pdri_101

Upload: vesgacarlos

Post on 06-Apr-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/3/2019 PDRI_101

    1/17

    BUILDINGSTRONGSM

    1

    PDRI 101Project Definition Rating Index

    MILCON Building Projects

  • 8/3/2019 PDRI_101

    2/17

    BUILDINGSTRONGSM

    2

    Agenda

    PDRI Overview

    Section Contents

    PDRI Categories

    Score

    Definition LevelsTime

    The Tool

    PDRI Savings

    Benefits to DOD

    ImplementationTier Designations

    Online Training

    PDRI publications

  • 8/3/2019 PDRI_101

    3/17

    BUILDINGSTRONGSM

    3

    PDRI Overview

    What is the Product Definition Rating Index?Developed by private sector in late 1990s

    Response to end-product construction deficiencies

    Evaluation tool applied at successive project gates Early high-risk ratings may trigger later actions

    A simple and easy-to-use tool for measuring the degree of scope definition forcompleteness

    Identifies and precisely describes each critical element in a scope definitionpackage

    Allows team to quickly predict factors impacting project risk

  • 8/3/2019 PDRI_101

    4/17

    BUILDINGSTRONGSM

    4

    PDRI Overview (Cont)

    Many companies have found broad value in PDRI

    Allows team to quickly predict factors impacting project risk

    Amgen, 3M, Hensel Phelps, GM, Beck Group, (many others)

    GSA, DHS, NASA, Smithsonian Institution

    List includes Designers, Builders, and Owner/Sponsors

    Use to assist decisions to allocate resources at project level to buy down

    risk

    Use to identify risk and enhance project definitionBLUF Benefit to DoD thru RISK MANAGEMENT at project level

  • 8/3/2019 PDRI_101

    5/17

    BUILDINGSTRONGSM

    5

    Section ContentsPDRI Building Projects

    Section I: Basis of Project Decision

    3 categories

    18 elements

    Right project

    Section II: Basis of Design

    4 categories

    32 elements

    Right product

    Section III: Execution Approach

    4 categories

    14 elements

    Right way

  • 8/3/2019 PDRI_101

    6/17

    BUILDINGSTRONGSM

    6

    PDRI for Buildings

    I. Basis of Project Decision

    II. Basis of Design

    III. Execution Approach

    A. Business Strategy

    B. Owner Philosophy

    C. Project Requirements

    D. Site InformationE. Building Programming

    F. Building/Project Design Parameters

    G. Equipment

    H. Procurement StrategyJ. Deliverables

    K. Project Control

    L. Project Execution Plan

  • 8/3/2019 PDRI_101

    7/17BUILDINGSTRONGSM

    7

    Top 10 Pacing Elements

    1. Building Use (4.4%)

    2. Facility Requirements (3.1%)

    3. Site Selection Considerations (2.8%)

    4. Business Justification (2.7%)

    5. Project Cost Estimate (2.7%)6. Business Plan (2.6%)

    7. Project Design Criteria (2.4%)

    8. Evaluation of Existing Facilities (2.4%)

    9. Future Expansion/Alteration Considerations (2.2%)

    10.Architectural Design (2.2%)

    Top 10 = 27.5% of total PDRI score

  • 8/3/2019 PDRI_101

    8/17BUILDINGSTRONGSM

    LOWER SCORE IS BETTER!!

    Understanding PDRI Scores

    0 Points

    1000 Points

  • 8/3/2019 PDRI_101

    9/17BUILDINGSTRONGSM

    9

    Definition Levels in PDRI

  • 8/3/2019 PDRI_101

    10/17BUILDINGSTRONGSM

    10

    Time Needed for Assessing a Project

    90 to 120 minutes

  • 8/3/2019 PDRI_101

    11/17BUILDINGSTRONGSM

    11

    PDRI The Tool

    Tool has been customized for MILCON process

    Customized descriptions of project elements to our needs

    Each element is weighted, algorithm generates a composite score for theproject

    Normalized from 0 to 1000

    Recommend a broad team composition

    500 is good at planning stage (subjective!!)

    300 is good at design stage (subjective!!) 200 is good by RTA (Ready To Award)

  • 8/3/2019 PDRI_101

    12/17BUILDINGSTRONGSM

    Performance < 200 > 200

    Cost 3% over budget 9% over budget

    Schedule 5% behind schedule 21% behind schedule

    Change Orders 8% of budget 11% of budget

    (N=25) (N=83)

    PDRI Score

    Comparison of Projects with PDRIAbove & Below 200 Building Projects

    Reduce cost growth by 6%

    Reduce schedule slip by 16%

    Reduce change orders by 3% of budget

  • 8/3/2019 PDRI_101

    13/17BUILDINGSTRONGSM

    13

    Benefits to DoD

    Early identification / management of project risk elements

    Standard approach to Lifecycle Costing

    Institutionalize procedures for

    Risk Management

    Risk Communication

    Target project-level resources to high-risk elements Identify, track Action Office responsible for risk by element

    Use of PDRI Action List

    Risk Management improves customer end product

    Reduce scope creep

    Fewer mods reduce cost, time growth

    Early customer input and buy-in

    PDRI enables targeted, holistic, and quantitative approach to Risk Management

  • 8/3/2019 PDRI_101

    14/17BUILDINGSTRONGSM

    14

    Implementation

    Implementation at Code 0 (Planning Charrette)

    Code 6/7/T (DBB-Design Charrette, DB-RFP Development, AB)

    PM Review (over the shoulder)

    Code 3 (Parametric Design)

    ENG 3086 Tier 3 designation may trigger a 3rd PDRI assessment

    Retarget project resources on risk buydown Previous PDRI rating used as additional data input prior to Tier designation

    Implementation Procedures

    PDRI rating at 75% in Charrette Generation of PDRI Action List

    Attach PDRI assessment to 1391 Tab C

    Follow-up on PDRI Action List from PM & Design team

    Guidance Year Design Year Budget Year Program Year

    PDRI

    assessment at

    Code 0

    GY -1

    Action List Action List Action List

    PDRI

    assessment at

    Code 6/7/T

    PDRI assessment for

    Tier 3 projects

    MILCON timeline

  • 8/3/2019 PDRI_101

    15/17BUILDINGSTRONGSM

    15

    Tier Designations

    Tier 1 Pres-bud and prior year un-awarded projects that have no perceived problems and will be

    "forecasted" and "scheduled" for an award within the goals established by for the FY

    Tier 2 Project with known or perceived problems but are still expected to be awarded/executed this fiscal

    year will be "forecasted" and "scheduled" for award within FY

    Tier3 Projects with problems and cannot be awarded within fiscal year include:

    Projects with any incomplete NEPA documentation. These will not be "forecasted" for award inthe FY but should be scheduled for award as appropriate based on the assumption the NEPAdoc will be completed prior to he scheduled Ready to advertize date. The P2 "issues comment"

    will be used to provide the NEPA completion dates

    Projects on hold (code 4 - on hold; code 5- deferred and code 8- cancelled) status percustomer request.

    Projects that have scope, pa issues and/or other delaying factors that are recognized by thecustomer as being irresolvable within sufficient time to award within the FY.

  • 8/3/2019 PDRI_101

    16/17BUILDINGSTRONGSM

    16

    Online Training

  • 8/3/2019 PDRI_101

    17/17BUILDINGSTRONG

    17

    PDRI Publications

    PDRI Building Projects

    CII Implementation Resource 155-2, 3rd Ed.

    http://construction-institute.org/pdri/