patton & gandhi - the redemption of wes : devops enterprise 2014

77
WARNING! If you believe in certainty and control, you may find this session uncomfortable.

Upload: stephen-fishman

Post on 05-Dec-2014

208 views

Category:

Presentations & Public Speaking


2 download

DESCRIPTION

This presentation was shared at DevOps Enterprise 2014 and is meant to help leaders understand how to develop influence and drive change in consensus based organiztions

TRANSCRIPT

WARNING! If you believe in certainty and

control, you may find this session uncomfortable.

Gandhi & Patton “The Redemption of Wes”

Prologue:

Professional History

A Little Bit About Autotrader

What We Have Accomplished

In the last 3 1/2 years, the team that I work with has:

• Created a relationship with bi-directional accountability with our business partners

• Broke all HR metrics for employee satisfaction in one of the largest teams in the company

• Retired 2 legacy API platforms and built a new state of the art RESTful services platform that drives several billion dollars in revenue and powers all of our mobile products

• Started a journey of full QA and network automation

• Swapped out our: • search engine • ad platform • ESB • services gateway • web application stack • CRM platform • mobile application stack • intranet platform • BI tagging solution

• Captured the high ground on • DevOps • Automation • Speed/Quality/MTTR

I know exactly how you feel.

SXSW 2012 - When IT says no

Do you work in a consensus driven

enterprise?

Do you find yourself frustrated by the pace of

change?

Which of these sound familiar?

Automation costs too much and it won’t

work anyway.

We’ve tried that before and it failed.

Why should the business pay for that?

We want humans to make those changes.

We make too many mistakes now. Why do you want to speed up?

That sounds like a ‘you’ problem.

How do you respond?

Have you heard the one about the guy who would rather have a hole in his

organization?

Where’s Wes?

Here’s Wes - You can tell by the wild

gestures and flying fingers

Where’s Wes?

HBR’s simple wisdom from 2005

HBR’s simple wisdom from 2005

results regardless of

form

form regardless of

results

i.e., Results are insufficient if a

reasonable amount of form is not present

In order to not slow adoption down, you must transcend the “jerk paradox”

In order to not slow adoption down, you must transcend the “jerk paradox”

followed

Easier said than done

But not impossible if you understand trust and

conversational dynamics

Creating change in a consensus organization is like riding a bike

When riding up hill, form is the more critical success factor

When riding downhill, unwavering commitment to results is the critical success factor

These two contexts and leadership orientations can be mapped to two different leadership modes

Uphill - Gentle pressure persistently applied

Downhill - Maniacal pressure relentlessly applied

Trust dynamics help you to understand which one

to apply

Circle of Gandhi

Circle of Patton

People who implicitly trust

you regardless of appearances

People who implicitly

distrust you regardless of

appearances

The critical factor to account for, is the degree of trust placed in you by the audiences you are attempting to inspire

What was Patton’s mistake here?

Patton acted in a manner that others, in absence of knowing Patton, would

jump to the wrong conclusion

If full knowledge of Patton’s character were known by all witnesses, what would have been

different?

What did Gandhi do right here?

Gandhi demonstrated his commitment to his ideals

by being willing to sacrifice the relationship that he valued the most...

AND HE APOLOGIZED

If full knowledge of Gandhi’s character were

not known by all witnesses, what would have been different?

Let’s break it down

In the circle of Patton:

Raise the bar higher (unless you are dancing

the limbo)

Never be ashamed to ask for excellence

Aim for this zone

Of course it’s hard to automate everything. What’s your

point? I thought we were a group of badasses who relished challenges. Was I

wrong?

We must automate everything, including the concept of

automation! Build me a robot capable of building other robots! And do it

yesterday!

We can automate almost everything! It’s just a matter of time and persistence.

Who’s with me?

Religiously strive for collegiality

Aim for this zone

If you have a better idea, let’s hear it. This isn’t a shop of HIPPOs and LIPPOs.

What happens over time

In the circle of Gandhi:

Step 0: Assume positive intent

Step 0: Assume positive intent

Thanks for leaning into change and making

this happen!

Step 0: Assume positive intent

Thanks for staying positive. I know it’s hard not

to get frustrated.

Step 0: Assume positive intent

Please borrow my copy of The Speed of Trust

Step 0: Assume positive intent

Maybe you are right, but it still would be better for you to

have figured out a way to resolve this at your level

I know exactly how you feel.

Step 1: Empathize

Step 2: Point to higher ground

Step 3: Wait

Step 4: Repeat

What happens over time

Circle of Gandhi

Circle of Patton

Circle of Gandhi

Circle of Patton

and…

Pitfalls to watch out for

Being branded as “the lovable fool” (i.e., you are all about form and can’t execute)

Being branded as “the lovable fool” (i.e., you are all about form and can’t execute)

Circle of Gandhi

Circle of Patton

The attitudes of the newly converted are highly volatile

Solution: Don’t stay static. Seek Balance

Aim for this zone

Of course it’s hard to automate everything. What’s your

point? I thought we were a group of badasses who relished challenges. Was I

wrong?

We must automate everything, including the concept of

automation! Build me a robot capable of building other robots! And do it

yesterday!

We can automate almost everything! It’s just a matter of time and persistence.

Who’s with me?

Allowing frustration to creep in when being told “no”

Press inward too hard

“Yes” is the destination. “No” is how you get there.

Press inward too hard

Pressing inward too hard results in unforeseen costs

Aim High Celebrate Small Wins

Retreat, to the territory of the

lovable fool

1 2 3

Epilogue

Why I’m Here

I’m a product of my environment (i’m a redeemed Wes) • My education, relationships & experience have combined

together to allow me to form the perspective that I shared today; Hopefully you’ll find it valuable.

• The daily activities that help me achieve the self mastery necessary to make this approach work are:

• Writing & journaling • Teaching others • Making a habit of ruthless introspection • Play-testing & role-play (come try this out with me to see for yourself) • Having children • Being married to an award winning artist • Working for a Marine • Surrounding myself with people who care about me and seeking out

meaningful feedback • Treating all feedback as a contribution • Making it a priority to demonstrate visible incorporation of the feedback

provided to me

Three Things I Need Help With

Taking automation to the next level • Automating tag validation, building out a canary

infrastructure, data-centric services validation, automated performance and load tests, decreasing automation cycle times, etc.!

Finding DevOps, Automation & Performance talent in Atlanta • I’m on the lookout for awesome engineers and architects

!Feedback on today’s presentation

• How can I make this idea more relevant and meaningful to people who work in enterprises of all sizes

1

2

3

Questions?

[email protected] @trivoca

If you need help, feel free to hit me up