pc1 edible oil final

8/3/2019 PC1 Edible Oil Final

1/37

1

P.C.1

1. Name of the ProjectIndicate name of the project.

Enhancement of Edible Oil through Sowing

of Canola in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.

2. Location Provide name of District/Province. Swabi, Mardan, Buner, Lakki

Marwat,DIKhan, Tank, Bannu, Karak and

Haripur Districts of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.

Attach a map of the area, clearlyindicating the projects location.

Map Attached.

3. Authorities responsible for:i. Sponsoring. Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa,

Agriculture Livestock & Cooperation

Department.

ii. Execution. Agriculture (Extension) Department KhyberPakhtunkhwa.

iii. Operation and Maintenance. District Officers Agriculture of the ProjectDistrict(s) of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.

iv. Concerned Federal Ministry. Not applicable.4. (a) Plan Provision.

If the project is included in themedium term/five year plan, specify

actual allocation.

The project is reflected in the ADP 2011-12

with an allocation of Rs. 9.000 million and

project cost as Rs. 20.000 million.

If not included in the current plan, whatwarrants its inclusion and how is it now

proposed to be accommodated.

Not Applicable.

If the project is proposed to be financedout of block provision, indicate:

Total Block ProvisionAmount Already

Committed.

Amount proposed for

this project.Balance available.

N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.


2/37

2

(b) Provision in the current PSDP/ADP. The project is included in theADP 2011-12 at

serial No. 580-110123 with an allocation of

Rs. 9.000 million.

5. Project objectives. The objectives of the sector/sub sector

as indicated in the medium term/five

year plan be reproduced. Indicate

objectives of the project and develop

a linkage between the proposed

project and sectoral objectives.

The need for agricultural and rural information

and advisory services is likely to intensify in the

foreseeable future. In most of the world,

agriculture faces the challenge of keeping pace

with rapidly increasing population with few

reserves of potentially cultivable land. Farmers

will have to become more efficient and

specialized.

The main goal of agriculture extension is

dissemination of better agriculture practices

through a number of effective methods whichdivert the farming community from indigenous

practices to the improved/developed modern

techniques. Demonstration is the main tool to

fetch the goals.

Specific objectives of the project are laying out of

canola demonstration plots in the farmers field tomotivate the community in adoption of oil seed

production reducing import bill spending on

edible oil imports.

To cut the import bill on edible oil and to

maintain equilibrium between demand & supply,

it is essential to motivate the farming community

for accommodating edible oil crops in their

cropping pattern.

Specific objectives of the project are:

S.No. Item Unit 2011-12 2012-13 Total

i. Swabi 85 100 185

ii. Mardan 85 100 185iii. Buner 80 120 200

iv. Lakki Marwat 85 120 205

v. DIKhan 90 120 210

vi. Tank 85 120 205

vii. Bannu 90 100 190

viii. Karak 90 100 190

ix. Haripur 90 100 190

780 980 1760

1 Laying out of Canola D/Plots in:

Acres

Total :

S.No. Item Unit 2011-12 2012-

13


i. Swabi Acres 120 130


3/37

3

ii. Mardan 120 130 250

iii. Buner 135 140 275


v. DIKhan 135 140 275

vi. Tank 122 132 254vii. Bannu 122 132 254

viii. Karak 122 132 254

ix. Haripur 122 132 254

Total

:

1133 1208 2341


4/37

4

In case of revised Projects, indicateobjectives of the project, if different

from original P.C.1.

Not applicable.

6. Description and justification ofproject.

Describe the project and indicateexisting facilities in the area and

justify the establishment of the

Project.

Pakistan is a net importer of oil seeds and

edible oils. Domestic production of edible

oils is sufficient to meet only 25% of the total

demand. Domestic oil seed production

includes cotton seed, sunflower seed and

rapeseed. During 2010 the harvested oil seed

production was 4.7 million metric tonnes.

The domestic production of edible oils is

critically insufficient to meet the demand of

growing population. The deficiency of 75%

in the demand of edible oil is met out from

import which increases our import bill by

billions of dollars. There is an intensive need

to increase domestic product of edible oil so

the import bill may be cut to short.

To get the rid of this problem, department

envisaged to promote canola crop cultivation

in the province.

Major oilseed crops are classified into two

groups namely traditional and no traditional.

Cotton, rapeseed/mustard, groundnut and

sesame include in traditional oil seeds while

sunflower and canola are included in non-

traditional oilseeds. Rapeseed/mustard,

sunflower and canola are important oilseed

crops after cottonseed, which contribute

approximately 7%, 32% and 10% in the total

domestic edible oil production, respectively.

Existing Facilities

Technical staff is available at each District

with mobility to access the target group of the

project.

Provide technical parameters i.e. inputand output of the project in quantitative

terms. Also discuss the technology

aspects of the project.

With the help of this project an area of

about 1785 Acres will be brought under

canola crop. The demonstration plots

would be laid out in the farmers field.The project will provide the beneficiary

with a pale of seed, chemical fertilizer

and pesticides for the spray.


5/37

5

From this area farmers will fetch 890.56

metric ton of canola produce (445.28

tonnes/annum).

Per Acre Input Requirements and their Cost.

Unit Qty Unit Cost Amount

Seed Kgs 2 Rs. 160 320

DAP bag 1.5 Rs. 4,000 6,000

Urea bag 2 Rs. 1,500 3,000

Spray Nos. 2 Rs. 600 1,200

Toal : 10,520

Seed Requirements

Area in

Acr.

Seed

Rate/Acr

(in Kgs)

Required Qty

of Seed (in

Kgs.)

Area in

Acr.

Seed

Rate/Acr

(in Kgs)

Required

Qty of Seed

(in Kgs.)

1 Swabi 85 170 100 200 370

2 Mardan 85 170 100 200 370

3 Buner 80 160 120 240 400

4 Lakki Marwat 85 170 120 240 410

5 DIKhan 90 180 120 240 420

6 Tank 85 170 120 240 410

7 Bannu 90 180 100 200 380

8 Karak 90 180 100 200 380

9 Haripur 90 180 100 200 380

Total : 780 1560 980 1960 3520

S.No.2011-12 Total

Required

Qty. in

Kgs.

2012-13

2 2

District Seed Requirements/Input (in Kgs)

Fertilizer Requirements

DAP Urea DAP Urea DAP Urea Total1 Swabi 127.5 170.0 150.0 200.0 277.5 370.0 647.5

2 Mardan 127.5 170.0 150.0 200.0 277.5 370.0 647.5

3 Buner 120.0 160.0 180.0 240.0 300.0 400.0 700.0

4 Lakki Marwat 127.5 170.0 180.0 240.0 307.5 410.0 717.5

5 DIKhan 135.0 180.0 180.0 240.0 315.0 420.0 735.0

6 Tank 127.5 170.0 180.0 240.0 307.5 410.0 717.5

7 Bannu 135.0 180.0 150.0 200.0 285.0 380.0 665.0

8 Karak 135.0 180.0 150.0 200.0 285.0 380.0 665.0

9 Haripur 135.0 180.0 150.0 200.0 285.0 380.0 665.0

Total : 1,170.0 1,560.0 1,470.0 1,960.0 2,640.0 3,520.0 6,160.0

S.No. District Fertilizer Requirements (in bags)

2011-12 2012-13 Total


6/37

6

Output of the Project:

The project will fetch increased oil seed crops production from the demonstration plots

to be laid out in the farmers fields. The quantitative output of the project in term of

produce is estimated as:

2011-12 2012-13 Total

Swabi 43.01 50.60 93.61

Mardan 43.01 50.60 93.61

Buner 40.48 60.72 101.20

Lakki Marwat 43.01 60.72 103.73

DIKhan 45.54 60.72 106.26

Tank 43.01 60.72 103.73

Bannu 45.54 50.60 96.14

Karak 45.54 50.60 96.14

Haripur 45.54 50.60 96.14

Total : 394.68 495.88 890.56

District Expected Produce (@ 506 kgs/ha.) in M.Tonnes

2011-12 2012-13 Total

Swabi 6881.60 8096.00 14977.60

Mardan 6881.60 8096.00 14977.60

Buner 6476.80 9715.20 16192.00

Lakki Marwat 6881.60 9715.20 16596.80

DIKhan 7286.40 9715.20 17001.60

Tank 6881.60 9715.20 16596.80

Bannu 7286.40 8096.00 15382.40

Karak 7286.40 8096.00 15382.40

Haripur 7286.40 8096.00 15382.40

Total : 63148.80 79340.80 142489.60

District Oil extraction from 40% of the product (in litters)

From the above quoted produce canola oil would be extracted at a ratio of 40% of the produce

so the farming community will fetch 71244.80 litters canola oil per annum which would fetch

an income of Rs. 8.550 million per annum at an average. Besides that canola cakes to be

obtained would also be used as by product to the domestic animals as fattening factor which

resultantly increase meat/beef ratio by 10~15% .

Provide details of civil works,equipment, machinery and other

physical facilities required for the

project.

Physical facilities to be required for the

project have already been mentioned above.

The seed, fertilizers and pesticides would be

procured for further distribution amongst the

beneficiaries. The beneficiaries are required

to provide the project with usage of

agriculture implements required for sowing

and harvesting of the crop; implements to be

used for plant protection measures.


7/37

7

The plots would be allotted under a

mechanism to be devised in convenience of

the farming community and service providers.

For the purpose, beneficiary will have to

provide with an under taking (specimen at the

end of the paper), that he will abide by theadvices / guidelines extended by the

agriculture department / experts from time to

time. He will have to utilize the quantity of

the produce proposed / recommended by

agriculture department by him while rest of

the produce (if any) will be disposed off

through sale to oil seed development board or

agriculture development fund (what the case

may be).

Indicate governance issues of the sectorrelevant to the project and strategy to

resolve them.

The farming community / beneficiaries

should have to be bound for disposal of the

produce as per instructions of the

agriculture department (extension wing).

The farmer at itself doesnt act accordingly

the instructions and feel himself at liberty to

handle the produce at his will. The fruit of

the project, in this way does not appear to

be projected before the rest of the

community. So to solve the problem, it is

proposed that before allotment of a plot, the

beneficiary would have to provide thedepartment with an undertaking that he will

abide by the guidelines issued by the

department from time to time and would be

bound to dispose his produce off under the

instruction of the department.

Agriculture Production:

For fisheries projects: Give area forfishing and the legal rights to that area;

the availability of trawlers; amountand type of fish likely to be available.

Not applicable.

For Forestry projects: Indicate natureand state of existing forests their

growth rate and any problems

connected therewith. Give details of

species; rotation and anticipated

rotation and volume yield. Indicate

availability of complementary

services, e.g. access roads, saw millsetc.

Not applicable.


8/37

8

For Agriculture Production Projects:Give present and future crop yield,

cropping intensity; land use pattern

technological intervention and the

basis for calculation of the futureoutput.

According to Economic Survey of Pakistan

2010-11, during 2009-10 canola crop was

grown over an area of about 233000 acres

with production of 131000 tonnes seed.

Present situation is not encouraging one.The manifesto of project is to enhance

edible oil area and production. With the

help of this project 1760 acre area will be

brought under canola cultivation which

would fetch 890.56 tonnes of its produce. If

10% of the produce is utilized as canola

seed for further cultivation, it will bring

44528 acres more area under canola.

For all agriculture production sectorprojects, provide

(i) Transport, equipment and fieldmachinery available with the

department.

Road worthy vehicle are available with the

District Officers of Agriculture in the project

District. Besides that Agriculture Officers and

Field Assistant have motorbikes for visit and

supervision of the project activities.

(ii) Effect on farm income andbasis for pricing of outputs.

From the produce canola oil would be

extracted at a ratio of 40% of the produce so

the farming community of Khyber

Pakhtunkhwa will fetch 71244.80 litters

canola oil per annum which would fetch an

income of Rs. 11.399 million per annum at

an average. Besides that canola cakes to be

obtained would also be used as by product

to the domestic animals as fattening factor

which resultantly increase meat/beef ratio

by 10~15%.

(iii) Farm gate and internationalprices.

The project will bring an area of about 1760

Acres under canola crop. The expectedyield per acre is estimated as 890.550

tonnes during 2 years i.e. project period. If

it is sold @ Rs. 160/- p.killogram or Rs.

0.160 million per tones the farmer will fetch

Rs. 142.490 million of Rupees from its

produce.


9/37

9

Agriculture Extension;

Provide history of extension work inand around project area an justify the

extension work.

Agriculture Extension system is an out of

school education system. It has its mandate

viz improving living standard of farmingcommunity through increase in farm income

by perceiving potential output with an

acceptable quality on sustainable basis.

Agriculture Extension department have

following functions to attend.

1. Dissemination of recommendedagricultural practices.

2. Educate/Train farmers in improvedagricultural production technology.

3. Production and distribution ofquality seed and fruit plants.

4. Advisory services in insect/pestmanagement & horticultural

activities.

5. Organize farmers for collectivesolution of agricultural problems.

6. Quality control and regulatorymeasures of Agricultural inputs.

7. Establish & Develop MarketInformation System (MIS) &

Establishment of Regulated Markets

in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.

8. Execution of various cropsIntroduction & Promotion

Programme.

For adoption of modern agriculture

techniques farming community should have

motivated to shift from indigenous methods

to modern track. For the purpose meetingswith the community are arranged, lectures

are delivered but the most effective tool is

laying out of demonstration plots, holding

of field days, arranging workshops and

seminars, exposure visits, experience

sharing workshops etc.

In the history of agriculture extension, there

is a long queue of progress. The efforts

made by Agriculture Extension Work Force

lead the nation towards prosperity and self


10/37

10

sufficiency in food grains despite the global

challenges of food insecurity.

Provide transport, equipment and fieldmachinery etc available with the

department.

The Department has had provided its

Agriculture Officers/Field Assistants with

motorbikes on ownership. The cost of these

bikes are recovered in easy installmentswithout any extra charges. So projects

provide them with POL / maintenance of

their vehicle and they use this transport for

official touring, field visits, execution and

operational activities of the development

projects.

As far as matter of equipments is

concerned, most of the Model Farm

Services Centers have agriculture

equipments to provide it to its registeredmembers as well as un registered farming

community of that respective district. These

farm equipments are provided on nominal

rental. The cost charged is used for

maintenance of those equipments.

Anyhow, arrangements of equipments and

farm machinery is sole responsibility of the

beneficiary either he own or get on rental.

Industry, Commerce and Minerals:

Provide installed capacity, proposedexpansion and available technologies,

the selected technology and reason for

its selection.

Not Applicable.

Whether the output is meant for:(i) Import substitution. Not applicable.(ii) Meeting domestic demand or Not applicable(iii) Export oriented. Not applicable.

In case of export, give likely marketsand their size, competitive prices and

cost of production to justify the project.

Not applicable.

Provide all information under with andwithout project conditions in case of

BMR and expansion projects.

Not applicable.


11/37

11

7. Capital Cost Estimates. Indicate date of estimation of project

cost estimate.

August, 2011.

Basis of determining the capital cost beprovided. It includes market survey,

schedule rates, estimation on the basis

of previous work done etc.

Market prevailing rates.

Provide year-wise estimation ofphysical activities:

Year wise / component wise physical activities

S.No. Item Unit 2011-12 2012-13 Total

i. Swabi 85 100 185

ii. Mardan 85 100 185

iii. Buner 80 120 200


v. DIKhan 90 120 210

vi. Tank 85 120 205vii. Bannu 90 100 190

viii. Karak 90 100 190

ix. Haripur 90 100 190

780 980 1760


Acres

Total :

Phasing of capital cost be worked out on the basis of each item of work as statedabove and provide as per following:

2011-12 2012-13

A03805 Travelling Allow Rs. 0.450 Rs. 0.628 Rs. 1.078

A03827 POL Charges Rs. 0.344 Rs. 0.586 Rs. 0.930

Inputs for D/Plots

Cost of Seed 0.250Rs. 0.361Rs. 0.610Rs.

Cost of Fetilizer

i. DAP 4.680Rs. 5.382Rs. 10.062Rs.

ii. Urea 2.340Rs. 2.691Rs. 5.031Rs.

Cost of spray 0.936Rs. 1.352Rs. 2.288Rs.G.Total of the Scheme 9.000Rs. 11.000Rs. 20.000Rs.

Code No. Classification Cost (in Mill Rs.) Total

A09370


12/37

12

In case of revised projects,provide:

Project is new one.

Project approved history alongwith PSDP allocations, releases

and expenditure.

Not applicable.

Item-wise, year-wise actualexpenditure and Physical

Progress.

Not applicable.

Justification for revision of PC-1and variation in scope of project

if applicable.

Not applicable.

Item-wise comparison of revisedcost with the approved cost and

give reason for variation.

Not applicable.

Exchange rate used to work outFEC in the original and revised

P.C.1s.

Not applicable

8. Annual Operational Cost. Item-wise annual operating cost

based on proposed capacity

utilization for 5 years.

A. Five years summary of the Operational Cost2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18

A03805 Travelling Allow Rs. 0.544 Rs. 0.626 Rs. 0.720 Rs. 0.828 Rs. 0.952 Rs. 3.669

A03827 POL Charges Rs. 0.432 Rs. 0.497 Rs. 0.571 Rs. 0.657 Rs. 0.755 Rs. 2.912

Inputs for D/Plots

Cost of Seed Rs. 0.304 Rs. 0.349 Rs. 0.402 Rs. 0.462 Rs. 0.531 Rs. 2.048

Cost of Fetilizer

i. DAP Rs. 5.487 Rs. 6.310 Rs. 7.257 Rs. 8.345 Rs. 9.597 Rs. 36.997

ii. Urea Rs. 2.744 Rs. 3.155 Rs. 3.628 Rs. 4.173 Rs. 4.799 Rs. 18.499

Cost of spray Rs. 1.139 Rs. 1.310 Rs. 1.506 Rs. 1.732 Rs. 1.992 Rs. 7.679

G.Total of the Scheme 10.650Rs. Rs. 12.247 Rs. 14.084 Rs. 16.197 Rs. 18.626 Rs. 71.804

Code No. Classification Cost (in Mill Rs.) Total

A09370


13/37

13

B. Component Wise Cost.i. Seed Cost:

2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18

1 Swabi 0.040 0.047 0.054 0.062 0.071 0.087

2 Mardan 0.040 0.047 0.054 0.062 0.071 0.087

3 Buner 0.049 0.056 0.064 0.074 0.085 0.104

4 Lakki Marwat 0.049 0.056 0.064 0.074 0.085 0.104

5 DIKhan 0.049 0.056 0.064 0.074 0.085 0.104

6 Tank 0.049 0.056 0.064 0.074 0.085 0.104

7 Bannu 0.040 0.047 0.054 0.062 0.071 0.087

8 Karak 0.040 0.047 0.054 0.062 0.071 0.087

9 Haripur 0.040 0.047 0.054 0.062 0.071 0.087

Total Input Cost: 0.397 0.456 0.525 0.603 0.694 0.853

S.No. District Seed Cost (Rs. In Million) Total Seed

ii. Fertilizer Cost

a. DAP Cost

2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18

1 Swabi 0.443 0.509 0.586 0.673 0.774 0.952

2 Mardan 0.443 0.509 0.586 0.673 0.774 0.952

3 Buner 0.531 0.611 0.703 0.808 0.929 1.142

4 Lakki Marwat 0.531 0.611 0.703 0.808 0.929 1.142

5 DIKhan 0.531 0.611 0.703 0.808 0.929 1.142

6 Tank 0.531 0.611 0.703 0.808 0.929 1.142

7 Bannu 0.443 0.509 0.586 0.673 0.774 0.952

8 Karak 0.443 0.509 0.586 0.673 0.774 0.952

9 Haripur 0.443 0.509 0.586 0.673 0.774 0.952

Total Input Cost: 4.339 4.990 5.738 6.599 7.589 9.329

S.No. District D.A.P. Cost (Rs.in million) Total DAP Cost

b. Urea Cost

2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18

1 Swabi 0.164 0.189 0.217 0.250 0.288 0.354

2 Mardan 0.164 0.189 0.217 0.250 0.288 0.3543 Buner 0.197 0.227 0.261 0.300 0.345 0.424

4 Lakki Marwat 0.197 0.227 0.261 0.300 0.345 0.424

5 DIKhan 0.197 0.227 0.261 0.300 0.345 0.424

6 Tank 0.197 0.227 0.261 0.300 0.345 0.424

7 Bannu 0.164 0.189 0.217 0.250 0.288 0.354

8 Karak 0.164 0.189 0.217 0.250 0.288 0.354

9 Haripur 0.164 0.189 0.217 0.250 0.288 0.354

Total Input Cost: 1.612 1.853 2.131 2.451 2.819 3.465

S.No. District Urea Cost Total Urea Cost


14/37

14

iii. Cost of Spray

2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18

1 Swabi 0.304 0.349 0.402 0.462 0.531 0.653

2 Mardan 0.304 0.349 0.402 0.462 0.531 0.653

3 Buner 0.364 0.419 0.482 0.554 0.637 0.783

4 Lakki Marwat 0.364 0.419 0.482 0.554 0.637 0.783

5 DIKhan 0.364 0.419 0.482 0.554 0.637 0.783

6 Tank 0.364 0.419 0.482 0.554 0.637 0.783

7 Bannu 0.304 0.349 0.402 0.462 0.531 0.653

8 Karak 0.304 0.349 0.402 0.462 0.531 0.653

9 Haripur 0.304 0.349 0.402 0.462 0.531 0.653

Total Input Cost: 2.975 3.422 3.935 4.525 5.204 6.397

S.No. District Spray Cost (Rs. In Million) Total Spray

Cost

C. Total Input Cost

2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18

1 Swabi 0.951 1.094 1.258 1.447 1.664 2.045

2 Mardan 0.951 1.094 1.258 1.447 1.664 2.045

3 Buner 1.142 1.313 1.510 1.736 1.997 2.454

4 Lakki Marwat 1.142 1.313 1.510 1.736 1.997 2.454

5 DIKhan 1.142 1.313 1.510 1.736 1.997 2.454

6 Tank 1.142 1.313 1.510 1.736 1.997 2.454

7 Bannu 0.951 1.094 1.258 1.447 1.664 2.045

8 Karak 0.951 1.094 1.258 1.447 1.664 2.045

9 Haripur 0.951 1.094 1.258 1.447 1.664 2.045

Total Input Cost: 9.323 10.721 12.329 14.178 16.305 20.043

S.No. District Total Inputs Cost (Rs.in Million) Total Input Cost

9. Demand and supply analysis (forIndustrial and Agricultural

Production Projects).

Description of product /services.

The farming community i.e. target group of the

project will be provided with inputs like seed,

fertilizers and pesticides for laying out of

demonstration plots in to their fields. They should

abide by the instructions /directivescommunicated to them by the Agriculture Field

Staff from time to time. The Agriculture staff

namely District Director Agriculture of the

concerned district will visit the field/plot from

time to time. The plots would be laid out under

the instructions and direct supervision of

concerned Agriculture Officer who would be

assisted by his Agriculture Inspector and Field

Assistant. The Agriculture Inspector or Field

Assistant of concerned circle would frequently

pay visit to the demonstration plot and would be

intact with farmers from sowing to harvest.


15/37

15

Demand/Supply along withunit price for the last five

years.

Pakistans vegetable oil imports are forecast at arecord 2.16 million metric tons (MMT) in Marketing

Year (MY) 2011/12, five percent higher than theestimated 2.05 MMT imported in the 2010/11.

Nearly 75 percent of Pakistans domestic

consumption of vegetable oil is met through imports,

81 percent of which is comprised of palm oil. MY2011/12 imports of soybean meal are projected at a

record 400,000 tons, largely sourced from India.Production of oilseeds in 2011/12 is forecast at a

record 5.8 MMT, up 24 percent from the estimated

4.7 MMT harvested in 2010/11. Pakistans

sunflower area in MY 2010/11 increased by over 65

percent over the previous year and production is

estimated at 660,000 tons. Imports of oilseeds are

forecast at a record 1.3 MMT (92 percent rape seed

and 8 percent sunflower seed).

As far as requirements of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa are

concerned, presently the population of the province

is estimated as 25697000 during 2011 (Khyber

Pakhtunkhwa Development Statistics 2010); per

capita consumption of edible oil is 28 Kg/Lit per

one/annum; thus total requirements of edible oilscomes to 719516 metric tons. Per Liter Unit

price/consumer price is Rs. 190.00 at present.

In 2008 per unit cost was Rs. 136/Lit.

Production, Supply and Demand Data Statistics:TotalOilseed

2009/2010 2010/2011 2011/2012Pakistan

MarketYearBegin:Oct MarketYearBegin:Oct MarketYearBegin:Oct

2009 2010 2011

USDAOfficial NewPost USDAOfficial NewPost USDAOfficial NewPost

AreaPlanted

AreaHarvested 3,722 3,432 3,622 3,332 0 4,092

BeginningStocks 67 28 285 40 0 30

Production 5,097 5,097 4,789 4,682 0 5,792

MYImports 1,078 1,005 910 1,180 0 1,300

MYImp.fromU.S. 2 0 2 0 0 0

MYImp.fromEU 18 0 15 0 0 0

TotalSupply 6,242 5,822 6,012 5,902 0 7,122

MYExports 0 0 0 0 0 0

MYExp.toEU 0 0 0 0 0 0

Crush 5,227 5,070 5,230 5,120 0 6,130FoodUseDom.Cons. 0 2 0 2 0 2

FeedWasteDom.Cons. 730 710 628 750 0 940

TotalDom.Cons. 5,957 5,782 5,858 5,872 0 7,072

EndingStocks 285 40 154 30 0 50

TotalDistribution 6,242 5,822 6,012 5,902 0 7,122

CYImports 980 0 810 0 0 00

CYImp.fromU.S. 2 0 2 0 0 0

CYExports 0 0 0 0 0 0

CYExp.toU.S. 0 2 0 0 0 0

TS=TD 0 0 0 0 0 0

Source: Pakistan Oil Seeds and Products 2011.


16/37

16

Imports/Exports for the last fiveyears along with unit price (if

applicable).

Pakistan is among one of the worlds largest

importers of vegetable oil. In Market Year

2011/12, palm oil imports are forecast at a

record 2.1 MMT, up 5 percent from last

years estimate of 2.0 MMT. Refined palm

oil accounts for about 81 percent ofPakistans total edible oil imports. The

United States exports only limited quantities

of soybean oil to Pakistan in the form of

food aid.

Project demand/supply for 10 years.

Settled FATA Toal

1998 17736 3176 20912 585545

2008 23640 4400 28040 785123

2009 24307 4494 28801 806439

2010 24993 4591 29584 828344

2011 25679 4689 30368 850307

2012 26384 4790 31173 872856

2013 27108 4892 32000 896007

2014 27852 4997 32849 919776

2015 28617 5104 33721 9441802016 29402 5214 34616 969235

2017 30209 5325 35534 994960

2018 31038 5439 36478 1021373

2019 31890 5556 37446 1048491

2020 32765 5675 38440 1076333

2021 33665 5797 39461 1104920

YearPopulation '000" Per Capita Consumption

of edible oil (in kgs)Requirements(in M.Tonnes)

28

As already mentioned the local produce (on country level) fulfills

only 25% of the total requirements, while rest is recouped through

import of edible oils. The project is aimed at to motivate the farmingcommunity to adopt the crop and include it in their cropping pattern.

It would help to bring a gradual increase in the area under crop by

5~10% per annum.


17/37

17

Proposed year-wise production and unit price of the product.From the project following production is estimated to be

derived to the farmers through laying out of demonstration

plots in their field.

1st year 2nd year Total

Swabi 43.01 56.00 99.01

Mardan 43.01 56.00 99.01

Buner 40.48 67.20 107.68

Lakki Marwat 43.01 67.20 110.21

DIKhan 45.54 67.20 112.74

Tank 43.01 67.20 110.21

Bannu 45.54 56.00 101.54Karak 45.54 56.00 101.54

Haripur 45.54 56.00 101.54

Total : 394.68 548.80 943.48

District Expected Produce (@ 506 kgs/acres.) in M.Tonnes

Existing and proposed arrangements for marketing.The produce of these demonstration plots to be laid out in

the farmers field will be disposed off in consultation with

Department of Agriculture Extension. The Extension staff

will help the farmer in marketing of the produce.

10.Financial PlanSource of Financing: Provincial ADP 2011-12.

(a)Equity: Sponsors own resources -- Federal government Provincial government DFIs/banks General Public Foreign Equity (indicate

partner Agency.

NGOs/Beneficiaries Others

--

Rs.20.000 Million (ADP 2011-12)--

--

--

--

--

--

--


18/37

18

(b)DebtIndicate the local & foreign debt,

interest rate, and grace period andrepayment period for each loan

separately. The loan repayment

schedule be also annexed.

Not applicable.

(c)Grants along with source. Provincial ADP(d)Weighted cost of capital --

11.Benefits of the project and analysis.Financial:

Income to the project along with

assumptions:


Swabi 6.88 7.57 14.45

Mardan 6.88 7.57 14.45Buner 6.48 7.12 13.60

Lakki Marwat 6.88 7.57 14.45

DIKhan 7.29 8.02 15.30

Tank 6.88 7.57 14.45

Bannu 7.29 8.02 15.30

Karak 7.29 8.02 15.30

Haripur 7.29 8.02 15.30

Total : 63.15 69.46 132.61

District Expected Income from the Produce (@ Rs. 160000/- p.tonne)

(10% increase over the last year)

Economic:Benefit to the economy along with

assumption.

Through the help of this project socio economic condition of hard

living farming community will be changed. With better yield from

improved canola crop, he will fetch better income with lesser

investment. From the above mentioned targeted area, the farmer will

fetch 943.48 tons canola. If 40% of this produce is used for further

plantation i.e. 377.39 metric tonnes, it will cover 188696 acres under

the crop and with 10% annual increase in area it would touch 207564

acres. Following table is an assumption of the area to be broughtfrom40% of the above produce.


19/37

19


Swabi 8602 11200 19802

Mardan 8602 1120019802

Buner 8096 13440 21536

Lakki Marwat 8602 13440 22042

DIKhan 9108 13440 22548

Tank 8602 13440 22042

Bannu 9108 11200 20308

Karak 9108 11200 20308

Haripur 9108 11200 20308

Total = 78936 109760 188696

District Area to be brought from the 40% of the Expected

Produce (in acres)

Social:Benefits with indicators: Through better income farming communitywill have a pleasant social change as in

enhanced purchasing power, stepping

forward to prosperity the socio economic

level would be enhanced.

Result Based Monitoring (RBM)

Indicators:

Indicate Result Based Monitoring(RBM) framework indicators in

quantifiable terms in the

following table.

Baseline Indicator Targets after

Completion of Project

Layingout of Oilseed plots Production in

M.Tonnes

The target/

achievement during

the 1st year of the

project is Base line

(in Acres)

Area to be brought

from the 40% of the

Expected Produce (in

hectares)

The produce from the

area to be brought

from 40% of the

expected produce (in

matric tonnes) @ 506

Kgs/acre

1 Swabi = 185 Acres 24753 85 11200 5667

2 Mardan= 185 Acres 24753 85 11200 5667

3 Buner= 200 Acres 26920 80 13440 6801

4 Lakki Marwat =205 Acres 27553 85 13440 6801

5 DIKhan =210 Acres 28185 90 13440 6801

6 Tank= 205 Acres 27553 85 13440 6801

7 Bannu= 190 Acres 25385 90 11200 5667

8 Karak = 190 Acres 25385 90 11200 5667

9 Haripur = 190 Acres 25385 90 11200 5667

Total : 1760 Acres Or 712.2 ha. 235870 780 109760 55539

S.No Input Output Outcome Targeted Impact


20/37

Page 20 of 37

SWOT Analysis and Implicative Strategies

StrengthsDiverse agro-ecological situations

The diverse agro-ecological situations prevalent in the nine project districts favourscultivation canola oilseed crops. Oilseeds are being cultivated in all the agro-ecoregions of the

province. Sub-humid and arid ecosystems also contribute substantial area and production of

oilseeds.

Strong research for development of oilseed technology exist as work of the Oil Seed Development

Board in a number of oil seed crops leads to development of the sector.

Strong frontline extension network for oilseed technology dissemination

The extension network for transfer of oilseed technologies that are developed by oilseeds

development board and Agriculture Research Systems would be disseminated through ExtensionWorkers.

Technology Mission on Oilseeds and impact

Public /Private sector can play a predominant role in increasing the production of oilseeds.

The project impact/results would catch the eye of the private sector for investment.

Continuity of the work of Oil Seed Development Board in Oil Seed Promotion in the Province.

Impact of first line transfer of technology

Production and distribution of quality oilseeds

Seed is a critical and basic input for attaining sustained growth in oilseed production.

Distribution of assured quality seed is necessary for attaining higher yields. Project will also

provide technical assistance for establishment and maintenance of seed banks private level. The

Department of Agriculture Extension Khyber Pakhtunkhwa will be involved in production and

distribution of assured quality seeds for the benefit of oilseed growers.

Human resource development: Through laying out of demonstration plots and technical training /

guidelines to be extended by the Extension Staff will help in human resource development.

Initiatives from oil industry.

Result assumed from the project activities will also get attention of the Oil Industry and hoped

that initiatives would be taken by the oil industry for further extension of the scope of oil seed

production in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.


21/37

21

Weaknesses

Production situation

The country produce of oil seed only have a place of 25% of the total requirements.

The development process is a long and lethargic. Limited resources do not allowinvesting billion of rupees on development for getting higher production with

increased area under the crop.

System constraints in public sector transfer of oilseed technology

Though, the larger portion of transfer of technology responsibility lies with the public

sector, there are many lacunae that hamper the transfer of technology efforts by this sector:

1. Multiplicities of technology transfer by each line department and there is littlecoordination across different departments involved.

2. Narrow focus of the agricultural extension system i.e. limited activities have beenundertaken to develop and transfer sustainable technologies to the farmers.

3. Lack of an effective feedback system lead to the extension system that did not focus on thefelt needs of the farmers. Individual farmers or farmers forum did not have effective

linkage with the research and extension system.

4. Little attention was given by the government in developing a cadre of well-qualifiedsubject matter specialists (SMS) with both technical competence and professional skills to

disseminate the improved oilseed technologies to the field level staff as well as the oilseed

growers.

5. The poor research-extension linkage and lack of integration across crop limit technologytransfer from incorporating high value commodities and diversification of the livelihood

activities of the farm into farming systems.

6. Most of the technical staff within the line departments lack the capacity to effectivelycommunicate with both research system and the stakeholder groups. The flow of

information from research to extension tends to be top-down rather interactive. There is

little use of up-to-date communication technologies viz, mass media, print media and

electronic communication between research-extension-stakeholder systems.

Processing situation

Pakistani processing industry suffers from several maladies like outdated technology,lower rates of utilization of installed capacity, low oil recoveries and high unit costs.

Reservation of oilseeds output for small scale processing is depriving the farmers and

consumers of the benefits of lower costs of modern processing technology, while putting up

the costs for consumers. The cost of vegetable oil processing in the country is very high as

compared to the countries like China and USA mainly due to smaller capacities, low

technical efficiency and low capacity utilization. Additional inefficiency arises from non-

integration of solvent extraction units with expeller units; As a result, significant amounts of

expeller cake are not solvent extracted resulting in considerable losses of oil and meal

products.


22/37

22

Opportunities


Biotechnology offers an impressive option to supplement the ongoing efforts on

developing genetically enhanced germplasm of oilseeds for achieving sustainable foodproduction.


There are uncommon opportunities to add value to different oilseeds and oils, which

must be fully exploited, which will eventually enhance the competitiveness and sustainability of

these crops.

ThreatsProduction situation

One factor that has contributed to insufficient domestic supply of oilseeds is the

province development strategy that has often favoured production of crops that compete with

oilseeds for area. The community is attracted to grow other cash crops like sugarcane, wheat etc

and the oil seed crops get little attention of the grower.


The technical inefficiencies in oilseed production, leads to threatening processing

situation. Under utilization of resources reflects a poor-resource base of the farmers and have

implications for optimum utilization of inputs and production of outputs, both onfarm and in

processing unit to reduce allocative and scale inefficiencies. Lack of assured market for oilseeds

and timely and assured supply of quality seeds and raw material for processing have been found

as important factors contributing to the poor performance of the oilseed industry. The standards

set by the oil import countries after liberalization were very high, at times giving impression that

they were used as trade barriers. But all said and done, exporting countries especially the

developing and under developed countries were caught in the web of stringent quality parameters.

Edible oil demand is higher than the supply which created adverse economical situation.


23/37

23

Implicative strategies


The public sector has to strengthen its network for developing improved varieties/

hybrids of oilseeds and must encourage the private sector for production of hybrids and

dissemination of technologies.

Diversification in existing cropping systems such as rice-rice, rice-wheat and

sugarcane in favour of oilseeds is the current need of the country. Providing a policy back up to

support diversification in favour of oilseeds through effective input and price support system is

very important to increase area under oilseeds.

Generation of success stories by working for a minimum of 3 years with the same set of

farmers, instead of working with different groups every year. This will help in concluding

situation and farming system-specific results in a given agro-ecological situation.

Identification and analysis of success stories created by other sources of innovation. Exposure visit to the successful farms created by the other sources to study the similarities

and the differences.

Exposure visit for the interested oilseed growers to the success story sources. Replication of success stories by utilizing the successful farmers as the trainers or resource

persons and the successful farms as the classrooms.

Use of revolving fund for promoting the self-help groups in disseminating improvedtechnological packages instead of distributing subsidies. The community may be

motivated and trained in oilseed-based farming systems and other related enterprises rather

than merely technological packages.

Use of mass media viz, video programmes, print media, radio or television forpopularizing the success stories, instead of utilizing the media for popularizing thetechnological packages.

Reorienting the extension/ transfer of technology system as a system that provides market-producer linkage instead of using it as an agency for distributing input subsidy. It needs a

major shift in the outlook of the extension officials of the development departments

through constant and intensive human resource development planning and

implementation.

To strengthen oil seed marketing system following recommendation may be approved:

Better enforcement of regulated markets Strengthening the appropriate market institutions Promotion of market integration Price incentives for edible oil shortage Better management of edible oil price fluctuation risk during storage Improving quality of information and efficiency of its dissemination Rewarding better quality produce Strengthening regulations regarding quality Enhancing earning from oilcakes and oil meals

Fig 1. Conceptual summary on SWOT analysis of oilseed sector and implicative strategies


24/37

24

Strengths

Diverse agro-ecological situations.

Strong research network.

Strong first-line extension system.

Strong public sector network for seed

production.

Strong HRD facilities.

Initiatives from oil industry.

WeaknessesDependence on vagaries of monsoon.

Lack of adequate seed multiplication.

Lower seed replacement ratio.

Vulnerability to pests and diseases.

Gap in resistance breeding.

Resource poor farmers.

Weak infrastructure.

Technical inefficiency of oil industry.

Weak transfer of technology.

Lack of regulatory and trade policy support.Opportunities

Biotechnological options for genetically

enhanced germplasm.Huge exploitable yield reservoir.

Exploiting niche areas of oilseeds cultivation.

Value addition to oilseeds, oils and by-

products.

Scope for improving efficiency of oilseed

processing.

Exploiting supplementary sources of oil.

Extension of retail boom to oilseeds.

Threats

Present Agri-policy support for competing

crops.

Continuous cropping.

Aberrant weather.

Alarming demand for edible oil.

Lack of linkage to assured market.

High standards in the liberalized

Implicative strategies

Public private partnership in varietal development.

Developing self-reliant seed supply mechanism.

Efficient input and policy support for oilseeds.

Delineation and development efficient oilseed production zones.

Developing and promoting of situation specific IPM and INM packages.

Exploitation of niche areas for oilseed expansion.

Value addition to oilseeds, oils and by-products.

Gap-specific extension strategies.

Providing effective market linkage.

Favourable olic framework for oilseeds.

KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA OIL SEED SECTOR


25/37

25

Environmental:Environmental impact

assessment negative/positive.

The greenery has positive environmental

impact and its absorption power of

poisonous matters brings pleasant

environmental change. The flower attracts

honey bee and they use its nectar for honey

preparation in their hives.

Financial/Economic Analysis(with

assumptions)

Financial analysis

Quantifiable output of the project. As already mentioned above the quantifiableoutput in terms of income to be derived to the

beneficiaries will be 132.61 million during the

project life.

Profit and loss account and cashflow statement

The project is developing one and not on thebasis of profit or loss as is presumed in any

commercial launch. Any how with the help of

this investment i.e. Rs. 20.000 million, the

farmer will fetch 132.61 2 million rupees. It

will also cut the import bill of the government

as is spent on edible oil.

Net present value (NPV) andbenefit cost ratio (BCR)

Under this project, the farming community

will be given in puts for laying out of

demonstration plots. The size of plot will be

from acre to one acre. So the number of

beneficiaries will be 1079 & 1404 (per

annum) as per following schedule:

Nos. of

Plots

Size of

Plot

(in Kanals)

Total area

to be

brought (in

Acres)

Nos. of

Plots

Sizeof

Plots

(in Kanals)

Total area

to be

brought (in

Acres)

300 8 300 320 8 320

250 6 188 250 6 188

255 5 159 445 5 278

266 4 133 389 4 1951071 780 1404 980

2011-2 2012-13

Total number of beneficiaries will be 2475

with an area of 1760 acres. The cost per unit

(i.e. one acre) comes to Rs. 11363.63 or Rs.

2223.00 on 1000 population of project

districts (Estimated population of project

districts is 89,97,000).


26/37

25

Internal financial rate of return(IFRR).

The project is developmental one.

Agriculture Sector is an economic sector

and the government launches its

development project to give boost to

economic growth. Government will not

have any internal financial rate of return yetthe beneficiaries i.e. farming community

will earn better from their fields through the

help of these educational activities to be

demonstrated in their fields for adoption of

better technology in qualitative as well as

quantitative terms.

Unit cost analysis. Rs. 11363.63 per acre (Cost of inputs +other operational costs = Rs. 10520 +

843.63).

Break even point (BEP). Not applicable. Pay back period. The project will pay back to the beneficiary

on harvest. Total crop period is about 4

months.

Return on equity (ROE). The project is a profitable business and noliability rest either on service provider i.e.

government or on beneficiary. All the

expenses would be borne by the

government and services like labour,

watering, care, harvest etc is sole

responsibility of the farmers/borrowers. The

Department will extend its expertise in

shape of technical instructions and

concerned Agriculture Officer(s), Field

Assistant(s) would pay frequent visit to

make the highest yield/produce success.

Economic Analysis

Provide taxes and duties separately inthe capital and operating cost.

From a report published by Global

Agriculture Information Network (GAIN)

namely Pakistan Oilseeds and products

Annual 2011, that the government have

levied 16% Central Excise Duty and 3%

Income Tax.

The project inputs would pay usual taxes

levied by the government yet the produce

and its by products would share in to

national income through GST etc levied bythe government.


27/37

26

Net present value (NPV) and benefitCost Ratio (BCR).

Net present value of the project is Rs. 20.000

million as total investment which have inputs

expenses , operational cost i.e. T.A and POL

for the touring officers/officials. The services

viz Agriculture Experts visits and advices to

be conveyed to the farmer, services to berendered by the benefacary are not calculated

on the basis of commercial factor. The

government efforts to motivate the farming

community and to bring change in demand

and supply imbalances are worthwhile in the

long run as is discussed earlier.

Internal economic rate of return (IERR). From the area to be brought by the farmingcommunity under canola crop following

produce is estimated. This produce have a

potential to bring the change and rationalizedemand and supply. Canola is rich in oil

contents and have 40% of the oil at an

average. The project will cover 2341 acres of

land under the crop which would yield

1184.55 metric tonnes. 40% of this produce if

procured as seed it will cover an area of

about 473881 acres which on further

dissemination will yield as fetch 299691

liters of canola oil. This quantity will fulfil

the requirements of which will feed more

than 10703 persons (@ 28 kg/head per

annum).

S.No. Particulars Unit Qty

1 Area To be covered under the project Acres 2,341.00

2 Estimated Produce @ 506 kgs/acre M.Tonns 1,184.55

3 40% of produce (i.e. 473.82 tonnes) to

be used as seed will cover an area

under crop (Seed Rate @ 2 kgs/acre)

Acres 236,909.00

4 Estimated Produce of persumed area

under crop

M.Tonns 119,875.95

5 Estimated Edible oil quantity to be

obtained from 40% of the produce (Sr.

No. 4)

M.Tonns 19,180.15

6 Per Capita Consumption kg/one/annum 28.00

7 Edible Oil to be available for human

consumption

persons 685,005.45

Foreign Exchange rate of the project(Brunos Ratio) for import substitute

and export oriented projects.

Not applicable


28/37

27

Employment analysis:

Employment generation (directand indirect).

Though there is no direct employment under

the project itself as existing staff will render

the duties in addition to their own/mandatory

duties, yet through change in agriculture andbringing the new area under cultivation the

community should have engage casual

labour/farm labour at the ratio of 4 persons

per 100 acres so 2369 persons would get

jobs if engaged as farm labour for the total

presumed area i.e. 236909 acres.

Sensitivity analysis:

Impact of delays o project costand viability.

The funds must be released soon after start of

fiscal in full and not in the piece meal. Delayin releases would adversely affect the project

and will make the achievement difficult even

impossible.

12.a) Implementation Schedule: Indicate starting and completion

date of the project.

October 2011 to June 2016.

Item-wise/year wiseimplementation schedule in line

chart co-related with the phasing

of physical activities.

Swabi Mardan BunerLakki

MarwatDIKhan Tank Bannu Karak Haripur

2011-12 90 90 85 90 90 90 90 90 90

2012-13 100 100 120 120 120 120 100 100 100

90 90 85 90 90 90 90 90 90

100 100

120 120 120 120

100 100 100

Demonstration Plots to Be Laid Out (Area in Acres)

2011-12 2012-13


29/37

28

13. Maintenance structure andmanpower requirements:

Administrative arrangements forimplementation of project.

The Director General Agriculture

(Extension) will administer all project

activities through the assistance of Dy.Director P&D & his staff at Directorate

General Agriculture (Extension) Khyber

Pakhtunkhwa.

The manpower requirements byskills/profession during

execution and operation of the

project.

The required man power by skill is

available with the department i.e. District

Officer(s) Agriculture, Agriculture Officers,

Field Assistants of the concerned / project

district(s).

The job description,qualification, experience, age

and salary of each job may be

provided.

1. DISTRICT DIRECTOR AGRICULTURE:DDA acts as over all in charge of

Agriculture (Extension) Activities in his

district. He acts as executive/

operational body. Implements plans,

policy of the government regarding

agriculture. He bridges farming

community and Agricultural Scientists

and recommendations of the agricultural

scientists are disseminated through a

number of direct/indirect methods. He

uses extension tools for getting highest

economical yield of the crops. He

maintains cropping pattern in his

respective district. He acts as facilitator

to the farming community.

2. AGRICULTURE OFFICER:An agriculture graduate, team leader of

the Extension Work Force, who is

responsible for implementation of the

work plan (Kharif & Rabi Action plan

chalked out by the government of


30/37

29

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Agriculture

(Extension Department). Executes

Developmental activities of ADP/ Non

ADP Schemes launches by the Federal/

Provincial and District Governments.

3. AGRICULTURE INSPECTOR/FIELDASSISTANT:

These are important /direct links of

Extension works with the farming

community. These are Diploma holders

in Agriculture. They make the dreams

of the farming community true through

assistance / guide lines extended to the

grower from time to time. These are

front line workers and are posted at

union council level.

14.Additional projects/decisionrequired:

It is necessary to make the marketing of the

produce easy, convenient and hassle free.

The produce should further be disposed off

through oil extraction. It is recommended

that a separate project may be initiated for

establishment of oil extraction units in the

project districts so the farming community

may easily dispose its produce off in their

own districts. For the purpose governmentshould have contacted to the investors

keeping in view the produce and span of

project activities, adoption of crop

incorporating it in the cropping pattern of

farming community on a larger scale as the

production would be sufficient for

commercial usage.


31/37

30

15.Certificate The name, designation and phone # of the

officer responsible for preparing and

checking be provided. It may also be

confirmed that PC-I has been prepared as

per instructions issued by the PlanningCommission for the preparation of PC-I for

Production Sector projects.

The PC-I along with certificate must be signed by

the Principal Accounting Officer to ensure its

ownership.

It is certified that the project proposal has been prepared

on the basis of Instructions provided by the Planning

Commission for the preparation of PC-1 for production

sector project.

Prepared: (Farhat Abbas Durrani)

Development Assistant DGA(E)

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Peshawar

(03339333459)

Checked by: (Dr. Fayaz-ud-Din Qazi)

Dy. Director Planning & Monitoring

DGA (E) Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Peshawar

(03339139029)

(Muhammad Taslim)

Director General Agric.Extn.

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Peshawar.(0314 947 4490)

Approved by: (Muhammad Afsar Khan)

Secretary to the Govt. Of Khyber

Pakhtunkhwa, Agric. Livestoci & Coop.

Deptt. Peshawar.


32/37

31

MAP OF THE KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA

Project District

Project District

Project District

Project District

Project District

Project District

Project District

Project District

Project District


33/37

32

PE&DDSCHEME MONITOR AND EVALUATION SYSTEM

P.C.1 S.K.I.M.

(Scheme Key Indicator Matrix)

a. Identification of Scheme PE&DD/M&E PC-1Page 1/3

Code + Title :

District:

579-110121-Enhancement of Edible Oil

through Sowing of Canola in Khyber

Pakhtunkhwa.

Checked by:

Swabi, Mardan, Bunir, Lakki, DIKhan,

Tank, Bannu, Karak and Haripur.Sector: Agriculture Name Mohammad Taslim

Sub Sector Agriculture Extension Position Director General,Agriculture Extension,KPKCategory Agriculture Mechanization

Tick as appropriate: Approved by:

Civil

WorkMisc:

On Farm Water Management Name (Muhammad Afsar Khan)

Agriculture Extension Position Secretary to Govt. Of KPK

Agriculture Research Agriculture Deptt. KPK

Planning & Development Please encircle correct answer:

Live stock & Dairy Dev:

Veterinary Research Foreign Aided Project: No

Fruit & Veg: Dev. Board Name of donor/Foreign

Grant/foreign loan

N.A

Cooperative

Composite Scheme. NoIf yes, number of

individual components

NA

Implementation Dates for this PC-1

Project starting date Sep 2011Expected completion date 30th Jun, 2013Proposed Duration in month 22 MonthsNo. Of Financial Years involved 2 years

PC-1 Prepared by:

Name Farhat Abbas Durrani

PositionDev. Assistant

Directorate General Agri. (E)

Khyber Pukhtunkhwa, Peshawar.Date

SignatureSponsoring Agency/Line Dept. Executing Agency

1b. Revision Status 1c. General Remarks

Revised PC-1 or data? Yes / No For Ongoing Schemes:

If Yes Forum approval date.

Number of Revisions so far. Admn: approval date.

Date Original PC1 Sanctioned Technical Sanction Date

Date of 1st Start of Project Technical Sanction Cost.

Total Project duration from start.

Total Number of Financial Years TakenIf the scheme is revised then indicate the starting date of the revision, completion date as per revision, and the No. of additional months and financial years to be taken.


34/37

33

Project: Enhancement of Edible Oil through Sowing of Canola in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.Sector Agriculture Sub Sector: Agriculture ExtensionCategory Miscellaneous

3 Physcal Targetss

Sr. No. Key indicator 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th Total 1st 2nd 3rd

Laying out of

Canola D/PlotsAcres 1760 100% 780 1,760 - - - 1,760 980 1,960 2,940

i. Swabi Acres 185 11% 85 185 - - - 185 100 200 300

ii. Mardan Acres 185 100% 85 185 - - - 185 100 200 300

iii. Buner Acres 200 100% 80 200 - - - 200 120 240 360

iv. Lakki Acres 205 93% 85 205 - - - 205 120 240 360

v. DIKhan Acres 210 90% 90 210 - - - 210 120 240 360

vi. Tank Acres 205 88% 85 205 - - - 205 120 240 360

vii. Bannu Acres 190 90% 90 190 - - - 190 100 200 300

viii. Karak Acres 190 97% 90 190 - - - 190 100 200 300

ix. Haripur Acres 190 97% 90 190 - - - 190 100 200 300

1

Ex-post cumulative target for

three years after copletion

Unit of

measure-

ment

Overall

scheme

targets

Overall

Indic. Of

Scheme/

weight

Cumulative target by financial year

Signatures of approving body

Note:Fill in the blanks in table. Figures in the last quarter/year should always coincide with figures in overall scheme target column.

Weights are in percentages and should always add up to 100% They are usually pre-set but can be modified if there is a need.

The weights should always reflect the relative importance of the indicator/activity/output in the total of the scheme.

The PC-1 SKIM has to be signed and annexed to the PC1 and to the Administrative Approval forum.


35/37

34

Important Notes:

1. All costs are in Million of Pakistan Rupees. The cost breakdown should not be cumulative.Add more columns if necessary.

2. Target setting is to be done always by financial year. This means that a scheme of 10 monthsduration can still take 2 financial years to complete for instance if it is starts in April.

PE&DD/M&E PC-1

Page 3/3 empty.wk3

Local

in Rs. (M)

F.E.C.

In Rs. (M)

Local

in Rs. (M)

F.E.C.

In Rs. (M)

Local

in Rs. (M)

F.E.C.

In Rs. (M)

i.Capital - - - - - -

ii. Revenue 9.000 - 11.000 - 20.000 -

iii. Total 9.000 - 11.000 - 20.000 -

TotalSummary

Estimated Cost

Financial Year 1st Financial Year 2nd

Note:

Capital (Code) refers to the works accounts: revenue (8) to all other accounts.

(*) currency used: Pak: Rupees Exchanged Used: N.A.

Signature


36/37

35

Check List For Appraisal of PC-1

(To be attached to PC-1 Form)

1. Preliminary Checks.

S/No: Points Line Deptt. ADSC/DSC/PDWP

1 Is the Scheme in the ADP? Yes/No Yes/No

2 Is the project justified for funding

(according to policy guidelines)?

Yes/No Yes/No

3 Is it also funded by the FederalGovernment?

Yes/No Yes/No

4Is there another scheme of the same

nature in this locality/area?

Yes/No Yes/No

5

If so, has adequate justification for

implementing the scheme been givenin the PC-1 form?

Yes/No/N.A Yes/No/N.A

6 Has a feasibility study been conducted?

If yes, summarise findings in working paper.

Yes/No Yes/No/N.A

7Has the feasibility study looked at the

consequences of the project for women;

advantages/disadvantages?


8 Has the PC-1 Form has been prepared

according to the proper format?


9 Have the gander-specific guidelines

satisfactorily been used?


10 Is the PC-1 form complete in every respect? Yes/No Yes/No

11 Are plans and drawings for the projectincluded?

Yes/No Yes/No

12 Building (housing/offices) projects; do they

include facilities for women?


13 Is land available? Yes/No/NA Yes/No

14Has it been mentioned in the PC-1 Form

whether the site selected is convenientfor women/children?

Yes/No/NA Yes/No

Comments by Line Department,

if any.

Comments by ADSC/DSC/PDWP, if any

Assessment of PC-1

Comments by the ADSC/DSC/PDWP

Good, needs further

clarification, unacceptable


37/37

2. Overall and General checks:

1 Does the PC-1 Form clearly explain thespecific problems to be addressed?

Yes/No

2 Has the target-group been involved inthe identification of the problems?

Yes/No

3If women are a part of the target-group

have they been involved in the

identification of problems?

Yes/No

4Is it explained how the scheme will help

in solving these problems?

Yes/No

5 Have special measures been proposed to

solve the problems of Women?

Yes/No/N.A

6 Have objectives been formulated in preciseand correct terms?

Yes/No

7 Are objectives of the scheme related to

the overall objectives of the sector?

Yes/No

8

Are the objectives of the scheme related

to the WID-objectives of the sector, the

Five Year Plan and / or other relevant

policy papers?

Yes/No/N.A

9Has the target-group been well defined?

(Women/men/boy/girls/landless/small

farmers etc.)

Yes/No

10

Have the effects and impact (long term

changes): Benefits/disadvantages of the schemeon the development of women been

indicated? If yes, summarise findings in

working paper.

Yes/No

11

If possible negative consequences for

women have been identified, have

special measures been taken toovercome them?

Yes/No

12

Have the effects and impact (long term

changes; Benefit / disadvantages) of the

schemeon the environment been indicated?

If yes, sumarise findings in working paper.

Yes/No

Comments by Line Department, if any.

Comments by ADSC/DSC/PDWP, if any

Assessment of PC-1

Comments by the ADSC/DSC/PDWP

Good, needs further

clarification, unacceptable

pc1 edible oil final

Documents