements for certain component units. This Statement amends the blending requirements established in paragraph 53 of Statement No. 14, The Financial Reporting Entity, as amended.

GASB 80

This Statement amends the blending requirements for the financial statement presentation of component units of all state and local governments. The additional criterion requires blending of a component unit incorporated as a not-for-profit corporation in which the primary government is the sole corporate member. The additional criterion does not apply to component units included in the financial reporting entity pursuant to the provisions of Statement No. 39, Determining Whether Certain Organizations Are Component Units.

GASB 81

GASB Statement No. 81, Irrevocable Split-Interest AgreementsEffective Date: The requirements of this Statement are effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Earlier application is encouraged.(Issued 03/16)

FY2017

GASB 81

The objective of this Statement is to improve accounting and financial reporting for irrevocable split-interest agreements by providing recognition and measurement guidance for situations in which a government is a beneficiary of the agreement.

GASB 81

Split-interest agreements are a type of giving agreement used by donors to provide resources to two or more beneficiaries, including governments. Split-interest agreements can be created through trusts—or other legally enforceable agreements with characteristics that are equivalent to split-interest agreements—in which a donor transfers resources to an intermediary to hold and administer for the benefit of a government and at least one other beneficiary. Examples of these types of agreements include charitable lead trusts, charitable remainder trusts, and life-interests in real estate.

GASB 81

This Statement requires that a government that receives resources pursuant to an irrevocable split-interest agreement recognize assets, liabilities, and deferred inflows of resources at the inception of the agreement. Furthermore, this Statement requires that a government recognize assets representing its beneficial interests in irrevocable split-interest agreements that are administered by a third party, if the government controls the present service capacity of the beneficial interests. This Statement requires that a government recognize revenue when the resources become applicable to the reporting period.

GASB 82

GASB Statement No. 82, Pension Issues—an amendment of GASB Statements No. 67, No. 68, and No. 73Effective Date: The requirements of this Statement are effective for reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2016, except for the requirements of paragraph 7 in a circumstance in which an employer’s pension liability is measured as of a date other than the employer’s most recent fiscal year-end. In that circumstance, the requirements of paragraph 7 are effective for that employer in the first reporting period in which the measurement date of the pension liability is on or after June 15, 2017. Earlier application is encouraged.(Issued 03/16)

FY2017 & FY2018

GASB 82

Presentation of Payroll-Related Measures in Required Supplementary Information

Prior to the issuance of this Statement, Statements 67 and 68 required presentation of covered-employee payroll, which is the payroll of employees that are provided with pensions through the pension plan, and ratios that use that measure, in schedules of required supplementary information. This Statement amends Statements 67 and 68 to instead require the presentation of covered payroll, defined as the payroll on which contributions to a pension plan are based, and ratios that use that measure.

GASB 82

Selection of Assumptions

This Statement clarifies that a deviation, as the term is used in Actuarial Standards of Practice issued by the Actuarial Standards Board, from the guidance in an Actuarial Standard of Practice is not considered to be in conformity with the requirements of Statement 67, Statement 68, or Statement 73 for the selection of assumptions used in determining the total pension liability and related measures.

GASB 82

Classification of Employer-Paid Member Contributions

This Statement clarifies that payments that are made by an employer to satisfy contribution requirements that are identified by the pension plan terms as plan member contribution requirements should be classified as plan member contributions for purposes of Statement 67 and as employee contributions for purposes of Statement 68. It also requires that an employer’s expense and expenditures for those amounts be recognized in the period for which the contribution is assessed and classified in the same manner as the employer classifies similar compensation other than pensions (for example, as salaries and wages or as fringe benefits).

Other Issues / Audit Topics

Contracts

Only the governing body has the authority to enter into contracts. Still seeing contracts being entered into by other officials

in the Courthouse.

There may be legal ramifications to County Commission if you are aware of this and let it continue.

Consult your attorney or ACCA staff.

Emergencies and Regular Bid Law

The Code of Alabama 1975, Section 41-16-53 – Alabama Competitive Bid Law

Must affect public health, safety or convenience, be declared in writing by the awarding authority, and such action and reasons should be immediately made public by the awarding authority.

Contracts may be let to the extent necessary to meet the emergency without public advertisement per ruling by the State Supreme Court (General Electric Co vs. City of Mobile 1991)

Emergencies and Public Works Code of Alabama 1975, Section 39-2-2 (e)

Must affect public health, safety, or convenience, as declared in writing by the awarding authority, setting forth the nature of the danger to the public health, safety, or convenience which would result from delay, contracts may be let to the extent necessary to meet the emergency without public advertisement. The action and the reasons for the action taken shall immediately be made public by the awarding authority upon request.

Public Works Law

Public Works Project – Definition The construction, installation, repair, renovation, or

maintenance of public buildings, structures, sewers, waterworks, roads, curbs, gutters, side walls, bridges, docks, underpasses, and viaducts as well as any other improvement to be constructed, installed, repaired, renovated, or maintained on public property and to be paid, in whole or in part, with public funds or with financing to be retired with public funds

Public Works Law

Public Works Project – Threshold $50,000

If a public works project is less than $50,000, does not have to be bid under the public works law or the regular competitive bid law.

However, a Commission can seek bids even if law does not require it!

Bid Files

Retain documentation in the bid file when items are purchased from state bid list

Print out information from state website at the time of purchase

Also, retain documentation in the bid file of joint bids

Obtain copy if the bid was prepared and awarded by another agency

Rejecting Bids

Section 41-16-27, Code of Alabama, 1975 The awarding authority or requisitioning agency shall

have the right to reject any bid if: The price is deemed excessive, or

The quality of the product is inferior

Purchasing Cooperatives

The Code of Alabama 1975, Section 41-16-51 Can only be used for the PURCHASE OF GOODS Cooperatives must be approved by the EPA in advance. When a County wants to purchase from a cooperative contract,

the County should write a letter to the EPA and request that we review the contract.

Written procedures on obtaining approval on the EPA website Upon review and approval, the EPA will provide County a letter

to document our approval, if not already approved and on our website.

Our website contains information on the cooperatives which have been approved

NOTE HB170 – (if passed) will allow for the purchase of services, other than purchase of voice or data wireless communication services

Approved Cooperatives as of 5/3/2016 U.S. Communities

The Cooperative Purchasing Network (TCPN)

National IPA

National Joint Powers Alliance (NJPA)

National Cooperative Purchasing Alliance (NCPA)

Houston-Galveston Area Council (H-GAC)

Bid Law

Act 2015-293, Acts of Alabama

41-16-50 (b) changed local preference zone allowance from no more than 3% to no more than 5% greater than the bid of the lowest responsible bidder.

Bid Law

41-16-50(d)…in the event the lowest bid for an item of personal property or services to be purchased or contracted for is received from a foreign entity, where the county, a municipality, or an instrumentality thereof is the awarding authority, the awarding authority may award the contract to responsible bidder whose bid is no more than 10% greater than the foreign entity if the bidder has a place of business within the local preference zone or is a responsible bidder from a business within the state that is a woman-owned enterprise, an enterprise of small business, a minority-owned business, a veteran-owned business, or a disadvantaged-owned business.

Foreign entity - a business entity that does not have a place of business with the state.

School Tax Levies

Be aware of when levies expire!

Amendment 778 – minimum of 10 mills for schools

County gets commissions on regular tax levies, however NO commissions on 778 levies.

Preparing and Understanding County Financial Statements Course 4 classes

71 Participants

43 Counties

No judgement

Interest in additional classes or more advanced classes – Please contact Donna Key / ACCA

Preparing and Understanding County Financial Statements Course

Special Thanks Debra Gibson – Pike County

Jordan Cox – Pike County

Matt Richards – EPA

Ashli Page – EPA

Cherie Raffle – EPA

ACCA Staff

Questions?

Facebook page – Alabama Department of Examiners of Public Accounts

Twitter – Follow us @Examiners3

“Fraud Hotline” to report fraud, waste or abuse:1-844-56-FRAUD (1-844-563-7283)

Report.fraud@examiners.alabama.gov