patterns in evolution i. phylogenetic ii. morphological iii. historical (later) iv. biogeographical
TRANSCRIPT
Patterns in Evolution
I. Phylogenetic
II. Morphological
III. Historical (later)
IV. Biogeographical
Patterns in Evolution
II. Morphological
A. Patterns1. Homology- similar due to inheritance from immediate ancestor
•similar in relationship of parts •similar in developmental origin •similar in genetic regulation
Patterns in Evolution
II. Morphological
A. Patterns1. Homology- similar due to inheritance from immediate ancestor
2. Homoplasy - (analogies) similar in function
2. Homoplasy - (analogies) similar in function •convergent evolution: composed of different body parts, or in
different arrangement, or different developmental origins (eyes, wings, etc.)
Cacti - Western Hemisphere
Euphorbs - Eastern Hemisphere
2. Homoplasy - (analogies)•convergent evolution: composed of different body parts, or in
different arrangement, or different developmental origins (eyes, wings, etc.)
Ocotillo - Western Hemisphere Allauidia - Eastern Hemisphere
2. Homoplasy - (analogies)•convergent evolution: composed of different body parts, or in
different arrangement, or different developmental origins (eyes, wings, etc.)
2. Homoplasy - (analogies)•convergent evolution: composed of different body parts, or in
different arrangement, or different developmental origins (eyes, wings, etc.)
2. Homoplasy - (analogies)•parallel evolution: similar (but independent) developmental origin
2. Homoplasy - (analogies)•parallel evolution: similar (but independent) developmental origin
2. Homoplasy - (analogies)•Batesian Mimicry: toxic model, non-toxic mimic
toxic models
Female of Papilio dardanus mimicking different species
Male of Papilio dardanus
2. Homoplasy - (analogies)•Batesian Mimicry: dangerous model, vulnerable mimic
2. Homoplasy - (analogies)•Mullerian Mimicry: two toxic species gain an advantage by
looking like one another
2. Homoplasy - (analogies)•reversals - creates similarities between 'ancestral' and a derived
group - often the reversion is due to genetic regulation
2. Homoplasy - (analogies)•reversals - creates similarities between 'ancestral' and a derived
group - often the reversion is due to genetic regulation
2. Homoplasy - (analogies)•reversals - creates similarities between 'ancestral' and a derived
group - often the reversion is due to genetic regulation
Patterns in Evolution
II. Morphological
A. Patterns B. Developmental Trends in Morphological Patterns
2. Individualization
Evolution by duplication - individualization - specialization - reduction
Duplication - Specialization - Reduction.... and individualization at the duplication stage allows for separate evolutionary pressures to act on these replicated parts.
B. Developmental Trends in Morphological Patterns
3. Heterochrony
evolutionary change due to a change in the timing of developmental events...two classic examples are:
Paedomorphosis - either a reduction of development rate, or a shorter absolute development time; either way resulting in the attainment of reproductive adulthood while juvenile characteristics are still present
Axolotl
B. Developmental Trends in Morphological Patterns
3. Heterochrony
evolutionary change due to a change in the timing of developmental events...two classic examples are:
Peramorphosis - delayed maturity; reproduction at a disproportionately large size
Patterns in Evolution
II. Morphological
A. Patterns B. Developmental Trends in Morphological Patterns
4. Allometry
•Differential rates of growth of different body parts. This is a very important mechanism of evolutionary change, because often homologous traits simply differ in the relative size of their parts (bat wing, hand). Often, body size, itself, is used as the standard against which allometric increases in specific body parts are measured... y = bx^a. If a = 1, the body dimensions change at the same rate (no allometry). if a > 1, then y changes faster than x (positive allometry - leg length), and if a < 1, then there is negative allometry. Obviously, allometric differences become more pronounced as the organism increases in size... so large organisms and small often have the most extreme proportions (Irish Elk). •Got another example?
B. Developmental Trends in Morphological Patterns
4. Allometry
Patterns in Evolution
II. Morphological
A. Patterns B. Developmental Trends in Morphological Patterns
5. Results: Evolutionary Trends
Developmental changes can be rather "easy" - these are tweaks to a system. Allometric differences, alone, can occur solely in response to selection for different body sizes. This can produce a very regular and progressive trend in morphology over time, and within a group of closely related organisms. This can occur in an Adaptive Radiation - and these changes in morphology, though slight, may have dramatic changes in the ecology of the organism and may result in niche partitioning among many similar species - like Darwin's Finches, and the Cichlid fishes of lakes in Africa (Malawi, Victoria, Tanganyika). Variant trait can be used for a new purpose…
Patterns in Evolution
I. Phylogenetic
II. Morphological
III. Historical (later)
IV. Biogeographical
Patterns in Evolution
IV. Biogeographical
A. Darwin's Points•1. The similarity and dissimilarity of faunas can't be completely explained by correlations with environment. For instance, although the faunas of the pampas and Australian grasslands are convergent in response to the similar environment, they are composed of radically different organisms - placentals vs. marsupials.
Patterns in Evolution
IV. Biogeographical
A. Darwin's Points•2. Barriers to migration are critical to maintaining these different communities.
Patterns in Evolution
IV. Biogeographical
A. Darwin's Points•2. Barriers to migration are critical to maintaining these different communities. (Pliocene = 5-1.75 mya) - Great Faunal Exchange
Patterns in Evolution
IV. Biogeographical
A. Darwin's Points•3. Species on a continent are more closely related than those from different continents, on average. Wallace's biogeographical realms
Patterns in Evolution
IV. Biogeographical
A. Darwin's Points
B. Alfred Russel Wallace. 1855. On the law that has regulated the introduction of new species. Annals and Magazine of Natural History.
1. Large groups, such as classes and orders, are generally spread over the whole earth, while smaller ones, such as families and genera, are frequently confined to one portion, often to a very limited district.
Class: Aves
Family: Trochilidae (Hummingbirds)
Archilochus spp.
Selasphorus spp.
B. Mechanisms
1. Dispersal: both range expansion over contiguous habitat, and 'jump' dispersal across a barrier, or a 'stepping stone' model across an archipelago
B. Mechanisms
2. Vicariance: a range is divided by separation of the habitat - tectonic plate separation, new river, etc.
A B C
C. Patterns
1. Vicariance: phylogeny correlates with the division of land masses (or other geographic or historical patterns)
LAND PHYLOGENY
C. Patterns
1. Vicariance: monophyletic groups correlate with the division of land masses (or other geographic or historical patterns)
Nelsen and Platnick, 1981
C. Patterns
1. Vicariance: monophyletic groups correlate with the division of land masses (or other geographic or historical patterns)
Nelsen and Platnick, 1981
Vicariance doesn't explain all patterns, but it accounts for the basic pattern.
C. Patterns
2. Dispersal: Actually, you can't really falsify dispersal... because some particular dispersal sequence could fit a phylogeny. So, you need to falsify vicariance... and then assume dispersal.
C. Patterns
2. Dispersal: Actually, you can't really falsify dispersal... because some particular dispersal sequence could fit a phylogeny. So, you need to falsify vicariance... and then assume dispersal.
BUT... dispersal can also correlate with geographical history... in volcanic archipelagoes that "produce" new islands over hotspots... phylogenies that correlate with island age imply dispersal and speciation:
Island Age
Phylogeny
C. Patterns
2. Dispersal: Actually, you can't really falsify dispersal... because some particular dispersal sequence could fit a phylogeny. So, you need to falsify vicariance... and then assume dispersal.
BUT... dispersal can also correlate with geographical history... in volcanic archipelagoes that "produce" new islands over hotspots... phylogenies that correlate with island age imply dispersal and speciation.
ALSO... unbalanced communities are suggestive of dispersal; the differential dispersal ability of different organisms creates "unbalanced" communities.
1. Marine Archipelagoes lack frogs and large mammals.
2. Islands forms are often giant or dwarf species.