pcps – to 2015 and beyond mike chard policy officer katie benton scrutiny officer 'you have...
TRANSCRIPT
PCPs – TO 2015 AND BEYOND
Mike ChardPolicy Officer
Katie BentonScrutiny Officer
'You have reached your destination’: scrutiny's role on the road to better places
10 June 2014
Overview…National context of Police and Crime Panels: upcoming
general election and the future of PCCs
Local context of Police and Crime Panels: sharing the burden
of work
Facilitated session on successes and challenges of policing
scrutiny post-reform, including a review of the Home Affairs SC
recommendations
Facilitated session on proactive scrutiny
Feel free to ask questions throughout!
National Context…Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011
Police and Crime CommissionersPolice and Crime Panels
Government policy to ‘hold police forces to account’ and ‘strengthen the bond between the police and the public’
Elections held 22 November 2012, PCCs in post until May 2016
Looking to 2015…Less than a year to go
Party Conferences October 2014Now seen as four-party race
Is Police and Crime a topic at the fore of the public’s mind?
Pro-PCCs: Conservatives and Liberal DemocratsAnti-PCCs: Labour and UKIPLikely that PCCs will serve out their term until May
2016, so important that PCPs ensure statutory functions remain fulfilled
Local Context…Hampshire Police and Crime Panel
20 MembersPCC: Independent Simon HayesMain Successes: complaints, confirmation hearings, enthusiastic
Panel, improving relationshipMain Challenges: access to timely and detailed information,
public engagement, complaints
Thames Valley Police and Crime Panel20 membersPCC: Anthony Stansfeld (Conservative)Main Successes: High quality engaged independent co-
optees, PCP conference, rapporteur reportsMain Challenges: access to performance information,
geography, strategic vs. local
Successes and ChallengesCfPS report – Police and
crime panels: the first year
Home Affairs Select Committee interim findings
Facilitated SessionActivity One•Ten minute discussion on the first two years that Panels have existed. Identify:
- one challenge on your table that you haven’t been able to overcome and potential resolution (what is the obstacle?)
- one area where a Panel has had real success locally (how did you do it?)
•Use flipcharts to record discussions – will write these up post-conference and share learning.•Ten minutes to share with the room key thoughts from each table, and to open up to the floor to alternative resolutions to challenges.
Proactive Scrutiny- Hampshire model: afternoon sessions following
formal meeting, scrutiny review model- Thames Valley model: two task and finish
groups per year, themed meetings- Are some issues re this:
- Are Panels overstepping the line? (HASC evidence)
- How engaged are the public and partners?
- Should Panels stick only to statutory elements?
- How else can Members fulfil their ‘support’ role?
Facilitated SessionActivity Two•Twenty minute discussion on proactive scrutiny. •Key Question: What has worked in your area – either through PCPs or in your authorities generally – that can be applied to this area of Police and Crime Panel scrutiny and support?
• How can PCPs increase visibility? • Should PCPs engage with public and partners?
•Use flipcharts to record discussions – will write these up post-conference and share learning.