partnership for assessment of readiness for …...oct 17, 2018 · grade 10 5,542 4 3,170 48 grade...

Measuring

College and

Career

Readiness

PARTNERSHIP FOR ASSESSMENT OF

READINESS FOR COLLEGE AND CAREERS

PARCC RESULTS

YEAR ONE

2015

City of Burlington Public School District

December 14, 2015

Board of Education Public Meeting

“New Jersey will educate all students to

prepare them to lead productive, fulfilling

lives. Through a public education system

that is seamlessly aligned from pre-school

to college, students will gain the requisite

academic knowledge and technical and

critical thinking skills for life and work in

the 21st century.”

VISION FOR PUBLIC EDUCATION IN NEW JERSEY

2

2009: New Jersey adopted h igher course taking requirements for al l s tudents .

2010: New Jersey adopted the Common Core State Standards in Engl ish Language Ar ts and Mathemat ics .

RAISING

STANDARDS College and Career Ready Standards

“Align New Jersey high school standards and graduation requirements to college and workforce entry requirements.” – NJ High School Redesign Steering Committee (HSRSC - 2008)

New Jersey has adopted standards that “are widely recognized as appropriate standards for college and career readiness.” - College and Career Ready Taskforce (CCRT - 2012)

3

In 2015, New Jersey adopted the Partnership for Assessment

of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) to replace HSPA

and previous assessments in the elementary and middle

school in language arts and mathematics.

Students took PARCC English Language Arts and Literacy

Assessments (ELA/L) in grades 3 – 11.

Students took PARCC Mathematics Assessments in grades 3 –

8 and End of Course Assessments in Algebra I, Geometry, and

Algebra II.

NEW JERSEY’S STATEWIDE

ASSESSMENT PROGRAM

4

Level 1: Not yet meeting grade-level expectations

Level 2: Partially meeting grade-level expectations

Level 3: Approaching grade-level expectations

Level 4: Meeting grade-level expectations

Level 5: Exceeding grade-level expectations

PARCC PERFORMANCE LEVELS

5

Not Yet

Meeting

(Level 1)

Partially

Meeting

(Level 2)

Approaching

Expectations

(Level 3)

Meeting

Expectations

(Level 4)

Exceeding

Expectations

(Level 5)

% >=

Level 4

Grade 3 15 18 24 39 5 44

Grade 4 8 15 27 39 12 51

Grade 5 7 15 26 45 6 52

Grade 6 8 16 28 40 9 49

Grade 7 11 15 23 34 18 52

Grade 8 12 15 22 39 13 52

Grade 9 18 19 24 30 10 40

Grade 10 25 18 20 26 11 37

Grade 11 17 19 24 30 11 41

NEW JERSEY’S 2015 PARCC OUTCOMES

ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY

Note: Numbers may not sum to 100% due to rounding.

6

NJ ARK COL DC ILL MD MASS NM OH RI

Grade 3 44 29 38 25 34 54 25 n/a 37

Grade 4 51 34 42 25 37 57 24 37 38

Grade 5 52 32 41 26 37 63 24 37 38

Grade 6 49 33 39 23 33 60 22 36 35

Grade 7 52 35 41 24 37 60 21 40 38

Grade 8 52 32 41 26 38 64 22 40 35

Grade 9 40 36 38 25* 31* 39 27 45 33

Grade 10 37 37 27 25* 31* 40 31 58 31

Grade 11 41 n/a 40 25* 31* 39 45 n/a n/a

* Some states average their HS results together

ELA Scores for PARCC States

Table Shows Percentage Meeting or Exceeding Expectations

Not Yet

Meeting

(Level 1)

Partially

Meeting

(Level 2)

Approaching

Expectations

(Level 3)

Meeting

Expectations

(Level 4)

Exceeding

Expectations

(Level 5)

% >=

Level 4

Grade 3 8 19 28 37 8 45

Grade 4 7 22 30 36 4 41

Grade 5 6 21 32 35 6 41

Grade 6 8 21 30 35 6 41

Grade 7 8 22 33 33 4 37

Grade 8* 22 26 28 23 1 24

Algebra I 14 25 25 33 3 36

Geometry 12 36 30 20 3 22

Algebra II 32% 25 20 22 2 24

NEW JERSEY’S 2015 PARCC OUTCOMES

MATHEMATICS

* Note: Approximately 30,000 New Jersey students participated in the PARCC

Algebra I assessment while in middle school. Thus, PARCC Math 8 outcomes are

not representative of grade 8 performance as a whole. Note: Numbers may not sum to 100% due to rounding.

8

NJ ARK COL DC ILL MD MASS NM OH RI

MATH 3 45 31 37 30 36 55 25 39 36

MATH 4 41 24 30 28 28 47 19 36 27

MATH 5 41 24 30 25 27 55 20 36 27

MATH 6 41 25 32 21 26 53 19 35 26

MATH 7 37 22 27 14 27 45 15 31 25

MATH 8 24 17 19 17 31 53 9 26 12

ALG 1 36 28 30 10 * 17 * 31 17 36 26

GEO 22 21 24 10 * 17 * 36 13 58 14

ALG 2 24 n/a 28 10 * 17 * 20 13 18 n/a n/a

* Some states average their HS results together

MATH Scores for PARCC States

Table Shows Percentage Meeting or Exceeding Expectations

2015 PARCC ELA/L Grade 4 51%

2013 NAEP Reading Grade 4 42%

2015 SAT: 44%

met Col lege

and Career

Ready

Benchmark

2015 ACT: 43%

met Col lege

and Career

Ready

Benchmark .

PARCC

OUTCOMES

IN CONTEXT

2015 PARCC Math Grade 4 41%

2013 NAEP Math Grade 4 49%





2015 PARCC Algebra I 36%

2011 ADP Algebra I 35%

NAEP: National Assessment of Educational Progress https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/

ADP: American Diploma Project http://www.achieve.org/adp-network 10

END-OF-COURSE MATH OUTCOMES,

% MEETING/EXCEEDING EXPECTATIONS

ADP

Algebra I

(2011)

PARCC

Algebra I

(2015)

PARCC

Geometry

(2015)

PARCC

Algebra II

(2015)

Count % Count % Count % Count %

Grade 6 39 79 66 92

Grade 7 3,001 94 3,536 93

Grade 8 29,715 70 27,498 72 2,973 92 459 73

Grade 9 61,177 21 53,656 18 20,279 47 4,720 70

Grade 10 8,969 5 5,542 4 41,930 8 20,710 39

Grade 11 2,182 4 1,398 4 5,895 2 32,092 7

11

ALGEBRA I PARCC OUTCOMES AND

COURSE GRADES

PARCC

Algebra I (2015)

Percent “C” or higher in

Algebra I course AY1415

Count % Meeting or

Exceeding

Count* % >= C

Grade 6 66 92 62 100

Grade 7 3,536 93 3,305 94

Grade 8 27,498 72 24,944 89

Grade 9 53,656 18 44,923 67

Grade 10 5,542 4 3,170 48

Grade 11 1,398 4 623 46

* Based on an overall 84% match rate at a student-level between NJSMART course roster collection and PARCC Algebra I assessment data.

Looking for mismatches between outcomes and expectations is an important first

step, i.e., roughly 18% of freshman met or exceeded expectations in PARCC Algebra I

yet 67% received Cs or better in their course. 12

Count of

Valid Test

Scores

Not Yet

Meeting

(Level 1)

Partially

Meeting

(Level 2)

Approaching

Expectations

(Level 3)

Meeting

Expectations

(Level 4)

Exceeding

Expectation

(Level 5)

District

% >=

Level 4

NJ % >=

Level 4

Grade 3 100 30 23 17 30 0 30 44

Grade 4 94 22 17 27 28 6 34 51

Grade 5 102 11 25 28 35 0 35 52

Grade 6 120 8 25 44 21 3 24 49

Grade 7 95 29 25 26 17 2 19 52

Grade 8 92 29 29 26 13 2 15 52

Grade 9 146 19 27 19 31 3 34 40

Grade 10 129 35 16 26 19 5 24 37

Grade 11 102 20 22 23 27 9 36 41

BURLINGTON CITY’S

2015 PARCC GRADE-LEVEL OUTCOMES

ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY

13

14

PARCC ASSESSMENT 2014-2015

GRADE 3 ELA/L

15


GRADE 4 ELA/L

16


GRADE 5 ELA/L

17


GRADE 6 ELA/L

18


GRADE 7 ELA/L

19


GRADE 8 ELA/L

20


GRADE 9 ELA/L

21


GRADE 10 ELA/L

22


GRADE 11 ELA/L

Burlington City New Jersey

Grade 3 725 743

Grade 4 732 750

Grade 5 735 750

Grade 6 735 747

Grade 7 720 749

Grade 8 719 749

Grade 9 730 738

Grade 10 722 733

Grade 11 736 740

23

2014-2015 PARCC Assessment

English Language Arts Literacy

Average Overall Score

Count of

Valid Test

Scores

Not Yet

Meeting

(Level 1)

Partially

Meeting

(Level 2)

Approaching

Expectations

(Level 3)

Meeting

Expectations

(Level 4)

Exceeding

Expectation

(Level 5)

District

% >=

Level 4

NJ % >=

Level 4

Grade 3 102 17 36 26 20 1 21 45

Grade 4 96 9 38 32 19 2 21 41

Grade 5 104 15 37 33 15 0 15 41

Grade 6 121 10 35 34 19 2 21 41

Grade 7 97 12 35 38 14 0 14 37

Grade 8* 76 39 28 24 9 0 9 24

Algebra I 145 19 37 24 20 0 20 36

Geometry 113 15 51 17 17 0 17 22

Algebra II 101 36 42 17 6 0 6 24

BURLINGTON CITY’S

2015 PARCC GRADE-LEVEL OUTCOMES

MATHEMATICS

24

25


GRADE 3 MATHEMATICS

26


GRADE 4 MATHEMATICS

27


GRADE 5 MATHEMATICS

28


GRADE 6 MATHEMATICS

29


GRADE 7 MATHEMATICS

30


GRADE 8 MATHEMATICS

31


ALGEBRA I

32


GEOMETRY

33


ALGEBRA II

Burlington City New Jersey

Grade 3 725 745

Grade 4 729 743

Grade 5 723 743

Grade 6 730 742

Grade 7 725 739

Grade 8 712 725

Algebra I 722 737

Geometry 720 729

Algebra II 706 721

34

2014-2015 PARCC Assessment

Mathematics

Average Overall Score

GRADE NJASK/HSPA PARCC

GRADE 3 54.2% 44%

GRADE 4 39.8% 51%

GRADE 5 39.8% 51%

GRADE 6 49.5% 49%

GRADE 7 43.2% 52%

GRADE 8 56% 39%

GRADE 11 82.1% 41%

35

2014 NJASK & HSPA PROFICIENT/ADVANCED PROFICIENT

COMPARED TO 2015 PARCC MEETS/EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS

ELA/L

GRADE NJASK/HSPA PARCC

GRADE 3 65.6% 45%

GRADE 4 56.3% 41%

GRADE 5 56.1% 41%

GRADE 6 75.3% 41%

GRADE 7 41.1% 37%

GRADE 8 49.4% 24%

GRADE 11 58.9%

ALGEBRA 1 36%

GEOMETRY 22%

ALGEBRA 2 24% 36

2014 NJASK & HSPA PROFICIENT/ADVANCED PROFICIENT

COMPARED TO 2015 PARCC MEETS/EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS

MATHEMATICS

Mobility Rate

How are entering students transitioned into the school and district?

Who reviews the student file?

Who reviews test scores and report cards?

How is the student’s information communicated to the classroom

teachers?

Chronic Absenteeism

How do we reduce chronic absenteeism?

Graduation Rate

Students need to score at Level 4 or Level 5 to meet future

graduation requirements.

37

FACTORS TO CONSIDER

September

Enrollment Left Entered Attendance Rate

NJ Out of State NJ Out of State

Boudinot 85 8 0 2 0 96.76%

Lawrence 179 6 1 5 2 95.01%

Smith Elementary 155 0 0 4 0 97.85%

Smith Preschool 165 16 0 0 0 94.95%

WWIS 415 3 0 15 0 96.69%

BCHS 713 21 0 36 0 95.20%

6.95% 1712 54 1 62 2

October

Enrollment Left Entered Attendance Rate

NJ Out of State NJ Out of State

Boudinot 86 0 1 1 1 96.14%

Lawrence 178 4 0 1 2 93.70%

Smith Elementary 156 3 0 4 0 96.54%

Smith Preschool 166 4 0 5 0 93.81%

WWIS 417 3 3 7 1 96.50%

BCHS 711 24 1 19 4 93.81%

5.13% 1714 38 5 37 8

38

FACTORS TO CONSIDER

MOBILITY RATE 2015-2016 DATA

2015-2016 Student Mobility

Transferred Out Transferred In Total Percent

September 55 64

October 43 45

November

December

January

February

March

April

May

June

Total 98 109 207 12.08%

39

FACTORS TO CONSIDER

MOBILITY RATE 2015-2016 DATA

City of Burlington Public School District

2015-2016 Chronic Absenteeism and Tardiness to School

September 2015 # Days in

Session # Enroll # Absent 10% Percent of

Students # Late 10% Percent of

Students Minutes of

Instruction/Day Minutes of

Inst. For Month

Boudinot 16 85 12 14.12% 12 14.12% 340 5,440

Lawrence 16 179 23 12.85% 37 20.67% 340 5,440

Smith - Elementary 16 155 12 7.74% 13 8.39% 340 5,440

Smith Preschool 16 165 35 21.21% 18 10.91% 340 5,440

WWIS 16 415 50 12.05% 27 6.51% 375 6,000

BCHS 16 713 116 16.27% 102 14.31% 335 5,360

Total 1,712 248 14.49% 209 12.21%

Count for September is number of students absent 2 or more days and/or tardy 2 or more days.

October 2015 # Days in

Session # Enroll # Absent 10% Percent of

Students # Late 10% Percent of

Students Minutes of

Instruction/Day Minutes of

Inst. For Month

Boudinot 21 86 20 23.26% 21 24.42% 340 7,140

Lawrence 21 178 57 32.02% 63 35.39% 340 7,140

Smith - Elementary 21 156 24 15.38% 26 16.67% 340 7,140

Smith Preschool 21 166 47 28.31% 32 19.28% 340 7,140

WWIS 21 417 69 16.55% 61 14.63% 375 7,875

BCHS 21 711 170 23.91% 160 22.50% 335 7,035

Total 1,714 387 22.58% 363 21.18%

Count for October is number of students absent 2 or more days and/or tardy 2 or more days. 40

FACTORS TO CONSIDER

CHRONIC ABSENTEEISM 2015-2016 DATA

Grade/Subject Boudinot Lawrence Smith # Students Average

Class Size

K5 32 36 42 110 18.3

1 22 55 56 133 19.0

2 33 40 36 109 15.6

WWIS

3 104 17.3

4 95 19.0

5 88 14.7

6 98 16.3

BCHS

7 110

English 7 Double

Periods 18.3

Math 7 Double

Periods 18.3

Science 7 18.3

Geography 7 18.3

8 100

English 8 Double

Periods 16.7

Math 8 Double

Periods 16.7

Science 8 16.7

Social Studies 8 16.7 41

2015-2016 AVERAGE CLASS SIZE

Course Sections # Students Average

Class Size

English 9 8 89 11.1

English 10 8 100 12.5

English 11 9 108 12.0

English 12 8 107 13.4

Algebra 1 6 75 12.5

Geometry 7 109 15.6

Algebra 2 6 97 16.2

Precalculus H 3 27 9.0

Calculus H & AP 1 8 8.0

Statistics H 1 14 14.0

Statistics AP 1 10 10.0

Applied Math 2 16 8.0

Medical Math 1 4 4.0

Environmental Science 7 87 12.4

Biology 10 125 12.5

Chemistry 10 109 10.9

Physics 3 34 11.3

World History 9 98 10.9

US History 1 8 102 12.8

US History 2 7 111 15.9

US History AP 1 13 13.0

Humanities 1 20 20.0

World Affairs 1 15 15.0

Law for HS Students 1 20 20.0

Economics/Personal Finance 3 48 16.0

Note: Does not include self contained special education or resource room classes 42

2015-2016 AVERAGE CLASS SIZE

Year Cohort #

of

students

Students

graduated

Transfer Out-

Unverified

On-Track

Continuing

Off-Track

Continuing

Active

Student

Status

Unknown

Dropout

# % # % # % # % # % # %

2015 144 113 78.5 4 2.8 5 3.5 7 4.9 1 0.7 14 9.7

2014 180 148 82.2 3 1.7 5 2.8 5 2.8 19 10.6

43

FACTORS TO CONSIDER

GRADUATION RATE 2015

District and School Level Data: Math, ELA, reading and writing, and also by grade levels

Disaggregated data, by subgroups

Disaggregated data by categories, (i.e., standards

sub-claims)

Item analysis

Student-level analysis

YEAR ONE DATA ANALYSIS PLAN:

DRILLING DOWN

44

Data analysis

Curriculum review

Action plan to address gaps in curriculum and instruction

Curriculum is what to teach

Instruction is how the curriculum is taught in the classroom

45

NEXT STEPS

46

ACTION PLAN FOR EACH ASSESSED AREA

AND GRADE LEVEL 2015-2016 Student Achievement Action Plan

SCHOOL NAME:

Grade:

Content Area: English Language Arts Mathematics Science

Assessment:

Intervention(s) to be implemented:

Subgroup(s) Targeted for

Intervention:

Black Hispanic White American Indian Asian Two or More Races

Total Population Students with Disabilities Limited English Proficient Students

Economically Disadvantaged

Measurable Goal:

Goal Attainment Indicator:

Action Steps Persons Responsible Due Date - Timeline Progress Report

March 2016

1

2

3

4

5

Add additional forms as needed.

QUESTIONS TO GUIDE PARCC DATA

REFLECTION

How will we use PARCC data to identify strengths and gaps that exist in curriculum and instruction?

How will we use PARCC data to inform the conversations of our educators?

What can we learn about where additional professional resources are needed to meet the learning needs of all students?

47

partnership for assessment of readiness for …...oct 17, 2018 · grade 10 5,542 4 3,170 48 grade...

Documents