paul sommers penn state brookhaven, january 29, 2008 astroparticle physics
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Paul Sommers Penn State Brookhaven, January 29, 2008 Astroparticle Physics](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032708/56649e625503460f94b5deaa/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Paul Sommers
Penn State
Brookhaven, January 29, 2008
Astroparticle Physics
![Page 2: Paul Sommers Penn State Brookhaven, January 29, 2008 Astroparticle Physics](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032708/56649e625503460f94b5deaa/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
![Page 3: Paul Sommers Penn State Brookhaven, January 29, 2008 Astroparticle Physics](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032708/56649e625503460f94b5deaa/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Equal Exposure Plot
Arrival Directions for E>3 EeV
+25 deg
0 deg
-30 deg
-60 deg RA = 0 deg
![Page 4: Paul Sommers Penn State Brookhaven, January 29, 2008 Astroparticle Physics](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032708/56649e625503460f94b5deaa/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Arrival directions of the 27 highest energy events
![Page 5: Paul Sommers Penn State Brookhaven, January 29, 2008 Astroparticle Physics](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032708/56649e625503460f94b5deaa/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Veron-Cetty AGNs (red dots)
Supergalactic Plane (blue line)
Swift x-ray galactic black holes (blue circles)
![Page 6: Paul Sommers Penn State Brookhaven, January 29, 2008 Astroparticle Physics](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032708/56649e625503460f94b5deaa/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Mollweide Projection
With AGN marks shaded by exposure
![Page 7: Paul Sommers Penn State Brookhaven, January 29, 2008 Astroparticle Physics](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032708/56649e625503460f94b5deaa/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Full-Sky Aitoff Projection
(Observatory exposure shaded)
![Page 8: Paul Sommers Penn State Brookhaven, January 29, 2008 Astroparticle Physics](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032708/56649e625503460f94b5deaa/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
The exploratory discovery of the AGN correlation
Harari et al., May, 2006
3-parameter search scan: minimum energy, circular window radius, maximum redshift for sources.
![Page 9: Paul Sommers Penn State Brookhaven, January 29, 2008 Astroparticle Physics](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032708/56649e625503460f94b5deaa/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
The GZK energy threshold
For anisotropy is where the spectrum
Is falling rapidly
![Page 10: Paul Sommers Penn State Brookhaven, January 29, 2008 Astroparticle Physics](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032708/56649e625503460f94b5deaa/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
GZK Horizon
Definition: The distance for which 90% of the cosmic rays above an energy cut should be produced within a volume around us with that distance as radius.
Depends on the fraction (90% horizon in this example)
Depends on the energy cut
Depends on the source energy spectrum (steepness and maximum energy)
Normally assumes homogeneous source distribution
The steeply falling source spectrum makes for a short horizon distance above the threshold for GZK energy loss. (Particles must start with higher energy at larger distances to arrive above the detection energy cut, but the sources do not produce many particles above those higher energies.)
![Page 11: Paul Sommers Penn State Brookhaven, January 29, 2008 Astroparticle Physics](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032708/56649e625503460f94b5deaa/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
![Page 12: Paul Sommers Penn State Brookhaven, January 29, 2008 Astroparticle Physics](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032708/56649e625503460f94b5deaa/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Firm Conclusions
Cosmic rays do not arrive isotropically.
The arrival pattern proves that sources are extragalactic.
The GZK effect is confirmed. [Spectral steepening is not due simply to “sources running out of steam.” We see structure for D<75 Mpc without confusion from more distant sources.]
Extragalactic B-fields are weak enough that they do not mask the structure.
Galactic halo B-fields are weak enough that they do not mask the structure.
Tentative Conclusions
Discrete sources out to ~75 Mpc are being detected.
Charged particle astronomy will be possible with very large exposure.
Halo B-fields are weak. (Point sources smeared less than 3.2 degrees.)
Intergalactic B-fields are interestingly weak.
The highest energy cosmic rays are protons.
Cosmic ray acceleration occurs where supermassive black holes are accreting matter.
![Page 13: Paul Sommers Penn State Brookhaven, January 29, 2008 Astroparticle Physics](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032708/56649e625503460f94b5deaa/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Outline
AGN correlation
Observatory description
Hadronic interactions in air showers
Energy spectrum
Photon limits
Neutrino limits
In development:
HEAT
AMIGA
Radio detectors
Auger North
![Page 14: Paul Sommers Penn State Brookhaven, January 29, 2008 Astroparticle Physics](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032708/56649e625503460f94b5deaa/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Three 8” PM Tubes
Plastic tank
White light diffusing liner
De-ionized water
Solar panel and electronic box
Commantenna
GPSantenna
Battery box
Auger Water Cherenkov Detector
![Page 15: Paul Sommers Penn State Brookhaven, January 29, 2008 Astroparticle Physics](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032708/56649e625503460f94b5deaa/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
![Page 16: Paul Sommers Penn State Brookhaven, January 29, 2008 Astroparticle Physics](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032708/56649e625503460f94b5deaa/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
![Page 17: Paul Sommers Penn State Brookhaven, January 29, 2008 Astroparticle Physics](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032708/56649e625503460f94b5deaa/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
![Page 18: Paul Sommers Penn State Brookhaven, January 29, 2008 Astroparticle Physics](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032708/56649e625503460f94b5deaa/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
![Page 19: Paul Sommers Penn State Brookhaven, January 29, 2008 Astroparticle Physics](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032708/56649e625503460f94b5deaa/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
![Page 20: Paul Sommers Penn State Brookhaven, January 29, 2008 Astroparticle Physics](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032708/56649e625503460f94b5deaa/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
The Auger Collaboration
Argentina
Australia
Bolivia
Brazil
Czech Republic
France
Germany
Italy
Mexico
Netherlands
Poland
Portugal
Slovenia
Spain
United Kingdom
United States
Vietnam
Jim Cronin
Alan Watson
![Page 21: Paul Sommers Penn State Brookhaven, January 29, 2008 Astroparticle Physics](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032708/56649e625503460f94b5deaa/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Jan 28, 2008
![Page 22: Paul Sommers Penn State Brookhaven, January 29, 2008 Astroparticle Physics](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032708/56649e625503460f94b5deaa/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Air showers develop faster than expected for protons at high energies.
![Page 23: Paul Sommers Penn State Brookhaven, January 29, 2008 Astroparticle Physics](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032708/56649e625503460f94b5deaa/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Universality: The electromagnetic signal depends only on energy and the grammage distance of shower maximum from the ground. Muon lateral distribution and attenuation with slant depth have little dependence on primary particle or interaction assumptions. (Only the normalization is sensitive to those.)
By studying the dependence of signal on zenith angle at fixed energy (fixed intensity), the muonic contribution can be separated (on average) from the electromagnetic part.
The electromagnetic signal tells the energy. This method gives systematically higher energies than the air fluorescence measurements. (Roughly 25%) The inferred muon content is higher than expected even for iron showers.
![Page 24: Paul Sommers Penn State Brookhaven, January 29, 2008 Astroparticle Physics](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032708/56649e625503460f94b5deaa/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Auger Energy Spectrum
![Page 25: Paul Sommers Penn State Brookhaven, January 29, 2008 Astroparticle Physics](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032708/56649e625503460f94b5deaa/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Spectrum with multiplicative factor
![Page 26: Paul Sommers Penn State Brookhaven, January 29, 2008 Astroparticle Physics](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032708/56649e625503460f94b5deaa/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Gamma rays develop deeper in the atmosphere
![Page 27: Paul Sommers Penn State Brookhaven, January 29, 2008 Astroparticle Physics](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032708/56649e625503460f94b5deaa/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
16% upper limit
derived using measure depths of maximum in hybrid mode.
![Page 28: Paul Sommers Penn State Brookhaven, January 29, 2008 Astroparticle Physics](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032708/56649e625503460f94b5deaa/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Signal risetime and shower front curvature are different for gamma ray
showers
![Page 29: Paul Sommers Penn State Brookhaven, January 29, 2008 Astroparticle Physics](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032708/56649e625503460f94b5deaa/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
2% upper limit at
10 EeV using surface detector shower measurements
![Page 30: Paul Sommers Penn State Brookhaven, January 29, 2008 Astroparticle Physics](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032708/56649e625503460f94b5deaa/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Earth Skimming
Auger exposure to tau Neutrinos
zenith angle ~ 90-92o
Pierre Auger Pierre Auger NeutrinoNeutrino Observatory Observatory
![Page 31: Paul Sommers Penn State Brookhaven, January 29, 2008 Astroparticle Physics](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032708/56649e625503460f94b5deaa/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
![Page 32: Paul Sommers Penn State Brookhaven, January 29, 2008 Astroparticle Physics](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032708/56649e625503460f94b5deaa/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Outline
AGN correlation
Observatory description
Hadronic interactions in air showers
Energy spectrum
Photon limits
Neutrino limits
In development:
HEAT
AMIGA
Radio detectors
Auger North
![Page 33: Paul Sommers Penn State Brookhaven, January 29, 2008 Astroparticle Physics](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032708/56649e625503460f94b5deaa/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
5-year Auger Full-Sky Simulation
( E > 1019 eV and < 60o )
36000 arrival directions
Relative exposure as function of
sin(declination)
Auger North + Auger South
![Page 34: Paul Sommers Penn State Brookhaven, January 29, 2008 Astroparticle Physics](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032708/56649e625503460f94b5deaa/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Exposures in AGASA units
1 AGASA = 1630 km2·sr·yr
Auger South
Auger North
South + North
![Page 35: Paul Sommers Penn State Brookhaven, January 29, 2008 Astroparticle Physics](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032708/56649e625503460f94b5deaa/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
The Auger North site is a 3-hour drive from Denver International Airport.
Major city is Lamar, pop. 10,000
1300 meters above sea-level.
Flat topography.
Semi-arid or dry climate.84 miles
48 miles
84 by 48 miles is one concept, 4000 square miles
![Page 36: Paul Sommers Penn State Brookhaven, January 29, 2008 Astroparticle Physics](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032708/56649e625503460f94b5deaa/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Summary
There is anisotropy correlating with extragalactic structure
GZK effect confirmed independent of source spectrum assumptions
Intergalactic magnetic fields are not strong
Charged particle astronomy is coming. We need Auger North!
Some reasons to suppose energies are underestimated (~25% ?)
The apparent GZK horizon is more appropriate at 80 EeV than 60 EeV
AIRFLY measurements suggest lower fluorescence yield
Surface measurements (with universality arguments) suggest it
Hints of interesting hadronic interactions at high energies
Proton “beam”
Xmax values stop rising with energy
Muon richness is greater than predicted by extrapolations
![Page 37: Paul Sommers Penn State Brookhaven, January 29, 2008 Astroparticle Physics](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032708/56649e625503460f94b5deaa/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Thank you!
Visit www.auger.org
for other information:
Scientific and technical papers
Event displays (1% of the data)
Google Earth and Google Sky stuff
[Thanks to Stephane Coutu for those]