part4 application 6 30

Upload: susannagarza5375

Post on 30-May-2018

226 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/14/2019 Part4 Application 6 30

    1/222

    REQUEST FOR APPLICATION

    Part 4:

    Standard ApplicationSystem (SAS)

    Target Tech in Texas (T3)Collaborative GrantAmerican Recovery and

    Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of

    2009

    Authorized By

    Public Law 107110, CFDA# 84.386, No Child Left Behind(NCLB) Act of 2001, Title II, Part D

    andAmerican Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA or

    Recovery Act); enacted February 17, 2009 (P.L. 111-5)

  • 8/14/2019 Part4 Application 6 30

    2/222

    We want you to be successful.Please take one more look at your application!

    Deadline Thursday, July 9, 2009, 5:00 PM CT

    Submission Complete applications must be received in TEAsDocument Control Center on or before 5:00 PM(Central Time) on the deadline date indicated in the

    RFA.

    Application Each copy of application stapled in upper leftcorner.

    No binding of application in a notebook or folder.

    No cover sheet, table of contents, or divider

    pages.

    Must address all statutory requirements.

    Narrative Schedules:

    Must use required forms provided.No missing schedules.

    No font sizes smaller than 9 points, Arial orVerdana.

    No handwritten schedules; they must be typed.Must conform to specified format.

    Must not exceed specified page limitations.

    Number of Copies 6 complete copies must be received in TEA by

    5:00 PM (Central Time) on the deadline date.

    Signature Schedule #1at least 3 copies of the application

    must have an original signature of the personauthorized to bind the applicant in a contract.

    Provisions & Assurances(Schedules 6A-6F)

    Read these carefully and include in all pages of eachcopy of the application.

    Contact Person If you have any questions, please contact:

    [email protected]

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • 8/14/2019 Part4 Application 6 30

    3/222

    For TEA Use Only

    Adjustments and/or annotations madeon this page have been confirmed with

    _____________________

    by telephone/FAX on

    by of TEA.

    TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCYStandard Application System (SAS)

    School Years 2009-2010 and2010-2011

    Education ServiceCenter, R20

    Organization Name

    015-95County District N

    Amendment No.

    ________9-Digit Vendor ID

    2ESC Regi

    ________NOGA ID N

    (Assigned by TE

    Target Tech in Texas (T3) Collaborative GrantAmerican Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009

    Schedule #1 General InformationUse of the Standard Application System: This system provides a series of standard schedules to be used as formats by applicantwho apply for funds administered by the Texas Education Agency. If additional clarification is needed, please call Rebecca Schroeder 512-463-9269.Program Authority: Public Law 107-110, NCLB of 2001 Title II, Part D, Subpart 1, Enhancing Education Through Technology and theAmerican Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009, Title VIIIProject Beginning Date: 10/01/2009 Project Ending Date: 09/30/2011

    Part 1: Index to this Application: An X has been placed in the New Application column to indicate each schedulethat must be submitted as a part of the application. The applicant must place an X in this column for each additionalschedule submitted to complete the application. For amendments, the applicant must place an X in the AmendmentApplication column next to the schedule(s) being submitted as part of the amendment.

    Sch No. Schedule NameApplication

    New Amend1 General Information X X

    2 Shared Services Arrangement Certification3 Purpose of Amendment NA

    4 Program Summary and Application Requirements X NA

    4A Program Abstract: Collaborating Partners

    4B Program Description X

    4C Performance Assessment and Evaluation X

    4D Equitable Access and Participation X

    4E Private Nonprofit School Participation X

    5 Program Budget Summary X X

    5B Payroll Costs 6100

    5C Professional and Contracted Services 6200

    5D Supplies and Materials 6300

    5E Other Operating Costs 6400

    5G Capital Outlay 6600 (Exclusive of 6619 and 6629)

    6A General Provisions and Assurances X NA

    6B Debarment and Suspension Certification X NA6C Lobbying Certification X NA

    6D Disclosure of Lobbying Activities X NA

    6E NCLB Act Provisions and Assurances X NA

    6F Program-Specific Provisions and Assurances X NA

    Certification and IncorporationI hereby certify that the information contained in this application is, to the best of my knowledge, correct and that the organizationnamed above has authorized me as its representative to obligate this organization in a legally binding contractual agreement. I furthecertify that any ensuing program and activity will be conducted in accordance with all applicable Federal and State laws and

    regulations, application guidelines and instructions, the Provisions and Assurances, Debarment and Suspension, lobbying requirementSpecial Provisions and Assurances, and the schedules attached as applicable. It is understood by the applicant that this applicationconstitutes an offer and, if accepted by the Agency or renegotiated to acceptance, will form a binding agreement.

    Authorized OfficialTyped First Name Initial Last Name Title

    Terry W. Smith Executive Director

    Phone Fax Email Signature/Date signed(blue ink preferred)

    (210) 370-5200 (210) 370-5753 [email protected]

    Only the legally responsible party may sign this application.

    6 complete copies of the application, at least 3 with original signature(s), must be received by 5:00 p.m., Thursday, July 9, 2009, inthe:

    Texas Education AgencyWilliam B. Travis Bldg. ___________________________Document Control Center, Room 6-108 TEA DOCUMENT CONTROL NO.1701 North Congress AvenueAustin, Texas 78701-1494

    Page 1 of 88 RFA# 701-09-1Copyright Texas Education Agency. All rights reserved. SAS# A860-

  • 8/14/2019 Part4 Application 6 30

    4/222

    For TEA Use Only

    Adjustments and/or annotations madeon this have been confirmed with

    by telephone/FAX onby of TEA.

    TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCYStandard Application System (SAS)

    School Years 2009-2010 and

    2010-2011

    015-950County District N

    Amendment N

    Target Tech in Texas (T3) Collaborative GrantAmerican Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009

    Schedule #1General Information

    Part 2: List of Required Attachments

    For competitive applications, the application will not be reviewed and scored if any of the required attachments do notaccompany the application when it is submitted. Applicants will not be permitted to submit required attachments, orany revisions to those required attachments, after the closing date of the grant. Attach all required attachments to theback of the application as an appendix.

    1

    Proof of Nonprofit Status

    Required for open-enrollment charter schools sponsored by a nonprofit organization

    Current proof of nonprofit status (see instructions and guidelines for acceptable proof) (if applicable)

    2

    Proof of Financial Stability

    Assurance that Audit Requirements for School Districts, Open-Enrollment Charter Schools, and

    ESCs have been met: All public school districts, open-enrollment charter schools, and education servicecenters (ESCs) must be in compliance with submitting the required annual audit for the immediate prior fiscayear to TEA in the time and manner requested by TEA, and the audit must be determined by the TEA Divisionof Financial Audits to be in compliance with the applicable audit standards. All applicants must be deemed byTEA to be financially stable at the initial time of preliminary selection for funding to receive a grant award. ThTEA Division of Financial Audits will determine financial stability based on the required annual audit for theimmediate prior fiscal year.

    3

    Letter of Involvement

    Required of all Collaborative partners that include entities other than LEAs and ESCs (i.e.,

    nonprofit and for-profit organizations, libraries, IHEs):All members of a collaborative that are not LEAs or ESCs (i.e., libraries, nonprofits, for-profits, and IHEs) arerequired to provide copies of letters of involvement to the LEA or ESC acting as fiscal agent of thecollaborative. Letters of involvement must be written on entitys letterhead, outline the roles andresponsibilities the entity intends to fulfill, and at least three copies must be signed by the organizations CEOAn autopen signature is not considered a written signature and will not be accepted. The fiscal agent isrequired to submit any such letters with the application. Failure to submit copies of these letters for eachpartner will result in the deduction of up to 10 points.

    4

    Wavier for Professional Development

    Required if requesting waiver for professional development:

    If requesting a waiver for the required 25% professional development, the waiver must be completed andincluded in the application. See Schedule #4BProfessional Development, Part 3, for the waiver formThis form is ONLY required of applicants applying for a waiver to the professional developmentrequirement.

    5

    Reviewer Information Form

    All applicants are required to complete the reviewer information form and to submit it online by May 15, 2009Please see Part 2: Program Guidelines, Reviewer Information Form, for instructions on how to access andsubmit the form.

    Page 2 of 88 RFA# 701-09-1Copyright Texas Education Agency. All rights reserved. SAS# A860-

    $

    $

  • 8/14/2019 Part4 Application 6 30

    5/222

    For TEA Use OnlyAdjustments and/or annotations madeon this have been confirmed with

    by telephone/FAX onby of TEA.

    TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCYStandard Application System

    (SAS)

    School Years 2009-2010 and2010-2011

    015-950County District N

    Amendment

    Target Tech in Texas (T3) Collaborative GrantAmerican Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009

    Schedule #1General Information

    Part 3: Applicant Information

    Organization InformationOrganization Name

    Education Service Center, Region 20

    Mailing Address Line 1 Mailing Address Line 2 City State Zip Code

    1314 Hines Avenue San Antonio Texas 78208

    U.S. Congressional District Number Primary DUNS Number Central Contractor Registration (CCR) CAGE Code

    Campus Name (if application is for a single campus-based project) Campus Number

    Mailing Address Line 1 Mailing Address Line 2 City State Zip Code

    Applicant ContactsPrimary Contact

    First Name Initial Last Name Title

    Susanna C. Garza Coordinator

    Telephone Fax Email

    (210) 370-5634 (210) 370-5755 [email protected]

    Mailing Address Line 1 Mailing Address Line 2 City State Zip Code

    1314 Hines Ave. San Antonio TX 78208

    Secondary Contact

    First Name Initial Last Name Title

    Jeff Goldhorn Component Director

    Telephone Fax E-mail

    (210) 370-5490 (210) 370-5755 [email protected] Address Line 1 Mailing Address Line 2 City State Zip Code

    1314 Hines Ave. San Antonio TX 78208

    Page 3 of 88 RFA# 701-09-1Copyright Texas Education Agency. All rights reserved. SAS# A860-

  • 8/14/2019 Part4 Application 6 30

    6/222

    For TEA Use Only

    Adjustments and/or annotations madeon this have been confirmed with

    by telephone/FAX onby of TEA.

    TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCYStandard Application System (SAS)

    School Years 2009-2010 and2010-2011

    015-950County District N

    Amendment

    Target Tech in Texas (T3) Collaborative GrantAmerican Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009

    Schedule #2Shared Services Arrangement Certification

    I, as one of the above member district authorized officials, certify that to the best of my knowledge, the informationcontained in this application is correct and complete, that the local education agency (LEA) that I represent hasauthorized me to file this application, and that such authorization action is recorded in the minutes of the agencysboard meeting.

    The participating or intermediate education agency named has been designated as the administrative and fiscal agentfor this project and is authorized to receive and expend funds for the conduct of this project. The fiscal agent isaccountable for all shared services arrangement activities and is therefore responsible for ensuring that all fundsincluding payments to members of shared services arrangements are expended in accordance with applicable laws andregulations.

    All participating agencies have entered into a written shared services agreement which describes the responsibilities of

    the fiscal agent and SSA members, including the refund liability that may result from on-site monitoring or audits andthe final disposition of equipment, facilities, and materials purchased for this project from funds specified below.

    It is understood that the fiscal agent is responsible for the refund for any exceptions taken as a result of on-sitemonitoring or audits; however, based upon the SHARED SERVICES AGREEMENT, which must be on file with the fiscalagent for review, the fiscal agent may have recourse to the member agencies where the discrepancy (ies) occurred.

    Any additional funds that result from an increase will not require additional signatures. Each member identifiedbelow acknowledges accountability for the requirements contained in Schedules #6A and #6F asapplicable. Each member district certifies their agreement to participate in this Shared Services Arrangement, asstated throughout this grant application.

    Participant List

    #County-District #And

    NameAuthorized Official Name

    And SignatureTelephone Number And

    E-Mail AddressFunding Amoun

    Fiscal Agent

    1

    Education ServiceCenter, Region20

    Terry W. Smith (210) 370-5200

    015950

    Signature

    [email protected]

    $1,000,000

    Member Districts

    2

    Hondo ISD Clay Rosenbaum (830) 426-3027

    163904Signature

    [email protected]

    3

    Sabinal ISD Richard Grill (830) 988-2472

    232902

    Signature

    [email protected]

    4

    Southside ISD Dr. Juan A. Jasso (210) 882-1600

    015917

    Signature

    [email protected]

    5

    Signature

    Page 4 of 88 RFA# 701-09-1Copyright Texas Education Agency. All rights reserved. SAS# A860-

  • 8/14/2019 Part4 Application 6 30

    7/222

    For TEA Use OnlyAdjustments and/or annotations madeon this have been confirmed with

    by telephone/FAX onby of TEA.

    TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCYStandard Application System (SAS)

    School Years 2009-2010 and2010-2011

    County District N

    Amendment

    Target Tech in Texas (T3) Collaborative GrantAmerican Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009

    Schedule #2 - Shared Services Arrangement

    Participant List

    #County-District #

    And Name

    Authorized OfficialName

    And Signature

    Telephone NumberAnd e-Mail Address

    Funding Amount

    Member Districts6

    Signature

    7

    Signature

    8

    Signature

    9

    Signature

    10

    Signature 11

    Signature

    12

    Signature

    13

    Signature

    14

    Signature

    15

    Signature

    16

    Signature

    17 Signature

    18

    Signature

    19

    Signature

    20

    Signature

    21

    Signature

    22

    Signature

    23

    Signature

    24Signature

    25

    Signature

    Page 5 of 88 RFA# 701-09-1Copyright Texas Education Agency. All rights reserved. SAS# A860-

  • 8/14/2019 Part4 Application 6 30

    8/222

    For TEA Use OnlyAdjustments and/or annotations madeon this have been confirmed with

    by telephone/FAX onby of TEA.

    TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCYStandard Application System (SAS)

    School Years 2009-2010 and2010-2011

    015-950County District N

    Amendment

    * Administrative costs are limited to 3%, including direct and indirect costs.

    Page 6 of 88 RFA# 701-09-1Copyright Texas Education Agency. All rights reserved. SAS# A860-

    Target Tech in Texas (T3) Collaborative GrantAmerican Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009

    Schedule #3Purpose of Amendment

    Part 1: Schedules AmendedWhen submitting a revision or an amendment, please indicate what schedules were revised/amended and thejustification for the revisions/amendments made to this application:

    Schedules Changed (Check all schedules that are being amended.):

    Schedule #1General Information Schedule #4FPrivate Nonprofit Schools

    Schedule #2Certification of Shared ServicesArrangement

    Schedule #5Program Budget Summary

    Schedule #3Purpose of Amendment Schedule #5BPayroll Costs 6100

    Schedule #4Prog Summ./App Reqs.Schedule #5CProfessional and Contracted Services6200

    Schedule #4AProg Abstract: Coll. Partners Schedule #5DSupplies and Materials 6300

    Schedule #4BProgram Description Schedule #5EOther Operating Costs 6400

    Schedule #4C Performance Assessment andEvaluation

    Schedule #5GCapital Outlay 6600 (Exclusive of 6619and 6629)

    Schedule #4DEquitable Access andParticipation

    The last day to submit an amendment to TEA is 90days prior to the ending date of the grant.

    Part 2: Revised Budget

    Complete this part if there are any budgetary changes.A B C D

    LineNo.

    Sch.No.

    Class/Object Code

    Grant Project CostsPreviously Approved

    Budget Amount Deleted Amount Added New Budget

    01 5B 6100 $ $ $ $

    02 5C 620003 5D 6300

    04 5E 6400

    05 5F 6500

    06 5G 6600

    07 5H 6629

    08 Total Direct Costs $ $ $ $

    09 *Indirect Cost ( %)

    10 Total Costs $ $ $ $

    $

  • 8/14/2019 Part4 Application 6 30

    9/222

    For TEA Use OnlyAdjustments and/or annotations madeon this have been confirmed with

    by telephone/FAX onby of TEA.

    TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCYStandard Application System (SAS)

    School Years 2009-2010 and2010-2011

    015-950County District N

    Amendment

    Target Tech in Texas (T3) Collaborative GrantAmerican Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009

    Schedule #3Purpose of Amendment

    Part 3: Grant Amendment Request

    All Grants Regardless of Dollar AmountReason for Amendment Request1. Addition of a class/object code not previously budgeted on the Budget Summary.

    2. Increase or decrease the amount approved in any class/object code on Schedule #5Budget Summary (i.e.,6100-6600) by more than 25% of the current amount approved in the class/object code.

    3. Addition of a new line item on any of the supporting budget schedules (i.e., Schedules #5B-5G).

    4. Increase or decrease in the number of positions budgeted on Payroll Costs (Schedule #5B).

    5. Addition of a new item of computer hardware/equipment (not capitalized) approved on Supplies and Material(Schedule #5C).

    6. Addition of a new item or increase in quantity of capital outlay item(s) $5,000 approved on Capital Outlay(Schedule #5G) for articles costing $5,000 or more.

    7. Addition of a new item of capital outlay items approved on Capital Outlay (Schedule #5G) for articles costingless than $5,000.

    8. Reduction of funds allotted for training costs

    9. Change in construction costs

    10. Additional funds needed

    11. Change in scope of objectives, regardless of whether there is an associated budget revision requiring priorapproval

    12. Request to extend the ending date of thegrant

    From EndingDate:

    To ExtendedDate:

    Part 4: Amendment Justification

    Reminder: Must maintain 25% professional development requirement.

    The last day to submit an amendment to TEA is 90 days prior to the ending date of the grant.

    Page 7 of 88 RFA# 701-09-1Copyright Texas Education Agency. All rights reserved. SAS# A860-

  • 8/14/2019 Part4 Application 6 30

    10/222

    For TEA Use OnlyAdjustments and/or annotations madeon this have been confirmed with

    by telephone/FAX onby of TEA.

    TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCYStandard Application System (SAS)

    School Years 2009-2010 and2010-2011

    015-950County District N

    Amendment

    Target Tech in Texas (T3) Collaborative GrantAmerican Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009

    Schedule #4Program Summary and Application Requirements

    Part 1: Summary of Program

    Purpose and Goals

    The purpose of this RFA is to solicit grant applications from eligible applicants to implement programs that will stimulatthe use of educational technology to improve teaching and learning. Grant funds are to be used to assist schools inproviding 21st Century classrooms as envisioned by the Long-Range Plan for Technology, 2006-2020 (LRPT), availableonline at (http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/technology/lrpt/LRPTCompleteDec06.pdf). The LRPT is designed to guide TexasLocal Education Agencies (LEAs) in the effective use of technology to prepare students to learn and work in the 21st

    century.

    To achieve this goal, Texas schools must assess their technology needs and implement programs that make substantiaprogress in meeting the Target Tech level on the Texas Campus and Teacher School Technology and Readiness (STaR)Charts. Providing students with the necessary advanced technologies, educational technology programs and practices,and well-trained teachers will enable schools to use innovative teaching strategies designed to engage students andpromote critical thinking, problem solving, creativity, and college and career readiness.

    TEA encourages LEAs to submit an application as a collaborative and will provide priority points to collaborativeapplicants. Three or more high-need LEAs included in the collaborative will receive additional priority points.Collaboration encourages the development of relationships so that LEAs are not working in isolation, but instead aresearching out and identifying common needs, goals, and resolutions to create broader participation within thecommunity to help move LEAs toward 21st Century classrooms.

    Benefits of collaboration include:

    Cost: Collaboration takes advantage of the economy of scale, in which the cost per student served decreases a

    the number of students served increases.

    Support: The high-need LEA receives more direct access to the experience, expertise, and resources of its

    collaborating partners, who can provide the high-need LEA with assistance in critical areas such as professionadevelopment and training, leadership, and technical support.

    Enhancement of existing programs: The partners that collaborate with the high-need LEA are able to use T

    Collaborative GrantARRA funds to enhance the educational technology services they already offer (providingthey use T3 Collaborative GrantARRA funds to supplement and not supplant, funds they already receive).

    Allowable Activities

    The activities and use of funds that are allowable under the T3 Collaborative GrantARRA may include but are notlimited to the following:

    External evaluation services

    Costs of activities to support LEAs in making substantial progress toward the Target Tech level of the Texas STa

    Chart

    Costs for grant leaders (a minimum of two people) to attend two annual Target Tech in Texas CollaborativeGrant Leadership Conferences, i.e., in school year in school year 2009-2010 and 2010-2011. Professional Development

    Page 8 of 88 RFA# 701-09-1Copyright Texas Education Agency. All rights reserved. SAS# A860-

    http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/technology/lrpt/LRPTCompleteDec06.pdfhttp://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/technology/lrpt/LRPTCompleteDec06.pdf
  • 8/14/2019 Part4 Application 6 30

    11/222

    For TEA Use Only

    Adjustments and/or annotations madeon this have been confirmed with

    by telephone/FAX onby of TEA.

    TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCYStandard Application System (SAS)

    School Years 2009-2010 and2010-2011

    015-950County District N

    Amendment

    Target Tech in Texas (T3) Collaborative GrantAmerican Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009

    Schedule #4Program Summary and Application Requirements

    Part 2: Needs Assessment and Sustainability Requirements

    # Requirement Description Schedule

    1

    Describe the needs identified in the assessment of Texas Campus and Teacher STaRCharts, or the common needs of the LEAs if applying as a collaborative, and identifywhich of the defined Focus Areas you anticipate incorporating into your grant programthat will help each LEAmake substantial progress in meeting Target Tech level.

    Schedule #4ANeeds Assessmentand Sustainability

    2Describe how the choice of Focus Areas addresses the Technology Plan(s) of the high-need LEA, or all LEAs if applying as collaborative,

    Schedule #4ANeeds Assessmentand Sustainability

    3Describe the long-term plans for sustainability of the programs and practices thatfunding under this one-time stimulus funding opportunity will make possible.

    Schedule #4ANeeds Assessmentand Sustainability

    Part 3: NCLB Title II, Part D, Requirements

    # Requirement Description Schedule

    1

    Describe how you will use funds to improve the student academic achievement,

    including technology literacy, of all students attending schools served by the LEA and toimprove the capacity of all teachers to integrate technology effectively into curricula andinstruction.

    Schedule #4BProgramDescription: NCLB Title II, Part D,Requirements

    2

    Describe your specific goals for using advanced technology to improve student academicachievement aligned with challenging State academic content and student academicachievement standards.

    Schedule #4BProgramDescription: NCLB Title II, Part D,Requirements

    3

    Describe the steps you will take to ensure that all students and teachers in schoolsserved by the LEA involved have increased access to educational technology, includinghow the LEA would use funds (such as combining the funds with funds from othersources) to help ensure that(A) students in high-poverty and high-needs schools, orschools identified under Section 1116, have access to technology; and (B) teachers areprepared to integrate technology effectively into curricula and instruction.

    Schedule #4BProgramDescription: NCLB Title II, Part D,Requirements

    4

    Describe how you will(A) identify and promote curricula and teaching strategies thatintegrate technology effectively into curricula and instruction, based on a review ofrelevant research, leading to improvements in student academic achievement, as

    measured by challenging State academic content and student academic achievementstandards; and (B) provide ongoing, sustained professional development for applicable

    teachers, principals, administrators, and school library media personnel serving the localeducational agency, to further the effective use of technology in the classroom or librarymedia center, including, if applicable, a list of the entities that will be partners with thelocal educational agency involved in providing the ongoing, sustained professionaldevelopment.

    Schedule #4BProgramDescription: NCLB Title II, Part D,Requirements

    5

    Describe the type and costs of technologies to be acquired, including services, software,and digital curricula, and including specific provisions for interoperability amongcomponents of such technologies.

    Schedule #4BProgramDescription: NCLB Title II, Part D,Requirements

    6

    Describe how you will coordinate activities carried out with grant funds with technology-related activities carried out with funds available from other federal, state, and localsources.

    Schedule #4BProgramDescription: NCLB Title II, Part D,Requirements

    7

    Describe how you will integrate technology (including software and other electronically

    delivered learning materials) into curricula and instruction, and a timeline for suchintegration.

    Schedule #4BProgramDescription: NCLB Title II, Part D,Requirements

    8

    Describe how you will encourage the development and utilization of innovative strategiesfor the delivery of specialized or rigorous academic courses and curricula through theuse of technology, and, if applicable, distance learning technologies, particularly forthose areas that would not otherwise have access to such courses and curricula due togeographical isolation or insufficient resources.

    Schedule #4BProgramDescription: NCLB Title II, Part D,Requirements

    9

    Describe how you will ensure the effective use of technology to promote parental

    involvement and increase communication with parents, including a description of howparents will be informed of the technology being applied in their childs education so thatthe parents are able to reinforce at home the instruction their child receives at school.

    Schedule #4BProgramDescription: NCLB Title II, Part D,Requirements

    Page 9 of 88 RFA# 701-09-1Copyright Texas Education Agency. All rights reserved. SAS# A860-

  • 8/14/2019 Part4 Application 6 30

    12/222

    For TEA Use OnlyAdjustments and/or annotations madeon this have been confirmed with

    by telephone/FAX onby of TEA.

    TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCYStandard Application System (SAS)

    School Years 2009-2010 and2010-2011

    015-950County District N

    Amendment

    Target Tech in Texas (T3) Collaborative GrantAmerican Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009

    Schedule #4Program Summary and Application Requirements

    # Part 3: NCLB Title II, Part D, Requirements (cont.) Schedule

    10Describe how programs will be developed, where applicable, in collaboration with adultliteracy service providers, to maximize the use of technology.

    Schedule #4BProgramDescription: NCLB Title II, PartD, Requirements

    11

    Describe the process and accountability measures that you will use to evaluate the extentto which activities funded under the grant are effective in integrating technology intocurricula and instruction, increasing the ability of teachers to teach, and enabling studentsto meet challenging state academic content and student academic achievement standards.

    Schedule #4BProgramDescription: NCLB Title II, PartD, Requirements

    12

    Describe the supporting resources (such as services, software, other electronicallydelivered learning materials, and print resources) that will be acquired to ensuresuccessful and effective uses of technology.

    Schedule #4BProgramDescription: NCLB Title II, PartD, Requirements

    13

    Describe how you will meet the Title II, Part D, requirement to use not less than25% ofawarded grant funds to provide ongoing, sustained, and intensive, high-quality

    professional development. The recipient shall provide professional development in theintegration of advanced technologies, including emerging technologies, into curricula and

    instruction and in using those technologies to create new learning environments, such asprofessional development in the use of technologya. to access data and resources to develop curricula and instructional materialsb. to enable teachers

    i. to use the Internet and other technology to communicate with parents, otherteachers, principals, and administrators; and

    ii. to retrieve Internet-based learning resourcesc. to lead to improvements in classroom instruction in the core academic subjects, that

    effectively prepare students to meet challenging State academic content standards,including increasing student technology literacy, and student academic achievementstandards

    d. to teach effectively in the online environmente. to serve as an effective on-site facilitator for online courses.

    Schedule #4BProgram

    Description: NCLB Title II, PartD, Requirements

    14

    Applicants who can demonstrate the applicant already provides sufficient professionaldevelopment may request a waiver.The applicant must demonstrate to the satisfaction of TEA through a properly prepared

    and approved waiver that the grantee already provides ongoing, sustained, and intensive,high-quality professional development that is based on a review of relevant research, toall teachers in core academic subjects in the integration of advanced technologies,including emerging technologies, into curricula and instruction. In addition, applicantsmust demonstrate that all educators currently meet the SBEC standards for beginningteachers that include the technology application standards I-V to be eligible for the waiver.

    The applicant must provide a complete and specific description of the following:a. How professional development in technology is:

    i. Ongoingii. Sustained (not stand-alone sessions)iii. Intensiveiv. High-qualityv. Based on review of relevant research

    vi. Provided to all teachers on the participating campuses in core academic subjectsvii. Focuses on the integration of advanced technologies, including emerging

    technologies, into curricula and instructionb. A statement that all educators on the participating campuses currently meet the

    SBEC standards for beginning teachers that include the technology applicationstandards I-V.

    c. Applicants must assure their professional development meets the definition ofprofessional development in Schedule #6EProvisions and Assurances for No ChildLeft Behind.

    The waiver is subject to review and approval by TEA. In the event the waiver is notapproved, and the grantee is selected for funding, the grantee will be required to revisethe application to incorporate 25% of the funds to be used for professional development.

    Schedule #4BProgram

    Description: ProfessionalDevelopment

    Page 10 of 88 RFA# 701-09-1Copyright Texas Education Agency. All rights reserved. SAS# A860-

  • 8/14/2019 Part4 Application 6 30

    13/222

    For TEA Use Only

    Adjustments and/or annotations madeon this have been confirmed with

    by telephone/FAX onby of TEA.

    TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCYStandard Application System (SAS)

    School Years 2009-2010 and2010-2011

    015-950County District N

    Amendment

    Target Tech in Texas (T3) Collaborative GrantAmerican Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009

    Schedule #4Program Summary and Application Requirements

    Part 4: Target Tech Requirements

    1

    Describe how you anticipate that the curriculum redesign plan will include ways

    to transform curriculum and instruction by providing opportunities in the

    classroom, school libraries, and home that would not be possible without

    technology.

    Schedule #4BProgramDescription: Curriculum anInstruction

    2

    Describe how you anticipate that the curriculum redesign plan will involve

    teachers, curriculum and technology specialists, and school librarians so as to

    help teach strategies for creating new learning environments that incorporate

    technology.

    Schedule #4BProgramDescription: Curriculum anInstruction

    3

    Describe in detail the high-quality professional development plan you anticipateimplementing. The intended outcome of this plan would be to move teachers,librarians, administrators, and other school leaders to Target Tech level of the

    Texas STaR Chart. Describe how you anticipate meeting the followingrequirements of a high-quality professional development plan:

    a. Teachers must complete at least 18 hours of professionaldevelopment each year of the grant on the use of educationaltechnologies to improve teaching and learning.

    b. The professional development selected must be a research-basedmodel and include detailed plans for implementation.

    c. The professional development model must be ongoing and must notbe dependent on specific hardware or software but rather focus onpedagogical strategies for classroom instruction that includesmentors/coaches, through the use of technology.

    d. The professional development provider must be available to provideongoing support throughout the duration of the program.

    Schedule #4BProgramDescription: ProfessionalDevelopment

    4

    Describe how you anticipate providing leadership support in accordance with the

    following requirements:a. Administrators must complete at least 12 hours of educational

    technology leadership training each year of the grant to makesubstantial progress to meet the Target Tech levels of progress onthe Campus STaR Chart.

    b. Administrators must allow time for teachers to attend professional

    development and Curriculum redesign meetings, allowing forsubstitute teachers when necessary.

    c. Administrators must hold teachers accountable for implementing thepedagogical strategies provided in professional development on theeffective use of technology.

    d. Administrators must follow all evaluation requirements outlined inthe grant.

    Schedule #4BProgramDescription: ProjectManagement

    Page 11 of 88 RFA# 701-09-1Copyright Texas Education Agency. All rights reserved. SAS# A860-

  • 8/14/2019 Part4 Application 6 30

    14/222

    For TEA Use OnlyAdjustments and/or annotations madeon this have been confirmed with

    by telephone/FAX onby of TEA.

    TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCYStandard Application System (SAS)

    School Years 2009-2010 and2010-2011

    015-950County District N

    Amendment

    Target Tech in Texas (T3) Collaborative GrantAmerican Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009

    Schedule #4Program Summary and Application Requirements

    Part 5: Infrastructure and Implementation Requirements

    # Requirement Description Schedule

    1

    Provide a detailed analysis of strengths and weaknesses of existinginfrastructure, along with a description of how weaknesses will be addressed inorder to ensure that appropriate infrastructure exists to support districtstechnology goals.

    Schedule #4BProgramDescription: Infrastructureand Implementation

    2

    Describe how you will provide strategies for the project that accommodateflexible implementation and include time for collaboration, communication,adjustments, and feedback during the course of the program.

    Schedule #4BProgramDescription: Infrastructureand Implementation

    3

    If you are currently receiving Vision 2020 project funding or have applied forfunding under Vision 2020, Cycle 2, describe how project management will beconducted so as to keep T3 Collaborative GrantARRA funding activities

    separate from those of the Vision 2020 grant while still implementing theprogram and providing services effectively.

    Schedule #4BProgramDescription: Infrastructure

    and Implementation

    4

    Provide evidence that the project director in each participating district hassufficient, dedicated time for program activities. Grantees receiving fundingfrom other Title II, Part D, funding sources (such as Vision 2020, Cycle 1 or 2)must describe their plans for budgeting and documenting expenses separatelyfor each Title II, Part D, project.

    Schedule #4BProgramDescription: Infrastructureand Implementation

    5

    Describe how you will ensure that teachers involved are well informed of allaspects of program plans; that roles and responsibilities of all participants areclearly defined; and plans are in place to keep all program participants informedof project progress, problems, and changes.

    Schedule #4BProgramDescription: Infrastructureand Implementation

    6

    Describe your strategies to address changes in policy due to issues that mayarise during the program.

    Schedule #4BProgramDescription: Infrastructureand Implementation

    7

    The LEAs readiness to implement and support this program beginning inOctober 2009.

    Schedule #4BProgramDescription: Infrastructureand Implementation

    Yes Applicant verifies that all requirements are met in these program narrative component descriptions andactivities.

    Page 12 of 88 RFA# 701-09-1Copyright Texas Education Agency. All rights reserved. SAS# A860-

    $

  • 8/14/2019 Part4 Application 6 30

    15/222

    For TEA Use Only

    Adjustments and/or annotations madeon this have been confirmed with

    by telephone/FAX onby of TEA.

    TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCYStandard Application System (SAS)

    School Years 2009-2010 and2010-2011

    015-950County District N

    Amendment

    Target Tech in Texas (T3) Collaborative GrantAmerican Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009

    Schedule #4Program Summary and Application Requirements

    Part 6: Program Assurances

    # Assurance Description

    1

    Childrens Internet Protection Act (CIPA) Certification - The applicant must certify by entering an X inthe appropriate box below that one of the following conditions exists. The signature of the authorized official oSchedule #1 incorporates this certification.

    See http://www.sl.universalservice.org/reference/CIPA.asp for CIPA statute.

    Every applicable school has complied with the CIPA requirements in Title II, Part D, Subpart 4

    Not all applicable schools have yet complied with the requirements in Title II, Part D, Subpart 4

    a. the LEA is undertaking such action, including any necessary procurement procedures to putin place an Internet safety policy for each applicable school that meets the requirements andwill certify in the application for funds that it is in compliance, (a copy of the plan for coming

    into compliance by the beginning of the school year is attached to this schedule); or

    b. the LEA has received a one-year waiver from the U.S. Secretary of Education under section2441(b)(2)(C) of the ESEA for those applicable schools not yet in compliance. A copy of thewaiver is attached to this schedule

    The CIPA requirements in the ESEA do not apply because no funds made available under the program arbeing used to purchase computers to access the Internet, or to pay for direct costs associated withaccessing the Internet, for elementary and secondary schools that do not receive e-rate services under theCommunications Act of 1934, as amended. (An applicable school is an elementary or secondary schoolthat does notreceive e-rate discounts and for which Ed Tech fund are used to purchase computers, used to

    access the Internet, or to pay the direct costs associated with accessing the Internet.)For competitiveapplications, the application will not be reviewed and scored if any of the required attachments do notaccompany the application when it is submitted. Applicants will not be permitted to submit requiredattachments, or any revisions to those required attachments, after the closing date of the grant. Attach al

    required attachments to the back of the application as an appendix.

    2The applicant must provide assurance that financial assistance provided underthis grant will supplement, and not supplant, state and local funds.

    See Schedule #6FProgram-Specific Provisionsand Assurances

    3

    The applicant must provide assurance that it will assess the Texas Campus andTeacher STaR Charts and that on the basis of that assessment, it will selectFocus Areas for the grant that are best suited to moving the high-need LEAtoward Target Tech level and to meeting the goals of the Long-Range Plan forTechnology (LRPT, online athttp://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/technology/lrpt/LRPTCompleteDec06.pdf).

    If applying as a collaborative, the applicant must provide assurance that it willassess the Texas Campus and Teacher STaR Charts for every LEA in the

    collaborative and that on the basis of that assessment, it will select Focus Areasfor the grant that focus on the needs of the high-need LEA(s) while moving allLEAs in the collaborative toward Target Tech level and to meeting the goals ofthe Long-Range Plan for Technology

    See Schedule #6FProgram-Specific Provisionsand Assurances

    4

    The applicant must provide assurance that it will oversee a curriculum redesignprocess to ensure that districts are providing 21st Century classroom curriculum,as described in the LRPT (online athttp://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/technology/lrpt/LRPTCompleteDec06.pdf).

    See Schedule #6FProgram-Specific Provisionsand Assurances

    5The applicant must provide assurance that all districts in the collaborative willsubmit a curriculum redesign plan in conjunction with their first progress report.

    See Schedule #6FProgram-Specific Provisionsand Assurances

    Page 13 of 88 RFA# 701-09-1Copyright Texas Education Agency. All rights reserved. SAS# A860-

    $

    http://www.sl.universalservice.org/reference/CIPA.asphttp://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/technology/lrpt/LRPTCompleteDec06.pdfhttp://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/technology/lrpt/LRPTCompleteDec06.pdfhttp://www.sl.universalservice.org/reference/CIPA.asphttp://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/technology/lrpt/LRPTCompleteDec06.pdfhttp://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/technology/lrpt/LRPTCompleteDec06.pdf
  • 8/14/2019 Part4 Application 6 30

    16/222

    For TEA Use OnlyAdjustments and/or annotations madeon this have been confirmed with

    by telephone/FAX onby of TEA.

    TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCYStandard Application System (SAS)

    School Years 2009-2010 and2010-2011

    015-950County District N

    Amendment

    Target Tech in Texas (T3) Collaborative GrantAmerican Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009

    Schedule #4Program Summary and Application Requirements

    Part 6: Program Assurances (cont.)

    # Assurance Description

    6

    The applicant must provide assurance that districts will be provided with thenecessary infrastructure to support 21st Century classrooms and enhancestudent instruction, as described in the LRPT (online athttp://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/technology/lrpt/LRPTCompleteDec06.pdf).

    See Schedule #6FProgram-Specific Provisionsand Assurances

    7The applicant must provide assurance that districts will be provided withappropriate technical and pedagogical support.

    See Schedule #6FProgram-Specific Provisionsand Assurances

    8

    The applicant must provide assurance that it will identify and budget for grantleaders (a minimum of two people) to attend two annual Target Tech in TexasCollaborative Grant Leadership Conferences for two years, i.e., in school year2009-2010 and 2010-2011. The first conference will be held in Austin, Texas,on October 13 and 14. Applicants should budget for a total of 3 days foreach year of the conference.

    See Schedule #6FProgram-Specific Provisionsand Assurances

    9

    The applicant must provide assurance that it will contract with an externalevaluator to evaluate the program, and that it will expend no more than 8% ofthe total grant award on evaluation services. The evaluation must beconducted by an evaluator who has the capability to remain independent andobjective in carrying out the evaluation. Independent and objective impliesthat there is no influence or control, real or perceived, exerted on theevaluator by any person who is involved in the provision of program services.Therefore, the only way in which a contracted evaluator can be trulyindependent and objective is to not be involved in any manner in the provisionof program services or activities.

    See Schedule #6FProgram-Specific Provisionsand Assurances

    10

    Public Law 107-110, Section 9521 states a local educational agency mayreceive funds under a covered program for any fiscal year only if the Stateeducational agency finds that either the combined fiscal effort per student orthe aggregate expenditures of such agency and the State with respect to theprovision of free public education by such agency for the preceding fiscal yearwas not less than 90 percent of such combined fiscal effort or aggregateexpenditures for the second preceding fiscal year.LEAsare responsible for maintaining effort and for documenting maintenanceof effort(MOE). TEA will verify each LEAs MOE using information obtainedfrom the PEIMS database. TEA staff will notify the applicant in the event fiscaleffort has not been maintained. The final grant amount will be reduced inexact proportion by which the LEA fails to meet 90 percent of the combinedfiscal effort per student and aggregate expenditures (using the measure more

    favorable to the LEA. [P. L. 107-110, Title IX, Section 9521.]

    See Schedule #6FProgram-Specific Provisionsand Assurances

    11

    The applicant must provide assurance that it will meet the Title II, Part D,requirement, or submit a waiver, that a grantee shall use not less than25%

    of awarded grant funds to provide ongoing, sustained, and intensive, high-quality professional development. The recipient shall provide professionaldevelopment in the integration of advanced technologies, including emergingtechnologies, into curricula and instruction and in using those technologies tocreate new learning environments, such as professional development in theuse of technology.

    See Schedule #6ENCLBAct Provisions andAssurances

    YesThe applicant must certify adherence to the above Program Assurances by entering an X in the box to theleft noting agreement with a Yes. The signature of the authorized official on Schedule #1 incorporates thisagreement.

    Page 14 of 88 RFA# 701-09-1Copyright Texas Education Agency. All rights reserved. SAS# A860-

    $

    http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/technology/lrpt/LRPTCompleteDec06.pdfhttp://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/technology/lrpt/LRPTCompleteDec06.pdf
  • 8/14/2019 Part4 Application 6 30

    17/222

    For TEA Use Only

    Adjustments and/or annotations madeon this page have been confirmed with

    by telephone/FAX onby of TEA.

    TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCYStandard Application System (SAS)

    School Years 2009-2010 and2010-2011

    015-950County District N

    Amendment N

    Target Tech in Texas (T3) Collaborative GrantAmerican Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009

    Schedule #4AProgram Abstract: Collaborating Partners

    This schedule only required if applying as a collaborative

    Required of all collaborative partners that include entities other than LEAs and ESCs (i.e., nonprofit and forprofit organizations, libraries, IHEs):

    Duplicating as necessary, complete a copy of this page for each member of the collaborative that is not an LEA or ESC(i.e., libraries, nonprofits, for-profits, and IHEs). For each collaborating partner listed in this schedule, a Letter ofInvolvement must accompany the each copy of the application. Letter of Involvement must be written on entitysletterhead and must outline the roles and responsibilities the entity intends to fulfill. At least three copies must containthe original signature of the CEO or highest practicable officer. An autopen signature is not considered an originalsignature and will not be accepted. The fiscal agent is required to submit any such letters with the application.

    N/AApplicant verifies that the collaborative for this grant application includes only LEA(s) andESC(s). If checking this box, applicant should leave this schedule blank and continue to Schedule #4BProgram Description: Needs Assessment and Sustainability.

    Name of Partnering Organization:

    Describe the main roles and responsibilities of partnering organization. Responses are limited to the spaceprovided, front side only, with a font size no smaller than 9 point (Arial or Verdana).

    Describe the underlying rationale/research for including the partner in the project. Responses are limited tothe space provided, front side only, with a font size no smaller than 9 point (Arial or Verdana).

    Page 15 of 88 RFA# 701-09-1Copyright Texas Education Agency. All rights reserved. SAS# A860-

  • 8/14/2019 Part4 Application 6 30

    18/222

    For TEA Use Only

    Adjustments and/or annotations madeon this have been confirmed with

    by telephone/FAX onby of TEA.

    TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCYStandard Application System (SAS)

    School Years 2009-2010 and2010-2011

    015-950County District N

    Amendment

    Target Tech in Texas (T3) Collaborative GrantAmerican Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009

    Schedule #4BProgram Description: Needs Assessment and Sustainability

    Part 1: Needs AssessmentRequirement 1: Describe the needs identified in the assessment of Texas Campus and Teacher STaR Charts, or thecommon needs of the LEAs if applying as a collaborative, and identify which of the defined Focus Areas you anticipateincorporating into your grant programthat will help each LEAmake substantial progress in meeting Target Tech level.Responses are limited to the space provided, front side only, with a font size no smaller than 9 point (Arial or Verdana)

    All three of the districts participating in the ESC-20 collaborative Hondo, Sabinal and Southside- have a similar percenof children living in poverty (between 26 and 28%). Two of the districts -Hondo and Southside- are in some stage ofNCLB, Title I school improvement for Mathematics at their high schools (stage 2 in Hondo and stage 3 in Southside). Athree have identified Mathematics and Science as critical core content areas where students do not perform well ingeneral. Due to barriers such as low socioeconomic status and teacher quality, these districts have gaps in studentperformance in Mathematics and/or Science when you compare results to the state and region.

    2008 TAKS Data (TX- Texas; R20- Region 20; H- Hondo ISD; Sa- Sabinal ISD; S- Southside ISD):

    Mathematics Grade 5 Mathematics Grade 6 Mathematics Grade 7 Mathematics Grade 8

    TX R20 H Sa S TX R20 H Sa S TX R20 H Sa S TX R20 H Sa S

    86 86 87 74 76 83 81 76 96 79 80 77 84 94 77 79 78 85 90 73

    Science Grade 5 Science Grade 8

    TX R20 H Sa S TX R20 H Sa S

    82 81 79 69 71 69 69 63 57 62

    In addition there is a significant achievement gap between boys and girls in both content areas, grades 5 through 11 fothese districts. As a result, the consensus is to focus on the areas of Mathematics and Science in grades 5 through 8 inorder to establish a solid foundation, build confidence and self-esteem, and increase student preparedness for highschool. Curriculum in both areas will be enhanced with the meaningful and effective use of technology as well asstronger pedagogical skills. As a result, two participating campuses have been identified at each district: WoollsIntermediate and McDowell Middle School in Hondo ISD, Sabinal Elementary and Secondary campuses, and LosoyaIntermediate and Matthey Middle School in Southside ISD.

    STaR Chart results comparisons of the last 3 years at the above mentioned campuses show the following:- Technology infrastructure has improved overall; some focus areas are rated 4; the lowest rating is at Southside;

    - Administrative support has remained at the same level at Southside and Sabinal but increased at Hondo;- Teaching & Learning and Educator Preparation have showed minimal improvement and remained at an average of 2;- Overall middle school campus averages are slightly higher than at elementary campuses.The focus areas identified for this grant program are (1) Grades K-8 Technology Applications TEKS, CurriculumConnections, Implementation, and Mastery; (2) Leadership, Planning, Support and Communication; and (3) SchoolLibraries. We believe these focus areas will greatly benefit all campuses identified by improving academic achievementin Mathematics and Science (and indirectly all content areas) as well as technology literacy through the meaningful andeffective use of technology tools and resources, pedagogical skills and classroom management, leadership vision andsupport, and a strong collaboration between teachers, librarians and instructional technologists. ESC-20 InstructionalTechnology Specialists and Library Services Specialist will prepare teachers to teach with technology and librarians toteach information literacy through formal training, online learning, collaboration, coaching, mentoring, modeling andobservations. ESC-20 support will be ongoing and sustained, allowing for the introduction of new skills, tools and

    strategies in a progressive manner throughout the duration of the grant period.

    Selected Focus Area(s)

    Grades K-8 Technology Applications TEKS,Curriculum Connections, Implementation, andMastery

    Technology, Networks, and Technical Support

    Grades 9-12 Content Area Connections andTransformed Teaching Practices

    Online Learning

    Grades 9-12 Technology Applications Courses, 19TAC Chapter 126

    School Libraries

    Leadership, Planning, Support, and Communication

    Page 16 of 88 RFA# 701-09-1Copyright Texas Education Agency. All rights reserved. SAS# A860-

    $

    $

    $

  • 8/14/2019 Part4 Application 6 30

    19/222

    For TEA Use OnlyAdjustments and/or annotations madeon this have been confirmed with

    by telephone/FAX onby of TEA.

    TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCYStandard Application System (SAS)

    School Years 2009-2010 and2010-2011

    015-950County District N

    Amendment

    Target Tech in Texas (T3) Collaborative GrantAmerican Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009

    Schedule #4BProgram Description: Needs Assessment and Sustainability

    Part 1: Needs Assessment(cont.)

    Requirement #2: Describe how the choice of Focus Areas addresses the Technology Plan(s) of the high-need LEA, orall LEAs if applying as collaborative, Responses are limited to the space provided, front side only, with a font size nosmaller than 9 point (Arial or Verdana).

    The focus areas chosen are aligned with several technology plan goals and objectives of the LEAs participating in thiscollaborative that address all four strands of the Long Range Plan for Technology 2006-2020. Several of these goals

    were also included in campus improvement plans and district strategic plans.

    1) Under Teaching & Learning, strategies include to provide students with technology-rich lessons to support greatelevels of interest, inquiry, analysis, collaboration, creativity, and content production; expand access to technologyhardware, mobile labs, library research centers, classroom presentation tools, and digital resources; and ensure thatcampus libraries sustain a technology-rich environment that enhance student learning. The common goal is to stimulatstudents to work collaboratively in communities of inquiry and knowledge building that propose, assess and implementsolutions to real world problems.

    2) Under Educator Preparation, strategies include to expand high quality professional development withopportunities for technology integration across the curricula that are aligned with challenging academic standards;developing SBEC technology proficiency and active learning with technology; developing a cadre of technology literateteachers to mentor and support others; and using technology to increase communication with student families.3) Under Administrative and Instructional Support, strategies include to provide administrator training ontechnology integration and updated research in teaching and learning; set expectations for the use of technology;provide staff with time and opportunities for Technology Applications training; and model the use of technology.4) Under Infrastructure for Technology, campuses will increase access to technology and add new, emergingtechnologies to maximize learning in 21st Century classrooms. The common goal is to acquire, interconnect, implementimprove and maintain an effective educational technology infrastructure.

    Part 2: Sustainability

    Requirement 3: Describe the long-term plans for sustainability of the programs and practices that funding under thisone-time stimulus funding opportunity will make possible.Responses are limited to the space provided, front side only,

    with a font size no smaller than 9 point (Arial or Verdana).Long term sustainability at Hondo ISD, Sabinal ISD and Southside ISD will be accomplished at multiple levels:1) Classrooms - Participating classrooms will be equipped with 21st Century tools that will be appropriate fortechnology-rich Math and Science learning environments in grades 5 through 8 and introduced in phases. Much of thesclassroom tools will hold value for several years and although they will eventually become obsolete, careful planning inthe project-implementation will maximize the life of the tools installed and will create a standard to continue throughouother campuses.2) Teachersand instructional technologists - Teachers will be equipped with the knowledge and skills needed touse those technology tools effectively and meaningfully to increase understanding, promote inquiry and project-basedlearning, and increase technology literacy. Teachers who participate in the program will become role models andmentors to other staff members, building capacity in them as well. By building these learning skills, they will model lifelong learning as a way of life.3) Libraries Libraries will be equipped with the technology tools and digital resources needed to provide access tocurrent, authoritative information.

    4) Librarians Librarians will be equipped with the knowledge and skills to promote information literacy at theircampus/district and collaborate with classroom teachers and campus instructional technologists in enhancing curriculumwith quality, digital resources and in modeling research skills.5) School leaders - School administrators will be equipped with a vision for the use of technology, skills to usetechnology more effectively, an expectation for the use of technology at their campus/district, and criteria to assess its

    use for daily teaching and learning. School administrators will increase support for instruction across all curricular areaas they become better users of technology themselves and able to recognize good technology implementation.6) Students Students in grades 5-8 Science and Math classrooms will learn technology skills as well as skills for lifethat will be sustained as they get older, and utilize the scientific tools and online research resources in high school andbeyond.7) Curriculum - A strong Math and Science program at the intermediate and middle school grades scaffolds learning ihigh school. Real application of scientific theories through experiments and real-time data collection will pique studentinterest in the world around them.

    Page 17 of 88 RFA# 701-09-1Copyright Texas Education Agency. All rights reserved. SAS# A860-

  • 8/14/2019 Part4 Application 6 30

    20/222

    For TEA Use OnlyAdjustments and/or annotations madeon this have been confirmed with

    by telephone/FAX onby of TEA.

    TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCYStandard Application System (SAS)

    School Years 2009-2010 and2010-2011

    015-950County District N

    Amendment

    Target Tech in Texas (T3) Collaborative GrantAmerican Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009

    Schedule #4BProgram Description: Needs Assessment and Sustainability

    Part 3: District/Campus Participant List (Duplicate page as necessary)# County-District # and District Name Campus # and Name

    1

    163904 Hondo ISD 163904105 Woolls Intermediate School

    Demographic Justification

    167 students in 5th grade

    According to the 2007 U.S. Census data, 26.89%of students at Woolls Intermediate live in familieswith incomes below the poverty line.

    Selection CriteriaThe Campus STaR Chart shows an average of 2 in mostfocus areas, particularly Teaching & Learning. There hasbeen no significant progress in the last 3 years.Both Science and Math scores in 2008-2009 show asignificant gap between White and EconomicallyDisadvantaged students. The gap is wider in Science, withmore than 40% difference.

    2

    163904 Hondo ISD 163904041 McDowell Middle School

    Demographic Justification

    486 students in grades 6-8

    According to the 2007 U.S. Census data, 26.89%of students at McDowell Middle School live infamilies with incomes below the poverty line.

    Selection CriteriaThe Campus STaR Chart shows an average of 2 in mostfocus areas. There has been no significant progress in thelast 3 years, particularly in Teaching & Learning.Both Science and Math scores in 2008-2009 show asignificant gap between White and EconomicallyDisadvantaged students. The gap is wider in Science, withmore than 40% difference.

    McDowell MS feeds into Hondo HS, which is currently onstage 2 of Title I School Improvement for Math.

    3

    232902 Sabinal ISD 232902101 Sabinal Elementary School

    Demographic Justification

    xxx students in grade 5

    According to the 2007 U.S. Census data, 26.37%of students at Sabinal Elementary live in familieswith incomes below the poverty line.

    Selection CriteriaThe Campus STaR Chart shows an average of 2 in Teachingand Learning, with the lowest scores in Educator Preparatioand the highest in Infrastructure. The only significant

    progress in the last 3 years has occurred in Infrastructure.There is a significant difference between White andEconomically Disadvantaged students in Science (29%).Math scores are about 20% lower at the elementary than athe middle school.

    4

    232902 Sabinal ISD 232902041 Sabinal Junior High

    Demographic Justification

    xxx students in grades 6-8

    According to the 2007 U.S. Census data, 26.37%of students at Sabinal Elementary live in familieswith incomes below the poverty line.

    Selection Criteria

    The Campus STaR Chart shows an average of 2 in Teachingand Learning, with the lowest scores in Educator Preparatioand the highest in Infrastructure. Averages in all 4 strands

    are much lower in 2007-2008 than the previous year.Science scores are very low in general (39% for allstudents). Math scores are fairly similar in all sub-populations (80 to 86%).

    Page 18 of 88 RFA# 701-09-1Copyright Texas Education Agency. All rights reserved. SAS# A860-

  • 8/14/2019 Part4 Application 6 30

    21/222

    For TEA Use OnlyAdjustments and/or annotations madeon this have been confirmed with

    by telephone/FAX onby of TEA.

    TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCYStandard Application System (SAS)

    School Years 2009-2010 and2010-2011

    015-950County District N

    Amendment

    Target Tech in Texas (T3) Collaborative GrantAmerican Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009

    Schedule #4BProgram Description: Needs Assessment and Sustainability

    Part 3: District/Campus Participant List (Duplicate page as necessary)# County-District # and District Name Campus # and Name

    1

    015917 Southside ISD 015917103 Losoya Intermediate School

    Demographic Justification

    721 students (grade 5-6)

    According to the 2007 U.S. Census data, 27.34% ofstudents at Losoya Intermediate live in families withincomes below the poverty line.

    Selection CriteriaThe Campus STaR Chart shows developing in all foustrands. The averages have remained very similar ithe last 3 years.Science TAKS scores in 5th grade are low, and girlsperform lower (54.7%) than boys (63.7%). MathTAKS scores in 6th grade are below state and regionaverage (56.6%).

    2

    015917 Southside ISD 015917041 Matthey Middle School

    Demographic Justification

    727 students (grades 7-8)

    According to the 2007 U.S. Census data, 27.34% ofstudents at Matthey Middle School live in families withincomes below the poverty line.

    Selection CriteriaThe Campus STaR Chart shows developing in all foustrands. The averages have remained very similar ithe last 3 years.Science TAKS scores average 65.9% in grade 8.Math scores are 78% in grade 7 and 88.4% in grad8, however Matthey MS feeds into Southside HS,which is currently on stage 3 of Title I SchoolImprovement for Math.

    3

    Demographic Justification

    Selection Criteria

    4

    Demographic Justification

    Selection Criteria

    Page 19 of 88 RFA# 701-09-1Copyright Texas Education Agency. All rights reserved. SAS# A860-

  • 8/14/2019 Part4 Application 6 30

    22/222

    For TEA Use OnlyAdjustments and/or annotations madeon this have been confirmed with

    by telephone/FAX onby of TEA.

    TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCYStandard Application System (SAS)

    School Years 2009-2010 and2010-2011

    015-950County District N

    Amendment

    Target Tech in Texas (T3) Collaborative GrantAmerican Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009

    Schedule #4BProgram Description: NCLB Title II, Part D, RequirementsResponses are limited to the space provided, front side only, with a font size no smaller than 9 point (Arial or Verdana)

    Requirement 1: Describe how you will use funds to improve the student academic achievement, including technologyliteracy, of all students attending schools served by the LEA and to improve the capacity of all teachers to integratetechnology effectively into curricula and instruction.

    Of the total amount awarded in this grant, approximately $400,000 ($200,000 for each year of the grant period) will beused to purchase the necessary technology tools and peripherals to equip all 21st Century classrooms at the 6participating campuses. This includes an estimated 24 interactive whiteboards, 56 response systems, 13 LCD projector18 teacher laptops, 32 document cameras, 36 student computers, 7 Netbook carts, 38 digital cameras, 38 digitalcamcorders, 134 iPod Nanos, 28 science probe sets, 28 library computers, and 44 audio systems. The above resourceswill be distributed at participating campuses in an equitable manner, based on their student population as well as onresources already available of funded locally.

    Two full-time and one part-time ESC-20 Educational Specialists will train teachers at participating campuses through

    frequent onsite support during the school day. This will take place either through modeling and observations duringclassroom time; through coaching, mentoring, and one-on-one training during conference periods; or through onlinelearning. These staff developers will work with teachers, instructional technologists, ibrarians and students. The ESC-20Instructional Technology & Media Coordinator will dedicate 10% of her time to coordinate grant activities, conductadministrator training, facilitate T3 meetings, and prepare all necessary reports. The estimated cost for professionaldevelopment and administrative support is approximately $265,000 for each year of the grant.

    Additional expenditures include indirect costs, grant evaluation, ESC-20 employee travel, non-employee travel,communication, miscellaneous contracted services, and meeting rooms. The estimated total for these expenditures is$35,000.

    Requirement 2: Describe your specific goals for using advanced technology to improve student academic achievemenaligned with challenging State academic content and student academic achievement standards.

    As a collaborative, our vision for learning is that in order for students to develop 21 st Century skills, they must masterboth content and technology literacy skills with the needed proficiency to acquire and analyze information, solve real-world problems and make informed decisions, and communicate new knowledge using technology.

    Higher student performance and deeper engagement in academic, real world Mathematics and Science endeavors willbe accomplished by having access to quality digital tools and resources available as needed as well as strong, engagingteaching practices and project-based learning. Tools, resources and instructional strategies will be appropriate to meeteach digital natives individual strengths, needs and learning styles.

    Technology will not be used for the sake of technology, remediation or productivity, perpetuating existing practices.Rather, it will be seamlessly weaved into everyday teaching and learning, transforming these practices. Appropriatetechnology tools will be selected for each classroom, grade level, and instructional goal, combining traditional and Web2.0 software as well as probes and digital resources to provide opportunities for collaboration, sharing, construction ofnew knowledge, problem-based and inquiry learning, assessments, authentic learning, and the expression of ideas incompelling ways.

    This grant program will positively impact student achievement through technology-rich learning experiences that areengaging, meaningful, challenging, and authentic. The effective use of technology in the classroom will enhancelearning and prepare students to succeed in TAKS in their current grade level, subsequent grade levels and life.

    Page 20 of 88 RFA# 701-09-1Copyright Texas Education Agency. All rights reserved. SAS# A860-

  • 8/14/2019 Part4 Application 6 30

    23/222

    For TEA Use Only

    Adjustments and/or annotations madeon this have been confirmed with

    by telephone/FAX onby of TEA.

    TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCYStandard Application System (SAS)

    School Years 2009-2010 and2010-2011

    015-950County District N

    Amendment

    Target Tech in Texas (T3) Collaborative GrantAmerican Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009

    Schedule #4BProgram Description: NCLB Title II, Part D, Requirements (cont.)Responses are limited to the space provided, front side only, with a font size no smaller than 9 point (Arial or Verdana)

    Requirement 3: Describe the steps you will take to ensure that all students and teachers in schools served by the LEAinvolved have increased access to educational technology, including how the LEA would use funds (such as combiningthe funds with funds from other sources) to help ensure that(A) students in high-poverty and high-needs schools, orschools identified under Section 1116, have access to technology; and (B) teachers are prepared to integratetechnology effectively into curricula and instruction.

    Except for the Matthey Middle School campus at Southside ISD that will open in August 2009 and will be equipped withnew technology funded by a bond, all other campuses participating in this collaborative have technology equipment thais 5 to 7 years old. Libraries at those same campuses are equipped with the oldest computers, consequently making itdifficult to stream video or display multimedia-rich websites. Currently, most teachers use little or no technology forinstruction and technology is mainly used for productivity or automated tasks.This T3 grant will create equity at all participating campuses by providing the necessary funding to create technology-rich classroom environments. It will also provide the opportunity to build capacity and empower teachers to enhanceMath and Science curricula and teaching practices through meaningful, engaging technology-rich experiences that wounot be possible otherwise.

    Equity will also benefit participating campus libraries by increasing access to quality, multimedia-rich Web resources anproviding opportunities to promote information literacy and collaboration skills. These critical components of 21st

    Century learning are needed not only at the library, but also in the classroom and home. Teachers, librarians andinstructional technologists (when available) will have opportunities to collaborate, rethink the effectiveness of thecurriculum currently used at those campuses, and have an opportunity to enrich it by infusing 21st Century tools,resources, context, pedagogical strategies, and assessments.School leaders will create a vision for technology, understand its value and benefits, refine their technology skills, andset the expectation for the meaningful use of technology in participating classrooms.

    Requirement 4: Describe how you will(A) identify and promote curricula and teaching strategies that integratetechnology effectively into curricula and instruction, based on a review of relevant research, leading to improvements istudent academic achievement, as measured by challenging State academic content and student academic achievemenstandards; and (B) provide ongoing, sustained professional development for applicable teachers, principals,administrators, and school library media personnel serving the local educational agency, to further the effective use of

    technology in the classroom or library media center, including, if applicable, a list of the entities that will be partnerswith the local educational agency involved in providing the ongoing, sustained professional development.

    The effective integration of technology into the curriculum will be accomplished through a professional developmentmodel that is sustained overtime, supported through frequent and ongoing classroom level support, and is focused onthe integration of technology into instruction as opposed to learning about technology. The professional developmentwill follow a design-based approach where teachers have opportunities to learn how to use specific technologies situatein the context of their curricular needs. According to Lawless and Pellegrino (2007) this approach results in teacherstaking more ownership of the resources, higher confidence in integrating the new skills and tools, and a greater belief ithe connection between the skills and student achievement.

    In addition to the design-based approach we will utilize a mentoring/coaching model where ESC-20 InstructionalTechnology Specialists, Library Services & Media Specialist and content specialists will support the effective

    implementation of the newly acquired knowledge and skills which results in a higher level of comfort and a greater leveof proficiency in the use of technology (Lawless & Pellegrino, 2007). The technology training and mentoring/coaching

    support will be provided through a collaborative approach utilizing the talents of the ESC-20 staff as well as the districttechnology staff.

    Support for teachers, librarians and instructional technologists between onsite visits will be maintained through amultitude of communication means, including email, web conferencing, videoconferencing, and virtual communities(i.e., Moodle) that will allow cohorts to share best practices, discuss issues and ideas, and upload technology-richinquiry lessons and activities.

    In addition to technology proficiency, benefits of this approach for participating teachers will include increasedknowledge of content, pedagogical practices, self-confidence, and the creation of a community of learners.

    Page 21 of 88 RFA# 701-09-1Copyright Texas Education Agency. All rights reserved. SAS# A860-

  • 8/14/2019 Part4 Application 6 30

    24/222

    For TEA Use OnlyAdjustments and/or annotations madeon this have been confirmed with

    by telephone/FAX onby of TEA.

    TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCYStandard Application System (SAS)

    School Years 2009-2010 and2010-2011

    015-950County District N

    Amendment

    Target Tech in Texas (T3) Collaborative GrantAmerican Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009

    Schedule #4BProgram Description: NCLB Title II, Part D, Requirements (cont.)

    Responses are limited to the space provided, front side only, with a font size no smaller than 9 point (Arial or Verdana)Requirement 5: Describe the type and costs of technologies to be acquired, including services, software, and digitalcurricula, and including specific provisions for interoperability among components of such technologies.

    Each participating Math and Science 21st Century classroom will be equipped with a teacher laptop, LCD projector,interactive whiteboard, remote response system, a document camera, and 4 student computers. In classrooms wherethere is not enough physical space for student computers, netbook carts will be available for on-demand use. Theestimated cost of the equipment for 56 classrooms (32 Math and 24 Science in grades 5 through 8) is approximately$200,000.

    Additional technology tools to be used in participating Math and Science classrooms include science probes, digitalcameras, digital camcorders, iPods, and audio systems. These items are not currently available at any of those

    campuses. The estimated cost for the above items is $100,000.

    In order to transform libraries at participating campuses into 21st Century libraries, 28 new computers and 7 netbook

    carts will be purchased to supplement or replace existing equipment. The estimated cost for library equipment is$112,000.

    Most classroom equipment and library computers will already be available at Matthey Middle School, Southside ISD andwill be purchased with local funds (bond). Each district will pay the cost of software licenses for all new computers.Digital resources available at all campuses will be either state-funded (K-12 Databases) or purchased by each districtthrough ESC-20 Coop membership with local funds (video streaming, additional online resources).

    Requirement 6: Describe how you will coordinate activities carried out with grant funds with technology-relatedactivities carried out with funds available from other federal, state, and local sources.

    Numerous expenditures in this project will be covered with additional sources of funding with special care not to

    supplant existing services.

    - Southside ISD will purchase all classroom and library equipment at the new Matthey Middle School with local funds

    (bond). These include interactive whiteboards, teacher computers, student computers, projectors, and librarycomputers.- All three districts actively utilize the state-funded K-12 Databases resources.- All three districts will have access to additional digital resources and professional development through ESC-20 coopservices. These resources include video streaming and other quality digital content. Training is geared mainly towardcampus librarians, therefore addressing the library services focus area. Training includes navigation of online resourcesintegration of video streaming across the curricula, 21st Century skills at the library, collaboration strategies, integratinglibrary resources into the curriculum, and more.- Hondo ISD will use local funds to transfer the district curriculum to an online format to provide easy access tocurriculum guides, lesson plans and instructional practices to meet identified TEKS and student expectations.- Title II Part D funds and local funds will be used at all three districts to provide district-wide access to videoconferenc

    equipment and support. This programming is coordinated by ESC-20 and includes virtual field trips, studentcollaborative distance learning projects, and bringing experts into the classroom.- Title I ARRA funds will be used to update libraries at Hondo ISD by increasing the number of workstations andproviding better search capabilities during student research projects.- Intel courses (Essentials and Thinking with Technology) are grant funded (through ESC Region 10) and taught by anESC-20 Instructional Technology specialist, who is also a senior Intel trainer.

    What else?

    Page 22 of 88 RFA# 701-09-1Copyright Texas Education Agency. All rights reserved. SAS# A860-

  • 8/14/2019 Part4 Application 6 30

    25/222

    For TEA Use OnlyAdjustments and/or annotations madeon this have been confirmed with

    by telephone/FAX onby of TEA.

    TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCYStandard Application System (SAS)

    School Years 2009-2010 and2010-2011

    015-950County District N

    Amendment

    Target Tech in Texas (T3) Collaborative GrantAmerican Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009

    Schedule #4BProgram Description: NCLB Title II, Part D, Requirements (cont.)

    Responses are limited to the space provided, front side only, with a font size no smaller than 9 point (Arial or Verdana)Requirement 7: Describe how you will integrate technology (including software and other electronically deliveredlearning materials) into curricula and instruction, and a timeline for such integration.

    Technology tools and resources as well as pedagogical strategies will be introduced gradually in grades 5-8 Math andScience classrooms to ensure teachers will feel prepared to transform their current classrooms into 21st Centuryclassrooms. Time needed to move through each phase will vary depending the teachers current comfort level withtechnology, pedagogical skills and years of teaching experience.

    Once teachers are comfortable with technology foundations such as basic use of the laptop and projector, onlineresources and ethical acquisition of digital information, they will be introduced to the use of interactive whiteboard andwill learn how to create dynamic, interactive lessons that address the needs of all learners.

    As soon as they feel competent using the interactive whiteboard, remote response systems will be introduced, allowingstudents to make predictions, check their understanding and provide immediate feedback. Introducing the use of

    student computers will offer just in time access to online and multimedia resources as needed. Students will thereforebe taught information literacy skills, including searching for information; organizing, analyzing and synthesizinginformation; and ethical use of digital resources. Classroom management in the technology-rich environment will bemodeled at every opportunity.

    The use of traditional as well as Web 2.0 technologies will be introduced to both teachers and students to solveproblems and to communicate. Technologies chosen will be appropriate for each task.

    Requirement 8: Describe how you will encourage the development and utilization of innovative strategies for thedelivery of specialized or rigorous academic courses and curricula through the use of technology, and, if applicable,distance learning technologies, particularly for those areas that would not otherwise have access to such courses andcurricula due to geographical isolation or insufficient resources.

    Technology allows classrooms to extend beyond the four walls of their room or building. Through distance learningtechnologies, teachers and students have multiple opportunities to enrich content and extend the impact of theirlearning to their entire community and beyond.

    Hondo ISD, Sabinal ISD and Southside ISD have access to videoconference technologies and services through ESC-20.Programming includes virtual field trips to zoos, museums, wildlife refuges, science centers, NASA, the Smithsonian,and much more. Sessions scheduled on request will support and extend classroom experiences. Web conferencingtechnologies (i.e., Skype) will be used to interview experts and to interact with partnering classrooms at otherparticipating campuses and across the region.

    Should the Texas Virtual Schools Network offer courses for middle school students in the future, those courses will beconsidered to support the efforts of this T3 Collaborative and to provide additional opportunities for student learning.

    What else?

    Page 23 of 88 RFA# 701-09-1Copyright Texas Education Agency. All rights reserved. SAS# A860-

  • 8/14/2019 Part4 Application 6 30

    26/222

    For TEA Use OnlyAdjustments and/or annotations madeon this have been confirmed with

    by telephone/FAX onby of TEA.

    TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCYStandard Application System (SAS)

    School Years 2009-2010 and2010-2011

    015-950County District N

    Amendment

    Target Tech in Texas (T3) Collaborative GrantAmerican Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009

    Schedule #4BProgram Description: NCLB Title II, Part D, Requirements (cont.)

    Responses are limited to the space provided, front side only, with a font size no smaller than 9 point (Arial or Verdana)Requirement 9: Describe how you will ensure the effective use of technology to promote parental involvement andincrease communication with parents, including a description of how parents will be informed of the technology beingapplied in their childs education so that the parents are able to reinforce at home the instruction their child receives atschool.

    Participation and active involvement of students parents/guardians and effective communication are essential to thesuccess of this program. Since most families in Hondo, Sabinal and Southside ISD live in rural communities and morethan of the children live in families with inco