paul stein [email protected] usccb...

31
A TOOLKIT FOR COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT PAUL STEIN [email protected] USCCB WEBINAR JUNE 2016

Upload: phamkhue

Post on 20-Apr-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • A TOOLKIT FOR COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT

    PAUL [email protected]

    USCCB WEBINARJUNE 2016

    mailto:[email protected]

  • CONTENT REVIEW

    Community engagement tools and processes

    Final toolkit only as good as your input and your use

    You will have homework

  • Immigrant integration is a dynamic, two-way process in which newcomers and the receiving society work together to build secure, vibrant, and cohesive communities. As an intentional effort, integration engages and transforms all community members, reaping shared benefits and creating a new whole that is greater than the sum of its parts.

    Grantmakers Concerned with Immigrants and Refugees2006 Immigrant Integration Toolkit (six domains identified)

    ARRIVING COMMUNITIES

    RECEIVING COMMUNITIES

    WHAT IS INTEGRATION?

  • KEY DEFINITIONS

    Welcoming Community: an inclusive place in which all people, including immigrants, have the opportunity to reach their greatest potential, engage with their community, and fully contribute their talents expanding prosperity and well-being for all. (Source: Welcoming America)

    Arriving Communities: the newcomer residents of communities (including the institutions and organizations focused on assisting newcomer residents)

    Receiving Communities: the long-time residents of the communities where immigrants settle (including the institutions and organizations focused on assisting long-time residents)

  • REFUGEE INTEGRATION SURVEY AND EVALUATION(RISE)

    Funded by the Office of Refugee Resettlement

    Coordinated by the Colorado Refugee Services Program

    Designed and implemented by, and all data from, Quality Evaluation Designs

    Available at Colorado Refugee Services Program: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-9dBwl5XFYdTjVnUy1DWXgxZDA/view

    Cite as: Lichtenstein, G., Puma, J., Engelman, A., Miller, M. (2016). The Refugee Survey & Evaluation (RISE) Study, Year 5: Final ReportA Study of Refugee Integration in Colorado.Unpublished technical report (pp. 1-126). Bluff, Utah, USA: Quality Evaluation Designs. Available at: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-9dBwl5XFYdTjVnUy1DWXgxZDA/view

    https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-9dBwl5XFYdTjVnUy1DWXgxZDA/viewhttps://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-9dBwl5XFYdTjVnUy1DWXgxZDA/view

  • CAVEATS FOR USING RISE DATA

    NOT a program or performance evaluation (NOT about the Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration, or the Office of Refugee Resettlement, or States, or Resettlement Agencies)

    NOT a judgement about the character and capacities of individual refugees, but rather a series of measured snapshots of very individual and asymmetrical experiences

    Suggests that increasing and accelerating integration scores will be good for refugees, and will be viewed as a positive accomplishment by a great majority of individuals

    Suggests an extension or application of the RISE data, or possible assumptions for new logic models and project designs, but does not state a direct finding from the RISE data

    Suggests a possible increase or decrease in the amounts of an intervention, but does not state the better or worse type of program to deliver that intervention

  • RISE Survey: Framing and Scoring

    10 Integration Pathways Assessed1. Employment and Economic Sufficiency 6. Social Bonding2. Education and Training 7. Social Bridging3. Childrens Education 8. Language and Cultural Knowledge4. Health and Physical Well-Being 9. Safety and Stability5. Housing 10. Civic Engagement

    44 core items provide pathway-level scores that can be summed into an

    Overall Integration Score

  • RISE Survey: Cohort Integration Progress from Baseline to B+3

    63%

    32%

    20%

    5%

    29%

    17%23%

    19%

    8%

    51%57%

    76%

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    Baseline B+1 B+2 B+3

    Low Medium High

    Low integration steadily decreases each year, while high integration increases.

  • RISE Survey: Overall Median Integration Score

    Low Integration = 0-16 Medium Integration = 17-24 High Integration = 25-44

    14.6

    22.4

    24.8

    30.2

    8.0

    16.0

    24.0

    32.0

    40.0

    Baseline B+1 B+2 B+3

    Medium Integration

    Low Integration

    High Integration

    There is a shift each year across the cohort from low to high integration.

  • Employment and Economic Sufficiency1. Are you currently employed?

    Baseline B+1 B+2 B+3

    17.0 54.2 62.8 63.5

    Application:While steadily improving, employment must be balanced in the context that refugee resettlement is a protection program and not an economic

    migration program. As a benchmark, employment must be understood in the context of other integration variables.

  • Health and Physical Well-Being36. Do you know how to make an appointment to see a doctor?

    Baseline B+1 B+2 B+3

    32.4 55.3 51.6 63.8

    Application:The low level of agency for healthcare access supports the need for

    community navigators, and a very focused welcoming initiative. There is an opportunity to focus future research on the connection between self-

    efficacy and integration, as beliefs about ones ability to impact health influence whether actions will be taken.

  • Language and Cultural Knowledge54. Do you speak English in most social and work situations?

    Baseline B+1 B+2 B+3

    6.3 35.9 43.1 50.9

    Application:The high correlation between social bridging and language acquisition

    supports an increased focus on welcoming initiatives and career latticing opportunities that include language training, perhaps more than on

    separate post-placement ESL classes.

  • Social Bridging48. Do you spend time interacting with people of a culture, ethnic group, language, or religion different than your own?

    Baseline B+1 B+2 B+3

    48.0 60.0 54.8 64.6

    Application:The highest correlation (r=.76) between any two domains is between

    social bridging and language and cultural knowledge. Durable welcoming initiatives and community engagements might significantly contribute to

    increased integration in this domain, and to overall integration.

  • APPLICATION OF RISE TO COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT

    FRAMEWORK: The RISE framework of ten pathways accurately reflects the experiences of refugees along a continuum of integration.

    Community engagement by arriving communities should use all of these integration pathways for more nuanced strategic planning, and should pay close attention to how the receiving community frames its engagement in all of these pathways.

    DATA: The RISE survey is a psychometrically sound instrument that yields an Overall Integration score and pathway scores, and identifies patterns of high, medium, and low integration experiences, leading to more efficient targeting of resources.

    Community engagement should evolve over time, and should have diverse approaches and stakeholders, in order to reflect changes in integration scores.

    CORRELATIONS: The RISE analysis demonstrates strong correlations (score accelerators) between certain integration pathways.

    Community engagement should explore the potential for leveraging resources and relationships by working across pathways and through collective impact strategies.

  • OFFICE OF REFUGEE RESETTLEMENTWELCOMING COMMUNITIES

    Supporting the work of Welcoming America that

    connects leaders in community, government, and nonprofit sectors, by providing support both locally and nationally

    builds on the great work happening in local communities, by providing tested methods and approaches to creating inclusive, welcoming places for immigrants

    changes systems and cultures, by helping communities create policy, reinforce welcoming principles, and communicate the socioeconomic benefits of inclusion

  • WELCOMING AMERICA PARADIGM

    The Welcoming America approach to

    Connect + Build + Change

    moves communities from

    Fearful Tolerant Welcoming

    Community Engagement = Better TogetherCross-sector collaboratives show great promise for coordinating, expanding, and scaling refugee integration in communities. Welcoming America

  • WELCOMING CITIES PLANS AND COLLABORATIVES

    Atlanta, GAAurora, CO

    Baltimore, MDBoise, ID

    Charlotte, NCChicago, IL

    Cleveland, OHDayton, OHDecatur, GADetroit, MI

    High Point, NCNashville, TNPittsburgh, PASt. Louis, MO

  • IDENTIFY and INFORM INVITE and INVOLVE INVEST and IMPACT

    ARRI

    VIN

    G

    COM

    MU

    NIT

    IES

    Learning Communities: Partnering Communities: Integrating Communities:

    RECE

    IVIN

    G

    COM

    MU

    NIT

    IES Awakening Cities: Engaging Cities: Enterprising Cities:

    CONTINUUM OF COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT:Goals and stakeholders evolve over time

  • IDENTIFY and INFORM INVITE and INVOLVE INVEST and IMPACTAR

    RIVI

    NG

    CO

    MM

    UN

    ITIE

    SLearning Communities: Partnering Communities: Integrating Communities:

    Refugee resettlement agencies develop a role as the gateway to coordinate learning events that explore the demographics and needs of new refugee placements, and the capacities of mainstream partners to meet those needs.

    RECE

    IVIN

    G

    COM

    MU

    NIT

    IES

    Awakening Cities: Engaging Cities: Enterprising Cities:Cities develop whole of government and whole of city strategic commitments and development,based on collective impact projects designed to improve the ability of cities to attract and deploy socially motivated investment capital at scale and for the benefit of all populationsin need, including refugees but not focused on refugees.

    CONTINUUM OF COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT

  • IDENTIFY and INFORMAR

    RIVI

    NG

    CO

    MM

    UN

    ITIE

    S

    Learning Communities: Refugee resettlement agencies develop a role as the gateway to

    coordinate learning events that explore the demographics and needs of new refugee placements, and the capacities of mainstream partners to meet those needs.

    Communications are based on refugees as groups, and on addressing a checklist of community touch points, meeting topics and talking points, mostly using input data and grant requirements, and without taking advocacy positions.

  • IDENTIFY and INFORMRE

    CEIV

    ING

    CO

    MM

    UN

    ITIE

    S

    Awakening Cities: Cities develop multiple and overlapping municipal points of contact,

    with receptivity to learning but little continuity or shared buy in fromthose who have ad hoc assignments to interact with refugee resettlement agencies.

    Communications are based on an incomplete knowledge and citation of demographics and arrival process for refugees in the community, seeing little difference between groups and few assets within individuals, and outreach materials are primarily in English.

  • INVITE and INVOLVEAR

    RIVI

    NG

    CO

    MM

    UN

    ITIE

    S

    Partnering Communities: Refugee resettlement agencies develop an ability to partner and

    design for refugee services based on a quantifiable matrix for individual refugee progress that distinguishes multiple pathways (employment, ELL, health, etc.) and multiple statuses (at risk, stable, thriving), with segmented partners including mainstream agencies and individual refugees.

    Organizational adaptation is supported to create FTEs to coordinate and attend meetings, and to read into mainstream materials.

  • INVITE and INVOLVERE

    CEIV

    ING

    CO

    MM

    UN

    ITIE

    S

    Engaging Cities: Cities develop a no wrong door approach to disseminating and

    receiving information, or planning and implementing services, which takes a more holistic approach to individual needs and strengths.

    Organizational adaptation is supported to create an ombudsman or commission inclusive of refugees to raise awareness about refugees and include their concerns in planning initiatives.

  • INVEST and IMPACTAR

    RIVI

    NG

    CO

    MM

    UN

    ITIE

    S

    Integrating Communities: Refugee resettlement agencies develop the expertise for their staff

    and individual refugee leaders to include refugees as a population of interest in broader mainstream community planning utilizing frameworks different than refugee resettlement or integration (such as health equity, neighborhood stabilization, economic development, community wealth building).

    Data is maintained that aligns with external metrics for success, and mostly based on outcomes and impacts.

  • INVEST and IMPACTRE

    CEIV

    ING

    CO

    MM

    UN

    ITIE

    S

    Enterprising Cities: Cities develop whole of government and whole of city strategic

    commitments and development, based on collective impact projects designed to improve the ability of cities to attract and deploy socially motivated investment capital at scale and for the benefit of all populations in need, including refugees but not focused on refugees.

    Data is maintained with separate tracking and analysis for refugees (where possible/permissible), and expertise in presenting about refugees.

  • THE CONTINUUM OF COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT matrix is a useful tool

    to help answer such strategic questions as:

    WHERE ARE WE?

    WHO IS WITH US OR NEEDED?

    WHERE CAN WE GO OR WANT TO GO?

    HOW WILL WE GET THERE?

  • Learning Communities

    Partnering Communities

    Integrating Communities

    Employment and Economic SufficiencyEducation and TrainingChildren's EducationHealth and Physical Well-BeingHousingSocial BondingSocial BridgingLanguage and Cultural KnowledgeSafety and StabilityCivic Engagement

    AR

    RIV

    ING

    CO

    MM

    UN

    ITIE

    S

    REFERENCING THE TRAITS ON THE COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT MATRIX, INDICATE YOUR ORGANIZATIONAL STATUS RELATIVE TO EACH INTEGRATION PATHWAY

    EXERCISE 1: MAPPING

    Sheet1

    EXERCISE 2: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT AND INTEGRATION SELF-ASSESSMENT

    Learning CommunitiesPartnering CommunitiesIntegrating Communities

    ARRIVING COMMUNITIESEmployment and Economic Sufficiency

    Education and Training

    Children's Education

    Health and Physical Well-Being

    Housing

    Social Bonding

    Social Bridging

    Language and Cultural Knowledge

    Safety and Stability

    Civic Engagement

    Awakening CitiesEngaging CitiesEnterprising Cities

    RECEIVING COMMUNITIESEmployment and Economic Sufficiency

    Education and Training

    Children's Education

    Health and Physical Well-Being

    Housing

    Social Bonding

    Social Bridging

    Language and Cultural Knowledge

    Safety and Stability

    Civic Engagement

    Sheet2

    REFERENCING THE TRAITS ON THE COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT MATRIX, INDICATE YOUR ORGANIZATIONAL STATUS RELATIVE TO EACH INTEGRATION PATHWAYLearning CommunitiesPartnering CommunitiesIntegrating Communities

    ARRIVING COMMUNITIESEmployment and Economic Sufficiency

    Education and Training

    Children's Education

    Health and Physical Well-Being

    Housing

    Social Bonding

    Social Bridging

    Language and Cultural Knowledge

    Safety and Stability

    Civic Engagement

    Sheet3

    REFERENCING THE TRAITS ON THE COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT MATRIX, INDICATE YOUR ORGANIZATIONAL STATUS RELATIVE TO EACH INTEGRATION PATHWAYAwakening CitiesEngaging CitiesEnterprising Cities

    RECEIVING COMMUNITIESEmployment and Economic Sufficiency

    Education and Training

    Children's Education

    Health and Physical Well-Being

    Housing

    Social Bonding

    Social Bridging

    Language and Cultural Knowledge

    Safety and Stability

    Civic Engagement

  • Awakening Cities

    Engaging Cities

    Enterprising Cities

    Employment and Economic SufficiencyEducation and TrainingChildren's EducationHealth and Physical Well-BeingHousingSocial BondingSocial BridgingLanguage and Cultural KnowledgeSafety and StabilityCivic Engagement

    RE

    CE

    IVIN

    G C

    OM

    MU

    NIT

    IES

    REFERENCING THE TRAITS ON THE COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT MATRIX, INDICATE YOUR ORGANIZATIONAL STATUS RELATIVE TO EACH INTEGRATION PATHWAY

    EXERCISE 1: MAPPING

    Sheet1

    EXERCISE 2: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT AND INTEGRATION SELF-ASSESSMENT

    Learning CommunitiesPartnering CommunitiesIntegrating Communities

    ARRIVING COMMUNITIESEmployment and Economic Sufficiency

    Education and Training

    Children's Education

    Health and Physical Well-Being

    Housing

    Social Bonding

    Social Bridging

    Language and Cultural Knowledge

    Safety and Stability

    Civic Engagement

    Awakening CitiesEngaging CitiesEnterprising Cities

    RECEIVING COMMUNITIESEmployment and Economic Sufficiency

    Education and Training

    Children's Education

    Health and Physical Well-Being

    Housing

    Social Bonding

    Social Bridging

    Language and Cultural Knowledge

    Safety and Stability

    Civic Engagement

    Sheet2

    REFERENCING THE TRAITS ON THE COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT MATRIX, INDICATE YOUR ORGANIZATIONAL STATUS RELATIVE TO EACH INTEGRATION PATHWAYLearning CommunitiesPartnering CommunitiesIntegrating Communities

    ARRIVING COMMUNITIESEmployment and Economic Sufficiency

    Education and Training

    Children's Education

    Health and Physical Well-Being

    Housing

    Social Bonding

    Social Bridging

    Language and Cultural Knowledge

    Safety and Stability

    Civic Engagement

    Sheet3

    REFERENCING THE TRAITS ON THE COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT MATRIX, INDICATE YOUR ORGANIZATIONAL STATUS RELATIVE TO EACH INTEGRATION PATHWAYAwakening CitiesEngaging CitiesEnterprising Cities

    RECEIVING COMMUNITIESEmployment and Economic Sufficiency

    Education and Training

    Children's Education

    Health and Physical Well-Being

    Housing

    Social Bonding

    Social Bridging

    Language and Cultural Knowledge

    Safety and Stability

    Civic Engagement

  • WEAKNESSES

    THREATS

    STRENGTHS

    OPPORTUNITIES

    POLITICAL ECONOMIC SOCIAL TECHNOLIGICAL

    INTERNAL

    EXTERNAL

    EXERCISE 2: SWOT AND PEST ANALYSIS TO BUILD COLLABORATIVES

  • Tampa Bay Garden: Growing a Connected Community

    Cache Refugee & Immigrant Connection Fills the Gaps in Utah

    Nebraska Quilting Project Shares Stories, Cultural Diversity

    Dayton Public Schools' Mentoring Program Helps Refugee Students

    Fit In and Succeed

    Greensboro, NC, Facilitates Cultural Exchanges

    Twin Cities' Gardens of Eden Program Cultivates Community

    PROMISING PRACTICES: Landing Page TemplateHOMEWORK: Send Examples

    http://www.welcomingrefugees.org/portfolio/tampa-bay-garden-growing-connected-communityhttp://www.welcomingrefugees.org/portfolio/tampa-bay-garden-growing-connected-communityhttp://www.welcomingrefugees.org/portfolio/cache-refugee-immigrant-connection-fills-gaps-utahhttp://www.welcomingrefugees.org/portfolio/nebraska-quilting-project-shares-stories-cultural-diversityhttp://www.welcomingrefugees.org/portfolio/dayton-public-schools-mentoring-program-helps-refugee-students-fit-and-succeedhttp://www.welcomingrefugees.org/portfolio/greensboro-nc-facilitates-cultural-exchangeshttp://www.welcomingrefugees.org/portfolio/twin-cities-gardens-eden-program-cultivates-community

  • PAUL [email protected]

    mailto:[email protected]

    Slide Number 1Slide Number 2Slide Number 3Slide Number 4Slide Number 5Slide Number 6RISE Survey: Framing and ScoringRISE Survey: Cohort Integration Progress from Baseline to B+3RISE Survey: Overall Median Integration ScoreEmployment and Economic SufficiencyHealth and Physical Well-BeingLanguage and Cultural KnowledgeSocial BridgingSlide Number 14Slide Number 15Slide Number 16Slide Number 17Slide Number 18Slide Number 19Slide Number 20Slide Number 21Slide Number 22Slide Number 23Slide Number 24Slide Number 25Slide Number 26Slide Number 27Slide Number 28Slide Number 29Slide Number 30Slide Number 31